Search

Objective: In the primary analysis of the phase 2b VESTA study, oral fezolinetant reduced frequency and severity of menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) compared with placebo. This secondary analysis evaluates effects of fezolinetant on responder rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs)., Methods: In this 12-week, double-blind study, postmenopausal women with moderate/severe VMS were randomized to fezolinetant 15, 30, 60, or 90 mg BID or 30, 60, or 120 mg QD or placebo. Proportion of responders was based on reductions in VMS from daily diary records. P values for comparisons between active treatment and placebo were calculated using logistic regression. Changes from baseline in PROs (Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire, Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale, Greene Climacteric Scale) were conducted using a mixed model for repeated measurements and compared post hoc with published minimally important differences (MIDs)., Results: Of 356 women randomized, 352 were treated and analyzed. A greater proportion of women receiving fezolinetant versus placebo met definitions of response at week 12. For all doses, mean changes from baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire VMS scores exceeded the MID (1.2) at weeks 4 (placebo: -1.8; fezolinetant: range, -1.9 to -3.6) and 12 (placebo: -2.3; fezolinetant: range, -2.9 to -4.4). Mean changes in Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale at weeks 4 (placebo: -2.2; fezolinetant: range, -2.5 to -3.8) and 12 (placebo: -2.9; fezolinetant: range, -3.3 to -4.3) exceeded the MID (1.76). Greene Climacteric Scale-VMS domain scores improved for most fezolinetant doses versus placebo (week 4, placebo: -1.7; fezolinetant: range, -2.1 to -3.3; week 12, placebo: -2.1; fezolinetant: range, -2.7 to -3.6)., Conclusions: Oral fezolinetant was associated with higher responder rates than placebo and larger improvements in QoL and other PRO measures, including a reduction in VMS-related interference with daily life.

Objective: Menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) may result from altered thermoregulatory control in brain regions innervated by neurokinin 3 receptor-expressing neurons. This phase 2b study evaluated seven dosing regimens of fezolinetant, a selective neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist, as a nonhormone approach for the treatment of VMS., Methods: Menopausal women aged >40-65 years with moderate/severe VMS (≥50 episodes/wk) were randomized (double-blind) to fezolinetant 15, 30, 60, 90 mg BID or 30, 60, 120 mg QD, or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were reduction in moderate/severe VMS frequency and severity ([number of moderate VMS × 2] + [number of severe VMS × 3]/total daily moderate/severe VMS) at weeks 4 and 12. Response (≥50% reduction in moderate/severe VMS frequency) was a key secondary outcome., Results: Of 352 treated participants, 287 completed the study. Fezolinetant reduced moderate/severe VMS frequency by -1.9 to -3.5/day at week 4 and -1.8 to -2.6/day at week 12 (all P < 0.05 vs placebo). Mean difference from placebo in VMS severity score was -0.4 to -1 at week 4 (all doses P < 0.05) and -0.2 to -0.6 at week 12 (P < 0.05 for 60 and 90 mg BID and 60 mg QD). Response (50% reduction) relative to placebo was achieved by 81.4% to 94.7% versus 58.5% of participants at end of treatment (all doses P < 0.05). Treatment-emergent adverse events were largely mild/moderate; no serious treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred., Conclusions: Fezolinetant is a well-tolerated, effective nonhormone therapy that rapidly reduces moderate/severe menopausal VMS. : Video Summary:http://links.lww.com/MENO/A572; video script available at http://links.lww.com/MENO/A573.

