Search

The objective of the present analysis was to determine whether changes in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) average pain scores by patient global impression of improvement (PGI‐I) category and the cut‐off for clinically important difference (CID) were different between Asian and Caucasian patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis. This analysis used data from 3 (Caucasian) and 2 (Asian) randomized, placebo‐controlled, 10‐ to 14‐week duloxetine studies for the treatment of patients ≥40 years of age with osteoarthritis pain. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to characterize the association between changes in BPI average pain scores and PGI‐I levels at study endpoint. The CID was characterized by PGI‐I, and the cut‐off point for CID in BPI average pain scores was determined by the intersection of a 45‐degree tangent line with each ROC curve. Data from 668 Asian and 868 Caucasian patients were available for analysis. Baseline BPI average pain ratings including worst and least pain were comparable between Asians and Caucasians. Ratings for percentage change from baseline to endpoint for BPI average pain scores in Asian patients and Caucasian patients were similar across the 7 PGI‐I categories, regardless of age, gender, study, and treatment. The ROC analysis results of cut‐off points in BPI average pain scores demonstrated the raw change cut‐off was −3.0, and percentage change cut‐off was −40% for both Asian and Caucasian patients. Overall, the present analysis concludes changes in BPI average pain scores by PGI‐I category and the cut‐off for CID were similar for Asian and Caucasian patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: ACU193 is a humanized IgG2 subclass monoclonal antibody targeting soluble amyloid‐beta oligomers (sAβOs). Growing evidence supports the view that sAβOs may be the most toxic and pathogenic form of Aβ relative to Aβ monomers and amyloid plaques and are one of the primary drivers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) neurodegeneration. Thus, blocking the toxicity of sAβOs with ACU193 is a promising approach for treating AD. Method: INTERCEPT‐AD is a phase 1 randomized, placebo‐controlled, single‐ and multiple‐ ascending dose (SAD/MAD) study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous ACU193 in participants with early AD, i.e., mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to AD. Key inclusion criteria are 55‐90 years of age, confirmation of amyloid pathology with a PET scan, MMSE score of 18‐30, and CDR‐Global score (CDR‐GS) of 0.5 or 1.0. The MAD portion of the study includes three administrations of ACU193 at doses of 10, 25, or 60 mg/kg. In addition to standard safety measures, MRI is assessed periodically. Cerebrospinal fluid is collected to assess PK and evidence of target engagement. The study also includes exploratory measures such as standard cognitive and functional assessments, a computerized cognitive test battery, measures of cerebral blood flow via arterial spin labeling on MRI, and various plasma biomarkers. Result: Sixty‐five participants from 17 U.S. study sites were randomized to INTERCEPT‐AD, with 53% female and baseline age of 72.1 ± 7.8 years (mean ± SD). The baseline MMSE was 24.2 ± 3.6, CDR‐GS was 0.64 ± 0.27, and CDR‐Sum of Boxes was 3.5 ± 1.8. In addition to baseline characteristics, the presentation will provide topline safety results, frequency of amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), PK assessments, and evidence of target engagement. Some exploratory measures including cognitive and functional assessments, computerized cognitive testing, and endpoint florbetapir PET results will also be presented. Conclusion: We will present topline results, along with key baseline demographic, clinical, and cognitive characteristics of participants in the INTERCEPT‐AD trial. The data generated from this trial will guide further development of ACU193 in a subsequent trial to test the novel mechanism of action of ACU193 in the treatment of early AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Safety findings from a Phase 2b study of galcanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide, for prevention of migraine (NCT02163993) are reported here. Methods Patients aged 18-65 years with episodic migraine were evaluated in this multicenter, double-blind, randomized study. After randomization, 410 patients were administered 5, 50, 120 or 300 mg of galcanezumab or placebo subcutaneously once every 4 weeks for 12 weeks, followed by a post-treatment off-drug period lasting 12 weeks. Results Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were primarily rated as mild to moderate. Serious adverse events reported in galcanezumab dose groups were appendicitis, Crohn's disease, suicidal ideation, and congenital ankyloglossia in an infant of a paternal pregnancy; each of these were reported by one patient. Adverse events leading to discontinuation with galcanezumab treatment were abdominal pain, visual impairment, and upper limb fracture, each reported by one patient. Treatment-emergent injection-site reactions were reported significantly more frequently ( p = 0.013) with galcanezumab (13.9%) than with placebo (5.8%). Injection-site pain was the most common injection-site reaction (galcanezumab 11.4%; placebo 2.9%, p = 0.004). Upper respiratory tract infection (galcanezumab 10.0%; placebo 8.8%) and nasopharyngitis (galcanezumab 7.0%; placebo 2.2%) also occurred more frequently with galcanezumab treatment. Potential hypersensitivity events were reported at similar frequencies in galcanezumab (3.3%) and placebo (5.1%) groups. Incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies in galcanezumab dose groups (4.6% of patients during treatment period) did not appear to have any meaningful effects on safety, the pharmacokinetics of galcanezumab, or its ability to bind to the target ligand. Conclusion The results from this 3-month Phase 2b study support the initiation of larger Phase 3 trials of longer duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Monoclonal antibodies are being investigated for chronic pain to overcome the shortcomings of current treatment options. Objective: To provide a practical overview of monoclonal antibodies in clinical development for use in chronic pain conditions, with a focus on mechanisms of action and relevance to specific classes. Methods: Qualitative review using a systematic strategy to search for randomized controlled trials, systematic and nonsystematic (narrative) reviews, observational studies, nonclinical studies, and case reports for inclusion. Studies were identified via relevant search terms using an electronic search of MEDLINE via PubMed (1990 to June 2017) in addition to hand-searching reference lists of retrieved systematic and nonsystematic reviews. Results: Monoclonal antibodies targeting nerve growth factor, calcitonin gene-related peptide pathways, various ion channels, tumor necrosis factor-a, and epidermal growth factor receptor are in different stages of development. Mechanisms of action are dependent on specific signaling pathways, which commonly involve those related to peripheral neurogenic inflammation. In clinical studies, there has been a mixed response to different monoclonal antibodies in several chronic pain conditions, including migraine, neuropathic pain conditions (e.g., diabetic peripheral neuropathy), osteoarthritis, chronic back pain, ankylosing spondylitis, and cancer. Adverse events observed to date have generally been mild, although further studies are needed to ensure safety of monoclonal antibodies in early stages of development, especially where there is an overlap with non-pain-related pathways. High acquisition cost remains another treatment limitation. Conclusion: Monoclonal antibodies for chronic pain have the potential to overcome the limitations of current treatment options, but strategies to ensure their appropriate use need to be determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]