Search

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly affects quality of life. Conventional treatments have had limited success. this study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PrMs) as a potential treatment for IBD., Methods: We conducted a thorough search of published literature on PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from 2000 to 2023. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a target population comprising of IBD patients receiving either S1PrMs or placebo and a comparison of the 2. The statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan (version 5.4). Forest plots presented the results as risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval., Results: A total of 7 RCTs involving 2471 patients were included. The results were reported for both the induction and maintenance phases of treatment. in the induction phase, the intervention group proved to have a significantly higher incidence of histological remission (RR = 2.67; 95% CI [1.97, 3.60]; P < .00001), endoscopic improvement (RR = 2.06; 95% CI [1.66, 2.56]; P < .00001), clinical remission (RR = 2.23; 95% CI [1.43, 3.46]; P < .0004) and clinical response (RR = 1.37; 95% CI [1.01, 1.84]; P = .04) compared to the placebo group. Outcomes assessed in maintenance phase significantly favored the intervention group over placebo as well, histologic remission (RR = 2.39; 95% CI [1.83, 3.11]; P < .00001), endoscopic improvement (RR = 2.20; 95% CI [1.28, 3.77]; P = .004), clinical remission (RR = 3.03; 95% CI [1.84, 4.99]; P < .0001), and clinical response (RR = 1.74; 95% CI [1.25, 2.42]; P = .001)., Conclusion: S1PrMs show promising potential for establishing histologic remission, endoscopic improvement, clinical remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission. With more studies and clinical trials, these modulators may become a reliable therapeutic choice for UC patients everywhere., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), continues to challenge treatment paradigms. Advancements in therapeutic options have been have been driven by Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of new drug classes, particularly sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators and interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors., Methods: This review synthesizes findings from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials conducted up to early 2024, focusing on the impact of S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors on IBD management. Drugs such as ozanimod, etrasimod, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab, and brasikumab were evaluated for their efficacy and safety profiles., Results: S1P modulators, such as ozanimod and etrasimod, effectively regulate immune cell trafficking to reduce inflammation and several trials highlight their clinical effectiveness in both inducing and maintaining remission in IBD, highlighting its long-term safety and sustained therapeutic effects. Additionally, IL-23 inhibitors including risankizumab, mirikizumab, and guselkumab, which disrupt key inflammatory cytokine pathways, have already shown significant effectiveness in inducing and maintaining remission in both CD and UC, with favorable safety profiles across multiple studies, suggesting their potential as critical components in managing IBD., Conclusions: The clinical trials indicate that both S1P modulators and IL-23 inhibitors offer promising therapeutic benefits and maintain strong safety profiles, positioning them as potential cornerstone treatments for IBD. Despite these advancements, further exploration into long-term safety and the development of personalized treatment strategies is essential for maximizing clinical outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) are an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This review summarizes all available randomized trial data on the efficacy and safety of S1PRM therapy., Methods: Multiple publication databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) of adults with moderate to severe UC treated with S1PRMs. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool, and the overall quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach., Results: We identified 7 RCTs (1737 patients) involving the use of S1PRMs for moderate to severe UC. During induction, S1PRM therapy was efficacious when compared with placebo for clinical remission [RR: 2.65 (95% CI: 2.00, 3.53)], clinical response [RR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48, 1.91)], endoscopic improvement [RR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.68)], endoscopic normalization [RR: 2.56 (95% CI: 1.58, 3.83)], mucosal healing [RR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.94, 4.26)], and histologic remission [RR: 2.42 (95% CI: 1.60, 3.66)]. Similar results were seen throughout the maintenance peroid, although fewer data were available to pool; notably, both sustained [RR: 3.57 (95% CI: 1.23, 10.35)] and steroid-free [RR: 2.92 (95% CI: 1.35, 6.33)] remission were significantly increased by S1PRM. There were no significant differences in adverse events [RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.15)] and infections [RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.60)] between S1PRM and placebo., Conclusion: Pooling of RCT data confirms that S1PRM therapy is both effective and safe for patients with moderate to severe UC., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The use of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) has led to a paradigm shift in the management of multiple sclerosis. A comprehensive narrative review was conducted through an extensive literature search including Medline and Google Scholar to elucidate the link between DMT and the propensity of cutaneous malignancies. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, such as fingolimod and siponimod are associated with a higher risk of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), but not squamous cell carcinoma, or melanoma. The associated physiopathological mechanisms are not fully understood. Alemtuzumab and cladribine show isolated associations with skin cancer. Regarding other DMT, no increased risk has ever been found. Given the evidence currently available, it is of paramount importance to advocate for necessary dermatological assessments that should be individualized to the risk profile of each patient. Nonetheless, additional prospective studies are still needed to establish efficient dermatological follow-up protocols., (Copyright © 2024 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Pivotal trials in ulcerative colitis have historically excluded patients with isolated proctitis. Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily in patients with isolated proctitis (centrally read) from the phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials., Methods: Patients, including those with isolated proctitis (<10 cm rectal involvement) who met all other inclusion criteria in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, were randomised 2:1 to receive etrasimod or placebo. Primary, secondary and other identified efficacy endpoints and safety were assessed., Results: We analysed data from 64 and 723 patients at Week 12 (both trials pooled), and 36 and 397 patients at Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52 only) with isolated proctitis and more extensive colitis (≥10 cm rectal involvement), respectively. Patients with isolated proctitis receiving etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo, including clinical remission rates at Weeks 12 (42.9% vs 13.6%) and 52 (44.4% vs 11.1%), endoscopic improvement (52.4% vs 22.7%) at Week 12 and bowel urgency numerical rating scale score at Week 12 (all p < 0.01). Generally similar trends were observed in patients with more extensive colitis. Safety was consistent across subgroups, with no new findings., Conclusions: Etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in patients with isolated proctitis, and those with more extensive disease, in most efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and 52. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03945188; NCT03996369., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether switching disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) from sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators to either natalizumab (NTZ) or dimethyl fumarate (DMF) could restore the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: This study included 9 controls and 33 patients with MS: 7 patients treated with DMF, 7 patients treated with NTZ, 9 patients treated with S1P receptor modulators, and 10 patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to DMF or NTZ by the second vaccine dose. The patients who had switched DMTs were classified into two groups, based on whether their lymphocyte counts were above or below 1000/μL at the time of vaccination. In addition, relapses within 6 months after switching DMTs were also evaluated in these patients. Six months after the second dose of the vaccination, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were evaluated in all participants, and spike specific CD4 + T cells were also assessed in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators., Results: Patients treated with S1P receptor modulators had lower levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies than the controls and patients treated with DMF and NTZ. On the other hand, in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators, a recovery of lymphocyte counts above 1000/µL resulted in restored humoral and cellular immune responses to the vaccination. There were no neurological relapses in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to NTZ., Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination is expected to be effective in patients whose lymphocyte counts have recovered due to switching DMTs from S1P receptor modulators. Switching DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to NTZ before vaccination may be beneficial in achieving efficacy for SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, with a reduced risk of relapse., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Tatsusada Okuno received research grants from Biogen and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. He has also received speaker fees from Biogen, Novartis and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. Ichino Chinen is an employee of Biogen Japan and owns stocks of Biogen. Makoto Kinoshita has received speaker fees from Biogen and Novartis. Hisashi Murata has received payment for lectures from Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. Hideki Mochizuki has received speaker fees from Biogen, Novartis and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators are small molecule drugs (SMDs) approved