Search

OBJECTIVE: Children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) show early neurobehavioral deficits that can persist several years after injury. Despite the negative impact that TBI can have on a child's physical, cognitive, and psychosocial well-being, only 1 study to date has documented the receipt of health care services after acute care and the needs of children after TBI. The purpose of this study was to document the health care use and needs of children after a TBI and to identify factors that are associated with unmet or unrecognized health care needs during the first year after injury. METHODS: The health care use and needs of children who sustained a TBI were obtained via telephone interview with a primary caregiver at 2 and 12 months after injury. Of the 330 who enrolled in the study, 302 (92%) completed the 3-month and 288 (87%) completed the 12-month follow-up interviews. The health care needs of each child were categorized as no need, met need, unmet need, or unrecognized need on the basis of the child's use of post-acute services, the caregiver's report of unmet need, and the caregiver's report of the child's functioning as measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Regardless of the use of services or level of function, children of caregivers who reported an unmet need for a health care service were defined as having unmet need. Children who were categorized as having no needs were defined as those who did not receive services; whose caregiver did not report unmet need for a service; and the whose physical, socioemotional, and cognitive functioning was reported to be normal by the caregiver. Children with met needs were those who used services in a particular domain and whose caregivers did not report need for additional services. Finally, children with unrecognized needs were those whose caregiver reported cognitive, physical, or socioemotional dysfunction; who were not receiving services to address the dysfunction; and whose caregiver did not report unmet need for services. Polytomous logistic regression was used to model unmet and unrecognized need at 3 and 12 months after injury as a function of child, family, and injury characteristics. RESULTS: At 3 months after injury, 62% of the study sample reported receiving at least 1 outpatient health care service. Most frequently, children visited a doctor (56%) or a physical therapist (27%); however, 37% of caregivers reported that their child did not see a physician at all during the first year after injury. At 3 and 12 months after injury, 26% and 31% of children, respectively, had unmet/unrecognized health care needs. The most frequent type of unmet or unrecognized need was for cognitive services. The top 3 reasons for unmet need at 3 and 12 months were (1) not recommended by doctor (34% and 31%); (2) not recommended/provided by school (16% and 17%); and (3) cost too much (16% and 16%). Factors that were associated with unmet or unrecognized need changed over time. At 3 months after injury, the caregivers of children with a preexisting psychosocial condition were 3 times more likely to report unmet need compared with children who did not have one. Also, female caregivers were significantly more likely to report unmet need compared with male caregivers. Finally, the caregivers of children with Medicaid were almost 2 times more likely to report unmet need compared with children who were covered by commercial insurance. The only factor that was associated with unrecognized need at 3 months after injury was abnormal family functioning. At 12 months after injury, although TBI severity was not significant, children who sustained a major associated injury were 2 times more likely to report unmet need compared with children who did not. Consistent with the 3-month results, the caregivers of children with Medicaid were significantly more likely to report unmet needs at 1 year after injury. In addition to poor family functioning's being associated with unrecognized need, nonwhite children were significantly more likely to have unrecognized needs at 1 year compared with white children. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of children with TBI had unmet or unrecognized health care needs during the first year after injury. It is recommended that pediatricians be involved in the post-acute care follow-up of children with TBI to ensure that the injured child's needs are being addressed in a timely and appropriate manner. One of the recommendations that trauma center providers should make on hospital discharge is that the parent/primary caregiver schedule a visit with the child's pediatrician regardless of the post-acute services that the child may be receiving. Because unmet and unrecognized need was highest for cognitive services, it is important to screen for cognitive dysfunction in the primary care setting. Finally, because the health care needs of children with TBI change over time, it is important for pediatricians to monitor their recovery to ensure that children with TBI receive the services that they need to restore their health after injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Valid clinical outcome assessments with the ability to capture meaningful aspects of neurodevelopment for individuals with neurogenetic conditions associated with profound functional impairments are lacking, yet critical for clinical care and clinical trial readiness. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine and compare the initial psychometric properties of a series of commonly used standardized and norm-referenced measures of cognition and adaptive functioning as well as alternative measures of neurobehavioral functioning designed to capture responsivity (i.e., alertness, awareness, responsivity to the environment) in those with acquired brain injuries in a sample of individuals with severe to profound functional impairment associated with a neurogenetic etiology. Ten individuals (median age = 7.5 years, IQR = 4.8-11.5, range 4-21; n = 8 male) with severe to profound functional impairment associated with SCN2A-Related Disorder and their parents were included in this study. Parents completed the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition Comprehensive Interview (Vineland-3) and the Developmental Profile, Fourth Edition Cognitive Scale (DP-4) and their children completed the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Cognitive Scale (Bayley-4; given out of the standardized age-range) and two measures of responsivity, the Coma Recovery Scale, Pediatric and the Rappaport Coma/Near Coma Scale. Results demonstrated exceptionally low skills (median Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Composite = 35.5) and frequent floor effects across norm-referenced measures (i.e., Vineland-3, DP-4, Bayley-4); however, raw scores yielded more range and variability and no absolute floor effects. There were also no floor effects on measures of responsivity and findings suggest that these alternative tools may capture more variability in some aspects of neurobehavioral functioning that are critical to higher order cognitive functions, particularly for those with mental-ages below a 12 month-level. Initial evidence of construct validity of all measures in this population was shown. Findings support ongoing investigation of measures of responsivity and identified areas of potential measure modification that may improve applicability for individuals with severe to profound functional impairment associated with neurogenetic as opposed to acquired etiologies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The recent publication of practice guidelines for management of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) in the United States and Europe was a major step forward in improving the accuracy and consistency of terminology, diagnostic criteria, and prognostication in this population. There remains a pressing need for a more precise brain injury classification system that combines clinical semiology with neuroimaging, electrophysiologic, and other biomarker data. To address this need, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke launched the Common Data Elements (CDEs) initiative to facilitate systematic collection of high-quality research data in studies involving patients with neurological disease. The Neurocritical Care Society's Curing Coma Campaign expanded this effort in 2018 to develop CDEs for DoC. Herein, we present CDE recommendations for behavioral phenotyping of patients with DoC., Methods: The Behavioral Phenotyping Workgroup used a preestablished, five-step process to identify and select candidate CDEs that included review of existing National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke CDEs, nomination and systematic vetting of new CDEs, CDE classification, iterative review, and approval of panel recommendations and development of corresponding case review forms., Results: We identified a slate of existing and newly proposed basic, supplemental, and exploratory CDEs that can be used for behavioral phenotyping of adult and pediatric patients with DoC., Conclusions: The proposed behavioral phenotyping CDEs will assist with international harmonization of DoC studies and allow for more precise characterization of study cohorts, favorably impacting observational studies and clinical trials aimed at improving outcome in this population., (© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.)

