Search

We study the phase transitions in the simplicial Ising model on hypergraphs, in which the energy within each hyperedge (group) is lowered only when all the member spins are unanimously aligned. The Hamiltonian of the model is equivalent to a weighted sum of lower-order interactions, evoking an Ising model defined on a simplicial complex. Using the Landau free energy approach within the mean-field theory, we identify diverse phase transitions depending on the sizes of hyperedges. Specifically, when all hyperedges have the same size $q$, the nature of the transitions shifts from continuous to discontinuous at the tricritical point $q=4$, with the transition temperatures varying nonmonotonically, revealing the ambivalent effects of group size $q$. Furthermore, if both pairwise edges and hyperedges of size $q>2$ coexist in a hypergraph, novel scenarios emerge, including mixed-order and double transitions, particularly for $q>8$. Adopting the Bethe--Peierls method, we investigate the interplay between pairwise and higher-order interactions in achieving global magnetization, illuminating the multiscale nature of the higher-order dynamics.

Hidden geometry enables the investigation of complex networks at different scales. Extending this framework to multiplex networks, we uncover a novel kind of mesoscopic organization in real multiplex systems, named $\textit{clan}$, a group of nodes that preserve their local geometric arrangement across layers. Furthermore, we reveal the intimate relationship between the unfolding of clan structure and mutual percolation against targeted attacks, leading to an ambivalent role of clans: making a system fragile yet less prone to complete shattering. Finally, we confirm the correlation between the multiscale nature of geometric organization and the overall robustness. Our findings expand the significance of hidden geometry in network function, while also highlighting potential pitfalls in evaluating and controlling catastrophic failure of multiplex systems.

Exploitation universally emerges in various decision-making contexts, e.g., animals foraging, web surfing, the evolution of scientists' research topics, and our daily lives. Despite its ubiquity, exploitation, which refers to the behavior of revisiting previous experiences, has often been considered to delay the search process of finding a target. In this paper, we investigate how exploitation affects search performance by applying a non-Markovian random walk model, where a walker randomly revisits a previously visited node using long-term memory. We analytically study two broad forms of network structures, namely (i) clique-like networks and (ii) lollipop-like networks, and find that exploitation can significantly improve search performance in lollipop-like networks whereas it hinders target search in clique-like networks. Moreover, we numerically verify that exploitation can reduce the time needed to fully explore the underlying networks by using $550$ diverse real-world networks. Based on the analytic result, we define the lollipop-likeness of a network and observe a positive relationship between the advantage of exploitation and lollipop-likeness., Comment: 12 pages, 7 figures

Team chemistry is the holy grail of understanding collaborative human behavior, yet its quantitative understanding remains inconclusive. To reveal the presence and mechanisms of team chemistry in scientific collaboration, we reconstruct the publication histories of 560,689 individual scientists and 1,026,196 duos of scientists. We identify ability discrepancies between teams and their members, enabling us to evaluate team chemistry in a way that is robust against prior experience of collaboration and inherent randomness. Furthermore, our network analysis uncovers a nontrivial modular structure that allows us to predict team chemistry between scientists who have never collaborated before. Research interest is the highest correlated ingredient of team chemistry among six personal characteristics that have been commonly attributed as the keys to successful collaboration, yet the diversity of the characteristics cannot completely explain team chemistry. Our results may lead to unlocking the hidden potential of collaboration by the matching of well-paired scientists.