for IBD treatment. Their use in clinical practice might be limited due to cardiovascular concerns. We aimed to provide guidance on risk assessment, monitoring, and management strategies, aiming to minimize potential cardiovascular risks of SMDs and to facilitate an adequate shared decision-making. A systematic literature search was conducted, and proposed statements were prepared. A virtual consensus meeting was held, in which eleven IBD physicians and two cardiovascular specialists from ten countries attended. Proposed statements were voted upon in an anonymous manner. Agreement was defined as at least 75 % of participants voting as 'agree' with each statement. Consensus was reached for eighteen statements. Available evidence does not show a higher risk of cardiovascular events with JAK inhibitors in the overall IBD population, although it might be increased in patients with an unfavorable cardiovascular profile. S1P receptor modulators may be associated with a risk of bradycardia, atrioventricular blocks, and hypertension. Cardiovascular risk stratification should be done before initiation of SMDs. Although the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with IBD on SMDs appears to be low overall, caution should still be taken in certain scenarios., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest PAO declares no conflict of interest. AD reports fees for participation in clinical trials, review activities such as data monitoring boards, statistical analysis, and end point committees from Abivax, AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Dr Falk Foundation, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, and Pfizer; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Celltrion, Dr Falk Foundation, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Roche/Genentech, Sandoz/Hexal, Takeda, Tillotts, and Vifor Pharma; payment from lectures including service on speakers bureaus from AbbVie, Biogen, CED Service GmbH, Celltrion, Falk Foundation, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, High5MD, Janssen, Materia Prima, MedToday, MSD, Pfizer, Streamed-Up, Takeda, Tillotts, and Vifor Pharma; payment for manuscript preparation from Falk Foundation, Takeda, Thieme, and UniMed Verlag. MCD has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer Inc, Prometheus Laboratories, Takeda, and UCB. GP declares no conflict of interest. PGK: speaking and consultancy honorarium from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer and Takeda; Scientific grants from Pfizer and Takeda. ID has served as a speaker, consultant, or advisory board member for Takeda, Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Ferring, Roche/Genentech, Cambridge Healthcare, Celgene/BMS, Falk Pharma, Ierative Scopes, Rafa Laboratories, Neopharm, Arena, Gilead, Galapagos, Celltrion, Sublimity, Sandoz, Abbott, and Athos Therapeutics. TK has served as a speaker, a consultant or an advisory board member for AbbVie, Alfresa Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Covidien, EA Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, JIMRO, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Kissei, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Sekisui Medical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Zeria Pharmaceutical, and received research funding from AbbVie, Alfresa Pharma, EA Pharma, Gilead, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Otsuka Holdings, Pfizer, Sekisui Medical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Zeria Pharmaceutical. SG reports research grants from GSK, Abbvie; Drug Monitoring Committee from Janssen, Steering Committees from BMS, Receptos, Janssen, Abbvie, Gilead, Galapagos; Lecture fees from Takeda, Pfizer, Janssen, Abbvie, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Celltrion and consulting fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Galapagos, Celltrion, Ferring. FM has served as a speaker and received honoraria from Abbvie, Arena, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Ferring, Hospira, Janssen, Laboratórios Vitoria, Pfizer, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sandoz, Takeda, UCB, and Vifor. JRFN declares no conflict of interest. BS has consulted for AbbVie, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Endpoint Health, Falk Pharma, Galapagos, Janssen, Landos, Lilly, Pfizer, Prometheus, and Takeda; has received speaker fees from AbbVie, CED Service GmbH, Falk Pharma, Ferring, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda, and has received funding from Pfizer. SD has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Schering-Plough, AbbVie, Actelion, Alphawasserman, AstraZeneca, Cellerix, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Ferring, Genentech, Grunenthal, Johnson & Johnson, Millenium Takeda, MSD, NikkisoEurope GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Nycomed, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, UCB Pharma, and Vifor. LPB reports personal fees from Galapagos, AbbVie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Tillots, Celltrion, Takeda, Pfizer, Index Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Celgene, Biogen, Samsung Bioepis, Inotrem, Al-lergan, MSD, Roche, Arena, Gilead, Amgen, BMS, Vifor, Norgine, Mylan, Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Enthera, Theravance, Pandion Therapeutics, Gossamer Bio, Viatris, Thermo Fisher; grants from AbbVie, MSD, Takeda, Fresenius Kabi; and has stock options in CTMA., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

So far, only a small number of medications are effective in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). The sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor (S1PR)-1,5 modulator siponimod, licensed for progressive MS, is acting both on peripheral immune cells and in the central nervous system (CNS). So far it remains elusive, whether those effects are related to the neurotrophin brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). We hypothesized that BDNF in immune cells might be a prerequisite to reduce disease activity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and prevent neurotoxicity. MOG 35-55 immunized wild type (WT) and BDNF knock-out (BDNF ko ) mice were treated with siponimod or vehicle and scored daily in a blinded manner. Immune cell phenotyping was performed via flow cytometry. Immune cell infiltration and demyelination of spinal cord were assessed using immunohistochemistry. In vitro, effects on neurotoxicity and mRNA regulation were investigated using dorsal root ganglion cells incubated with EAE splenocyte supernatant. Siponimod led to a dose-dependent reduction of EAE scores in chronic WT EAE. Using a suboptimal dosage of 0.45 µg/day, siponimod reduced clinical signs of EAE independent of BDNF-expression in immune cells in accordance with reduced infiltration and demyelination. Th and Tc cells in secondary lymphoid organs were dose-dependently reduced, paralleled with an increase of regulatory T cells. In vitro, neuronal viability trended towards a deterioration after incubation with EAE supernatant; siponimod showed a slight rescue effect following treatment of WT splenocytes. Neuronal gene expression for CCL2 and CX3CL1 was elevated after incubation with EAE supernatant, which was reversed after siponimod treatment for WT, but not for BNDF ko . Apoptosis markers and alternative death pathways were not affected. Siponimod exerts both anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects, partially related to BDNF-expression. This might in part explain effectiveness during progression in MS and could be a target for therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Osteoporosis is the most common bone disorder, in which an imbalance between osteoclastic bone resorption and osteoblastic bone formation disrupts bone homeostasis. Osteoporosis management using anti-osteoclastic agents is a promising strategy; however, this remains an unmet need. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and its receptors (S1PRs) are essential for maintaining bone homeostasis. Here, we identified that Siponimod, a Food and Drug Administration-approved S1PR antagonist for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, shows promising therapeutic effects against osteoporosis by inhibiting osteoclast formation and function. We found that Siponimod inhibited osteoclast formation in a dose-dependent manner without causing cytotoxicity. Podosome belt staining and bone resorption assays indicated that Siponimod treatment impaired osteoclast function. Western blot and qPCR assays demonstrated that Siponimod suppressed the expression of osteoclast-specific markers, including C-Fos, Nftac1, and Ctsk. Mechanistically, we validated that Siponimod downregulated receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL)-induced Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways during osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, in a preclinical mouse model, Siponimod prevented ovariectomy-induced bone loss by suppressing osteoclast activity in vivo. Collectively, these results suggest that Siponimod could serve as an alternative therapeutic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been associated with a dampened humoral and/or cellular immune response in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who were concurrently on disease-modifying treatment (DMT) with B-cell depleting agents or sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Our main goal was to investigate the impact of these DMT classes on the clinical effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination., Methods: Since March 2020, demographics and clinical data of patients with MS who developed COVID-19 have been collected at the Belgian National MS Centre in Melsbroek. Patients were considered to be 'protected by vaccination' if they were (i) fully vaccinated and (ii) tested positive for COVID-19 in the period ranging from 14 days to 6 months after the last administered vaccine., Results: On 19 December 2022, 418 COVID-19 cases were retrospectively identified in 389 individual patients. Hospitalization and mortality rates resulting from the infection were 10.8% and 2.4%, respectively. Being 'unprotected by vaccination' was significantly associated with a worse COVID-19 outcome (i.e., hospitalization and/or death) in the total cohort (N = 418, odds ratio [OR] 3.96), in patients on ongoing DMT other than anti-CD20 agents or S1PRMs (N = 123, OR 31.75) and in patients without DMT (N = 182, OR 5.60), but not in those receiving anti-CD20 agents (N = 91, OR 0.39); the S1PRMs subgroup was considered too small (22 infections) for any meaningful analysis., Conclusions: Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination protects against severe infection in patients with MS but it was not possible to confirm this effect in those on DMT with B-cell depleting agents., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders pose a significant global health burden, highlighting the need for innovative therapeutic approaches. Fingolimod (FTY720), a common drug to treat multiple sclerosis, has shown promising efficacy against various neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Fingolimod exerts its neuroprotective effects by targeting multiple cellular and molecular processes, such as apoptosis, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and autophagy. By modulating Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor activity, a key regulator of immune cell trafficking and neuronal function, it also affects synaptic activity and strengthens memory formation. In the hippocampus, fingolimod decreases glutamate levels and increases GABA levels, suggesting a potential role in modulating synaptic transmission and neuronal excitability. Taken together, fingolimod has emerged as a promising neuroprotective agent for neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Its broad spectrum of cellular and molecular effects, including the modulation of apoptosis, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, autophagy, and synaptic plasticity, provides a comprehensive therapeutic approach for these debilitating conditions. