Search

Purpose: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are used to identify drugs with potential need for dose modification in patients with renal impairment. ChatGPT holds the potential to be integrated in the electronic health record (EHR) system to give such dosing advices. In this study, we aim to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT in clinical rule-guided dose interventions in hospitalized patients with renal impairment., Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed at Tergooi Medical Center, the Netherlands. CDSS alerts regarding renal dysfunction were collected from the electronic health record (EHR) during a 2-week period and were presented to ChatGPT and an expert panel. Alerts were presented with and without patient variables. To evaluate the performance, suggested medication interventions were compared., Results: In total, 172 CDDS alerts were generated for 80 patients. Indecisive responses by ChatGPT to alerts were excluded. For alerts presented without patient variables, ChatGPT provided "correct and identical" responses to 19.9%, "correct and different" responses to 26.7%, and "incorrect responses to 53.4% of the alerts. For alerts including patient variables, ChatGPT provided "correct and identical" responses to 16.7%, "correct and different" responses to 16.0%, and "incorrect responses to 67.3% of the alerts. Accuracy was better for newer drugs such as direct oral anticoagulants., Conclusion: The performance of ChatGPT in clinical rule-guided dose interventions in hospitalized patients with renal dysfunction was poor. Based on these results, we conclude that ChatGPT, in its current state, is not appropriate for automatic integration into our EHR to handle CDSS alerts related to renal dysfunction., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is becoming an increasingly important outcome in kidney transplantation (KT). To describe HRQOL in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), this systematic review summarizes literature that compared HRQOL among KTRs and other relevant populations [i.e. patients receiving dialysis, patients on the waiting list (WL) for KT, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT), the general population (GP) and healthy controls (HCs)] and themselves before KT., Methods: The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies published between January 2000 and October 2020 were included., Results: Forty-four studies comprising 6929 KTRs were included in this systematic review. Despite the study heterogeneity, KTRs reported a higher HRQOL after KT compared with pre-transplantation and compared with patients receiving dialysis with or without being on the WL, especially in disease-specific domains (i.e. burden and effects of kidney disease). Additionally, KTRs had similar to marginally higher HRQOL compared with patients with CKD Stages 3-5 not receiving RRT. When compared with HCs or the GP, KTRs reported similar HRQOL in the first 1 or 2 years after KT and lower physical HRQOL and lower to comparable mental HRQOL in studies with longer post-transplant time., Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that HRQOL improves after KT and can be restored to but not always maintained at pre-CKD HRQOL levels. Future studies investigating intervention targets to improve or maintain post-transplant HRQOL are needed., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA.)

Graft function and patient survival are traditionally the most used parameters to assess the objective benefits of kidney transplantation. Monitoring graft function, along with therapeutic drug concentrations and transplant complications, comprises the essence of outpatient management in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, the patient's perspective is not always included in this process. Patients' perspectives on their health after kidney transplantation, albeit subjective, are increasingly acknowledged as valuable healthcare outcomes and should be considered in order to provide patient-centred healthcare. Such outcomes are known as patient-reported outcomes (PROs; e.g. health-related quality of life and symptom burden) and are captured using PRO measures (PROMs). So far, PROMs have not been routinely used in clinical care for KTRs. In this review we will introduce PROMs and their potential application and value in the field of kidney transplantation, describe commonly used PROMs in KTRs and discuss structural PROMs implementation into kidney transplantation care., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.)

Aspirin is used for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention by millions of patients on a daily basis. Previous studies suggested that aspirin intake at bedtime reduces blood pressure compared with intake on awakening. This has never been studied in patients with CVD. Moreover, platelet reactivity and CVD incidence is highest during morning hours. Bedtime aspirin intake may attenuate morning platelet reactivity. This clinical trial examined the effect of bedtime aspirin intake compared with intake on awakening on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement and morning platelet reactivity in patients using aspirin for CVD prevention. In this randomized open-label crossover trial, 290 patients were randomized to take 100 mg aspirin on awakening or at bedtime during 2 periods of 3 months. At the end of each period, 24-hour blood pressure and morning platelet reactivity were measured. The primary analysis population comprised 263 (blood pressure) and 133 (platelet reactivity) patients. Aspirin intake at bedtime did not reduce blood pressure compared with intake on awakening (difference systolic/diastolic: -0.1 [95% confidence interval, -1.0, 0.9]/-0.6 [95% confidence interval, -1.2, 0.0] mm Hg). Platelet reactivity during morning hours was reduced with bedtime aspirin intake (difference: -22 aspirin reaction units [95% confidence interval, -35, -9]). The intake of low-dose aspirin at bedtime compared with intake on awakening did not reduce blood pressure of patients with CVD. However, bedtime aspirin reduced morning platelet reactivity. Future studies are needed to assess the effect of this promising simple intervention on the excess of cardiovascular events during the high risk morning hours., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)

