Search

Anna M Wahl,1 Daniel Bidstrup,1 Isabel G Smidt-Nielsen,1 Mads U Werner,2 Ole Hyldegaard,1,3 Per Rotbøll-Nielsen21Hyperbaric Unit, Department of Anesthesia, Head and Orthopedic Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Neuroscience Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkPurpose: Animal studies have demonstrated anti-inflammatory, and anti-nociceptive properties of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). However, physiological data are scarce in humans. In a recent experimental study, the authors used the burn injury (BI) model observing a decrease in secondary hyperalgesia areas (SHA) in the HBOT-group compared to a control-group. Surprisingly, a long-lasting neuroplasticity effect mitigating the BI-induced SHA-response was seen in the HBOT-preconditioned group. The objective of the present study, therefore, was to confirm our previous findings using an examiner-blinded, block-randomized, controlled, crossover study design.Patients and methods: Nineteen healthy subjects attended two BI-sessions with an inter-session interval of ≥28 days. The BIs were induced on the lower legs by a contact thermode (12.5 cm,2 47C°, 420 s). The subjects were block-randomized to receive HBOT (2.4 ATA, 100% O2, 90 min) or ambient conditions ([AC]; 1 ATA, 21% O2), dividing cohorts equally into two sequence allocations: HBOT-AC or AC-HBOT. All sensory assessments performed during baseline, BI, and post-intervention phases were at homologous time points irrespective of sequence allocation. The primary outcome was SHA, comparing interventions and sequence allocations.Results: Data are mean (95% CI). During HBOT-sessions a mitigating effect on SHA was demonstrated compared to AC-sessions, ie, 18.8 (10.5–27.0) cm2 vs 32.0 (20.1–43.9) cm2 (P=0.021), respectively. In subjects allocated to the sequence AC-HBOT a significantly larger mean difference in SHA in the AC-session vs the HBOT-session was seen 25.0 (5.4–44.7) cm2 (P=0.019). In subjects allocated to the reverse sequence, HBOT-AC, no difference in SHA between sessions was observed (P=0.55), confirming a preconditioning, long-lasting (≥28 days) effect of HBOT.Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that a single HBOT-session compared to control is associated with both acute and long-lasting mitigating effects on BI-induced SHA, confirming central anti-inflammatory, neuroplasticity effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy.Keywords: burns, hyperbaric oxygenation, inflammation, pathophysiology, secondary hyperalgesia

Purpose: While early treatment of posterior uveal melanoma can save the eye, the effect of early treatment on survival remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether the tumour size at diagnosis has changed over time, and if this has affected survival rates of patients with posterior uveal melanoma in Denmark., Methods: Nationwide retrospective cohort study linking data from registry-based resources to data from clinical charts and pathology records. Including all Danish patients diagnosed with posterior uveal melanoma from 1943 to 2017. Incidence rates were estimated as annual percentage change (APC) overall and by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumour sizes. The age-period-cohort model was applied to estimate the relative risk of calendar period. The cox proportional hazards model, relative survival Kaplan-Meier curves and cumulative incidence curves were applied to estimate the effect of calendar period on survival., Results: An overall increase in incidence rate of uveal melanoma was found (APC = 0.25%, 0.08-0.42; 95% CI). This was due to increasing incidence rate of AJCC T1 + T2 tumours (APC = 0.97%, 0.57-1.37; 95% CI), whereas no increase in incidence rates of AJCC T3 + T4 tumours was found (APC = -0.01%, -0.26 to 0.25; 95% CI). The disease-specific survival improved with calendar period for all tumour sizes (HR = 0.988; 0.984-0.993; 95% CI)., Conclusion: Increasing incidence rate and improved survival rate for uveal melanoma was found concordantly with a decrease in tumour size during a 70-year period., (© 2021 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Purpose: Biopsy of posterior uveal melanoma continues to be intensely debated in terms of the clinical benefits and safety profile. Although several studies have reported a low frequency of ocular complications after tumor biopsy, the potential long-term risk of iatrogenic dissemination remains unresolved. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of metastatic disease after biopsy of posterior uveal melanoma., Design: Retrospective nationwide cohort study linking clinical and histopathologic records to pathology, cancer, and mortality registries., Participants: All patients with posterior uveal melanoma treated in Denmark between January 1985 and December 2016., Methods: For each patient, we recorded detailed information on age, gender, tumor characteristics, and diagnostic and therapeutic measures, including tumor biopsy, if any, and the primary treating hospital. Absolute risk of melanoma-specific death was presented by cumulative incidence curves that accounted for competing risks. Cox regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause and melanoma-specific mortality of patients who underwent biopsy during primary treatment compared with nonbiopsied patients through November 1, 2017. Fine and Gray risk regression was used as a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of competing risks., Main Outcome Measures: All-cause and melanoma-specific mortality., Results: Among 1637 patients, 567 (35%) underwent biopsy during primary treatment. At diagnosis, biopsied patients exhibited better prognostic characteristics, including smaller tumor size (P < 0.001) and younger age (P < 0.001), than nonbiopsied patients. In the adjusted analyses, we observed no apparent differences in all-cause mortality (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.89-1.26; P = 0.47) or melanoma-specific mortality (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.89-1.39; P = 0.35) among biopsied patients compared with nonbiopsied patients., Conclusions: All-cause and melanoma-specific mortality after primary treatment were similar among biopsied and nonbiopsied patients with posterior uveal melanoma. Our findings do not support an increased metastatic risk after intraocular tumor biopsy., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)