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the mechanisms of action of fingolimod and optimize its use in the treatment of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: The transition from fingolimod (FIN) to siponimod (SIP) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) treatment in the occurrence of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) diagnosis has increasingly attracted considerable interest in the recent literature., Methods: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a direct switch from FIN to SIP in nine MS patients who had switched directly from FIN to SIP due to SPMS diagnosis at the Multiple Sclerosis Center of the University Hospital Policlinico of Bari., Results and Conclusion: Real-world results from our cohort demonstrated that the direct switch from FIN to SIP in patients transitioning in SP course is associated with clinical and disability progression stability, with a favorable safety profile., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To review the pharmacologic and clinical profile of etrasimod in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC)., Data Sources: A PubMed search was conducted from inception to November 2023 using the keywords etrasimod , ulcerative colitis , and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator . Information was also obtained from published abstracts and package insert., Study Selection and Data Extraction: Phase 2 and 3 studies plus relevant literature on etrasimod pharmacologic and clinical profile were reviewed., Data Synthesis: Per ELEVATE, 2 phase 3 studies, a higher proportion of patients with moderately to severely active UC achieved clinical remission in the induction and maintenance phase with etrasimod compared with placebo. In addition, a higher proportion of patients achieved secondary endpoints of clinical response, endoscopic improvement-histologic remission, corticosteroid-free remission, and endoscopic improvement with etrasimod vs placebo. Common adverse events include anemia and headache., Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice in Comparison With Existing Drugs: Etrasimod is now the second orally administered sphingosine-1-phosphate modulator approved for UC, providing patients with additional treatment options. Efficacy rates of this treatment are in line with other UC medication options. Similar to other sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, various assessments are required at baseline and during treatment to ensure safe and appropriate use., Conclusion: Etrasimod is another possibility in the armamentarium of UC treatment, providing patients with more oral medication options. Prior to treatment initiation, several assessments relating to safety, drug interactions, and pharmacogenomics factors are advised., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: David Choi has served on the speaker bureau for Janssen Pharmaceuticals. David Choi has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, and Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Shubha Bhat has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, Prometheus Laboratories, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Michelle Becker and Marina Ivanov have no conflicts of interest.

Background: Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is defined by the irreversible accumulation of disability following a relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) course. Despite treatments advances, a reliable tool able to capture the transition from RRMS to SPMS is lacking. A T cell chimeric MS model demonstrated that T cells derived from relapsing patients exacerbate excitatory transmission of central neurons, a synaptotoxic event absent during remitting stages. We hypothesized the re-emergence of T cell synaptotoxicity during SPMS and investigated the synaptoprotective effects of siponimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator, known to reduce grey matter damage in SPMS patients., Methods: Data from healthy controls (HC), SPMS patients, and siponimod-treated SPMS patients were collected. Chimeric experiments were performed incubating human T cells on murine cortico-striatal slices, and recording spontaneous glutamatergic activity from striatal neurons. Homologous chimeric experiments were executed incubating EAE mice T cells with siponimod and specific S1PR agonists or antagonists to identify the receptor involved in siponimod-mediated synaptic recovery., Results: SPMS patient-derived T cells significantly increased the striatal excitatory synaptic transmission (n=40 synapses) compared to HC T cells (n=55 synapses), mimicking the glutamatergic alterations observed in active RRMS-T cells. Siponimod treatment rescued SPMS T cells synaptotoxicity (n=51 synapses). Homologous chimeric experiments highlighted S1P5R involvement in the siponimod's protective effects., Conclusion: Transition from RRMS to SPMS involves the reappearance of T cell-mediated synaptotoxicity. Siponimod counteracts T cell-induced excitotoxicity, emphasizing the significance of inflammatory synaptopathy in progressive MS and its potential as a promising pharmacological target., Competing Interests: DC is the recipient of an Institutional grant from Novartis Pharma. No personal compensation was received. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Sanna, Bruno, Balletta, Caioli, Nencini, Fresegna, Guadalupi, Dolcetti, Azzolini, Buttari, Fantozzi, Borrelli, Stampanoni Bassi, Gilio, Lauritano, Vanni, De Vito, Tartacca, Mariani, Rovella, Musella, Centonze and Mandolesi.)

Background and Aims: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis [UC]. This post-hoc analysis of the phase 2 OASIS trial [NCT02447302] evaluated its efficacy for endoscopic improvement-histologic remission [EIHR] and assessed correlation between faecal calprotectin [FCP] and C-reactive protein [CRP] levels with efficacy outcomes., Methods: In total, 156 adults with moderately to severely active UC received once-daily etrasimod (1 mg [n = 52]; 2 mg [n = 50]) or placebo [n = 54] for 12 weeks. Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic variables were evaluated at baseline and Week 12. EIHR was defined as achievement of endoscopic improvement [endoscopic subscore ≤ 1, without friability] and histologic remission [Geboes score < 2.0]. Outcomes included the relationships between FCP and CRP concentration and clinical, endoscopic, and histologic variables., Results: Achievement of EIHR was significantly higher in patients who received etrasimod 2 mg versus placebo [19.5% vs 4.1%; Mantel-Haenszel estimated difference, 15.4%; p = 0.010]. In the etrasimod 2 mg group, median FCP and CRP levels at Week 12 were significantly lower in patients who achieved clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, histologic remission, and EIHR versus patients who did not [all p < 0.05]. An FCP concentration cutoff of 250 µg/g achieved optimum sensitivity and specificity for efficacy, including EIHR [0.857 and 0.786, respectively; κ coefficient, 0.3584]. Higher proportions of patients with FCP ≤ 250 µg/g achieved efficacy outcomes at Week 12 versus patients with FCP > 250 µg/g., Conclusions: Etrasimod was effective for inducing EIHR in patients with UC. FCP and CRP may be useful, noninvasive biomarkers to monitor treatment response., Clinicaltrials.gov Number: NCT02447302., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Background: Ozanimod showed efficacy and safety in the phase 2 STEPSTONE study conducted in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease., Aims: This analysis assessed the effects of ozanimod on circulating lymphocytes in Crohn's disease., Methods: Patients received ozanimod 0.92 mg for 12 weeks. Lymphocyte subtypes were evaluated using multicolor flow analysis on blood samples collected before treatment and on Week 12. Absolute lymphocyte count changes were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Disease activity changes and efficacy outcomes were evaluated at Week 12, and associations with lymphocyte subtype levels were assessed using Spearman's correlation and logistic regression., Results: Reductions in median total T, Th, and cytotoxic T cells occurred at Week 12 (45.4%-76.8%), with reductions in most subtypes of 47.5% to 91.3% (P < 0.001). CD8 + terminally differentiated effector memory cells were largely unaffected (median change, - 19%; P = 0.44). Reductions in median total B cells occurred at Week 12 (76.7%), with reductions in subtypes of 71.4% to 81.7% (P < 0.001). Natural killer and monocyte cell counts were unchanged. Greater baseline levels and changes in nonswitched memory B cells were significantly associated with clinical, endoscopic, and histologic efficacy (P < 0.05, all comparisons)., Conclusions: Ozanimod reduced circulating levels of all B-cell and most T-cell subsets but not monocytes or natural killer cells. Key subsets relevant to immune surveillance were not reduced, supporting the low risk of infection and malignancy with ozanimod in chronic inflammatory diseases. Levels of nonswitched memory B cells were associated with efficacy, providing a potential marker for ozanimod response., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02531113, EudraCT: 2015-002025-19., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background & Aims: Evaluating cardiovascular safety of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators is warranted due to S1P receptor expression on cardiomyocytes and vascular endothelial cells. This analysis reports the cardiovascular safety of ozanimod, an S1P receptor modulator, in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis from the phase 3 True North (TN) and open-label extension (OLE)., Methods: All patients who received ozanimod in TN (n = 796) and all eligible TN patients who entered the OLE (n = 823) were included. Cardiovascular-related adverse events were evaluated in patients with up to 146 weeks of ozanimod exposure (2219 patient-years), which included 52 weeks during TN., Results: On TN day 1, first-dose ozanimod resulted in a 0.2 beats per minute mean decrease in heart rate from pretreatment to hour 6; 2 patients experienced bradycardia, which resolved without treatment modification. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure increases of 5.1 and 2.2 mm Hg, respectively, were observed at TN week 52. No second-degree Mobitz type II atrioventricular block events were reported; 1 third-degree atrioventricular block unrelated to ozanimod occurred in the OLE. Cardiac and vascular treatment-emergent adverse events were infrequent (3.8% [31 of 823] and 8.5% [70 of 823]); no ozanimod-related cardiovascular deaths occurred. The incidences of deep-vein thrombosis (0.2%; 2 of 823), pulmonary embolism (0.2%; 2 of 823), and ischemic stroke (0.4%; 3 of 823) in the OLE were low., Conclusions: No new cardiovascular safety signals were identified, consistent with findings from previous ozanimod studies. There were few major adverse cardiovascular events or thromboembolic events, which were unrelated or unlikely related to ozanimod. Ozanimod has a well-tolerated cardiovascular safety profile when prescribed in accordance with the label. Clinical trial registry website and trial numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT02435992 and NCT02531126., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Recent pivotal phase 3 trials involving treatments like interleukin-23-, sphingosin-1-phosphate- and Janus kinase inhibitors have demonstrated notable effectiveness. However, they have also unveiled significant side effects such as herpes zoster, lymphopenia and bradycardia. The introduction of novel treatments raises valid concerns necessitating increased collaboration with diverse medical specialities to address potentially severe side effects, and this is vital for enhancing the future care of individuals with inflammatory bowel diseases, as argued in this review., (Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Introduction: Ozanimod regulates lymphocyte egress from the spleen and lymph nodes into the systemic circulation. The histological changes which occur in the lymph nodes of patients on ozanimod is unknown., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] undergoing total colectomy for treatment-refractory disease who received ozanimod, and a cohort of patients with UC undergoing colectomy who did not have ozanimod exposure. Histology of the lymph nodes from the mesentery of colectomy specimens was reviewed and multiple features were scored by experienced pathologists., Results: Six [13%] ozanimod-treated patients with UC required surgery for treatment-refractory disease. Colectomy specimen data were available for five patients [one patient had surgery at an outside centre]. Lymph node specimens from six control patients with UC who had colectomy were examined. Histological examination of lymph nodes showed that patients treated with ozanimod had significantly greater extent of dilated sinuses [p = 0.03] and greater degrees of sinus histiocytosis [p = 0.03] compared with control patients. In addition, there was a trend towards more Castleman-like angiotrophic hyperplasia, plasma cell infiltration, and subcortical interfollicular expansion in ozanimod-treated patients., Conclusion: This study identifies unique histological changes in the lymph nodes of patients with UC treated with ozanimod. The presence of sinus histiocytosis and dilated sinuses is in keeping with the known mechanism of action of ozanimod, and suggests that blocking lymphocyte egression from lymph nodes was insufficient to ameliorate disease severity in these patients. The possibility of Castleman-like features, identified in several of the cases, needs to be further investigated., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Despite the growing number of highly efficacious biologics and chemical drugs for ulcerative colitis (UC), steroid-free disease control is still difficult to achieve in subgroups of patients due to refractoriness, adverse events, primary or secondary failure. New treatments are therefore still required in order to optimize clinical management of patients with UC., Areas Covered: The efficacy and safety of both currently available and newly developed small molecules have been summarized. The PubMed database and clinicaltrials.gov were considered in order to search for phase 2b and 3 trials on new chemical drugs for UC. The study drugs reviewed included Janus kinases (JAK) and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1Pr) inhibitors, α4 integrin antagonist, and micro-RNA-124 upregulators., Expert Opinion: Rapidity of onset, low immunogenicity, and safety are the main characteristics of small molecules currently available or under evaluation for treatment patients with UC. Among the currently available chemical drugs, the selective JAK and the S1Pr inhibitors are characterized by a good safety profile combined with the ability to induce clinical remission in UC. A relatively low frequency of endoscopic improvement and healing currently appears associated with their use, being higher in UC patients treated with S1Pr inhibitor Etrasimod. Overall, additional new safe and effective drugs are still required in order to optimize disease control in a larger majority of UC patients.

Background and Objective: One sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator is approved (ozanimod) and another (etrasimod) is under investigation for the induction and maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis (UC). We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S1P modulators in patients with active UC., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through May 13th, 2023. We used the fixed-effect model to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: Five RCTs with a total of 1990 patients were included. S1P receptor modulators were significantly associated with increased clinical response during both the induction (RR 1.71 with 95% CI [1.50, 1.94], P = 0.00001) and maintenance phases (RR 1.89 with 95% CI [1.33, 2.69], P = 0.0004); clinical remission rates during both induction (RR 2.76 with 95% CI [1.88, 4.05], P = 0.00001) and maintenance phases (RR 3.34 with 95% CI [1.41, 7.94], P = 0.006); endoscopic improvement during both induction (RR 2.15 with 95% CI [1.71, 2.70], P = 0.00001) and maintenance phases (RR 2.41 with 95% CI [1.15, 5.05], P = 0.02); and histologic remission during both induction (RR 2.60 with 95% CI [1.89, 3.57] [1.17, 2.10], P = 0.00001) and maintenance phases (RR 2.52 with 95% CI [1.89, 3.37], P = 0.00001). Finally, there was no difference regarding safety outcomes as compared to placebo in both the induction and maintenance phases., Conclusion: S1P receptor modulators are effective in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with moderate to severe UC., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Three sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators are currently available as disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing MS in the Netherlands (i.e. fingolimod, ozanimod and ponesimod). We aimed to identify which S1PR modulator yields the highest benefit from a health-economic and societal perspective during a patient's lifespan., Methods: Incorporating Dutch DMT list prices, we used the ErasmusMC/iMTA MS model to compare DMT sequences, including S1PR modulators and eight other DMT classes, for treatment-naïve patients with relapsing MS in terms of health outcomes (number of lifetime relapses, time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 6, lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) and cost-effectiveness (net health benefit (NHB)). We estimated the influence of list price and EDSS progression on cost-effectiveness outcomes., Results: In deterministic and probabilistic analysis, DMT sequences with ponesimod have lower lifetime costs and higher QALYs resulting in a higher average NHB compared to sequences with other S1PR modulators. Ponesimod remains the most cost-effective S1PR modulator when EDSS progression is class-averaged. Given the variable effects on disability progression, list price reductions could make fingolimod but not ozanimod more cost-effective than ponesimod., Conclusion: Our model favours ponesimod among the S1PR modulators for the treatment of relapsing MS. This implies that prioritizing ponesimod over other S1PR modulators translates into a more efficacious spending of national healthcare budget without reducing benefit for people with MS. Prioritizing cost-effective choices when counselling patients contributes to affordable and accessible MS care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Cato E.A. Corsten and Beatrijs H.A. Wokke declare no conflicts of interest. Simone A. Huygens and Matthijs M. Versteegh are shareholders of Huygens & Versteegh which conducts research for government organizations and pharmaceutical companies, including research in MS. Ide Smets has received honoraria from Merck and Biogen Idec. Joost Smolders received lecture and/or consultancy fee from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Siponimod is a selective immunosuppressive medication, developed as the first oral therapy for active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. This medication acts by modulating the sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) receptor, as an antagonist of S1P1 and S1P5, thus preventing the egress of lymphocytes from lymph nodes and preventing inflammatory processes in the Central Nervous System that trigger demyelination. There is extensive scientific knowledge regarding the administration of the medication to patients, which will depend on their pharmacogenetic characteristics. Therefore, the FDA strongly recommends conducting a genotyping study of the enzyme that metabolizes siponimod, CYP2C9, whose genetic variants *2 and *3 classify patients as poor, extensive, or rapid metabolizers. Siponimod is completely contraindicated for patients who are homozygous for CYP2C9*3. Additionally, before prescribing it, an electrocardiogram, assessments of antibody status, ophthalmic evaluation, varicella vaccination status, and peripheral lymphocyte count should be conducted, as the medication's effect is dose-dependent. Therefore, a titration process is carried out starting from 0.25mg up to 2 mg. The pharmacotherapeutic protocol of siponimod is a reliable reflection of the utility of pharmacogenetics in personalized medicine.

