Search

Once a patient has been diagnosed with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, treatment options have limited effectiveness. Opaganib is an oral treatment under investigation being evaluated for treatment of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2/3 trial was conducted in 57 sites worldwide from August 2020 to July 2021. Patients received either opaganib (n = 230; 500 mg twice daily) or matching placebo (n = 233) for 14 days. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients no longer requiring supplemental oxygen by day 14. Secondary outcomes included changes in the World Health Organization Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement, viral clearance, intubation, and mortality at 28 and 42 days. Pre-specified primary and secondary outcome analyses did not demonstrate statistically significant benefit (except nominally for time to viral clearance). Post-hoc analysis revealed the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO 2 ) at baseline was prognostic for opaganib treatment responsiveness and corresponded to disease severity markers. Patients with FIO 2 levels at or below the median value (≤60%) had better outcomes after opaganib treatment (n = 117) compared to placebo (n = 134). The proportion of patients with ≤60% FIO 2 at baseline that no longer required supplemental oxygen (≥24 h) by day 14 of opaganib treatment increased (76.9% vs. 63.4%; nominal p -value = 0.033). There was a 62.6% reduction in intubation/mechanical ventilation (6.84% vs. 17.91%; nominal p -value = 0.012) and a clinically meaningful 62% reduction in mortality (5.98% vs. 16.7%; nominal p -value = 0.019) by day 42. No new safety concerns were observed. While the primary analyses were not statistically significant, post-hoc analysis suggests opaganib benefit for patients with severe COVID-19 requiring supplemental oxygen with an FIO 2 of ≤60%. Further studies are warranted to prospectively confirm opaganib benefit in this subpopulation.

Studies have demonstrated that HIV infection negatively affects the immune response to hepatitis B vaccine. The present study evaluated the seroconversion to the recombinant vaccine against hepatitis B applied in HIV patients. Twenty-two patients were included in the study group all with confirmed HIV infection and with negative serum markers to hepatitis B. The control group was composed of 18 healthy individuals with negative markers for hepatitis B. All subjects were vaccinated with 20µg of ENGERIX B((R)) at 0, 1 and 6 months (3 doses). The antibody response was quantitatively assessed 1 month after the third dose of recombinant vaccine. CD4 T lymphocyte counts were also performed in those beginning vaccination. Of 22 patients in the study group, only 10 (45.5%) responded to vaccination with protective levels (over 10mIU/ml). In the control group, all of the subjects responded (p=0.005). Seventeen patients in the study group had their CD4 lymphocytes measured. The results suggested a direct relationship between the level of CD4 lymphocyte counts and response to the vaccine. The rate of response to hepatitis B recombinant vaccine with 3 doses of 20µg of HBsAg in patients infected by the human immunodeficiency virus was significantly lower than in the control group. Patients with low CD4 T lymphocyte counts are likely to have an inadequate response to the current method of hepatitis B vaccination.