Search

Background: The treatment of pincer deformity in hip arthroscopy remains controversial, with some authors advocating that over resection may risk early joint deterioration. The role of acetabular resection depth and postoperative acetabular morphology on postoperative outcomes has yet to be defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study measures the influence of acetabular resection depth and postoperative lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) on minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs), revision rates, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty using a single surgeon's prospective database. We hypothesized that patients with acetabular resections >10°, as measured by LCEA, or patients with postoperative LCEA outside the normal range of 25° to 35° would have lower PROs, higher revision rates, and higher conversion to total hip arthroplasty at midterm follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 192 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with acetabuloplasty and labral repair by a single surgeon with a minimum 5-year follow-up met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative and postoperative LCEAs were measured on supine anteroposterior radiographs, and patients were divided into cohorts based on LCEA and acetabular resection depth. Cohorts for postoperative LCEA were <20° (dysplasia), 20° to 25° (borderline dysplasia), 25° to 35° (normal), and >35° (borderline overcoverage). Cohorts for acetabular resection depth were <5°, 5° to 10°, and >10° difference from preoperative to postoperative LCEA. Outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, satisfaction scores, revision rates, and conversion to arthroplasty rates. Results: Patients significantly improved in all outcome score measures at final follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in PRO scores or conversion to total hip arthroplasty between any cohorts in the postoperative LCEA group. There were more revisions in the 25° to 35° cohort than the other cohorts (P =.02). The 5-10° resection depth cohort demonstrated a higher postoperative WOMAC score (P =.03), but otherwise no statistically significant differences were seen between resection depth cohorts in the remaining postoperative outcomes scores, revision rates, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty rates. Conclusion: Patients with postoperative LCEA values outside the normal reference range and with large resections perform similar to those with normal postoperative LCEA values and smaller resections at a minimum 5-year follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) providers are on the forefront of the prescription drug crisis and understand-ing patient's perceptions of opioids may allow physicians to better address misconceptions. The aim was to determine the perceptions of ED patients regarding the efficacy and safety of opioid analgesics., Methods: Cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of adults at a single urban academic ED. Patients completed a tablet-based survey regarding the efficacy and safety of opioid analgesics., Results: Of the 715 subjects, the sample was predominantly black (80.4 percent), female (59.2 percent), and aged 18-59 years (76.8 percent). The majority (70.1 percent) of respondents reported pain as the reason for visit. Seventy-two percent had previously taken an opioid primarily for acute pain, found them effective for pain (88.2 percent), and would be willing to do so again (62.7 percent). Adverse effects made patients less likely to use them again (OR 0.703, [0.659-0.751]). Gender and age did not affect perceptions of efficacy and safety, but certain racial groups did (OR 1.08, [1.02 to 1.14], p < 0.05). Knowing someone who used opioids in a nonmedical manner did not impact willingness to use opioids. Many (54 percent) believed opioids to be as safe as nonopioid alternatives. The majority (78 percent) consid-ered prescription opioid abuse a public health problem, however underestimated the number of annual opioid-related deaths., Conclusion: The majority of ED patients had used opioids and considered the prescription drug crisis a public health problem. Through personal use or media coverage, the majority of participants considered opioids safe, even compared to nonopioid alternatives. Better understanding these viewpoints may improve patient-physician communication about analgesic treatment.