Maladjusted immune responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), for example, cytokine release syndrome, may result in immunopathology and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive lipid mediator, and its S1P receptor (S1PR) are crucial in maintaining endothelial cell chemotaxis and barrier integrity. Apart from the S1P1 receptor-mediated mechanisms of sequestration of cytotoxic lymphocytes, including Th-17 and S1P1/2/3-mediated endothelial barrier functions, S1PR modulators may also attenuate cytokine release via activation of serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A and enhance the pulmonary endothelial barrier via the c-Abl tyrosine kinase pathway. Chronic treatment with fingolimod (S1PR1,3,4,5 modulator) and siponimod (S1PR1,5 modulator) has demonstrated efficacy in reducing inflammatory disease activity and slowing down disease progression in multiple sclerosis. The decision to selectively suppress the immunity of a critically ill patient with COVID-19 remains a difficult choice. It has been suggested that treatment with fingolimod or siponimod may be appropriate to attenuate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced hyperinflammation in patients with COVID-19 since these patients are already monitored in an intensive care setting. Here, we review the use of S1PR modulators, fingolimod and siponimod, in regulating the inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 with the aim of understanding their potential rationale use in patients with COVID-19.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological, immune-mediated demyelinating disease that affects people in the prime of life. Environmental, infectious, and genetic factors have been implicated in its etiology, although a definitive cause has yet to be determined. Nevertheless, multiple disease-modifying therapies (DMTs: including interferons, glatiramer acetate, fumarates, cladribine, teriflunomide, fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, ponesimod, and monoclonal antibodies targeting ITGA4, CD20, and CD52) have been developed and approved for the treatment of MS. All the DMTs approved to date target immunomodulation as their mechanism of action (MOA); however, the direct effects of some DMTs on the central nervous system (CNS), particularly sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor (S1PR) modulators, implicate a parallel MOA that may also reduce neurodegenerative sequelae. This review summarizes the currently approved DMTs for the treatment of MS and provides details and recent advances in the molecular pharmacology, immunopharmacology, and neuropharmacology of S1PR modulators, with a special focus on the CNS-oriented, astrocyte-centric MOA of fingolimod., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Y.K. declares no competing financial interests. JC has received grant support from Janssen, Novartis, and Bristol Meyers Squibb., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated disorder of the CNS manifested by recurrent attacks of neurological symptoms (related to focal inflammation) and gradual disability accrual (related to progressive neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation). Sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor (S1PR) modulators are a class of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing MS. The first S1PR modulator developed and approved for MS was fingolimod, followed by siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod. All are S1P analogues with different S1PR-subtype selectivity. They restrain the S1P-dependent lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes by binding the lymphocytic S1P-subtype-1-receptor. Depending on their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, they can also interfere with other biological functions., Areas Covered: Our narrative review covers the PubMed English literature on S1PR modulators in MS until August 2022. We discuss their pharmacology, efficacy, safety profile, and risk management recommendations based on the results of phase II and III clinical trials. We briefly address their impact on the risk of infections and vaccines efficacy., Expert Opinion: S1PR modulators decrease relapse rate and may modestly delay disease progression in people with relapsing MS. Aside their established benefit, their place and timing within the long-term DMT strategy in MS, as well as their immunological effects in the new and evolving context of the post-COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination campaigns warrant further study.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract that has a high epidemiological prevalence worldwide. The increasing disease burden worldwide, lack of response to current biologic therapeutics, and treatment-related immunogenicity have led to major concerns regarding the clinical management of IBD patients and treatment efficacy. Understanding disease pathogenesis and disease-related molecular mechanisms is the most important goal in developing new and effective therapeutics. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor (S1PR) modulators form a class of oral small molecule drugs currently in clinical development for IBD have shown promising effects on disease improvement. S1P is a sphingosine-derived phospholipid that acts by binding to its receptor S1PR and is involved in the regulation of several biological processes including cell survival, differentiation, migration, proliferation, immune response, and lymphocyte trafficking. T lymphocytes play an important role in regulating inflammatory responses. In inflamed IBD tissue, an imbalance between T helper (Th) and regulatory T lymphocytes and Th cytokine levels was found. The S1P/S1PR signaling axis and metabolism have been linked to inflammatory responses in IBD. S1P modulators targeting S1PRs and S1P metabolism have been developed and shown to regulate inflammatory responses by affecting lymphocyte trafficking, lymphocyte number, lymphocyte activity, cytokine production, and contributing to gut barrier function., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: There is no conflict of interest associated with the senior author or any of the other coauthors who contributed their efforts in this manuscript., (©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Glaucoma is a complex neurodegenerative disease characterized by optic nerve damage and apoptotic retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death, and is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Among the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors (S1PRs) family, S1PR1 is a highly expressed subtype in the central nervous system and has gained rapid attention as an important mediator of pathophysiological processes in the brain and the retina. Our recent study showed that mice treated orally with siponimod drug exerted neuroprotection via modulation of neuronal S1PR1 in experimental glaucoma. This study identified the molecular signaling pathway modulated by S1PR1 activation with siponimod treatment in RGCs in glaucomatous injury. We investigated the critical neuroprotective signaling pathway in vivo using mice deleted for S1PR1 in RGCs. Our results showed marked upregulation of the apoptotic pathway was associated with decreased Akt and Erk1/2 activation levels in the retina in glaucoma conditions. Activation of S1PR1 with siponimod treatment significantly increased neuroprotective Akt and Erk1/2 activation and attenuated the apoptotic signaling via suppression of c-Jun/Bim cascade and by increasing Bad phosphorylation. Conversely, deletion of S1PR1 in RGCs significantly increased the apoptotic cells in the ganglion cell layer in glaucoma and diminished the neuroprotective effects of siponimod treatment on Akt/Erk1/2 activation, c-Jun/Bim cascade, and Bad phosphorylation. Our data demonstrated that activation of S1PR1 in RGCs induces crucial neuroprotective signaling that suppresses the proapoptotic c-Jun/Bim cascade and increases antiapoptotic Bad phosphorylation. Our findings suggest that S1PR1 is a potential therapeutic target for neuroprotection of RGCs in glaucoma., (© 2022 The Authors. The FASEB Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.)

