Search

Histamine has been widely used experimentally to induce headache in healthy subjects and migraine in migraineurs. There is evidence that the vascular effects of histamine are at least partially mediated by nitric oxide (NO). Hence we hypothesized that subjective symptoms and hemodynamic effects of histamine could be reduced by systemic NO-synthase inhibition. We therefore studied the effect of pretreatment with N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), a competitive inhibitor of NO-synthase, or placebo on headache, flush and discomfort scores during histamine infusion. Additionally, blood flow velocities in the middle cerebral and the ophthalmic artery and ocular fundus pulsations were measured. Whereas L-NMMA blunted the effect of histamine in the ophthalmic artery and the ocular circulation, NO-synthase inhibition did not mitigate subjective symptoms. Histamine did not affect mean blood flow velocities in the middle cerebral artery. Hence, we conclude that NO-synthase inhibition reduces the histamine-induced vascular effects in the ocular circulation, but is not sufficient to attenuate or abort the subjective symptoms provoked by histamine infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modern advances in systemic and localized therapies for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have significantly improved patients' outcomes. If disease progression occurs after initial treatment, clinicians often have multiple options for a first salvage therapy. Because salvage and initial treatments both may affect overall survival time, and they may interact in unanticipated ways, there is a growing need to determine sequences of initial therapy and first salvage therapy that maximize overall survival while maintaining quality of life. The complexity of this problem grows if a second salvage therapy must be chosen for patients with treatment-resistant disease or a second progression occurs following first salvage. On November 9, 2023, a think tank was convened during the International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS) North America to discuss challenges in accounting for postprogression therapies when estimating overall survival (OS) time based on randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. The present manuscript summarizes the topics discussed, with the aim to encourage adoption of statistical methods that account for salvage therapy effects to obtain scientifically valid OS estimation. We highlight limitations of traditional methods for estimating OS that account for initial treatments while ignoring salvage therapy effects and discuss advantages of applying more sophisticated statistical methods for estimation and trial design. These include identifying multistage treatment strategies, correcting for confounding due to salvage therapy effects, and conducting Sequentially Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) to obtain unbiased comparisons between multistage strategies. We emphasize the critical role of patient input in trial design, and the potential for information technology (IT) advances to support complex trial designs and real-time data analyses. By addressing these challenges, future RCTs can better inform clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in RCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Pavlos Msaouel reports honoraria for scientific advisory board membership for Mirati Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Exelixis; consulting fees from Axiom Healthcare; nonbranded educational programs supported by Exelixis, Pfizer, and DAVA Oncology; leadership or fiduciary roles as a Medical Steering Committee member for the Kidney Cancer Association and a Kidney Cancer Scientific Advisory Board member for KCCure; and research funding from Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Mirati Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Gateway for Cancer Research. Eric A. Singer reports honoraria for data safety monitoring board membership for Aura Biosciences and leadership or fiduciary roles as a Medical Steering Committee member for the Kidney Cancer Association. Kathryn E Beckermann received funding to the institution for preclinical awards including BMS-IASLC-LCFA, Pionyr, Arsenal Bio, and Aravive, as well as funds as a consultant to Aravive, Aveo, Arcus, Alpine Bioscience, BMS, Exelixis, Merck, Eisai, Nimbus, and Adicet. Bradley A. McGregor reports consulting fees from Arcus, BMS, Daiichi, Eisai, Exelixis, Gilead, Lily, Pfizer as well as research funding to institution from BMS, Exelixis, Gilead, and Pfizer. Ulka N. Vaishampayan reports consulting fees from BMS. Novartis, Merck, Exelixis, Pfizer, Glilead and Alkermes, as well as speaker fees from Bayes and Exelixis. Eric Jonasch reports research support from Abbvie, Arrowhead, Aveo, BMS, Corvus, Merck, NiKang, ProFoundBio, Telix, honoraria from Aveo, Clinical Care Options, DAVA, EBSCO, Eisai, Exelixis, GSK, IDEO Oncology, i3 Health, Ipsen, Kaplan, Merck, Novartis, NiKang, Petra Drugstore, Plexus, leadership position in NCCN Guidelines (Vice-Chair Kidney Cancer Panel), member of the NCI RCC Steering Committee, and board Member of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Katie Coleman is employed by the Rare Cancer Research Foundation and has received honoraria from Exelixis for a speaking engagement related to patient advocacy. Nizar M. Tannir reported receiving and personal fees (honoraria) from Calithera Biosciences during the conduct of the study; and grants (sponsored trial) from Calithera Biosciences, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Nektar Therapeutics, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis, as well as personal fees (honoraria) from Calithera Biosciences, BMS, Eisai Medical Research, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Deka Biosciences, Neoleukin Therapeutics, Exelixis, and Ono Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Daniel M Geynisman reports honoraria from Targeted Oncology, consulting fees from Pfizer, Exelixis, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, as well as research funding to institution from Merck, Astellas Pharma, Harpoon Therapeutics, Arvinas, and CG Oncology. Walter M. Stadler reports consulting fees for participation in Data and Safety Monitoring Board from Astra-Zeneca, Merck, Pfizer, and Treadwell Therapeutics, other consulting fees from Astra-Zeneca, Aveo, Caremark/CVS, EMA Wellness, Fortress Biotech, and Xencor, speakers bureau for CME programs from Dava Oncology, Global Academyc for Medical Education, OncLive, PeerView, Research to Practice, and Vindico, research funding to institution from Abbvie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Astellas (Medivation), Bayer, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Calithera, Corvus, Eisai, Exilixis, Genentech (Roche), Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, X4Pharmaceuticals, Xencor, stock holdings from Fortress Biotech, Expert Witness for Sandoz, as well as miscellaneous fees from Cancer (ACS), Up-To-Date, and the Kidney Cancer Journal. Yousef Zakharia reports advisory board / consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Janssen, Eisai, Exelixis, Genzyme Corporation, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Astellas, and Seagen, Grant/research institutional support from Pfizer, Exelixis, and Eisai, as well as honoraria for data safety monitoring board membership from Janssen Research and Development. Daniel D. Shapiro has no disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor, accounting for 1% of all head and neck cancers, with an aggressive nature characterized by local recurrence, delayed metastasis, and survival of less than 50% at 10 years. This is a case of biopsy-proven ACC to the kidney, 1 of 29 known occurrences, managed by metastasectomy by robotic-assisted nephrectomy, with plans for resection of lung metastasis. Thirteen years after diagnosis of sinonasal ACC treated with resection, the patient presented with shortness of breath. This prompted a CT scan of the chest, which led to the incidental finding of left renal mass and pulmonary lesion. Literature suggests improved disease-specific survival in locoregional recurrence treated with surgery versus radiation; in patients with metastasis to the lung, metastasectomy offers greater survival benefit than supportive therapy. But, this is not significantly better than chemotherapy or radiation alone. While the optimal therapeutic approach remains to be identified in distant metastatic ACC, metastasectomy remains a viable option for patients who have potentially completely resectable metastatic tumors, appropriate performance status, and adequate affected-organ function. Preoperative counseling should include discussion on partial nephrectomy with prioritization of nephron-sparing but potential for increased perioperative risk versus radical nephrectomy to ensure negative margins and expedite timeline to systemic therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright: Singer E.A., et al.)

Background: The standard of care for patients with intermediate-to-high risk renal cell carcinoma is partial or radical nephrectomy followed by surveillance. We aimed to investigate use of nivolumab before nephrectomy followed by adjuvant nivolumab in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma to determine recurrence-free survival compared with surgery only., Methods: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial (PROSPER EA8143), patients were recruited from 183 community and academic sites across the USA and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, with previously untreated clinical stage T2 or greater or T any N+ renal cell carcinoma of clear cell or non-clear cell histology planned for partial or radical nephrectomy. Selected patients with oligometastatic disease, who were disease free at other disease sites within 12 weeks of surgery, were eligible for inclusion. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients using permuted blocks (block size of 4) within stratum (clinical TNM stage) to either nivolumab plus surgery, or surgery only followed by surveillance. In the nivolumab group, nivolumab 480 mg was administered before surgery, followed by nine adjuvant doses. The primary endpoint was investigator-reviewed recurrence-free survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma assessed in all randomly assigned patients regardless of histology. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who started the assigned protocol treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03055013, and is closed to accrual., Findings: Between Feb 2, 2017, and June 2, 2021, 819 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus surgery (404 [49%]) or surgery only (415 [51%]). 366 (91%) of 404 patients assigned to nivolumab plus surgery and 387 (93%) of 415 patients assigned to surgery only group started treatment. Median age was 61 years (IQR 53-69), 248 (30%) of 819 patients were female, 571 (70%) were male, 672 (88%) were White, and 77 (10%) were Hispanic or Latino. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee stopped the trial at a planned interim analysis (March 25, 2022) because of futility. Median follow-up was 30·4 months (IQR 21·5-42·4) in the nivolumab group and 30·1 months (21·9-41·8) in the surgery only group. 