the modality and long-term outcomes of both non-invasive (US/CT/MRI) and invasive (EUS) surveillance in these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate each modality in the detection of pancreatic cancer during surveillance of IPMN to validate the current guidelines. Methods: Between June 2007 and January 2014, 535 asymptomatic high-risk individuals (HRIs) with either pancreatic cysts (O5mm) or a dilated main pancreatic duct (O2.5mm) were examined periodically at a single center, using pancreatic protocol US (pUS) (every 3 or 6 month) and CT or MRI (once a year). EUS was performed when any changes such as hypoechoic mass, new nodule or rapid change in cyst size were detected by pUS. ERCP was recommended for cytology when the size of the cyst became bigger than 3cm, the main pancreatic duct was dilated bigger than 3mm, a newly narrowed part appeared or the size of the cyst or main pancreatic duct changed rapidly. EUS-FNA was performed when an invasive nodule or a hypoechoic mass was detected. Contrast harmonic pUS/EUS was also performed when necessary. Results: Thirteen cases of IPMN with malignancy were confirmed during follow up (2.4% incidence rate). 8 males and 5 females (mean ageZ69.3 yrs). Seven patients had an IPMN with associated carcinoma (2: invasive, 5: non-invasive), Six patients had a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma concomitant with IPMN. The median total follow up period until the detection of cancer was 34 months (range 9 64 mo). The number of patients in cancer stages 0, IA, IIA, IIB, III, was 5, 3, 2, 1 and 2, respectively. Of the thirteen patients with IPMN, at the time of cancer diagnosis, 7 had cysts of!2cm, 3 had cysts of 2-3cm, and 3 had cysts of O3cm. The 7 patients with cysts less than 2 cm were found to have multiple cysts. Invasive cancer showed hypo-vascularity in pUS/CE-EUS. All pancreatic cancers smaller than 10mm were detected using pUS or EUS but not by CT or MRI. Conclusion: Contrary to current guidelines for the management of IPMN, more surveillance is recommended for patients of IPMN with multiple small cysts because pancreatic cancer can develop in those cases. pUS or EUS are recommended to detect pancreatic cancer in early stages during surveillance rather than CT/MRI. 1037 Serum Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Messenger RNA As a Novel Marker for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Kazuya Matsumoto*, Norimasa Miura, Yohei Takeda, Takumi Onoyama, Soichiro Kawata, Kenichi Harada, Yoshikazu Murawaki Department of Gastroenterology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Yonago, Japan; Department of Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Science, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUSFNA) used as a diagnostic modality for a pancreatic mass has an accuracy of 8591%. However, the institutions that are capable of performing EUS-FNA are limited. The conventional biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have an accuracy of at most around 70%, and are especially difficult to use to distinguish between a PDAC and a pancreatic inflammatory lesion or a benign stricture of the main pancreatic duct (MPD), and between intra-ductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC) and intra-ductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). Therefore, a novel surrogate marker is needed for clinical use. Using a very small amount of mRNA from the human serum, we have established a method to quantify human telomerase reverse transcriptase mRNA (hTERT mRNA) expression. Objective: We examined the usefulness of the serum hTERT mRNA as a biomarker for PDAC. Methods: Eighty-three cases (45 pancreatic cancers, 38 non-pancreatic cancers) were treated in our hospital from December 2011 to October 2012. After removing the cellular component from the serum by centrifugal separation, we did RNA extraction and purification with a DNase treatment, finally hTERT mRNA levels were measured by using a KAPA SYBR FAST Universal One-Step qRT-PCR Kit with SYBR Green I (KAPA BIOSYSTEMS, Boston, USA). Results: The serum hTERT mRNA was significantly higher for PDAC (5285.6 15320.0 copy/serum 10ml) than for pancreatic inflammatory lesions or benign strictures of the MPD (1050.9 807.5 copy/serum 10ml, P! 0.05). Furthermore, the average serum hTERT mRNA of IPMC was significantly higher (2863.6 1291.8 copy/serum 10ml) than that of IPMN (846.5 926.1 copy/ serum 10ml, P! 0.05). Using a cut-off value of 924 (copy/serum 10ml), calculated based on a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the pancreatic malignancies diagnostic ability of hTERT mRNA had a sensitivity of 97.8%, a specificity of 76.3%, a positive-predictive value (PPV) of 83.0%, a negative-predictive value (NPV) of 96.7% and an accuracy of 88.0%. Compared with conventional tumor markers, the sensitivity, NPV and the accuracy of hTERTmRNA for pancreatic malignancies were significantly improved. Regarding the T factor in the pancreatic malignancies, the sensitivity of T1/ T2/ T3/ T4 was 100%/ 100% 100%/ 96.