Search

Josefina Marin, María Laura Acosta Felquer, Enrique R Soriano Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medical Serivces, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a pegylated humanized tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) approved for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the USA and for AS and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) in Europe and in some Latin American countries. CZP lacks Fc region, preventing complement fixation and cytotoxicity mediated by antibody; CZP does not actively cross the placenta, unlike other TNFi. RAPID-axSpA study is a Phase III trial conducted in patients with AS and nr-axSpA as double blind and placebo controlled to week 24, dose blind to week 48 and open label to week 204. Of a total of 325 patients recruited, 107 patients were assigned to placebo and 218 patients to CZP (111 to CZP 200 mg Q2W, 107 to CZP 400 mg Q4W). Improvements in axial involvement, joint involvement, enthesitis and quality of life were reported in patients treated with CZP. Safety profile was like that reported for other TNFi in axSpA patients. In this article, we summarized the pharmacology and we reviewed the efficacy and tolerability of this drug for the treatment of axSpA. Some special considerations of CZP during pregnancy are included. CZP, the latest TNFi to be approved, showed efficacy in all manifestations of AS and nr-axSpA. Keywords: certolizumab pegol, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, efficacy, safety

María Laura Acosta-Felquer, Javier Rosa, Enrique R SorianoRheumatology Unit, Internal Medical Services, and University Institute, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaAbstract: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a pegylated humanized tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Europe, the USA, and Latin American countries. CZP neutralizes TNF-α at its soluble and membrane portions. Due to the lack of Fc region, it does not induce complement or antibody-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro, unlike other TNFi. RAPID-PsA study, the only randomized clinical trial performed in PsA, is a Phase III clinical trial conducted in 409 PsA patients during 24 weeks. Patients were randomized to CZP (200 mg every 2 weeks or 400 mg every 4 weeks) or placebo. Patients in CZP arms reported improvements in skin disease, joint involvement, dactylitis, enthesitis, and quality of life. Safety profile was similar to that reported for other TNF-α inhibitors in PsA patients. This article summarizes the pharmacology and reviews the efficacy and tolerability of this drug in PsA. CZP is the newest TNFi with proved efficacy in all manifestations of psoriasis disease, except for axial involvement where the evidence has been derived from response to axial spondyloarthritis.Keywords: certolizumab pegol, tumor necrosis factor- inhibitors, psoriatic arthritis, efficacy, safety

Erika Catay,1 Cecilia Castel del Cid,1 Lorena Narváez,1 Edson J Velozo,1 Javier E Rosa,1,2 Luis J Catoggio,1,2 Enrique R Soriano1,21Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, 2University Institute Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, School of Medicine, PM Catoggio Foundation, Buenos Aires, ArgentinaBackground: The present study aimed to estimate the cost of rheumatoid arthritis and its components in a university hospital-based health management organization in Argentina, during the prebiologic era.Methods: A one-year (2002) observational prevalence, cost-of illness study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the societal perspective was performed in a hospital-based health management organization population. Direct medical costs were obtained using administrative databases. Direct nonmedical and indirect costs were obtained from a semistructured questionnaire. Indirect costs included work absenteeism, permanent work disability, and housework lost for housewives, using the human capital approach. Costs are expressed in 2002 US dollars per patient per year.Results: A total of 165 patients (84% females), of mean age 61 ± 15 years and with a mean disease duration of 8.5 ± 8.3 years were included. Mean total direct medical costs were US$1862 (95% confidence interval [CI] 828–2899). Mean direct nonmedical costs were US$222 (95% CI 149–294). Mean indirect costs were US$1008 (95% CI 606–1412). The annual mean total cost was US$3093 without biologics. Hospitalizations represented 73% of total direct medical costs while drugs and outpatient procedures represented 16% and 8% of total direct medical costs, respectively. Sixty percent of the total costs were related to direct medical costs, while indirect costs represented 33% of total costs.Conclusion: In our population, annual mean total costs in the prebiologic therapy era were mainly driven by direct medical costs. Even without the use of biologic agents, rheumatoid arthritis represents an important burden for society in developing countries.Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, economics, burden of illness, cost of illness

Objectives: To evaluate the association between learned helplessness (LH) and self-efficacy (SE) with disease activity, functional capacity, and level of pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare LH and SE between patients in remission and patients with active disease.Method: This multicentre, cross-sectional study included consecutive patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with RA according to 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria. LH was measured by the Rheumatology Attitude Index (RAI), Spanish version; SE with the Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale (ASES), Spanish version; functional capacity with the Health Assessment Questionnaire, Argentinian version (HAQ-A); and perceived pain by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Disease activity was measured by the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).Results: A total of 115 patients (82% females) with a mean (± sd) age of 58 ± 13 years were included. We found a significantly positive correlation between LH and perceived pain (p < 0.001), HAQ-A score (p < 0.001), and CDAI (p < 0.001) and a significantly negative correlation between SE and perceived pain (p < 0.001), HAQ-A score (p < 0.001), and CDAI (p < 0.001). We found greater levels of SE and lower grades of LH in patients in remission compared to those with active disease (median 76 vs. 58; p < 0.001 and 6 vs. 11; p < 0.001, respectively).Conclusions: LH and SE correlated significantly with disease activity, functional capacity, and perceived pain. Levels of SE were higher in patients in remission compared to those with active disease as opposed to levels of LH, which were lower in patients in remission compared to those with active