Search

Acute retinal necrosis is a progressive intraocular inflammatory syndrome characterized by diffuse necrotizing retinitis that can lead to a poor visual outcome, mainly from retinal detachment. The antiviral treatment approach for acute retinal necrosis varies as there are no established guidelines. We summarize the outcomes of acute retinal necrosis with available antiviral treatments. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for interventional and observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled proportion of the predefined selected outcomes. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022320987). Thirty-four studies with a total of 963 participants and 1,090 eyes were included in the final analysis. The estimated varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex virus polymerase chain reaction-positive cases were 63% (95% CI: 55–71%) and 35% (95% CI: 28–42%), respectively. The 3 main antiviral treatment approaches identified were oral antivirals alone, intravenous antivirals alone, and a combination of systemic (oral or intravenous) and intravitreal antivirals. The overall pooled estimated proportions of visual acuity improvement, recurrence, and retinal detachment were 37% (95% CI: 27–47%), 14% (95% CI: 8–21%), and 43% (95% CI: 38–50%), respectively. Patients treated with systemic and intravitreal antivirals showed a trend towards better visual outcomes than those treated with systemic antivirals (oral or intravenous) alone, even though this analysis was not statistically significant (test for subgroup differences P = 0.83).

Ikhwanuliman Putera,1,2 Mei Riasanti,1 Lukman Edwar,1 Made Susiyanti,1 Ratna Sitompul,1 Yulia Aziza,1 Priscilla Jessica,1 Andriansjah Rukmana,3 Andi Yasmon,3 Rina La Distia Nora1,2,4 1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of MedicineUniversitas Indonesia – Cipto Mangunkusumo Kirana Eye Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; 2Department of Immunology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; 3Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; 4University of Indonesia Hospital (RSUI), Depok, West Java, IndonesiaCorrespondence: Rina La Distia Nora, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia – Cipto Mangunkusumo Kirana Eye Hospital, Jl. Kimia No. 8, Menteng, Central Jakarta, Jakarta, 10320, Indonesia, Tel +62811198910, Email rina.ladistia@ui.ac.idPurpose: To investigate the utility of nonroutine polymerase chain reaction analysis of intraocular fluid to guide the diagnosis of infectious uveitis.Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by reviewing medical record data from intraocular fluid samples of uveitis patients who underwent single-plex real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia – Cipto Mangunkusumo Kirana Eye Hospital between January 2014 and December 2018.Results: The positivity rate of nonroutine polymerase chain reaction analysis was 17.2%. The vitreous sample tended to show a higher positive outcome (28.6%) than the aqueous sample (16.2%), even though the outcome was not statistically significant. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Toxoplasma gondii were the most frequently observed microorganisms in the polymerase chain reaction analysis among uveitis patients in our setting. The duration of symptoms, type of sample fluid (aqueous/vitreous), or presence of anterior chamber cells ≥ 2 were not significantly associated with polymerase chain reaction positivity (p > 0.05).Conclusion

Purpose: To investigate the utility of nonroutine polymerase chain reaction analysis of intraocular fluid to guide the diagnosis of infectious uveitis. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by reviewing medical record data from intraocular fluid samples of uveitis patients who underwent single-plex real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia – Cipto Mangunkusumo Kirana Eye Hospital between January 2014 and December 2018. Results: The positivity rate of nonroutine polymerase chain reaction analysis was 17.2%. The vitreous sample tended to show a higher positive outcome (28.6%) than the aqueous sample (16.2%), even though the outcome was not statistically significant. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Toxoplasma gondii were the most frequently observed microorganisms in the polymerase chain reaction analysis among uveitis patients in our setting. The duration of symptoms, type of sample fluid (aqueous/vitreous), or presence of anterior chamber cells ≥2 were not significantly associated with polymerase chain reaction positivity (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Nonroutine polymerase chain reaction analysis of intraocular fluid among a cohort of Indonesian patients demonstrated low positivity. The sensitivity and specificity of nonroutine single-plex polymerase chain reaction could not be estimated due to limitations such as lost to follow-up patients and incomplete monitoring data. The use of multiplex polymerase chain reaction in the future may be beneficial in our setting.

Objective: To assess the clinical value of aqueous humor real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and serological antibody tests among uveitis patients in Indonesian cohort. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, single-plex RT-PCR analysis of aqueous samples from 86 new uveitis patients was performed to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Toxoplasmosis gondii, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, and rubella virus. Specific serological antibodies for suspected pathogens were also obtained. Comparison of PCR and serological antibodies with the initial and final diagnosis were presented. Results: The diagnostic positivity of aqueous RT-PCR in our cohort was 20% (17/86). The rate of infection as final etiological classification was higher after RT-PCR was performed (45 patients, 52%) compared to initial diagnosis based on clinical presentation alone (38 patients, 44%). In particular, the RT-PCR positivity among patients with infection as the final etiological classification was 33.33% (15/45). A significant difference in the IgG but not IgM toxoplasma value among those with ocular toxoplasmosis as the final diagnosis compared to the other etiologies were observed (3953 (IQR 2707–19562) IU/mL vs 428 (IQR 82–1807) IU/mL; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: RT-PCR analysis of aqueous fluid from uveitis patients helped confirm a third of infectious uveitis cases in Indonesia. In ocular toxoplasmosis, high IgG but not IgM antibody value might help differentiate those with other etiology.

Background: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is currently considered the method of choice for diagnosing ocular tuberculosis. However, the sensitivity and specificity of PCR using ocular samples remain uncertain. Our meta-analysis aimed to review the diagnostic accuracy of PCR testing in confirming ocular tuberculosis, with responses to antitubercular therapy (ATT) as reference indices. Methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EBSCOHost, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was performed using the standardized PRISMA guideline. Observational studies reporting both PCR MTb positivity and ATT response were included. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled positivity rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and summary receiver operating curves (SROC). Results: The pooled positivity rate for PCR MTb was 0.55 (95% CI 0.44–0.67). The overall sensitivity and specificity were 88% (95% CI 83–92) and 71% (95% CI 60–80), respectively. The pooled DOR was 12.15 (95% CI 5.55–26.62). The area under the SROC was 0.83. Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of PCR Mtb is not sufficient for use as a benchmark for ocular TB diagnosis routinely based on ATT response. A negative result may help avoid prescribing unnecessary ATT in dilemmatic cases.