Study Question: Does the GnRH antagonist, ASP1707, reduce endometriosis-associated pelvic pain?, Summary Answer: ASP1707 significantly reduced endometriosis-associated pelvic pain in a dose-related manner., What Is Known Already: GnRH agonists are an effective therapeutic option for endometriosis that is refractory to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral contraceptives, and progestins. However, GnRH agonists cause complete suppression of estradiol (E2), resulting in hypoestrogenic side-effects such as bone loss that may increase the future risk of osteoporotic fractures., Study Design, Size, Duration: This was a Phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study conducted in 540 women from 04 December 2012 to 30 July 2015 in Europe and Japan. A sample size of 504 (84 subjects per group) was calculated to provide ≥80% power to detect a dose-related treatment effect among placebo and ASP1707 doses in change from baseline in pelvic pain, assuming different dose-response curves after 12 weeks of treatment., Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Of 912 women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain screened, 540 were enrolled, and 532 received ≥1 dose of study drug (placebo, n = 88; ASP1707 3 mg, n = 86; ASP1707 5 mg, n = 91; ASP1707 10 mg, n = 90; ASP1707 15 mg, n = 88; leuprorelin, n = 89) for 24 weeks., Main Results and the Role of Chance: After 12 weeks of treatment with ASP1707, the mean (95% CI) changes in numeric rating score (NRS) for overall pelvic pain (OPP) were -1.56 (-1.91, -1.21), -1.63 (-1.99, -1.27), -1.93 (-2.27, -1.60), -2.29 (-2.64, -1.94), and -2.13 (-2.47, -1.79) for placebo, ASP1707 3 mg, ASP1707 5 mg, ASP1707 10 mg, and ASP1707 15 mg, respectively. Mean (95% CI) changes in NRS for dysmenorrhea were -1.50 (-2.00, -1.00), -2.72 (-3.22, -2.21), -2.85 (-3.33, -2.38), -3.97 (-4.46, -3.48), and -4.18 (-4.66, -3.70), respectively. Mean (95% CI) changes in NRS for non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) were -1.53 (-1.88, -1.19), -1.51 (-1.87, -1.16), -1.80 (-2.14, -1.47), -2.03 (-2.37, -1.68), and -1.86 (-2.20, -1.52), respectively. Statistically significant dose-related treatment effects in reduction in NRS for OPP (P = 0.001), dysmenorrhea (P < 0.001), and NMPP (P = 0.029) were observed after 12 weeks among ASP1707 doses and were maintained through 24 weeks. Serum estradiol and bone mineral density decreased dose dependently with ASP1707 through 24 weeks, however, to a lesser extent than with leuprorelin., Limitations, Reason for Caution: This study was not powered for pairwise comparison of each ASP1707 group versus placebo., Wider Implications of the Findings: All doses of ASP1707 reduced serum E2 levels to within the target range and to a lesser extent than leuprorelin. ASP1707 is a potential alternative treatment to leuprorelin for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain with lower impact on bone health., Study Funding/competing Interest(s): This study was funded by Astellas Pharma Inc. T.D'.H is Vice President and Head of Global Medical Affairs Fertility at Merck, Darmstadt, Germany since October 1, 2015. At the time that the TERRA study was conducted, he served as Principal Investigator in his role as Coordinator of the Leuven University Fertility Center. Since October 2015, T.D'.H has left Leuven University Hospital Gasthuisberg, but continues to serve as Professor in Reproductive Medicine and Biology at KU Leuven (University of Leuven) Belgium and at the Dept of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction at Yale University, New Haven, USA. T. Fukaya and Y. Osuga report personal consulting fees from Astellas Pharma Inc. during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. G.M. Holtkamp, and L. Skillern are employed by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.; K. Miyazaki is employed by Astellas Pharma Inc.; B. López, was a biostatistician for Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. during conduct of the study; R. Besuyen was a contract Associate Director of Medical Science for Astellas during conduct of the study., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01767090. EudraCT number 2012-002791-14., Trial Registration Date: 18 December 2012., Date of First Subject’s Enrollment: One subject signed informed consent on 04 December 2012; the first subject was randomized on 16 April 2013., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.)

Objective: To determine if the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil citrate improves endothelial-dependent relaxation of small arteries from women with preeclampsia., Methods: Myometrial and omental biopsies were taken from women participating in a randomized placebo-controlled trial using sildenafil citrate in women with preeclampsia. Vasoconstriction and endothelial-dependent relaxation of small arteries was measured utilizing wire myography., Results: Vasoconstriction and endothelial-dependent relaxation of myometrial and omental arteries were not altered in women taking sildenafil., Conclusion: Acute effects may have been lost as sildenafil administration occurred many hours prior to myography. Plasma sildenafil levels may have been lower than required for vascular response.

Objective: To determine if the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor sildenafil prolongs pregnancy in women with preeclampsia., Methods: Women with preeclampsia at gestational ages 24-34 weeks were recruited from nine hospitals in the UK, and randomly assigned to sildenafil citrate or placebo. Medication was increased every 3 days from 20 mg three times daily (tid), to 40 mg, and 80 mg tid. The primary endpoint was prolongation of pregnancy from randomisation to delivery (days). Secondary endpoints were markers of maternal disease and cord pH at delivery and infant weight. Details of all adverse events were also collected. Plasma samples were taken to establish pharmacokinetic information. Data analysed on a modified intention to treat analysis. The study had a power of >95% to detect a difference of 5 days., Results: Of 35 women, 17 were allocated to sildenafil and 18 to placebo. There was no difference in time from randomisation to delivery in the two treatment groups, with a median time of 4 days (range 1-15) in the sildenafil group and 4.5 days (range 1-30) in the placebo group. Sildenafil achieved maximum drug concentrations of 48 ng/ml, 88 ng/ml, and 271 ng/ml after 3 days of 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg tid, respectively., Conclusion: We have safely conducted a clinical trial of a drug not routinely used during pregnancy. Sildenafil in the escalating dose regimen 20-80 mg tid was well tolerated, with no increase in maternal or fetal morbidity or mortality but did not prolong pregnancy duration in women with preeclampsia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT 00141310).

