Search

Postcardiac arrest shock (PCAS) is defined by hemodynamic instability occurring in the first hours after cardiac arrest (CA) and is a major cause of mortality among patients hospitalized after CA. It includes vasoplegia and myocardial dysfunction. This postcardiac arrest myocardial dysfunction is supposed to recover within the 3 days. However, there are many unknowns regarding its definition, its prognosis value and its management. In this review dedicated to emergency physicians, we choose to address tips and pitfalls they should know regarding this prevalent syndrome.

Backgound: Whether epinephrine or norepinephrine is preferable as the continuous intravenous vasopressor used to treat postresuscitation shock is unclear. Objectives: To compare outcomes of patients with postresuscitation shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to whether the continuous intravenous vasopressor used was epinephrine or norepinephrine. Methods: We conducted an observational multicenter study of consecutive patients managed in 2011-2018 for postresuscitation shock. The primary outcome was all-cause hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were cardiovascular hospital mortality and unfavorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 3 to 5). A multivariate regression analysis and a propensity score analysis were performed, as well as several sensitivity analyses. Results: Of the 766 patients included in five hospitals, 285 (37%) received epinephrine and 481 (63%) norepinephrine. All-cause hospital mortality was significantly higher in the epinephrine group (OR 2.6; 95%CI, 1.4-4.7; P =0.002). Cardiovascular hospital mortality was also higher with epinephrine (aOR 5.5; 95%CI 3.0-10.3; P P =0.02). Conclusions: Among patients with postresuscitation shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, use of epinephrine was associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular-specific mortality, compared with norepinephrine infusion. A randomized controlled trial comparing the two vasopressors in this population is warranted.

Ascitic fluid infection (AFI) is a life-threatening complication of cirrhosis. We aimed to identify early indicators of secondary peritonitis (SP), which requires emergency surgery, and to describe the outcomes of SP and spontaneous bacterial/fungal peritonitis (SBFP). Adults with cirrhosis and AFI admitted to 16 university or university-affiliated ICUs in France between 2002 and 2017 were studied retrospectively. Cases were identified by searching the hospital databases for relevant ICD-10 codes and hospital charts for AFI. Logistic multivariate regression was performed to identify factors associated with SP. Secondary outcomes were short- and long-term mortality and survivors’ functional outcomes. Of 178 included patients (137 men and 41 women; mean age, 58 ± 11 years), 21 (11.8%) had SP, confirmed by surgery in 16 cases and by abdominal computed tomography in 5 cases. Time to diagnosis exceeded 24 h in 7/21 patients with SP. By multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with SP were ascitic leukocyte count > 10,000/mm3 (OR 3.70; 95%CI 1.38–9.85; P = 0.009) and absence of laboratory signs of decompensated cirrhosis (OR 4.53; 95%CI 1.30–15.68; P = 0.017). The 1-year mortality rates in patients with SBFP and SP were 81.0% and 77.5%, respectively (Log-rank test, P = 0.92). Patients with SP vs. SBFP had no differences in 1-year functional outcomes. This multicenter retrospective study identified two indicators of SP as opposed to SBFP in patients with cirrhosis. Using these indicators may help to provide early surgical treatment.

Whether epinephrine or norepinephrine is preferable as the continuous intravenous vasopressor used to treat post-resuscitation shock is unclear. We assessed outcomes of patients with post-resuscitation shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to whether the continuous intravenous vasopressor used was epinephrine or norepinephrine.We conducted an observational multicenter study of consecutive patients managed in 2011-2018 for post-resuscitation shock. The primary outcome was all-cause hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were cardiovascular hospital mortality and unfavorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 3-5). A multivariate regression analysis and a propensity score analysis were performed, as well as several sensitivity analyses.Of the 766 patients included in five hospitals, 285 (37%) received epinephrine and 481 (63%) norepinephrine. All-cause hospital mortality was significantly higher in the epinephrine group (OR 2.6; 95%CI 1.4-4.7; P = 0.002). Cardiovascular hospital mortality was also higher with epinephrine (aOR 5.5; 95%CI 3.0-10.3; P 0.001), as was the proportion of patients with CPC of 3-5 at hospital discharge. Sensitivity analyses produced consistent results. The analysis involving adjustment on a propensity score to control for confounders showed similar findings (aOR 2.1; 95%CI 1.1-4.0; P = 0.02).Among patients with post-resuscitation shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, use of epinephrine was associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular-specific mortality, compared with norepinephrine infusion. Until additional data become available, intensivists may want to choose norepinephrine rather than epinephrine for the treatment of post-resuscitation shock after OHCA.