Objectives: Sedation and analgesia for infants and children requiring mechanical ventilation in the PICU is uniquely challenging due to the wide spectrum of ages, developmental stages, and pathophysiological processes encountered. Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of sedative and analgesic management in pediatric patients have used heterogeneous methodologies. The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) IV hosted a series of multidisciplinary meetings to establish consensus statements for future clinical study design and implementation as a guide for investigators studying PICU sedation and analgesia., Design: Twenty-five key elements framed as consensus statements were developed in five domains: study design, enrollment, protocol, outcomes and measurement instruments, and future directions., Setting: A virtual meeting was held on March 2-3, 2022, followed by an in-person meeting in Washington, DC, on June 15-16, 2022. Subsequent iterative online meetings were held to achieve consensus., Subjects: Fifty-one multidisciplinary, international participants from academia, industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and family members of PICU patients attended the virtual and in-person meetings. Participants were invited based on their background and experience., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Common themes throughout the SCEPTER IV consensus statements included using coordinated multidisciplinary and interprofessional teams to ensure culturally appropriate study design and diverse patient enrollment, obtaining input from PICU survivors and their families, engaging community members, and using developmentally appropriate and validated instruments for assessments of sedation, pain, iatrogenic withdrawal, and ICU delirium., Conclusions: These SCEPTER IV consensus statements are comprehensive and may assist investigators in the design, enrollment, implementation, and dissemination of studies involving sedation and analgesia of PICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Implementation may strengthen the rigor and reproducibility of research studies on PICU sedation and analgesia and facilitate the synthesis of evidence across studies to improve the safety and quality of care for PICU patients., Competing Interests: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors, none of whom have financial conflicts of interest specifically related to the issues discussed in this article, and no official endorsement by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or those entities that provided grants to support the activities of the Analgesic, Anesthetic, Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks public-private partnership. Drs. Lee, Jackson, Biagas, Houck, Smith, Ward, Zimmerman, and Huang received funding from Analgesic, Anesthetic, Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION). Dr. Beers disclosed that she is part-time ad hoc faculty at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Berkenbosch received funding from Innovation Consulting; he disclosed that he is a consulting bureau member for Medtronic; and he received support for article research from ACTTION-Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER)-public-private consortium with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Dr. Dworkin’s institution received funding from the FDA; he received funding from Abide, Acadia, Adynxx, Analgesic Solutions, Aptinyx, Aquinox, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Beckley, Biogen, Biohaven, Biosplice, Boston Scientific, Braeburn, Cardialen, Centrexion, Chiesi, Chromocell, Clexio, Collegium, CombiGene, Confo, Decibel, Editas, Eli Lilly, Endo, Ethismos (equity), Eupraxia, Exicure, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Gloriana, Hope, Kriya, Lotus, Mainstay, Merck, Mind Medicine (also equity), Neumentum, Neurana, NeuroBo, Novaremed, Novartis, OliPass, Orion, Oxford Cannabinoid Technologies, Pfizer, Q-State, Reckitt Benckiser, Regenacy (also equity), Rho, Sangamo, Sanifit, Scilex, Semnur, SIMR Biotech, Sinfonia, SK Biopharmaceuticals, Sollis, SPM Therapeutics, SPRIM Health, Teva, Theranexus, Vertex, Vizuri, and WCG. Dr. Smith received funding for an ongoing sedation trial in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr. Ward received funding from the Maine State Board of Education. Dr. Zimmerman’s institution received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the FDA, and the Biogen Foundation. Dr. Horvat’s institution received funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Drs. Horvat and Sun received support for article research from the NIH. Drs. Salorio and Slomine received funding from the Innovations Consulting Group. Dr. Slater’s institution received funding from Wellcome and the Annabels Foundation; she received funding from Reckitt; she received support for article research from Wellcome Trust/Charity Open Access Fund. Dr. Slomine received funding from Cambridge University Press and Goodell, Devries, Leech & Dann, LLP. Dr. West disclosed that she is employed at Georgia Tech and that she is the President of International Children’s Advisory Network. Dr. Wypij received funding from SCEPTER IV. Dr. Yeates’ institution received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; he received funding from Guilford Publications and the American Psychological Association. Dr. Sun received funding from McGraw Hill; she disclosed that she is Co-Editor-in-Chief of Anesthesiology UpToDate. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Introduction: Hospitalized children diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2-related conditions are at risk for new or persistent symptoms and functional impairments. Our objective was to analyze post-hospital symptoms, healthcare utilization, and outcomes of children previously hospitalized and diagnosed with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C)., Methods: Prospective, multicenter electronic survey of parents of children <18 years of age surviving hospitalization from 12 U.S. centers between January 2020 and July 2021. The primary outcome was a parent report of child recovery status at the time of the survey (recovered vs. not recovered). Secondary outcomes included new or persistent symptoms, readmissions, and health-related quality of life. Multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression was performed for the association of patient, disease, laboratory, and treatment variables with recovered status., Results: The children [ n  = 79; 30 (38.0%) female] with acute SARS-CoV-2 (75.7%) or MIS-C (24.3%) had a median age of 6.5 years (interquartile range 2.0-13.0) and 51 (64.6%) had a preexisting condition. Fifty children (63.3%) required critical care. One-third [23/79 (29.1%)] were not recovered at follow-up [43 (31, 54) months post-discharge]. Admission C-reactive protein levels were higher in children not recovered vs. recovered [5.7 (1.3, 25.1) vs. 1.3 (0.4, 6.3) mg/dl, p  = 0.02]. At follow-up, 67% overall had new or persistent symptoms. The most common symptoms were fatigue (37%), weakness (25%), and headache (24%), all with frequencies higher in children not recovered. Forty percent had at least one return emergency visit and 24% had a hospital readmission. Recovered status was associated with better total HRQOL [87 (77, 95) vs. 77 (51, 83), p  = 0.01]. In multivariable analysis, lower admission C-reactive protein [odds ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.82, 0.99)] and higher admission lymphocyte count [1.001 (1.0002, 1.002)] were associated with recovered status., Conclusions: Children considered recovered by their parents following hospitalization with SARS-CoV-2-related conditions had less symptom frequency and better HRQOL than those reported as not recovered. Increased inflammation and lower lymphocyte count on hospital admission may help to identify children needing longitudinal, multidisciplinary care., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04379089)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer MP-E declared a past co-authorship with the author LD to the handling editor., (© 2024 Fink, Alcamo, Lovett, Hartman, Williams, Garcia, Rasmussen, Pal, Drury, MackDiaz, Ferrazzano, Dervan, Appavu, Snooks, Stulce, Rubin, Pate, Toney, Robertson, Wainwright, Roa, Schober and Slomine.)

Background: The fundamental gap obstructing forward progress of evidenced-based care in pediatric and neonatal disorders of consciousness (DoC) is the lack of defining consensus-based terminology to perform comparative research. This lack of shared nomenclature in pediatric DoC stems from the inherently recursive dilemma of the inability to reliably measure consciousness in the very young. However, recent advancements in validated clinical examinations and technologically sophisticated biomarkers of brain activity linked to future abilities are unlocking this previously formidable challenge to understanding the DoC in the developing brain., Methods: To address this need, the first of its kind international convergence of an interdisciplinary team of pediatric DoC experts was organized by the Neurocritical Care Society's Curing Coma Campaign. The multidisciplinary panel of pediatric DoC experts proposed pediatric-tailored common data elements (CDEs) covering each of the CDE working groups including behavioral phenotyping, biospecimens, electrophysiology, family and goals of care, neuroimaging, outcome and endpoints, physiology and big Data, therapies, and pediatrics., Results: We report the working groups' pediatric-focused DoC CDE recommendations and disseminate CDEs to be used in studies of pediatric patients with DoC., Conclusions: The CDEs recommended support the vision of progressing collaborative and successful internationally collaborative pediatric coma research., (© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.)

Children with acquired brain injury may experience prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC); research on children with DoC lags behind adult literature. Rigorous evaluation of assessment tools used in children with DoC is lacking, though recent developments may contribute to improvements in care, particularly for assessment of young children and those without overt command following. Literature on prognosis continues to grow, reinforcing that early signs of consciousness suggest better long-term outcome. Although large clinical trials for children with DoC are lacking, single-site and multisite programmatic data inform standards of care and treatment options for children with DoC., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Examine initial feasibility/utility of a telephone-administered measure in describing impact of child health on caregiver/family functioning in patients with a history of a disorder of consciousness (DoC) due to severe-acquired brain injury (ABI)., Method: Caregivers of patients admitted at least 1 year prior for inpatient rehabilitation with DoC completed a battery of measures administered via telephone examining the impact of child health on caregiver/family functioning (Pediatric Quality of Life Family Impact Module; PedsQL-FIM) and child functioning., Results: Forty-one caregivers of unique patients (age = 5-22 years; M  = 14.9, SD  = 5.1; 63% male; time since injury = 1-18 years; M  = 5.3; SD  = 4.2) completed the telephone measures. PedsQL-FIM floor and ceiling effects were minimal (administration time = 5-16 min, M  = 7.4; SD  = 2.8). Family functioning was lowest in Daily Activities and highest in Family Relationships. Relative to caregivers of patients with mild-severe ABI, caregivers reported lower caregiver/family functioning. Correlations were moderate between child functioning and caregiver/family functioning on some PedsQL-FIM scales., Conclusions: Within this relatively small convenience sample, results indicate the PedsQL-FIM administered via telephone is feasible and useful in describing the impact of child health on caregiver/family functioning long after DoC associated with ABI. Future studies are needed to understand factors contributing to caregiver/family functioning to inform targeted interventions.

