Search

Background The success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is reduced in persistent AF (PsAF) compared to paroxysmal AF. Adjunctive ablation strategies have failed to show consistent incremental benefit over PVI alone in randomized studies. The left atrial posterior wall is a potential source of non-PV triggers and atrial substrate which may promote the initiation and maintenance of PsAF. Adding posterior wall isolation (PWI) to PVI had shown conflicting outcomes, with earlier studies confounded by methodological limitations. Objectives To determine whether combining PWI with PVI significantly improves freedom from AF recurrence, compared to PVI alone, in patients with PsAF. Methods This is a multi-center, prospective, international randomized clinical trial. 338 patients with symptomatic PsAF refractory to anti-arrhythmic therapy (AAD) will be randomized to either PVI alone or PVI with PWI in a 1:1 ratio. PVI involves wide antral circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, utilizing contact force sensing ablation catheters. PWI involves the creation of a floor line connecting the inferior aspect of the PVs, and a roof line connecting the superior aspect of the PVs. Follow up is for a minimum of 12 months with rhythm monitoring via implantable cardiac device and/or loop monitor, or frequent intermittent monitoring with an ECG device. The primary outcome is freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of > 30 seconds off AAD at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. Conclusions This randomized study aims to determine the success and safety of adjunctive PWI to PVI in patients with persistent AF.

Objectives This study sought to describe expected changes in a mirror-image prone electrocardiogram (ECG) compared with normal supine, including a range of cardiac conditions. Background Unwell COVID-19 patients are at risk of cardiac complications. Prone ventilation is recommended but poses practical challenges to acquisition of a 12-lead ECG. The effects of prone positioning on the ECG remain unknown. Methods 100 patients each underwent 3 ECGs: standard supine front (SF); prone position with precordial leads attached to front (PF); and prone with precordial leads attached to back in a mirror image to front (PB). Results Prone positioning was associated with QTc prolongation (PF 437 ± 32 ms vs. SF 432 ± 31 ms; p, Central Illustration

Objectives This study sought to determine the long-term outcomes of restoring sinus rhythm with catheter ablation (CA). Background The CAMERA-MRI (Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure—An MRI-Guided Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial) study demonstrated that restoration of sinus rhythm with CA significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with medical rate control (MRC) at 6 months in persistent atrial fibrillation and otherwise unexplained systolic heart failure. However, the long-term outcomes have not been reported. Methods Patients enrolled in the CAMERA-MRI study were followed for 4 years with echocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance. CA involved pulmonary vein isolation and posterior left atrial wall isolation in 94%. Patients crossed over to CA after 6-month study duration. Arrhythmia burden was determined with implanted cardiac monitors or cardiac devices. Results Sixty-six patients (age 62 ± 10 years, atrial fibrillation duration of 22 ± 16 months, and LVEF 33 ± 9%) were randomized 1:1 to CA versus MRC. Eighteen of 33 patients crossed over from MRC group to CA group. At 4.0 ± 0.9 years, atrial fibrillation recurred in 27 patients (57%) in the CA group with a mean burden of 10.6 ± 21.2% after 1.4 ± 0.6 procedures. There was an absolute increase in LVEF with CA of 16.4 ± 13.3% compared with 8.6 ± 7.6% in MRC (p = 0.001). In the CA group, the absence of ventricular late gadolinium enhancement was associated with a greater improvement in absolute LVEF (19 ± 13% vs. 10 ± 11% in the late gadolinium enhancement–positive group; p = 0.04) and LVEF normalization in 19 patients (58%) versus 4 patients (18%) in the late gadolinium enhancement–positive group (p = 0.008) at 4.0 ± 0.9 years follow-up. Conclusions CA is superior to MRC in improving LVEF in the long term in patients with atrial fibrillation and systolic heart failure. The greatest recovery in systolic function was demonstrated in the absence of ventricular fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance.

Background Female gender is associated with an increased recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA). Although AF is more common in men, women constitute a significant proportion with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether multiple ablation procedures improves arrhythmia outcomes in females with PsAF compared to men. Methods We performed a multicenter observational study to determine long-term arrhythmia outcomes in patients undergoing >1 CA for PsAF. CA involved pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with additional ablation including linear, posterior wall isolation, electrogram-guided, or a combination of these. Results A total of 281 patients had >1 ablation procedure for PsAF and were included in this analysis (mean age 58.7 ± 9.3 years; 86 [30.6%] female; left atrial [LA] area 27.0 ± 5.3 cm2; PsAF duration 1.7 ± 1.7 years). At mean follow-up of 45.5 ± 31.8 months, freedom from recurrent AF was present in 148 patients(52.7%) after 2.2 ± 0.5 procedures. After multivariate analysis, female gender (hazard ratio [HR] 2.10; P Conclusion Female gender was independently and strongly associated with arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing multiple procedures for PsAF. PV reconnection was less likely, and fewer reconnected PVs occurred in women. Further studies are required to better understand the mechanisms responsible for AF in females to assist in closing the gender gap in the success of CA.

ImportancePulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is less effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with paroxysmal AF. The left atrial posterior wall may contribute to maintenance of persistent AF, and posterior wall isolation (PWI) is a common PVI adjunct. However, PWI has not been subjected to randomized comparison.ObjectiveTo compare PVI with PWI vs PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time catheter ablation.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsInvestigator initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 11 centers in 3 countries (Australia, Canada, UK). Symptomatic patients with persistent AF were randomized 1:1 to either PVI with PWI or PVI alone. Patients were enrolled July 2018-March 2021, with 1-year follow-up completed March 2022.InterventionsThe PVI with PWI group (n = 170) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation followed by posterior wall isolation involving linear ablation at the roof and floor to achieve electrical isolation. The PVI-alone group (n = 168) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation alone.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. The 23 secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, AF burden between study groups at 12 months, procedural outcomes, and complications.ResultsAmong 338 patients randomized (median age, 65.6 [IQR, 13.1] years; 76.9% men), 330 (97.6%) completed the study. After 12 months, 89 patients (52.4%) assigned to PVI with PWI were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure, compared with 90 (53.6%) assigned to PVI alone (between-group difference, –1.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.73-1.36]; P = .98). Of the secondary end points, 9 showed no significant difference, including freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (58.2% for PVI with PWI vs 60.1% for PVI alone; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.79-1.55]; P = .57), freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (68.2% vs 72%; HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.80-1.78]; P = .36) or AF burden (0% [IQR, 0%-2.3%] vs 0% [IQR, 0%-2.8%], P = .47). Mean procedural times (142 [SD, 69] vs 121 [SD, 57] minutes, P P Conclusions and RelevanceIn patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for persistent AF, the addition of PWI to PVI alone did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months compared with PVI alone. These findings do not support the empirical inclusion of PWI for ablation of persistent AF.Trial Registrationanzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001436460

This study sought to determine the long-term outcomes of restoring sinus rhythm with catheter ablation (CA).The CAMERA-MRI (Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure-An MRI-Guided Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial) study demonstrated that restoration of sinus rhythm with CA significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with medical rate control (MRC) at 6 months in persistent atrial fibrillation and otherwise unexplained systolic heart failure. However, the long-term outcomes have not been reported.Patients enrolled in the CAMERA-MRI study were followed for 4 years with echocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance. CA involved pulmonary vein isolation and posterior left atrial wall isolation in 94%. Patients crossed over to CA after 6-month study duration. Arrhythmia burden was determined with implanted cardiac monitors or cardiac devices.Sixty-six patients (age 62 ± 10 years, atrial fibrillation duration of 22 ± 16 months, and LVEF 33 ± 9%) were randomized 1:1 to CA versus MRC. Eighteen of 33 patients crossed over from MRC group to CA group. At 4.0 ± 0.9 years, atrial fibrillation recurred in 27 patients (57%) in the CA group with a mean burden of 10.6 ± 21.2% after 1.4 ± 0.6 procedures. There was an absolute increase in LVEF with CA of 16.4 ± 13.3% compared with 8.6 ± 7.6% in MRC (p = 0.001). In the CA group, the absence of ventricular late gadolinium enhancement was associated with a greater improvement in absolute LVEF (19 ± 13% vs. 10 ± 11% in the late gadolinium enhancement-positive group; p = 0.04) and LVEF normalization in 19 patients (58%) versus 4 patients (18%) in the late gadolinium enhancement-positive group (p = 0.008) at 4.0 ± 0.9 years follow-up.CA is superior to MRC in improving LVEF in the long term in patients with atrial fibrillation and systolic heart failure. The greatest recovery in systolic function was demonstrated in the absence of ventricular fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance.

