Search

Ischaemic spinal cord injury remains a significant challenge in thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. Modern techniques have reduced spinal cord injury rates yet managing patients during and after thoracoabdominal aortic repairs remains complex. This article outlines our comprehensive approach to the prevention of spinal cord injuries in open thoracoabdominal aortic repair operations, focusing on the placement of cerebrospinal fluid drain and intraoperative strategies to enhance spinal cord protection. Preoperative planning involves thorough patient assessment, prehabilitation and nutritional support, detailed imaging review, thorough operative planning and patient blood management. Intraoperative measures include the use of neuromonitoring techniques like near-infrared spectroscopy and motor evoked potentials, as well as cerebrospinal fluid drainage together with blood pressure management to optimize spinal cord perfusion. Postoperative management focuses on maintaining haemodynamic stability with high mean arterial pressure, along with close monitoring and management of the cerebrospinal fluid drain to improve spinal cord perfusion. Additionally, thromboelastography-guided strategies are crucial for optimizing coagulation and addressing postoperative bleeding complications. The goal of this multifaceted approach is to minimize the risk of spinal cord injury, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing the incidence of postoperative paraplegia. Our video tutorial shows some of our preoperative and intraoperative techniques for spinal cord protection in thoracoabdominal aortic repairs., (© The Author 2024. Published by MMCTS on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: To investigate impact of frozen elephant trunk (FET) on long-term distal aortic remodeling in acute A aortic dissection (AAD) according to the latest recommended standards from the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS)/Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)., Methods: Clinical data and imaging of patients who underwent FET to treat acute AAD over the last 8 years were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if a pre and postoperative computed angio tomographies at least 30 days from surgery was available for comparison. Contrasted postprocessed imaging were analyzed with Aquarius iNtuition (TeraRecon Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) to analyze long-term positive aortic remodeling, false lumen thrombosis, and aortic expansion according to the SVS or STS recommendations. Secondary endpoints were the rate of in-hospital and long-term mortality, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and aortic-related reinterventions., Results: Out of 75 patients who underwent FET for type A AAD, n = 41 (54.6%) were included. Significant positive aortic remodeling was reported in Ishimaru zone 1-4 but not in visceral or infrarenal aorta (P < 0.001), and the overall rate of false lumen thrombosis was 95.1% (n = 39). Aortic expansion rates were as follows: 4.9% in zones 1-4, 8.3% in zones 5-6, and 15% in zone 7. The rates of in-hospital mortality and long-term mortality were 7.3% (n = 3) and 9.7% (n = 4), respectively. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range 1-141, reintervention rate was 17.1%., Conclusions: We report positive aortic remodeling of the distal thoracic aorta in patients who underwent FET for acute AAD according to the SVS or STS reporting standards. The positive effect on the distal aorta is limited to the thoracic segments but not in the visceral aorta., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Spinal cord ischaemia leading to paraplegia or paraparesis is one of the most devastating complications of aortic surgery. The risk of ischaemia is particularly high in repairs involving both the thoracic and abdominal segments, because in these cases blood flow to the spinal arteries can be interrupted. Multimodal protocols have now been developed to reduce the incidence of this complication, and include measures such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, avoidance of hypotension and anaemia, systemic hypothermia, neuromonitoring, maintaining distal perfusion during proximal clamping of the aorta, and reimplantation of intercostal or lumbar arteries, whenever feasible. We describe a case in which, due to the special characteristics of the surgery, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) was used to maintain distal blood flow in the lumbar, inferior mesenteric, and hypogastric arteries during aortic clamping. This approach reduced the risk of spinal cord and visceral ischaemia, and also eliminated the need for thoracotomy because partial left bypass was not required., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Paraplegia remains one of the major complications of contemporary open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) act as a surrogate measure for spinal cord homeostasis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of intraoperative neuromonitoring in contemporary TAAA repair and its association with postoperative spinal cord ischemia (SCI)., Methods: Patients who underwent open type 2 or 3 TAAA or completion aortic repair using intraoperative neuromonitoring were identified between May 2006 and November 2023. Patient demographics, comorbidities, indication for the procedure, procedural details, and outcomes were recorded. The groups were divided based on type of repair, and univariate statistics were then used to evaluate the association of these metrics vs the type of repair., Results: Seventy-nine patients underwent open type 2 (N = 41) and 3 (N = 23) TAAA and completion aortic (N = 15; open in 14 and endovascular in 1) repairs by a single surgeon. The cohort was predominantly male (N = 48, 60.8%) with a mean age of 52.5 ± 16.2 years. There was a high incidence of hypertension (N = 53, 67.1%), smoking history (N = 42, 53.1%), and connective tissue disorders (N = 37, 46.8%). Operative indications included dissection-related (N = 50, 63.3%) and degenerative (N = 26, 32.9%) TAAA and dissection-related malperfusion (N = 3, 3.8%). Left heart bypass was often (N = 73, 92.4%) used for distal aortic perfusion, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage (N = 77, 97.5%) was a common adjunct. MEPs were classified as no change (N = 43, 54.4%), reversible change (N = 26, 32.9%), irreversible change (N = 4, 5.1%), and unreliable (N = 6, 7.6%). MEP changes were predominantly bilateral (N = 70, 88.6%) and occurred most often during repair of the abdominal aortic segment (N = 13, 16.5%). The median number of replaced vertebral levels was associated with MEP changes (P = .013). SCI was only observed in repairs greater than 6 replaced vertebral levels with an overall frequency of 17.7%. It was most prevalent in completion aortic repairs (26.7%). Immediate and delayed SCI occurred in 10.1% and 7.6% of patients, respectively; it was most commonly (71.8%) reversible. Permanent paraplegia occurred in four patients (5.1%), with equal immediate and delayed onsets. MEPs demonstrated poor sensitivity (53.9%) and specificity (62.3%) for SCI; however, there was a high negative predictive value (86.4%) in this population. In-hospital mortality occurred in five (6.3%) patients., Conclusions: No changes in intraoperative MEPs are highly predictive of spinal cord homeostasis. The number of replaced vertebral levels and previous aortic repair should guide intraoperative neuroprotective measures including intercostal reimplantation and should take precedence over intraoperative monitoring, especially when MEP changes occur., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal cord ischemia is one of the complications that can occur after open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repair. This occurs despite various perioperative approaches, including distal aortic perfusion, hybrid procedures with extra anatomical bypasses, motor-evoked potential, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage. The inability to recognize spinal ischemia in a timely manner remains a devastating complication after thoracoabdominal aortic repair.This review aims to look at novel technologies that are designed for continuous monitoring to detect early changes that signal the development of spinal cord ischemia and to discuss their benefits and limitations., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the technologies available for continuous monitoring in the intensive care unit for early detection of spinal cord ischemia. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used different technologies for monitoring spinal ischemia during the postoperative period. All articles that were not available in English were excluded. To ensure that all relevant articles were included, no other significant restrictions were imposed., Results: We identified 59 studies from the outset to December 2022 to be included in our study. New techniques have been studied as potentially useful monitoring tools that could provide simple and effective monitoring of the spinal cord. These include near-infrared spectroscopy, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, fiber optic monitoring of the spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers., Conclusions: Despite the development of new techniques to monitor for postoperative spinal cord ischemia, their use remains limited. We recommend more future research to ensure rapid intervention for our patients., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The technical aspects of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), specifically the location of proximal seal zone (PSZ) (need to cover the left subclavian artery [LSA]), distal seal zone (DSZ) (length of aortic coverage), benefit of LSA revascularization, and prophylactic lumbar drainage are still debated. Each of these issues has potential benefits but also has known risks. This study aims to identify factors associated with reintervention and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) following TEVAR for acute TBAD with a zone 3 entry tear., Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for TEVARs performed for acute TBAD with zone 3 entry tear, zone 3 proximal zone of disease, treated with TEVAR extending between zone 2 and zone 5. The primary outcomes were SCI and related reintervention. Secondary outcomes were stroke, arm ischemia, and retrograde type A dissection (RTAD). The exposure variables were PSZ 2 vs 3, DSZ 4 vs 5, prophylactic lumbar drain, and LSA revascularization. Univariate analyses were conducted with χ 2 analysis, and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate association with outcomes., Results: Of 583 patients who met inclusion criteria, 266 had PSZ 2 and 317 had PSZ 3. On univariate analysis, PSZ 2 was associated with a higher rate of reintervention, but PSZ2 was not significant on multivariable analysis after accounting for age, sex, race, smoking, PSZ, DSZ, prophylactic lumbar drain, and LSA patency. PSZ 2 was not associated with SCI, arm ischemia, or RTAD. PSZ 2 was associated with a trend towards a higher rate of stroke. DSZ 4 and DSZ 5 were performed in 161 and 422 TEVARs, respectively, and DSZ 5 was associated with a higher rate of SCI on univariate (3 [1.9%] vs 39 [9.2%]; P = .01) and multivariable (odds ratio, 7.384; 95% confidence interval, 2.193-24.867; P = .001) analyses. Prophylactic lumbar drain placement was not statistically significantly associated with SCI, but lack of postoperative LSA patency was associated with SCI (odds ratio, 2.966; 95% confidence interval, 1.016-8.656; P = .05)., Conclusions: This study found that PSZ 2 was not associated with lower reinterventions or higher rates of SCI but trended towards a higher rate of stroke than PSZ 3. Additionally, DSZ 5 was strongly associated with SCI when compared with DSZ 4, highlighting the importance of limiting aortic coverage to coverage of the proximal entry tear when possible., Competing Interests: Disclosures G.A.M. is a consultant for W.L. Gore and Cook. S.M.H. is a consultant for WL Gore, Cook, and Terumo. L.D. is supported by grants UL1TR001855 and UL1TR000130 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) of the United States National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is one of the few preventative and therapeutic practices that may reduce spinal cord ischemia in high-risk thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR). Although this is part of clinical guidelines in open thoracoabdominal aortic repair, there are no randomized controlled trials that provide convincing evidence on the protection conferred by CSF drainage in high-risk TEVAR patients. This gap in knowledge obfuscates clinical decision making given the risk of significant complications of CSF drain insertion and management. The current literature is inconclusive and provides conflicting results regarding the efficacy of, and complications from, CSF drainage in TEVAR. Filling the knowledge gap resulting from the limited current state of the literature warrants additional high-quality randomized controlled clinical trials that balance CSF drainage efficacy with potential complications in high-risk TEVAR patients., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved.)

