Search

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with an increase in venous thrombotic and cardiovascular (CV) events has been reported during hospitalization. No systematic ultrasound follow-up to evaluate sequelae was ever that took place carried out prospectively associated with the evaluation of CV morbidity-mortality at 3 months post-discharge. Consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in the Amiens-Picardie University Hospital between 1st February and 31st August 2020 were included. The primary objective was the thrombosis incidence at 3 months after hospital discharge. Thrombosis was defined as either venous thromboembolism (VTE) or a CV event (CVE: myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or peripheral arterial disease). A secondary objective was to determine the risk factors for thrombotic events. We included 498 patients (279 men; 56%) of median age 66 (55-76) years. The primary composite outcome occurred in 27 patients (5.4%); 19 patients (3.8%) presented a CVE (stroke, n = 5; MI, n = 9; and peripheral arterial disease, n = 5). Two patients (0.8%) presented VTE. Six patients (1.2%) died. In multivariate analysis, a previous CVE was associated with thrombosis (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.17-8.24). COVID-19 was significantly associated with thrombotic events post hospital discharge. Special attention should be given to CVE in the follow-up of patients with a previous thrombotic event. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Late open conversion (LOC) following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a rare complication with a high morbidity and mortality and is often proposed as the last line of treatment after failure of endovascular reintervention of any type. This study aimed to highlights the limitations of EVAR follow-up imaging in characterizing endoleaks, which may contribute to the failure of endovascular reinterventions and lead to LOC., Methods: This retrospective cohort study recruited all EVAR implanted in Amiens University Hospital (France) between January 2008 and December 2022. Elective LOC was defined as surgical conversion >1 month after EVAR. The primary endpoint was the rate of wrong categorization of endoleaks by follow-up exams before LOC. Secondary endpoints were the morbidity and the mortality associated with LOC., Results: Seven hundred eight EVARs were performed in our institution, 30 required elective LOC. Twenty-five of them were treated for sac enlargement due to an endoleak (83.3%) (all types). Wrong categorization of the endoleak was noted in 13 patients (52.2%). Twelve of these recategorizations involved the preoperative diagnosis of a type II endoleaks (92.3%). The change in categorization in 7 out of 12 cases (58%) was in favor of a type I endoleak, other recategorization included 1 type III (8%) and 4 type IV (33%). One patient died during the 30-day postoperative period and 7 patients (28%) presented a major complication; the median length of stay was 13 days (interquartile range 9-21)., Conclusions: Routine follow-up examinations such as angioscanner and contrast Doppler ultrasound appear to be limited in their ability to categorize the type of persistent endoleak, which may increase the number of patients requiring LOC. New precision diagnostic imaging techniques, such as dynamic examinations, need to be developed to limit the need for LOC., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Long-term indwelling central venous catheters (CVC) are frequently used to secure vascular access to deliver injectable treatment. Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) occurs in approximately 2-6% of cancer patients. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to assess the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence in cancer patients; 200 patients were included. Mean age was 56 ± 15.15 years, median follow-up duration was 16.5 [range: 10-36] months. The incidence of recurrence was estimated using Gray's method for competing risk with death as the competing event of VTE. Recurrent VTE occurred in 25.5% of patients with a median occurrence time of 6.5 [range: 5-11.25] months. In case of recurrence, 94.6% of patients were treated for cancer and 80.4% of them received anticoagulants; 4 major bleeds and 17 non-major bleeds occurred during follow-up. In multivariate analysis, previous VTE (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.48 (95% CI 1.42-4.32) and presence of CVC (HR 5.56 (95% CI 1.96-15.75) were significant recurrence risk factors. After a first episode of CRT, 25.5% of patients experienced VTE recurrence as UEDVT in 30 cases (55.5%), PE in 17 cases (31.5%), and DVT in 7 cases (13%), mostly during anticoagulation therapy. Anticoagulation therapy does not avoid CRT in case of cancer and must be balanced with hemorrhagic risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: All authors state the absence of potential conflict of interest for this publication.