Objective: To examine the utility of head and trunk control, assessed using the Physical Abilities and Mobility Scale, for predicting emergence from a minimally conscious state (eMCS) among children with acquired brain injury admitted to inpatient rehabilitation in a disorder of consciousness (DoC)., Design: Retrospective study., Setting: Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation hospital., Participants: Forty patients (2-21 years-old) directly admitted from acute care to pediatric inpatient brain injury rehabilitation in a DoC (average length of stay=85 days; N=40)., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: State of consciousness (eMCS vs not) at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation., Results: Forty-five percent of patients emerged from a minimally conscious state during inpatient rehabilitation. Admission state of consciousness and head control (but not trunk control) were significantly associated with eMCS and provided complementary prognostic information. Admission state of consciousness (ie, admitting in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome) afforded the greatest negative predictive value (93.8%), whereas admission head control ability afforded the greatest positive predictive value (81.8% for any independent head control; 100% for maintaining head-up position for >30 seconds). Fifty percent of patients who emerged during the inpatient stay did not have independent head control at admission, highlighting the importance of exploring head control as a prognostic marker in conjunction with indicators with greater sensitivity (eg, state of consciousness at admission)., Conclusions: A brief measure of head control at admission may contribute to identification of a subgroup of patients who are likely to emerge., (Copyright © 2023 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of disorders of consciousness (DoC) in pediatric patients have not yet been released. We aimed to summarize available evidence for DoC with >14 days duration to support the future development of guidelines for children, adolescents and young adults aged 6 months-18 years., Methods: This scoping review was reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search identified records from 4 databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Abstracts received 3 blind reviews. Corresponding full-text articles rated as "in-scope" and reporting data not published in any other retained article (i.e., no double reporting) were identified and assigned to 5 thematic evaluating teams. Full-text articles were reviewed using a double-blind standardized form. Level of evidence was graded, and summative statements were generated., Results: On November 9, 2022, 2,167 documents had been identified; 132 articles were retained, of which 33 (25%) were published over the past 5 years. Overall, 2,161 individuals met the inclusion criteria; female patients were 527 of 1,554 (33.9%) cases included, whose sex was identifiable. Of 132 articles, 57 (43.2%) were single case reports and only 5 (3.8%) clinical trials; the level of evidence was prevalently low (80/132; 60.6%). Most studies included neurobehavioral measures (84/127; 66.1%) and neuroimaging (81/127; 63.8%); 59 (46.5%) were mainly related to diagnosis, 56 (44.1%) to prognosis, and 44 (34.6%) to treatment. Most frequently used neurobehavioral tools included the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, Coma/Near-Coma Scale, Level of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale, and Post-Acute Level of Consciousness scale. EEG, event-related potentials, structural CT, and MRI were the most frequently used instrumental techniques. In 29/53 (54.7%) cases, DoC improvement was observed, which was associated with treatment with amantadine., Discussion: The literature on pediatric DoCs is mainly observational, and clinical details are either inconsistently presented or absent. Conclusions drawn from many studies convey insubstantial evidence and have limited validity and low potential for translation in clinical practice. Despite these limitations, our work summarizes the extant literature and constitutes a base for future guidelines related to the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of pediatric DoC., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

The Physical and Neurological Examination of Subtle Signs (PANESS) is a brief neuromotor exam designed for use in children. This study examined the inter-rater reliability of PANESS scoring using video review in 23 typically developing youth, aged 10-18 years, who were either never-concussed or evaluated following clinical recovery from concussion. Moderate to excellent inter-rater reliability was identified across PANESS subscores and total score. The strongest inter-rater reliability was observed for the Timed Motor portion of the PANESS (ICCs >.90) suggesting that this section in particular may be a strong candidate for video-based scoring or telehealth administration.

Objective: To determine program satisfaction and preliminary efficacy of Traumatic Brain Injury Positive Strategies (TIPS), a web-based training for parenting strategies after child brain injury., Design: A randomized controlled trial with parallel assignment to TIPS intervention or usual-care control (TAU). The three testing time-points were pretest, posttest within 30 days of assignment, and 3-month follow-up. Reported in accordance with CONSORT extensions to randomized feasibility and pilot trials SETTING: Online., Participants: Eighty-three volunteers recruited nationally who were 18 years of age or older, U.S. residents, English speaking and reading, had access to high-speed internet, and were living with and caring for a child who was hospitalized overnight with a brain injury (ages 3-18 years, able to follow simple commands; N=83)., Interventions: Eight interactive behavioral training modules on parent strategies. The usual-care control was an informational website., Main Outcome Measures: The proximal outcomes were User Satisfaction, Usefulness, Usability, Feature Preference, Strategy Utilization and Effectiveness, and Learning and Self-Efficacy for TIPS program participants. The primary outcomes were: Strategy Knowledge, Application, and Strategy-Application Confidence; Family Impact Module of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL); and Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale. The secondary outcomes were TIPS vs TCore PedsQL and Health Behavior Inventory (HBI) RESULTS: Pre- and posttest assessments were completed by 76 of 83 caregivers; 74 completed their 3-month follow-up. Linear growth models indicated that relative to TAU, TIPS yielded greater increases in Strategy Knowledge over the 3-month study (d=.61). Other comparisons did not reach significance. Outcomes were not moderated by child age, SES, or disability severity measured by Cognitive Function Module of PedsQL. All TIPS participants were satisfied with the program., Conclusions: Of the 10 outcomes tested, only TBI knowledge significantly improved relative to TAU., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Survival following pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has improved over the past 2 decades but data on survivors' long-term outcomes are limited. We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes in pediatric OHCA survivors more than one year after cardiac arrest., Methods: OHCA survivors <18 years old who received post-cardiac arrest care in the PICU at a single center between 2008-2018 were included. Parents of patients <18 years and patients ≥18 years at least one year after cardiac arrest completed a telephone interview. We assessed neurologic outcome (Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category [PCPC]), activities of daily living (Pediatric Glasgow Outcomes Scale-Extended, Functional Status Scale (FSS)), HRQL (Pediatric Quality of Life Core and Family Impact Modules), and healthcare utilization. Unfavorable neurologic outcome was defined as PCPC > 1 or worsening from pre-arrest baseline to discharge., Findings: Forty four patients were evaluable. Follow-up occurred at a median of 5.6 years [IQR 4.4, 8.9] post-arrest. Median age at arrest was 5.3 [1.3,12.6] years; median CPR duration was 5 [1.5, 7] minutes. Survivors with unfavorable outcome at discharge had worse FSS Sensory and Motor Function scores and higher rates of rehabilitation service utilization. Parents of survivors with unfavorable outcome reported greater disruption to family functioning. Healthcare utilization and educational support requirements were common among all survivors., Conclusions: Survivors of pediatric OHCA with unfavorable outcome at discharge have more impaired function multiple years post-arrest. Survivors with favorable outcome may experience impairments and significant healthcare needs not fully captured by the PCPC at hospital discharge., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To (1) describe characteristics of children with anoxic or hypoxic brain injuries (AnHBI) who presented to an inpatient rehabilitation unit, (2) explore functional outcomes of children with AnHBI at discharge, and (3) examine differences between children with AnHBI associated with cardiac arrest (CA) vs those with respiratory arrest (RA) only., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation hospital in the Northeast United States., Participants: A total of 46 children and adolescents ages 11 months to 18 years admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation brain injury unit (1994-2018) for a first inpatient admission after AnHBI., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category Scale (PCPC), Pediatric Overall Performance Category, and Functional Independence Measure for Children developmental functional quotients (WeeFIM DFQs) total and subscale scores., Results: Most children had no disability before injury (PCPC=normal, n=37/46) and displayed significant functional impairments at admission to inpatient rehabilitation (PCPC=normal/mild, n=1/46). WeeFIM and PCPC scores improved significantly during inpatient rehabilitation (WeeFIM DFQ Total, P=.003; PCPC, P<.001), although many children continued to demonstrate significant impairments at discharge (PCPC=normal/mild, n=5/46). Functioning was better for the RA-only group relative to the CA group at admission (WeeFIM DFQ Total, P=.006) and discharge (WeeFIM DFQ Total, P<.001). Ongoing gains in functioning were noted 3 months after discharge compared with discharge (WeeFIM DFQ Cognitive, P=.008)., Conclusions: In this group of children with AnHBI who received inpatient rehabilitation, functional status improves significantly between rehabilitation admission and discharge. By discharge, many children continued to display significant impairments, a minority of children had favorable neurologic outcomes, and children with CA have worse outcomes than those with RA-only. Given the small sample size, future research should examine functional recovery during inpatient rehabilitation in a larger, multisite cohort and include longer-term follow-up to examine recovery patterns over time., (Copyright © 2023 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This proceedings article presents the scope of pediatric coma and disorders of consciousness based on presentations and discussions at the First Pediatric Disorders of Consciousness Care and Research symposium held on September 14th, 2021. Herein we review the current state of pediatric coma care and research opportunities as well as shared experiences from seasoned researchers and clinicians. Salient current challenges and opportunities in pediatric and neonatal coma care and research were identified through the contributions of the presenters, who were Jose I. Suarez, MD, Nina F. Schor, MD, PhD, Beth S. Slomine, PhD Erika Molteni, PhD, and Jan-Marino Ramirez, PhD, and moderated by Varina L. Boerwinkle, MD, with overview by Mark Wainwright, MD, and subsequent audience discussion. The program, executively planned by Varina L. Boerwinkle, MD, Mark Wainwright, MD, and Michelle Elena Schober, MD, drove the identification and development of priorities for the pediatric neurocritical care community., (© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.)