Background: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a potentially devastating complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of neuromonitoring modalities to mitigate the risk of SCI during TEVAR and F-BEVAR procedures., Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a detailed literature search of databases including PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL, from 1998 to the present. Inclusion criteria were original research articles examining neuromonitoring during TEVAR and F-BEVAR. The primary outcome was the incidence of SCI, while the secondary outcome included early mortality. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale., Results: From 1,450 identified articles, 11 met inclusion criteria, encompassing data from 1,069 patients. Neuromonitoring modalities included motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), and near-infrared spectroscopy. The combination of MEPs and SSEPs was most commonly used, with 93% sensitivity and 96% specificity for detecting SCI risks. SCI incidence ranged from 3.8 to 17.3%, with permanent deficits occurring in 2.7-5.8% of cases. In-hospital mortality ranged from 0.4 to 8%. Risk factors for SCI were identified, including operation duration and extent of aortic coverage., Conclusions: Neuromonitoring with MEPs and SSEPs appears to be effective in detecting perioperative SCI risk during TEVAR and F-BEVAR. However, discrepancies between neuromonitoring changes and actual SCI outcomes suggest the need for cautious interpretation. While the incidence of SCI remains variable, identified risk factors may guide clinical decisions, particularly in high-risk procedures. Future research should focus on prospective studies and randomized controlled trials to validate these findings and improve SCI prevention strategies in TEVAR and F-BEVAR., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study investigated the usefulness of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for intra-operative monitoring to detect the risk of spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Risk factors for SCI in TEVAR were also analysed., Methods: Among 330 TEVARs performed from February 2009 to October 2018, 300 patients underwent intra-operative MEP monitoring. SCI risk groups were extracted based on MEP amplitude changes using a cutoff value of 50%. When the amplitude decreased to < 50% of the pre-operative value, intra-operative mean arterial pressure (MAP) was increased by about 20 mmHg using noradrenaline, whereas MAP was usually controlled to about 80 mmHg during surgery. Other efforts were also made to increase MEP amplitude by increasing cardiac output, correcting anaemia, and finishing the surgery promptly. Based on MEP amplitude data, SCI risk groups were extracted and risk factors for SCI in TEVAR were analysed., Results: A total of 283 non-SCI risk patients and 17 SCI risk patients by MEP monitoring were extracted; only 1.0% developed immediate paraplegia and none developed delayed paraplegia. Bivariable analysis showed significant differences in chronic kidney disease, haemodialysis, artery of Adamkiewicz closure, and stent graft (SG) covered length ≥ 8 vertebral bodies. Logistic regression analysis showed hyperlipidaemia (odds ratio [OR] 3.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08 - 11.67; p = .037), SG covered length ≥ 8 vertebral bodies (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.78; p = .034), and haemodialysis (OR 27.78, 95% CI 6.02 - 128.22; p < .001) were the most influential risk factors for SCI in TEVAR., Conclusion: MEPs might be a useful monitoring tool to predict SCI in TEVAR. In addition, hyperlipidaemia, SG covered length ≥ 8 vertebral bodies, and haemodialysis represent key risk factors for SCI during TEVAR., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether the combination of H 2 gas inhalation and administration of hydrogen-rich acetated Ringer's solution (HS) could protect against ischemic spinal cord injury in rabbits., Methods: In Experiment 1, rabbits were randomly assigned to a 1.2% H 2 gas group, HS group, 1.2% H 2 gas + HS group (combination group), or control group (n = 6 per group). The H 2 concentration of HS was 0.65 mM. H 2 was inhaled for 60 min, starting 5 min before reperfusion. HS (20 mL/kg) was divided into six bolus injections at 10-min intervals, starting 5 min before reperfusion. Spinal cord ischemia was produced by occluding the abdominal aorta for 15 min. Neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed 7 days after reperfusion. In Experiment 2, H 2 concentrations in spinal cord tissue according to the administration of 1.2% H 2 gas or HS were compared by measuring the electric current through a platinum needle electrode (n = 2). In Experiment 3, rabbits were assigned to a 2% H 2 gas group or control group (n = 6 per group). Spinal cord ischemia was produced and neurologic and histopathologic evaluations were performed as in Experiment 1., Results: There were no significant differences among the groups in the neurologic and histopathologic outcomes in Experiments 1 and 3. Bolus administration of HS (10 mL) transiently increased the current to only 1/30th and 1/27th of the plateau current with 1.2% H 2 gas inhalation in two animals., Conclusion: These results suggest that the combination of 1.2% H 2 gas inhalation and administration of a hydrogen-rich solution does not protect against ischemic spinal cord injury and that the increase in H 2 concentration in spinal cord tissue after administration of HS is very low compared to 1.2% H 2 gas inhalation., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists.)