disease. These results show that cognitive factors are related to disease activity and their modifications may have importance in the management of RA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Group-level analyses from the phase 3 DISCOVER-2 trial of guselkumab demonstrated robust and durable improvements across psoriatic arthritis (PsA) domains. To specifically evaluate continuous disease control in individual patients, persistence of clinically relevant improvements was assessed, both at consecutive guselkumab dosing visits and over time., Methods: Post hoc analyses included biologic-naïve patients randomized to 100 mg of guselkumab at week 0, week 4, and then every 8 weeks (Q8W). Improvements in joint (minimal clinically important improvement [MCII] in Disease Activity Index for PsA [DAPSA; ≥7.25], clinical DAPSA [cDAPSA; ≥5.7]), skin (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1), and overall disease activity (patient global assessment of arthritis and psoriasis [PtGA Arthritis+Psoriasis; MCII ≥ 15 mm], PsA Disease Activity Score [PASDAS; MCII ≥ 0.8]) were assessed. Proportions of patients with maintenance of DAPSA and cDAPSA MCII at consecutive Q8W guselkumab dosing visits (ie, at weeks 4 and 12, weeks 12 and 20, etc through week 52) and patient-level durability of response through week 100 (Kaplan-Meier) were determined., Results: Among 248 patients randomized to guselkumab Q8W, 93% to 99% maintained clinical improvement in joint disease at consecutive Q8W dosing visits through week 52 across time periods. Among guselkumab patients achieving MCII by week 24, estimated probabilities of maintenance of clinical improvement 100 weeks post achievement ranged from 68% (IGA 0/1) to 89% (PASDAS MCII). Median times to loss of improvement were not reached; estimated mean weeks of maintenance of improvement were 58.6, 52.4, 75.7, 83.6, and 76.7, respectively, for DAPSA, cDAPSA, IGA, PtGA Arthritis+Psoriasis, and PASDAS., Conclusion: Guselkumab provided highly durable patient-level improvements, both at consecutive Q8W dosing visits for joint disease activity and over time across PsA domains according to physician- and patient-driven assessments., (© 2024 The Author(s). ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To establish the diagnostic value of lung ultrasound (LUS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for the detection of interstitial lung disease (ILD)., Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed. Consecutive patients with RA (American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 criteria) who had a chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) performed within 12 months before inclusion, regardless of symptomatology, were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and pharmacological data were recorded. Each patient underwent a LUS with assessment of B-lines (BL) and pleural irregularities (PI). HRCT was considered the gold standard for the confirmatory diagnosis of ILD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to test the ability of LUS findings (BL and PI) in discriminating patients with ILD., Results: A total of 104 RA patients were included, of which 21.8% had ILD. Patients with ILD had more BL (median 26 versus 1, p<0.001) and PI (median 16 versus 5, p<0.001) than patients without ILD. The diagnostic accuracy in ROC curves was: area under the curve (AUC) 0.88 and 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.93 for BL and AUC 0.82 and 95% CI 0.74-0.89 for PI. The best cut-off points for (ILD detection) discriminating the presence of significant interstitial lung abnormalities were 8 BL and 7 PI., Conclusions: The presence of 8 BL and/or 7 PI in the LUS showed an adequate cut-off value for discriminating the presence of significant interstitial lung abnormalities, evocative of ILD.

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) poses significant healthcare challenges in Latin America (LA) due to its high prevalence and unique healthcare dynamics. Despite global advancements, LA faces specific hurdles in effectively managing RA., Areas Covered: This review examines RA epidemiology, treatment strategies, and clinical challenges in LA. RA prevalence varies, with higher rates among indigenous populations. While conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are recommended as first-line therapy, access remains inconsistent. Biologics and targeted synthetic DMARDs are available, but biosimilars have limited accessibility, with drug prices varying significantly. Key barriers include supply interruptions, diagnosis delays, and high non-adherence rates driven by socioeconomic factors. A severe shortage of rheumatologists, particularly in rural areas, affects patient care. Cardiovascular events, comorbidities, and endemic infections further complicate RA management., Expert Opinion: Although RA care in LA has improved through better use of csDMARDs and advanced treatments, major challenges persist, such as a shortage of specialists, limited medical education, and fragmented healthcare systems. Expanding training programs, enhancing telemedicine, and ensuring drug supply continuity are essential. Strengthening clinical research, improving access to affordable treatments, and developing comprehensive, region-specific strategies are crucial to closing the gap between LA and more developed regions in RA care..

The 1st GRAPPA International Meeting on Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis - 1° Encontro Internacional do GRAPPA Sobre Psoríase e Artrite Psoriásica was held on August 18-19, 2023, in São Paulo, Brazil, and marked a turning point in the management of psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in our country. This was an international collaboration, between Brazilian rheumatologists and dermatologists and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA), aiming to promote medical knowledge and particularly the optimal care and management of Brazilian patients with psoriatic disease (PsD).

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

At the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting, members were updated on a number of ongoing activities during the key project update session. These activities included the Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis (AXIS) cohort, the Axial Psoriatic Arthritis Molecular and Clinical Characterization study, the Diagnostic Ultrasound Enthesitis Tool (DUET) study, the Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis of the Effectiveness of Advanced Therapies in Psoriatic Arthritis (SAGE-PsA) study, the Health Initiatives in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis Consortium European States (HIPPOCRATES), the GRAPPA slide library, and the GRAPPA treatment recommendations., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Rheumatology.)

