Search

A 98-year-old woman presented with histologically confirmed locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the face. A multidisciplinary approach excluded surgery because of the site near sensitive organs, extension, age, and comorbidities. Patient and caregivers declined radiotherapy considering the necessity of multiple hospital appointments. The patient was then placed on therapy with sonidegib, an oral inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. There was a very rapid clinical response after only 28 days of treatment. The basal cell carcinoma improved progressively, with no adverse events reported. This case illustrates the efficacy and safety of this treatment in an advanced age patient. This treatment had a remarkably positive impact on quality of life, including that of the caregivers.

Background: Basal cell carcinoma is the most prevalent skin cancer, most characterized by local aggressiveness but with low metastatic potential, and bone metastasis is quite heterogeneous, thus the incidence profile is variable size from 0.0028% to 0.5%. We have this patient with an unusual example of basal cell carcinoma with bone metastases to add to the scarce report on this matter. Case description: Here we document a 48-year-old Persian man with a background of being exposed to the sun for a long time. He was diagnosed with an ulcer on the cheek, which was clinically characterized and further confirmed by biopsy as morpheaform basal cell carcinoma. Following the first round of excision, multiple relapses eventually metastasized to the bone. The latter was found on follow-up radiologic scans. This case is characterized by the aggressive nature of the disease and the heterogeneity of basal cell carcinoma growth, thus challenging the conventional view of basal cell carcinoma behavior. Treatment included surgical excision of the primary lesion, which was treated with radiotherapy afterward. However, the skeleton improved slowly during follow-up, and palliative care was eventually pursued to control symptoms and improve quality of life. Conclusions: This was a rare case of basal cell carcinoma metastasis to non-bone organs, which reminded us to consider basal cell carcinoma metastasis, especially in the case of atypical basal cell carcinoma. Therefore, risk-aware patient management is essential. Moreover, these findings highlight the role of further research into the mechanisms of basal cell carcinoma metastasis, leading to improved therapeutic strategies that may lead to potential improvements in patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 62-year-old man presented with a slowly growing, painless lesion on his face. This eventually led to a progressive left-eye vision lesion, and the patient was subsequently diagnosed with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Of note, BCC involving cranial nerves is extremely rare, making this case unique and important to highlight. Standard treatment options for BCC involve surgery, radiation, or platinum-based chemotherapy. However, targeted therapies such as sonidegib and vismodegib - sonic hedgehog pathway inhibitors - have emerged that have been approved for treating BCC, as have anti-PD1 immunotherapies, such as cemiplimab, with their success likely based on the high tumor mutational burden seen in some of these tumors. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors also serve a role in treating this condition as well. Molecular studies on metastatic/advanced BCC and other rare malignancies may inform treatment therapeutic decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Basal cell carcinoma is the most prevalent skin cancer, most characterized by local aggressiveness but with low metastatic potential, and bone metastasis is quite heterogeneous, thus the incidence profile is variable size from 0.0028% to 0.5%. We have this patient with an unusual example of basal cell carcinoma with bone metastases to add to the scarce report on this matter. Case description Here we document a 48-year-old Persian man with a background of being exposed to the sun for a long time. He was diagnosed with an ulcer on the cheek, which was clinically characterized and further confirmed by biopsy as morpheaform basal cell carcinoma. Following the first round of excision, multiple relapses eventually metastasized to the bone. The latter was found on follow-up radiologic scans. This case is characterized by the aggressive nature of the disease and the heterogeneity of basal cell carcinoma growth, thus challenging the conventional view of basal cell carcinoma behavior. Treatment included surgical excision of the primary lesion, which was treated with radiotherapy afterward. However, the skeleton improved slowly during follow-up, and palliative care was eventually pursued to control symptoms and improve quality of life. Conclusions This was a rare case of basal cell carcinoma metastasis to non-bone organs, which reminded us to consider basal cell carcinoma metastasis, especially in the case of atypical basal cell carcinoma. Therefore, risk-aware patient management is essential. Moreover, these findings highlight the role of further research into the mechanisms of basal cell carcinoma metastasis, leading to improved therapeutic strategies that may lead to potential improvements in patient outcomes.

A 62-year-old man presented with a slowly growing, painless lesion on his face. This eventually led to a progressive left-eye vision lesion, and the patient was subsequently diagnosed with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Of note, BCC involving cranial nerves is extremely rare, making this case unique and important to highlight. Standard treatment options for BCC involve surgery, radiation, or platinum-based chemotherapy. However, targeted therapies such as sonidegib and vismodegib – sonic hedgehog pathway inhibitors – have emerged that have been approved for treating BCC, as have anti-PD1 immunotherapies, such as cemiplimab, with their success likely based on the high tumor mutational burden seen in some of these tumors. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors also serve a role in treating this condition as well. Molecular studies on metastatic/advanced BCC and other rare malignancies may inform treatment therapeutic decisions.

To review the efficacy and safety of oral vismodegib (Erivedge; Genentech) in the management of locally advanced orbital and periorbital basal cell carcinoma (BCC). A literature search was conducted last in September 2023 in the PubMed database for English language original research that evaluated the effect of oral vismodegib on orbital and periorbital BCC. Sixty articles were identified and 16 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies demonstrated high response rates, with up to 100% of patients responding to the medication in individual studies and initial complete regression occurring in up to 88% of patients. Vismodegib treatment resulted in significant reductions in tumor volume, resulting in globe preservation for most patients. However, in 12% of patients, the response was partial. Recurrences also occurred with substantial frequency, even after an initial complete response. As such, up to 79.4% of patients required surgical intervention, and up to 23% of patients still required exenteration. Use of these agents resulted in reductions in tumor volume that may delay or prevent the need for exenteration in some, but not all, patients. Importantly, molecular analysis of tissue excised after vismodegib therapy revealed persistent tumor in all patients, with frequent accumulation of mutations that may confer resistance to further hedgehog inhibitor therapy. Although most adverse events were rated as level I or II, side effects were common, with up to 100% of patients in studies experiencing at least 1 event. Muscle cramps, alopecia, weight loss, fatigue, and dysgeusia were the most common adverse events, and several patients discontinued therapy because of them. Furthermore, 1 patient died of sepsis that may have resulted from the therapy. Although level I and II evidence are lacking, most studies indicate a benefit from the use of oral vismodegib to treat orbital and periorbital BCC tumor volume. However, patients should be cautioned about the adverse side effects of treatment and the persistence of tumor cells with mutations that may cause long-term resistance. Use of vismodegib as short-term neoadjuvant therapy may be effective in shrinking tumor volume to reduce surgical morbidity while reducing the frequency and severity of side effects. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Sonidegib for basal cell carcinoma. Methods Clinical data and skin histology were analyzed in a patient with ulcerated brown plaque on the nasal dorsum. After the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma, patient was orally given a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, Sonidegib. Results The patient was diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma. After the treatment with Sonidegib, the skin lesions became flat and ulcers were healed, without the development of new ulcers. Prior to the treatment, patient's liver and muscle enzymes were normal. Following one-week treatment with Sonidegib, the patient experienced muscle weakness, loss of appetite, vomiting, fatigue, and drowsiness, with an EGOG level of 3. After 4 weeks of treatment, the liver enzymes and serum CK were 2.5 times over normal levels. Sonidegib was discontinued at week 6 due to his intolerance of side effects. Then the patient was given the Mohs surgery and skin grafting. Conclusions Sonidegib can induce liver damage and musculoskeletal reactions. Adverse reactions should be dynamically monitored in clinical use of this drug. If the tumor is large or direct surgical removal may cause severe trauma, neoadjuvant therapy can be beneficial. In clinic, drugs can be intermittently administered according to patients' tolerance to improve tolerance and adherence.