Background: Endovascular techniques have transformed the management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). However, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) remains a prevalent and devastating complication. Prophylactic drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is among the proposed strategies for prevention of SCI. Although prophylactic CSF drainage is widely used and conceptually attractive, prophylactic CSF drains have not been demonstrated to definitively prevent the occurrence nor mitigate the severity of SCI in endovascular TAAA repair. Whether or not outcomes of prophylactic drains are superior to therapeutic drains remains unknown. This pilot study was performed to determine the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial designed to investigate the role of prophylactic vs therapeutic CSF drains in the prevention of SCI in patients undergoing endovascular TAAA repair using branched and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FBEVAR)., Methods: This was a prospective multicenter randomized pilot clinical trial conducted at The University of Alabama at Birmingham and The University of Massachusetts. Twenty patients were enrolled and randomized to either the prophylactic drainage or therapeutic drainage groups, prior to undergoing FBEVAR for extensive TAAAs and arch aortic aneurysms. This was a pilot feasibility study that was not powered to detect statistical differences in clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was feasibility of randomization and compliance with a shared lumbar drain protocol. Secondary outcomes included rate of drain complications and SCI., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled and successfully randomized, without any crossovers, to either the control cohort (n = 10), without prophylactic drains, or the experimental cohort (n = 10), with prophylactic drains. There were no differences in age, comorbidities, or history of prior aortic surgery across the cohorts. All patients were treated with FBEVAR. Aneurysm classifications were as follows: Extent I (10%), Extent II (50%), Extent III (35%), and Extent IV (5%). The average length of aortic coverage was 207 ± 21.6 mm. The length of aortic coverage did not vary across cohorts, nor did procedural times or blood loss volume. Compliance with the SCI prevention protocol was 100% across both groups. Within the prophylactic drain cohort, one patient experienced an adverse event related to lumbar drain placement, manifested as an epidural hematoma requiring laminectomy, without neurologic deficit (n = 1/10; 10%). There was one SCI event (n = 1/20; 5%), which occurred in the prophylactic drain cohort on postoperative day 9 following an episode of hypotension related to a gastrointestinal bleed., Conclusions: The role of prophylactic CSF drains for the prevention of SCI following endovascular TAAA repair is a topic of ongoing research, with many current practices based on expert opinion and experience, rather than rigorous scientific data. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a multicenter randomized clinical trial to evaluate the role of prophylactic vs therapeutic CSF drains in the prevention of SCI in patients undergoing endovascular TAAA repair., Competing Interests: Disclosures A.B. reports research support from Cook Medical, Endospan, Medtronic, Philips, Terumo, W.L. Gore & Associates; and consulting for Artivion, Cook Medical, Philips, Terumo (all funds to University of Alabama Birmingham). M.S. reports consulting with Artivion, Medtronic, and Gore. A.S. reports consulting for Cook, Artivion, Phillips (all compensation to UMass Foundation). G.O. reports consulting for Gore, Cook, GE Healthcare, and Centerline Biomedical; and research for GE Healthcare. C.T. reports consulting and research support from Cook Medical Inc, Philips, and W.L. Gore. J.O.J. reports grants from National Institutes for Health, Department of Defense, Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium, and National Institute for Health and Care Research; study support from Infrascan and CSL Behring; consultant for CSL Behring, Infrascan, Cellphire, and Octapharma., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) can cause permanent neurologic deficits and poor long-term survival. Targeted treatment of new SCI symptoms after TEVAR (rescue therapy [RT]) might improve/resolve neurologic symptoms but few data characterize the association of specific interventions with SCI outcomes. We evaluated the effectiveness of post-TEVAR RT at our tertiary aortic center., Methods: Our institutional TEVAR database was reviewed for SCI incidence and details of RT. This included cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD), medical therapy, and optimization of spinal cord oxygen delivery. SCI outcomes were categorized at discharge as paralysis/paraparesis and temporary/permanent., Results: Nine hundred forty-three TEVAR procedures were performed in 869 patients from 2011 to 2020. Post-TEVAR SCI occurred in 7.8% (n = 74) with permanent paraplegia in 1.5%. Older patient age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and previous abdominal aortic surgery were predictive of SCI. Half (n = 37) of SCI episodes resulted in only temporary paralysis/paraparesis. Rescue postoperative cerebrospinal fluid drains were implanted in 3.7% (n = 35) of procedures and was predicted by higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, lower serum hemoglobin level, elevated international normalized ratio, bilateral iliac artery occlusion, nonelective procedures, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer/intramural hematoma indication. The most commonly used RTs were emergent placement of or increased drainage from an existing cerebrospinal fluid drain (87.8%), induced/permissive hypertension (77.0%), corticosteroid bolus (36.5%), and naloxone infusion (33.8%). Neurologic improvement occurred in 68.9% (n = 51/74). New/increased drainage was associated with improved SCI outcome., Conclusions: Permanent paraplegia from post-TEVAR SCI is rare (1.5%). Older patients with comorbidities carry greater post-TEVAR SCI risk. SCI symptoms improved/resolved with CSFD and multimodal RT in 68.9% of patients, but no intervention was independently associated with improvement. TEVAR centers should have robust protocols for timely and safe CSFD placement to augment RT strategies for SCI., (Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Paraplegia is one of the most feared complications after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The purpose of this study is to determine whether aortic thrombus characteristics are associated with spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR)., Methods: From April 2011 to April 2020, 62 patients underwent elective BEVAR for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and pararenal aortic aneurysms using a low-profile device and had a complete preoperative computed tomography angiography of the aorta from the sinotubular junction to the aortic bifurcation. Aortic thrombus was evaluated for thrombus thickness ≥5 mm, thrombus >2/3 of aortic circumference, and the presence of an ulcer-like thrombus. One point was assigned at each 5 mm axial image if all 3 criteria were met, resulting in a total "shaggy score" for the entire aorta. Data on demographics, procedural details, and outcomes were collected prospectively. All patients underwent a standard spinal cord protection protocol, including routine cerebrospinal fluid drainage. In July 2016, an insulin infusion protocol (IIP) was initiated to maintain postoperative blood glucose levels <120 mg/dL for 48 hours. The primary clinical end point was postoperative SCI., Results: 10 (16%) patients developed postoperative SCI: 6 with transient paraparesis, 2 with persistent paraparesis, and 2 with persistent paraplegia. Patients with SCI were older, had higher shaggy scores, and were less likely to have been on an IIP. There were no significant differences in demographics, aneurysm type, or operative parameters. In a logistic multivariate regression model for SCI, age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.2 [1.1-1.4], P = .02) and shaggy score (OR: 1.2 [1.1-1.4], P = .02) were independently associated with increased risk of SCI, whereas treatment with the IIP was associated with lower risk of SCI (OR: 0.04 [0.006-0.50], P = .05). Of the individual components of the shaggy score, higher descending thoracic aortic ulcer scores were the most strongly associated with postoperative SCI (P = .009)., Conclusions: Preoperative characterization of aortic wall thrombus is an important adjunctive tool for individualized clinical decision-making and patient counseling about the risk of SCI after BEVAR., Competing Interests: Disclosures J.H. has received royalties from licensed patents to Cook Medical (spouse). All other authors declare nothing to disclose relevant to this work., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Fetal spinal cord ischemia is a serious medical condition that can result in significant neurological damage and adverse outcomes for the fetus. However, the lack of an appropriate experimental model has hindered the understanding of the pathology and the development of effective treatments. In our study, we established a system for screening drugs that affect fetal spinal cord ischemia using spinal cord organoids. Importantly, we produced necrotic core-free human spinal cord organoids (nf-hSCOs) by reducing the organoid size to avoid potential complications of spontaneous necrosis in large organoids. Exposing nf-hSCOs to CoCl2 as a hypoxia mimetic and hypoglycemic conditions resulted in significant neuronal damage, as assessed by multiple assay batteries. By utilizing this model, we tested chemicals that have been reported to exhibit beneficial effects in brain organoid-based ischemia models. Surprisingly, these chemicals did not provide sufficient benefit, and we discovered that rapamycin is a mild neuroprotective reagent for both axon degeneration and neuronal survival. We propose that nf-hSCO is suitable for large-scale screening of fetal neural ischemia due to its scalability, ease of ischemic induction, implementation of quantifiable assay batteries, and the absence of spontaneous necrosis., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objective: The aim of the present systematic review was to determine whether prophylactic use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) contributes to a lower rate of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD)., Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify all relevant studies reported before May 7, 2023. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023441392). The primary outcome was permanent SCI. Secondary outcomes were temporary SCI and 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The data were presented as the pooled event rates (ERs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: A total of 1008 studies were screened, of which 34 studies with 2749 patients were included in the present analysis. The mean Downs and Black quality assessment score was 8.71 (range, 5-12). The pooled rate of permanent SCI with prophylactic CSFD was identical to that without prophylactic CSFD (2.0%; 95% CI, 1.0-3.0; P = 0.445). No statistically significant difference was found between the rates of permanent SCI with routine vs. selective prophylactic CSFD (P = 0.596). The pooled rate of temporary SCI was 1.0% (95% CI, 0.00-1.0%). The pooled rate for 30-day or in-hospital mortality was not significantly different (P = 0.525) in patients with prophylactic CSFD (4.0, 95% CI 2.0-6.0) or without prophylactic CSFD (5.0, 95% CI 2.0-7.0)., Conclusions: The systematic review has shown that prophylactic CSFD was not associated with a lower rate of permanent SCI and 30-day or in-hospital mortality after TEVAR for TBAD., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives. Paraplegia is devastating complication associated with thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vast evidence has been gathered on pre-, peri- and postoperative protective adjuncts aiming to minimize spinal cord ischemia. This review focuses on the pretreatment phase of open surgical or endovascular aortic procedures and gathers the experimental data on the interventional preconditioning and priming methods that increase the spinal cord ischemic tolerance. Design. By the start of March 2021, a systematic review was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science core collection to identify the articles that reported (i) either an ischemic preconditioning, remote ischemic preconditioning or priming method prior to (ii) experimental spinal cord ischemia performed in endovascular or open surgical fashion mimicking either thoracic, abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm procedures. (iii) The outcomes were reported via neurological, motor-evoked potential, somatosensory-evoked potential, histopathological, immunohistochemical, physiological analysis, or in different combinations of these measurements. Results. The search yielded 7802 articles, and 57 articles were included in the systematic review. The articles were assessed by the evaluated species, the utilized pretreatment, the measured protective effects, and the suggested underlying mechanisms. Conclusions. The reviewed articles showed several possible mechanisms in ischemic and remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of spinal cord ischemia. The main suggested method for priming was arteriogenetic stimulus. Future studies should confirm these hints of arteriogenetic stimulus with more precise quantification of the protective recruitment process.

