1. Deploying a metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis consensus care pathway: findings from an educational pilot in three health systems
- Author
-
Sonal Kumar, Arpan Mohanty, Parvez Mantry, Robert E. Schwartz, Madeleine Haff, George Therapondos, Mazen Noureddin, Douglas Dieterich, Nigel Girgrah, Kristi Cohn, Mohanish Savanth, and Michael Fuchs
- Subjects
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease ,Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis ,MASLD ,MASH ,Care pathway ,Guidelines-based care ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Abstract Background Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly referred to as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, impacts 30% of the global population. This educational pilot focused on the role primary care providers may play in the delivery of guidelines-based metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) care. Objective Accelerate the application of guidelines-based MASH care pathways to clinical workflows. Methods A panel of six hepatologists was convened in 2021 to develop the care pathway and the subsequent pilot occurred between 2022 – 2023. The pilot was conducted across three U.S. health systems: Boston Medical Center (Boston), Methodist Health System (Dallas), and Weill Cornell Medicine (New York). Clinicians were educated on the care pathway and completed baseline/follow-up assessments. 19 primary care clinicians participated in the educational pilot baseline assessment, nine primary care clinicians completed the two-month assessment, and 15 primary care clinicians completed the four-month assessment. The primary endpoint was to assess clinician-reported adherence to and satisfaction with the care pathway. The pilot was deemed exempt by the Western Consensus Group Institutional Review Board. Results At baseline, 38.10% (n = 8) of respondents felt they had received sufficient training on when to refer a patient suspected of metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease to hepatology, and 42.86% (n = 9) had not referred any patients suspected of metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease to hepatology within a month. At four months post-intervention, 79% (n = 15) of respondents agreed or strongly agreed they received sufficient training on when to refer a patient suspected of metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease to hepatology, and there was a 25.7% increase in self-reported adherence to the institution’s referral guidelines. Barriers to care pathway adherence included burden of manually calculating fibrosis-4 scores and difficulty ordering non-invasive diagnostics. Conclusions With therapeutics anticipated to enter the market this year, health systems leadership must consider opportunities to streamline the identification, referral, and management of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Electronic integration of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis care pathways may address implementation challenges.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF