Search

01 april 2023, Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and ARC prevalence estimates are based on estimation of GFR (eGFR) using serum creatinine (SCr), which is known to be inaccurate. We aimed to test our hypothesis that AKI prevalence will be higher and ARC prevalence will be lower in critically ill children when using iohexol-based measured GFR (mGFR), rather than using eGFR. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the performance of different SCr-based eGFR methods. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, critically ill term-born neonates and children were included. mGFR was calculated using a plasma disappearance curve after parenteral administration of iohexol. AKI diagnosis was based on the KDIGO criteria, SCr-based eGFR, and creatinine clearance (CrCL). Differences between eGFR and mGFR were determined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and by calculating bias and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within 30% of mGFR values). RESULTS: One hundred five children, including 43 neonates, were included. AKI prevalence was higher based on mGFR (48%), than with KDIGO or eGFR (11-40%). ARC prevalence was lower with mGFR (24%) compared to eGFR (38-51%). eGFR equations significantly overestimated mGFR (60-71 versus 41 ml/min/1.73 m(2), p < 0.001-0.002). Accuracy was highest with eGFR equations based on age- and sex-dependent equations (up to 59%). CONCLUSION: Iohexol-based AKI prevalence was higher and ARC prevalence lower compared to standard SCr-based eGFR methods. Age- and sex-dependent equations for eGFR (eGFR-Smeets for neonates and eGFR-Pierce for children) best approached measured GFR and should preferably be used to optimize diagnosis of AKI and ARC in this population. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Radboud University, 07 maart 2023, Promotores : Wildt, S.N. de, Schreuder, M.F., Contains fulltext : 289579.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)

Item does not contain fulltext, AIMS: Pregnant women are hypothesized to have low adherence to prescribed medication, because of concerns about harmful effects on the unborn child. However, very little is known about the actual adherence to prescribed medication during pregnancy. We determined to what extent women follow treatment recommendations regarding prescribed medication use in mid-pregnancy. METHODS: Dutch women participating in the PRIDE Study completed a 6-week diary on medication use. Additionally, pharmacy records were obtained. For each medication dispensed, we determined 3 measures of adherence: (i) whether use was reported in the diary (actual use); (ii) difference between dispensing date and date of first reported use (initiation time); and (iii) proportion of days with at least the correct number of doses taken (implementation adherence). RESULTS: During the 6-week study period, 235 of 816 women (29%) were dispensed medication. Actual use was highest for medications used for chronic conditions (88%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 81-93), followed by medication for pregnancy-related conditions (79%; 95% CI 71-86) and medication for occasional and short-time use (69%; 95% CI 60-77). We observed a ≥1-day delay in treatment initiation for 42% of medications dispensed for the first time in the study period. Mean implementation adherence was 74.2% (95% CI 69.3-79.2) for medications that were actually used. CONCLUSION: Although actual use of medications dispensed was high, many pregnant women did not adhere to treatment recommendations. This nonadherence may impact maternal and child health and lead to overestimation of medication use in studies in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology relying on administrative databases.

01 september 2023, Contains fulltext : 295967.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), INTRODUCTION: Off-label drug use in the paediatric population is common, and the lack of high-quality efficacy studies poses patients at risk for failing pharmacotherapy. Next to efficacy studies, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are increasingly used to inform paediatric dose selection. As resources for paediatric trials are limited, we aimed to summarize existing PK and efficacy studies to identify knowledge gaps in available evidence supporting paediatric dosing recommendations, thereby taking paediatric cardiovascular drugs as proof of concept. METHODS: For each cardiovascular drug, paediatric indication and prespecified age group, together comprising one record, the authorized state was assessed. Next, for off-label records, the highest level of evidence was scored. High-quality efficacy studies were defined as meta-analysis or randomized controlled trials. Other comparative research, noncomparative research or consensus-based expert opinions were considered low quality. The level of evidence for PK studies was scored per drug and per age group, but regardless of indication. RESULTS: A total of 58 drugs included 417 records, of which 279 (67%) were off-label. Of all off-label records, the majority (81%) were not supported by high-quality efficacy studies, but for 140 of these records (62%) high-quality PK studies were available. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that for the majority of off-label cardiovascular drugs, only low-quality efficacy studies were available. However, high-quality PK studies were frequently available. Combining these PK data with extrapolation of efficacy data from adults may help to close the current information gap and prioritize the drugs for which clinical studies and safety data are urgently needed.

01 augustus 2023, Item does not contain fulltext

Contains fulltext : 299857.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Periconceptional use of oral contraceptives (OCs) has been reported to increase risks of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes, but risks are suggested to differ depending on the timing of discontinuation, amount of oestrogen and progestin content. METHODS: Prospective cohort study among 6470 pregnancies included in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study in 2012-19. Exposure was defined as any reported use of OCs within 12 months pre-pregnancy or after conception. Outcomes of interest were gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, pre-term birth, low birthweight and small for gestational age (SGA). Multivariable Poisson regression using stabilized inverse probability weighting estimated relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Any periconceptional OC use was associated with increased risks of pre-eclampsia (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.99-1.93), pre-term birth (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09-1.75) and low birthweight (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.92), but not with gestational hypertension (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.31), gestational diabetes (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77-1.36) and SGA (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.75-1.21). Associations with pre-eclampsia were strongest for discontinuation 0-3 months pre-pregnancy, for OCs containing ≥30 µg oestrogen and for first- or second-generation OCs. Pre-term birth and low birthweight were more likely to occur when OCs were discontinued 0-3 months pre-pregnancy, when using OCs containing <30 µg oestrogen and when using third-generation OCs. Associations with SGA were observed for OCs containing <30 µg oestrogen and for third- or fourth-generation OCs. CONCLUSIONS: Periconceptional OC use, particularly those containing oestrogen, was associated with increased risks of pre-eclampsia, pre-term birth, low birthweight and SGA.