Background: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) continues to be a devastating complication after repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The objective of this review is to present our single-center outcomes after the implementation of a standardized neuroprotective protocol following branched endovascular aortic repair., Methods: A standardized neuroprotective protocol including preoperative steroids, acetazolamide, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative treatment goals was initiated in November 2019. Physician-modified branched endovascular repairs were completed at a single center from 2012 to 2021 with outcomes reviewed both before (n = 107) and after (n = 67) the implementation of the neuroprotective protocol. The primary end point was the incidence of any SCI event at 30 days. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and renal failure at 30 days. Patients with Crawford extents I-III, renal failure, or necessitating emergent repair were deemed high risk for SCI events and underwent a subset analysis. Survivability after SCI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier tables., Results: Of the 174 consecutive patients treated, the 67 patients treated following implementation of the neuroprotective protocol were more likely to have experienced a prior myocardial infarction (26.9% vs. 14%; P = 0.0466) and have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (64.3% vs. 45.8%; P = 0.02). This group was more likely to be treated for paravisceral aneurysms (53.7% vs. 24.3%; P = 0.0002). Postprotocol implementation, spinal drain use was lower (6% vs. 38.3%; P = <0.0001) with 100% of these drains placed in urgent or unstaged thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs as a part of the protocol. Rates of any SCI event among all patients before and after implementation of the protocol were 9.3% (n = 10 of 107) and 6% (n = 4 of 67; P = 0.57), respectively. In comparison, the protocol significantly reduced SCI rates to 0 (0% vs. 17.1%; P = 0.0407) in high-risk patients. Frequency of renal failure was reduced (3% vs. 14%; P = 0.018) after initiation of the protocol. Patients in the postprotocol group had significantly improved 1-year mortality rate (9% vs. 27.1%; P = 0.0035) and renal failure rates (2% vs. 15%; P = 0.018). Regression models indicated that patients in the postprotocol group had lower likelihood of mortality and renal failure than patients in preprotocol group (P < 0.05) and that spinal drain reduced mortality (P < 0.1)., Conclusions: Implementation of a standardized neuroprotective protocol that focuses on medical management and fluid dynamics may significantly reduce risk of SCI after branched endovascular repairs, with the most significant improvement of SCI outcomes involving those at greatest risk for developing SCI. Also noteworthy, there was significant improvement to 1-year survivability after the implementation of this neuroprotective protocol., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite advancements in surgical and postoperative management, spinal cord injury has been a persistent complication of both open and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Spinal cord injury can be explained with an ischemia-infarction model which results in local edema of the spinal cord, damaging its structure and leading to reversible or irreversible loss of its function. Perfusion of the spinal cord during aortic procedures can be enhanced by several adjuncts which have been described with a broad variety of evidence in their support. These adjuncts include systemic hypothermia, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, extracorporeal circulation and distal aortic perfusion, segmental arteries reimplantation, left subclavian artery revascularization, and staged aortic repair. The Authors here reviewed and discussed the role of such adjuncts in preventing spinal cord injury from occurring, pinpointing current evidence and outlining future perspectives., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. The benefit of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (pCSFD) to prevent SCI is still under investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SCI rate and the impact of pCSFD following complex endovascular repair (fenestrated or branched endovascular repair [F/BEVAR]) for type I to IV TAAA., Methods: The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement was followed. A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including all consecutive patients, managed for TAAA type I to IV using F/BEVAR, between January 1, 2018, and November 1, 2022, for degenerative and post-dissection aneurysms. Patients with juxta- or pararenal aneurysms were excluded, as well as cases managed urgently for aortic rupture or acute dissection. After 2020, pCSFD in type I to III TAAAs was abandoned and replaced by therapeutic CSFD (tCSFD), performed only in patients presenting SCI. The primary outcome was the perioperative SCI rate for the entire cohort and the role of pCSFD for type I to III TAAAs., Results: In total, 198 patients were included (mean age, 71.1±3.4 years; 81.8% males), including 50.5% with type I to III TAAA. The primary technical success was 94.9%. The perioperative mortality was 2.5%. and the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate was 10.6%; 4.5% presented SCI of any type (2.5% paraplegia). When comparing the SCI group with the remaining cohort, patients with SCI presented higher MACE (66.7% vs 7.9%; P < .001) rate and longer intensive care unit stay (3.5 vs 1 day; P = .002). Following type I to III repair, similar SCI, paraplegia, and paraplegia with no recovery rates were reported in the pCSFD and tCSFD groups (7.3% vs 5.1%; P = .66; 4.8% vs 3.3%; P = .72; and 2% vs 0%; P = .37)., Conclusions: The incidence of SCI after TAAA I to IV endovascular repair was low. SCI was associated with significantly increased MACE and intensive care unit stay. The prophylactic use of CSFD in type I to III TAAAs was not associated with lower SCI rates and may not be justified routinely., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether prophylactic use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage in endovascular descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair contributes to a lower rate of post-operative spinal cord ischaemia (SCI)., Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL., Review Methods: A literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021245893). Risk of bias was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) of both early and late onset SCI. Pooled outcome estimates were calculated using the odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% CI. The primary outcome was SCI, both early and lateonset. Secondary outcomes were complications of CSF drainage, length of hospital stay, and peri-operative (30 day or in hospital) mortality rates., Results: Twenty-eight observational, retrospective studies were included, reporting 4 814 patients (2 599 patients with and 2 215 without CSF drainage). The NOS showed a moderate risk of bias. The incidence of SCI was similar in patients with CSF drainage (0.05, 95% CI 0.03 ‒ 0.08) and without CSF drainage (0.05, 95% CI 0.00 ‒ 0.14). No significant decrease in SCI was found when using CSF drainage (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29 ‒ 1.55, p = .35). The incidence rate of CSF drainage related complication was 0.10 (95% CI 0.04 ‒ 0.19). The 30 day and in hospital mortality rate with CSF drainage was 0.08 (95% CI 0.05 ‒ 0.12). The 30 day and in hospital mortality rate without CSF drainage and comparison with late mortality and length of hospital stay could not be determined due to lack of data. The quality of evidence was considered very low., Conclusion: Pre-operative CSF drainage placement was not related to a favourable outcome regarding SCI rate in endovascular TAAA and DTAA repair. Due to the low quality of evidence, no clear recommendation on pre-operative use of CSF drainage placement can be made., (Copyright © 2023 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In recent years, the widespread use of thoracic/thoracoabdominal stent grafting and a better understanding of spinal cord blood supply have led to quite a few change in measures to prevent spinal cord injury. It is essential to understand the characteristics of spinal cord blood flow, which is complicated by collateral pathways, and to strive to maintain spinal cord blood flow during surgery. It is also important to plan staged repair as much as possible in any treatment modality. Particular attention must be paid to the prevention of second attacks, especially after thoracic/thoracoabdominal endovascular aortic repair without segmental artery reconstruction. Systemic circulatory and respiratory management, improvement of anemia, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage with attention to drainage rates, may be effective as preventive and therapeutic measures for spinal cord injury.

