Search

01 februari 2023, Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVES: Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended based on retrospective data and limited prospective studies. This study aimed to investigate whether TDM-guided voriconazole treatment is superior to standard treatment for invasive aspergillosis. METHODS: A multicentre (n = 10), prospective, cluster randomised, crossover clinical trial was performed in haematological patients aged ≥18 years treated with voriconazole. All patients received standard voriconazole dose at the start of treatment. Blood/serum/plasma was periodically collected after treatment initiation of voriconazole and repeated during treatment in both groups. The TDM group had measured voriconazole concentrations reported back, with dose adjustments made as appropriate, while the non-TDM group had voriconazole concentrations measured only after study completion. The composite primary endpoint included response to treatment and voriconazole treatment discontinuation due to an adverse drug reaction related to voriconazole within 28 days after treatment initiation. RESULTS: In total, 189 patients were enrolled in the study. For the composite primary endpoint, 74 patients were included in the non-TDM group and 68 patients in the TDM group. Here, no significant difference was found between both groups (P = 0.678). However, more trough concentrations were found within the generally accepted range of 1-6 mg/L for the TDM group (74.0%) compared with the non-TDM group (64.0%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, TDM-guided dosing of voriconazole did not show improved treatment outcome compared with standard dosing. We believe that these findings should open up the discussion for an approach to voriconazole TDM that includes drug exposure, pathogen susceptibility and host defence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT00893555.

01 februari 2023, Item does not contain fulltext, OBJECTIVES: Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended based on retrospective data and limited prospective studies. This study aimed to investigate whether TDM-guided voriconazole treatment is superior to standard treatment for invasive aspergillosis. METHODS: A multicentre (n = 10), prospective, cluster randomised, crossover clinical trial was performed in haematological patients aged ≥18 years treated with voriconazole. All patients received standard voriconazole dose at the start of treatment. Blood/serum/plasma was periodically collected after treatment initiation of voriconazole and repeated during treatment in both groups. The TDM group had measured voriconazole concentrations reported back, with dose adjustments made as appropriate, while the non-TDM group had voriconazole concentrations measured only after study completion. The composite primary endpoint included response to treatment and voriconazole treatment discontinuation due to an adverse drug reaction related to voriconazole within 28 days after treatment initiation. RESULTS: In total, 189 patients were enrolled in the study. For the composite primary endpoint, 74 patients were included in the non-TDM group and 68 patients in the TDM group. Here, no significant difference was found between both groups (P = 0.678). However, more trough concentrations were found within the generally accepted range of 1-6 mg/L for the TDM group (74.0%) compared with the non-TDM group (64.0%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, TDM-guided dosing of voriconazole did not show improved treatment outcome compared with standard dosing. We believe that these findings should open up the discussion for an approach to voriconazole TDM that includes drug exposure, pathogen susceptibility and host defence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT00893555.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib is an approved treatment for myelofibrosis patients, but data regarding patients with baseline thrombocytopenia are limited. The EXPAND study recently suggested tolerability of ruxolitinib, with a maximum starting dose of 10 mg 2 times a day (BID). However, the small sample size and vigorous follow-up in this trial hamper direct translation of these results to routine practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report retrospective data on Dutch ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis patients, focusing on those with baseline thrombocytopenia. Additionally, we reviewed current literature regarding ruxolitinib treatment in this subgroup. RESULTS: In our cohort, 12 of 119 patients had a baseline platelet count of < 100 x 10(9)/L. Spleen responses at a mean treatment duration of 25 weeks were documented in 1 of 6 and 15 of 47 patients with and without baseline thrombocytopenia, respectively. Despite a high rate of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia in thrombocytopenic versus nonthrombocytopenic patients (42% vs. 15%), no grade 3 or higher hemorrhage was reported. Median doses in thrombocytopenic patients were 15 and 10 mg BID at the start and after 12 weeks of treatment, respectively. Additionally, 238 thrombocytopenic patients were identified in the available literature, of whom 59 were treated in routine practice. Incidences of severe thrombocytopenia reported separately for patients with baseline thrombocytopenia were 30% to 59% (grade 3 or higher) and 4% to 60% (grade 4). Severe bleeding, pooled across our data and evaluable studies, occurred in 2.4%. CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib treatment appears to be safe for patients with platelet counts of 50 to 100 x 10(9)/L in real-life practice. We did not find any reason to discourage a starting dose of 10 mg BID in this subgroup.