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: The evidence from individual studies to support the maturational pattern of GFR in healthy, term-born neonates is inconclusive. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of reported measured GFR (mGFR) data, aiming to establish neonatal GFR reference values. Furthermore, we aimed to optimize neonatal creatinine-based GFR estimations. METHODS: We identified studies reporting mGFR measured by exogenous markers or creatinine clearance (CrCL) in healthy, term-born neonates. The relationship between postnatal age and clearance was investigated using cubic splines with generalized additive linear mixed models. From our reference values, we estimated an updated coefficient for the Schwartz equation (eGFR [ml/min per 1.73 m(2)]=(k×height [cm])/serum creatinine [mg/dl]). RESULTS: Forty-eight out of 1521 screened articles reported mGFR in healthy, term-born neonates, and 978 mGFR values from 881 neonates were analyzed. IPD were available for 367 neonates, and the other 514 neonates were represented by 41 aggregated data points as means/medians per group. GFR doubled in the first 5 days after birth, from 19.6 (95% CI, 14.7 to 24.6) to 40.6 (95% CI, 36.7 to 44.5) ml/min per 1.73 m(2), and then increased more gradually to 59.4 (95% CI, 45.9 to 72.9) ml/min per 1.73 m(2) by 4 weeks of age. A coefficient of 0.31 to estimate GFR best fitted the data. CONCLUSIONS: These reference values for healthy, term-born neonates show a biphasic increase in GFR, with the largest increase between days 1 and 5. Together with the re-examined Schwartz equation, this can help identify altered GFR in term-born neonates. To enable widespread implementation of our proposed eGFR equation, validation in a large cohort of neonates is required. PURPOSE: The number of patients ≥ 80 years admitted into critical care is increasing. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) added another challenge for clinical decisions for both admission and limitation of life-sustaining treatments

Contains fulltext : 283062.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext, Many drugs are still prescribed off-label to the pediatric population. Although off-label drug use not supported by high level of evidence is potentially harmful, a comprehensive overview of the quality of the evidence pertaining off-label drug use in children is lacking. The Dutch Pediatric Formulary (DPF) provides best evidence-based dosing guidelines for drugs used in children. For each drug-indication-age group combination-together compiling one record-we scored the highest available level of evidence: labeled use, systematic review or meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparative research, noncomparative research, or consensus-based expert opinions. For records based on selected guidelines, the original sources were not reviewed. These records were scored as guideline. A total of 774 drugs were analyzed comprising a total of 6,426 records. Of all off-label records (n = 2,718), 14% were supported by high quality evidence (4% meta-analysis or systematic reviews, 10% RCTs of high quality), 20% by comparative research, 14% by noncomparative research, 37% by consensus-based expert opinions, and 15% by selected guidelines. Fifty-eight percent of all records were authorized, increasing with age from 30% in preterm neonates (n = 110) up to 64% in adolescents (n = 1,630). Many have advocated that off-label use is only justified when supported by a high level of evidence. We show that this prerequisite would seriously limit available drug treatment for children as the underlying evidence is low across ages and drug classes. Our data identify the drugs and therapeutic areas for which evidence is clearly missing and could drive the global research agenda.

Contains fulltext : 233875.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Contains fulltext : 225313.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Enalapril is often used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Clinical data suggest that the urinary excretion of enalaprilat, the active metabolite of enalapril, is mediated by renal transporters. We aimed to identify enalaprilat specificity for renal proximal tubular transporters. METHODS: Baculovirus-transduced HEK293 cells overexpressing proximal tubular transporters were used to study enalaprilat cellular uptake. Uptake into cells overexpressing the basolateral transporters OCT2, OAT1, OAT2, or OAT3 and apical transporters OAT4, PEPT1, PEPT2, OCTN1, OCTN2, MATE1, MATE2k, and URAT1 was compared with mock-transduced control cells. Transport by renal efflux transporters MRP2, MPR4, P-gp, and BCRP was tested using a vesicular assay. Enalaprilat concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS. RESULTS: Uptake of enalaprilat into cells expressing OAT3 as well as OAT4 was significantly higher compared to control cells. The enalaprilat affinity for OAT3 was 640 (95% CI: 520-770) µM. For OAT4, no reliable affinity constant could be determined using concentrations up to 3 mM. No transport was observed for other transporters. CONCLUSION: The affinity of enalaprilat for OAT3 and OAT4 was notably low compared to other substrates. Taking this affinity and clinically relevant plasma concentrations of enalaprilat and other OAT3 substrates into account, we believe that drug-drug interactions on a transporter level do not have a therapeutic consequence and will not require dose adjustments of enalaprilat itself or other OAT3 substrates.