Objective: Cerebrospinal fluid drains (CSFDs) are efficacious in preventing spinal cord injury after thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair with extensive coverage. Increasingly, fluoroscopy is used to guide placement instead of the traditional landmark-based approach, but it is unknown which approach is associated with fewer complications., Design: A retrospective cohort study., Setting: In the operating room., Participants: Patients having undergone thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair with a CSFD over a 7-year period at a single center., Interventions: No intervention., Measurements and Main Results: Groups were reviewed and statistically compared with respect to baseline characteristics, ease of CSFD placement, and major and minor complications directly related to placement. A total of 150 CSFDs were placed with landmark guidance as opposed to 95 with fluoroscopy guidance. Compared to the landmark group, patients with fluoroscopy-guided CSFDs were older (p < 0.008), had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores (p = 0.008), required fewer CSFD placement attempts (p = 0.011), had the CSFD in place for longer duration (p < 0.001), and had a similar incidence of CSFD-related complications (p > 0.999). Composites of both major (4.5% of cases) and minor CSFD-related complications (6.1% of cases), the primary outcomes of the study, occurred with similar incidences between the 2 groups (p > 0.999 for both comparisons) after adjusting potential confounders., Conclusions: In patients undergoing thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repairs, there were no significant differences in the risk of major and minor CSFD-related complications between fluoroscopic guidance and the landmark approach. Although the authors' institution is a high-volume center for this type of procedure, the study was limited by a small sample size. Hence, regardless of the technique used for the placement of CSFD, the risks related to the placement should be balanced carefully against the potential benefits resulting from spinal cord injury prevention. Fluoroscopy-aided insertion of CSFD requires fewer attempts and, hence, may be better tolerated by patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: A common measure to lower the risk for spinal cord ischemia (SCI) during complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR) is prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD). This method has caused controversy because of drain-related complications. Spinal drains are usually pressure directed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of CSFD-related complications and SCI within the context of an automated volume-directed drain protocol., Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study of all cEVARs with CSFD at a tertiary vascular center between January 2014 and December 2020. Demographics, complications, and spinal drain data were recorded. All drainages were volume based using an automatic drainage system (LiquoGuard7; Möller Medical GmbH). Spinal drain complications were categorized as disabling and nondisabling according to the modified Rankin scale. The primary end point was any CSFD-related complication., Results: A total of 448 cEVAR patients were identified, of whom 147 (32.8%) had prophylactic CSFD. The mean age was 69 years (63% male). The most common pathology (61%) was thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, and the most common procedure was branched EVAR (55.1%). Eighteen (12.2%) patients developed a CSFD-related complication, whereof three (2%) were disabling. Nineteen (13%) patients developed SCI: 12 (8.4%) paraparetic, 5 (3.4%) paraplegic, and 2 (1.4%) paresthesias. Of these, 13 (68%) had full reversal of symptoms, whereas 6 patients (4%) had residual symptoms and were deemed disabling. Drain-related complications were more common in patients with SCI (31.6%) compared with those without (9.4%, P = .014). In the latter group, only two patients (1.6%) developed a disabling drain-related complication., Conclusions: Selective use of prophylactic, automated volume-directed CSFD in patients at high risk for SCI was associated with a high incidence of complications and should be used with caution. Among those developing SCI, reversal was achieved frequently with increased CSFD volume, but at the price of more bleeding complications., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: While open surgical repair remains the gold standard for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) treatment, there is still no consensus regarding perioperative neuromonitoring technique for prevention of spinal cord ischaemia., Methods: In this systematic review, we aimed to explore the effects and practices of neuromonitoring during the open TAAA repair. A systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase via Ovid, Cochrane library and ClinicalTrialsGov until December 2022 was performed., Results: A total of 535 studies were identified from the literature search, of which 27 studies including a total of 3130 patients met the eligibility criteria. Most studies (21 out of 27, 78%) investigated the feasibility of motor-evoked potentials (MEP), while 15 analysed somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) and 2 studies analysed near-infrared spectroscopy during open TAAA repair., Conclusions: Current literature suggest that rates of postoperative spinal cord ischaemia can be kept at low levels after open TAAA repair with the adequate precautions and perioperative manoeuvres. Neuromonitoring with MEP provides the surgeon objective criteria to direct selective intercostal reconstruction or other protective anaesthetic and surgical manoeuvres. Simultaneous monitoring of MEP and SSEP is a reliable method that can rapidly detect important findings and direct adequate protective manoeuvres during open TAAA repair., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury (SCIRI) is a significant secondary injury that causes damage to spinal cord neurons, leading to the impairment of spinal cord sensory and motor functions. Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production is considered one critical mechanism of neuron damage in SCIRI. Nonetheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance of neurons to ROS remain elusive. Our study revealed that the deletion of Git1 in mice led to poor recovery of spinal cord motor function after SCIRI. Furthermore, we discovered that Git1 has a beneficial effect on neuron resistance to ROS production. Mechanistically, Git1 interacted with PGK1, regulated PGK1 phosphorylation at S203, and affected the intermediate products of glycolysis in neurons. The influence of Git1 on glycolysis regulates the dimerization of Keap1, which leads to changes in Nrf2 ubiquitination and plays a role in resisting ROS. Collectively, we show that Git1 regulates the Keap1/Nrf2 axis to resist ROS in a PGK1-dependent manner and thus is a potential therapeutic target for SCIRI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is still a feared complication for patients suffering from thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) who undergo endovascular treatment. The aims of this work are to review the available literature on different reperfusion methods of the aneurysm sac, and to analyze whether the different reperfusion methods, also in combination with other factors, are effective in reducing SCI risk and if the impact varies with the patient's age., Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE library was searched for studies published until November 2020 concerning TAAA, endovascular repair, and SCI preventive measures. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Primary outcome consisted of correlation between endovascular repair techniques (type A: single step; type B: staged approach with reperfusion branches; type C: staged sequential approach with positioning of the thoracic component). A logistic-weighted regression for each event (SCI, transient, and permanent) was then performed with type of treatment, age, and interaction between them as input factors. Finally, another logistic-weighted regression was performed to analyze the other relevant factors for which observations are available together with the endovascular technique., Results: Data from 53 studies with a total of 3095 patients were analyzed. Type A, type B, and type C endovascular strategies were adopted in 75%, 13%, and 12% of studied patients, respectively. Data showed that both type B and type C treatments are associated with lower risk of SCI, with a higher reduction of type C with respect to type B, although this positive trend is limited for elder patients. Moreover, a greater aortic diameter, a reduced aneurysm extent, and the absence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage positioning contribute to lower the risk of SCI. Concerning permanent SCI, both type B and type C are effective in reducing percentages for all ages, with type C treatment more beneficial for younger patients and type B for elder ones., Conclusion: According to the anatomy and the endovascular repair feasibility criteria, staged endovascular treatment appears to offer relevant advantages over single-step treatment in reducing the risk of SCI, regardless of the reperfusion method adopted.