ARD-07 (also known as EP01572) is a peptidomimetic growth hormone secretagogue that can be administered orally. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effects of a meal on the oral bioavailability of ARD-07 after a single oral dose (0.5 mg/kg). In addition, the pharmacodynamic effects (growth hormone release, insulin-like growth factor-1 concentrations) and the tolerability of ARD-07 are investigated in this open-label, randomized, crossover study. Sixteen healthy subjects (8 males, 8 females) receive ARD-07 on 2 different days; the treatment consists of a single oral dose of ARD-07 (0.5 mg/kg body weight), once with and the second day without a test meal. Plasma kinetics of ARD-07 and pharmacodynamic effects are quantified by specific assays. Results are given as mean +/- SEM: The area under the curve for 0 to 24 hours is approximately twice as high without food (27.8 +/- 4.1) than with food (13.7 +/- 1.2; P = .002). The maximum observed ARD-07 concentration relative to dose administration (C(max)) is more than twice as high without food (10.6 +/- 1.6 ng/mL) than with food (4.4 +/- 0.5 ng/mL; P = .001). C(max) of growth hormone occurs at a significantly (P = .001) later stage with food (C(max) = 13.0 +/- 3.5 ng/mL) than without food (37.1 +/- 5.3 ng/mL). Food has a marked effect on the absorption of ARD-07: there is a significant difference in bioavailability between administration of oral ARD-07 with and without food.

Objectives: In pre-eclampsia (PE), endothelium-dependent function of myometrial small arteries is markedly attenuated. The residual PE response is wholly NO mediated. We have previously demonstrated that PDE5 inhibition can improve endothelial function in myometrial small arteries from women with PE. We aimed to assess whether the effect of PDE5 inhibition in PE was myometrial artery specific., Study Design: Small arteries were dissected from omental biopsies obtained at Caesarean section from normal pregnant women (NP, N = 20) and women with PE (N = 11). Chorionic plate small arteries were dissected from NP (N = 13) and PE (N = 11) placentae. Vasoconstriction (arginine vasopressin or thromboxane-mimetic U46619) and endothelial-dependent relaxation were assessed by wire and pressure myography. Constriction/relaxation curves were repeated post 1h incubation with PDE5 inhibitors UK-343664 or sildenafil citrate (0, 10 or 100 nM)., Results: Omental artery constriction was increased in PE. Omental vessel constriction was unaffected by PDE5 inhibition. Sildenafil citrate improved bradykinin-induced but not acetylcholine-induced relaxation of omental small arteries from NP women. PDE5 inhibition did not alter relaxation of omental arteries from women with PE. Placental small arteries were unaffected by PDE5 inhibition., Conclusion: Use of PDE5 inhibitors does not significantly alter endothelial-dependent relaxation in omental or placental small arteries from PE women.

Background: A model to study the effect of vasopressin V1a antagonist in dysmenorrhea., Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial was performed. Eight patients with primary dysmenorrhea and eight tuballigated, healthy subjects participated on days 1-2 of two consecutive menstruations. At each menstruation a bolus injection of 10 pmol/kg of vasopressin was administered before and during infusion of either 300 microg/min of atosiban or placebo. Intrauterine pressure was measured as area under the curve throughout the experiments. Ischemia markers in plasma and pain recorded by a visual analog scale were measured before and after each vasopressin injection as well as before and after the start of either atosiban or placebo infusion., Results: Vasopressin injections elevated area under the curve in both healthy volunteers and dysmenorrhea subjects. The vasopressin-induced rise in area under the curve was lower during atosiban administration than during infusion of placebo in both groups. None of the ischemia markers differed between or within groups at vasopressin injections or atosiban/placebo infusions. In subjects with dysmenorrhea the increase in pain following the administration of vasopressin was significantly lower during atosiban than during placebo infusion. Healthy volunteers experienced only slight discomfort after the vasopressin injections., Conclusions: Atosiban reduces vasopressin-induced intrauterine pressure in both healthy volunteers and dysmenorrheics, and reported pain in subjects with dysmenorrhea. The ischemia markers are not a useful biomarker index in women with dysmenorrhea. The dysmenorrhea pain evoked by vasopressin correlated poorly with area under the curve, which may suggest that the effect is mediated by more than one V1a-like receptor. We conclude that this model with recordings in healthy women is useful in the evaluation of drug candidates for primary dysmenorrhea.

