Search

Objectives To explore health behavior profiles of AI/AN youth involved in native students together against negative decisions (STAND), a national culture-based curriculum. Methods We analyzed data from 1236 surveys conducted among AI/AN youth at 40 native STAND implementation sites located in 16 states throughout the US from 2014 to 2017. Health profiles included demographics, sexual orientation, sexual activity, STI testing, cigarette use, and suicide attempts in the past 12-months. We used t-tests and chi square tests of independence to compare risk behavior prevalence among the sample. Results Health behavior profiles of AI/AN youth indicate that 45.6% of youth did not use condoms the last time they had sex, and 82.7% have never been tested for STIs. Differences in cigarette smoking were observed in questioning youth (questioning: 80.3%, straight/heterosexual: 63.8%, LGBTQ2S + : 49.9%, p = 0.03). Conclusions for Practice Health behaviors related to sex, substance, violence and self-harm, are at least as common for AI/AN youth as those observed in other US teens. Future research should consider similarities and differences in health profiles of AI/AN youth when designing interventions that affect them. Further, our findings underscore the need for culturally-relevant curricula like native STAND, not because their health behavior is different, but because their socio-ecologic environment is different., Author(s): Megan Skye [sup.1] , Stephanie Craig [sup.2] , Caitlin Donald [sup.1] , Allyson Kelley [sup.3] , Brittany Morgan [sup.1] , Kavita Rajani [sup.1] , Michelle Singer [sup.2] , Tosha [...]

Culturally-adapted evidence-based programs (EBPs) are needed to promote healthy behaviors among Native teens and young adults. Little is known about the facilitators and barriers of implementing and sustaining EBPs in Native communities. This paper aims to identify those factors described by educators who implemented the Native Students Together Against Negative Decisions (STAND) curriculum. Methods. We conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 44 Native STAND educators from 48 sites throughout the United States. We used a modified grounded theory approach to explore barriers, facilitators, and sustainability factors related to implementing Native STAND. Results. We learned that disruptions to staffing, coordination, and organizational factors were the most common barriers. Factors that improved implementation success included: tailoring the program to local needs/constraints, having a supportive Project Manager, improved fidelity due to check-in calls, and participation in summer training. Factors that improved sustainability included: access to needed infrastructure, administrative support, community support, and student interest. Discussion. The delivery of Native STAND was further improved by person-to-person communication and resource sharing across sites. Sustaining EBPs in AI/AN settings requires culturally-tailored technical assistance, sufficient implementation funds for materials and staffing, and a community of peer educators to inspire forward progress. Conclusion. EBPs that reflect the needs and experiences of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth are necessary to address systemic inequities in adolescent health outcomes. The Native STAND Dissemination and Implementation study is among the first to assess facilitators and barriers to program delivery in diverse AI/AN settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinicians typically estimate heart failure health status using the New York Heart Association Class, which is often discordant with patient-reported health status. It is unknown whether collecting patient-reported health status improves the accuracy of clinician assessments. Methods: The PRO-HF trial (Patient-Reported Outcomes in Heart Failure Clinic) is a randomized, nonblinded trial evaluating routine Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) collection in heart failure clinic. Patients with a scheduled visit to Stanford heart failure clinic between August 30, 2021 and June 30, 2022 were enrolled and randomized to KCCQ-12 assessment or usual care. In this prespecified substudy, we evaluated whether access to the KCCQ-12 improved the accuracy of clinicians' New York Heart Association assessment or patients' perspectives on their clinician interaction. We surveyed clinicians regarding their patients' New York Heart Association Class, quality of life, and symptom frequency. Clinician responses were compared with patients' KCCQ-12 responses. We surveyed patients regarding their clinician interactions. Results: Of the 1248 enrolled patients, 1051 (84.2%) attended a visit during the substudy. KCCQ-12 results were given to the clinicians treating the 528 patients in the KCCQ-12 arm; the 523 patients in the usual care arm completed the KCCQ-12 without the results being shared. The correlation between New York Heart Association Class and KCCQ-12 Overall Summary Score was stronger when clinicians had access to the KCCQ-12 (r=−0.73 versus r=−0.61, P <0.001). More patients in the KCCQ-12 arm strongly agreed that their clinician understood their symptoms (95.2% versus 89.7% of respondents [odds ratio‚ 2.27; 95% CI‚ 1.32–3.87]). However, patients in both arms reported similar quality of clinician communication and therapeutic alliance. Conclusions: Collecting the KCCQ-12 in heart failure clinic improved clinicians' accuracy of health status assessment; correspondingly, patients believed their clinicians better understood their symptoms. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04164004. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Guidelines recommend timely follow-up with a cardiology specialist for patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF), but it is unknown whether the timeliness of specialty cardiovascular care post-discharge correlates with clinical risk., Objective: Assess the association between estimated mortality risk and post-HF hospitalization cardiology follow-up., Methods: In a cohort of Veterans hospitalized with HF in acute care VA hospitals between 1/1/2018 and 9/15/2022, we estimated the association of mortality risk at discharge with post-discharge cardiology encounters via logistic regression. We also evaluated the association between cardiology visits and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and described variability in post-discharge follow-up rates across VA facilities., Results: We identified a cohort of 84,348 Veterans hospitalized with HF with 120,619 hospital admissions. Of a sub-cohort of 57,554 Veterans with 79,866 hospitalizations surviving at least one year after discharge, 32.1% of hospitalizations were followed by a cardiology visit within two weeks, and 49.3% within one month. Marginal probabilities of two-week and one-month follow-up were higher for hospitalizations in the highest-risk quintile than those in the lowest-risk quintile (34% vs. 30% and 51% vs. 47%, respectively; p<0.001 for both intervals). In a time-to-event model in the full cohort, there was a slightly negative association between risk and likelihood of one-month follow-up (coefficient for MAGGIC score = -0.004, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.005 - -0.003). Black Veterans were less likely to have either two-week or one-month follow-up (adjusted odds ratios 0.93 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.97] for two weeks and 0.93 [95% CI 0.89-0.96] for one month). Female Veterans were also less likely to have follow-up within one month of hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio 0.90 [95% CI 0.90-0.98]). Conversely, patients with a primary versus secondary hospital diagnosis of HF and those with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction were more likely to have two-week follow-up (adjusted odds ratios 1.67 [95% CI 1.62-1.73] and 1.72 [95% CI 1.67-1.78], respectively) and one-month follow-up (adjusted odds ratios 1.83 [95% CI 1.78-1.88] and 1.85 [95% CI 1.80-1.90], respectively). One-month follow-up rates varied from 5% to 69% across VA facilities., Conclusions: The rate of visits with a cardiologist within two weeks or one month following HF hospitalization was low overall, was at most modestly associated with estimated mortality risk at discharge, and varied by sex, race/ethnicity, and across VA facilities. Increasing visit rate after HF hospitalization should be evaluated as a mechanism to improve outcomes after HF hospitalizations, particularly for higher-risk individuals., (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The Emergency Medicaid program offers restricted Medicaid benefits for people who meet the same financial eligibility criteria as Traditional Medicaid recipients but do not meet the citizenship requirements for enrollment in Traditional Medicaid. By federal law, Emergency Medicaid covers care for life-threatening emergencies or a hospital admission for childbirth. No prenatal or postpartum care is covered. Most of the women enrolled in Emergency Medicaid are Latina., Objective: We assessed postpartum visits and receipt of postpartum contraception and compared the outcomes for Emergency (restricted benefit) Medicaid recipients with those of Traditional (full-benefit) Medicaid recipients in Oregon and South Carolina, 2 states with similar-sized immigrant populations., Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Medicaid claims and birth certificate data of live births covered by Medicaid (Traditional and Emergency) between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2017, in Oregon and South Carolina. Our analysis was at the individual level. Primary outcomes were postpartum visit attendance and receipt of postpartum contraception within 2 months. We examined differences in demographic and delivery characteristics by Medicaid type. If women received postpartum contraception, we compared the timing of receipt (immediate postpartum, ≤1 month, 1-2 months, and 2-6 months after delivery) by the type of Medicaid. Among women using contraception, we described the type of contraceptive received at each time point, stratified by Medicaid type. Associations between Medicaid type (Traditional vs Emergency) and postpartum visit attendance and contraception use were assessed using adjusted absolute predicted probabilities from logistic regression models. We ran models for the entire cohort and conducted a subanalysis restricted to only Latina women., Results: Our study included 375,544 live births to 288,234 women, with 12.7% of births among Emergency Medicaid recipients. Women enrolled in Emergency Medicaid tended to be older (age >35 years; 18.1% vs 7.2%; P <.001) and were more likely to be multiparous (76.8% vs 60.8%; P <.001) and Latina (80.3% vs 9.5%; P <.001) than their Traditional Medicaid peers. Among women enrolled in Emergency Medicaid, the probability of having a postpartum visit was 6.1% (95% confidence interval, 5.9-6.4) compared with 58.8% (95% confidence interval, 58.6-58.9) for women covered by Traditional Medicaid. After 6 months following delivery, 97.6% of Emergency Medicaid recipients had no evidence of contraceptive use compared with 55.6% of Traditional Medicaid enrollees ( P <.001). In our adjusted model, Emergency Medicaid recipients were also significantly less likely to receive postpartum contraception than Traditional Medicaid enrollees (1.9% vs 35.5%; 95% confidence interval, [1.8-2.1] vs [35.4-35.7]). We examined the role that race may play in postpartum contraceptive use by conducting a subanalysis restricted to Latina women only.Latinas with births covered by Emergency Medicaid had a 1.9% (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.0) adjusted probability of postpartum contraception use within 2 months compared with 39.8% (95% confidence interval, 38.7-39.9) among Latinas enrolled in Traditional Medicaid., Conclusion: Women enrolled in Emergency Medicaid experience large disparities in postpartum care and contraceptive use. Policies that restrict Medicaid coverage following delivery exacerbate inequities in postpartum care, potentially leading to worse health outcomes for low-income immigrants and their children., (© 2021 The Authors.)