Objectives: Spinal cord injury is detrimental for patients undergoing open or endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. The aim of this survey and of the modified Delphi consensus was to gather information on current practices and standards in neuroprotection in patients undergoing open and endovascular TAAA., Methods: The Aortic Association conducted an international online survey on neuromonitoring in open and endovascular TAAA repair. In a first round an expert panel put together a survey on different aspects of neuromonitoring. Based on the answers from the first round of the survey, 18 Delphi consensus questions were formulated., Results: A total of 56 physicians completed the survey. Of these, 45 perform open and endovascular TAAA repair, 3 do open TAAA repair and 8 do endovascular TAAA repair. At least 1 neuromonitoring or protection modality is utilized during open TAAA surgery. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage was used in 97.9%, near infrared spectroscopy in 70.8% and motor evoked potentials or somatosensory evoked potentials in 60.4%. Three of 53 centres do not utilize any form of neuromonitoring or protection during endovascular TAAA repair: 92.5% use CSF drainage; 35.8%, cerebral or paravertebral near infrared spectroscopy; and 24.5% motor evoked potentials or somatosensory evoked potentials. The utilization of CSF drainage and neuromonitoring varies depending on the extent of the TAAA repair., Conclusions: The results of this survey and of the Delphi consensus show that there is broad consensus on the importance of protecting the spinal cord to avoid spinal cord injury in patients undergoing open TAAA repair. Those measures are less frequently utilized in patients undergoing endovascular TAAA repair but should be considered, especially in patients who require extensive coverage of the thoracoabdominal aorta., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Managing patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysms is demanding yet fascinating, and requires a team effort. This invited talk presents lessons learned as our history with open and endovascular procedures evolved for 2578 descending and thoracoabdominal repairs over the past 20 years., Methods: Beginning in 1985 with an analysis of 596 traumatic aortic ruptures and the risk of spinal cord ischemia, the evolution of research and procedures for thoracoabdominal aneurysms progressed. The focus of these studies, medication trials, and procedure adjustments was on lowering the risk of spinal cord ischemia., Results: Between January 2002 and December 2021, 2578 aneurysm repairs were performed. The respective mortality rates were 6.8% and 4.0% for all patients treated. The permanent spinal cord ischemia rates were 1.3% for open descending thoracic aortas and 4.9% for open thoracoabdominal aneurysms. A detailed analysis of open and thoracoabdominal repairs showed better long-term outcomes with open repairs., Conclusions: Through multiple randomized trials and innovations with procedures and techniques, the risk of death and spinal cord ischemia have been reduced. Long-term survival has also been improved. The pursuit of reducing the risks of descending and ascending thoracoabdominal repairs is a fascinating endeavor that has resulted in better patient outcomes. Nevertheless, this is a journey, and there will always be more room to achieve even better results., (Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) with aortic aneurysm repair can cause significant neurological morbidity. Prevention of SCI is critical. We sought to identify risk factors that predispose to SCI that may guide strategies to mitigate the occurrence of SCI during and following these procedures., Methods: This study includes all adults who underwent atraumatic, unruptured, thoracic, and suprarenal aortic aneurysm repairs (endovascular or open) at our institution over 11 years (2010-2020). Our database included patient demographics, aneurysm anatomic features, and operative characteristics and an extreme gradient boost (XGB) machine method was used to develop a predictive model for SCI. The model was trained on an 80% randomly stratified cohort of the data and tested on the remaining 20% testing cohort. Shapley values were used to determine the most important predictive factors of SCI and decision trees were used to identify risk factor threshold values and highest risk factor combinations., Results: Information was collected for 174 adult patients undergoing thoracic and suprarenal aortic repair from 2010 to 2020. Fifty eight percent of the patients were male. Ninety seven (55.7%) patients had open aortic repair and 87 (44.3%) had endovascular repair. Twenty seven (15%) of all patients had major complications and were considered to have SCI. The XGB model converged over the training cohort with a testing cohort accuracy of 0.841 [Sensitivity = 75%, Specificity = 68%] and area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic of 0.774. The XGB model identified older age (> 65 years), history of neurologic disease, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, coronary artery disease, heart failure, poor renal function, < 6 months since last aortic repair, chronic anticoagulant use, preoperational anemia (Hemoglobin < 9), thrombocytopenia (platelet < 90,000), coagulopathy (prothrombin time > 15s and activated partial thromboplastin time > 40s), hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 70 mm Hg), longer operations (> 100 min), aneurysms longer than 5 cm, and anatomic location of aneurysm caudal to T-11 as risk factors for SCI in all types of aortic repair. Diabetic and heart failure patients undergoing longer operations (> 100 min) with thrombocytopenia or aneurysms longer than 5 cm were at the highest risk., Conclusions: The XGB model accurately identified risk factors of SCI with aortic aneurysm repair that may guide patient selection, timing of surgery, and strategies to minimize the risk of SCI., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potentials have been applied to monitor spinal cord ischemia during repair. However, their predictive values remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials on spinal cord ischemia during open distal aortic repair., Methods: Our group began routine use of both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials at the end of 2004. This study used a historical cohort design, using risk factor and outcome data from our department's prospective registry. Univariate and multivariable statistics for risk-adjusted effects of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials on neurologic outcome and model discrimination were assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves., Results: Both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials were measured in 822 patients undergoing open distal aortic repair between December 2004 and December 2019. Both motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials were intact for the duration of surgery in 348 patients (42%). Isolated motor evoked potential loss was observed in 283 patients (34%), isolated somatosensory evoked potential loss was observed in 18 patients (3%), and both motor evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential loss were observed in 173 patients (21%). No spinal cord ischemia occurred in the 18 cases with isolated somatosensory evoked potential loss. When both signals were lost, signal loss happened in the order of motor evoked potentials and then somatosensory evoked potentials. Immediate spinal cord ischemia occurred in none of those without signal loss, 4 of 283 (1%) with isolated motor evoked potential loss, and 15 of 173 (9%) with motor evoked potential plus somatosensory evoked potential loss. Delayed spinal cord ischemia occurred in 12 of 348 patients (3%) with intact evoked potentials, 24 of 283 patients (8%) with isolated motor evoked potentials loss, and 27 of 173 patients (15%) with motor evoked potentials + somatosensory evoked potentials loss (P < .001). Motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials loss were each independently associated with spinal cord ischemia. For immediate spinal cord ischemia, no return of motor evoked potential signals at the conclusion of the surgery had the highest odds ratio of 15.87, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.936, whereas motor evoked potential loss had the highest odds ratio of 3.72 with an area under the curve of 0.638 for delayed spinal cord ischemia., Conclusions: Somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials are both important monitoring measures to predict and prevent spinal cord ischemia during and after open distal aortic repairs. Intraoperative motor evoked potential loss is a risk for immediate and delayed spinal cord ischemia after open distal aortic repair, and somatosensory evoked potential loss further adds predictive value to the motor evoked potential., (Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We evaluated the outcomes of the selective intercostal artery reconstruction for preventing spinal cord injury during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair., Methods: We retrospectively assessed 84 consecutive patients who underwent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs between 2004 and 2016. The mean age of the patients was 57.3 years. We performed preoperative multidetector computed tomography in 74 patients (88.0%) to identify the Adamkiewicz artery. Spinal cord injury preventive measures included motor evoked potential monitoring, hypothermia induction, Adamkiewicz artery or other intercostal artery reconstruction, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage., Results: The hospital death rate was 5.9%, and paraplegia occurred in four patients (4.7%). The Adamkiewicz artery or other intercostal arteries were reconstructed selectively in 46 patients (54.7%). Of these patients, 41 underwent postoperative multidetector computed tomography, which revealed occlusion of the reconstructed grafts in 23 patients (56.0%). There was no paraplegia in the patients who underwent reconstruction of the Adamkiewicz artery, which was patent on postoperative multidetector computed tomography. Univariate analysis showed no significant effect of various risk factors on the development of spinal cord injury., Conclusion: Outcome of open surgery for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in our institution regarding spinal cord injury was satisfactory. The benefits of Adamkiewicz artery reconstruction remain inconclusive, and further larger studies are required to identify its validation for spinal cord protection in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Purpose of Review: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the biggest complications in open and endovascular aortic repairs. Historically, cerebrospinal fluid drains (CSFD) have been one of the most effective modalities in reducing SCI and one of the most studied. CSFD placement also carries its' own set of procedural risks. This editorial intends to evaluate recent literature to determine whether CSFDs remain a valuable tool in aortic repair., Recent Findings: As the surgical management of thoracic aortic aneurysms has evolved, there has been an increasing number of endovascular repairs. Current recommendations emphasize prophylactic CSFD placement in endovascular repair cases deemed 'high risk.' However, several meta-analyses differ on whether prophylactic CSFD placement reduced the risk of SCI. The incidence of SCI decreased between 2014 and 2018, despite a similar rate of prophylactic CSFD placement suggesting other techniques are being performed and may be effective in spinal cord protection as well., Summary: There has been conflicting data on whether CSFDs have a role in reducing the risk of SCI in endovascular aortic repair. Some studies suggest that there is no benefit to placement while others suggest that routine prophylactic drains should be placed for all endovascular cases. Despite this, efforts have been made to selectively place CSFDs in those patients deemed at 'high risk' for SCI. CSFDs also remain a part of rescue treatment for postoperative SCI. This suggests that CSFDs continue to be a valuable tool that we need to better comprehend. Future research is necessary to better understand how patient risk factors can be balanced with perioperative management to help identify patients who may benefit from CSFD placement., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal cord ischemia remains a devastating complication when treating patients with complex thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. This approach is progressively deployed. However, to date, no strategy has been identified to reduce the feared risk of spinal cord ischemia., Objective: To introduce a novel bypass technique using a customized composite graft to create a direct extra-anatomic revascularization before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in patients with high-risk of spinal cord ischemia., Methods: To demonstrate this novel concept, we present here a clinical case that reports the strategy of this novel concept in detail. An 83-year-old man with medical history of endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm and thoracic aorta presented with a type IA endoleak, located along the posterior superior aspect of the aortic stent graft adjacent to the lumbar arteries. A multidisciplinary plan was developed, which included a novel bypass from the profunda femoris to the left L1 radicular artery before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair to prevent spinal cord ischemia., Results: The patient successfully receives the novel extra-anatomic revascularization bypass before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. During the first implementation of this strategy, no intraoperative difficulties and postoperative complications were observed., Conclusion: This case demonstrates a novel surgical technique before fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for prevention of spinal cord ischemia. In addition, this concept provides a promising direction to not only complement the existing surgical techniques but also to generate more future innovations., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.)