Background: The myometrial hyperactivity and reduced uterine blood flow of primary dysmenorrhea is to a large extent caused by increased vasopressin secretion. A new therapeutic approach for this condition is to develop antagonists of uterine vasopressin V1a receptors. We studied a test model of vasopressin-induced dysmenorrhea in healthy, sterilized women and compared responses against those in dysmenorrheic subjects., Methods: Eight women with primary dysmenorrhea and eight sterilized, healthy women participated in recordings of intrauterine pressure and experienced pain on days 1-2 of two menstruations. We tried to identify biochemical markers in plasma of uterine ischemia. Furthermore, the effects of repeated bolus injections of 10 pmol/kg b w of vasopressin or placebo on these parameters were assessed., Results: The vasopressin injections caused statistically significant increases in the area under the intrauterine pressure curve (AUC) in both healthy volunteers and patients with dysmenorrhea, the overall responses being greater in healthy volunteers. The experienced pain measured by visual analog scale in individual dysmenorrheic subjects tended to show higher maximal post-dose scores for the vasopressin injections than for placebo. Maximum visual analog scale scores and maximum AUCs in individual subjects tended to be related. Mean creatine kinase MB levels were higher in women with dysmenorrhea than in healthy subjects both before and after vasopressin administration, the converse being observed for C-reactive protein levels., Conclusions: The present model appears to be useful for evaluating new drugs for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.

Objective: In preeclampsia, endothelium-dependent function is markedly aberrant. Myometrial resistance arteries from women with preeclampsia show a minimal, wholly nitric oxide-mediated, bradykinin-induced relaxation. Our aim was to test that phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibition could improve endothelium-dependent function in preeclampsia. Study design Small arteries dissected from myometrial biopsies obtained at cesarean section from normal pregnant women (N=22) or women with preeclampsia (N=24) were mounted on wire or pressure myographs. Vessels were constricted (arginine vasopressin or U46619) and relaxed (bradykinin) before and after incubation with a PDE5 inhibitor, UK-343664., Results: Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation was decreased in vessels from women with preeclampsia. 100 nmol/L UK-343664 did not affect normal pregnant but significantly improved relaxation of the vessels from women with preeclampsia., Conclusion: A PDE5 inhibitor enhances endothelial function of myometrial vessels from women with preeclampsia, such that the behavior of these arteries approximates to those from normal women. These agents offer a potential therapeutic strategy for the management of preeclampsia.

Objective: To compare the T:QRS ratio recorded by the STAN and Nottingham fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) monitors., Design: Prospective observational study., Setting: London teaching hospital delivery suite and research unit., Methods and Subjects: The T:QRS ratios generated by the STAN and Nottingham FECG monitors were simultaneously recorded and compared using signals generated from a computer-produced ECG signal and signals from 11 term fetuses recorded during labour., Results: There was an acceptable level of agreement between the two systems with the computer-generated signals, but it was not clinically acceptable with the signals from the fetuses recorded during labour. Disagreements in the T:QRS values were probably due to differences in the reference points for the measurement of the S-T segment and T-wave height., Conclusion: The different points of reference for measurement of S-T segment and T-wave height can explain poor agreement between the two methods of FECG waveform analysis. The suggested adopted points of reference are those corresponding to adult electrocardiographic methodology.

Objectives: 1. To assess the information supplied by general practitioners on the gynaecological ultrasound request form and to determine how this information influences the interpretation of scans; and 2. To examine the influence of scans on the subsequent management of patients both by general practitioners and, where relevant, by hospital gynaecologists., Design: Retrospective analysis of gynaecological ultrasound requests made by general practitioners. Postal questionnaire and assessment of outcome according to general practitioners' records and, where appropriate, the hospital notes., Setting: A London teaching hospital gynaecological ultrasound department and associated general practices., Subjects: Four hundred ninety-eight women referred by general practitioners for a gynaecological ultrasound scan over a one year period (1990)., Results: The 498 requests for gynaecological ultrasound scans included 472 primary diagnostic referrals. Seventy-one percent of general practitioners replied to the questionnaires. Overall, 46% of the scans were normal, but the proportion of normal scans fell to 21% if the date of the last menstrual period and a pregnancy test result were included on the form. Forty per cent of women scanned subsequently were referred for hospital care., Conclusions: General practitioners would appear to use the ultrasound service in a rational way and therefore there can be no justification for not allowing them open access. The positive diagnostic yield can be further improved if time is taken to supply simple relevant information which may be facilitated by a specific request form.