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Sonidegib for basal cell carcinoma. Methods Clinical data and skin histology were analyzed in a patient with ulcerated brown plaque on the nasal dorsum. After the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma, patient was orally given a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, Sonidegib. Results The patient was diagnosed with basal cell carcinoma. After the treatment with Sonidegib, the skin lesions became flat and ulcers were healed, without the development of new ulcers. Prior to the treatment, patient's liver and muscle enzymes were normal. Following one-week treatment with Sonidegib, the patient experienced muscle weakness, loss of appetite, vomiting, fatigue, and drowsiness, with an EGOG level of 3. After 4 weeks of treatment, the liver enzymes and serum CK were 2.5 times over normal levels. Sonidegib was discontinued at week 6 due to his intolerance of side effects. Then the patient was given the Mohs surgery and skin grafting. Conclusions Sonidegib can induce liver damage and musculoskeletal reactions. Adverse reactions should be dynamically monitored in clinical use of this drug. If the tumor is large or direct surgical removal may cause severe trauma, neoadjuvant therapy can be beneficial. In clinic, drugs can be intermittently administered according to patients' tolerance to improve tolerance and adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) form the majority of skin cancers, with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) being the most common and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) being second. Prolonged ultraviolet (UV) exposure, aging, male gender, and immunosuppression represent most of the causes of this category of diseases. BCCs and cSCCs both include different types of skin cancers, such as nodular or morpheaform BCC or flat cSCC. Locally advanced and metastatic NMSCs cannot be treated surgically; thus, systemic therapy (TKI and Immunotherapy) is needed. Interestingly, NMSCs are frequently linked to abnormal Hedgehog (HH) signaling which most systemic immunotherapies for these cancers are based upon. Of note, the first line therapies of BCC, sonidegib and vismodegib, are HH inhibitors. Programmed death receptor 1 antibody (PD-1) inhibitors such as cemiplimab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab have been approved for the treatment of cSCC. Thus, this paper reviews the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and treatment options for both BCC and cSCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Gorlin syndrome (GS) is a genetic disorder characterized by multiple basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) due to mutations in the hedgehog signaling pathway. Patients with GS may need dozens or even hundreds of surgical procedures in their lifetime, which can leave them severely scarred, deformed, and disfigured. In 16 patients with GS, we examined the effectiveness, safety, and length of response to oral hedgehog inhibitors. According to our retrospective study, sonidegib inhibited the growth of both newly diagnosed and pre-existing basal cell carcinomas more successfully and safely than vismodegib. Nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCCS), also known as Gorlin syndrome (GS), is a genetic disorder characterized by the development of multiple cutaneous BCCs due to mutations in the hedgehog signaling pathway. The use of hedgehog pathway inhibitors—vismodegib and sonidegib—has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for managing BCCs in individuals with GS. In a retrospective study conducted between March 2012 and January 2024, a cohort of 16 Gorlin syndrome patients who received treatment with either sonidegib or vismodegib were analyzed. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety profile, and duration of response to oral hedgehog inhibitors in this patient population. The study assessed various parameters, including the number of new BCCs that developed before and after treatment initiation, the duration and sustainability of treatment responses, as well as the incidence of adverse effects associated with hedgehog inhibitor therapy. The findings of the study revealed that sustained treatment with hedgehog inhibitors could effectively suppress the progression of both new and existing BCCs. Furthermore, the results indicated that sonidegib exhibited superior efficacy and safety compared to vismodegib in the treatment of BCCs in individuals with GS. Notably, adjustments to the administration schedule of sonidegib were found to improve tolerability without compromising therapeutic efficacy, potentially leading to prolonged durations of treatment response and disease control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction In advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the issue of whether Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) should be stopped or not after clinical complete response (cCR) achievement remains an unmet clinical need. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study across 7 Italian dermato-oncology units including patients with BCC who continued vismodegib after cCR between 2012 and 2019. We assessed the relationship between the duration of vismodegib intake (days to cCR [DTCR], days to stop after cCR [DTS], total treatment days [TTD]), and disease-free survival (DFS). Reasons to stop vismodegib were (R1) toxicity and (R2) disease recurrence. The relationship between DTCR, DTS, TTD, and DFS in the whole population and in R1 subgroup was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient (P  < .05) and Bayesian statistics (BF10). Results Sixty-eight BCC patients with a median (m) age of 75.5 years (39-100) were included. Most patients were male (N  = 43, 63%), without Gorlin syndrome (N  = 56, 82%) and with head and neck area as primary site (N  = 51, 75%). After cCR, out of 68 patients, 90% (N = 61/68) discontinued vismodegib: 82% (N  = 50/61) due to toxicity (R1), and 18% (N  = 11/61) due to recurrence (R2). Conversely, 10% (N  = 7/68) continued vismodegib until last follow-up. In the whole population (N  = 68), cCR was achieved with a mDTCR of 180.50 days. DFS showed a significant correlation with DTS (P  < .01, BF10 = 39.2) and TTD (P  < .01, BF10 = 35566), while it was not correlated to DTCR (BF10 < 0.1). The analysis of R1 subgroup (N  = 50) confirmed these results. DFS correlated with DTS in all recurrent patients (N  = 38, r  = 0.44, P  < .01) and in the recurrent patients who stopped vismodegib for toxicity (N  = 26, r  = 0.665, P  < .01). DFS was longer when vismodegib was maintained for >2 months after cCR (mDFS > 2 months, N  = 54 vs. ≤ 2 months, N  = 14: 470 vs. 175 d, P  < .01). Conclusions Our retrospective results suggest that HHIs should be continued after cCR to improve DFS in BCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical determinants of complete response in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) patients receiving Sonidegib in a real-life, retrospective, observational study. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (Vismodegib and Sonidegib) are approved for the systemic treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC). The objective response rate was the primary endpoint of the trials for both drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with laBCC treated with Sonidegib at the Dermato-Oncology Unit of IFO San Gallicano between June 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were recorded. The complete response rate was the primary outcome. The median time to the best response and complete response were the secondary outcomes. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and dose adjustments were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients included in the study, eight (42.1%) achieved a complete response, seven (36.8%) had a partial response, and four experienced progressive disease (21%). The median time to the best response was 3 months in the group of patients with partial response (range 2.0-4.0, with three patients not evaluable) and 3.5 months in the group of patients with complete response (range 2-5). TRAEs occurred in 14 (73.6%) patients, with 8 (57.1%) reporting =2 TRAE categories and 6 (42.8%) >2. A total of 78.9% of patients received a modified treatment schedule; 12.5% of patients who achieved a complete response received full dosage from the beginning to the end of treatment, compared with 27.3% of those with a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: The associations between the clinical outcome of interest (objective response rate) and the clinicopathological and treatment characteristics were evaluated. No statistically significant association was observed. Our analysis confirms the observation that no statistically significant correlation exists between clinical response and Sonidegib alternate dose regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A simple quality by design aided stability indicating method was developed for quantification of sonidegib (SONI) and its process related impurities using on ultra‐performance liquid chromatography in bulk drug substance. AutoChrom and Design‐Expert software were used to predict physicochemical properties, draw Ionization graphs, and generate analytical target profile. SONI was subjected to forced degradation conditions, such as oxidative, acid hydrolysis, base hydrolysis, hydrolytic, thermal, and photolytic hydrolysis. All degradation products and process contaminants were separated using an Acquity Ethylene Bridged Hybrid C18 column in gradient elution mode with a mobile phase containing 0.02 M ammonium acetate buffer and acetonitrile: methanol (80:20 v/v). The predicted physicochemical properties are accurate and they facilitated for selection of robust conditions in development of chromatographic method with minimal trials. The developed method can be used for quantification of drug and its process related impurities in bulk drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Locally advanced (laBSCs) and metastatic basosquamous carcinomas (mBSCs) represent a therapeutic challenge. By definition, these forms are not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy, but according to literature reports, sonic hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs), anti‐programmed death 1 receptor antibodies (anti‐PD‐1), and other treatment approaches involving chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy have been used. This work features 5 real‐life cases of advanced BSCs, treated at the Dermato‐Oncology Unit of Trieste (Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste). In addition, a review of the current treatment options reported in the literature for laBSC and mBSC is provided, collecting a total of 17 patients. According to these preliminary data, HHIs such as sonidegib and vismodegib could represent a safe and effective first line of treatment, while the anti‐PD‐1 cemiplimab may be useful as a second‐line option. Chemotherapy and combined approaches involving surgery and radiotherapy have been also reported to be suitable in some patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumour in white populations. Multiple studies demonstrated that the aberrant activation of Hedgehog signaling is a driver of BCC development, and its blockade represents a potential therapeutic target. In Italy, clinicians can prescribe Hedgehog inhibitors (HhIs) Vismodegib and Sonidegib. To highlight the treatment choice of clinicians, we conducted an online survey between November 1 and November 18, 2020 with 33 Italian clinicians from 27 reference hospitals, in which each participant received an anonymous survey consisting of two multiple-choice questions on clinical efficacy and safety profile of Sonidegib and Vismodegib. Respondents reported their opinions on which efficacy and tolerability data of the pivotal phase-II BOLT trial were more relevant in the treatment choice of patients with locally advanced BCC (laBCC). This survey shows that overall response rate (ORR) and the duration of response (DoR) are the most expected across dermatologists and oncologists. The different pharmacokinetic profile of the two HhIs are behind their diverse toxicity spectrum, dose and schedule modification seem to address the choice between vismodegib and sonidegib among dermato-oncology prescribers.