Objective: We describe the clinical implementation in North America of Teen Online Problem Solving (TOPS), a 10+ session, evidence-based telehealth intervention providing training in problem-solving, emotion regulation, and communication skills., Methods: Twelve children's hospitals and three rehabilitation hospitals participated, agreeing to train a minimum of five therapists to deliver the program and to enroll two patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBI) per month. Barriers to reach and adoption were addressed during monthly calls, resulting in expansion of the program to other neurological conditions and extending training to speech therapists., Results: Over 26 months, 381 patients were enrolled (199 TBI, 182 other brain conditions), and 101 completed the program. A total of 307 therapists were trained, and 58 went on to deliver the program. Institutional, provider, and patient barriers and strategies to address them are discussed., Conclusions: The TOPS implementation process highlights the challenges of implementing complex pediatric neurorehabilitation programs while underscoring potential avenues for improving reach and adoption., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Wade, Walsh, Slomine, Davis, Heard, Maggard, Sutcliffe, Van Tubbergen, McNally, Deidrick, Kirkwood, Lantagne, Ashman, Scratch, Chesley, Johnson-Kerner, Johnson, Cirincione and Austin.)

Objectives: Examine initial feasibility and utility of a battery of measures administered via telephone interview with a caregiver for describing long-term outcomes in individuals with a history of disorders of consciousness (DoC) after pediatric acquired brain injury (ABI)., Design: Cross-sectional., Setting: Caregiver interview administered via telephone., Patients: Convenience sample admitted to an inpatient pediatric neurorehabilitation unit with DoC after ABI at least 1 year prior to assessment (n = 41, 5-22 yr old at assessment)., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3), and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Pediatric Revision (GOS-E Peds) were examined. Administration time of the Vineland-3 ranged from 13 to 101 minutes (m = 50) and the GOS-E Peds ranged from 2 to 10 minutes (m = 3). Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Composite (ABC) ranged from standard scores (SSs) of 20 (exceptionally low) to 100 (average) and GOS-E Peds scores ranged from 3 (i.e., upper moderate disability) to 7 (vegetative state). Lower adaptive functioning on the Vineland-3 ABC was strongly associated with greater disability on the GOS-E Peds (r = -0.805). On the Vineland-3 ABC, 19.5% earned the lowest possible score, whereas 12.2% obtained the lowest possible score for survivors on the GOS-E Peds; only 7.3% earned lowest scores on both measures., Conclusions: The Vineland-3 and GOS-E Peds were feasibly administered by telephone and were complementary in this cohort; the GOS-E provided a quick and easy measure of gross functional outcome, whereas the Vineland-3 took longer to administer but provided a greater level of detail about functioning. When both measures were used together, the range and variability of scores were maximized., Competing Interests: Drs. Ludwig’s, Suskauer’s, Borda’s, and Slomine’s institutions received funding from the Foundation for PM&R Gabriella Molnar Pediatric PM&R Research Grant. Dr. Lahey received funding from the Kennedy Krieger Institute. Dr. Slomine received funding from the National Academy of Neuropsychology and the Cambridge University Press. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Neuropsychologists working in a pediatric neurorehabilitation setting provide care for children and adolescents with acquired brain injuries (ABI) and play a vital role on the interdisciplinary treatment team. This role draws on influences from the field of clinical neuropsychology and its pediatric subspecialty, as well as rehabilitation psychology. This combination of specialties is uniquely suited for working with ABI across the continuum of recovery. ABI recovery often involves a changing picture that spans across stages of recovery (e.g., disorders of consciousness, confusional state, acute cognitive impairment), where each stage presents with distinctive characteristics that warrant a specific evidence-based approach. Assessment and intervention are used reciprocally to inform diagnostics, treatment, and academic planning, and to support patient and family adjustment. Neuropsychologists work with the interdisciplinary teams to collect and integrate data related to brain injury recovery and use this data for treatment planning and clinical decision making. These approaches must often be adapted and adjusted in real time as patients recover, demanding a dynamic expertise that is currently not supported through formal training curriculum or practice guidelines. This paper outlines the roles and responsibilities of pediatric rehabilitation neuropsychologists across the stages of ABI recovery with the goal of increasing awareness in order to continue to develop and formalize this role.

Objectives: To identify a PICU Core Outcome Measurement Set (PICU COMS), a set of measures that can be used to evaluate the PICU Core Outcome Set (PICU COS) domains in PICU patients and their families., Design: A modified Delphi consensus process., Setting: Four webinars attended by PICU physicians and nurses, pediatric surgeons, rehabilitation physicians, and scientists with expertise in PICU clinical care or research ( n = 35). Attendees were from eight countries and convened from the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Pediatric Outcomes STudies after PICU Investigators and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network PICU COS Investigators., Subjects: Measures to assess outcome domains of the PICU COS are as follows: cognitive, emotional, overall (including health-related quality of life), physical, and family health. Measures evaluating social health were also considered., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: Measures were classified as general or additional based on generalizability across PICU populations, feasibility, and relevance to specific COS domains. Measures with high consensus, defined as 80% agreement for inclusion, were selected for the PICU COMS. Among 140 candidate measures, 24 were delineated as general (broadly applicable) and, of these, 10 achieved consensus for inclusion in the COMS (7 patient-oriented and 3 family-oriented). Six of the seven patient measures were applicable to the broadest range of patients, diagnoses, and developmental abilities. All were validated in pediatric populations and have normative pediatric data. Twenty additional measures focusing on specific populations or in-depth evaluation of a COS subdomain also met consensus for inclusion as COMS additional measures., Conclusions: The PICU COMS delineates measures to evaluate domains in the PICU COS and facilitates comparability across future research studies to characterize PICU survivorship and enable interventional studies to target long-term outcomes after critical illness., Competing Interests: Dr. Maddux’s institution received funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (K23HD096018) and the Francis Family Foundation, Parker B Francis Fellowship. Drs. Maddux, Jarvis, Killien, Meert, Olson, and Fink received support for article research from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Drs. Jarvis, Michelson, Beers, Meert, and Fink’s institutions received funding from the NIH. Dr. Jarvis received funding from the NIH (T32 HD040686). Dr. Killien and Olson’s institutions received funding from the NICHD. Dr. Choong’s institution received funding from the AFP Innovation Fund; she received funding from McMaster University. Dr. Michelson’s institution received funding from The National Palliative Care Research Center, and the Greenwall Foundation. Dr. Lee’s institution received funding from the National Medical Research Council, Singapore. Dr. Slomine received funding from the National Academy of Neuropsychology and Cambridge University Press. Dr. Beers’ institution received funding from the National Football League Brain Health Study. Dr. Morrow received funding from EduPro, Imperial College Press, the University of Cape Town, and the South African Society of Physiotherapy. Dr. Fink’s institution received funding from the Neurocritical Care Society; she received funding from the Child Nervous Society and the American Board of Pediatrics CCM Subsection member. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.)

Context: Objective and expedient assessments of standing postural control incorporating static and dynamic tasks are necessary for identifying subtle motor deficits and clearing children to return to high-risk activities after concussion. The Revised Physical and Neurological Examination for Subtle Signs (PANESS) gaits and stations tasks evaluate both static and dynamic aspects of postural control. While the PANESS gaits and stations subscale is sensitive to concussion in youth, the benefit of each specific task for this purpose is unknown., Purpose: This study evaluated whether specific PANESS tasks identify postural impairments after youth concussion., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: Academicallyaffiliated research laboratory., Participants: Sixty youth, ages 10-17 years, comprised 3 groups: (1) youth symptomatic from concussion (4-14 d postinjury [n = 18]), (2) clinically-recovered youth (27-122 d postinjury [n = 15]), and (3) age- and gender-matched never-concussed controls (n = 27)., Main Outcome Measure: PANESS gaits and stations tasks (6 dynamic and 3 static) at the time of the initial research visit., Results: Kruskal-Wallis statistic identified a significant main effect of group on standing on one foot (a 30-s task). Both symptomatic and clinically-recovered youth showed deficits on standing on one foot relative to controls., Conclusions: Single-leg tasks of longer duration may maximize the ability to detect residual postural deficits after concussion and can be readily incorporated in targeted sport rehabilitation protocols.

