Search

In this study, cyclic variations in dual fuel combustion with diesel ignition of three different low reactivity fuels (methane, propane, and gasoline) are examined under identical operating conditions. Experiments were performed on a single cylinder research engine (SCRE) at a low load of 3.3 bar brake mean effective pressure (BMEP). The start of injection (SOI) of diesel was varied from 280 to 330 absolute crank angle degrees (CAD). Engine speed, rail pressure, and boost pressure were held constant at 1500 rpm, 500 bar, and 1.5 bar, respectively. The energy substituted by the low reactivity fuel was fixed at 80% of the total energy input. It was found that diesel-methane (DM) and diesel-propane (DP) combustion were affected by diesel mixing to a greater extent than diesel-gasoline (DG) combustion due to the higher reactivity of gasoline. The magnitude of low temperature heat release was greatest for DG combustion followed by DM and DP combustion for all SOIs. The ignition delay for DG combustion was the shortest, followed by DM and DP combustion. DM and DP combustion exhibited more cyclic variations than DG combustion. Cyclic variations decreased for DM and DP combustion when SOI was advanced; however, DG combustion cyclic variations remained essentially constant for all SOIs. Earlier SOIs (280, 290, 300, and 310 CAD) for DM and (280, 290, and 300 CAD) for DP combustion indicated some prior-cycle effects on the combustion and IMEP (i.e. some level of determinism). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This work experimentally examines the effect of methane (a natural gas surrogate) substitution on early injection dual fuel combustion at representative low loads of 3.3 and 5.0 bar BMEPs in a single-cylinder compression ignition engine. Gaseous methane fumigated into the intake manifold at various methane energy fractions was ignited using a high-pressure diesel pilot injection at 310 °CA. For the 3.3 bar BMEP, methane energy fraction sweeps from 50% to 90% were performed; while at 5.0 bar BMEP, methane energy fraction sweeps from 70% to 90% were performed. It is observed that minimum methane energy fraction is limited by maximum pressure rise rate leading to knock and maximum methane energy fraction is limited by a high coefficient of variation in netIMEP, which leads to high cyclic variations. For 3.3 bar BMEP, maximum pressure rise rate is 8 bar/°CA at 50% methane energy fraction while at 5 bar BMEP, it is 12 bar/°CA at 70% methane energy fraction. For 3.3 bar BMEP, engine-out NOx emissions decrease by 43 times when methane energy fraction increases from 50% to 90%, and it decreases by nearly 46 times when methane energy fraction increases from 70% to 90% at 5 bar BMEP. Engine-out unburned hydrocarbon emissions increase by nearly 9 times when methane energy fraction increases from 50% to 90% at 3.3 bar BMEP, and it increases by nearly 5 times when methane energy fraction increases from 70% to 90% at 5.0 bar BMEP. Engine-out carbon monoxide emissions increase by nearly 7 times when methane energy fraction increases from 50% to 90% at 3.3 bar BMEP and by nearly 5 times when methane energy fraction increases from 70% to 90% at 5.0 bar BMEP. In addition, cyclic combustion variations at both loads were analyzed to obtain further insights into the combustion process and identify opportunities to further improve fuel conversion efficiencies at low load operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Computational fluid dynamics simulations are performed to investigate the combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel/natural gas dual-fuel engine. The computational fluid dynamics model is validated against experimental measurements of cylinder pressure, heat release rate, and exhaust emissions from a single-cylinder research engine. The model predictions of in-cylinder diesel spray distribution and location of diesel ignition sites are related to the behavior observed in measured and predicted heat release rate and emissions. Various distributions of diesel fuel inside the combustion chamber are obtained by modifying the diesel injection timing and the spray included angle. Model predictions suggest that the distribution of diesel fuel in the combustion chamber has a significant impact on the characteristics of heat release rate, explaining experimental observations. Regimes of combustion in the dual-fuel engine are identified. Turbulent flame speed calculations, premixed turbulent combustion regime diagram analysis, and high-temperature front propagation speed estimation indicated that the dual-fuel combustion in this engine was supported by successive local auto-ignition and not by turbulent flame propagation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]