Introduction: There is scarce information on the prevalence of axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) using the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria and even less in Latin America. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of axSpA by applying the ASAS 2009 criteria to a medical records review study of young people with chronic low back pain (LBP) at a university hospital-based health management organization., Methods: Electronic medical records from the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires health management organization were reviewed to estimate the prevalence of axSpA (radiographic axSpA [r-axSpA] and nonradiographic axSpA [nr-axSpA]) using the ASAS 2009 axSpA criteria in all patients with chronic LBP (≥3 months) aged <45 years at the first LBP appointment, observed between 2009 and 2019., Results: Among 795 young people with CLBP, the estimated prevalence of axSpA was 5.78% (r-axSpA, 2.76%; nr-axSpA, 3.02%). Ten of 46 patients (21.74%) with axSpA (all nr-axSpA) were undiagnosed, with an undiagnosed axSpA prevalence of 1.26%. The median interval between the first LBP appointment and diagnosis was 34.6 months for axSpA (58.7 vs. 23.1 months for r-axSpA vs. nr-axSpA). Previously diagnosed r-axSpA and nr-axSpA patients had comparable use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (45% vs. 36%) and delays between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug failure and bDMARD initiation (median, 2.76 vs. 2.66 months)., Conclusion: In our cohort of young persons with chronic LBP, the prevalence of axSpA was approximately 6%, with a high prevalence of undiagnosed axSpA, which could explain the low prevalence of axSpA reported in previous studies in Latin America., Competing Interests: V.M.D. and J. Marcos are full-time employees at Novartis. J. Marin is speaker for Novartis and Janssen. J.R. is on speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, and Pfizer. E.R.S. is on speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB and received Grant/research support from AbbVie and Pfizer Inc. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Routine care studies of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) demonstrated attenuated responses to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in current/past versus never smokers. This post hoc analysis assessed tofacitinib efficacy and safety in patients with PsA or AS by cigarette smoking status at trial screening., Methods: Pooled data from phase 3 and long-term extension (safety only) PsA trials and phase 2 and 3 AS trials were assessed by current/past versus never smoker status. Analysis included efficacy and safety data for tofacitinib 5 (PsA/AS) and 10 (PsA only) mg twice daily (BID) or placebo, and safety data in AS for tofacitinib 2 and 10 mg BID. Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology ≥ 50% responses (ACR50) and minimal disease activity (MDA) responses to month (M)6/M3 (tofacitinib/placebo) in PsA; and ≥ 40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society responses (ASAS40) and AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) < 2.1 responses to week (W)16 in AS. Safety was assessed to M48/W48 (PsA/AS), adjusted for treatment/smoking status/median body mass index (BMI) status/sex/trial/treatment-smoking status interaction., Results: PsA/AS cohorts included 342/178 current/past and 572/194 never smokers. Tofacitinib efficacy was generally greater versus placebo to M3/W6 (PsA/AS), and comparable in current/past and never smokers to M6/W16 (PsA/AS). In patients receiving ≥ 1 tofacitinib dose, adjusted treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)/serious AE (SAE)/discontinuation due to AE incidence rates (IRs) to M48 in PsA were higher in current/past versus never smokers; adjusted IRs to W48 in AS were higher in current/past versus never smokers for TEAEs, but similar for SAEs/discontinuation due to AEs., Conclusions: In both patients with PsA and AS, tofacitinib efficacy was greater versus placebo, and comparable across smoking categories. Adjusted IRs were higher in current/past versus never smokers for TEAEs, SAEs, discontinuation due to AEs in PsA, and for TEAEs in AS, complementing reports of associations between smoking and comorbidities in spondyloarthritis. Findings support increased surveillance/caution for patients with PsA or AS with smoking history., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01877668/NCT01882439/NCT03486457/NCT01976364/NCT01786668/NCT03502616., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of Interest Alexis Ogdie is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CorEvitas, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, and has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis, and Pfizer Inc. Lars E. Kristensen is a consultant for AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Galapagos NV, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi, and UCB, and has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer Inc, and UCB. Enrique R. Soriano is an advisor for Janssen, a consultant for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, and has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, and UCB. Servet Akar is an advisor for AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi, TRPharm, and UCB. Yanhui Sun was an employee and shareholder of Pfizer Inc at the time of the study, and is currently an employee of Rundo Med-Tech, Shanghai, China. David Gruben and Lara Fallon are employees and shareholders of Pfizer Inc. Cassandra D. Kinch was an employee and shareholder of Pfizer Inc at the time of the study. Dafna D. Gladman is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB, and has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB. Ethical Approval All studies were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines of the International Council for Harmonisation and were approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board and/or Independent Ethics Committee at each investigational site [7–12]. Patients provided written, informed consent., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Patterns of treatment response can inform clinical decision-making. This study assessed the course and impact of achieving minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) in clinical measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: Post hoc analyses evaluated 1120 patients with PsA receiving guselkumab every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) or placebo from DISCOVER-1 (31% tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-experienced) and DISCOVER-2 (biologic-naïve). Achievement of MCII in clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA), patient global assessment (PtGA) of arthritis, PtGA of psoriasis, patient-reported pain, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary score, PtGA Arthritis + Psoriasis, and PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) was compared between the guselkumab and placebo groups using Cox regression. Logistic regression adjusting for baseline factors evaluated associations between early (W4/W8) MCII achievement and stringent response (≥%50/%70 improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria, cDAPSA low disease activity [LDA], PASDAS LDA, and minimal disease activity) at W24/W52 among guselkumab-randomized patients., Results: Among patients with highly active PsA (baseline cDAPSA = 44.1-45.0, PASDAS = 6.4-6.5), times to MCII were significantly faster for guselkumab vs. placebo (hazard ratios 1.3-2.5; P < 0.05). Across measures, at first timepoint assessed, MCII rates were significantly higher with guselkumab (Q4W/Q8W 28-68%/29-65%) vs. placebo (19-47%; both P < 0.05). Early (W4/W8) MCII with guselkumab associated with higher odds of achieving stringent responses at W24/W52 (odds ratios 1.4-17.2/1.4-5.4)., Conclusions: In a mixed PsA population, significant proportions of patients treated with guselkumab achieved early (W4/W8) MCII across clinical and PRO measures, which associated with a higher likelihood of attaining clinically relevant improvements and low levels of disease activity at W24/W52., Trial Registration: DISCOVER-1 (NCT03162796). DISCOVER-2 (NCT03158285)., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest Jeffrey R Curtis: received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CorEvitas, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Myriad, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, and NIAMS P30AR072583; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CorEvitas, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Myriad, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB. Atul