Based on the results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) assessing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), DOACs have been proposed as alternative to low molecular weight heparin by several international guidelines. However, the proportion of CAT patients who would have not been eligible for such trials is currently unknown. Our primary aim was to assess the proportion of patients seen in clinical practice for acute CAT who would not have been eligible for CARAVAGGIO or HOKUSAI-VTE RCT. Secondary aim was to describe patients outcomes according to eligibility. In a multicenter, observational study, all patients consecutively admitted from January 2017 to December 2019 for an acute CAT event were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of non-inclusion criteria for CARAVAGGIO or HOKUSAI-VTE RCT. Event free survival during a 6-month follow-up were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Among the 302 patients (women: 53 %, mean age: 67.9 ± 13.2) analyzed, 138 (46 %) for HOKUSAI-VTE cancer and 161 (53 %) for CARAVAGGIO met one or more non-inclusion criteria. Main criteria were upper limb and unsual site thrombosis (n = 63, 18.5 %), anemia/thrombopenia (n = 43, 14.2 %), brain tumors (n = 33, 10.9 %), ECOG PS >2 (n = 28, 9.3 %), severe renal failure (n = 16, 5.3 %). At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was not statistically different between the two groups. Almost half of CAT patients would have not been able to participate to a modern DOAC RCT. Evaluation of DOACs safety and efficacy in this subset of patients deserves further research., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Venous thromboembolic events are frequent complications of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs). The overexpression of tissue factor (TF) plays an essential role in the local hypercoagulable phenotype that underlies these complications. Our aim was to build an MRI radiomics model for the non-invasive exploration of the hypercoagulable status of LGG/GBM. Radiogenomics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and REMBRANDT (Repository for molecular BRAin Neoplasia DaTa) cohorts were used. A logistic regression model (Radscore) was built in order to identify the top 20% TF-expressing tumors, considered to be at high thromboembolic risk. The most contributive MRI radiomics features from LGG/GBM linked to high TF were identified in TCGA using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. A logistic regression model was built, whose performance was analyzed with ROC in the TCGA/training and REMBRANDT/validation cohorts: AUC = 0.87 [CI 95 : 0.81-0.94, p < 0.0001] and AUC = 0.78 [CI 95 : 0.56-1.00, p = 0.02], respectively. In agreement with the key role of the coagulation cascade in gliomas, LGG patients with a high Radscore had lower overall and disease-free survival. The Radscore was linked to the presence of specific genomic alterations, the composition of the tumor coagulome and the tumor immune infiltrate. Our findings suggest that a non-invasive assessment of the hypercoagulable status of LGG/GBM is possible with MRI radiomics.

Background: For complex extensive TASC-II D lesions, the standard of care remains conventional surgery. Nevertheless, guidelines tend to broaden endovascular surgery indications in expert centers for patients at high surgical risk with TASC-II D lesions. Due to the increasing use of endovascular surgery in this setting, we planned to evaluate the patency rate of this approach., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary center. All patients treated for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with classified D lesions according to the TASC-II classification and requiring management of the aortoiliac bifurcation were retrospectively included between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. The type of surgical approach was classified as a pure percutaneous approach or hybrid surgery. The main objective was to describe long-term patency results. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for loss of patency and long-term complications. The primary outcomes were primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency at 5 years of follow-up., Results: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included. For the overall population, the primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency proportions at 5 years were 71.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 63.2-81%), 82.1% (95% CI 74.9-89.3%), 96.3% (95% CI 92-100%), respectively. For primary patency, there was a significant difference in favor of the covered stent group at 36 months (P < 0.01) and 60 months (P = 0.037). In a multivariate model, only CS and age were associated with a better primary patency (hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, CI 95% [0.15-0.83], P = 0.0193 and an HR 0.07, 95% CI [0.05-0.09], P = 0.005, respectively). The overall rate of perioperative complications was 11%., Conclusions: We report that endovascular and hybrid surgery are safe and effective in the management of TASC-D complex aortoiliac lesions in mid to long-term follow-up. Short-term and long-term complications were all considered as minor., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate extracellular vesicles levels in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2's patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit with and without COVID-19 associated thromboembolic events., Methods: In this study, we aim to assess endothelial and platelet membrane-derived extracellular vesicles levels in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 patients with and without COVID-19-associated thromboembolic events who were hospitalized in an intensive care unit. Annexin-V positive extracellular vesicles levels were prospectively assessed by flow cytometry in one hundred twenty-three critically ill adults diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with a SARS-CoV-2 infection, ten adults diagnosed for moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection and 25 healthy volunteers., Results: On our critically ill patients, thirty-four patients (27.6%) had a thromboembolic event, Fifty-three (43%) died. Endothelial and platelet membrane-derived extracellular vesicles were drastically increased in SARS-CoV-2 patients hospitalized in the ICU compared to healthy volunteers. Moreover a slighty higher small/large ratio for platelets membrane-derived extracellular vesicles in patients was linked to thrombo-embolic events., Conclusion: A comparison between total annexin-V positive extracellular vesicles levels in severe and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection and healthy controls showed a significant increase in patients with severe infection and their sizes could be considered as biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 associated thrombo-embolic events., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Jacob, Lambour, Swinyard, Zerbib, Diouf, Soudet, Brochot, Six, Maizel, Slama and Guillaume.)