Background: Sphingosine-one phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulation inhibits S1PR1-mediated lymphocyte migration, lesion formation and positively-impacts on active multiple sclerosis (MS). These S1PR modulatory drugs have different: European Union use restrictions, pharmacokinetics, metabolic profiles and S1PR receptor affinities that may impact MS-management. Importantly, these confer useful properties in dealing with COVID-19, anti-viral drug responses and generating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses., Objective: To examine the biology and emerging data that potentially underpins immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus following natural infection and vaccination and determine how this impinges on the use of current sphingosine-one-phosphate modulators used in the treatment of MS., Methods: A literature review was performed, and data on infection, vaccination responses; S1PR distribution and functional activity was extracted from regulatory and academic information within the public domain., Observations: Most COVID-19 related information relates to the use of fingolimod. This indicates that continuous S1PR1, S1PR3, S1PR4 and S1PR5 modulation is not associated with a worse prognosis following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whilst fingolimod use is associated with blunted seroconversion and reduced peripheral T-cell vaccine responses, it appears that people on siponimod, ozanimod and ponesimod exhibit stronger vaccine-responses, which could be related notably to a limited impact on S1PR4 activity. Whilst it is thought that S1PR3 controls B cell function in addition to actions by S1PR1 and S1PR2, this may be species-related effect in rodents that is not yet substantiated in humans, as seen with bradycardia issues. Blunted antibody responses can be related to actions on B and T-cell subsets, germinal centre function and innate-immune biology. Although S1P1R-related functions are seeming central to control of MS and the generation of a fully functional vaccination response; the relative lack of influence on S1PR4-mediated actions on dendritic cells may increase the rate of vaccine-induced seroconversion with the newer generation of S1PR modulators and improve the risk-benefit balance IMPLICATIONS: Although fingolimod is a useful asset in controlling MS, recently-approved S1PR modulators may have beneficial biology related to pharmacokinetics, metabolism and more-restricted targeting that make it easier to generate infection-control and effective anti-viral responses to SARS-COV-2 and other pathogens. Further studies are warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Although considered to be irrelevant, EF, GP, LKJ and ASK have nothing relevant to declare. In the past 3 years DB has received honoraria for teaching and consultancy, unrelated to this work from inMuneBio, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Teva. GG has received honoraria and meeting support from AbbVie Biotherapeutics, Biogen, Novartis, Merck Sharp Dome, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Synthon, Teva. He also serves as chief editor for Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders and has been an academic director of the Neurology Academy, supported by Roche. KS has received research support from: Biogen, Merck KGaA, and Novartis and speaking/consultancy honoraria from: Biogen, EMD Serono, Medscape; Merck KGaA, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva, (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

As a critical sphingolipid metabolite, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) plays an essential role in immune and vascular systems. There are five S1P receptors, designated as S1PR1 to S1PR5, encoded in the human genome, and their activities are governed by endogenous S1P, lipid-like S1P mimics, or nonlipid-like therapeutic molecules. Among S1PRs, S1PR1 stands out due to its nonredundant functions, such as the egress of T and B cells from the thymus and secondary lymphoid tissues, making it a potential therapeutic target. However, the structural basis of S1PR1 activation and regulation by various agonists remains unclear. Here, we report four atomic resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of Gi-coupled human S1PR1 complexes: bound to endogenous agonist d18:1 S1P, benchmark lipid-like S1P mimic phosphorylated Fingolimod [(S)-FTY720-P], or nonlipid-like therapeutic molecule CBP-307 in two binding modes. Our results revealed the similarities and differences of activation of S1PR1 through distinct ligands binding to the amphiphilic orthosteric pocket. We also proposed a two-step “shallow to deep” transition process of CBP-307 for S1PR1 activation. Both binding modes of CBP-307 could activate S1PR1, but from shallow to deep transition may trigger the rotation of the N-terminal helix of Gαi and further stabilize the complex by increasing the Gαi interaction with the cell membrane. We combine with extensive biochemical analysis and molecular dynamic simulations to suggest key steps of S1P binding and receptor activation. The above results decipher the common feature of the S1PR1 agonist recognition and activation mechanism and will firmly promote the development of therapeutics targeting S1PRs.

Introduction: S1P receptor modulators are oral Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) for Multiple Sclerosis, which were associated with cases of basal cell carcinoma in clinical trials. This study aims at investigating in a real-world adverse event reporting system whether S1P receptor modulators increase the risk of skin cancer reporting, compared to other DMTs., Methods: Adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were extracted, cleaned, and analyzed from 2004Q1 until 2020Q4. The crude and adjusted Reported Odds Ratios (cROR, aROR) for the outcomes: basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or melanoma were calculated for all DMTs. In a sensitivity analysis, we looked at each outcome separately., Results: The aROR (95%CI) of siponimod was: 9.68 (5.48-15.79) and of fingolimod 4.54 (3.86-5.32), indicating a safety signal of S1P receptor modulators for skin cancer. Ozanimod had only 52 complete reports without any cases. In the sensitivity analysis, siponimod showed a signal only for basal cell carcinoma: 22.83 (12.27-38.83), while fingolimod for all outcomes separately, including melanoma: 3.02 (2.31-3.89). Notably, among the other DMTs, alemtuzumab: 4.40 (2.98-6.25) and cladribine: 3.28 (1.17-7.13) presented also a signal for disproportionate reporting, while ocrelizumab showed a signal in the sensitivity analysis only for melanoma 2.55 (1.21-4.65)., Conclusions: S1P receptors seem to increase skin cancer reporting on FAERS, and the association is strongest for basal cell carcinomas. Therefore, close dermatologic surveillance before- and during therapy is needed. Whether fingolimod and ocrelizumab also increase the risk of melanoma needs further investigation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ozanimod, a high selective sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P) receptor (S1PR) 1/5 modulator was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Additional S1PR modulators are being tested in clinical development programmes for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease., Aim: To provide an overview of advances in understanding S1PRs biology and summarise preclinical and clinical investigations of S1P receptor modulators in chronic inflammatory disease with special emphasis on inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)., Methods: We performed a narrative review using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov., Results: Through S1PRs, S1P regulates multiple cellular processes, including proliferation, migration, survival, and vascular barrier integrity. The S1PRs function of regulating lymphocyte trafficking is well known, but new functions of S1PRs expand our knowledge of S1PRs biology. Several S1PR modulators are in clinical development for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and have shown promise in phase II and III studies with ozanimod now being approved for ulcerative colitis., Conclusions: S1P receptor modulators constitute a novel, promising, safe, and convenient strategy for the treatment of IBD., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is a rare neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disease that has a significant impact on long-term physical and cognitive patient outcomes. A small percentage of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnoses occur before the age of 18 years. Before treatment initiation, a careful differential diagnosis and exclusion of other similar acquired demyelinating syndromes such as anti-aquaporin-4-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody spectrum disorder (MOGSD) is warranted. The recent 2017 changes to the McDonald criteria can successfully predict up to 71% of MS diagnoses and have good specificity of 95% and sensitivity of 71%. Additional measures such as the presence of T1-weighted hypointense lesions and/or contrast-enhancing lesions significantly increase the accuracy of diagnosis. In adults, early use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is instrumental to a better long-term prognosis, including lower rates of relapse and disability worsening, and numerous FDA-approved therapies for adult-onset MS are available. However, unlike their adult counterparts, the development, testing, and regulatory approval of POMS treatments have been significantly slower and hindered by logistic and/or ethical considerations. Currently, only two MS DMTs (fingolimod and teriflunomide) have been tested in large phase III trials and approved by regulatory agencies for use in POMS. First-line therapies not approved by the FDA for use in children (interferon-β and glatiramer acetate) are also commonly used and result in a significant reduction in inflammatory activity when compared with non-treated POMS patients. An increasing number of POMS patients are now treated with moderate efficacy therapies such as dimethyl fumarate and high-efficacy therapies such as natalizumab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies, and/or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These high-efficacy DMTs generally provide additional reduction in inflammatory activity when compared with the first-line medications (up to 62% of relapse-rate reduction). Therefore, a number of phase II and III trials are currently investigating their efficacy and safety in POMS patients. In this review, we discuss potential changes in the regulatory approval process for POMS patients that are recommended for DMTs already approved for the adult MS population, including smaller sample size for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, MRI-centered primary outcomes, and/or inclusion of teenagers in the adult trials., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: All agents engaging sphongosine-1-phospate receptors (S1PRs) will have some cardiovascular effect. This study aimed to elucidate the risk of cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with S1PR modulators (S1PRMs)., Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published through January 5, 2021. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were performed., Results: Seventeen RCTs (12 for fingolimod; 3 for ozanimod; 2 for siponimod) involving 13,295 patients were included. Compared with the control treatment, S1PRMs significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular AEs (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.58-3.10; I 2 , 75.6%). Notably, the high-risk cardiovascular AEs associated with S1PRMs were primarily bradyarrhythmia (RR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.91-4.46; I 2 , 30.8%) and hypertension (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.49-2.67; I 2 , 56.5%). Subgroup analysis results were consistent with the primary outcomes except that ozanimod was associated with a higher risk of hypertension only (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.10-2.82; I 2 , 0.0%), while siponimod was associated with a higher risk of bradyarrhythmia only (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.75-4.31; I 2 , 0.0%). No significant inter-subgroup differences were observed (P interaction > 0.05)., Conclusions: S1PRM use increased the risk of cardiovascular AEs by 1.21 times in patients with MS, and increased risks for bradyarrhythmia and hypertension were at 2.92- and 2.00-fold, respectively. These findings can help clinicians assess the risk of cardiovascular AEs in patients treated with S1PRMs., Systematic Review Registration: The PROSPERO ID is CRD42020183215., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Lv, Gu, Ma and Zhong.)