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The measurement of serum hTERT mRNA was useful for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. 1038 Characteristics and Outcomes of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms With Indeterminate CEA Levels Obtained by Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA): Results of a Multicenter Study Diana Jaiyeola*, David Grande, Sachin Wani, Brian C. Brauer, Norio Fukami, Raj J. Shah, Stuart K. Amateau, Roy D. Yen, Richard D. Schulick, Barish H. Edil, Lindsay Hosford, www.giejournal.org Vol Timothy Donahue, V. Raman Muthusamy, Rabindra R. Watson, Alireza Sedarat, Jitin Makker, Phillip S. Ge, Daniel Mullady, Steven A. Edmundowicz, Riad R. Azar, Faris Murad, Vladimir M. Kushnir, Dayna S. Early, Srinivas Gaddam, Dyanna Gregory, Rajesh N. Keswani, Srinadh Komanduri NorthwesternUniversity,Chicago, IL; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO Introduction: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels measured from fluid obtained by EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are used to distinguish between mucinous and non-mucinous cysts. While high accuracy rates with levels O200 ng/ ml for mucinous lesions has been reported, management of PCN with indeterminate CEA levels (5-200ng/ml) is unclear. Aim: To compare clinical parameters and outcomes in patients with indeterminate CEA PCN to patients with CEA O200. Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing EUS for evaluation of pancreatic cysts. Demographics and EUS morphology, and FNA results were recorded. Univariate analysis to compare those with indeterminate CEA levels (5-200) to those with CEA O200 ng/ml was performed followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of operative intervention. Results: A total of 3112 patients (59% female, 56% Caucasian) were referred for EUS evaluation of PCN at four tertiary care centers from 2008-2013. The majority of cysts (1828, 58.7%) were identified on body imaging (CT: 54.4%, MR: 10.3%) performed for evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms (Table 1). EUS-FNA was performed in 2385 (76.6%) cases of which 1141 (47.6%) had CEA levels!200, 565 (23.8%) had CEA levels O200, and 679 (28.6%) patients had only cytology available. Mean EUS cyst size was significantly greater in those with CEA! 200 (29.2mm 22.9 vs. 24.2mm 15.6, (p!0.01)), while median CEA levels were 37 (18-58, CEA!200) and 687 (362-2818,CEA O200). EUS findings of mural nodularity and cytologic findings of mucin, atypia, and cancer were significantly greater in the high CEA cohort(Table 1). A total of 148 (13.0%) patients with CEA!200 were recommended to stop any further imaging compared to 2 (0.4%) of patients with CEA O200 (pZ0.01). As such, a significantly larger percentage (40.2% vs. 14.0%, p!0.01) of patients with CEA O200 were referred for surgical consultation. On multivariate logistic regression, cyst size (pZ0.003, OR: 1.13/10mm increase (1.07-5.21), CEA levelsO200 (pZ0.01, OR: 1.08 (1.01-3.04) and abnormal cytology (pZ0.04, OR 2.06 (1.34-4.21) were independent predictors of operative intervention. However, despite these findings, a total of 185 (16.2%) patients with CEA! 200 had mucinous or malignant cytology. Conclusions: This large multicenter outcomes study demonstrates that cyst fluid CEA levels O200 are suboptimal for evaluation of PCN as 16% of mucinous or malignant cysts are missed using this cutoff. Despite this, endosonographers and surgeons continue to make clinical decisions based on a cyst fluid CEA O200. The current study demonstrates the importance of continued surveillance of patients with indeterminate CEA levels and the need for more sensitive diagnostic strategies for PCN. Table 1. Clinical Parameters and Outcomes for PCN with indeterminate and elevated CEA levels