Background: Venous thromboembolism is a major complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We hypothesized that a weight-adjusted intermediate dose of anticoagulation may decrease the risk of venous thromboembolism COVID-19 patients., Methods: In this multicenter, randomised, open-label, phase 4, superiority trial with blinded adjudication of outcomes, we randomly assigned adult patients hospitalised in 20 French centers and presenting with acute respiratory SARS-CoV-2. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive an intermediate weight-adjusted prophylactic dose or a fixed-dose of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin during the hospital stay. The primary outcome corresponded to symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (fatal) pulmonary embolism during hospitalization (COVI-DOSE ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04373707)., Findings: Between May 2020, and April 2021, 1000 patients underwent randomisation in medical wards (noncritically ill) (80.1%) and intensive care units (critically ill) (19.9%); 502 patients were assigned to receive a weight-adjusted intermediate dose, and 498 received fixed-dose thromboprophylaxis. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism occurred in 6 of 502 patients (1.2%) in the weight-adjusted dose group and in 10 of 498 patients (2.1%) in the fixed-dose group (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.22-1.63; P = 0.31). There was a twofold increased risk of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding: 5.9% in the weight-adjusted dose group and 3.1% in the fixed-dose group (P = 0.034)., Interpretation: In the COVI-DOSE trial, the observed rate of thromboembolic events was lower than expected in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, and the study was unable to show a significant difference in the risk of venous thromboembolism between the two low-molecular-weight-heparin regimens., Funding: French Ministry of Health, CAPNET, Grand-Est Region, Grand-Nancy Métropole., Competing Interests: Dr. Zuily reports grants from French Ministry of Health, grants from The Grand Est Regional Council, grants from The Grand Nancy Métropole, grants from The Comité ad hoc de pilotage national des essais thérapeutiques et autres recherches sur le COVID-19 (CAPNET, label Priorité Nationale de Recherche–National Research Priority), during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Leo Pharma, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Viatris, personal fees from Sanofi, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Bayer, outside the submitted work; Dr. Lefevre reports grants from Gilead, grants from ViiV, outside the submitted work; Dr. Sanchez reports grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from MSD, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Inari, personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Leo Pharma, personal fees from Chiesi, grants from Oxyvie, outside the submitted work; Dr. Empis De Vendin has nothing to disclose; Dr. De Ciancio has nothing to disclose; Dr. Arlet reports grants from Addmedical, grants and other from Novartis, outside the submitted work; Dr. Khider has nothing to disclose; Dr. Terriat has nothing to disclose; Dr. Greigert has nothing to disclose; Dr. Robert has nothing to disclose; Dr. Louis has nothing to disclose; Dr. Trinh-Duc has nothing to disclose; Dr. Rispal has nothing to disclose; Dr. Accassat reports other from Leo Pharma, other from Janssen, other from MSD, outside the submitted work; Dr. Thiery has nothing to disclose; Dr. Montani reports grants and personal fees from Acceleron, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Bayer, outside the submitted work; Dr. Azarian has nothing to disclose; Dr. Meneveau reports grants, personal fees and other from Bayer, grants, personal fees and other from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants, personal fees and other from Pfizer, grants from Medtronic, grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, grants, personal fees and other from Abbott, personal fees from Inari, personal fees from Terumo, outside the submitted work; Dr. Soudet reports grants and personal fees from Leo Pharma, grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; Dr. Le Mao has nothing to disclose; Dr. Maurier has nothing to disclose; Dr. Le Moing has nothing to disclose; Dr. Quéré reports other from Leo Pharma, outside the submitted work; Dr. Yelnik has nothing to disclose; Dr. Lefebvre reports personal fees and other from Pfizer, other from Eumedica, outside the submitted work; Dr. Martinot reports other from Menarini, other from Overcome, outside the submitted work; Dr. Delrue has nothing to disclose; Dr. Benhamou has nothing to disclose; Dr. Parent reports grants from Oxyvie, personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work; Dr. Roy reports personal fees and other from Bayer, personal fees and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees and other from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees and other from Pfizer, personal fees and other from Aspen, personal fees and other from Sanofi, outside the submitted work; Ms. Presles has nothing to disclose; Dr. Goehringer has nothing to disclose; Dr. Mismetti reports personal fees from