Objectives: To (1) determine if items on the Cognitive and Linguistic Scale (CALS) follow a Rasch distribution and (2) explore the relationship between Rasch-derived Cognitive Ability Estimates and outcome trajectory parameters using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach., Design: Retrospective study., Setting: Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation hospital., Participants: A total of 252 children (N=252) aged of 2-21 years (median, 11.8 [IQR, 6.4-15.9] years) consecutively admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation brain injury unit (2008-2014) for a first inpatient admission after acquired brain injury., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: Rasch-derived Cognitive Ability Estimates from the CALS and associated outcome trajectory parameters., Results: The CALS demonstrates adequate interval-scale properties with removal of scores from the arousal and responsivity items. Rasch-derived Cognitive Ability Estimates were associated with age (β=0.025, P<.001) such that older age was associated with a faster rate of recovery and more complete ultimate recovery. Slower recovery initiation was associated with a less complete overall cognitive recovery (Spearman ρ=-0.31; P<.001)., Conclusions: The Cognitive Ability Estimates derived from the CALS and associated outcome parameters (eg, rate of recovery) may serve as an ideal outcome measure for clinical trials evaluating interventions for acquired brain injury in a pediatric rehabilitation setting., (Copyright © 2021 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed healthcare utilization patterns and clinical practice, including pediatric mTBI evaluation and management. Providers treating pediatric mTBI, including neuropsychologists, have a unique role in evaluating and managing an already complex injury in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic with limited empirically based guidelines. In the present paper, we review usual, evidence-based pediatric mTBI care, highlight changes experienced by healthcare providers since the onset of the pandemic, and provide possible considerations and solutions. Three primary challenges to usual care are discussed, including changes to post-injury evaluation, management, and treatment of persistent symptoms. Changing patterns of healthcare utilization have created unique differences in mTBI identification and evaluation, including shifting injury frequency and mechanism, reluctance to seek healthcare, and increasing access to telemedicine. Typical injury management has been compromised by limited access to usual systems/activities (i.e., school, sports, social/leisure activities). Patients may be at higher risk for prolonged recovery due to pre-injury baseline elevations in acute and chronic stressors and reduced access to rehabilitative services targeting persistent symptoms. Considerations and solutions for addressing each of the three challenges are discussed. Neuropsychologists and other pediatric healthcare providers will need to continue to flexibly adapt to the changing needs of youth recovering from mTBI through the duration of the pandemic and beyond. Consistent with pre-pandemic consensus statements, neuropsychologists remain uniquely qualified to evaluate and manage mTBI and provide an increasingly integral role as members of multidisciplinary teams in the context of the global pandemic. Abbreviations : AAP: American Academy of Pediatrics; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 19; ED: emergency department; mTBI: Mild traumatic brain injury.

Objective: To examine professional stakeholders' perspectives of barriers to behavioral health care (BHC) follow-up and telepsychology after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI)., Methods: Twenty-nine professionals participated in a focus group (FG) or key informant interview (KII) between January and March 2020. Professionals answered questions about facilitators and barriers to BHC follow-up and telepsychology. Given widespread telepsychology implementation since COVID-19, a follow-up survey assessing telehealth perceptions since the pandemic was sent out in December 2020. Nineteen professionals completed the survey., Results: Professionals identified individual (e.g., family factors, insurance coverage/finances, transportation/distance, availability, planning follow-up care) and system-level (e.g., lack of access to BHC providers) barriers to BHC post-injury. Possible solutions, like collaborative follow-up care, were also identified. Generally, clinical professionals have favorable impressions of telepsychology and utilized services as a delivery modality for clinical care. Though telepsychology could reduce barriers to care, professionals also expressed concerns (e.g., technology issues, security/safety) and challenges (e.g., funding, accessibility, training/licensure for clinicians) with implementing telepsychology., Conclusion: Barriers identified highlight the need for context-specific solutions to increase BHC access, with telepsychology generally recognized as a beneficial modality for BHC. Future work should continue to focus on understanding barriers to BHC and potential solutions after pediatric TBI.