Deodhar: received consulting fees for participation in advisory boards from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; research grant funding from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; speaker fees from Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Enrique R Soriano: speakers bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB; consulting fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche; grant/research support from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. Emmanouil Rampakakis: consulting fees from Janssen; employee of JSS Medical Research. May Shawi: shareholder of Johnson & Johnson; employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Natalie J Shiff: shareholder of AbbVie, Gilead, Iovance, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax, and Viatris; employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, at the time this work was performed (current employee of Alpine Immune Sciences, a Vertex company). Chenglong Han: shareholder of Johnson & Johnson; employee of Janssen Global Services, LLC. William Tillett: received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Ono-Pharma, Pfizer, and UCB; grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, and UCB; speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Dafna D Gladman: grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Ethical Approval The DISCOVER-1 (NCT03162796) and DISCOVER-2 (NCT03158285) studies were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and International Council for Harmonization Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. Each participating site's governing ethical body approved study protocols, and all patients provided written informed consent., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: This study contributes to the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)'s effort to define 'difficult-to-treat' PsA (D2T-PsA), leveraging insights of healthcare professionals who are GRAPPA members. The primary objective is to inform GRAPPA's D2T PsA project, ensuring the consensus definition reflects clinical experience and expertise., Methods: An online survey was conducted among GRAPPA's healthcare professionals managing PsA patients. The survey covered demographic details, structured questions, and open-ended queries to gather comprehensive insights into the experts' viewpoints., Results: About 223 physicians completed the survey, comprising 179 (80.2%) rheumatologists and 40 (17.9%) dermatologists. The majority, 184 (82.5%), favoured establishing distinct definitions for D2T-PsA and complex-to-manage PsA (C2M-PsA). Furthermore, 202 (90.5%) supported a definition that includes objective inflammation signs (clinical, laboratory, imaging, among others). However, opinions varied on the criteria for prior treatment failures, with most (93, 41.7%) favouring a definition that includes at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug and two or more biological- or targeted-synthetic-DMARDs with different mechanisms of action., Conclusion: The survey reveals a majority opinion among GRAPPA experts favouring the differentiation between D2T-PsA and C2M-PsA, and the inclusion of objective inflammatory markers in these definitions. However, there is less than 50% agreement on the specific treatment failure criteria, particularly regarding the number of therapies needed to classify PsA as D2T. These findings suggest a need for continued discussion to reach a more unified approach in defining D2T-PsA, reflecting the complexity of the condition., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objective: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is chronic disease that compromises multiple domains and might be associated with progressive joint damage, increased mortality, functional limitation, and considerably impaired quality of life. Our objective was to generate evidence-based recommendations on the management of PsA in Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) countries., Methods: We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-ADOLOPMENT approach to adapt the 2019 recommendations of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. A working group consisting of rheumatologists from various countries in Latin America identified relevant topics for the treatment of PsA in the region. The methodology team updated the evidence and synthesized the information used to generate the final recommendations. These were then discussed and defined by a panel of 31 rheumatologists from 15 countries., Results: Theses guidelines report 15 recommendations addressing therapeutic targets, use of antiinflammatory agents and corticosteroids, treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (conventional synthetic, biologic, and targeted synthetic), therapeutic failure, optimization of biologic therapy, nonpharmacological interventions, assessment tools, and follow-up of patients with PsA., Conclusion: Here we present a set of recommendations to guide decision making in the treatment of PsA in Latin America, based on the best evidence available, considering resources, medical expertise, and the patient's values and preferences. The successful implementation of these recommendations should be based on clinical practice conditions, healthcare settings in each country, and a tailored evaluation of patients., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Objective: In the absence of axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA)-specific tools, the BASDAI and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) are used to assess axial symptoms in patients with PsA. Here, we assessed the performance of BASDAI and ASDAS in patients with PsA., Methods: Patients with active PsA in DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03162796 and NCT03158285, respectively) with or without axPsA but with available baseline BASDAI information were analysed; those with investigator-identified axial symptoms and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis comprised the axPsA cohort. Correlations between BASDAI/ASDAS and clinical variables were assessed with Pearson's coefficient ( r ). Longitudinal effects of enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index [LEI]), swollen joint count and presence versus absence of axPsA on BASDAI/ASDAS (normalized 0-10 scale) were analysed with mixed models for repeated measures., Results: At baseline in the axPsA ( n  = 312) and non-axPsA ( n  = 124) cohorts, BASDAI scores showed no or weak correlation with swollen joint count (0.18-0.20), tender joint count (0.12-0.29), LEI (-0.04 to 0.24) and physician global assessment (0.35-0.43); moderate correlation with fatigue (both -0.56); and strong correlation with patient global assessment of disease activity (0.62-0.69) and patient-reported pain (0.66-0.70). Similar correlations were observed for ASDAS. Axial involvement versus non-involvement was associated with higher BASDAI scores and ASDAS (all β ≥ 0.5), without differences between instruments; longitudinal associations between swollen joint count (β ≤ 0.06)/LEI (β ≤ 0.19) and BASDAI/ASDAS were clinically unimportant., Conclusion: BASDAI and ASDAS performed similarly in patients with active PsA and axial involvement, independent of peripheral disease involvement, supporting their performance in assessing axial disease activity., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03162796 and NCT03158285., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

In recent years, a number of studies have examined risk factors for development of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) among patients with PsO. Most recently, 5 studies have examined the effect of biologic therapy on the development of PsA. However, the results have been mixed, with 3 studies suggesting a lower risk for PsA among those using a biologic therapy and 2 suggesting a higher risk for PsA. At the 2022 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) meeting, Drs. Enrique Soriano and Alexis Ogdie conducted a debate to discuss the arguments for and against the use of biologic therapies in PsO for the purpose of preventing PsA., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