The risk of acute cardiovascular events is highest during morning hours, and platelet activity peaks during morning hours. The effect of timing of aspirin intake on circadian rhythm and morning peak of platelet reactivity is not known. It was our objective to evaluate the effect of timing of aspirin intake on circadian rhythm and morning peak of platelet reactivity. A randomised open-label cross-over trial in healthy subjects (n=14) was conducted. Participants used acetylsalicylic acid (80 mg) on awakening or at bedtime for two periods of two weeks, separated by a four-week wash-out period. At the end of both periods blood was drawn every 3 hours to measure COX-1-dependent (VerifyNow-Aspirin; Serum Thromboxane B2 [STxB2]) and COX-1-independent (flow cytometry surface CD62p expression; microaggregation) platelet activity. VerifyNow platelet reactivity over the whole day was similar with intake on awakening and at bedtime (mean difference: -9 [95 % confidence interval (CI) -21 to 4]). However, the morning increase in COX-1-dependent platelet activity was reduced by intake of aspirin at bedtime compared with on awakening (mean difference VerifyNow: -23 Aspirin Reaction Units [CI -50 to 4]; STxB2: -1.7 ng/ml [CI -2.7 to -0.8]). COX-1-independent assays were not affected by aspirin intake or its timing. Low-dose aspirin taken at bedtime compared with intake on awakening reduces COX-1-dependent platelet reactivity during morning hours in healthy subjects. Future clinical trials are required to investigate whether simply switching to aspirin intake at bedtime reduces the risk of cardiovascular events during the high risk morning hours.

We performed a meta-analysis of 14 genome-wide association studies of coronary artery disease (CAD) comprising 22,233 individuals with CAD (cases) and 64,762 controls of European descent followed by genotyping of top association signals in 56,682 additional individuals. This analysis identified 13 loci newly associated with CAD at P < 5 × 10⁻⁸ and confirmed the association of 10 of 12 previously reported CAD loci. The 13 new loci showed risk allele frequencies ranging from 0.13 to 0.91 and were associated with a 6% to 17% increase in the risk of CAD per allele. Notably, only three of the new loci showed significant association with traditional CAD risk factors and the majority lie in gene regions not previously implicated in the pathogenesis of CAD. Finally, five of the new CAD risk loci appear to have pleiotropic effects, showing strong association with various other human diseases or traits.

Objective: The presence of kinase-insert domain-containing receptor (KDR) on circulating CD34+ cells is assumed to be indicative for the potential of these cells to support vascular maintenance and repair. However, in bone marrow and in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood, less than 0.5% of CD34+ cells co-express KDR. Therefore, we studied whether CD34+/KDR+ cells are generated in the peripheral circulation., Methods and Results: Using an ex vivo flow model, we show that activated platelets enable CD34+ cells to home to sites of vascular injury and that upon immobilization, KDR is translocated from an endosomal compartment to the cell-surface within 15 minutes. In patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, the percentage of circulating CD34+ co-expressing KDR was significantly elevated compared to age-matched controls. When treated with aspirin, the patients showed a 49% reduction in the generation of CD34+/KDR+ cells, indicating that the level of circulating CD34+/KDR+ cells also relates to in vivo platelet activation., Conclusions: Circulating CD34+/KDR+ are not mobilized from bone marrow as a predestined endothelial progenitor cell population but are mostly generated from circulating multipotent CD34+ cells at sites of vascular injury. Therefore, the number of circulating CD34+/KDR+ cells may serve as a marker for vascular injury.