In-hospital cardiac arrest(IHCA) has received little attention compared with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.To address the paucity of data on IHCA patients, we examined key features, variations in mortality and predictors of death among patients admitted in French intensive care units(ICUs) from 1997 to 2015.Using the database of the Collège des Utilisateurs de Bases de données en Réanimation(CUB-Réa) that prospectively collects data from ICUs in the greater Paris area, we determined temporal trends in the incidence of IHCA, patients' outcomes, crude and Simplified Acute Physiology Score(SAPS)-II Standardized mortality and predictors of in-ICU mortality.Of the 376,325 ICU admissions, 15,324(4.08%) had IHCA, with incidence increasing from 2.78% to 3.83%(p0.001). Over time, the patient age increased by 0.7 years(p = 0.04) and SAPS-II increased by 2.3%(p0.001). Crude in-ICU mortality decreased from 78% to 62.5% over the past 18 years(p0.001). The SAPS-II-standardized mortality also decreased over time from 78.4% to 68.3%(p0.001) representing a 10.1% relative decrease from 1997 to 2015. In multivariate analysis, admission in a more recent time-period was an independent correlate of decreased mortality(OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.35-0.46).Occurrence of IHCA increased over time but remains an uncommon reason for being admitted to ICU. From 1997 to 2015, we observed a change in patient profile, with older and more critically ill patients, despite which in-ICU mortality has substantially decreased in IHCA patients, likely resulting from a global improvement in the process of care and more widespread implementation of rapid response teams.

Background Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of cancer due to long-term immunosuppression. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) showed clinical benefits but increased risk of transplant rejection. Our work aims to assess the main features of reported rejection events. Methods A disproportionality analysis of the World Health Organisation pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase, to identify drugs associated with rejection events. The estimate of this analysis is the information component for which the lower end of the 95% credibility interval (IC025) indicates significance when positive. We combined a systematic literature review of case reports to obtain additional information regarding treatment management and histopathological findings. Results A total of 96 reports of transplant rejections following ICI were included, including kidney (n = 65), liver (n = 23), cornea (n = 2) and heart (n = 5). The main indication reported for ICI was malignant melanoma (39/89, 43.8%). The time to onset between first ICI administration and rejection was 21 [interquartile range: 13; 56] days. Kidney transplant rejection was associated with nivolumab (IC025 = 1.32), pembrolizumab (IC025 = 1.17) and ipilimumab (IC025 = 0.33); while liver transplant rejection was mostly over-reported with nivolumab (IC025 = 1.95). Overall, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 were more involved than anti-CTLA-4 drugs (93.0% versus 7.0%). Subsequent mortality was 36.5% and involved liver-transplant recipients more than other organ recipients (p Conclusion ICI-associated transplant rejections were mostly reported in kidney and liver transplant recipients. Rejections were T-cell mediated with low participation of humoral response.

Idarucizumab is a humanized antigen binding fragment (Fab) of a recombinant anti-dabigatran monoclonal antibody (IgG1-kappa) that allows rapid and sustained reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation in case of bleeding or urgent surgery. Herein, we report a very unusual case of dabigatran reversal by idarucizumab in a 79-year-old woman with acute kidney failure admitted to a hospital in a context of hemoptysis. Three repeated injections were necessary because of massive dabigatran overdose and high rebounds of dabigatran plasma concentration. Idarucizumab was found on urine immunofixation up to 6 days after the last injection where it reacted with anti-kappa light chain antibody, but not with anti-gamma heavy chain antibody. Physicians should be aware of the increased half-life of idarucizumab in this context of acute kidney impairment and of its interference with urine immunofixation because it could lead to false-positive results and misdiagnosis of a paraprotein.