At the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2022 annual meeting, the recently published new GRAPPA recommendations were presented and their unique characteristics highlighted, including their truly international approach, the inclusion of patient views from the very beginning, the representation by both rheumatologists and dermatologists, consideration of the diverse domains of psoriatic arthritis, and the inclusion of comorbidities to inform possible adverse events and their potential influence on treatment choices., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) pilot grant awards help support young researchers starting their careers while also encouraging them to develop a focus on psoriatic disease. In this brief report, winners of the 2020 and 2021 awards present the results of their pilot projects., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Actions towards the health-related Sustainable Development Goal 3.4 typically focus on non-communicable diseases (NCDs) associated with premature mortality, with less emphasis on NCDs associated with disability, such as musculoskeletal conditions-the leading contributor to the global burden of disability. Can systems strengthening priorities for an underprioritised NCD be codesigned, disseminated and evaluated? A 'roadmap' for strengthening global health systems for improved musculoskeletal health was launched in 2021. In this practice paper, we outline dissemination efforts for this Roadmap and insights on evaluating its reach, user experience and early adoption. A global network of 22 dissemination partners was established to drive dissemination efforts, focussing on Africa, Asia and Latin America, each supported with a suite of dissemination assets. Within a 6-month evaluation window, 52 Twitter posts were distributed, 2195 visitors from 109 countries accessed the online multilingual Roadmap and 138 downloads of the Roadmap per month were recorded. Among 254 end users who answered a user-experience survey, respondents 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' the Roadmap was valuable (88.3%), credible (91.2%), useful (90.1%) and usable (85.4%). Most (77.8%) agreed or strongly agreed they would adopt the Roadmap in some way. Collection of real-world adoption case studies allowed unique insights into adoption practices in different contexts, settings and health system levels. Diversity in adoption examples suggests that the Roadmap has value and adoption potential at multiple touchpoints within health systems globally. With resourcing, harnessing an engaged global community and establishing a global network of partners, a systems strengthening tool can be cocreated, disseminated and formatively evaluated., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AMB reports grant income from AO Alliance, Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology, Australian Rheumatology Association, Curtin University, Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology, and World Federation of Chiropractic related to the current work. AMB reports grant funding from the Australian Government, Department of Health; Medical Research Future Fund (Australian National Health and Medical Research Council); Western Australian Government Department of Health; Bone and Joint Decade Foundation; Curtin University; Institute for Bone and Joint Research (Australia); Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College; and Arthritis and Osteoporosis Western Australia outside the submitted work. AMB reports consultancy fees and travel support from the WHO and speaker fees from the American College of Rheumatology outside the current work. JC: reports personal income from Curtin University related to the current work. MC: reports institutional income from the Bone and Joint Decade Foundation related to the current work; and Royalties from Up-to-Date unrelated the current work. NMA: nothing to disclose. LF: reports leadership roles with World Physiotherapy and the International Federation of orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists. SAH: nothing to disclose. MJ: reports a leadership role with AO Alliance and personal fees. AAK: nothing to disclose. LM: reports institutional income from the Bone and Joint Decade Foundation related to the current work. LM reports grant income from Janssen Australia, NHMRC Australian Government CREE for Inflammatory Arthritis, MRFF Australian Government Adult Arthritis Biologic Tapering Trial, and MRFF Australian Government Juvenile Arthritis Biologic Tapering Trial outside the current work. LM reports data safety monitoring (unpaid) on an Australian Government funded trial for opioid medicines. LM reports leadership positions with the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health and the Australian Rheumatology Association. FM: reports a leadership position with the International Federation of Musculoskeletal Research Societies. FR: nothing to disclose. SSarfraz: nothing to disclose. SSharma: reports fellowship funding from the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) and speaker fees and travel support from the IASP unrelated to the current work. SSharma reports leadership positions with the IASP. ERS: reports income from PANLAR, Abbvie, Elea and Pfizer outside the current work; testimony fees from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Glaxo, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB; and support for attening meetings from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen. HS: reports grant income from AO Alliance, Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology, Australian Rheumatology Association, Curtin University, Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology, and World Federation of Chiropractic related to the current work. HS reports grant funding from the Australian Government, Department of Health; Medical Research Future Fund (Australian National Health and Medical Research Council); Western Australian Government Department of Health; Bone and Joint Decade Foundation; Curtin University; Institute for Bone and Joint Research (Australia); and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College outside the submitted work. HS reports travel support from the Australian Pain Society to attend a scientific meeting., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) leadership congregated for a strategic planning meeting before the 2022 GRAPPA annual meeting in New York, USA. Meeting aims were to review GRAPPA's performance in relation to its 2016 goals and identify successes and areas for further improvement, identify key GRAPPA priorities and activities for the next 5 years, and explore committee structures to best support these aims., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) comprises a spectrum of chronic inflammatory manifestations affecting the axial skeleton and represents a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. Our objective was to generate a set of evidence-based recommendations for the management of axSpA for physicians, health professionals, rheumatologists and policy decision makers in Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) countries. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation-ADOLOPMENT methodology was used to adapt existing recommendations after performing an independent systematic search and synthesis of the literature to update the evidence. A working group consisting of rheumatologists, epidemiologists and patient representatives from countries within the Americas prioritized 13 topics relevant to the context of these countries for the management of axSpA. This Evidence-Based Guideline article reports 13 recommendations addressing therapeutic targets, the use of NSAIDs and glucocorticoids, treatment with DMARDs (including conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs), therapeutic failure, optimization of the use of biologic DMARDs, the use of drugs for extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA, non-pharmacological interventions and the follow-up of patients with axSpA., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Objectives: To investigate factors associated with severe COVID-19 in people with psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)., Methods: Demographic data, clinical characteristics and COVID-19 outcome severity of adults with PsO, PsA and axSpA were obtained from two international physician-reported registries. A three-point ordinal COVID-19 severity scale was defined: no hospitalisation, hospitalisation (and no death) and death. ORs were estimated using multivariable ordinal logistic regression., Results: Of 5045 cases, 18.3% had PsO, 45.5% PsA and 36.3% axSpA. Most (83.6%) were not hospitalised, 14.6% were hospitalised and 1.8% died. Older age was non-linearly associated with COVID-19 severity. Male sex (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.83), cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, metabolic and cancer comorbidities (ORs 1.25-2.89), moderate/high disease activity and/or glucocorticoid use (ORs 1.39-2.23, vs remission/low disease activity and no