Search

Background: Fascicular heart blocks can progress to complete heart blocks, but this risk has not been evaluated in a large general population. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between various types of fascicular blocks diagnosed by electrocardiographic (ECG) readings and the risk of incident higher degree atrioventricular block (AVB), syncope, pacemaker implantation, and death. Methods: We studied primary care patients referred for ECG recording between 2001 and 2015. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) as well as absolute risks of cardiovascular outcomes. Results: Of 358,958 primary care patients (median age 54 years; 55% women), 13,636 (3.8%) had any type of fascicular block. Patients were followed up to 15.9 years. We found increasing HRs of incident syncope, pacemaker implantation, and third-degree AVB with increasing complexity of fascicular block. Compared with no block, isolated left anterior fascicular block (LAFB) was associated with 0%–2% increased 10-year risk of developing third-degree AVB (HR 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25–2.05), whereas right bundle branch block combined with LAFB and first-degree AVB was associated with up to 23% increased 10-year risk (HR 11.0; 95% CI 7.7–15.7), depending on age and sex group. Except for left posterior fascicular block (HR 2.09; 95% CI 1.87–2.32), we did not find any relevant associations between fascicular block and death. Conclusion: We found that higher degrees of fascicular blocks were associated with increasing risk of syncope, pacemaker implantation, and complete heart block, but the association with death was negligible.

Objectives Electrocardiographic bundle branch block (BBB) is common but the prognostic implications in primary care are unclear. We sought to investigate the relationship between electrocardiographic BBB subtypes and the risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in a primary care population free of major CV disease. Methods Retrospective cohort study of primary care patients referred for electrocardiogram (ECG) recording between 2001 and 2011. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) as well as absolute risks of CV outcomes based on various BBB subtypes. Results We included 202 268 individuals with a median follow-up period of 7.8 years (Inter-quartile range [IQR] 4.9-10.6). Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was associated with heart failure (HF) in both men (HR 3.96, 95% CI 3.30 to 4.76) and women (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.15 to 2.94) and with CV death in men (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.35). Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was associated with pacemaker implantation in both men (HR 3.26, 95% CI 2.74 to 3.89) and women (HR 3.69, 95% CI 2.91 to 4.67), HF in both sexes and weakly associated with CV death in men. Regarding LBBB, we found an increasing hazard of HF with increasing QRS-interval duration (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42 per 10 ms increase in men and HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.40 per 10 ms increase in women). Absolute 10-year risk predictions across age-specific and sex-specific subgroups revealed clinically relevant differences between having various BBB subtypes. Conclusions Opportunistic findings of BBB subtypes in primary care patients without major CV disease should be considered warnings of future HF and pacemaker implantation

Background Because of ambiguous reports in the literature, we aimed to investigate the association between PR interval and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, heart failure, and pacemaker implantation, allowing for a nonlinear relationship. MethodsWe included 293,111 individuals, corresponding to one-third of the population in the greater region of Copenhagen. These individuals had a digital electrocardiogram recorded in a general practitioner's core facility from 2001-2011. Data on drug use, comorbidities, and outcomes were collected from Danish registries. We divided the population into 7 groups based on the population PR interval distribution. Cox models were used, with reference to a PR interval between 152 and 161 ms (40th to < 60th percentile). ResultsDuring follow-up, we identified 34,783 deaths from all causes, 9867 cardiovascular deaths, 9526 cases of incident heart failure, and 1805 pacemaker implantations. A short PR interval ( < 125 ms; hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] , 1.08-1.41; P = 0.001) as well as a long PR interval ( > 200 ms; HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.32; P < 0.001) was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death after multivariable adjustment. A long PR interval conferred an increased risk of heart failure ( > 200 ms; HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.42; P < 0.001). An increasing PR interval conferred an increased risk of pacemaker implantation, in a dose-response manner, with the highest risk associated with a PR interval > 200 ms (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 2.96-4.11; P < 0.001). Conclusions PR interval was significantly associated with the risk of the adverse outcomes investigated. The nonlinear relationships, in combination with relatively weak associations, could contribute to previously reported conflicting results on the subject.