9 results on '"Smith, Erica E."'
Search Results
2. COVID-19 Among Workers in Meat and Poultry Processing Facilities — 19 States, April 2020
- Author
-
Dyal, Jonathan W., Grant, Michael P., Broadwater, Kendra, Bjork, Adam, Waltenburg, Michelle A., Gibbins, John D., Hale, Christa, Silver, Maggie, Fischer, Marc, Steinberg, Jonathan, Basler, Colin A., Jacobs, Jesica R., Kennedy, Erin D., Tomasi, Suzanne, Trout, Douglas, Hornsby-Myers, Jennifer, Oussayef, Nadia L., Delaney, Lisa J., Patel, Ketki, Shetty, Varun, Kline, Kelly E., Schroeder, Betsy, Herlihy, Rachel K., House, Jennifer, Jervis, Rachel, Clayton, Joshua L., Ortbahn, Dustin, Austin, Connie, Berl, Erica, Moore, Zack, Buss, Bryan F., Stover, Derry, Westergaard, Ryan, Pray, Ian, DeBolt, Meghan, Person, Amy, Gabel, Julie, Kittle, Theresa S., Hendren, Pamela, Rhea, Charles, Holsinger, Caroline, Dunn, John, Turabelidze, George, Ahmed, Farah S., deFijter, Siestke, Pedati, Caitlin S., Rattay, Karyl, Smith, Erica E., Luna-Pinto, Carolina, Cooley, Laura A., Saydah, Sharon, Preacely, Nykiconia D., Maddox, Ryan A., Lundeen, Elizabeth, Goodwin, Bradley, Karpathy, Sandor E., Griffing, Sean, Jenkins, Mary M., Lowry, Garry, Schwarz, Rachel D., Yoder, Jonathan, Peacock, Georgina, Walke, Henry T., Rose, Dale A., and Honein, Margaret A.
- Published
- 2020
3. Immunity games: how the State Department has provided courts with a post-Samantar framework for determining foreign official immunity.
- Author
-
Smith, Erica E.
- Subjects
Sovereign immunity -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Yousuf v. Samantar (130 S. Ct. 2278 (2010)) ,United States. Department of State -- Standards ,Government regulation ,Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 - Abstract
I. OPENING PLAY: INTRODUCTION II. LAYING THE BOARD: A QUICK PRIMER OF FOREIGN OFFICIAL IMMUNITY A. Status-Based Versus Conduct-Based Immunity B. Foreign Sovereign Immunity Doctrine in the United States III. [...]
- Published
- 2014
4. Declines in SARS-CoV-2 Transmission, Hospitalizations, and Mortality After Implementation of Mitigation Measures--Delaware, March-June 2020
- Author
-
Kanu, Florence A., Smith, Erica E., Offutt-Powell, Tabatha, Hong, Rick, Dinh, Thu-Ha, and Pevzner, Eric
- Subjects
Quarantine -- Health aspects ,Mortality -- Delaware ,Disease transmission -- Health aspects ,Coronaviruses -- Health aspects ,Home shopping -- Health aspects ,Stay-at-home orders (Public safety) -- Health aspects ,COVID-19 -- Health aspects ,Contact tracing -- Health aspects ,Health - Abstract
On November 6, 2020, this report was posted as an MMWR Early Release on the MMWR website (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr). Mitigation measures, including stay-at-home orders and public mask wearing, together with routine [...]
- Published
- 2020
5. Outbreak of influenza A (H3N2) variant virus infection among attendees of an agricultural fair, Pennsylvania, USA, 2011
- Author
-
Wong, Karen K., Greenbaum, Adena, Moll, Maria E., Lando, James, Moore, Erin L., Ganatra, Rahul, Biggerstaff, Matthew, Lam, Eugene, Smith, Erica E., Storms, Aaron D., Miller, Jeffrey R., Dato, Virginia, Nalluswami, Kumar, Nambiar, Atmaram, Silvestri, Sharon A., Lute, James R., Ostroff, Stephen, Hancock, Kathy, Branch, Alicia, Trock, Susan C., Klimov, Alexander, Shu, Bo, Brammer, Lynnette, Epperson, Scott, Finelli, Lyn, and Jhung, Michael A.
- Subjects
Pennsylvania. Department of Agriculture ,United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ,Epidemics -- Development and progression -- Pennsylvania ,Agricultural industry ,Swine influenza -- Development and progression ,Influenza viruses ,Infection -- Development and progression ,Disease transmission -- Development and progression ,Agricultural societies ,Health - Abstract
Triple reassortant swine influenza A viruses have circulated in swine herds in North America since 1998 (1-3). On the rare occasions that these viruses infect humans, they are called influenza [...]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Social determinants of health as upstream risk factors for Salmonella and Campylobacter infections in Pennsylvania
- Author
-
Smith, Erica E.
- Subjects
Public health ,Intestines--Infections ,Epidemiology ,Campylobacter infections ,Salmonella infections ,Rural health ,Food security ,Poverty - Abstract
Background: Non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. are major bacterial causes of acute gastroenteritis, typically characterized by diarrhea, abdominal cramps, fever, and nausea/vomiting. These conditions cause an estimated 1,000,000 and 850,000 illnesses annually in the United States, respectively. In Pennsylvania, these are the most commonly reported enteric bacterial infections, with an average of approximately 1,600 Salmonella and 1,800 Campylobacter cases reported annually statewide during 2011-2015. We hypothesize that social determinants of health such as residence in rural areas (rurality) or food deserts, or socioeconomic position (SEP) may be upstream risk factors for bacterial enteric illness, particularly among the vast majority which are non-outbreak associated, "sporadic" cases. These social determinants influence where we live, where we are able to shop and eat, and what foods we buy, which all impact our risk of foodborne or enteric illness, but have not yet been characterized in the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate food, water and animal exposures and disease rates by rurality, food desert residence and SEP (measured by race/ethnicity, poverty and educational attainment). Study Population and Methods: The study population included sporadic, domestically acquired non-Typhoidal salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis cases reported in Pennsylvania during 2011-2016. Food, water and animal exposures reported by case-patients during public health investigation and census tract disease rates were compared by rurality (paper 1), food desert residence (paper 2), and race/ethnicity, poverty, and educational attainment (paper 3). Results: Salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis rates were higher in rural census tracts than urban census tracts. Food exposures such as meat, poultry, seafood and eggs were more common among urban cases than rural cases, while exposures such as unpasteurized milk, well water and animal contact were more common among rural cases than urban cases. Rates of both conditions were lower in food deserts. Case-patients residing in food deserts were more likely to report eating restaurant meals and fresh produce, and less likely to report consuming meat, poultry, seafood, eggs or unpasteurized dairy/juice than case-patients residing outside of food deserts. Residents of lower SEP tracts more frequently reported meat, poultry, seafood or eggs, and less frequently reported produce, restaurant meals, well water, recreational water, or animal exposures. Salmonellosis rates were higher and campylobacteriosis rates were lower in lower SEP census tracts. Public Health Implications: Public Health Implications Public health programs to reduce bacterial enteric diseases such as Salmonella and Campylobacter should be tailored for communities. In urban areas, programs should focus on reducing contamination of food sources such as poultry and eggs, and on food safety practices to reduce cross contamination from these sources in restaurant and home kitchens. In rural areas, programs should focus on reducing consumption of unpasteurized milk, on testing and treating well water for pathogens, and on appropriate hygiene after contact with animals. Although evidence suggests a high potential contamination risk of foods sold in small markets, safe food handling in the home or differential under-reporting of disease may be contributing to lower disease rates in food deserts. Access to fresh food is critical to health equity, but these foods may increase foodborne disease risk. Regulatory authorities should work to mitigate foodborne disease risk in food deserts. Programs to increase fresh produce access should consider including food safety education for proprietors and customers. Enteric disease control programs in lower SEP areas should focus on reducing structural barriers to food access and improving microbial food quality. In higher SEP areas, they should focus on mitigating well water and animal exposure.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Social determinants of health as upstream risk factors for Salmonella and Campylobacter infections in Pennsylvania
- Author
-
Smith, Erica E., additional
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Declines in SARS-CoV-2 Transmission, Hospitalizations, and Mortality After Implementation of Mitigation Measures- Delaware, March-June 2020.