Excessive alcohol consumption is associated with incident atrial fibrillation and adverse atrial remodeling; however, the effect of abstinence from alcohol on secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation is unclear.We conducted a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial at six hospitals in Australia. Adults who consumed 10 or more standard drinks (with 1 standard drink containing approximately 12 g of pure alcohol) per week and who had paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation in sinus rhythm at baseline were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either abstain from alcohol or continue their usual alcohol consumption. The two primary end points were freedom from recurrence of atrial fibrillation (after a 2-week "blanking period") and total atrial fibrillation burden (proportion of time in atrial fibrillation) during 6 months of follow-up.Of 140 patients who underwent randomization (85% men; mean [±SD] age, 62±9 years), 70 were assigned to the abstinence group and 70 to the control group. Patients in the abstinence group reduced their alcohol intake from 16.8±7.7 to 2.1±3.7 standard drinks per week (a reduction of 87.5%), and patients in the control group reduced their alcohol intake from 16.4±6.9 to 13.2±6.5 drinks per week (a reduction of 19.5%). After a 2-week blanking period, atrial fibrillation recurred in 37 of 70 patients (53%) in the abstinence group and in 51 of 70 patients (73%) in the control group. The abstinence group had a longer period before recurrence of atrial fibrillation than the control group (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.84; P = 0.005). The atrial fibrillation burden over 6 months of follow-up was significantly lower in the abstinence group than in the control group (median percentage of time in atrial fibrillation, 0.5% [interquartile range, 0.0 to 3.0] vs. 1.2% [interquartile range, 0.0 to 10.3]; P = 0.01).Abstinence from alcohol reduced arrhythmia recurrences in regular drinkers with atrial fibrillation. (Funded by the Government of Victoria Operational Infrastructure Support Program and others; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12616000256471.).

Objectives This study sought to determine if diffuse ventricular fibrosis improves in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)-mediated cardiomyopathy following the restoration of sinus rhythm. Background AF coexists in 30% of heart failure (HF) patients and may be an underrecognized reversible cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Myocardial fibrosis is the hallmark of adverse cardiac remodeling in HF, yet its reversibility is unclear. Methods Patients with persistent AF and an idiopathic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤45%) were randomized to catheter ablation (CA) or ongoing medical rate control as a pre-specified substudy of the CAMERA-MRI (Catheter Ablation versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction—an MRI-Guided Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial) trial. All patients had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scans (including myocardial T1 time), serum B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-min walk tests, and Short Form-36 questionnaires performed at baseline and 6 months. Sixteen patients with no history of AF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction were enrolled as normal controls for T1 time. Results Thirty-six patients (18 in each treatment arm) were included in this substudy. Demographics, comorbidities, and myocardial T1 times were well matched at baseline. At 6 months, patients in the CA group had a significant reduction in myocardial T1 time from baseline compared with the medical rate control group (−124 ms; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −23 to −225 ms; p = 0.0176), although it remained higher than that of normal controls at 6 months (p = 0.0017). Improvements in myocardial T1 time with CA were associated with significant improvements in absolute LVEF (+12.5%; 95% CI: 5.9% to 19.0%; p = 0.0004), left ventricular end-systolic volume (p = 0.0019), and serum B-type natriuretic peptide (−216 ng/l; 95% CI: −23 to −225 ng/l; p = 0.0125). Conclusions The improvement in LVEF and reverse ventricular remodeling following successful CA of AF-mediated cardiomyopathy is accompanied by a regression of diffuse fibrosis. This suggests timely treatment of arrhythmia-mediated cardiomyopathy may minimize irreversible ventricular remodeling.