AIMS Few studies describe recent changes in the prevalence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock (CS) patients complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the era of widespread use of invasive strategies. The aim of the present study was to analyse trends observed in CS complicating AMI over the past 10 years, focusing on the timing of CS occurrence (i.e. primary CS, CS on admission vs. secondary CS, CS developed subsequently during hospitalization). METHODS AND RESULTS Three nationwide French registries conducted and designed to evaluate AMI management and outcomes in 'real-life' practice included consecutive AMI patients (n = 9951) admitted to intensive cardiovascular care units (ICCUs) over a 1-month period, 5 years apart. The prevalence of CS complicating AMI decreased from 2005 to 2015: 5.9%, mean age 74.1 ± 12.7 in 2005; 4.0%, mean age 73.9 ± 12.7 in 2010, 2.8%, mean age 71.1 ± 15.0 in 2015 (P

Summary Background Oxygen therapy remains a cornerstone of treatment for acute heart failure in patients with pulmonary congestion. While avoiding hypoxaemia has long been a goal of critical care practitioners, less attention has been paid to the potential hazard related to excessive hyperoxia. Aim To evaluate the impact of early hyperoxia exposure among critically ill patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit for acute heart failure. Methods In this preliminary study conducted in a Parisian intensive care unit, we assessed patients with acute heart failure admitted with pulmonary congestion and treated with oxygen therapy from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016. The hyperoxia group was defined by having at least one partial pressure of oxygen measurement > 100 mmHg on the first day following admission to the intensive care unit. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were 30-day unplanned hospital admissions, occurrence of infections and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. Results Seventy-five patients were included. Forty-three patients (57.3%) presented hyperoxia, whereas 32 patients (42.7%) did not (control group). The baseline clinical characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The primary endpoint was not statistically different between the two groups (14.0% in the hyperoxia group vs 18.8% in the control group; P = 0.85). The secondary endpoints were also not significantly different between the two groups. In the multivariable analysis, hyperoxia was not associated with increased 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.24–2.41). Conclusion In patients referred to an intensive care unit for acute heart failure, we did not find any difference in outcomes according to the presence of hyperoxia.

Refractory cardiogenic shock patients may be rescued by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). After a few days of mechanical assistance, the device can sometimes be successfully removed if the patient has partially or fully recovered from the condition that required the use of ECMO. The percentage of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock who are successfully weaned from ECMO varies from 31% to 76%. Weaning does not mean survival, because 20% to 65% of patients weaned from VA ECMO support do not survive to hospital discharge. The high death rate after successful weaning shows that many questions remain unresolved in this field. In this review, we will discuss the various factors influencing survival and a successful weaning from VA ECMO, in addition to weaning approaches proposed in the literature. Based on this information, we will propose a strategy to optimize the weaning process.

Background/Aims: Long-term mechanical assist devices are now commonly used in the treatment of severe heart failure to unload the failing ventricle, maintain sufficient end-organ perfusion and improve functional capacity. Depending on the assisted ventricles, 3 categories of long-term assist devices are available: left ventricular assist device (LVAD), biventricular assist device and total artificial heart. Improvements in technology, especially the advent of smaller, durable continuous flow pumps, have led to the use of LVADs in a much broader population of patients in the last 10 years. Both the number of patients living with LVADs and the life expectancy of these patients are increasing. Regarding this growing number of patients with LVAD, intensivists need to understand the physiology of the devices, their functioning, potential complications and their management. Methods: We performed a narrative review of relevant medical literature regarding the physiology of patients with LVAD and management of common complications relevant to the critical care physicians. Results: The most frequent complications occurring in the LVAD patients after the post-operative period are bleeding, driveline infections, thrombosis, device malfunction, right ventricular failure and arrhythmias. Bleeding is the most frequent adverse event in LVAD due to a combination of anticoagulation and acquired von Willebrand disease secondary to shear stress produced within the pump. Their management includes antiplatelet therapy arrest, reduction of the anticoagulation regimen and specific therapy if feasible. Infection is the second most common cause of death after cardiac failure in LVAD patients. All infections must be aggressively treated to avoid seeding the device. Device thrombosis can develop even when patients are adequately anticoagulated and taking antiplatelet therapy because the LVAD is responsible for a chronic hypercoagulable state. Conclusion: Management of these unique patients in the ICU is best accomplished with a multidisciplinary team that includes specialists in advanced heart failure, LVAD nurse coordinators and intensivists.