Ozanimod, a sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator that binds with high affinity selectively to S1P receptor subtypes 1 (S1P 1 ) and 5 (S1P 5 ), is approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) in multiple countries. Ozanimod profiling revealed a species difference in its potency for S1P 5 in mouse, rat, and canine compared with that for human and monkey. Site-directed mutagenesis identified amino acid alanine at position 120 to be responsible for loss of activity for mouse, rat, and canine S1P 5 , and mutation back to threonine as in human/monkey S1P 5 restored activity. Radioligand binding analysis performed with mouse S1P 5 confirmed the potency loss is a consequence of a loss of affinity of ozanimod for mouse S1P 5 and was restored with mutation of alanine 120 to threonine. Study of ozanimod in preclinical mouse models of MS can now determine the S1P receptor(s) responsible for observed efficacies with receptor engagement as measured using pharmacokinetic exposures of free drug. Hence, in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model, ozanimod exposures sufficient to engage S1P 1 , but not S1P 5 , resulted in reduced circulating lymphocytes, disease scores, and body weight loss; reduced inflammation, demyelination, and apoptotic cell counts in the spinal cord; and reduced circulating levels of the neuronal degeneration marker, neurofilament light. In the demyelinating cuprizone model, ozanimod prevented axonal degradation and myelin loss during toxin challenge but did not facilitate enhanced remyelination after intoxication. Since free drug levels in this model only engaged S1P 1, we concluded that S1P 1 activation is neuroprotective but does not appear to affect remyelination. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Ozanimod, a selective modulator of human sphingisone 1-phosphate receptor subtypes 1 and 5 (S1P 1/5 ), displays reduced potency for rodent and dog S1P 5 compared with human, which results from mutation of threonine to alanine at position 120. Ozanimod can thus be used as a selective S1P 1 agonist in mouse models of multiple sclerosis to define efficacies driven by S1P 1 but not S1P 5 . Based on readouts for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and cuprizone intoxication, S1P 1 modulation is neuroprotective, but S1P 5 activity may be required for remyelination., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s).)

The sphingolipids ceramide (Cer), ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P), sphingosine (Sph), and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)) are key signaling molecules that regulate many patho-biological processes. During the last decade, they have gained increasing attention since they may participate in important and numerous retinal processes, such as neuronal survival and death, proliferation and migration of neuronal and vascular cells, inflammation, and neovascularization. Cer for instance has emerged as a key mediator of inflammation and death of neuronal and retinal pigment epithelium cells in experimental models of retinopathies such as glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and retinitis pigmentosa. S1P may have opposite biological actions, preventing photoreceptor and ganglion cell degeneration but also promoting inflammation, fibrosis, and neovascularization in AMD, glaucoma, and pro-fibrotic disorders. Alterations in Cer, S1P, and ceramide 1- phosphate may also contribute to uveitis. Furthermore, use of inhibitors that either prevent Cer increase or modulate S1P signaling, such as Myriocin, desipramine, and Fingolimod (FTY720), have been shown to preserve neuronal viability and retinal function. Collectively, the expanding role for these sphingolipids in the modulation of vital processes in retina cell types and in their dysregulation in retinal degenerations makes them attractive therapeutic targets., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Fingolimod (FTY), a second-line oral drug approved for relapsing remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) acts in preventing lymphocyte migration outside lymph nodes; moreover, several lines of evidence suggest that it also inhibits myeloid cell activation. In this study, we investigated the transcriptional changes induced by FTY in monocytes in order to better elucidate its mechanism of action. CD14 + monocytes were collected from 24 RRMS patients sampled at baseline and after 6 months of treatment and RNA profiles were obtained through next-generation sequencing. We conducted pathway and sub-paths analysis, followed by centrality analysis of cell-specific interactomes on differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We investigated also the predictive role of baseline monocyte transcription profile in influencing the response to FTY therapy. We observed a marked down-regulation effect (60 down-regulated vs. 0 up-regulated genes). Most of the down-regulated DEGs resulted related with monocyte activation and migration like IL7R, CCR7 and the Wnt signaling mediators LEF1 and TCF7. The involvement of Wnt signaling was also confirmed by subpaths analyses. Furthermore, pathway and network analyses showed an involvement of processes related to immune function and cell migration. Baseline transcriptional profile of the HLA class II gene HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DPA1 were associated with evidence of disease activity after 2 years of treatment. Our data support the evidence that FTY induces major transcriptional changes in monocytes, mainly regarding genes involved in cell trafficking and immune cell activation. The baseline transcriptional levels of genes associated with antigen presenting function were associated with disease activity after 2 years of FTY treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Ozanimod, a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, is under investigation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease., Methods: We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ozanimod as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. In the 10-week induction period, patients in cohort 1 were assigned to receive oral ozanimod hydrochloride at a dose of 1 mg (equivalent to 0.92 mg of ozanimod) or placebo once daily in a double-blind manner, and patients in cohort 2 received open-label ozanimod at the same daily dose. At 10 weeks, patients with a clinical response to ozanimod in either cohort underwent randomization again to receive double-blind ozanimod or placebo for the maintenance period (through week 52). The primary end point for both periods was the percentage of patients with clinical remission, as assessed with the three-component Mayo score. Key secondary clinical, endoscopic, and histologic end points were evaluated with the use of ranked, hierarchical testing. Safety was also assessed., Results: In the induction period, 645 patients were included in cohort 1 and 367 in cohort 2; a total of 457 patients were included in the maintenance period. The incidence of clinical remission was significantly higher among patients who received ozanimod than among those who received placebo during both induction (18.4% vs. 6.0%, P<0.001) and maintenance (37.0% vs. 18.5% [among patients with a response at week 10], P<0.001). The incidence of clinical response was also significantly higher with ozanimod than with placebo during induction (47.8% vs. 25.9%, P<0.001) and maintenance (60.0% vs. 41.0%, P<0.001). All other key secondary end points were significantly improved with ozanimod as compared with placebo in both periods. The incidence of infection (of any severity) with ozanimod was similar to that with placebo during induction and higher than that with placebo during maintenance. Serious infection occurred in less than 2% of the patients in each group during the 52-week trial. Elevated liver aminotransferase levels were more common with ozanimod., Conclusions: Ozanimod was more effective than placebo as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; True North ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02435992.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

The sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) signalling pathways have important and diverse functions. S1P receptors (S1PRs) have been proposed as a therapeutic target for various diseases due to their involvement in regulation of lymphocyte trafficking, brain and cardiac function, vascular permeability, and vascular and bronchial tone. S1PR modulators were first developed to prevent rejection by the immune system following renal transplantation, but the only currently approved indication is multiple sclerosis. The primary mechanism of action of S1PR modulators in multiple sclerosis is through binding S1PR subtype 1 on lymphocytes resulting in internalisation of the receptor and loss of responsiveness to the S1P gradient that drives lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes. The reduction in circulating lymphocytes presumably limits inflammatory cell migration into the CNS. Four S1PR modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod) have regulatory approval for multiple sclerosis. Preclinical evidence and ongoing and completed clinical trials support development of S1PR modulators for other therapeutic indications., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JAC received personal compensation for consulting for Adamas, Atara, Bristol Myers Squibb, Convelo, MedDay, and Mylan, and for serving as an editor of Multiple Sclerosis Journal. MPM has served on scientific advisory boards for Genzyme and Genentech, received research funding from Novartis, and receives funding via a KL2 (KL2TR002547) grant from the Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences component of the National Institutes of Health., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) plays an important role in autoimmune disease. Here, we evaluated whether ponesimod, an S1P1 modulator, affects inflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and investigated Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg cell subsets. Ponesimod treatment ameliorated EAE and alleviated inflammatory infiltration. Compared with untreated EAE, ponesimod-treated mice had lower Th1 and Th17 cell numbers and higher Treg cell numbers; their IFN-γ, T-bet, IL-17, and RORγt levels as well as their pmTOR/mTOR ratio were diminished, while their TGF-β and Foxp3 levels were enhanced. These results suggest that ponesimod modulates the Th1/Th17/Treg balance and regulates the mTOR pathway., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: This analysis examined the long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis [UC] with ≥ 4 years of follow-up in the phase 2 TOUCHSTONE open-label extension [OLE]., Methods: Patients receiving placebo or ozanimod HCl 0.5 mg or 1 mg during the double-blind period could enter the OLE [ozanimod HCl 1 mg daily]. Partial Mayo score [pMS] clinical response and remission were assessed through OLE week 200 and summarized descriptively using observed cases [OC] and non-responder imputation [NRI]. Endoscopy was required at OLE week 56 and the end of treatment. Parameters associated with endoscopy were summarized at weeks 56 and 104 [OC], and week 56 [NRI]. C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin were assessed. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study., Results: Of 197 patients receiving double-blind treatment, 170 entered the OLE. Discontinuation rates were 28% at year 1 and 15-18% annually through year 4. Partial Mayo measures indicated clinical response and remission rates at OLE week 200 of 93.3% and 82.7%, respectively, using OC and 41% and 37% with the more conservative NRI analysis. At weeks 56 and 104, respectively, histological remission rates were 46.3% and 38.5%, and endoscopic improvement rates were 46.4% and 46.5% [OC]. No new safety signals were identified during ≥ 4 years of follow-up., Conclusions: There was a high rate of continued study participation and long-term benefit with ozanimod HCl 1 mg daily based on clinical, histological and biomarker measures in patients with moderately to severely active UC in the TOUCHSTONE OLE. [NCT02531126]., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. In recent years, many disease-modifying therapies (DMT) have been approved for MS treatment. For this reason, a profound knowledge of the characteristics and indications of the available compounds is required to tailor the therapeutic strategy to the individual patient characteristics. This should include the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic of the drug, the safety and efficacy profile provided by clinical trials, as well as the understanding of possible side effects. Moreover, the evolving knowledge of the disease is paving the way to new and innovative therapeutic approaches, as well as the development of new biomarkers to monitor the therapeutic response and to guide the clinician's therapeutic choices. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview on currently approved therapies in MS and the emerging evidence-based strategies to adopt for initiating, monitoring, and eventually adapting a therapeutic regimen with DMT., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Multiple sclerosis is a major socio-economical burden as it represents the most common cause of non-traumatic neurological disability in young adults [1]. It affects also children with a lower prevalence and incidence but remains a major concern as disability may occur later during their adulthood. Therefore, there is an absolute need for earlier diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we would focus on how these objectives can be achieved., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator regulates lymphocyte trafficking, resulting in its depletion from circulation, which ultimately causes immunosuppression. In this study, we investigated the preventive effect of fingolimod (FTY720) in the non-obese type 2 diabetic model, Spontaneously Diabetic Torii (SDT) rats. The S1P receptor modulator, FTY720 (0.3 mg/kg p.o.), was administered for 12 weeks to SDT rats from 5 to 17 weeks of age. Based on our findings, FTY720 could suppress the incidence of diabetes in SDT rats. Further, glucose intolerance was improved in FTY720-treated SDT rats at 14 weeks of age. Based on the haematological and histological analyses performed at 17 to 18 weeks of age, a decrease in lymphocytes and monocytes in the peripheral blood and a decrease in lymphocyte and atrophy in spleen occurred in the FTY720-treated SDT rats. Furthermore, the pancreatic changes, such as inflammation, atrophy, and fibrosis in islets observed in SDT rats were improved by FTY720 treatment. These findings suggest that the immunomodulatory effects of FTY720 reduced the pancreatic lesion in SDT rats, thereby demonstrating its preventive effect against diabetes. The development of diabetes in SDT rats is related to disorders of the immune system. However, the S1P receptor modulator may be useful for treating type 2 diabetes., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease that causes chronic neurological disability in young adults. Modulation of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors, a group of receptors that, among other things, regulate egression of lymphocytes from lymph nodes, has proven to be effective in treating relapsing MS. Fingolimod, the first oral S1P receptor modulator, has demonstrated potent efficacy and tolerability, but can cause undesirable side effects due to its interaction with a wide range of S1P receptor subtypes. This review will focus on ozanimod, a more selective S1P receptor modulator, which has recently received approval for relapsing MS. We summarize ozanimod's mechanism of action, and efficacy and safety from clinical trials that demonstrate its utility as another treatment option for relapsing MS.

Background and Purpose: The inflammatory response after traumatic brain injury (TBI) can contribute to secondary brain injury. RP101075, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, can attenuate various inflammatory responses. Here, we hypothesized that consecutive administration of RP101075 over 3 days could broadly suppress the TBI-induced inflammatory response and ameliorate the outcomes of TBI., Methods and Results: Young C57/BL6 mice were subjected to a controlled cortical impact (CCI) model. RP101075-treated mice exhibited significantly reduced scores on the modified neurological severity score (mNSS) test on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 after TBI, in comparison to TBI mice that received the vehicle. RP101075-treated mice had a remarkably decreased percentage of foot faults on the foot fault test on days 7, 14, and 21 after surgery, in comparison to TBI mice that received the vehicle. Using the wet brain weight/dry brain weight method, we found that RP101075 attenuated brain edema at 3 days post-TBI. According to the results of the Morris water maze (MWM), TBI mice treated with RP101075 exhibited reduced latency time and an increased percentage of target quadrant time from day 24 to day 25 after TBI, in comparison to TBI mice that received the vehicle. In addition, flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry showed that RP101075 markedly decreased the number of infiltrated T cells, B cells and NK cells at 3 days after TBI. Analysis of Western blot data showed that RP101075 lowered the expression of proinflammatory factors on day 3 after TBI., Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that consecutive administration of RP101075 over 3 days suppressed the TBI-induced inflammatory response and ameliorated neurological deficits after TBI. Thus, this procedure may be a potential treatment strategy for TBI in the clinical setting., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Recent studies have shown that oxidative stress plays an important role in MS pathogenesis. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between total oxidative stress (TOS) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC), which were reported to be effective in the pathogenesis of MS, and therapeutic efficacy of fingolimod used in the treatment of MS., Materials and Methods: Serum TOS and total TAC levels of 25 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) were measured before fingolimod treatment was initiated and in the third month of treatment and compared with those of 40 healthy individuals. Measurement of TOS activity was performed with TOS Assay Kit (Rel Assay Diagnostics, Turkey). Measurement of TAC activity was also performed with TAC Assay Kit (Rel Assay Diagnostics, Turkey)., Results: A statistically significant increase was observed in the TOS levels measured before fingolimod treatment in the patient group compared to the control group. The TOS levels measured in the third month of the treatment were found to decrease significantly compared to the pre-treatment TOS levels. An increase was observed in TAC levels after the treatment; however, no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of TAC levels. There was a positive correlation between the pre- and post-treatment Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and TOS values whereas no significant correlation was observed between the pre- and post-treatment EDSS scores and TAC values., Conclusion: The present study has revealed that fingolimod reduced oxidative stress. There was a positive correlation between the pre- and post-treatment EDSS and TOS values, which confirmed that there was a close correlation between the MS and oxidative stress. There are some limitations in this study. The small number of patients and the short follow-up times can be listed among these limitations. Our study does not contain a definitive answer to what is the mechanism of increased TOS in MS patients and how fingolimod reduces TOS levels. More detailed studies are needed on this subject., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)