Background: Postoperative complications of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm include paraplegia due to impaired blood flow in the spinal cord. Sivelestat sodium hydrate (ONO-5046), a specific neutrophil elastase inhibitor, can prevent neuropathy after ischemia-reperfusion of the spinal cord; however, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we examined whether ONO-5046 elicits its protective effects in spinal cord ischemia by affecting endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress., Methods: Forty-five male Japanese white rabbits (weight 2.5-3.0 kg) were assigned to three groups: a sham control group (n = 5), and two other groups (n = 20, respectively; n = 5 each time point) that were subjected to spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion for 15 min and administered saline or ONO-5046 intravenously. From 8 h to 7 d after resumption of blood flow, a neurological evaluation, histological evaluation of the spinal cord, and immunohistochemical evaluation based on the expression of GRP78 and caspase12 were performed., Results: Rabbits treated with ONO-5046 had fewer functional deficits and more surviving motor neurons after ischemia than did rabbits in the saline and control groups. In rabbits treated with ONO-5046, histological findings of the spinal cord showed a high number of viable motor nerves, whereas induction of GRP78, an ER stress response-related protein, was prolonged. Furthermore, caspase12 expression was activated by excessive ER stress and was downregulated in rabbits treated with ONO-5046, as compared with that in rabbits administered saline., Conclusions: ONO-5046 exerts a protective effect on the spinal cord by relieving ER stress during spinal cord ischemia.

Objective: This experimental study aimed to assess the efficacy of hydrogen gas inhalation against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury and reveal its mechanism by measuring glutamate concentration in the ventral horn using an in vivo microdialysis method., Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into the following 6 groups: sham, only spinal ischemia, 3% hydrogen gas (spinal ischemia + 3% hydrogen gas), 2% hydrogen gas (spinal ischemia + 2% hydrogen gas), 1% hydrogen gas (spinal ischemia + 1% hydrogen gas), and hydrogen gas dihydrokainate (spinal ischemia + dihydrokainate [selective inhibitor of glutamate transporter-1] + 3% hydrogen gas). Hydrogen gas inhalation was initiated 10 minutes before the ischemia. For the hydrogen gas dihydrokainate group, glutamate transporter-1 inhibitor was administered 20 minutes before the ischemia. Immunofluorescence was performed to assess the expression of glutamate transporter-1 in the ventral horn., Results: The increase in extracellular glutamate induced by spinal ischemia was significantly suppressed by 3% hydrogen gas inhalation (P &lt; .05). This effect was produced in increasing order: 1%, 2%, and 3%. Conversely, the preadministration of glutamate transporter-1 inhibitor diminished the suppression of spinal ischemia-induced glutamate increase observed during the inhalation of 3% hydrogen gas. Immunofluorescence indicated the expression of glutamate transporter-1 in the spinal ischemia group was significantly decreased compared with the sham group, which was attenuated by 3% hydrogen gas inhalation (P &lt; .05)., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated hydrogen gas inhalation exhibits a protective and concentration-dependent effect against spinal ischemic injury, and glutamate transporter-1 has an important role in the protective effects against spinal cord injury., (Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We investigated whether prophylactic preoperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was effective in preventing spinal cord ischemia (SCI) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair of degenerative descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, excluding dissecting aneurysms., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair involving proximal landing zones 3 and 4 between 2009 and 2020., Results: Eighty-nine patients with preemptive CSFD [68 men; median (range) age, 76.0 (71.0-81.0) years] and 115 patients without CSFD [89 men; median (range) age, 77.0 (74.0-81.5) years] were included in this study. Among them, 59 from each group were matched based on propensity scores to regulate for differences in backgrounds. The incidence rate of SCI was similar: 8/89 (9.0%) in the CSFD group and 6/115 (5.2%) in the non-CSFD group (P = 0.403). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio, 5.13; P = 0.004) and iliac artery access (odds ratio, 5.04; P = 0.005) were identified as positive predictors of SCI. Other clinically important confounders included Adamkiewicz artery coverage (odds ratio, 2.53; P = 0.108) and extensive stent graft coverage (&gt;8 vertebrae) (odds ratio, 1.41; P = 0.541) were not statistically significant. Propensity score matching yielded similar incidence of SCI: 4/59 (6.8%) in the CSFD group and 3/59 (5.1%) in the non-CSFD group (P = 0.697)., Conclusions: Aggressive use of prophylactic CSFD was not supportive in patients without complex risks of SCI., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) remains a devastating complication after aortic dissection or repair. A primary hypoxic damage is followed by a secondary damage resulting in further cellular loss via apoptosis. Affected patients have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Shock wave therapy (SWT) improves functional outcome, neuronal degeneration and survival in murine spinal cord injury. In this first-in-human study we treated 5 patients with spinal cord ischemia with SWT aiming to prove safety and feasibility. Methods and Results Human neurons were subjected to ischemic injury with subsequent SWT. Reactive oxygen species and cellular apoptosis were quantified using flow cytometry. Signaling of the antioxidative transcription factor NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) and immune receptor Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) were analyzed. To assess whether SWT act via a conserved mechanism, transgenic tlr3 -/- zebrafish created via CRISPR/Cas9 were subjected to spinal cord injury. To translate our findings into a clinical setting, 5 patients with SCI underwent SWT. Baseline analysis and follow-up (6 months) included assessment of American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, evaluation of Spinal Cord Independence Measure score and World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire. SWT reduced the number of reactive oxygen species positive cells and apoptosis upon ischemia via induction of the antioxidative factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2. Inhibition or deletion of tlr3 impaired axonal growth after spinal cord lesion in zebrafish, whereas tlr3 stimulation enhanced spinal regeneration. In a first-in-human study, we treated 5 patients with SCI using SWT (mean age, 65.3 years). Four patients presented with acute aortic dissection (80%), 2 of them exhibited preoperative neurological symptoms (40%). Impairment was ASIA A in 1 patient (20%), ASIA B in 3 patients (60%), and ASIA D in 1 patient (20%) at baseline. At follow-up, 2 patients were graded as ASIA A (40%) and 3 patients as ASIA B (60%). Spinal cord independence measure score showed significant improvement. Examination of World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaires revealed increased scores at follow-up. Conclusions SWT reduces oxidative damage upon SCI via immune receptor TLR3. The first-in-human application proved safety and feasibility in patients with SCI. SWT could therefore become a powerful regenerative treatment option for this devastating injury.