Introduction: Basosquamous carcinoma is an uncommon subtype of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), characterized by aggressive local growth and metastatic potential, that mainly develops on the nose, perinasal area, and ears, representing 1.2–2.7% of all head-neck keratinocyte carcinomas. Although systemic therapy with hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) represents the first-line medical treatment in advanced BCC, to date, no standard therapy for advanced basosquamous carcinoma has been established. Herein, we reported a case series of patients affected by locally advanced basosquamous carcinomas, who were treated with HHIs. Case Presentation: Data of 5 patients receiving HHIs for locally advanced basosquamous carcinomas were retrieved (2 women and 3 males, age range: 63–89 years, average age of 77 years). Skin lesions were located on the head-neck area; in particular, 4 tumors involved orbital and periorbital area and 1 tumor developed in the retro-auricular region. A clinical response was obtained in 3 out of 5 patients (2 partial responses and 1 complete response), while disease progression was observed in the remaining 2 patients. Hence, therapy was interrupted, switching to surgery or immunotherapy. Conclusion: Increasing evidence suggests considering HHIs for large skin tumors developing in functionally and cosmetically sensitive areas, in patients with multiple comorbidities, although their use for basosquamous carcinoma require more exploration, large cohort populations, and long follow-up assessment.

Introduction: Basosquamous carcinoma is an uncommon subtype of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), characterized by aggressive local growth and metastatic potential, that mainly develops on the nose, perinasal area, and ears, representing 1.2–2.7% of all head-neck keratinocyte carcinomas. Although systemic therapy with hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) represents the first-line medical treatment in advanced BCC, to date, no standard therapy for advanced basosquamous carcinoma has been established. Herein, we reported a case series of patients affected by locally advanced basosquamous carcinomas, who were treated with HHIs. Case Presentation: Data of 5 patients receiving HHIs for locally advanced basosquamous carcinomas were retrieved (2 women and 3 males, age range: 63–89 years, average age of 77 years). Skin lesions were located on the head-neck area; in particular, 4 tumors involved orbital and periorbital area and 1 tumor developed in the retro-auricular region. A clinical response was obtained in 3 out of 5 patients (2 partial responses and 1 complete response), while disease progression was observed in the remaining 2 patients. Hence, therapy was interrupted, switching to surgery or immunotherapy. Conclusion: Increasing evidence suggests considering HHIs for large skin tumors developing in functionally and cosmetically sensitive areas, in patients with multiple comorbidities, although their use for basosquamous carcinoma require more exploration, large cohort populations, and long follow-up assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Basal cell carcinoma accounts for 75% of skin cancers worldwide and is the most common malignancy in Caucasians. Since chronic ultraviolet exposure is the major risk factor for its development, sun‐exposed areas such as the face are frequently affected. The gold‐standard treatment is surgical excision. Radiotherapy may be considered in selected cases such as unresectable primary tumors. In some patients, when the risk of a significant functional/cosmetic deficit advises against both surgery and radiotherapy, target therapy (hedgehog pathway inhibitors) can be administered alone or in a neoadjuvant setting, to reduce the tumor size and make it eligible for surgery. Vismodegib as a neoadjuvant treatment before surgery has been investigated in a single, multicentre, open‐label, phase II trial (VISMONEO); however, sonidegib has not yet been evaluated in this setting. We report the cases of two patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the face who achieved complete remission with sonidegib followed by a more limited surgical excision than would have been needed without target therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Basosquamous carcinoma (BSC), an uncommon and aggressive nonmelanoma skin cancer exhibiting characteristics ranging from basal cell carcinoma (BCC) to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), is a subject of controversy in terms of its classification, pathogenesis, histologic morphology, biologic behavior, prognosis, and management. This narrative review is based on an electronic search of English-language articles in PubMed that included the terms "basosquamous carcinoma" and/or "metatypical carcinoma of the skin" in their titles. The review aims to succinctly present and assess current data on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, dermoscopic, LC-OCT, and histopathologic characteristics, as well as the genetics and management of BSC, providing insight into this intriguing entity. As a conclusion, dermoscopy, deep incisional biopsies, and immunohistologic techniques should be applied in clinically suspicious lesions to achieve an early diagnosis and better prognosis of this tumor. Surgical treatments, including wide excision and Mohs' micrographic surgery, remain the treatment of choice. Finally, Hedgehog pathway inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors, must be thoroughly investigated with large controlled trials, since they may offer an alternative solution to irresectable or difficult-to-treat locally advanced cases of basosquamous carcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sonidegib and vismodegib are currently the only US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency-approved small-molecule Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs)for treating adults with advanced or refractory basal cell carcinoma (BCC) that is not amenable to conventional surgery or radiotherapy. At this time, there are no head-to-head clinical trials comparing these two HHIs for efficacy and safety to assist clinicians with determining which HHI may be best suited for their patients. This review briefly describes the pathogenesis of BCC, provides a detailed overview of the key pharmacokinetic profile differences between sonidegib and vismodegib, explains their pharmacodynamics, and highlights the therapeutic considerations when either HHI is used to treat special patient populations. Although both HHIs act at the same molecular target in the Hedgehog pathway, there are significant differences in their pharmacokinetic profiles that may play a potential role in their efficacy and safety. Evidence-based recommendations serve to inform clinicians until direct comparative clinical trials of sonidegib versus vismodegib are conducted to determine the clinical relevance of the reported differences in their pharmacokinetic properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The therapeutic effectiveness of the most widely used anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is constrained by its high metabolism, short half-life, and rapid drug resistance after chemotherapy. Although various nanodrug delivery systems have been reported for skin cancer therapy, their retention, penetration and targeting are still a matter of concern. Hence, in the current study, a topical gel formulation that contains a metal-organic framework (zeolitic imidazole framework; ZIF-8) loaded with 5-FU and a surface modified with sonidegib (SDG; acting as a therapeutic agent as well as a targeting ligand) (5-FU@ZIF-8 MOFs) is developed against DMBA-UV-induced BCC skin cancer in rats. The MOFs were prepared using one-pot synthesis followed by post drug loading and SDG conjugation. The optimized MOFs were incorporated into hyaluronic acid-hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose gel and further subjected to characterization. Enhanced skin deposition of the 5-FU@ZIF-8-SDG MOFs was observed using ex vivo skin permeation studies. Confocal laser microscopy studies showed that 5-FU@ZIF-8-SDG MOFs permeated the skin via the transfollicular pathway. The 5-FU@ZIF-8-SDG MOFs showed stronger cell growth inhibition in A431 cells and good biocompatibility with HaCaT cells. Histopathological studies showed that the efficacy of the optimized MOF gels improved as the epithelial cells manifested modest hyperplasia, nuclear pleomorphism, and dyskeratosis. Additionally, immunohistochemistry and protein expression studies demonstrated the improved effectiveness of the 5-FU@ZIF-8-SDG MOFs, which displayed a considerable reduction in the expression of Bcl-2 protein. Overall, the developed MOF gels showed good potential for the targeted delivery of multifunctional MOFs in topical formulations for treating BCC cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) represents a complex and clinically heterogeneous group of lesions for which curative surgery and/or radiotherapy is unlikely. Systemic therapy with hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) changed the treatment landscape for this complex patient population. Objectives: The aims of the present study are to describe the clinical characteristics of a real-life Italian cohort diagnosed with aBCC and to investigate effectiveness and safety of HHI. Methods: A multicenter observational study was performed by twelve Italian centers in the period January 1, 2016 – October 15, 2022. Patients aged ≥18 years and diagnosed with aBCC (locally advanced [laBCC] and metastatic BCC [mBCC]) were eligible for the study. Methods for investigating tumor response to HHI included clinical and dermatoscopic evaluation, radiological imaging, and histopathology. For HHI safety assessment, therapy-related adverse events (AEs) were reported and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Results: We enrolled 178 patients under treatment with HHI: 126 (70.8%) and 52 patients (29.2%) received sonidegib and vismodegib, respectively. Comprehensive data on HHI effectiveness and disease outcome were available for 132 (74.1%) of 178 patients: 129 patients had a diagnosis of laBCC (n = 84, sonidegib; n = 45, vismodegib) and 3 patients of mBCC (n = 2, vismodegib; n = 1, sonidegib, off-label). Objective response rate was 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3–68.7) and 33.3% (95% CI: 88.2–1.7) for laBCC (complete response [CR]: 43/129; PR: 56/129) and mBCC (CR: 0/3; PR: 1/3), respectively. High-risk aBCC histopathological subtypes and occurrence of >2 therapy-related AEs were significantly associated with nonresponse to HHI therapy ([OR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.09–6.05; p: 0.03] and [OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.03–7.9; p: 0.04]), respectively. Majority of our cohort (54.5%) developed at least 1 therapy-related AE, most of which were mild-moderate in severity. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness and safety profile of HHI and confirm the reproducibility of pivotal trial results in real-life clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is a skin cancer with low local aggressiveness and a low tendency to metastasize. Basosquamous Carcinoma (BSC) represents an aggressive histological subtype of BCC with intermediate features between Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and BCC. Cemiplimab is currently approved as first-line therapy in SCC and second-line therapy in BCC patients who have progressed on or are intolerant of a Hedgehog pathway Inhibitor (HHI). Our study describes the case of a 59-year-old man with BSC who was successfully treated with 5 cycles of Cemiplimab as first-line therapy and Sonidegib as second-line therapy. Currently, the efficacy of Cemiplimab against BSC and other histopathological subtypes of BCC has not been fully elucidated, as has the role of sequential or combination therapy with Cemiplimab and HHI in the management of BSC. The aim of this case report is to highlight the need to outline the use of checkpoint inhibitors in BCCs and focus attention on the synergistic role of Cemiplimab and HHIs in such a controversial entity as BSC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nevoid basal-cell carcinoma syndrome (Gorlin syndrome) is characterized by numerous cutaneous basal cell carcinomas mediated by mutations in the hedgehog pathway. Vismodegib or sonidegib represent promising treatment options. We identified 10 Gorlin patients who were treated with sonidegib (n = 6) or vismodegib (n = 4) between March 2012 and March 2022. We analyzed the activity, toxicity, and duration of the response to oral hedgehog inhibitors. The number of new tumors that developed prior to treatment or after treatment as well as the time of response and durability of responses were assessed. All patients achieved a complete remission. With a 30.7 ± 48.4-month median follow-up, the drug treatment significantly reduced the number of new basal cell cancers from a mean of 28.3 ± 24.6 prior to treatment to a mean of 1.4 ± 2.0 during treatment (p = 0.0048). The median time to develop a new basal cell cancer was 47.3 months. Three patients eventually developed localized recurrences. After resection, ongoing treatment suppressed the development of additional lesions. One patient developed numerous new drug-resistant basal cell cancers and died of acute leukemia. Six patients required treatment modifications for toxicity. Sustained hedgehog inhibitor treatment can suppress the progression of both new and existing basal cell carcinomas for an extended period. Drug administration schedule adjustments improved tolerance without altering efficacy, potentially contributing to a prolonged response duration.

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) form the majority of skin cancers, with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) being the most common and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) being second. Prolonged ultraviolet (UV) exposure, aging, male gender, and immunosuppression represent most of the causes of this category of diseases. BCCs and cSCCs both include different types of skin cancers, such as nodular or morpheaform BCC or flat cSCC. Locally advanced and metastatic NMSCs cannot be treated surgically; thus, systemic therapy (TKI and Immunotherapy) is needed. Interestingly, NMSCs are frequently linked to abnormal Hedgehog (HH) signaling which most systemic immunotherapies for these cancers are based upon. Of note, the first line therapies of BCC, sonidegib and vismodegib, are HH inhibitors. Programmed death receptor 1 antibody (PD-1) inhibitors such as cemiplimab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab have been approved for the treatment of cSCC. Thus, this paper reviews the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and treatment options for both BCC and cSCC.

