Search

Objective: The study aims to elicit perceived benefits and downsides of X+Y scheduling for combined Internal Medicine-Pediatrics (Med-Peds) residents via focus groups., Methods: Five focus groups were conducted with Med-Peds residents in participating programs which utilized X+Y scheduling. Onefocus group was held per participating institution. Each focus group was facilitated by a chief resident from a different participating institution. Questions were developed by the study team after a review of the literature and local experience with X+Y scheduling and included open-ended questions. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed by study team members, and representative themes and quotes were presented. The main outcome was to evaluate the perceived benefits and downsides of X+Y scheduling for Med-Peds., Results: Results from four of the five focus groups were fully reviewed. Themes regarding the benefits of X+Y scheduling included (1) improved inpatient and outpatient experience, (2) predictability in schedule which improved wellness, and (3) longitudinal time for career exploration. Downsides of X+Y scheduling were highlighted as well including (1) condensing too many experiences into Y time and (2) challenges that exist when categorical medicine and pediatrics programs use different block schedules., Conclusions: X+Y schedules create potential solutions for longstanding barriers to medical education and notably conflict with inpatient and outpatient responsibilities. Our data shows similar benefits to X+Y scheduling for combined residents as for their categorical colleagues and sheds light on some unique considerations for combined programs and trainees. Additional studies should continue to assess the effect of X+Y scheduling on our combined trainees., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Szalda et al.)

Background: Medicine procedure services (MPS) increasingly perform bedside procedures, including lumbar punctures (LPs). Success rates and factors associated with LP success performed by MPS have not been well described., Objective: We identified patients undergoing LP by an MPS September 2015 to December 2020. We identified demographic and clinical factors, including patient position, body mass index (BMI), use of ultrasound, and trainee participation. We performed multivariable analysis to identify factors associated with LP success and complications., Main Outcome and Measures: We identified 1065 LPs among 844 patients. Trainees participated in 82.2%; ultrasound guidance was used in 76.7% of LPs. The overall success rate was 81.3% with 7.8% minor and 0.1% major complications. A minority of LPs were referred to radiology (15.2%) or were traumatic (11.1%). In multivariable analysis, BMI > 30 kg/m 2 (odds ratio [OR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.48), prior spinal surgery (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.87), and Black race (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.95) were associated with decreased odds of successful LP; trainee participation (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.51-4.12) was associated with increased odds. Ultrasound guidance (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.89) was associated with lower odds of traumatic LP., Results: In a large cohort of patients undergoing LP by an MPS, we identified high success and low complication rates. Trainee participation was associated with increased odds of success, while obesity, prior spinal surgery, and Black race were associated with decreased odds of success. Ultrasound guidance was associated with lower odds of a traumatic LP. Our data may help proceduralists in planning and assist in shared decision-making., (© 2023 Society of Hospital Medicine.)

Background: The population of older adults living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) continues to grow. MCC is independently associated with functional limitation and obesity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the association between obesity and MCC, and secondarily, the combined presence of obesity and functional limitations with MCC., Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from the National Health and Aging Trends Survey (NHATS) 2011 baseline data, a nationally representative Medicare beneficiary cohort of adults in the United States. We evaluated the coexistent prevalence of obesity and MCC overall, and by standard body mass index (BMI) categories. We then evaluated the prevalence of functional limitations (mobility, self-care, and household activities) and Fried-defined frailty status in persons with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 . Logistic regression was used to measure the association between MCC and BMI, and functional limitations and MCC among those with obesity., Results: In the 6,600 participants, the prevalence of concurrent obesity and MCC was 30.4%. Of those with obesity, the prevalence of MCC was 84.0%, and were more likely to have MCC (adjusted OR: 2.17, 95% CI 1.86, 2.54) compared to a normal BMI. Obesity and functional limitations or frailty were more likely have MCC than individuals with obesity alone., Conclusions: We found that individuals with obesity is strongly associated with MCC and that functional limitations and frailty status have a greater association with having MCC than individuals with obesity without MCC. Future longitudinal analyses are needed to ascertain this relationship., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)