Purpose of Review: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a significant public health concern for children. This review summarizes recent literature on early symptoms and neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological outcomes following pediatric mTBI and highlights factors that predict prolonged recovery. Evidence-based recommendations for assessment and treatment are also discussed., Recent Findings: Whereas most children recover within 1 month after mTBI, 10-30% of children experience lingering neuropsychiatric or neuropsychological symptoms 3 months or more after injury. For the subset who experience prolonged recovery, new or worsening emotional and behavioral symptoms are the most frequent concerns. Recent research has suggested that specific factors, including preinjury mental health concerns, female sex, and family characteristics, are associated with increased risk of experiencing prolonged recovery. Early management includes reassurance, brief rest (1-3 days), and gradual return to typical activities. When symptoms linger for more than 4 weeks, evaluation in a specialty clinic is recommended and multimodal therapies are considered. Active recovery models, which include gradual return to aerobic exercise and cognitive behavioral approaches, are promising for the management of prolonged symptoms., Summary: A minority of children with mTBI experience prolonged neuropsychiatric or neuropsychological concerns. While our understanding of pediatric mTBI is growing, and recommendations for assessment and management have been developed, many gaps remain., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine whether children with brain tumors treated with resection benefit from inpatient rehabilitation and to explore what factors present at admission may predict better functional outcomes., Design: Retrospective cohort design., Setting: Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation unit., Participants: Forty patients (N=40; ages 3-21y; 42.5% female) admitted to the rehabilitation unit between 2003 and 2015 after brain tumor resection., Interventions: Patients received multidisciplinary rehabilitation therapies as part of their admission to inpatient rehabilitation, including occupational, physical, and speech-language therapy., Main Outcome Measures: Functional outcomes included the FIM for Children (WeeFIM) at discharge and 3-month follow-up as well as WeeFIM efficiency., Results: A repeated-measures analysis of variance using patient WeeFIM Developmental Functional Quotients (DFQs) at admission, discharge, and 3-month follow-up showed significant gains in total WeeFIM DFQ scores across time. Admission WeeFIM DFQ, time from surgery to admission, and age at admission provided the strongest model for predicting discharge and 3-month follow-up WeeFIM DFQ scores. Admission WeeFIM DFQ and time from surgery to admission provided the strongest model for predicting WeeFIM efficiency. Total Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) at admission did not add predictive power to any of the 3 models over and above patient characteristics (admission WeeFIM DFQ, age at admission, time from surgery to admission)., Conclusions: Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation after brain tumor resection made significant functional gains (as measured by the WeeFIM) during inpatient rehabilitation and continued to make significant gains 3 months after discharge. Age and timing of admission provided the strongest models for predicting patient outcomes. The NPS did not predict functional outcomes after rehabilitation when controlling for other variables known to influence rehabilitation outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate functional outcomes and state of consciousness at 1 year and ≥2 years postinjury in children who sustained a traumatic brain injury and were in a disorder of consciousness (DOC), either vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS), upon admission to inpatient rehabilitation., Design: Retrospective chart review., Setting: Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation unit., Participants: Children aged 2-18 years (N=37) who were admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with admission scores <30 on the Cognitive and Linguistic Scale (CALS)., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: Glasgow Outcome Scale- Extended, Pediatric Revision (GOS-E Peds), and state of consciousness based on previously established guidelines., Results: At admission, 16 children were in VS (43.2%) and 21 (56.8%) were in MCS. Children admitted in VS had a significantly longer time from injury to inpatient rehabilitation admission, lower CALS admission scores, were more likely to be in a DOC ≥28 days, and had greater disability at both follow-up time points. At the 1-year follow-up, 3 patients were in VS, 7 were in MCS, and 27 had emerged from MCS. By the time of the most recent follow-up (≥2y), 2 more patients had emerged from MCS. Across the cohort, GOS-E Peds scores at 1 year ranged from VS (GOS-E Peds, 7) to upper moderate disability (GOS-E Peds, 3). Most patients were functioning in the lower severe disability category (GOS-E Peds, 6) at 1 year (43.2%) and at the time of the most recent follow-up (43.2%). Twenty-seven patients (73.0%) showed stable GOS-E Peds scores between the 2 time points, 6 (16.2%) improved, and 4 (10.8%) were deceased., Conclusions: Although a majority of patients emerged from a DOC by 1 year postinjury, most continued to demonstrate notable functional impairment at the 1-year follow-up that persisted to the most recent follow-up. A small subset demonstrated important improvements between 1 year and the most recent follow-up (2 patients emerged, 6 patients showed improvement in GOS-E Peds scores)., (Copyright © 2021 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Studies of pediatric cardiac arrest use inconsistent outcomes, including return of spontaneous circulation and short-term survival, and basic assessments of functional and neurological status. In 2018, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation sponsored the COSCA initiative (Core Outcome Set After Cardiac Arrest) to improve consistency in reported outcomes of clinical trials of adult cardiac arrest survivors and supported this P-COSCA initiative (Pediatric COSCA). The P-COSCA Steering Committee generated a list of potential survival, life impact, and economic impact outcomes and assessment time points that were prioritized by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers, researchers, and parents/caregivers of children who survived cardiac arrest. Then expert panel discussions achieved consensus on the core outcomes, the methods to measure those core outcomes, and the timing of the measurements. The P-COSCA includes assessment of survival, brain function, cognitive function, physical function, and basic daily life skills. Survival and brain function are assessed at discharge or 30 days (or both if possible) and between 6 and 12 months after arrest. Cognitive function, physical function, and basic daily life skills are assessed between 6 and 12 months after cardiac arrest. Because many children have prearrest comorbidities, the P-COSCA also includes documentation of baseline (ie, prearrest) brain function and calculation of changes after cardiac arrest. Supplementary outcomes of survival, brain function, cognitive function, physical function, and basic daily life skills are assessed at 3 months and beyond 1 year after cardiac arrest if resources are available., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aim: Determine 1) frequency and risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest In-Hospital (THAPCA-IH) trial and associated outcomes; 2) impact of temperature management on post-IHCA AKI., Methods: Secondary analysis of THAPCA-IH; a randomized controlled multi-national trial at 37 children's hospitals., Eligibility: Serum creatinine (Cr) within 24 h of randomization., Outcomes: Prevalence of severe AKI defined by Stage 2 or 3 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Cr criteria. 12-month survival with favorable neurobehavioral outcome. Analyses stratified by entire cohort and cardiac subgroup. Risk factors and outcomes compared among cohorts with and without severe AKI., Results: Subject randomization: 159 to hypothermia, 154 to normothermia. Overall, 80% (249) developed AKI (any stage), and 66% (207) developed severe AKI. Cardiac patients (204, 65%) were more likely to develop severe AKI (72% vs 56%,p = 0.006). Preexisting cardiac or renal conditions, baseline lactate, vasoactive support, and systolic blood pressure were associated with severe AKI. Comparing hypothermia versus normothermia, there were no differences in severe AKI rate (63% vs 70%,p = 0.23), peak Cr, time to peak Cr, or freedom from mortality or severe AKI (p = 0.14). Severe AKI was associated with decreased hospital survival (48% vs 65%,p = 0.006) and decreased 12-month survival with favorable neurobehavioral outcome (30% vs 53%,p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Severe post-IHCA AKI occurred frequently especially in those with preexisting cardiac or renal conditions and peri-arrest hemodynamic instability. Severe AKI was associated with decreased survival with favorable neurobehavioral outcome. Hypothermia did not decrease incidence of severe AKI post-IHCA., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: More children are surviving critical illness but are at risk of residual or new health conditions. An evidence-informed and stakeholder-recommended core outcome set is lacking for pediatric critical care outcomes. Our objective was to create a multinational, multistakeholder-recommended pediatric critical care core outcome set for inclusion in clinical and research programs., Design: A two-round modified Delphi electronic survey was conducted with 333 invited research, clinical, and family/advocate stakeholders. Stakeholders completing the first round were invited to participate in the second. Outcomes scoring greater than 69% "critical" and less than 15% "not important" advanced to round 2 with write-in outcomes considered. The Steering Committee held a virtual consensus conference to determine the final components., Setting: Multinational survey., Patients: Stakeholder participants from six continents representing clinicians, researchers, and family/advocates., Measurements and Main Results: Overall response rates were 75% and 82% for each round. Participants voted on seven Global Domains and 45 Specific Outcomes in round 1, and six Global Domains and 30 Specific Outcomes in round 2. Using overall (three stakeholder groups combined) results, consensus was defined as outcomes scoring greater than 90% "critical" and less than 15% "not important" and were included in the final PICU core outcome set: four Global Domains (Cognitive, Emotional, Physical, and Overall Health) and four Specific Outcomes (Child Health-Related Quality of Life, Pain, Survival, and Communication). Families (n = 21) suggested additional critically important outcomes that did not meet consensus, which were included in the PICU core outcome set-extended., Conclusions: The PICU core outcome set and PICU core outcome set-extended are multistakeholder-recommended resources for clinical and research programs that seek to improve outcomes for children with critical illness and their families.

Introduction: Novel research suggests that children engaging in physical activity during recovery from concussion may recover more rapidly., Objective: To determine if level of physical activity at presentation to a rehabilitation-based concussion specialty clinic predicted days from injury to recovery., Design: Retrospective cohort., Setting: A concussion sub-specialty clinic at an academic institution., Patients: Retrospective review of medical records between September 2015 and February 2017 identified 178 children ages 6-17 years (mean age = 13.7 years; standard deviation [SD] = 2.7 years) who presented within 60 days of concussion and were ultimately deemed recovered and cleared to progress to full return to high-risk activities., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: Physical activity at initial visit was classified as none-to-light (79%) versus moderate-to-heavy (21%). A doubly robust, inverse probability of exposure weighted linear regression model was used to examine the relationship between physical activity level and days to recovery, while adjusting for 10 demographic and clinical variables., Results: Children participating in moderate-to-heavy activity at initial evaluation in concussion clinic averaged recovery 21 days quicker (95% confidence interval [CI] -27.1, -15.5, P < .001) than children who were engaging in none-to-light activity. This finding did not change when removing children who were deemed recovered at the first visit (who may have initiated physical activity after becoming asymptomatic)., Conclusions: These data add to growing evidence that progressive physical activity during recovery from concussion does not appear to be harmful. Physical activity represents a modifiable variable in recovery, and physicians can potentially expedite symptomatic recovery by recommending noncontact physical activity as tolerated during concussion recovery., (© 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.)

Studies of pediatric cardiac arrest use inconsistent outcomes, including return of spontaneous circulation and short-term survival, and basic assessments of functional and neurological status. In 2018, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation sponsored the COSCA initiative (Core Outcome Set After Cardiac Arrest) to improve consistency in reported outcomes of clinical trials of adult cardiac arrest survivors and supported this P-COSCA initiative (Pediatric COSCA). The P-COSCA Steering Committee generated a list of potential survival, life impact, and economic impact outcomes and assessment time points that were prioritized by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers, researchers, and parents/caregivers of children who survived cardiac arrest. Then expert panel discussions achieved consensus on the core outcomes, the methods to measure those core outcomes, and the timing of the measurements. The P-COSCA includes assessment of survival, brain function, cognitive function, physical function, and basic daily life skills. Survival and brain function are assessed at discharge or 30 days (or both if possible) and between 6 and 12 months after arrest. Cognitive function, physical function, and basic daily life skills are assessed between 6 and 12 months after cardiac arrest. Because many children have prearrest comorbidities, the P-COSCA also includes documentation of baseline (ie, prearrest) brain function and calculation of changes after cardiac arrest. Supplementary outcomes of survival, brain function, cognitive function, physical function, and basic daily life skills are assessed at 3 months and beyond 1 year after cardiac arrest if resources are available.

Objective: To describe the challenges related to COVID-19 affecting pediatric neuropsychologists practicing in inpatient brain injury rehabilitation settings, and offer solutions focused on face-to-face care and telehealth. Methods: A group of pediatric neuropsychologists from 12 pediatric rehabilitation units in North America and 2 in South America have met regularly since COVID-19 stay-at-home orders were initiated in many parts of the world. This group discussed challenges to clinical care and collaboratively problem-solvedsolutions. Results: Three primary challenges to usual care were identified, these include difficulty providing 1) neurobehavioral and cognitive assessments; 2) psychoeducation for caregivers and rapport building; and 3) return to academic instruction and home. Solutions during the pandemic for the first two areas focus on the varying service provision models that include 1) face-to-face care with personal protective equipment (PPE) and social distancing and 2) provision of care via remote methods, with a focus on telehealth. During the pandemic,neuropsychologists generally combine components of both the face-to-face and remote care models. Solutions to the final challenge focus on issues specific to returning to academic instruction and home after an inpatient stay. Conclusions: By considering components of in-person and telehealth models of patient care during the pandemic, neuropsychologists successfully serve patients within the rehabilitation setting, as well as the patient's family who may be limited in their ability to be physically present due to childcare, illness, work-related demands, or hospital restrictions.

