Search

Background: It is unclear how pediatric orthopedic surgeons are geographically distributed relative to their patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the geographic distribution of pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the United States. Materials and Methods: County-level data of actively practicing pediatric orthopedic surgeons were identified by matching several registries and membership logs. Data were used to calculate the distance between counties and nearest surgeon. Counties were categorized as "surgeon clusters" or "surgeon deserts" if the distance to the nearest surgeon was less than or greater than the national average and the average of all neighboring counties, respectively. Cohorts were then compared for differences in population characteristics using data obtained from the 2020 American Community Survey. Results: A total of 1197 unique pediatric orthopedic surgeons were identified. The mean distance to the nearest pediatric orthopedic surgeon for a patient residing in a surgeon desert or a surgeon cluster was 141.9±53.8 miles and 30.9±16.0 miles, respectively. Surgeon deserts were found to have lower median household incomes (P<.001) and greater rates of children without health insurance (P<.001). Multivariate analyses showed that higher Rural-Urban Continuum codes (P<.001), Area Deprivation Index scores (P<.001), and percentage of patients without health insurance (P<.001) all independently required significantly greater travel distances to see a pediatric orthopedic surgeon. Conclusion: Pediatric orthopedic surgeons are not equally distributed in the United States, and many counties are not optimally served. Additional studies are needed to identify the relationship between travel distances and patient outcomes and how geographic inequalities can be minimized. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):e204–e210.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Substantial variation exists in surgeon decision making. In response, multiple specialty societies have established criteria for the appropriate use of spine surgery. Yet few strategies exist to facilitate routine use of appropriateness criteria by surgeons. Behavioral science nudges are increasingly used to enhance decision making by clinicians. We sought to design "surgical appropriateness nudges" to support routine use of appropriateness criteria for degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. Methods: The work reflected Stage I of the NIH Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development and involved an iterative, multi-method approach, emphasizing qualitative methods. Study sites included two large referral centers for spine surgery. We recruited spine surgeons from both sites for two rounds of focus groups. To produce preliminary nudge prototypes, we examined sources of variation in surgeon decision making (Focus Group 1) and synthesized existing knowledge of appropriateness criteria, behavioral science nudge frameworks, electronic tools, and the surgical workflow. We refined nudge prototypes via feedback from content experts, site leaders, and spine surgeons (Focus Group 2). Concurrently, we collected data on surgical practices and outcomes at study sites. We pilot tested the refined nudge prototypes among spine surgeons, and surveyed them about nudge applicability, acceptability, and feasibility (scale 1–5, 5 = strongly agree). Results: Fifteen surgeons participated in focus groups, giving substantive input and feedback on nudge design. Refined nudge prototypes included: individualized surgeon score cards (frameworks: descriptive social norms/peer comparison/feedback), online calculators embedded in the EHR (decision aid/mapping), a multispecialty case conference (injunctive norms/social influence), and a preoperative check (reminders/ salience of information/ accountable justification). Two nudges (score cards, preop checks) incorporated data on surgeon practices and outcomes. Six surgeons pilot tested the refined nudges, and five completed the survey (83%). The overall mean score was 4.0 (standard deviation [SD] 0.5), with scores of 3.9 (SD 0.5) for applicability, 4.1 (SD 0.5) for acceptability, and 4.0 (SD 0.5), for feasibility. Conferences had the highest scores 4.3 (SD 0.6) and calculators the lowest 3.9 (SD 0.4). Conclusions: Behavioral science nudges might be a promising strategy for facilitating incorporation of appropriateness criteria into the surgical workflow of spine surgeons. Future stages in intervention development will test whether these surgical appropriateness nudges can be implemented in practice and influence surgical decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design.: Retrospective review. Objective.: Our goal was to investigate the incidence of cervical degenerative disk disease (DDD) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), before surgical intervention. Summary of Background Data.: AIS is often associated with thoracic hypokyphosis and compensatory cervical kyphosis. In adults, cervical kyphosis is associated with DDD. Although cervical kyphosis has been reported in up to 60% AIS patients, the association with cervical DDD has not been reported. Materials and Methods.: A retrospective review was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019 of all consecutive AIS patients. Inclusion criteria were AIS patients over 10 years of age with cervical magnetic resonance imaging and anterior-posterior and lateral spine radiographs within 1 year of each other. Magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed for evidence of cervical DDD. Severity of cervical changes were graded using the Pfirrmann classification and by a quantitative measure of disk degeneration, the magnetic resonance signal intensity ratio. Results.: Eighty consecutive patients were included (mean age: 14.1 years, SD=2.5 years). Increasing cervical kyphosis was significantly correlated to decreasing thoracic kyphosis (r =0.49, P <0.01) and increasing major curve magnitude (r =0.22, P =0.04). Forty-five patients (56%) had the presence of DDD (grades 2–4) with a mean cervical kyphosis of 11.1° (SD=9.5°, P <0.01). More cervical kyphosis was associated with more severe cervical DDD as graded by Pfirrmann classification level (P <0.01). Increasing cervical kyphosis was also positively associated with increasing magnetic resonance signal intensity ratio (P <0.01). Nine patients had ventral cord effacement secondary to DDD with a mean cervical kyphosis of 22.8° (SD=8.6°) compared with 2.6° (SD=11.2°) in those who did not (P <0.01). Conclusions.: Cervical kyphosis was significantly associated with increasing severity of cervical DDD in patients with AIS. Patients with evidence of ventral cord effacement had the largest degree of cervical kyphosis with a mean of 22.8±8.6°. This is the first study to evaluate the association between cervical kyphosis in AIS with cervical DDD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]