Objectives: Aortic steal is an underestimated risk factor for intraoperative spinal cord ischaemia. A negative effect on spinal cord perfusion in thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair has been suspected if blood drains away from the cord initiated by a reversal of the arterial pressure gradient. The amount of blood and pressure loss via back-bleeding of segmental arteries and the impact of distal aortic perfusion (DaP) have not been analysed yet. The aim of our study was to quantify 'segmental steal' in vivo during simulated thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair and to determine the impact of DaP on steal and spinal cord perfusion., Methods: Ten juvenile pigs were put on cardiopulmonary bypass with DaP and visceral arteries were ligated. 'Segmental steal' was quantified by draining against gravity with/without DaP. Blood volume of 'segmental steal' was quantified and microspheres were injected for Post mortem spinal cord perfusion analysis. 'Segmental steal' was quantified with/without DaP-and with stopped DaP., Results: Quantification revealed a significantly higher steal on cardiopulmonary bypass with DaP with a mean difference of 24(11) ml/min. In all spinal cord segments, blood flow was diminished during steal drainage on DaP, compared to 'no steal'. The least perfused region was the low thoracic to upper lumbar segment., Conclusions: 'Segmental steal' is a relevant threat to spinal cord perfusion-even with the utilization of DaP-diminishing spinal cord perfusion. The blood volume lost by back-bleeding of segmental arteries is not to be underestimated and occlusion of segmental arteries should be considered in thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after endovascular aortic repair is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Understanding of the pathogenesis and physiologic mechanisms of SCI dictates prevention and treatment when neurologic deficits occur. Currently used or proposed preventive modalities include staged repair, temporary aneurysm sac perfusion, segmental artery embolization, and management of hemodynamic parameters based on decades of experience with open thoracoabdominal and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The role of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in prevention of SCI remains an area of clinical equipoise. "Rescue maneuvers" when neurologic deficits develop are generally consistent and include cerebrospinal fluid drainage, hemodynamic management, and elevated hemoglobin goals. The role of team communication and education in expedient recognition and treatment initiation in SCI is paramount. Advances in spinal cord protective practices and new therapies in spinal cord injury may play a role in future prevention and treatment protocols. Additional research is needed to further define the optimal use of currently accepted and emerging therapies, and current management practices, to improve patient outcomes with regard to SCI after branched and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Paraplegia is a devastating complication in aortic aneurysm surgery. Modifying the spinal cord vasculature is a promising method in spinal cord protection. The aim of this study was to assess whether the spinal cord can be primed by occluding thoracic segmental arteries before simulated aneurysm repair in a porcine model., Methods: Twelve piglets were randomly assigned to the priming group (6) and the control group (6). Eight uppermost thoracic segmental arteries were occluded at 5-minute intervals in the priming group before a 25-minute aortic crossclamp. In the control group, the aorta was crossclamped for 25 minutes. During the first 5 minutes, 8 segmental arteries were occluded. After the aortic crossclamping, piglets were observed under anesthesia for 5 hours and followed up 5 days postoperatively. Near-infrared spectroscopy, motor-evoked potentials, blood samples, neurology with the modified Tarlov score, and histopathology of the spinal cord were assessed., Results: The median Tarlov score during the first postoperative day was higher in the priming group than in the control group (P = .001). At the end, 50% of the control animals had paraplegia compared with 0% of paraplegia in the priming group. The mean regional histopathologic score differed between the priming group and the control group (P = .02). The priming group had higher motor-evoked potentials during the operation at separate time points. The lactate levels were lower in the priming group compared with the control group (P g  = .001, P g×t  = .18)., Conclusions: Acute priming protects the spinal cord from ischemic injury in an experimental aortic crossclamp model., (Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of presented study was to investigate the model of non-invasive method of remote conditioning induced by compression of left forelimb with a tourniquet in three cycles of 2 min of ischemia each followed by 2 min of reperfusion and its influence on the rabbit spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury via ubiquitin-mediated stress response. Ubiquitin immunoreaction in spinal cord motor neurons as well as detection of neuronal survival in ventral horns of spinal cord were evaluated. Significantly increased (p < 0.001) number of ubiquitin positive neurons was registered in all remote conditioned groups versus both spinal cord ischemia (SC-ischemia) groups. Our results indicate that remote conditioning significantly attenuated degeneration of motor neurons in all conditioned groups versus SC-ischemia groups in each time point. According to our results, we concluded that the remote conditioning induced by transient limb ischemia is relevant stimulus that provides potent neuroprotection in a model of spinal cord ischemia/ reperfusion injury.

Background: Paraplegia after extensive aortic procedures is a disastrous complication, and maintenance of adequate spinal cord perfusion/oxygenation is pivotal to its prevention. Collateral network (CN) near-infrared spectroscopy (cnNIRS) has been introduced as a noninvasive method for indirect spinal cord oxygenation monitoring. However, the CN has not been investigated in its entirety using this monitoring modality. This study aimed to identify the optimal cnNIRS positioning in an acute large animal model for routine clinical use., Methods: The paraspinous CN was measured from the high thoracic region to the low lumbar region (T4-L5) using cnNIRS in 10 juvenile pigs (plus reference data from 7 animals) during aortic ischemia and reperfusion. These data were compared with data on direct regional tissue perfusion of the CN and the spinal cord., Results: After aortic cross-clamping, cnNIRS at the mid-thoracic to the low lumbar level decreased rapidly to a nadir at 10 minutes of distal ischemia (mean difference, 18.3 ± 11% to 44.5 ± 9%; P < .001 to .045), with more pronounced changes in the caudal regions. High thoracic cnNIRS remained stable (mean difference, 4.3 ± 4%; P = .915). Measurements of cnNIRS, CN, and spinal cord regional perfusion demonstrated comparable curve progressions starting from the mid-thoracic region (r = 0.5-0.7; P < .001)., Conclusions: cnNIRS is capable of detecting relevant changes during ischemia and reperfusion from the mid-thoracic level downward with characteristic oxygenation patterns corresponding to CN and spinal cord regional perfusion. For extensive aortic procedures, noninvasive cnNIRS placement appears to be useful from the mid-thoracic level (T7-T9) to the lower lumbar level (L3-L5) and also may serve as a versatile monitoring method for procedures limited to the proximal thoracic aorta., (Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: Spinal cord ischemia following open or endovascular aneurysm repair of the abdominal aorta is rare but highly disabling complication. The aim of this work is to report on its occurrence and its legal consequences., Methods: We report a case of spinal cord ischemia complicating an endovascular aortic repair, its management and sequalae, comparing it with the existing literature and we examine its legal consequences resulting in a malpractice lawsuit and the final decision of the judge., Results: Although the causal relation between SCI and the neurological deficits reported were assessed by the Court, no element of responsibility imputable to the Hospital or the Medical Staff were found, since the defendant had made every effort to prevent it in the preoperatory setting, and to treat it once it established in the post-operative phase., Conclusions: predictable but unpreventable complications of necessary interventions rule out medical malpractice, as long as the patient is fully informed about the risks and benefits of the treatment, and provided that in the perioperative setting all due measures are taken in order to prevent it and treat it.

Objectives: Despite the introduction of several adjuncts to improve spinal perfusion, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) remains a devastating complication of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Our aim was to assess the effects on clinical outcome of interventions triggered by motor evoked potentials (MEP) alerts. Furthermore, we want to assess whether a multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) protocol is helpful for stratifying patients according to the risk of SCI at the end of the vascular phase of surgery., Methods: We prospectively studied one-hundred consecutive patients who underwent TAAA repair. We applied a multimodal IONM including MEP, somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and peripheral nerve monitoring techniques. Signal deteriorations were classified as reversible/irreversible according to whether they recovered or not at the end of monitoring (EOM), set at the end of the vascular phase of surgery. Significant MEP changes drove a series of corrective measures aimed to improve spinal perfusion., Results: The rate of immediate postoperative motor deficits consistent with SCI was significantly higher with irreversible MEP deteriorations compared to reversible ones. The interpretation of MEP findings at the EOM led to the development of risk categories for SCI, based on the association between MEP results and motor outcome., Conclusions: Our data seem to justify interventions made to reverse MEP deterioration in order to improve the clinical outcome. A multimodal IONM protocol could improve MEP interpretation at the end of the vascular phase of surgery, supporting the surgeon in their decision-making, before concluding vascular maneuvers., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this survey was to evaluate the daily clinical practice in European hospitals regarding the modalities to prevent spinal cord ischemia, with an emphasis on cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD), in patients undergoing thoracic and thoracoabdominal endovascular repair., Design: A 21-item online survey on current practice of spinal cord protection with an emphasis on CSFD., Setting: Online service using Castor EDC software., Participants: Members of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and European Society of Vascular Surgeons., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: One hundred eighty invitations were sent and 104 were used for analysis. A majority of respondents used a written protocol for spinal cord protection during endovascular thoracic and thoracoabdominal repair (81/104 = 78%). The most common protective measures used were CSFD (79/81 = 98%), controlled hypertension (59/81 = 73%), drugs (11/81 = 14%), and hypothermia (6/81 = 7%). The two most common indications for placement of a spinal catheter were the length of the stent (83/104 = 80%) and location of aneurysm (71/104 = 68%). Preventive placement of the spinal drain (96/104) is the most common approach. In the subgroup of high-volume centers, 86% (12/14) of the respondents used a written protocol and all protocols include CSFD. Ninety-two percent (11/12) had included controlled arterial hypertension in the protocol compared with 70% (48/69) of the non-high-volume centers respondents., Conclusions: The majority of European centers use a written protocol that includes CSFD. This survey showed the similarities and differences in the management of CSFD in patients undergoing endovascular thoracic and thoracoabdominal repair., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)