Abstract Introduction Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin malignancy in Caucasians. Globally, about 20% of BCCs involve the periocular region. The treatment of periocular BCC may be very challenging because of its proximity to the intracranial structures. Thus, early diagnosis and early treatment is mandatory. Recently, the introduction of Hedgehog pathway inhibitor therapy revolutionized the management of unresectable BCCs. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of sonidegib treatment in patients affected by periocular locally advanced (la) BCC at our skin cancer center. Methods A 3-year retrospective study was carried out enrolling patients with periocular laBCC treated with sonidegib. Therapeutic response was defined as complete remission (CR) in case of complete regression of the tumor, partial remission (PR) in case of tumor regression not achieving complete remission, and stable disease (SD). Results A total 16 patients (11 men and 5 women; medium age 71.6 ± 11.5 years) with periocular laBCCs undergoing treatment with 200 mg/day of sonidegib were included in our study. Patients included in the study were treated for at least 6 months for a median duration of 9 months. Overall, CR was reported in 9/16 (56.2%) patients, PR was reported in 4/16 patients (25%), and tumor remained stable in 3 patients (18.8%). No cases of disease progression were collected. Fourteen out of 16 patients experienced multiple adverse events (AEs): dysgeusia was reported in 12 (75%) patients, muscle spasms in 13 (81%) patients, and 7 (43.7%) patients presented with alopecia. However, all of the AEs were mild and none required treatment discontinuation. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effectiveness and safety of sonidegib in the management of BCC localized at the periocular region. Even if limited, our study suggests this drug as a valuable and safe option in periocular BCC management.

Nevoid basal-cell carcinoma syndrome (Gorlin syndrome) is characterized by numerous cutaneous basal cell carcinomas mediated by mutations in the hedgehog pathway. Vismodegib or sonidegib represent promising treatment options. We identified 10 Gorlin patients who were treated with sonidegib (n = 6) or vismodegib (n = 4) between March 2012 and March 2022. We analyzed the activity, toxicity, and duration of the response to oral hedgehog inhibitors. The number of new tumors that developed prior to treatment or after treatment as well as the time of response and durability of responses were assessed. All patients achieved a complete remission. With a 30.7 ± 48.4-month median follow-up, the drug treatment significantly reduced the number of new basal cell cancers from a mean of 28.3 ± 24.6 prior to treatment to a mean of 1.4 ± 2.0 during treatment (p = 0.0048). The median time to develop a new basal cell cancer was 47.3 months. Three patients eventually developed localized recurrences. After resection, ongoing treatment suppressed the development of additional lesions. One patient developed numerous new drug-resistant basal cell cancers and died of acute leukemia. Six patients required treatment modifications for toxicity. Sustained hedgehog inhibitor treatment can suppress the progression of both new and existing basal cell carcinomas for an extended period. Drug administration schedule adjustments improved tolerance without altering efficacy, potentially contributing to a prolonged response duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (LA-BCC) is defined as that BCC in which there is radiological confirmation of invasion of certain neighboring structures in depth and also, usually, a BCC that is of a sufficient size and invasion (although there is no radiological demonstration of deep invasion) in which surgery and radiotherapy are not adequate, are insufficient or are contraindicated to achieve the cure of the tumor, either due to characteristics of the tumor itself or of the patient. Sonidegib is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma that is not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy. Material and methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter and descriptive study in nine centers in Andalusia, Spain. Patients treated with sonidegib for >3 months for locally advanced BCC were included from 1 January 2021 to 1 January 2023. Epidemiological, efficacy and safety data were collected. Results: In the present study, a total of 38 patients were included, with a median age of 76.23 years (range 40–101). Prior treatment was surgery (31.57%; n = 25), radiotherapy (15.78%; n = 6), vismodegib (31.57%; n = 12). Eleven patients had not received prior treatment. LA-BCC were located in the cephalic pole, face or scalp. There was a total response in 9/38 patients (23.7%), partial response in 25/38 patients (65.8%) and no response in 4 patients (10.52%). In 6/34 patients, the dose was reduced to 200 mg every other day until it was discontinued due to adverse effects. The main adverse effects reported were dysgeusia (n = 8), asthenia (n = 8), = 6), muscle spasms (n = 6), alopecia (n = 4) and gastrointestinal intolerance (n = 4). Discussion: Sonidegib is the second iHh authorized for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced BCC who are not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy, based on the results of the phase II clinical trial, BOLT. Sonidegib shows good effectiveness and an acceptable safety profile in routine clinical practice in the sample presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin malignancy in Caucasians. Globally, about 20% of BCCs involve the periocular region. The treatment of periocular BCC may be very challenging because of its proximity to the intracranial structures. Thus, early diagnosis and early treatment is mandatory. Recently, the introduction of Hedgehog pathway inhibitor therapy revolutionized the management of unresectable BCCs. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of sonidegib treatment in patients affected by periocular locally advanced (la) BCC at our skin cancer center. Methods: A 3-year retrospective study was carried out enrolling patients with periocular laBCC treated with sonidegib. Therapeutic response was defined as complete remission (CR) in case of complete regression of the tumor, partial remission (PR) in case of tumor regression not achieving complete remission, and stable disease (SD). Results: A total 16 patients (11 men and 5 women; medium age 71.6 ± 11.5 years) with periocular laBCCs undergoing treatment with 200 mg/day of sonidegib were included in our study. Patients included in the study were treated for at least 6 months for a median duration of 9 months. Overall, CR was reported in 9/16 (56.2%) patients, PR was reported in 4/16 patients (25%), and tumor remained stable in 3 patients (18.8%). No cases of disease progression were collected. Fourteen out of 16 patients experienced multiple adverse events (AEs): dysgeusia was reported in 12 (75%) patients, muscle spasms in 13 (81%) patients, and 7 (43.7%) patients presented with alopecia. However, all of the AEs were mild and none required treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effectiveness and safety of sonidegib in the management of BCC localized at the periocular region. Even if limited, our study suggests this drug as a valuable and safe option in periocular BCC management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myeloid neoplasms (myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS], myelofibrosis, and chronic myelomonocytic [CMML]) are aggressive hematological malignancies for which, despite recent approvals, novel therapies are needed to improve clinical outcomes. The hedgehog (HH) pathway is one of the main pathways for cancer stem cells survival and several HH inhibitors (HHi) are approved in clinical practice. Methods: Sonidegib (SON), an oral HHi, was tested in this phase 1/1b trial in combination with azacitidine (AZA, 75 mg/m2 days ×7) in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (r/r) chronic MN or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Results: Sixty‐two patients (28 [45%] newly diagnosed) were treated in this study, including 10 patients in the dose‐finding component and 52 patients in phase 1b. SON 200 mg oral daily on days 1–28 each cycle was deemed the recommended dose for phase 1b. Out of 21 rrAML patients, two achieved response (one complete response/one morphologic leukemia‐free state) with no responses seen in seven r/r MDS/CMML patients. In newly diagnosed AML/MDS, response was seen in six (three had complete remission, two had morphological leukemia‐free status) of 27 patients. Median overall survival was 26.4 and 4.7 months for newly diagnosed MDS and AML, respectively. Safety was satisfactory with common (>20%) side effects including fatigue, constipation, nausea, cough, insomnia, and diarrhea. Only 7% of patients died in the study, and none of the deaths were deemed related to treatment. Conclusions: Our study shows that AZA + SON are a safe combination in a patient with MN. Similar to other hedgehog inhibitors, this combination yielded limited response rate in patients with myeloid neoplasms. Combining sonidegib with azacitidine is safe in patients with myeloid neoplasms. Although outcome was not high for frontline therapy, in the relapsed setting, extended survival was seen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Some patients may develop locally advanced BCC with significant morbidity and with reduction in life quality. The employment of a Hedgehog inhibitor known as Vismodegib has already proven itself helpful in the management of laBCCs. Sonidegib is the most recently available drug approved for treatment of laBCCs that acts by inhibiting the Hedgehog pathway. Real-life data seem to show that efficacy and safety are similar to those already demonstrated in trials. Herein we report our experience with retrospectively collected data from laBCC patients treated with Sonidegib. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents the most common skin cancer and locally advanced BCC (laBCC) refers to an aggressive, large, infiltrative BCC that cannot be treated by surgery or radiotherapy. Sonidegib is a Hedghehog inhibitor (HHi) indicated for laBCC. This is a monocentric retrospective real-life study of laBCCs receiving Sonidegib treatment. Although Sonidegib is widely used, since its approval by Food and Drug Administration in 2015, only a limited number of real-life experiences have been reported. Eleven patients, including four patients diagnosed with Basal Cell Naevus syndrome, received treatment with Sonidegib for laBCCs. Seven (63.6%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) but only three had to discontinue treatment and were therefore excluded from the following results. Four patients (50%) achieved complete clinical remission (CR); in all cases the remission was confirmed by biopsy. Partial response (PR) was found in three patients out of eight (37.5%). One patient out of eight (12.5%) showed a steady disease (SD). None of the patients showed signs of progression during treatment with HHi. Sonidegib showed the same efficacy in treating laBCCs as already seen in trials. All four patients suffering from Basal Cell Naevus syndrome achieved disease control by being treated with Sonidegib. Consequently, we strongly advise the joint management of laBCCs through a multidisciplinary team whenever feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary cilium is a cell surface organelle that is an important component of cellular biology. While it was once believed to be a vestigial structure without biologic function, it is now known to have essential roles in critical cellular signaling pathways such as Hedgehog (HH) and Wnt. The HH and Wnt pathways are involved in pathogenesis of basal cell carcinoma and melanoma, respectively, and this knowledge is now beginning to inform therapeutic and diagnostic options for patients. The purpose of this review is to familiarize clinicians with primary cilia biology and how this complex cellular organelle has started to translate into clinical care.