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib is an approved treatment for myelofibrosis patients, but data regarding patients with baseline thrombocytopenia are limited. The EXPAND study recently suggested tolerability of ruxolitinib, with a maximum starting dose of 10 mg 2 times a day (BID). However, the small sample size and vigorous follow-up in this trial hamper direct translation of these results to routine practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report retrospective data on Dutch ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis patients, focusing on those with baseline thrombocytopenia. Additionally, we reviewed current literature regarding ruxolitinib treatment in this subgroup. RESULTS: In our cohort, 12 of 119 patients had a baseline platelet count of < 100 x 10(9)/L. Spleen responses at a mean treatment duration of 25 weeks were documented in 1 of 6 and 15 of 47 patients with and without baseline thrombocytopenia, respectively. Despite a high rate of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia in thrombocytopenic versus nonthrombocytopenic patients (42% vs. 15%), no grade 3 or higher hemorrhage was reported. Median doses in thrombocytopenic patients were 15 and 10 mg BID at the start and after 12 weeks of treatment, respectively. Additionally, 238 thrombocytopenic patients were identified in the available literature, of whom 59 were treated in routine practice. Incidences of severe thrombocytopenia reported separately for patients with baseline thrombocytopenia were 30% to 59% (grade 3 or higher) and 4% to 60% (grade 4). Severe bleeding, pooled across our data and evaluable studies, occurred in 2.4%. CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib treatment appears to be safe for patients with platelet counts of 50 to 100 x 10(9)/L in real-life practice. We did not find any reason to discourage a starting dose of 10 mg BID in this subgroup.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib is an approved treatment for myelofibrosis patients, but data regarding patients with baseline thrombocytopenia are limited. The EXPAND study recently suggested tolerability of ruxolitinib, with a maximum starting dose of 10 mg 2 times a day (BID). However, the small sample size and vigorous follow-up in this trial hamper direct translation of these results to routine practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report retrospective data on Dutch ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis patients, focusing on those with baseline thrombocytopenia. Additionally, we reviewed current literature regarding ruxolitinib treatment in this subgroup. RESULTS: In our cohort, 12 of 119 patients had a baseline platelet count of < 100 x 10(9)/L. Spleen responses at a mean treatment duration of 25 weeks were documented in 1 of 6 and 15 of 47 patients with and without baseline thrombocytopenia, respectively. Despite a high rate of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia in thrombocytopenic versus nonthrombocytopenic patients (42% vs. 15%), no grade 3 or higher hemorrhage was reported. Median doses in thrombocytopenic patients were 15 and 10 mg BID at the start and after 12 weeks of treatment, respectively. Additionally, 238 thrombocytopenic patients were identified in the available literature, of whom 59 were treated in routine practice. Incidences of severe thrombocytopenia reported separately for patients with baseline thrombocytopenia were 30% to 59% (grade 3 or higher) and 4% to 60% (grade 4). Severe bleeding, pooled across our data and evaluable studies, occurred in 2.4%. CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib treatment appears to be safe for patients with platelet counts of 50 to 100 x 10(9)/L in real-life practice. We did not find any reason to discourage a starting dose of 10 mg BID in this subgroup.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: During an infection or inflammation, several drug-metabolizing enzymes in the liver are down-regulated, including cytochrome P450 iso-enzymes. Since voriconazole is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 iso-enzymes, the metabolism of voriconazole can be influenced during inflammation via reduced clearance of the drug, resulting in higher voriconazole trough concentrations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate prospectively the influence of inflammation on voriconazole metabolism and voriconazole trough concentrations. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed at the University Medical Center Groningen. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were >/=18 years old and treated with voriconazole. Voriconazole and voriconazole-N-oxide concentrations were determined in discarded blood samples. To determine the degree of inflammation, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were used. Subsequently, a longitudinal data analysis was performed to assess the effect of inflammation on the metabolic ratio and voriconazole trough concentration. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included. In total 489 voriconazole trough concentrations were included in the longitudinal data analysis. This analysis showed that inflammation, reflected by CRP concentrations, significantly influenced the metabolic ratio, voriconazole trough concentration and voriconazole-N-oxide concentration (all P < 0.001), when corrected for other factors that could influence voriconazole metabolism. The metabolic ratio was decreased by 0.99229N and the voriconazole-N-oxide concentration by 0.99775N, while the voriconazole trough concentration was increased by 1.005321N, where N is the difference in CRP units (in mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that voriconazole metabolism is decreased during inflammation, resulting in higher voriconazole trough concentrations. Therefore, frequent monitoring of voriconazole serum concentrations is recommended during and following severe inflammation.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: During an infection or inflammation, several drug-metabolizing enzymes in the liver are down-regulated, including cytochrome P450 iso-enzymes. Since voriconazole is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 iso-enzymes, the metabolism of voriconazole can be influenced during inflammation via reduced clearance of the drug, resulting in higher voriconazole trough concentrations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate prospectively the influence of inflammation on voriconazole metabolism and voriconazole trough concentrations. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed at the University Medical Center Groningen. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were >/=18 years old and treated with voriconazole. Voriconazole and voriconazole-N-oxide concentrations were determined in discarded blood samples. To determine the degree of inflammation, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were used. Subsequently, a longitudinal data analysis was performed to assess the effect of inflammation on the metabolic ratio and voriconazole trough concentration. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included. In total 489 voriconazole trough concentrations were included in the longitudinal data analysis. This analysis showed that inflammation, reflected by CRP concentrations, significantly influenced the metabolic ratio, voriconazole trough concentration and voriconazole-N-oxide concentration (all P < 0.001), when corrected for other factors that could influence voriconazole metabolism. The metabolic ratio was decreased by 0.99229N and the voriconazole-N-oxide concentration by 0.99775N, while the voriconazole trough concentration was increased by 1.005321N, where N is the difference in CRP units (in mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that voriconazole metabolism is decreased during inflammation, resulting in higher voriconazole trough concentrations. Therefore, frequent monitoring of voriconazole serum concentrations is recommended during and following severe inflammation.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: During an infection or inflammation, several drug-metabolizing enzymes in the liver are down-regulated, including cytochrome P450 iso-enzymes. Since voriconazole is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 iso-enzymes, the metabolism of voriconazole can be influenced during inflammation via reduced clearance of the drug, resulting in higher voriconazole trough concentrations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate prospectively the influence of inflammation on voriconazole metabolism and voriconazole trough concentrations. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed at the University Medical Center Groningen. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were >/=18 years old and treated with voriconazole. Voriconazole and voriconazole-N-oxide concentrations were determined in discarded blood samples. To determine the degree of inflammation, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were used. Subsequently, a longitudinal data analysis was performed to assess the effect of inflammation on the metabolic ratio and voriconazole trough concentration. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included. In total 489 voriconazole trough concentrations were included in the longitudinal data analysis. This analysis showed that inflammation, reflected by CRP concentrations, significantly influenced the metabolic ratio, voriconazole trough concentration and voriconazole-N-oxide concentration (all P < 0.001), when corrected for other factors that could influence voriconazole metabolism. The metabolic ratio was decreased by 0.99229N and the voriconazole-N-oxide concentration by 0.99775N, while the voriconazole trough concentration was increased by 1.005321N, where N is the difference in CRP units (in mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that voriconazole metabolism is decreased during inflammation, resulting in higher voriconazole trough concentrations. Therefore, frequent monitoring of voriconazole serum concentrations is recommended during and following severe inflammation.