Objectives This study sought to characterize the biatrial substrate in heart failure (HF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and HF frequently coexist; however, the contribution of HF to the biatrial substrate in PeAF is unclear. Methods Consecutive patients with PeAF and normal left ventricular (NLV) systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] >55%) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (LVEF ≤45%) undergoing AF ablation were enrolled. In AF, pulmonary vein (PV) cycle length (PVCL) was recorded via a multipolar catheter in each PV and in the left atrial appendage for 100 consecutive cycles. After electrical cardioversion, biatrial electroanatomic mapping was performed. Complex electrograms, voltage, scarring, and conduction velocity were assessed. Results Forty patients, 20 patients with HF (mean age: 62 ± 8.9 years; AF duration: 15 ± 11 months; LVEF: 33 ± 8.4%) and 20 with NLV (mean age: 59 ± 6.7 years; AF duration: 14 ± 9.1 months; p = 0.69; mean LVEF: 61 ± 3.6%; p Conclusions HF is associated with significantly reduced biatrial tissue voltage, fractionation, and prolongation of PVCL. Advanced biatrial remodeling may have implications for invasive and noninvasive rhythm control strategies in patients with AF and HF.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) frequently co-exist despite adequate rate control. Existing randomized studies of AF and LVSD of varying etiologies have reported modest benefits with a rhythm control strategy. Objectives The goal of this study was to determine whether catheter ablation (CA) for AF could improve LVSD compared with medical rate control (MRC) where the etiology of the LVSD was unexplained, apart from the presence of AF. Methods This multicenter, randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with persistent AF and idiopathic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤45%). After optimization of rate control, patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess LVEF and late gadolinium enhancement, indicative of ventricular fibrosis, before randomization to either CA or ongoing MRC. CA included pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall isolation. AF burden post-CA was assessed by using an implanted loop recorder, and adequacy of MRC was assessed by using serial Holter monitoring. The primary endpoint was change in LVEF on repeat CMR at 6 months. Results A total of 301 patients were screened; 68 patients were enrolled between November 2013 and October 2016 and randomized with 33 in each arm (accounting for 2 dropouts). The average AF burden post-CA was 1.6 ± 5.0% at 6 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis, absolute LVEF improved by 18 ± 13% in the CA group compared with 4.4 ± 13% in the MRC group (p Conclusions AF is an underappreciated reversible cause of LVSD in this population despite adequate rate control. The restoration of sinus rhythm with CA results in significant improvements in ventricular function, particularly in the absence of ventricular fibrosis on CMR. This outcome challenges the current treatment paradigm that rate control is the appropriate strategy in patients with AF and LVSD. (Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction [CAMERA-MRI]; ACTRN12613000880741)

Introduction The right atrium (RA) is readily accessible; however, it is unclear whether changes in the RA are representative of the LA. We performed detailed bi-atrial electroanatomic mapping to determine the electrophysiological relationship between the atria. Methods and results Consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent bi-atrial electroanatomical mapping with a contact force catheter acquiring points with a CF > 10 g prior to ablation. Points were analyzed for tissue voltage, complex electrograms, low voltage (

The DORMANT-AF Study: Electrophysiological and Hemodynamic Assessment. DORMANT-AF StudyIntroduction: Electrophysiological and Hemodynamic Assessment. DORMANT-AF Study The significance of adenosine induced dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains controversial. The optimal dose of adenosine to determine dormant PV conduction is yet to be systematically explored. Methods and Results: Electrophysiological and Hemodynamic Assessment. DORMANT-AF Study Consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation received 3 adenosine doses (12, 18, and 24 mg) in a randomized blinded order, immediately after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Electrophysiological (PR prolongation, AV block (AVB) and PV reconnection) and hemodynamic (BP) parameters were measured. A total, 339 doses (113/dose) assessed 191 PVs in 50 patients (66% male, 72% PAF, 52% hypertensive). Dormant PV conduction occurred in 28% of patients (16.5% [32] of PVs). All cases were associated with AVB (AVB: PV reconnection vs. no PV reconnection 100% vs. 83%, P = 0.007). AVB occurred more frequently at 24 mg versus 12 mg (92% vs. 82%, P = 0.019) but not versus 18 mg (91%, P = 0.62). AVB duration progressed between 12 mg (12.0 ± 8.9 seconds), 18 mg (16.1 ± 9.1 seconds, P = 0.001), and 24 mg (19.0 ± 9.3 seconds, P 110 kg (65% vs. 91% in 70–110 kg group, P < 0.001) in response to adenosine was seen. Conclusion: Electrophysiological and Hemodynamic Assessment. DORMANT-AF Study An adenosine dose producing AVB is required to unmask dormant PV conduction. AVB is significantly reduced in patients >110 kg. Weight and dosing variability may in part explain the conflicting results of studies evaluating the clinical utility of adenosine in PVI.

Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The intervenous ridge (IVR) may be incorporated into ablation strategies to achieve PVI; however, randomized trials are lacking. We performed a randomized multi-centre international study to compare the outcomes of (i) circumferential antral PVI (CPVI) alone ( minimal ) vs. (ii) CPVI with IVR ablation to achieve individual PVI ( maximal ). Methods and results Two hundred and thirty-four patients with paroxysmal AF underwent CPVI and were randomized to a minimal or maximal ablation strategy. The primary outcome of recurrent atrial arrhythmia was assessed with 7-day Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months. PVI was achieved in all patients. Radiofrequency ablation time was longer in the maximal group (46.6 ± 14.6 vs. 41.5 ± 13.1 min; P < 0.01), with no significant differences in procedural or fluoroscopy times. At mean follow-up of 17 ± 8 months, there was no difference in freedom from AF after a single procedure between a minimal (70%) and maximal ablation strategy (62%; P = 0.25). In the minimal group, ablation was required on the IVR to achieve electrical isolation in 44%, and was associated with a significant reduction in freedom from AF (57%) compared with the minimal group without IVR ablation (80%; P < 0.01). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference in freedom from AF between a minimal and maximal ablation strategy. Despite attempts to achieve PVI with antral ablation, IVR ablation is commonly required. Patients in whom antral isolation can be achieved without IVR ablation have higher long-term freedom from AF (the Minimax study; ACTRN12610000863033).

Background Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone of catheter ablation (CA) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (PeAF), although less successful than for paroxysmal AF. Whether rapid or fibrillatory (PV AF) PV firing may identify patients with PeAF more likely to benefit from a PV-based ablation approach is unclear. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the PV cycle length (PVCL) and the PV AF outcome after CA. Methods Before ablation, the multipolar catheter was placed in each PV and the left atrial appendage (LAA) for 100 consecutive cycles. The presence of PV AF, the average PVCL of all 4 veins (PV 4VAverage ), the fastest vein average (PV FVAverage ), the fastest cycle length (PV Fast ) both individually and relative to the average LAA cycle length were calculated. The ablation strategy included PVI and posterior wall isolation with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Results A total of 123 patients underwent CA (age 62 ± 9.1 years; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASC score 1.6 ± 1.1; left ventricular ejection fraction 48% ± 13%; left atrial area 31 ± 8.7 cm 2 ; AF duration 16 ± 17 months). PVI was achieved in 100% of patients. Multiprocedure success (MPS; freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia episodes lasting >30 seconds) was achieved in 76% of patients at 24 ± 8.1 months of follow-up after 1.2 ± 0.4 procedures. PV activity was not associated with MPS either absolutely (PV 4VAverage [MPS no vs yes: 178 ± 27 ms vs 177 ± 24 ms; P = .92], PV FVAverage [ P = .69], or PV Fast [ P = .82]) or as a ratio relative to the LAA cycle length (PV 4VAverage /LAA 1.05 ± 0.11 vs 1.06 ± 0.21; P = .87). The presence of PV AF (31% vs 47%; P = .13) did not predict MPS. Conclusion The rapidity of PV firing or presence of fibrillation within the PV was not predictive of outcome of CA for PeAF. PV activity does not identify patients most likely to benefit from a PV-based ablation strategy.

Background— There is a complex interplay between the atria and ventricles in atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides detailed tissue characterization, identifying focal ventricular fibrosis with late gadolinium enhancement (ventricular late gadolinium enhancement) and diffuse fibrosis with postcontrast-enhanced T 1 mapping. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between postcontrast ventricular T 1 relaxation time on CMR and freedom from AF after pulmonary vein isolation. Methods and Results— One hundred three patients undergoing catheter ablation for symptomatic AF (66% paroxysmal AF; age, 58±10 years; left atrial area, 27±7 cm 2 ) underwent preprocedure CMR to determine postcontrast ventricular T 1 time. Follow-up included clinical review and 7-day Holter monitors at 6 monthly intervals. All patients underwent successful pulmonary vein isolation. At a mean follow-up of 15±7 months, the single procedure success was 74%. Postcontrast ventricular T 1 time was significantly shorter in patients with recurrent AF (366±73 ms) versus patients without AF recurrence (428±90 ms; P =0.002). Univariate predictors of AF recurrence included postcontrast ventricular T 1 time, AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent), AF duration, and body mass index. After multivariate analysis, ventricular T 1 time ( P =0.03) and AF duration ( P =0.03) were the only independent predictors. Freedom from AF was present in 84% of patients with a postcontrast ventricular T 1 time >380 ms versus 56% in patients with a postcontrast ventricular T 1 time P =0.002). Conclusions— A shorter postcontrast ventricular T 1 relaxation time on CMR is associated with reduced freedom from AF after catheter ablation. Diffuse ventricular fibrosis as demonstrated by CMR may, in part, explain recurrent AF after AF ablation.

