Search

Recent studies have shown social determinants of health (SDOH) to impact HIV care engagement. This cross-sectional study (Oct 20-Apr 21) assessed the impact of a range of SDOH on HIV care engagement using data from HIV Care Connect, a consortium of three HIV care facility-led programs (Alabama, Florida, Mississippi). The exposures were captured using the PRAPARE (Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences) scale. The outcome was captured using the Index of Engagement in HIV Care scale. Participants (n = 132) were predominantly non-White (87%) and male (52%) with a median age of 41 years. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for various sociodemographics showed lower HIV care engagement to be associated with being uninsured/publicly insured, having 1-3 unmet needs, socially integrating ≤five times/week, and having stable housing. Factors such as unmet needs, un-/underinsurance, and social integration may be addressed by healthcare and community organizations. Plain Language Summary: Assessing How Social Drivers of Health Affect Engagement in HIV Care in the Southern United States It has been found that social factors that have a direct impact on health affect engagement in HIV Care among people living with HIV. We included various social drivers of health to see how they affect engagement in HIV Care. We used data between October 2020 and April 2021 from a project titled HIV Care Connect, which is a group of three facilities providing HIV care in Alabama, Florida, and Mississippi. We used social drivers of health as risk factors from a scale called PRAPARE (Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences). Engagement in HIV care was measured by using a scale called Index of Engagement in HIV Care. A total of 132 participants were included. Majority of the participants were of races other than white (87%), male (52%) and were aged 41 years on average. Statistical analysis showed that participants without insurance or with public insurance, participants with 1-3 unsatisfied needs, participants that met with other people less than or equal to five times a week, and participants that had reliable housing had lower engagement in HIV care. These factors have a potential to be addressed by healthcare and community organizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined the role of partnership status (married, unmarried-partnered, and unpartnered) on retention in care among newly diagnosed (2013–2017), cisgender heterosexual people with HIV in Birmingham, Alabama (n = 152). This study evaluated all scheduled HIV primary care provider visits for two years following diagnosis date. A kept-visit measure was calculated such that, if an individual attended ≥1 visit in each of the four 6-month intervals, they were considered to have high visit constancy. A missed-visit measure was categorized as ≥1 no-show vs. 0 no-show for first and second year after diagnosis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using logistic regression models. Models were adjusted for confounding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The study population was 76% Black, 57% male, median age of 37 years. Overall, 65% had high visit consistency and 34.5% had ≥1 no-show in both years. Compared to unpartnered, married individuals had higher visit constancy [AOR (95% CI): 2.88 (1.02, 8.16)]; no differences were observed among unmarried-partnered individuals. No differences in having ≥1 no-show among partnership status groups were observed for either year. These findings suggest potential success of interventions involving a social confidant in optimizing retention in care among newly diagnosed, heterosexual PWH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Alabama Quality Management Group (AQMG), a consortium of 9 Ryan White-funded part C and D clinics, distributed statewide was established in 2006 under the guidance from the Health and Resources Services Administration with a clinical quality improvement (CQI) focus., Methods: We describe the origins and evolution of the AQMG, including requisite shifts from aggregate clinic-wide to de-identified individual-level data reporting for implementation of the Data for Care (D4C-AL) Alabama program. The D4C-AL strategy uses a clinic-wide risk stratification of all patients based on missed clinic visits in the previous 12 months. Intermediate (1-2 missed visits) and high-risk patients (>3 missed visits) receive the evidence-informed Retention through Enhanced Personal Contact intervention. We report on a pilot of the D4CAL program in 4 of 33 primary HIV care clinics at the UAB 1917 Clinic., Results: Among 3859 patients seen between April 2018 and February 2019, the missed visit rate was not significantly different between the D4C-1917 (19.2%) and non-D4C clinics (20.5%) in a preintervention period (May 2017-April 2018). However, a significantly lower missed visit rate was observed in the D4C-1917 vs. non-D4C-1917 clinics during the intervention period (April 2018-February 2019, P = 0.049)., Conclusions: The AQMG has been transformed into a health service research and implementation science platform, building on a shared vision, mission, data reporting, and quality improvement focus. Moreover, CQI may be viewed as an implementation strategy that seeks to enhance uptake and sustained use of effective interventions with D4C-AL representing a prototype for future initiatives embedded within extant quality improvement consortia.