Background: Contradictory results have been published on the effects of T13254C (rs1613662), which distinguishes the two major isoforms of GP6, the gene encoding the platelet receptor glycoprotein VI, on platelet function and the risk of cardiovascular disease., Methods: We performed a population-based case-control study, the Study of Myocardial Infarctions in Leiden, among 547 male patients with a first myocardial infarction (MI) and 646 control subjects, as well as a prospective cohort study in which the same MI patients were followed for recurrent events (fatal and non-fatal MI and unstable angina) and mortality (median follow-up of 12 years). P-selectin expression by platelets induced by crosslinked collagen-related peptide (CRP-XL) was measured by whole blood flow cytometry in 274 MI patients., Results: T13254C was not associated with a first MI, but seemed to be associated with a reduced incidence of recurrent events [per-allele hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.06] and mortality (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.89). Pooling with the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study revealed hazard ratios of 0.81 (95% CI 0.66-0.99) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.55-0.96). The minor C-allele was also strongly associated with a reduced percentage of P-selectin-expressing platelets. The reduction per C-allele was 23% (95% CI 18-28%). In an independent study of 219 healthy volunteers, the per-allele reduction of CRP-XL-induced aggregation was 10% (95% CI 2-18%)., Conclusion: The minor allele of GP6 T13254C that reduced platelet activation and aggregation also seemed to be associated with a reduced incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality, but was not associated with first MI., (© 2010 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Aims: Late stent malapposition (LSM) may be acquired (LASM) or persistent. LSM may play a role in patients who develop late stent thrombosis (ST). Our objective was to compare the risk of LASM in bare metal stents (BMS) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and to investigate the possible association of both acquired and persistent LSM with (very) late ST., Methods and Results: We searched PubMed and relevant sources from January 2002 to December 2007. Inclusion criteria were: (a) intra-vascular ultrasonography (IVUS) at both post-stent implantation and follow-up; (b) 6-9-month-follow-up IVUS; (c) implantation of either BMS or the following DES: sirolimus, paclitaxel, everolimus, or zotarolimus; and (d) follow-up for LSM. Of 33 articles retrieved for detailed evaluation, 17 met the inclusion criteria. The risk of LASM in patients with DES was four times higher compared with BMS (OR = 4.36, CI 95% 1.74-10.94) in randomized clinical trials. The risk of (very) late ST in patients with LSM (five studies) was higher compared with those without LSM (OR = 6.51, CI 95% 1.34-34.91)., Conclusion: In our meta-analysis, the risk of LASM is strongly increased after DES implantation compared with BMS. Furthermore, LSM seems to be associated with late and very late ST.

Summary Background: Platelets are involved in the occlusion of coronary arteries after rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque. Furthermore, activated platelets release large quantities of growth factors, chemokines and interleukins that regulate inflammatory reactions. Therefore, we hypothesized that high basal platelet reactivity may contribute to an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in premenopausal women., Methods: We assessed the relation between high platelet reactivity and MI in a population-based case-control study among premenopausal women (aged < 50 years). We used multivariable logistic regression to quantify the effect of high platelet reactivity, adjusted for potential confounders. Platelet reactivity was estimated by plasma levels of neutrophil activating peptide 2 (NAP-2), CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)4, soluble glycoprotein 1b (sGPIb) and soluble P-selectin., Results: High platelet reactivity (i.e. levels >or= 90th percentile control subjects) was associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased incidence of MI: the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were 3.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-6.4] for NAP-2, 2.2 (0.9-5.1) for CXCL4, 1.9 (0.7-4.6) for sP-selectin and 2.5 (1.1-5.7) for sGPIb. The incidence of MI dose-dependently increased when more markers were elevated. High platelet reactivity according to both NAP-2 and sGPIb was associated with an up to tenfold increased incidence (9.9, 95% confidence interval 2.0-48.3)., Conclusions: High basal platelet reactivity was associated with a 2- to 3-fold higher incidence of MI compared with normal platelet reactivity in premenopausal women. Our results suggest that high basal platelet reactivity may contribute to a higher risk of MI.

