5 results on '"Sludden, John"'
Search Results
2. A Brief Review of PSAP's Position Paper 'One City, Two Systems of Schools'
- Author
-
Research for Action, Westmaas, Lucas, and Sludden, John
- Abstract
A position paper released on December 5, 2014 by the Philadelphia School Advocacy Partners (PSAP), the advocacy arm of the Philadelphia School Partnership (PSP), calls for an "aggressive expansion of schools that are achieving results for low-income and minority students" (p. 2). The document describes what it terms "high-impact" schools and "underperforming" schools. The author(s) states: "For poor and minority students in Philadelphia, there really are two kinds of schools: those that work and those that don't...variation in outcomes is not dependent on school type, student income levels, or other out-of-school factors (p. 2)." Research for Action (RFA) found a number of issues with the claims made by PSAP. Specifically: (1) PSAP argued that the populations served by the two groups of schools are essentially identical, but omits discussion of several important differences between the groups--primarily in the special education population and in the grade levels served; (2) PSAP made questionable decisions about which schools to include in their "underperforming" sample and failed to detail their rationale for doing so; and (3) RFA was not able to reconstruct PSAP's calculations of the percentage of students who are eligible for free lunch. This document argues that the data presented by PSAP are not nearly sufficient to support their sweeping conclusions.
- Published
- 2014
3. Governor Corbett's Expanding Excellence Program: A Research for Action Policy Note
- Author
-
Research for Action, Sludden, John, Beaver, Jessica, Park, Elizabeth, Kumar, Anurag, and Gao, Jian
- Abstract
According to a Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) press release, in which the Governor outlined his budget priorities for 2014-2015, the Governor's plan includes the Expanding Excellence Program. If enacted and funded, this initiative would "provide competitive funding to schools that have attained a 90 or higher on the School Performance Profile and are willing to analyze and share best practices that have proven to raise student achievement. Grant recipients will be responsible for supporting schools across the state that strive to replicate these strategies and techniques."In his budget address, Governor Corbett argued that the proposal will help struggling schools "link up with the top schools in a mentoring partnership, to gain from their experience and knowledge." By way of background, School Performance Profiles (SPP), unveiled last fall, rate public schools on as many as 30 indicators in four categories: academic achievement, academic growth, closing the achievement gap, and other indicators such as graduation and attendance rates. Schools may also earn up to seven points via "extra credit" based upon high performance on state and industry assessments as well as for students earning a score of 3 or higher on Advanced Placement exams. Not all indicators apply to every school; for example, third-grade reading proficiency will not factor into a high school's score. Additionally, not all measures are applicable this year; the "closing the achievement gap" category does not apply to schools until the end of the 2013-14 school year. To provide detail on the schools and students this initiative may affect, Research for Action (RFA) has prepared an initial analysis based on publicly-available data from PDE. Decades of research show income stratification is one of the strongest predictors of student outcomes. Since SPP scores are heavily weighted based on standardized test scores, schools that enroll high numbers of traditionally-disadvantaged students face particular challenges in meeting the eligibility requirements for the initiative. RFA will provide additional analysis of implications of the Governor's budget address in the weeks ahead.
- Published
- 2014
4. An Analysis of Pennsylvania's Cyber Charter Schools. Issue Brief
- Author
-
Research for Action, Jack, James, Sludden, John, and Schott, Adam
- Abstract
Pennsylvania's first cyber charter school opened in 1998, enrolling 44 full-time students. From this modest beginning, Pennsylvania's cyber charter sector has grown to 16 schools enrolling 35,000 students from all but one school district in the Commonwealth. Pennsylvania has one of the nation's most extensive cyber charter sectors, and six additional proposed schools are before the Department of Education (PDE) for review. The recent growth in the sector coincides with increasing attention from state policymakers. As of this writing, there are at least 12 legislative proposals pending in the Pennsylvania General Assembly addressing cyber authorization, funding, or oversight. To help situate cyber charter schools within a state context, Research for Action (RFA) examined the state's recently-issued School Performance Profile (SPP) scores for the 11 cyber charters for which complete data are available. RFA then compared these scores to all public schools statewide, including traditional public schools and brick-and-mortar charters. RFA's analysis is based on publicly-available data from PDE's School Performance Profile. Also, given the relationship between student mobility and academic achievement, RFA examined enrollment into and out of five cyber charters for which data were available during the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years. RFA reviewed the demographics of the student populations in cyber charter schools as compared to traditional public schools and brick-and-mortar charters. Main findings for these anlyses are reported here in tabulated form. A glossary of terms is included. Appendix A, "Cyber Charter Enrollment Trends for the 2011 and 2012 School Years", is presented in table 6.
- Published
- 2013
5. School Closings in Philadelphia
- Author
-
Jack, James and Sludden, John
- Abstract
In 2012, the School District of Philadelphia closed six schools. In 2013, it closed 24. The closure of 30 schools has occurred amid a financial crisis, headlined by the district's $1.35 billion deficit. School closures are one piece of the district's plan to cut expenditures and close its budget gap. The closures are also intended to make Philadelphia's school system more efficient. Superintendent William Hite summarized the strategy: "This path will lead to greater educational investments throughout our more than 200 schools and improved educational outcomes for students. This path will reverse our enrollment declines as we create safer, more modern learning environments and build sustainable community partnerships and coalitions" (Hangley Jr., 2013). Research on the experiences of other major school districts that have undertaken large-scale school closings suggests a gap between the stated goals of the district's plans and the likely outcomes, particularly regarding academic and financial benefits to district students, staff, and taxpayers (Shaw & Schott, 2013). Despite existing evidence and significant opposition, large-scale closings proceeded in Philadelphia. The intent of this article is to examine why. Herein the author investigates school closings, the policies and factors contributing to these decisions, existing research on this subject, and what these developments may portend for the years ahead in Philadelphia.
- Published
- 2013
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.