Search

Accurate detection and analysis of somatic variants in cancer involve multiple third-party tools with complex dependencies and configurations, leading to laborious, error-prone, and time-consuming data conversions. This approach lacks accuracy, reproducibility, and portability, limiting clinical application. Musta was developed to address these issues as an end-to-end pipeline for detecting, classifying, and interpreting cancer mutations. Musta is based on a Python command-line tool designed to manage tumor-normal samples for precise somatic mutation analysis. The core is a Snakemake-based workflow that covers all key cancer genomics steps, including variant calling, mutational signature deconvolution, variant annotation, driver gene detection, pathway analysis, and tumor heterogeneity estimation. Musta is easy to install on any system via Docker, with a Makefile handling installation, configuration, and execution, allowing for full or partial pipeline runs. Musta has been validated at the CRS4-NGS Core facility and tested on large datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Beijing Institute of Genomics. Musta has proven robust and flexible for somatic variant analysis in cancer. It is user-friendly, requiring no specialized programming skills, and enables data processing with a single command line. Its reproducibility ensures consistent results across users following the same protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The accurate screening of tumor genomic landscapes for somatic mutations using high-throughput sequencing involves a crucial step in precise clinical diagnosis and targeted therapy. However, the complex inherent features of cancer tissue, especially, tumor genetic intra-heterogeneity coupled with the problem of sequencing and alignment artifacts, makes somatic variant calling a challenging task. Current variant filtering strategies, such as rule-based filtering and consensus voting of different algorithms, have previously helped to increase specificity, although comes at the cost of sensitivity. Methods In light of this, we have developed the NeoMutate framework which incorporates 7 supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms to exploit the strengths of multiple variant callers, using a non-redundant set of biological and sequence features. We benchmarked NeoMutate by simulating more than 10,000 bona fide cancer-related mutations into three well-characterized Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) reference samples. Results A robust and exhaustive evaluation of NeoMutate’s performance based on 5-fold cross validation experiments, in addition to 3 independent tests, demonstrated a substantially improved variant detection accuracy compared to any of its individual composite variant callers and consensus calling of multiple tools. Conclusions We show here that integrating multiple tools in an ensemble ML layer optimizes somatic variant detection rates, leading to a potentially improved variant selection framework for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Gene panel sequencing has become a common diagnostic tool for detecting somatically acquired mutations in myeloid neoplasms. However, many panels have restricted content, provide insufficient sensitivity levels, or lack clinically validated workflows. We here describe the development and validation of the Genomic Medicine Sweden myeloid gene panel (GMS-MGP), a capture-based 191 gene panel including mandatory genes in contemporary guidelines as well as emerging candidates. The GMS-MGP displayed uniform coverage across all targets, including recognized difficult GC-rich areas. The validation of 117 previously described somatic variants showed a 100% concordance with a limit-of-detection of a 0.5% variant allele frequency (VAF), achieved by utilizing error correction and filtering against a panel-of-normals. A national interlaboratory comparison investigating 56 somatic variants demonstrated highly concordant results in both detection rate and reported VAFs. In addition, prospective analysis of 323 patients analyzed with the GMS-MGP as part of standard-of-care identified clinically significant genes as well as recurrent mutations in less well-studied genes. In conclusion, the GMS-MGP workflow supports sensitive detection of all clinically relevant genes, facilitates novel findings, and is, based on the capture-based design, easy to update once new guidelines become available. The GMS-MGP provides an important step toward nationally harmonized precision diagnostics of myeloid malignancies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The accurate screening of tumor genomic landscapes for somatic mutations using high-throughput sequencing involves a crucial step in precise clinical diagnosis and targeted therapy. However, the complex inherent features of cancer tissue, especially, tumor genetic intra-heterogeneity coupled with the problem of sequencing and alignment artifacts, makes somatic variant calling a challenging task. Current variant filtering strategies, such as rule-based filtering and consensus voting of different algorithms, have previously helped to increase specificity, although comes at the cost of sensitivity. Methods: In light of this, we have developed the NeoMutate framework which incorporates 7 supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms to exploit the strengths of multiple variant callers, using a non-redundant set of biological and sequence features. We benchmarked NeoMutate by simulating more than 10,000 bona fide cancer-related mutations into three well-characterized Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) reference samples. Results: A robust and exhaustive evaluation of NeoMutate's performance based on 5-fold cross validation experiments, in addition to 3 independent tests, demonstrated a substantially improved variant detection accuracy compared to any of its individual composite variant callers and consensus calling of multiple tools. Conclusions: We show here that integrating multiple tools in an ensemble ML layer optimizes somatic variant detection rates, leading to a potentially improved variant selection framework for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer gene panel testing requires accurate detection of somatic mosaic mutations, as the test sample consists of a mixture of cancer cells and normal cells; each minor clone in the tumor also has different somatic mutations. Several studies have shown that the different types of software used for variant calling for next generation sequencing (NGS) can detect low-frequency somatic mutations. However, the accuracy of these somatic variant callers is unknown. We performed cancer gene panel testing in duplicate experiments using three different high-fidelity DNA polymerases in pre-capture amplification steps and analyzed by three different variant callers, Strelka2, Mutect2, and LoFreq. We selected six somatic variants that were detected in both experiments with more than two polymerases and by at least one variant caller. Among them, five single nucleotide variants were verified by CEL nuclease-mediated heteroduplex incision with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining (CHIPS) and Sanger sequencing. In silico analysis indicated that the FBXW7 and MAP3K1 missense mutations cause damage at the protein level. Comparing three somatic variant callers, we found that Strelka2 detected more variants than Mutect2 and LoFreq. We conclude that dual sequencing with Strelka2 analysis is useful for detection of accurate somatic mutations in cancer gene panel testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This chapter contains a step-by-step protocol for identifying somatic SNPs and small Indels from next-generation sequencing data of tumor samples and matching normal samples. The workflow presented here is largely based on the Broad Institute's "Best Practices" guidelines and makes use of their Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) platform. Variants are annotated with population allele frequencies and curated resources such as GnomAD and ClinVar and curated effect predictions from dbNSFP using VCFtools, SnpEff, and SnpSift.