Bayer Healthcare, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Leo Pharma, personal fees from Aspen, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; Dr. Bertoletti reports grants from Bayer, grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees and other from Leo Pharma, personal fees and other from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees and other from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; Dr. Rossignol reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Cincor, personal fees from KBP, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from NovoNordisk, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Vifor/Relypsa, personal fees from Fresenius, personal fees and other from CardioRenal, personal fees from Idorsia, personal fees from Sequana, personal fees from Vifor, non-financial support from G3P, outside the submitted work; Dr. Couturaud reports grants and personal fees (board memberships, symposia or travel) from Bayer, grants and personal fees (board memberships, symposia or travel) from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, personal fees (board memberships, symposia or travel) from Merck Sharp and Dohme, personal fees (board memberships, symposia or travel) from Astra Zeneca, personal fees (board memberships or symposia) from Sanofi, personal fees (board memberships or symposia) from Janssen, personal fees (board memberships, symposia or travel) from Leo Pharma, outside the submitted work; Dr. Wahl has nothing to disclose; Dr. Thilly has nothing to disclose; Dr. Laporte reports personal fees from Lilly/Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Leo-Pharma, outside the submitted work., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Purpose of Review: Solid tumors often establish a locally hypercoagulant state that promotes vascular complications, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE). Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is associated with a broad range of hemostatic complications. Although VTE rarely occurs in ambulatory patients with OSCC, the coagulation cascade is typically activated by surgical resection and local hemorrhage. We present the recent progress in the understanding of the role and regulation of coagulation in OSCC., Recent Findings: Application of systems biology, using bulk tumor and single cell genomic analyses, unveiled the landscape of the tumor coagulome. Of all tumor types, OSCC express the highest mRNA levels of F3 and PLAU, the genes that encode the tissue factor (TF) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), the key regulators of coagulation and fibrinolysis, respectively. It also brought to light the intimate and reciprocal regulation between coagulation/fibrinolysis and the tumor microenvironment (TME)., Summary: OSCC have a specific coagulome, with consequences that likely extend beyond the vascular risk. We discuss the attractive possibility that biomarkers of the coagulation cascade might reflect some important characteristics of the TME, offering new opportunities to better understand the impact of surgical procedures, better predict their oncological outcome and improve current therapeutic approaches., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective:  D-dimer measurement is a safe tool to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE), but its specificity decreases in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Our aim was to derive a new algorithm with a specific D-dimer threshold for COVID-19 patients., Methods:  We conducted a French multicenter, retrospective cohort study among 774 COVID-19 patients with suspected PE. D-dimer threshold adjusted to extent of lung damage found on computed tomography (CT) was derived in a patient set ( n  = 337), and its safety assessed in an independent validation set ( n  = 337)., Results:  According to receiver operating characteristic curves, in the derivation set, D-dimer safely excluded PE, with one false negative, when using a 900 ng/mL threshold when lung damage extent was <50% and 1,700 ng/mL when lung damage extent was ≥50%. In the derivation set, the algorithm sensitivity was 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.7-100.0) and its specificity 28.4% (95% CI: 24.1-32.3). The negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.44) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67). In the validation set, sensitivity and specificity were 96.7% (95% CI: 88.7-99.6) and 39.2% (95% CI: 32.2-46.1), respectively. The NLR was 0.08 (95% CI; 0.02-0.33), and the AUC did not differ from that of the derivation set (0.68, 95% CI: 0.64-0.72, p  = 0.097). Using the Co-LEAD algorithm, 76 among 250 (30.4%) COVID-19 patients with suspected PE could have been managed without CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and 88 patients would have required two CTs., Conclusion:  The Co-LEAD algorithm could safely exclude PE, and could reduce the use of CTPA in COVID-19 patients. Further prospective studies need to validate this strategy., Competing Interests: T.M. reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bayer Healthcare SAS, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Incyte Biosciences, France, nonfinancial support from Alexion Pharma, France, nonfinancial support from