Search

Discrimination between sensory stimuli associated with safety and threat is crucial for behavioral decisions. Discriminative conditioning paradigms with two acoustic conditioned stimuli (one paired with shock [CS+], the other unpaired with shock [CS-]) have been widely used as an experimental model for fear learning. However, no attention has been paid to the effect of the CS- on safety in the paradigms, because the CS- served as a neutral cue or elevated the freezing level due to fear generalization although less effectively than the CS+. By using a noise and a tone as two acoustic CSs in a discriminative auditory fear conditioning (AFC) paradigm, here we demonstrate that mice learn safety for the CS- while showing fear for the CS+ with opposing emotional behaviors. We found that after learning mice exhibited a significant suppression of context-dependent freezing during the CS-, but not during the CS+, indicating learned safety without fear generalization for the CS-. In contrast, the mice showed an enhanced level of freezing during the CS+ even in a novel spatial context, indicating cued fear for the CS+. Moreover, the CS+ also induced rapid defensive behaviors, whereas the CS- disinhibited normal exploratory behaviors. On the other hand, mice showed no significant suppression of contextual fear during the CS- in a paradigm with a pair of tone CSs at different frequencies, although they clearly discriminated the two tones. These results suggest our AFC paradigm with the noise and tone CSs as a useful experimental model for cue-dependent discriminative learning of safety and threat.

[Display omitted] • We studied spectrotemporal integration in guinea pig auditory cortex with imaging. • The integration showed region-dependency in the primary auditory cortex. • A linear function describes the suppressive nonlinear effect in the integration. Spectrotemporal integration is a key function of our auditory system for discriminating spectrotemporally complex sounds, such as words. Response latency in the auditory cortex is known to change with the millisecond time-scale depending on acoustic parameters, such as sound frequency and intensity. The functional significance of the millisecond-range latency difference in the integration remains unclear. Actually, whether the auditory cortex has a sensitivity to the millisecond-range difference has not been systematically examined. Herein, we examined the sensitivity in the primary auditory cortex (A1) using voltage-sensitive dye imaging techniques in guinea pigs. Bandpass noise bursts in two different bands (band-noises), centered at 1 and 16 kHz, respectively, were used for the examination. Onset times of individual band-noises (spectral onset-times) were varied to virtually cancel or magnify the latency difference observed with the band-noises. Conventionally defined nonlinear effects in integration were analyzed at A1 with varying sound intensities (or response latencies) and/or spectral onset-times of the two band-noises. The nonlinear effect measured in the high-frequency region of the A1 linearly changed depending on the millisecond difference of the response onset-times, which were estimated from the spatially-local response latencies and spectral onset-times. In contrast, the low-frequency region of the A1 had no significant sensitivity to the millisecond difference. The millisecond-range latency difference may have functional significance in the spectrotemporal integration with the millisecond time-scale sensitivity at the high-frequency region of A1 but not at the low-frequency region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]