glucocorticoids) were associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19. Later pandemic time periods (ORs 0.42-0.52, vs until 15 June 2020), PsO (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.65, vs PsA) and baseline exposure to TNFi, IL17i and IL-23i/IL-12+23i (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.73; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.98; respectively; vs no disease-modifying antirheumatic drug) were associated with reduced odds of severe COVID-19., Conclusion: Older age, male sex, comorbidity burden, higher disease activity and glucocorticoid intake were associated with more severe COVID-19. Later pandemic time periods, PsO and exposure to TNFi, IL17i and IL-23i/IL-12+23i were associated with less severe COVID-19. These findings will enable risk stratification and inform management decisions for patients with PsO, PsA and axSpA during COVID-19 waves or similar future respiratory pandemics., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PMM has received honoraria from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript, and is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University College London Hospitals (UCLH), Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). MS reports a joint, unconditional grant from a consortium of 14 companies supporting the German RABBIT register (AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Hexal, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, Viatris and UCB). SKM reports departmental income from AbbVie, Almirall, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, outside the submitted work. JL has nothing to disclose. LG reports personal consultant fees/honoraria/travelling support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Biogen, Celgene, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, and grants from Sandoz and UC, all unrelated to this manuscript. ND has nothing to disclose. AP has nothing to disclose. AS reports a joint, unconditional grant from a consortium of 14 companies supporting the German RABBIT register (AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Hexal, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, Viatris and UCB) and personal fees from lectures for AbbVie, Amgen, Celltrion, MSD, Janssen, Lilly, Roche, BMS and Pfizer, all unrelated to this work. ACR reports a joint, unconditional grant from a consortium of 12 companies supporting the German RABBIT-SpA register (AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, Hexal, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Viatris and UCB) and personal fees from lectures for Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer, all unrelated to this work. BF has nothing to disclose. CGA has nothing to disclose. CGSS has nothing to disclose. CEMG reports grants and/or personal fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Anaptysbio, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Evelo Bioscience, Inmagene, GSK, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, LEO, Lilly, Novartis, ONO Pharmaceutical, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, outside the submitted work. CL has nothing to disclose. CM-R has nothing to disclose. DW has received personal speaker/consultant fees from AbbVie, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche Chugai, Amgen, Nordic Pharma, UCB, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Sandoz, Grunenthal, Galapagos. DAR is Scientific Advisor for GSK, unrelated to this work. DW has nothing to disclose. EFM has received personal consultant fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Portugal, Lda; LPCDR received support for specific activities: grants from Abbvie, Novartis, Lilly Portugal, Amgen Biofarmacêutica, Grünenthal S.A., MSD, Medac and from A. Menarini Portugal-Farmacêutica, S.A.; grants and non-financial support from Pfizer, and non-financial support from Grünenthal GmbH, outside the submitted work. ES has nothing to disclose. ESR reports grants/contracts from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen and Elea, honoraria from Amgen, Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB, support for attending meetings from Abbvie, Pfizer, UCB, and Janssen, and participation on data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen, Sandoz and Novartis. FMR has nothing to disclose. FO has nothing to disclose. FRM has nothing to disclose. HS has nothing to disclose. JD has nothing to disclose. JNB reports grants and/or personal fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, J&J, LEO Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung, Sun Pharma, and UCB, outside of the submitted work. JH has nothing to disclose. KLH has received non-personal speaker’s fees from Abbvie and grant income from BMS, UCB, and Pfizer, all unrelated to this manuscript, and is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. LG has received consulting fees and/or research support from Abbvie, Acelyrin, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript, and research support from UCB. LS has nothing to disclose. LJ has nothing to disclose. LC has not received fees or personal grants from any laboratory, but her institute works by contract for laboratories among other institutions, such as Abbvie Spain, Eisai, Gebro Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, S.A., Novartis Farmaceutica, Pfizer, Roche Farma, Sanofi Aventis, Astellas Pharma, Actelion Pharmaceuticals España, Grünenthal GmbH and UCB Pharma. MMP has nothing to disclose. MDZ has nothing to disclose. MdlAS has nothing to disclose. MY has nothing to disclose. MD has nothing to disclose. NG-S has nothing to disclose. NR has nothing to disclose. NH has received consulting fees from Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and UCB. PS has nothing to disclose. RG has received consulting/speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Cornerstones, all unrelated to this manuscript, and travel grants from Pfizer and Janssen. RH reports consulting fees from AbbVie, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, Mylan, Gilead, Janssen, TAKEDA/Shire, Roche/Chugai, research grant from Pfizer, all unrelated to this manuscript. SL-T has nothing to disclose. SB reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Horizon, Novartis, and Pfizer, and is an employee of Pfizer, Inc. TP reports personal consultant fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Fresenius-Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript. TO reports consultancy fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, unrelated to the present work. WBM has received personal speaker/consultant fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Amgen, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Biopas. ZSW has nothing to disclose. ZZNY has nothing to disclose. JY is supported by NIH/NIAMS K24 AR07534 and AHRQ R01HS028024. She has received research grants from Gilead, Aurinia, BMS Foundation and Astra Zeneca and performed consultation for Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, and Aurinia. PCR has nothing to disclose. CHS reports grants from AbbVie, Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer and through consortia with multiple academic partners (psort.org.uk, BIOMAP-IMI.eu), outside the submitted work; she is a member of the British Association of Dermatologists Guideline committee on biologics in psoriasis., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Abstract: Telemedicine is the delivery of health care services by health care professionals using information and communication technologies to exchange valid information for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases. Telemedicine was further developed in Latin America during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, becoming the first line of defense for health professionals to stop the spread of infections and allow them to continue the care of their patients. During the pandemic, 79% of rheumatologists in Latin America reported the use of remote communication, the most frequent being the use of phone calls and WhatsApp voice messages. In contrast, 84% of the patients reported that telemedicine was appropriate for them during the pandemic, but only 54% considered telemedicine to be a valid option for rheumatic health care after the pandemic. Telemedicine and telehealth have advantages such as lower costs, improved access in rural areas, shortage of care providers, and reduction in waiting time for appointments. However, it also has some challenges, such as legal, technological, and organizational barriers. In this review, we explore the current state of telemedicine in Latin America and discuss its future., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors associated with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) in a cohort of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis and renal involvement., Methods: Observational retrospective study. We included patients with biopsy-proven ANCA glomerulonephritis (GN) diagnosed between 2001 and 2016, with at least 1-year follow-up. Data were recorded at diagnosis, end of induction, after 12 months of treatment, and at the end of follow-up. We analysed clinical-analytical data and renal histopathology, as well as treatments, dialysis requirement, relapses and death. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with long-term ACKD (eGFR < 30 ml/min). Multivariate analysis using an alternative outcome (eGFR at the end of follow-up) was performed. Diagnostic accuracy for ACKD of each predictor variable was compared using AUC of ROC curves., Results: Sixty patients were included: 17 GPA, 14 MPA, 5 EGPA, and 24 RLV. Forty-six patients were women (76.7%). Mean age at diagnosis was 67.8 years (SD 13.1), and median follow-up time was 4.2 years (IQR 2.2-6.8). At the end of follow-up, 12 patients (20.0%) had an eGFR < 30 ml/min. Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant association of ACKD with sclerotic class biopsy (OR 7.17, 95% CI 1.34-38.31), 12-month proteinuria (OR 5.16, 95% CI 1.16-22.87), and creatinine at diagnosis (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.52), end of induction (OR 15.40, 95% CI 2.41-98.28), and after 12 months (OR 19.25, 95% CI 2.75-134.92). In the multivariate analysis, eGFR at baseline (< 0.001), after 6 months (< 0.001) and 12 months of treatment (< 0.001), remained statistically associated with eGFR at the end of follow-up. The best diagnostic accuracy in ROC curves was shown by serum creatinine at the end of induction treatment (AUC 0.93) and after 12 months (AUC 0.94)., Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with ANCA GN, creatinine and eGFR at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment were the best predictors of ACKD at the end of follow-up., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background/objective: This study describes the impact of immunomodulatory and/or immunosuppressive (IM/IS) drugs in the outcomes of COVID-19 infection in a cohort of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs)., Methods: Adult patients with IMIDs with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Data were reported by the treating physician between August 13, 2020 and July 31, 2021. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and DMARDs, as well as clinical characteristics, complications, and treatment of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, were recorded. Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression models were carried out., Results: A total of 1672 patients with IMIDs were included, of whom 1402 were treated with IM/IS drugs. The most frequent diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (47.7%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (18.4%). COVID-19 symptoms were present in 95.2% of the patients. A total of 461 (27.6%) patients were hospitalized, 8.2% were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 4.4% died due to COVID-19.Patients without IM/IS treatment used glucocorticoids less frequently but at higher doses, had higher levels of disease activity, were significantly older, were more frequently hospitalized, admitted to the intensive care unit, and died due to COVID-19. After adjusting for these factors, treatment with IM/IS drugs was not associated with a worse COVID-19 outcome (World Health Organization-Ordinal Scale ≥5) (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.06)., Conclusions: SAR-COVID is the first multicenter Argentine registry collecting data from patients with rheumatic diseases and SARS-CoV-2 infection. After adjusting for relevant covariates, treatment with IM/IS drugs was not associated with severe COVID-19 in patients with IMIDs., Study Registration: This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT04568421., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: SAR-COVID is a multisponsor registry, where Pfizer, Abbvie, and Elea Phoenix had provided unrestricted grants. None of them has participated or influenced the development of the project, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, or the drafting of this report. They do not have access to the information collected in the database., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of the interleukin-23p19-subunit inhibitor, guselkumab, in DISCOVER-1 patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) by prior use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)., Methods: The phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled DISCOVER-1 study enrolled patients with active PsA (swollen joint count ≥3, tender joint count ≥3, and C-reactive protein level ≥ 0.3 mg/dl) despite standard therapies; approximately one-third could have received two or fewer prior TNFi. Patients were randomized to 100 mg of guselkumab every 4 weeks (Q4W); 100 mg of guselkumab at week 0, at week 4, and every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo with crossover to guselkumab Q4W at week 24. Efficacy end points of ≥20% and ≥50% improvement in individual American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and achieving the minimal disease activity (MDA) components were summarized by prior TNFi status., Results: In DISCOVER-1, 118 (31%) patients previously received one or two TNFi. As previously reported, rates for acheiving ≥20% improvement in the composite ACR response at week 24 and week 52 were similar in TNFi-naive and TNFi-experienced patients randomized to guselkumab Q4W (76% and 68%, respectively) and Q8W (61% and 58%, respectively). Similar trends were observed for response rates of ≥20% and ≥50% improvement in individual ACR criteria and for achieving individual MDA components at week 24; TNFi-naive patients were more likely to achieve end points related to physical function and pain than TNFi-experienced patients. Overall, response rates were maintained or increased through week 52 regardless of prior TNFi use. Through week 60 in guselkumab-treated TNFi-naive and TNFi-experienced patients, 62% and 64%, respectively, reported one or more adverse events (AEs); 4% and 6% had serious AEs, respectively., Conclusion: Through 1 year, 100 mg of guselkumab Q4W and Q8W provided sustained improvements across multiple domains in both TNFi-naive and TNFi-experienced patients with active PsA., (© 2023 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: Several advanced therapies have been licensed across the related conditions of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Crohn disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and noninfectious uveitis. We sought to summarize results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of advanced therapies for these related conditions in patients with PsA., Methods: We updated the previous systematic search conducted in 2013 with literature reviews of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (from February 2013 to August 2020) on this subject; only those new studies are presented here. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework., Results: The number of RCTs meeting eligibility criteria were 12 for CD, 15 for UC, and 5 for uveitis. The tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) class appears to be efficacious and safe across CD, UC, and uveitis, with the exception of etanercept. Interleukin 12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i) are efficacious for CD and UC. Phase II and III RCTs of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and IL-23i in CD and UC are promising in terms of efficacy and safety. IL-17i must be used with great caution in patients with PsA at high risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). RCTs in uveitis have mainly studied adalimumab., Conclusion: We have identified 32 recent RCTs in IBD and uveitis and updated recommendations for managing patients with PsA and these related conditions. A multispecialty approach is essential to effectively, safely, and holistically manage such patients. Advanced therapies are not equally efficacious across these related conditions, with dosing regimens and safety varying., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Musculoskeletal (MSK) health impairments contribute substantially to the pain and disability burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet health systems strengthening (HSS) responses are nascent in these settings. We aimed