- Author
-
Kanu FA, Smith EE, Offutt-Powell T, Hong R, Dinh TH, and Pevzner E
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, COVID-19, Contact Tracing, Coronavirus Infections mortality, Coronavirus Infections therapy, Coronavirus Infections transmission, Delaware epidemiology, Female, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Humans, Male, Masks statistics & numerical data, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral mortality, Pneumonia, Viral therapy, Pneumonia, Viral transmission, Quarantine legislation & jurisprudence, Young Adult, Coronavirus Infections prevention & control, Pandemics prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral prevention & control, Public Health legislation & jurisprudence
- Abstract
Mitigation measures, including stay-at-home orders and public mask wearing, together with routine public health interventions such as case investigation with contact tracing and immediate self-quarantine after exposure, are recommended to prevent and control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (1-3). On March 11, the first COVID-19 case in Delaware was reported to the Delaware Division of Public Health (DPH). The state responded to ongoing community transmission with investigation of all identified cases (commencing March 11), issuance of statewide stay-at-home orders (March 24-June 1), a statewide public mask mandate (from April 28), and contact tracing (starting May 12). The relationship among implementation of mitigation strategies, case investigations, and contact tracing and COVID-19 incidence and associated hospitalization and mortality was examined during March-June 2020. Incidence declined by 82%, hospitalization by 88%, and mortality by 100% from late April to June 2020, as the mask mandate and contact tracing were added to case investigations and the stay-at-home order. Among 9,762 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases reported during March 11-June 25, 2020, two thirds (6,527; 67%) of patients were interviewed, and 5,823 (60%) reported completing isolation. Among 2,834 contacts reported, 882 (31%) were interviewed and among these contacts, 721 (82%) reported completing quarantine. Implementation of mitigation measures, including mandated mask use coupled with public health interventions, was followed by reductions in COVID-19 incidence and associated hospitalizations and mortality. The combination of state-mandated community mitigation efforts and routine public health interventions can reduce the occurrence of new COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. COVID-19 Among Workers in Meat and Poultry Processing Facilities - 19 States, April 2020.
- Author
-
Dyal JW, Grant MP, Broadwater K, Bjork A, Waltenburg MA, Gibbins JD, Hale C, Silver M, Fischer M, Steinberg J, Basler CA, Jacobs JR, Kennedy ED, Tomasi S, Trout D, Hornsby-Myers J, Oussayef NL, Delaney LJ, Patel K, Shetty V, Kline KE, Schroeder B, Herlihy RK, House J, Jervis R, Clayton JL, Ortbahn D, Austin C, Berl E, Moore Z, Buss BF, Stover D, Westergaard R, Pray I, DeBolt M, Person A, Gabel J, Kittle TS, Hendren P, Rhea C, Holsinger C, Dunn J, Turabelidze G, Ahmed FS, deFijter S, Pedati CS, Rattay K, Smith EE, Luna-Pinto C, Cooley LA, Saydah S, Preacely ND, Maddox RA, Lundeen E, Goodwin B, Karpathy SE, Griffing S, Jenkins MM, Lowry G, Schwarz RD, Yoder J, Peacock G, Walke HT, Rose DA, and Honein MA
- Subjects
- Animals, COVID-19, Coronavirus Infections prevention & control, Humans, Meat, Occupational Diseases prevention & control, Pandemics prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral prevention & control, Poultry, United States epidemiology, Coronavirus Infections epidemiology, Coronavirus Infections transmission, Disease Outbreaks prevention & control, Food-Processing Industry, Occupational Diseases epidemiology, Pneumonia, Viral epidemiology, Pneumonia, Viral transmission
- Abstract
Congregate work and residential locations are at increased risk for infectious disease transmission including respiratory illness outbreaks. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is primarily spread person to person through respiratory droplets. Nationwide, the meat and poultry processing industry, an essential component of the U.S. food infrastructure, employs approximately 500,000 persons, many of whom work in proximity to other workers (1). Because of reports of initial cases of COVID-19, in some meat processing facilities, states were asked to provide aggregated data concerning the number of meat and poultry processing facilities affected by COVID-19 and the number of workers with COVID-19 in these facilities, including COVID-19-related deaths. Qualitative data gathered by CDC during on-site and remote assessments were analyzed and summarized. During April 9-27, aggregate data on COVID-19 cases among 115 meat or poultry processing facilities in 19 states were reported to CDC. Among these facilities, COVID-19 was diagnosed in 4,913 (approximately 3%) workers, and 20 COVID-19-related deaths were reported. Facility barriers to effective prevention and control of COVID-19 included difficulty distancing workers at least 6 feet (2 meters) from one another (2) and in implementing COVID-19-specific disinfection guidelines.* Among workers, socioeconomic challenges might contribute to working while feeling ill, particularly if there are management practices such as bonuses that incentivize attendance. Methods to decrease transmission within the facility include worker symptom screening programs, policies to discourage working while experiencing symptoms compatible with COVID-19, and social distancing by workers. Source control measures (e.g., the use of cloth face covers) as well as increased disinfection of high-touch surfaces are also important means of preventing SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Mitigation efforts to reduce transmission in the community should also be considered. Many of these measures might also reduce asymptomatic and presymptomatic transmission (3). Implementation of these public health strategies will help protect workers from COVID-19 in this industry and assist in preserving the critical meat and poultry production infrastructure (4)., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.