Search

Objective: To investigate the influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure during pneumoperitoneum on splanchnic circulation. Design: Open study. Setting: University hospital, Sweden. Subjects: Five otherwise healthy patients (mean age of 34 years), undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Interventions: Arterial and hepatic vein catheterization and simultaneous arterial and hepatic vein blood gas sampling in the awake state, during anaesthesia, after the establishment of pneumoperitoneum (intra-abdominal pressure level 11-13 mmHg) and after 30 and 60 minutes of pneumoperitoneum. Main outcome measures: Hepatic blood flow was estimated by the continuous infusion method and used as a measure of splanchnic blood flow. Splanchnic oxygen consumption was calculated according to the Fick principle. Results and conclusion: Splanchnic blood flow and splanchnic oxygen consumption were not affected by pneumoperitoneum at this level of intra-abdominal pressure.

Background: Pneumoperitoneum (PP) for laparoscopic surgery induces prompt changes in circulatory parameters. The rapid onset of these changes suggests a reflex origin, and the present study was undertaken to evaluate whether release of vasopressor substances could be responsible for these alterations. The influence of two different anesthesia techniques was also evaluated. Methods: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I patients, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were investigated. The first group (n = 10) was anesthetized intravenously. The second group (n = 6) had inhalation anesthesia. Plasma vasopressin, catecholamines, and plasma renin activity were investigated as neurohumoral vasopressor markers of circulatory stress. The general stress response to surgery was assessed by analysis of plasma cortisol. Results: Induction of pneumoperitoneum caused no apparent activation of vasopressor substances, although several hemodynamic parameters responded promptly. Conclusion: The hemodynamic alterations, seen at the establishment of PP during stable anesthesia, cannot be explained by elevation of vasopressor substances in circulating blood.

Laparoscopic surgery involves the use of intra-abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation (pneumoperitoneum). The increased intra-abdominal pressure causes marked haemodynamic changes, which may influence electrocardiographic monitoring. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the influence of pneumoperitoneum on vectorcardiographic recordings. METHODS: Vectorcardiographic changes (QRS vector difference = QRS-VD, QRS loop area, QRS magnitude, ST vector magnitude, spatial ST vector change) were recorded continuously applying computerized vectorcardiography in 12 anaesthetised cardiovascularly healthy patients, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Measurements were made before and during pneumoperitoneum in three different body positions (supine, Trendelenburg and reversed Trendelenburg), also employing transesophageal echocardiography and invasive blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: Pneumoperitoneum significantly increased QRS-VD, in parallel with an enlargement in loop area and magnitude. The magnitude was significantly increased in the transversal and frontal planes and there was a tendency to increase the magnitude in the sagittal plane. The increase in QRS-VD reached levels previously associated with the development of myocardial ischaemia in patients with coronary artery disease. The ST-variables were not changed by the pneumoperitoneum. The positional changes also influenced QRS-VD significantly. CONCLUSIONS: When computerized vectorcardiography is used for ischaemia monitoring during pneumoperitoneum, the ST-variables seem reliable. However, vectorcardiographicQRS-changes should be interpreted with caution, as the QRS alterations found during pneumoperitoneum mimic the changes seen during myocardial ischaemia.

The laparoscopic operating technique is being applied increasingly to a variety of intra‐abdominal operations. Intra–abdominal gas insufflation, i.e. pneumoperitoneum (PP), is then used to allow surgical access. The haemodynamic effects of PP in combination with different body positions have not been fully examined. Eleven patients without signs of cardiopulmonary disease were studied before and during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under propofol–fentanyl anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Swan‐Ganz and radial arterial catheterization were used to determine haemodynamic data in the horizontal position, with a 15–20° head–down tilt and a 15–20° head–up tilt. The measurements were repeated after insufflation of carbon dioxide to an intraabdominal pressure of 11–13 mmHg, as well as during surgery. The ventricular filling pressures of the heart were strictly dependent on body position. PP in the horizontal position increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure by 32% (P < 0.01), central venous pressure by 58% (P < 0.01), and mean arterial pressure by 39% (P < 0.01). When PP was combined with a head–down tilt, there was a further increase in filling pressures by approximately 40% (P < 0.01), while the reduction in filling pressures during the head–up tilt was counteracted by PP. During PP with a head–up tilt, the filling pressures did not differ from those in the horizontal position without PP. CI showed a certain dependency on filling pressures. It is concluded that PP causes signs of elevated preload and afterload. The combination of PP and a head–up tilt is associated only with signs of an elevated afterload. It is suggested that the haemodynamic response to PP, especially in combination with a head–down tilt, may be hazardous to patients with compromised heart function.