BackgroundPlexiform fibromyxoma (PF) is a rare gastric tumor often confused with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. These so-called "benign" tumors often present with upper GI bleeding and gastric outlet obstruction. It was recently demonstrated that approximately one-third of PF have activation of the GLI1 oncogene, a transcription factor in the hedgehog (Hh) pathway, via a MALAT1-GLI1 fusion protein or GLI1 up-regulation. Despite this discovery, the biology of most PFs remains unknown.MethodsNext generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of PF specimens collected from three institutions (UCSD, NCI and OHSU). Fresh frozen tissue from one tumor was utilized for in vitro assays, including quantitative RT-PCR and cell viability assays following drug treatment.ResultsEight patients with PF were identified and 5 patients' tumors were analyzed by NGS. An index case had a mono-allelic PTCH1 deletion of exons 15-24 and a second case, identified in a validation cohort, also had a PTCH1 gene loss associated with a suspected long-range chromosome 9 deletion. Building on the role of Hh signaling in PF, PTCH1, a tumor suppressor protein, functions upstream of GLI1. Loss of PTCH1 induces GLI1 activation and downstream gene transcription. Utilizing fresh tissue from the index PF case, RT-qPCR analysis demonstrated expression of Hh pathway components, SMO and GLI1, as well as GLI1 transcriptional targets, CCND1 and HHIP. In turn, short-term in vitro treatment with a Hh pathway inhibitor, sonidegib, resulted in dose-dependent cell killing.ConclusionsFor the first time, we report a novel association between PTCH1 inactivation and the development of plexiform fibromyxoma. Hh pathway inhibition with SMO antagonists may represent a target to study for treating a subset of plexiform fibromyxomas.

Sensory receptors across the entire tongue are engaged during eating. However, the tongue has distinctive regions with taste (fungiform and circumvallate) and non-taste (filiform) organs that are composed of specialized epithelia, connective tissues, and innervation. The tissue regions and papillae are adapted in form and function for taste and somatosensation associated with eating. It follows that homeostasis and regeneration of distinctive papillae and taste buds with particular functional roles require tailored molecular pathways. Nonetheless, in the chemosensory field, generalizations are often made between mechanisms that regulate anterior tongue fungiform and posterior circumvallate taste papillae, without a clear distinction that highlights the singular taste cell types and receptors in the papillae. We compare and contrast signaling regulation in the tongue and emphasize the Hedgehog pathway and antagonists as prime examples of signaling differences in anterior and posterior taste and non-taste papillae. Only with more attention to the roles and regulatory signals for different taste cells in distinct tongue regions can optimal treatments for taste dysfunctions be designed. In summary, if tissues are studied from one tongue region only, with associated specialized gustatory and non-gustatory organs, an incomplete and potentially misleading picture will emerge of how lingual sensory systems are involved in eating and altered in disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The therapeutic effectiveness of the most widely used anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is constrained by its high metabolism, short half-life, and rapid drug resistance after chemotherapy. Although various nanodrug delivery systems have been reported for skin cancer therapy, their retention, penetration and targeting are still a matter of concern. Hence, in the current study, a topical gel formulation that contains a metal-organic framework (zeolitic imidazole framework; ZIF-8) loaded with 5-FU and a surface modified with sonidegib (SDG; acting as a therapeutic agent as well as a targeting ligand) (5-FU@ZIF-8 MOFs) is developed against DMBA-UV-induced BCC skin cancer in rats. The MOFs were prepared using one-pot synthesis followed by post drug loading and SDG conjugation. The optimized MOFs were incorporated into hyaluronic acid-hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose gel and further subjected to characterization. Enhanced skin deposition of the 5-FU@ZIF-8-SDG MOFs was observed using ex vivo skin permeation studies. Confocal laser microscopy studies showed that 5-FU@ZIF-8-SDG MOFs permeated the skin via the transfollicular pathway. The 5-FU@ZIF-8-SDG MOFs showed stronger cell growth inhibition in A431 cells and good biocompatibility with HaCaT cells. Histopathological studies showed that the efficacy of the optimized MOF gels improved as the epithelial cells manifested modest hyperplasia, nuclear pleomorphism, and dyskeratosis. Additionally, immunohistochemistry and protein expression studies demonstrated the improved effectiveness of the 5-FU@ZIF-8-SDG MOFs, which displayed a considerable reduction in the expression of Bcl-2 protein. Overall, the developed MOF gels showed good potential for the targeted delivery of multifunctional MOFs in topical formulations for treating BCC cancer.