The impact of diffuse atrial fibrosis detected by T1 mapping on the clinical outcome after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unknown.This study aimed to validate and assess the impact of post-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging atrial T1 mapping on the clinical outcome after catheter ablation for AF.CMR imaging was performed in 3 groups by using a clinical 1.5-T scanner: controls, patients with paroxysmal AF, and patients with persistent AF. A T1 mapping sequence was used to calculate the post-contrast T1 relaxation time (T1 time) at the interatrial septum as an index of diffuse atrial fibrosis. A subset underwent left atrial endocardial bipolar voltage mapping for electrophysiologic correlation. After AF ablation, patients underwent clinical review and 7-day Holter monitoring at 6-month intervals.One hundred thirty-two patients (20 controls, 71 (63%) patients with paroxysmal AF, and 41 (37%) patients with persistent AF) underwent CMR imaging. Post-contrast atrial T1 time was significantly shorter in AF groups (237 ± 42 ms) than in controls (280 ± 37 ms) (P.001). Post-contrast atrial T1 time correlated with mean septal voltage (R2 = .48; P.001) and global left atrial voltage (R(2) = .41; P.001). A diagnosis of AF, AF duration, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume independently predicted shortened post-contrast atrial T1 time. The single procedure success rate was 74% at 12 ± 5 months postablation. Post-contrast atrial T1 time was the only predictor of arrhythmia recurrence in multivariate analysis (P = .015). A post-contrast atrial T1 time of230 ms was associated with freedom from AF in 85% relative to 62% with a post-contrast atrial T1 time of230 ms (P = .01).Post-contrast atrial T1 time as measured using CMR imaging provides an index of atrial fibrosis that correlates with tissue voltage, presence of AF, and clinical outcomes after catheter ablation.

There is a complex interplay between the atria and ventricles in atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides detailed tissue characterization, identifying focal ventricular fibrosis with late gadolinium enhancement (ventricular late gadolinium enhancement) and diffuse fibrosis with postcontrast-enhanced T1 mapping. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between postcontrast ventricular T1 relaxation time on CMR and freedom from AF after pulmonary vein isolation.One hundred three patients undergoing catheter ablation for symptomatic AF (66% paroxysmal AF; age, 58±10 years; left atrial area, 27±7 cm(2)) underwent preprocedure CMR to determine postcontrast ventricular T1 time. Follow-up included clinical review and 7-day Holter monitors at 6 monthly intervals. All patients underwent successful pulmonary vein isolation. At a mean follow-up of 15±7 months, the single procedure success was 74%. Postcontrast ventricular T1 time was significantly shorter in patients with recurrent AF (366±73 ms) versus patients without AF recurrence (428±90 ms; P=0.002). Univariate predictors of AF recurrence included postcontrast ventricular T1 time, AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent), AF duration, and body mass index. After multivariate analysis, ventricular T1 time (P=0.03) and AF duration (P=0.03) were the only independent predictors. Freedom from AF was present in 84% of patients with a postcontrast ventricular T1 time380 ms versus 56% in patients with a postcontrast ventricular T1 time380 ms (P=0.002).A shorter postcontrast ventricular T1 relaxation time on CMR is associated with reduced freedom from AF after catheter ablation. Diffuse ventricular fibrosis as demonstrated by CMR may, in part, explain recurrent AF after AF ablation.

Circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, PV reconnection remains problematic.To assess the impact of PV anatomy on outcome after AF ablation.One hundred two patients with paroxysmal AF underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (60%) or computed tomography (40%) before AF ablation. PV anatomy was classified according to the presence of common PVs, accessory PVs, PV branching pattern, and the dimensions of the PV ostia, intervenous ridges (IVRs), and the left PV-left atrial appendage ridge.Four discrete PVs were present in 48(47%) of the patients: a left common PV in 38(37%), a right common PV in 2(2%), an accessory right PV in 20(20%), and left PV in 4(4%). At a mean follow-up of 12 ± 4 months, 75 of 102 (74%) patients were free of recurrent AF. A LCPV was associated with an increase in freedom from AF (87% vs 66% for 4 PV anatomy; P = .03). Greater left IVR length (16.9 ± 3.5 mm vs 14.0 ± 3.0 mm; P ≤ .001) and width (1.4 ± 0.6 mm vs 1.1 ± 0.6 mm; P = .02) were associated with increased AF recurrence. After multivariate analysis, abnormal anatomy (LCPV or accessory PV) and left IVR length were found to be the only independent predictors of freedom from AF.Four discrete PVs are present in the minority of patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PV isolation. The presence of a LCPV is associated with an increased freedom from AF after catheter ablation. PV anatomy may in part explain the variable outcome to electrical isolation in patients with paroxysmal AF.