Search

Clicking is one of the most robust metaphors for social connection. But how do we know when two people "click"? We asked pairs of friends and strangers to talk with each other and rate their felt connection. For both friends and strangers, speed in response was a robust predictor of feeling connected. Conversations with faster response times felt more connected than conversations with slower response times, and within conversations, connected moments had faster response times than less-connected moments. This effect was determined primarily by partner responsivity: People felt more connected to the degree that their partner responded quickly to them rather than by how quickly they responded to their partner. The temporal scale of these effects (<250 ms) precludes conscious control, thus providing an honest signal of connection. Using a round-robin design in each of six closed networks, we show that faster responders evoked greater feelings of connection across partners. Finally, we demonstrate that this signal is used by third-party listeners as a heuristic of how well people are connected: Conversations with faster response times were perceived as more connected than the same conversations with slower response times. Together, these findings suggest that response times comprise a robust and sufficient signal of whether two minds "click.", Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interest., (Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.)

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed novel risks related to the indoor mixing of individuals from different households and challenged policymakers to adequately regulate this behaviour. While in many cases household visits are necessary for the purpose of social care, they have been linked to broadening community transmission of the virus. In this study we propose a novel, privacy-preserving framework for the measurement of household visitation at national and regional scales, making use of passively collected mobility data. We implement this approach in England from January 2020 to May 2021. The measures expose significant spatial and temporal variation in household visitation patterns, impacted by both national and regional lockdown policies, and the rollout of the vaccination programme. The findings point to complex social processes unfolding differently over space and time, likely informed by variations in policy adherence, vaccine relaxation, and regional interventions., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Learning the representation for social images has recently made remarkable achievements for many tasks, such as cross-modal retrieval and multilabel classification. However, since social images contain both multimodal contents (e.g., visual images and textual descriptions) and social relations among images, simply modeling the content information may lead to suboptimal embedding. In this paper, we propose a novel multimodal representation learning model for social images, that is, correlational multimodal variational autoencoder (CMVAE) via triplet network. Specifically, in order to mine the highly nonlinear correlation between the visual content and the textual content, a CMVAE is proposed to learn a unified representation for the multiple modalities of social images. Both common information in all modalities and private information in each modality are encoded for the representation learning. To incorporate the social relations among images, we employ the triplet network to embed multiple types of social links in the representation learning. Then, a joint embedding model is proposed to combine the social relations for representation learning of the multimodal contents. Comprehensive experiment results on four datasets confirm the effectiveness of our method in two tasks, namely, multilabel classification and cross-modal retrieval. Our method outperforms the state-of-the-art multimodal representation learning methods with significant improvement of performance.