Background: Sonidegib and vismodegib are Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HhIs) that play a relevant role in the management of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC). This study compared the efficacy and safety of both HhIs based on their available data using effect size measures such as number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH). Methods: We reviewed data from pivotal trials of sonidegib (BOLT) and vismodegib (ERIVANCE). The NNT for sonidegib and vismodegib was calculated from objective response rate (ORR) values. The NNH was calculated from data relating to treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and incidence of AEs. The LHH was calculated as the ratio between the corresponding NNH and NNT. Results: For sonidegib (200 mg), the NNT for ORR at 18 months was 1.65 (95% CI 1.35–2.01) whilst that for vismodegib (150 mg) at 21 months was 2.10 (95% CI 1.65–2.82). The NNH related to treatment discontinuation due to AEs was 1.9 (95% CI 1.6–2.5) for sonidegib and 1.8 (95% CI 1.4–2.2) for vismodegib. The LHH for sonidegib and vismodegib related to treatment discontinuation due to AEs was 1.14 and 0.84, respectively, whilst the LHH according to AEs of grade ≥3 was 1.41 for sonidegib and 0.85 for vismodegib. Conclusions: Sonidegib showed a better benefit–risk ratio compared to vismodegib, being more likely to achieve therapeutic response than to AEs leading to discontinuation. These results should be confirmed in clinical practice and/or in a direct comparison study.

Resumen: El carcinoma de células basales (CBC) es una de las neoplasias malignas más frecuentes, por lo que se ha convertido en una importante carga asistencial. Su incidencia se incrementa anualmente, especialmente en la población con mayor edad. A pesar de que generalmente está bien localizado, el CBC tiene la capacidad de destruir tejidos y evolucionar a un CBC localmente avanzado (CBCla) o incluso, aunque de forma más rara, a un CBC metastásico (CBCm). Las opciones terapéuticas convencionales en estos casos están bien establecidas, entre las cuales se incluyen la cirugía y la radioterapia. Sin embargo, no todos los casos son elegibles para realizar un tratamiento de tipo convencional. Recientemente, los tratamientos biológicos vienen ganando una mayor atención y son objeto de diversos estudios de investigación. De este modo se ha desarrollado una terapia dirigida utilizando los inhibidores de la vía de Hedgehog (IVH), teniendo en cuenta que se trata de una vía patogénica clave tanto en el CBCla como en el CBCm. En la actualidad, para poder tratar el CBCla y el CBCm no operables existen dos IVH aprobados: el vismodegib y el sonidegib. Esta revisión busca explorar la fisiopatología de la vía del Hedgehog responsable del desarrollo del CBC y hacer una actualización en cuanto a la eficacia, así como de las propiedades farmacocinéticas de los IVH, características que los convirtieron en la opción terapéutica ideal en el CBCla o en el CBCm, ya sea en forma de monoterapia o en combinación con alguno de los tratamientos convencionales. Abstract: As one of the most common malignancies, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has evolved as a global burden with incidence annually rising, especially in the older population. Even though the condition is mostly localized, the nature of the disease is destructive and can evolve as either locally advanced BCC (laBCC) or even more rarely as metastatic BCC (mBCC). There are well-established conventional treatment options for these cases, including surgeries and radiotherapy. However, not all cases are eligible for conventional treatments. Recently, biologic treatment has gained a lot of attention and research. This has led to the development of targeted treatment involving the hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI), a key pathogenesis in laBCC and mBCC. There are currently two approved HPIs, vismodegib and sonidegib to treat inoperable laBCC and mBCC. This review seeks to explore the pathophysiology of hedgehog pathway behind the development of BCC, and the current update of the efficacy as well as pharmacokinetics properties of HPIs that led to the ideal treatment for laBCC or mBCC, either as monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapies.

Sonidegib is a Hedgehog signalling pathway inhibitor approved for use in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) not eligible for surgery or radiotherapy. This report describes clinical experience with sonidegib in two patients with locally advanced BCC (one with a tumour adjacent to the right eye and the other with a tumour associated with the left ear) and in one patient with Gorlin syndrome. Two of the patients had recurrent and intractable tumours. Treatment with sonidegib 200 mg/day led to remission in both patients with locally advanced BCC within 7 months and to a reduction in the size and number of lesions after 4 months in the patient with Gorlin syndrome. Adverse effects reported in these patients were cramps, alopecia, ageusia and weight loss, all of which were mild and consistent with the known toxicity profile for sonidegib. Sonidegib has an important role to play in the effective treatment of challenging cases of advanced BCC. In parallel, a need remains to improve management protocols for patients with advanced BCC, particularly through earlier intervention and a multidisciplinary team approach.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have a higher risk of developing malignancies compared to the general population, due to the immunosuppressive regimens which can promote the oncogenesis process. The incidence of de novo non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in KTR is greater than in the general population. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents one of the most frequent malignancies in KTR. Sonidegib is a Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced basal-cell carcinoma (LABCC) that following surgery or radiation therapy, or is given to those candidates who are not eligible to surgery or radiation therapy. This paper reports the case of a kidney transplant patient, who developed severe acute kidney injury (AKI) due to rhabdomyolysis (RML) induced by sonidegib therapy which required renal replacement therapy (RRT). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic treatment with hedgehog inhibitors (HHis) is available to treat basal cell carcinomas but their utility is limited by adverse effects. Topical delivery methods may reduce adverse effects, but successful topical treatment depends on sufficient skin uptake, biological response, and time in tumor tissue. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current status of topical HHi delivery for BCCs and discuss barriers for translating systemic HHis into topical treatments. A literature search identified 16 preclinical studies and 7 clinical trials on the topical delivery of 12 HHis that have been clinically tested on BCCs. Preclinical studies on drug uptake demonstrated that novel formulations, and delivery- and pre-treatment techniques enhanced topical HHi delivery. Murine studies showed that the topical delivery of sonidegib, itraconazole, vitamin D₃ and CUR-61414 led to biological responses and tumor remission. In clinical trials, only topical patidegib and sonidegib led to at least a partial response in 26/86 BCCs and 30/34 patients, respectively. However, histological clearance was not observed in the samples analyzed. In conclusion, the incomplete clinical response could be due to poor HHi uptake, biodistribution or biological response over time. Novel topical delivery techniques may improve HHi delivery, but additional research on cutaneous pharmacokinetics and biological response is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sonidegib (SDG) is a USFDA-approved anticancer drug developed for treating basal cell carcinoma. The presented study is focused on forced degradation studies of SDG with special emphasis on oxidative and photolytic degradation. Stress testing was performed as per ICH guidelines in hydrolytic, oxidative, and photolytic stress, revealing the formation of 15 transformation products. The results demonstrated the sensitivity of SDG to photolytic exposure under UV-A light, as well as to oxidative stress conditions involving hydrogen peroxide and a radical initiator. The observed DPs are separated and identified using RP-LC-PDA using a linear gradient program equipped with C18 (4.6 ×250 mm, 5 µm) column. All the DPs with >0.1 % concentration are characterized using tandem mass spectrometry and DPs with complex, unstable and isomeric nature are enriched and studied using solution NMR. Enrichment studies unveiled the formation of DP-6, DP-11, DP-12 and DP-13 as major transformation products. Interpretation of characteristic fragments from MS/MS spectra, NMR chemical shifts, and NOEs are utilized to solve the structure of the DPs. Further elucidated structures are employed to propose the involved mechanisms in degradation pathway. In addition, the DPs are studied for toxicity in silico and the potential/plausible carcinogenic, genotoxic and mutagenic nature of the DPs are illustrated. [Display omitted] • Hydrolytic, oxidative and photolytic degradation behaviour of sonidegib (SDG) according to ICH Q1A (R2) guidelines. • Fifteen degradation products, including N-oxide isomers, an amide, a dioxo impurity, and a nitrated adduct, are analysed. • Enrichment studies unveil the susceptibility of SDG to photolytic and oxidative stress with transformation to oxidized forms. • 2D NMR studies are utilized to elucidate the unstable positional N-oxide isomers and dioxo oxidative product. • Mechanistic transformation is proposed and in silico toxicity predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of oxidative DPs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The BOLT study for sonidegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HHI) approved for patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy, used modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) for laBCC tumor evaluation. The ERIVANCE study for vismodegib, another HHI, used a composite RECIST endpoint of ≥30% reduction in externally visible tumor or radiographic dimension, or complete ulceration resolution. This preplanned sensitivity BOLT analysis evaluated efficacy outcomes using ERIVANCE-like criteria in patients with laBCC who received sonidegib 200 mg once daily. Methods This phase 2, double-blind study randomized patients 1:2 to sonidegib 200:800 mg daily, respectively. Key endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). laBCC tumors were assessed by both mRECIST and ERIVANCE-like criteria. Per mRECIST, an overall response of CR was based on negative histology; photographic assessment of CR, PR (scar/fibrosis only), SD (scar/fibrosis only), or not available (NA); and a magnetic resonance imaging response of CR or NA. An overall response of CR was primarily based on negative histology using ERIVANCE-like criteria. Results Per mRECIST criteria, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) by central and investigator review for patients with laBCC (n = 66) was 56.1% (43.3–68.3%) and 71.2% (58.7–81.7%), respectively. CR per central review was achieved in 3 (4.5%) patients and PR, SD, and PD occurred in 34 (51.5%), 23 (34.8%), and 1 (1.5%) patient, respectively. Median (95% CI) DOR was 26.1 months (not estimable [NE]). Using ERIVANCE-like criteria, efficacy outcomes per central and investigator review were higher, with an ORR (95% CI) of 60.6% (47.8–72.4%) and 74.2% (62.0–84.2%), respectively. CR per central review was reached in 14 (21.2%) patients and PR, SD, and PD occurred in 26 (39.4%), 20 (30.3%), and 1 (1.5%) patient, respectively. DOR was unchanged with a median (95% CI) of 26.1 months (NE). Conclusions Overall, applying ERIVANCE-like criteria to patients with laBCC receiving sonidegib 200 mg daily yielded higher response rates vs mRECIST criteria. Trial registration BOLT registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01327053 ) on March 30, 2011.

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Our structure-based virtual screening of the FDA-approved drug library has revealed that sonidegib, a smoothened antagonist clinically used to treat basal cell carcinoma, is a potential c-Jun N-terminal kinase 3 (JNK3) inhibitor. This study investigated the binding of sonidegib to JNK3 via 19F NMR and its inhibitory effect on JNK phosphorylation in BV2 cells. Pharmacological properties of sonidegib to exert anti-inflammatory and anti-migratory effects were also characterized. We found that sonidegib bound to the ATP binding site of JNK3 and inhibited JNK phosphorylation in BV2 cells, confirming our virtual screening results. Sonidegib also inhibited the phosphorylation of MKK4 and c-Jun, the upstream and downstream signals of JNK, respectively. It reduced the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced production of pro-inflammatory factors, including interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and nitric oxide (NO), and the expression of inducible NO synthase and cyclooxygenase-2. The LPS-induced cell migration was suppressed by sonidegib. Sonidegib inhibited the LPS-induced IκBα phosphorylation, thereby blocking NF-κB nuclear translocation. Consistent with these findings, orally administered sonidegib attenuated IL-6 and TNF-α levels in the brains of LPS-treated mice. Collectively, our results indicate that sonidegib suppresses inflammation and cell migration in LPS-treated BV2 cells and mice by inhibiting JNK and NF-κB signaling. Therefore, sonidegib may be implicated for drug repurposing to alleviate neuroinflammation associated with microglial activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignancy in humans with a range of treatment options available. Tumor and patient characteristics aid in risk-stratification, which influences treatment considerations. Here, we review the advancements in surgical, topical, field, immunotherapeutic, molecular-targeted, and experimental treatment modalities that can be employed in the correct clinical setting for the treatment of BCC. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the most common cancer in humans, is a malignant neoplasm of cells derived from the basal layer of the epidermis. Tumor characteristics such as histologic subtype, primary versus recurrent tumor, anatomic location, size, and patient attributes determine the risk level and acceptable treatment options. Surgical options offer histologic confirmation of tumor clearance. Standard excision provides post-treatment histologic assessment, while Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) provides complete margin assessment intraoperatively. Additional treatment options may be employed in the correct clinical context. Small and low-risk BCCs, broad field cancerization, locally-advanced disease, metastatic disease, cosmetic concerns, or morbidity with surgical approaches raise consideration of other treatment modalities. We review herein a range of treatment approaches and advances in treatments for BCC, including standard excision, MMS, electrodesiccation and curettage, ablative laser treatment, radiation therapy, targeted molecular therapies, topical therapies, field therapies, immunotherapy, and experimental therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Adult medulloblastoma is an extremely rare tumor of the central nervous system. Standard multimodal treatment, comprising maximal safe surgical resection followed by craniospinal radiotherapy and multi-agent chemotherapy, can improve the prognosis of this disease, producing, however, important acute and long-term toxicities. Herein, we review the state of the art for adult medulloblastoma diagnosis and treatment, presenting novel molecular advances and their therapeutic implications and discussing the central role of hub centers to guarantee the highest quality of care and a better overall outcome for this rare tumor. Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant embryonal tumor of the posterior fossa belonging to the family of primitive neuro-ectodermic tumors (PNET). MB generally occurs in pediatric age, but in 14–30% of cases, it affects the adults, mostly below the age of 40, with an incidence of 0.6 per million per year, representing about 0.4–1% of tumors of the nervous system in adults. Unlike pediatric MB, robust prospective trials are scarce for the post-puberal population, due to the low incidence of MB in adolescent and young adults. Thus, current MB treatments for older patients are largely extrapolated from the pediatric experience, but the transferability and applicability of these paradigms to adults remain an open question. Adult MB is distinct from MB in children from a molecular and clinical perspective. Here, we review the management of adult MB, reporting the recent published literature focusing on the effectiveness of upfront chemotherapy, the development of targeted therapies, and the potential role of a reduced dose of radiotherapy in treating this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]