to explore the contemporary context, framed as challenges and opportunities, for improving population-level prevention and management of MSK health in LMICs using secondary qualitative data from a previous study exploring HSS priorities for MSK health globally and (2) to contextualize these findings through a primary analysis of health policies for integrated management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in select LMICs. Part 1: 12 transcripts of interviews with LMIC-based key informants (KIs) were inductively analysed. Part 2: systematic content analysis of health policies for integrated care of NCDs where KIs were resident (Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malaysia, Philippines and South Africa). A thematic framework of LMIC-relevant challenges and opportunities was empirically derived and organized around five meta-themes: (1) MSK health is a low priority; (2) social determinants adversely affect MSK health; (3) healthcare system issues de-prioritize MSK health; (4) economic constraints restrict system capacity to direct and mobilize resources to MSK health; and (5) build research capacity. Twelve policy documents were included, describing explicit foci on cardiovascular disease (100%), diabetes (100%), respiratory conditions (100%) and cancer (89%); none explicitly focused on MSK health. Policy strategies were coded into three categories: (1) general principles for people-centred NCD care, (2) service delivery and (3) system strengthening. Four policies described strategies to address MSK health in some way, mostly related to injury care. Priorities and opportunities for HSS for MSK health identified by KIs aligned with broader strategies targeting NCDs identified in the policies. MSK health is not currently prioritized in NCD health policies among selected LMICs. However, opportunities to address the MSK-attributed disability burden exist through integrating MSK-specific HSS initiatives with initiatives targeting NCDs generally and injury and trauma care., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)

Objective: To compare achievement of Disease Activity Index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (REM)/low disease activity (LDA) with very low disease activity (VLDA)/minimal disease activity (MDA) targets in tofacitinib-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: In this post hoc analysis, data were pooled from two phase 3 studies (6 months' [NCT01882439] and 12 months' [NCT01877668] duration) of patients with PsA receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily. Cut-offs for DAPSA targets: ≤4 for clinical REM and >4-≤14 for LDA. VLDA and MDA were defined as meeting 7 or ≥5, respectively, of 7 criteria. An ordered logistic regression model was performed to evaluate associations between baseline characteristics and achievement of DAPSA targets as well as VLDA/MDA at month 3. Agreement between achieving DAPSA and VLDA/MDA targets at months 1-6 was assessed via kappa tests. Change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores (month 6), modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and proportion of radiographic non-progressors (mTSS ≤0.5) at month 12 (NCT01877668 only) were compared across DAPSA and VLDA/MDA targets., Results: Increased disease activity at baseline was associated with reduced likelihood of achieving DAPSA-REM/DAPSA-LDA or VLDA/MDA at month 3. There was moderate agreement (kappa values 0.41-0.60) between DAPSA-REM and VLDA, and DAPSA-LDA and MDA, from months 1 to 6, although over half of patients achieving DAPSA-REM and over two thirds of patients achieving DAPSA-LDA, respectively, were not captured by VLDA and MDA. Achieving DAPSA-REM/DAPSA-LDA or VLDA/MDA was associated with improved HAQ-DI and SF-36 PCS scores at month 6, and slightly reduced radiographic progression at month 12., Conclusion: This analysis of data from tofacitinib-treated patients with PsA demonstrated moderate agreement between the DAPSA and VLDA/MDA composite instruments. In agreement with previous studies, VLDA and MDA may be more difficult to achieve than DAPSA-REM and DAPSA-LDA, respectively. However, the clinical and prognostic relevance of this finding should be determined. These data support DAPSA and VLDA/MDA as useful tools for evaluating disease activity and treatment response in PsA., Clinicaltrials: GOV: NCT01882439; NCT01877668., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest EES has received grants/contracts from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer Inc (to institution); has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Janssen; and has received other remuneration from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer Inc. GC has received grants/contracts from Pfizer Inc (to institution); has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer Inc and Sandoz; and has received other remuneration from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen and Pfizer Inc. PN has received consulting fees and other remuneration from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead/Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc and UCB. JSS has received grants/contracts from AbbVie, Astro, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Pfizer Inc and Roche (to institution); and has received consulting fees and other remuneration from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Astro, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO Pharma, Janssen, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, R-Pharm, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi and UCB. PJM has received grants/contracts from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sun and UCB; has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sun and UCB; and has received other remuneration from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, and UCB. ERS has received grants or contracts from AbbVie and Janssen; and has received consulting fees and other remuneration from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sandoz and UCB. CH, RM and DPdeL are employees and stockholders of Pfizer Inc. AES was an employee of Syneos Health, who were paid contractors to Pfizer Inc in the development of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background/objective: This study aims to describe the course and to identify poor prognostic factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases., Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years of age, with a rheumatic disease, who had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were consecutively included by major rheumatology centers from Argentina, in the national, observational SAR-COVID registry between August 13, 2020 and July 31, 2021. Hospitalization, oxygen requirement, and death were considered poor COVID-19 outcomes., Results: A total of 1915 patients were included. The most frequent rheumatic diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (42%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (16%). Comorbidities were reported in half of them (48%). Symptoms were reported by 95% of the patients, 28% were hospitalized, 8% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and 4% died due to COVID-19. During hospitalization, 9% required non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) or high flow oxygen devices and 17% invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). In multivariate analysis models, using poor COVID-19 outcomes as dependent variables, older age, male gender, higher disease activity, treatment with glucocorticoids or rituximab, and the presence of at least one comorbidity and a greater number of them were associated with worse prognosis. In addition, patients with public health insurance and Mestizos were more likely to require hospitalization., Conclusions: In addition to the known poor prognostic factors, in this cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases, high disease activity, and treatment with glucocorticoids and rituximab were associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. Furthermore, patients with public health insurance and Mestizos were 44% and 39% more likely to be hospitalized, respectively., Study Registration: This study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT04568421. Key Points • High disease activity, and treatment with glucocorticoids and rituximab were associated with poor COVID-19 outcome in patients with rheumatic diseases. • Some socioeconomic factors related to social inequality, including non-Caucasian ethnicity and public health insurance, were associated with hospitalization due to COVID-19., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)