Abbott, France, nonfinancial support from Amgen SAS, nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, France, nonfinancial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, no-financial support from MSD France, outside the submitted work; F.C. reports grants from Pfizer, personal fees from Bayer, other from Boehringer; grants, personal fees, and other from BMS; personal fees and other from Astra-Zeneca, other from GSK, personal fees from LEO-Pharma, other from Actelion, outside the submitted work; S.S. reports grants from LEO-Pharma, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from BMS Pfizer, outside the submitted work; N.G. reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bayer, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, personal fees from LEO-Pharma, personal fees from Aspen, outside the submitted work; O.S. reports grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Bayer; grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from BMS; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Sanofi Aventis; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boston Scientifics; personal fees from Pfizer; grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from MSD; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; grants from Daiichi Sankyo; personal fees from Chiesi; personal fees and nonfinancial support from BTG, outside the submitted work; L.K. reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, outside the submitted work; M.A.S. reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bayer SA, grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Leo-Pharma, personal fees from Aspen, outside the submitted work; R.C. reports personal fees from Aspen, outside the submitted work; D.M.S. reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, personal fees from Leo-Pharma, personal fees from Aspen, personal fees from Carmat, outside the submitted work; E.M. reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bayer, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work; . N.M. reports grants and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare, grants and personal fees from BMS Pfizer, personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, personal fees from Terumo, grants and personal fees from Abbott, outside the submitted work; L.F. reports personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from General Electrics, nonfinancial support from Guerbet, grants from Invectys, nonfinancial support from Philips, nonfinancial support from Ariana Pharma, nonfinancial support from Evolucare, outside the submitted work. All the other authors have nothing to declare., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Cardiovascular disease, particularly myocardial infarction, is the leading cause of death of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The usefulness of the coronary artery calcification score (CACS), determined using cardiac computed-tomography (CT)-scan images, was assessed as a part of a cardiovascular work-up of RA patients at low or intermediate cardiovascular disease risk. This descriptive, cross-sectional, single-center study was conducted on patients with stable RA or that which is in remission. Each patient’s work-up included a collection of cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory analyses, an electrocardiogram, a supra-aortic trunks (SATs) echo-Doppler test and a cardiac CT scan. The primary endpoint was to determine the frequency of patients with a CACS > 100, indicating notable atherosclerosis. Fifty patients were analyzed: mean ± standard deviation age was 53.7 ± 7.5 years, 82% women. The CACS exceeded 100 in 12 (24%) patients (11 were at intermediate risk) and 2 of them underwent angioplasty for silent myocardial ischemia. Cardiovascular risk was reclassified from intermediate to high for 5 patients. Age according to sex and smoking status were significantly associated with that increase; no association was found with RA characteristics or treatments.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality; however, data on its etiology and evolution in patients under 50 years old are scarce. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of data from medical records, including cardiovascular risk factors, etiology, medical and surgical treatment, and follow-up. We included all patients with PAD aged between 18 and 50 years attending our university hospital between 2005 and 2015. Of the 87 patients included, 32 (36%) were women. Smoking was acknowledged by 81 patients (93%), and 37 had dyslipidemia (42.5%). Median follow-up was 24 months (10-59). Recurrence occurred in 41 patients (47.1%), all active smokers, with a median delay of 14 months (7-47). Acute limb ischemia at diagnosis was significantly associated with major amputation, odds ratio (OR) 5.95 (95%CI 1.41-40.90, P = .029), which was needed by 11 patients (12.6%). Treatments included antiplatelet therapy (76; 87.4%), statins (67; 77%), and anti-hypertensives (60; 69%), and 29 (32.1%) patients benefited from vascular rehabilitation. This cohort of relatively young patients with PAD showed a high level of symptom recurrence. Atherosclerosis was the most common etiology. Our study revealed that medical treatment is often under-prescribed in this age group and needs to be improved.