Introduction: The Wells clinical decision rule (CDR) and D-dimer tests can be used to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). We performed a meta-analysis to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of an "unlikely" CDR (

Studies have shown that aspirin may decrease blood pressure when given at bedtime but not when administered on awakening. However, until now, a biologically plausible mechanism of this striking phenomenon was not revealed. We investigated the effect of 100 mg of aspirin administered at bedtime compared with administration on awakening on plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels over 24 hours and excretion of cortisol and catecholamines in 24-hour urine samples. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial was performed in 16 grade 1 hypertensive subjects. During 2 periods of 2 weeks separated by a 4-week washout period, participants used aspirin both at morning and at night, which was blinded with placebo. After both periods, subjects were admitted for 24 hours to measure the aforementioned parameters. Aspirin intake at bedtime compared with on awakening reduced average (24-hour) plasma renin activity by 0.08 microg/L per hour (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.13 microg/L per hour; P=0.003) without affecting aldosterone levels (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.01 nmol/L; P=0.93). Cortisol excretion in 24-hour urine was 52 nmol/24 hours (95% CI: 5 to 99 nmol/24 hours; P=0.05) lower, and dopamine and norepinephrine excretions were 0.25 micromol/24 hours (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.48 micromol/24 hours; P=0.04) and 0.22 micromol/24 hours (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.46 micromol/24 hours; P=0.02) lower in patients treated with bedtime aspirin. In conclusion, aspirin taken at bedtime compared with on awakening significantly diminished 24-hour plasma renin activity and excretion of cortisol, dopamine, and norepinephrine in 24-hour urine. Decreased activity of these pressor systems forms a biologically plausible explanation for the finding that aspirin at night may reduce blood pressure, whereas aspirin at morning does not.

Background: Statins [3-hydroxymethyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors] and antiplatelet therapy reduce the risk of atherosclerotic disease. Besides a reduction of lipid levels, statins might also have antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties, and anti-platelet therapy reduces clot formation. We have studied the risk of venous thrombosis with use of statins, other lipid-lowering medication, and antiplatelet therapy., Materials and Methods: Patients with a first episode of deep vein thrombosis in the leg or pulmonary embolism between March 1999 and September 2004 were included in a large population-based case-control study (MEGA study). Control subjects were partners of patients (53%) or recruited via a random-digit-dialing method (47%). Participants reported different all-medication use in a questionnaire., Results: Of 4538 patients, 154 used statins (3.3%), as did 354 of 5914 control subjects (5.7%). The use of statins [odds ratio (OR) 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.56] but not other lipid-lowering medications (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.62-2.43), was associated with a reduced venous thrombosis risk as compared with individuals who did not use any lipid-lowering medication, after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, atherosclerotic disease, antiplatelet therapy and use of vitamin K antagonists. Different types and various durations of statin therapy were all associated with a decreased venous thrombosis risk. Antiplatelet therapy also reduced venous thrombosis risk (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.42-0.74). However, sensitivity analyses suggested that this effect is most likely explained by a so-called 'healthy user effect'. Simultaneous use of medication most strongly reduced venous thrombosis risk., Conclusion: These results suggest that the use of various types of statins is associated with a reduced risk of venous thrombosis, whereas antiplatelet therapy and other lipid-lowering medications are not.

Aim: Low-grade inflammation plays a pivotal role in atherogenesis in type 2 diabetes. Next to its antithrombotic effects, several lines of evidence demonstrate anti-inflammatory properties of aspirin. We determined the effects of aspirin on inflammation - represented by C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) - in type 2 diabetic subjects without cardiovascular disease and assessed differential effects of aspirin 300 mg compared with 100 mg., Methods: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial was performed in 40 type 2 diabetic patients. In two periods of 6 weeks, patients used 100 or 300 mg aspirin and placebo. Plasma CRP and IL-6 levels were measured before and after both periods., Results: Use of aspirin resulted in a CRP reduction of 1.23 +/- 1.02 mg/l (mean +/- s.e.m.), whereas use of placebo resulted in a mean increase of 0.04 +/- 1.32 mg/l (P = 0.366). Aspirin reduced IL-6 with 0.7 +/- 0.5 pg/ml, whereas use of placebo resulted in a mean increase of 0.2 +/- 0.8 pg/ml (P = 0.302). There were no significant differences in effects on CRP and IL-6 between 100 and 300 mg aspirin., Conclusions: Our results indicate that a 6-week course of aspirin does not improve low-grade inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease, although a modest effect could not be excluded. No significant differential effects between aspirin 100 and 300 mg were found.