This study examined the relationship between postconcussive symptom domain and school attendance. Retrospective chart review was completed for 88 children aged 6 to 18 years who were evaluated within 30 days postinjury. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to assess the association of physical, cognitive, emotional, and sleep symptoms with extent of school attendance. A subgroup multiple regression analysis was conducted to evaluate whether age affected the relationship of symptoms to school attendance. After controlling for demographic variables and total number of symptoms, a higher number of postconcussive sleep symptoms strongly predicted less school attendance. Specifically, older children (≥14 years old) with more sleep symptoms demonstrated less school attendance. For children presenting for specialty care after concussion, sleep symptoms are unfavorably associated with return to school. Future work aimed at optimizing sleep regulation following concussion may assist with early reengagement in school as recommended by current concussion management guidelines.

Background: Children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are reported to have persistent deficits in executive functioning and subtle motor functions Aim: This study examined the relationship between subtle motor signs and executive functioning in children with TBI Methods: Eighteen children aged 13-18 years with mild to severe TBI at least one year before study participation and 16 age-matched typically-developing controls were examined using the Revised Physical and Neurological Examination of Subtle Signs (PANESS), a simplified Go/No-go task, portions of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Verbal Fluency and Trail Making tests, and a Wechsler Coding test Results: There were significant associations between PANESS scores and executive functioning measures in children with TBI but not in controls. Conclusion: Results suggest that assessment of subtle motor signs may provide broader information regarding functioning after pediatric TBI.

Disrupted motor performance is increasingly recognized as a critical sequela of concussion which may have relevance for diagnosis and treatment. In 17 adolescents with recent concussion and 20 never-concussed controls, we evaluated the discriminant ability of a commonly used neurocognitive measure compared to a motor subtle sign exam, which evaluates gait, balance, and fine and gross motor control. We found that the motor subtle sign exam had better discriminant ability than the neurocognitive measure, but combining both measures was superior to analyses with individual measures (Wilks' ƛ = .297, p  < .001). This supports that there is an added benefit of evaluating motor control along with neurocognitive capacities after suspected concussion to enhance diagnosis and treatment of injury.

Objectives: To describe telephone interview completion rates among 12-month cardiac arrest survivors enrolled in the Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital trials, identify key characteristics of the completed follow-up interviews at both 3- and 12-month postcardiac arrest, and describe strategies implemented to promote follow-up., Setting: Centralized telephone follow-up interviews., Design: Retrospective report of data collected for Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest trials, and summary of strategies used to maximize follow-up completion., Patients: Twelve-month survivors (n = 251) from 39 Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest PICU sites in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom., Interventions: Not applicable., Measurements and Main Results: The 3- and 12-month telephone interviews included completion of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition data were available on 96% of 3-month survivors (242/251) and 95% of 12-month survivors (239/251) with no differences in demographics between those with and without completed Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition. At 12 months, a substantial minority of interviews were completed with caregivers other than parents (10%), after calls attempts were made on 6 or more days (18%), and during evenings/weekends (17%). Strategies included emphasizing the relationship between study teams and participants, ongoing communication between study team members across sites, promoting site engagement during the study's final year, and withholding payment for work associated with the primary outcome until work had been completed., Conclusions: It is feasible to use telephone follow-up interviews to successfully collect detailed neurobehavioral outcome about children following pediatric cardiac arrest. Future studies should consider availability of the telephone interviewer to conduct calls at times convenient for families, using a range of respondents, ongoing engagement with site teams, and site payment related to primary outcome completion.

Objective: The aim of the study was to characterize subtle motor signs in children with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury in the chronic phase of injury., Design: Fourteen children with moderate (n = 6) or severe (n = 8) traumatic brain injury, ages 11-18 yrs, who had sustained their injury at least 1-yr before study participation (range 1-14 yrs since injury), and 14 matched typically developing controls were examined using the Physical and Neurological Examination of Subtle Signs (PANESS). To examine the neural correlates of subtle motor signs, measures of total cerebral volume and motor/premotor volume were derived from magnetic resonance imaging., Results: Children with traumatic brain injury had significantly poorer PANESS performance than controls on the total timed subscore, proximal overflow, and the PANESS total score. Participants with severe traumatic brain injury had greater proximal overflow than those with moderate injury, after controlling for age at injury. Across all participants, greater proximal overflow correlated with reduced total cerebral volume, whereas within the traumatic brain injury group, reduced motor/premotor volume correlated with lower PANESS total score., Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of examining subtle motor signs including overflow during clinical evaluation of chronic pediatric traumatic brain injury and establishes the clinical utility of the PANESS as a measure sensitive to chronic subtle motor signs in this population., To Claim Cme Credits: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Define subtle motor signs including motor overflow; (2) Identify subtle motor signs such as motor overflow during clinical evaluation of children with brain injury; and (3) Explain the relevance of examining subtle motor signs in chronic pediatric brain injury during clinical evaluations., Level: Advanced., Accreditation: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Introduction: Children with disorders of consciousness (DOC) represent the highest end of the acquired brain injury (ABI) severity spectrum for survivors and experience a multitude of functional impairments. Current clinical management in DOC uses behavioural evaluation measures and interventions that fail to (1) describe the physiological consequences of ABI and (2) elicit functional gains. In paediatric DOC, there is a critical need to develop evidence-based interventions to promote recovery of basic responses to improve rehabilitation and aid decision-making for medical teams and caregivers. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the safety, tolerability and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in children with DOC., Methods and Analysis: This study is an open-label dose escalation trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and feasibility of tDCS in 10 children (5-17 years) receiving inpatient rehabilitation for DOC. This study will follow a modified rule-based design, allowing for intrapatient escalation, where a cohort of patients will be assigned to an initial tDCS current of 0.5 or 1 mA based on participant's head circumference and according to the safety data available in other paediatric populations. The subsequent assignment of increased current (1 or 2 mA) according to the prespecified rules will be based on the clinical observation of adverse events in the patients. The study will include up to three, 20 min sessions of anodal tDCS (sham, 0.5 or 1 mA, 1 or 2 mA) applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The primary outcomes are adverse events, pain associated with tDCS and intolerable disruption of inpatient care. Secondary outcomes are changes in electroencephalography (EEG) phase-locking and event-related potential components and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised total score from prestimulation to poststimulation., Ethics and Dissemination: The Johns Hopkins IRB (#IRB00174966) approved this study. Trial results will be disseminated through journals and conferences., Registration Number: NCT03618849., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To describe survival and 3-month and 12-month neurobehavioral outcomes in children with preexisting neurobehavioral impairment enrolled in one of two parallel randomized clinical trials of targeted temperature management., Design: Secondary analysis of Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital trials data., Setting: Forty-one PICUs in the United States, Canada, and United Kingdom., Patients: Eighty-four participants (59 in-hospital cardiac arrest and 25 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest), 49 males, 35 females, mean age 4.6 years (SD, 5.36 yr), with precardiac arrest neurobehavioral impairment (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition composite score < 70). All required chest compressions for greater than or equal to 2 minutes, were comatose and required mechanical ventilation after return of circulation., Interventions: Neurobehavioral function was assessed using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition at baseline (reflecting precardiac arrest status), and at 3 and 12 months postcardiac arrest, followed by on-site cognitive evaluation. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition norms are 100 (mean) ± 15 (SD); higher scores indicate better function. Analyses evaluated survival, changes in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, and cognitive functioning., Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight of 84 (33%) survived to 12 months (in-hospital cardiac arrest, 19/59 (32%); out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 9/25 [36%]). In-hospital cardiac arrest (but not out-of-hospital cardiac arrest) survival rate was significantly lower compared with the Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest group without precardiac arrest neurobehavioral impairment. Twenty-five survived with decrease in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition less than or equal to 15 (in-hospital cardiac arrest, 18/59 (31%); out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 7/25 [28%]). At 3-months postcardiac arrest, mean Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition scores declined significantly (-5; SD, 14; p < 0.05). At 12 months, Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition declined after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (-10; SD, 12; p < 0.05), but not in-hospital cardiac arrest (0; SD, 15); 43% (12/28) had unchanged or improved scores., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility, utility, and challenge of including this population in clinical neuroprotection trials. In children with preexisting neurobehavioral impairment, one-third survived to 12 months and their neurobehavioral outcomes varied broadly.

