1. Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities
- Author
-
Ari Haukkala, Satu Männistö, Hanna Konttinen, Sirpa Sarlio-Lähteenkorva, Karri Silventoinen, Department of Social Research (2010-2017), Social Psychology, Hjelt Institute (-2014), Department of Public Health, Sociology, Center for Population, Health and Society, Research group of Ari Haukkala, and Population Research Unit (PRU)
- Subjects
Male ,Epidemiology ,030309 nutrition & dietetics ,Cross-sectional study ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Socio-economic ,FFQ ,Choice Behavior ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,DIETARY-INTAKE ,Vegetables ,Food choice ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Finland ,media_common ,2. Zero hunger ,0303 health sciences ,education.field_of_study ,FIT INDEXES ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,WOMEN ,Middle Aged ,Nutrition Surveys ,3142 Public health care science, environmental and occupational health ,WEIGHT-GAIN ,5144 Social psychology ,5141 Sociology ,INEQUALITIES ,Female ,NUTRITION ,HEALTH ,Psychology ,Adult ,Inequality ,media_common.quotation_subject ,education ,Population ,Food choice motives ,CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRE ,Structural equation modeling ,Pleasure ,Food Preferences ,03 medical and health sciences ,Environmental health ,Humans ,Consumption (economics) ,Motivation ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Feeding Behavior ,ADULTS ,Diet ,Disadvantaged ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY ,Socioeconomic Factors ,Fruit - Abstract
ObjectiveA low socio-economic status (SES) is related to less healthy dietary habits, but the reasons for this remain unclear. We examined whether the absolute or relative importance of various food choice motives contributed to SES disparities in vegetable/fruit and energy-dense food intake.DesignWe analysed cross-sectional data from the FINRISK Study 2007 by means of structural equation modelling and used a shortened version of the Food Choice Questionnaire to assess the absolute importance of health, pleasure, convenience, price, familiarity and ethicality motives. We calculated the relative importance of each motive by dividing the participant's rating of it by his/her mean score on all motives. Dietary intake was measured with an FFQ.SettingA population-based survey in Finland.SubjectsMen (n 1691) and women (n 2059) aged 25–64 years.ResultsHigher education and income were related to a greater vegetable/fruit intake (β = 0·12, P < 0·001), while education was associated negatively with the consumption of energy-dense foods (β = −0·09, P < 0·001). Socio-economically disadvantaged individuals considered price and/or familiarity more important in their food choices in both absolute and relative terms. A higher income was related to a greater relative importance of health considerations. Relative motives were more strongly associated with vegetable/fruit and energy-dense food consumption than absolute motives and the relative importance of price, familiarity and health partly mediated the effects of the SES indicators on the consumption of these food items.ConclusionsIndividual priorities in food choice motives, rather than the absolute importance of single motives, play a role in producing SES disparities in diet.
- Published
- 2012