Search

Background: Pre-existing comorbidities increase the likelihood of post-stroke dysphagia. This study investigates comorbidity prevalence in patients with dysphagia after ischemic stroke., Methods: The data of patients with acute ischemic stroke from two large representative cohorts (STROKE-CARD trial 2014-2019 and STROKE-CARD registry 2020-2022 - both study center Innsbruck, Austria) were analyzed for the presence of dysphagia at hospital admission (clinical swallowing examination). Comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)., Results: Of 2054 patients with ischemic stroke, 17.2% showed dysphagia at hospital admission. Patients with dysphagia were older (77.8 ± 11.9 vs. 73.6 ± 14.3 years, p < 0.001), had more severe strokes (NIHSS 7(4-12) vs. 2(1-4), p < 0.001) and had higher CCI scores (4.7 ± 2.1 vs. 3.8 ± 2.0, p < 0.001) than those without swallowing impairment. Dysphagia correlated with hypertension (p = 0.034), atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.002), non-smoking status (p = 0.014), myocardial infarction (p = 0.002), heart failure (p = 0.002), peripheral arterial disease (p < 0.001), severe chronic liver disease (p = 0.002) and kidney disease (p = 0.010). After adjusting for relevant factors, the associations with dysphagia remained significant for diabetes (p = 0.005), peripheral arterial disease (p = 0.007), kidney disease (p = 0.014), liver disease (p = 0.003) and overall CCI (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Patients with multiple comorbidities have a higher risk of developing post-stroke dysphagia. Therefore, early and thorough screening for swallowing impairment after acute ischemic stroke is crucial especially in those with multiple concomitant diseases., Trial Registration: Stroke Card Registry (NCT04582825), Stroke Card Trial (NCT02156778)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Dysphagia is associated with poor outcome, higher mortality, reduced quality of life, and social isolation. We investigate the relationship between swallowing impairment and symptoms of anxiety and depression after ischemic stroke., Methods: Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke participating in the prospective STROKE-CARD Registry study from 2020 to 2022 were assessed for dysphagia on hospital admission (clinical swallowing assessment) and for persistence until discharge and 3-month follow-up (SINGER Independency Index). Anxiety and depression symptoms were recorded using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 3-month follow-up., Results: Of 648 patients, 19.3% had dysphagia on admission, persisting in 14.8% at discharge and 6.8% at 3-month follow-up. With the presence or duration of dysphagia (no dysphagia, dysphagia at baseline, at discharge, at 3 months), score (mean ± SD) increased on the BDI (7.9 ± 6.7, 12.5 ± 8.7, 13.5 ± 9.0, 16.5 ± 10.2), HADS-D (4.4 ± 3.7, 7.1 ± 4.2, 7.7 ± 4.4, 9.8 ± 4.3), and HADS-A (4.4 ± 3.5, 5.4 ± 3.6, 6.0 ± 3.6, 7.0 ± 3.6). In linear regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, dementia, and either functional disability or stroke severity, BDI and HADS-D scores were significantly higher in patients with dysphagia across all points in time (admission, discharge, 3-month follow-up). An independent association with HADS-A scores was only evident in patients with persisting dysphagia after 3 months. Patients with dysphagia were more likely to receive antidepressants, antipsychotics, or benzodiazepines at discharge and 3-month follow-up., Conclusions: Dysphagia after stroke is common and severely affects psychosocial functioning of individuals. Our results highlight swallowing impairment as an independent predictor for poststroke depressive and, to a lesser extent, anxiety symptoms., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Aim: To provide a comprehensive overview of how stroke nurses manage solid medication (SM) delivery to patients with post-stroke dysphagia., Design: Cross-sectional study., Methods: A self-administered online survey was carried out among nurses in German-speaking countries between September and December 2021., Results: Out of a total of 754 responses, analysis was conducted on 195 nurses who reported working on a stroke unit. To identify swallowing difficulties in acute stroke care, 99 nurses indicated routinely administering standardised screenings, while 10 use unvalidated screenings, and 82 are waiting for a specialist evaluation. Regardless of whether screening methods are used or not, most preferred a non-oral route of medication administration for patients with suspected dysphagia. None of the respondents reported administering whole SMs orally to patients. If screening methods indicate dysphagia, approximately half of the respondents would modify SMs. Participants who stated to use the Gugging Swallowing Screen managed the SM intake guided by its severity levels. One-third of the group who awaited assessment by the dysphagia specialist provided modified medication before the consultation., Conclusion: Most of the nurses on stroke units use swallowing screens and avoid the administration of whole SMs in post-stroke dysphagia. In addition to the non-oral administration, SMs are modified if dysphagia is suspected. Precise guidance on the administration of SM is needed, based on screening tests and prior to expert consultation., Trial and Protocol Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: Registration ID: NCT05173051/ Protocol ID: 11TS003721., Implications for the Profession And/or Patient Care: The present paper serves to alert nurses to the issue of patient safety when administering medication for acute stroke-induced dysphagia., Impact: SM delivery after acute stroke-induced dysphagia is often neglected. While nurses are aware of the risk associated with dysphagia and would not give whole SMs to patients, the modification of tablets and their administration with semisolids are common., Reporting Method: This study was reported according to the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)