Search

The most significant and well characterized genetic risk factors for breast and/or ovarian cancer are germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations strikingly increase breast cancer risk, suggesting that polymorphisms in these genes are logical candidates in seeking to identify low penetrance susceptibility alleles. The aim of this study was to initiate a screen for BRCA1/2 gene mutations in order to identify the genetic variants in the Republic of Macedonia, and to evaluate the association of several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes with breast cancer risk. In this study, we included 100 patients with invasive breast cancer from the Republic of Macedonia, classified according to their family history and 100 controls. The methodology included direct sequencing, single nucleotide primer extension method and multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA) analysis, all followed by capillary electrophoresis (CE) on an ABI PRISM™ 3130 Genetic Analyzer. We identified a total of seven carriers of mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes. None of the tested polymorphisms was associated with sporadic breast cancer risk, however, polymorphism rs8176267 in BRCA1 and N372H in BRCA2 showed an association with breast cancer risk in patients with at least one family member with breast cancer.

Background: The expression of Bcl-2 oncoprotein is associated with inhibition of apoptosis and prolonged cell survival. The purpose of this study was to investigate Bcl-2 protein expression in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in order to see if it was related to clinicopathological features and to prognosis. Materials and methods." Forty patients with SCLC were stained immunohistochemically using specific monoclonal antibody (DAKO-Bcl-2, 124). Bcl-2 positivity was determined as detection of the oncoprotein in greater than 10% of neoplastic cells. Results." Immunopositivity was present in 26 (60%) of SCLC patients. Twenty-three of 40 (57.5%) patients had limited disease at presentation, and 17 of 40 (42.5%) had extensive disease. There was not any correlation with Bcl-2 protein expression and clinicopathological parameters such as sex, age, smoking history and performance status. According to the extent of the disease, Bcl-2 expression was significantly higher in patients with extensive disease (p < 0.009). Bcl-2 expression was associated with significant shorter survival in patients with SCLC (Log Rank = -5.26; p = 0.00001). Cox regression analysis controlling for age, sex and tumor stage, confirmed that Bcl-2 expression (HR = 0.049 p < 0.0001) and N stage (HR = 0.152 p < 0.012) were an independent prognostic markers for poor prognosis. In conclusion Bcl-2 oncoprotein was expressed in most cases of SCLC and its expression may have prognostic importance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: LUCAS is a clinical lung cancer registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT04228237), prospectively collecting data from newly diagnosed lung cancer patients in seven pneumooncology centers in the Czech Republic, since June 1, 2018. The aim of the study was to assess the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis, percentage of morphological types, survival, percentage of driving mutations, eligibility for radical surgery, and percentage of patients who undergo radical surgery, in the non-smoking population in comparison with smokers and former smokers., Patients and Methods: The total number of patients in the registry at the time of the analysis was 2,743. Only 2,439 patients with complete records (smoking status, stage, and type of tumor) were included in this study., Results: The analysis indicated that non-smokers are diagnosed at a later stage of the disease but they have a better survival rate than smokers. Fewer smokers with stage III disease who are eligible for radical surgery will undergo surgery compared to non-smokers with the same clinical stage. Driving mutations are more common in non-smokers, even after adjustment for the more frequent occurrence of adenocarcinoma in the group of non-smokers., Conclusion: The data from LUCAS registry are consistent with already known facts, suggesting that the LUCAS registry is a useful clinical tool., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)