Aim: To inform design aspects of future trials by comparing 3 and 12-month neurobehavioural outcomes in children enrolled in Therapeutic Hypothermia After Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Out-Of-Hospital and In-Hospital (THAPCA-OH, THAPCA-IH) trials., Methods: The THAPCA trials evaluated two targeted temperature management interventions (hypothermia, 32.0-34.0 °C; normothermia, 36.0-37.5 °C). Children, aged 2 days to <18 years, were enrolled from 2009-2015. Three and 12-month post-cardiac arrest (CA) outcomes included the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) (population mean = 100, SD = 15) and the pediatric cerebral performance category (PCPC) scale. Children without significant pre-existing neurodevelopmental deficits were included in primary outcome analyses. Among survivors, favorable 12-month outcome was defined as VABS-II ≥ 70., Results: VABS-II and PCPC were available at 3 and 12 months in 204 of 222 eligible survivors (THAPCA-OH, n = 82; THAPCA-IH, n = 122). Relative to THAPCA-IH, THAPCA-OH had significantly less pre-CA disability and significantly greater 12-month CA impairment, based on both VABS-II and PCPC. Correlations between 3 and 12-month VABS-II scores were strong for THAPCA-OH (r = 0.95) and THAPCA-IH (r = 0.72), and lower (p ≤ 0.001) in THAPCA-IH. Between time-points correlations were lower, but still significant in children <1 year at CA (p < 0.001). In both cohorts, 3-month VABS-II and PCPC categorical outcomes had high sensitivity (≥70%) for predicting favorable 12-month VABS-II outcomes, but specificity was lower for THAPCA-IH (68-89%) relative to THAPCA-OH (≥95%). Overall, 12-month diagnostic accuracy was ≥80% for both VABS-II and PCPC in both cohorts., Conclusions: In future paediatric cardiac arrest clinical trials that enroll similar cohorts, integration of 3-month neurobehavioral outcome measures should be considered., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe one-year cognitive and neurologic outcomes among extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) survivors enrolled in the Therapeutic Hypothermia after Paediatric Cardiac Arrest In-Hospital (THAPCA-IH) trial; and compare outcomes between survivors who received ECPR, later extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or no ECMO., Methods: All children recruited to THAPCA-IH were comatose post-arrest. Neurobehavioral function was assessed by caregivers using the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales, 2nd edition (VABS-II) at pre-arrest baseline and 12 months post-arrest. Age-appropriate cognitive performance measures (Mullen Scales of Early Learning or Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence) and neurologic examinations were obtained 12 months post-arrest. VABS-II and cognitive performance measures were transformed to standard scores (mean = 100, SD = 15) with higher scores representing better performance. Only children with broadly normal pre-arrest function (VABS-II ≥70) were included in this analysis., Results: One-year follow-up was attained for 127 survivors with pre-arrest VABS-II ≥70. Of these, 57 received ECPR, 14 received ECMO later in their course, and 56 did not receive ECMO. VABS-II assessments were completed at 12 months for 55 (96.5%) ECPR survivors, cognitive testing for 44 (77.2%) and neurologic examination for 47 (82.5%). At 12 months, 39 (70.9%) ECPR survivors had VABS-II scores ≥70. On cognitive testing, 24 (54.6%) had scores ≥70, and on neurologic examination, 28 (59.5%) had no/minimal to mild impairment. Cognitive and neurologic score distributions were similar between ECPR, later ECMO and no ECMO groups., Conclusions: Many ECPR survivors had favourable outcomes although impairments were common. ECPR survivors had similar outcomes to other survivors who were initially comatose post-arrest., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited data exist about neurobehavioral outcomes of children treated with open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Our objective was to describe neurobehavioral outcomes 1 year after arrest among children who received open-chest CPR during in-hospital cardiac arrest and to explore factors associated with 1-year survival and survival with good neurobehavioral outcome., Methods: The study is a secondary analysis of the Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest In-Hospital Trial. Fifty-six children who received open-chest CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest were included. Neurobehavioral status was assessed using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at baseline before arrest and 12 months after arrest. Norms for VABS-II are 100 ± 15 points. Outcomes included 12-month survival, 12-month survival with VABS-II decreased by no more than 15 points from baseline, and 12-month survival with VABS-II of 70 or more points., Results: Of 56 children receiving open-chest CPR, 49 (88%) were after cardiac surgery and 43 (77%) were younger than 1 year. Forty-four children (79%) were cannulated for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during CPR or within 6 hours of return of spontaneous circulation. Thirty-three children (59%) survived to 12 months, 22 (41%) survived to 12 months with VABS-II decreased by no more than 15 points from baseline, and of the children with baseline VABS-II of 70 or more points 23 (51%) survived to 12 months with VABS-II of 70 or more points. On multivariable analyses, use of ECMO, renal replacement therapy, and higher maximum international normalized ratio were independently associated with lower 12-month survival with VABS-II of 70 or more points., Conclusions: Approximately one-half of children survived with good neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after open-chest CPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Use of ECMO and postarrest renal or hepatic dysfunction may be associated with worse neurobehavioral outcomes., (Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To systematically examine the safety and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) interventions in pediatric motor disorders., Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched from inception to August 2018., Study Selection: tDCS randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, conference proceedings, and dissertations in pediatric motor disorders were included. Two authors independently screened articles based on predefined inclusion criteria., Data Extraction: Data related to participant demographics, intervention, and outcomes were extracted by 2 authors. Quality assessment was independently performed by 2 authors., Data Synthesis: A total of 23 studies involving a total of 391 participants were included. There was no difference in dropout rates between active (1 of 144) and sham (1 of 144) tDCS groups, risk difference 0.0, 95% confidence interval (-.05 to .04). Across studies, the most common adverse effects in the active group were tingling (17.2%), discomfort (8.02%), itching (6.79%), and skin redness (4%). Across 3 studies in children with cerebral palsy, tDCS significantly improved gait velocity (MD=.23; 95% confidence interval [0.13-0.34]; P<.0005), stride length (MD=0.10; 95% confidence interval [0.05-0.15]; P<.0005), and cadence (MD=15.7; 95% confidence interval [9.72-21.68]; P<.0005). Mixed effects were found on balance, upper extremity function, and overflow movements in dystonia., Conclusion: Based on the studies reviewed, tDCS is a safe technique in pediatric motor disorders and may improve some gait measures and involuntary movements. Research to date in pediatric motor disorders shows limited effectiveness in improving balance and upper extremity function. tDCS may serve as a potential adjunct to pediatric rehabilitation; to better understand if tDCS is beneficial for pediatric motor disorders, more well-designed RCTs are needed., (Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe neurobehavioral outcomes and investigate factors associated with survival and survival with good neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after in-hospital cardiac arrest for children who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation., Design: Secondary analysis of the Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest In-Hospital trial., Setting: Thirty-seven PICUs in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom., Patients: Children (n = 147) resuscitated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation following in-hospital cardiac arrest., Interventions: Neurobehavioral status was assessed using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, at prearrest baseline and 12 months postarrest. Norms for Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, are 100 (mean) ± 15 (SD). Higher scores indicate better functioning. Outcomes included 12-month survival, 12-month survival with Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, decreased by less than or equal to 15 points from baseline, and 12-month survival with Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, greater than or equal to 70., Measurements and Main Results: Of 147 children receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 125 (85.0%) had a preexisting cardiac condition, 75 (51.0%) were postcardiac surgery, and 84 (57.1%) were less than 1 year old. Duration of chest compressions was greater than 30 minutes for 114 (77.5%). Sixty-one (41.5%) survived to 12 months, 32 (22.1%) survived to 12 months with Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, decreased by less than or equal to 15 points from baseline, and 39 (30.5%) survived to 12 months with Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, greater than or equal to 70. On multivariable analyses, open-chest cardiac massage was independently associated with greater 12-month survival with Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, decreased by less than or equal to 15 points and greater 12-month survival with Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, greater than or equal to 70. Higher minimum postarrest lactate and preexisting gastrointestinal conditions were independently associated with lower 12-month survival with Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, decreased by less than or equal to 15 points and lower 12-month survival with Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition, greater than or equal to 70., Conclusions: About one third of children survived with good neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital arrest. Open-chest cardiac massage and minimum postarrest lactate were associated with survival with good neurobehavioral outcome at 1 year.