Background: Despite clopidogrel therapy, patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting are at risk of recurrent coronary events. This could be partly explained by a reduced efficacy of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet aggregation, an ex vivo defined phenomenon called clopidogrel nonresponsiveness or resistance. However, both prevalence and associated cardiovascular risks remain unclear. We systematically reviewed evidence on prevalence and clinical consequences of laboratory clopidogrel nonresponsiveness in patients undergoing PCI., Methods: Using predefined strategies, we searched electronic databases. To be included, articles should report on PCI patients treated with clopidogrel, contain a clear description of the method used to establish the effects of clopidogrel, and report the prevalence of clopidogrel nonresponsiveness or incidence of cardiovascular events. We analyzed prevalences with a linear mixed model that accounts for study covariates and we pooled odds ratios of clinical consequences with a random-effects model., Results: We identified 25 eligible studies that included a total of 3688 patients. Mean prevalence of clopidogrel nonresponsiveness was 21% (95% CI, 17%-25%) and was inversely correlated with time between clopidogrel loading and determination of nonresponsiveness and used loading dose. The pooled odds ratio of cardiovascular outcome was 8.0 (95% CI, 3.4-19.0)., Conclusions: Laboratory clopidogrel nonresponsiveness can be found in approximately 1 in 5 patients undergoing PCI. Patients ex vivo labeled nonresponsive are likely to be also "clinically nonresponsive," as they exhibit increased risks of worsened cardiovascular outcomes. Our results indicate that use of a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose will reduce these risks, which needs to be confirmed in large prospective studies.

Background: The absolute risk of recurrences among patients using aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events remains high. Persistent platelet reactivity despite aspirin therapy might explain this in part. Reported prevalences of this so-called aspirin resistance vary widely, between 0% and 57%., Objectives: The aim of the study was to systematically review all available evidence on prevalence of aspirin resistance and to study determinants of reported prevalence., Methods: Using a predefined search strategy, we searched electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. To be included in our analysis, articles had to contain a laboratory definition of aspirin resistance, use aspirin as secondary prevention, and report associated prevalence., Results: We included 34 full-text articles and 8 meeting abstracts. The mean prevalence of aspirin resistance was 24% (95% CI 20%-28%). After adjustment for differences in definition, used dosage, and population, a statistically significant higher prevalence was found in studies with aspirin dosage < or =100 mg compared with > or =300 mg (36% [95% CI 28%-43%] vs 19% [95% CI 11%-26%], P < .0001). Studies measuring platelet aggregation using light aggregometry with arachidonic acid as an agonist had a pooled unadjusted prevalence of 6% (95% CI 0%-12%). In studies using point-of-care platelet function-analyzing devices, the unadjusted prevalence was significantly higher, at 26% (95% CI 21%-31%)., Conclusions: Prevalences widely differ between studies reporting on aspirin resistance. Both aspirin dosage and the method of defining aspirin resistance strongly influence estimated prevalence, which explains found heterogeneity among studies. On average, it appears that about 1 in 4 individuals may express biochemically defined aspirin resistance.

This review summarizes available evidence on effects of aspirin on incidence and outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE). From a pathophysiological point of view, inhibition of platelet aggregation is associated with an impaired thrombus formation both in an experimental model of venous thrombosis and in vivo. Epidemiological evidence in support of a beneficial effect of acetylsalicylic acid on VTE incidence is provided by the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis of studies on the use of antiplatelet agents in cardiovascular risk reduction, showing a significant 25% risk reduction of pulmonary embolism. Moreover, a meta-analysis on older trials of antiplatelet agents in postsurgical VTE prevention and the large Pulmonary Embolism Prevention trial demonstrate a protective effect of the same magnitude: 25-30%. However, as low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have shown a superior efficacy and safety profile, and no direct comparisons have been made between aspirin, LMWH and VKA in prolonged use, the most recent guidelines advise against aspirin monotherapy for thromboprophylaxis in the surgical patient. Currently, there is no evidence to support a role for aspirin in air travel-related VTE. Regarding prevention of recurrent VTE, studies are ongoing to determine the potential role of aspirin after a first unprovoked VTE.