381 (94%) of 404 patients in the nivolumab plus surgery group and 399 (96%) of 415 in the surgery only group had renal cell carcinoma and were included in the recurrence-free survival analysis. As of data cutoff (May 24, 2023), recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between nivolumab (125 [33%] of 381 had recurrence-free survival events) versus surgery only (133 [33%] of 399; hazard ratio 0·94 [95% CI 0·74-1·21]; one-sided p=0·32). The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were elevated lipase (17 [5%] of 366 patients in the nivolumab plus surgery group vs none in the surgery only group), anaemia (seven [2%] vs nine [2%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (ten [3%] vs one [<1%]), abdominal pain (four [1%] vs six [2%]), and increased serum amylase (nine [2%] vs none). 177 (48%) patients in the nivolumab plus surgery group and 93 (24%) in the surgery only group had grade 3-5 adverse events due to any cause, the most common of which were anaemia (23 [6%] vs 19 [5%]), hypertension (27 [7%] vs nine [2%]), and elevated lipase (18 [5%] vs six [2%]). 48 (12%) of 404 patients in the nivolumab group and 40 (10%) of 415 in the surgery only group died, of which eight (2%) and three (1%), respectively, were determined to be treatment-related., Interpretation: Perioperative nivolumab before nephrectomy followed by adjuvant nivolumab did not improve recurrence-free survival versus surgery only followed by surveillance in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma., Funding: US National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute and Bristol Myers Squibb., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests VM reports support for attending meetings or travel from American College of Surgeons; and participation on the Advisory Board on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Exelixis. VM also reports a leadership role (unpaid) on Society of Urologic Oncology Clinical Trials Consortia. DFM received payment or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Merck, Eisai, Xilio, Aveo, Genentech, Cullinan, and Exelixis; and support for attending meetings or travel from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Genentech, Pfizer, Exelixis, X4 Pharma, and Alkermes. LCH reports ownership of stock in Coherus and previous employment at Surface Oncology. SS reports grants or contracts from Bristol Myers Squibb and Exelixis to their institution; and royalties or licenses from Biogenex. SS also reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, and CRISPR Therapeutics; and a leadership or fiduciary role at American Association for Cancer Research as Senior Editor at Clinical Cancer Research and at the NCI National Cancer Institute as Renal Task Force Co-Chair. HE reports consulting fees for Janssen and Aveo advisory boards. NA reports grants or contracts from Exelixis, Genentech, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and consulting fees from Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Aveo, Merck, EMD Serono, and Sanofi. MAB reports institutional grants from Merck, Xencor, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, SeaGen, Incyte, Nektar, AstraZeneca, Tricon Pharmaceuticals, Genome & Company, AAA, Peloton Therapeutics, and Pfizer; and payment or honoraria for Advisory Board participation from Exelixis, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Calithera Biosciences, Genomic Health, Nektar, EMD Serono, SeaGen, and Sanofi. TMM reports payment to their institution for clinical trials from Merck, Curium, and ECOG; consulting fees from Impact Network and Aptitude Health; and honoraria from Exelixis and Blue Earth Diagnostics. TC reports support from Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, HiberCell, IQVIA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Neomorph, Nuscan/PrecedeBio, Novartis, Oncohost, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, and CME events (Peerview, OncLive, MJH, CCO, and others), outside the submitted work. TC also reports institutional research funding related to clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Aveo, Arcus, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, and Takeda. TC also reports consulting fees from Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, HiberCell, IQVIA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Neomorph, Nuscan/PrecedeBio, Novartis, Oncohost, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, CME events (Peerview, OncLive, MJH, CCO, and others), outside the submitted work. TC also reports payment or honoraria from Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, HiberCell, IQVIA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Neomorph, Nuscan/PrecedeBio, Novartis, Oncohost, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, CME events (Peerview, OncLive, MJH, CCO, and others), outside the submitted work. TC also reports support for attending meetings or travel in relation to meetings, lectures, and advisory boards; and participates in the Aravive Data and Safety Monitoring Board or advisory board. TC also reports a patent related to ctDNA and biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (no royalties as of current date). TC also reports a leadership or fiduciary role in KidneyCan (unpaid) and committees for American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and Genitourinary Steering Committee of the NCI. TC also reports stock ownership (for being an advisor) of Pionyr, Tempest, Precede Bio, Osel, Curesponse, Immdura, and Primium. TC also reports no receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services, except for travel and accommodation (flights, hotel, and meals) related to advisory or consulting when travel needed. TC also reports to be supported in part by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney SPORE(2P50CA101942-16) and Program 5P30CA006516-56, the Kohlberg Chair at Harvard Medical School and the Trust Family, Michael Brigham, Pan-Mass Challenge, Hinda and Arthur Marcus Fund, and Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at Dana Farber Cancer Institute. MDD reports participation on the Scientific Advisory Boards (honoraria received) at Merck, Eisai, Exelixis, and Janssen. DYH reports compensation from consulting work from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Ipsen, Exelixis, Pfizer, and Eisai. BS reports consulting fees from Merck, Veracyte, Telix, and Johnson and Johnson; payment or honoraria from Merck; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Telix. BCL reports a leadership or fiduciary role at Kidney Cancer Association as Chair of Board of Directors. JM reports participation on the NCI Central Institutional Review Board and has been recused from all discussions of this study. RU reports participation and financial support on a Data Safety Monitoring Board at Pfizer and other financial support on a steering committee at Merck. RU also reports a leadership or fiduciary role (non-financial support) at Haymarket Media as a board member. GB reports a leadership role during the study as President of the Society of Urologic Oncology–Clinical Trial Consortium. NBH reports participation in the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee atezolizumab at Roche Genentech and advisory boards at Bristol Myers Squibb and Eisai. NBH also reports a non-financial leadership role as ECOG ACRIN Genitourinary Committee Co-Chair. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Emerging evidence supports the important role of the tumor microbiome in oncogenesis, cancer immune phenotype, cancer progression, and treatment outcomes in many malignancies. In this study, we investigated the metastatic melanoma tumor microbiome and its potential roles in association with clinical outcomes, such as survival, in patients with metastatic disease treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Baseline tumor samples were collected from 71 patients with metastatic melanoma before treatment with ICIs. Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was conducted on the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen tumor samples. Durable clinical benefit (primary clinical endpoint) following ICIs was defined as overall survival >24 months and no change to the primary drug regimen (responders). We processed RNA-seq reads to carefully identify exogenous sequences using the {exotic} tool. The age of the 71 patients with metastatic melanoma ranged from 24 to 83 years, 59% were male, and 55% survived >24 months following the initiation of ICI treatment. Exogenous taxa were identified in the tumor RNA-seq, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. We found differences in gene expression and microbe abundances in immunotherapy-responsive versus nonresponsive tumors. Responders showed significant enrichment of bacteriophages in the phylum Uroviricota, and nonresponders showed enrichment of several bacteria, including Campylobacter jejuni. These microbes correlated with immune-related gene expression signatures. Finally, we found that models for predicting prolonged survival with immunotherapy using both microbe abundances and gene expression outperformed models using either dataset alone. Our findings warrant further investigation and potentially support therapeutic strategies to modify the tumor microbiome in order to improve treatment outcomes with ICIs., Significance: We analyzed the tumor microbiome and interactions with genes and pathways in metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy and identified several microbes associated with immunotherapy response and immune-related gene expression signatures. Machine learning models that combined microbe abundances and gene expression outperformed models using either dataset alone in predicting immunotherapy responses., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Foam cells are dysfunctional, lipid-laden macrophages associated with chronic inflammation of diverse origin. The long-standing paradigm that foam cells are cholesterol-laden derives from atherosclerosis research. We previously showed that, in tuberculosis, foam cells surprisingly accumulate triglycerides. Here, we utilized bacterial ( Mycobacterium tuberculosis ), fungal ( Cryptococcus neoformans ), and human papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) models to address the need for a new explanation of foam cell biogenesis. We applied mass spectrometry-based imaging to assess the spatial distribution of storage lipids relative to foam-cell-rich areas in lesional tissues, and we characterized lipid-laden macrophages generated under corresponding in vitro conditions. The in vivo data and the in vitro findings showed that cryptococcus-infected macrophages accumulate triglycerides, while macrophages exposed to pRCC- conditioned-medium accumulated both triglycerides and cholesterol. Moreover, cryptococcus- and mycobacterium-infected macrophages accumulated triglycerides in different ways. Collectively, the data show that the molecular events underlying foam cell formation are specific to disease and microenvironment. Since foam cells are potential therapeutic targets, recognizing that their formation is disease-specific opens new biomedical research directions.

Tumor hypoxia has been shown to predict poor patient outcomes in several cancer types, partially because it reduces radiation's ability to kill cells. We hypothesized that some of the clinical effects of hypoxia could also be due to its impact on the tumor microbiome. Therefore, we examined the RNA sequencing data from the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network database of patients with colorectal cancer treated with radiotherapy. We identified microbial RNAs for each tumor and related them to the hypoxic gene expression scores calculated from host mRNA. Our analysis showed that the hypoxia expression score predicted poor patient outcomes and identified tumors enriched with certain microbes such as Fusobacterium nucleatum. The presence of other microbes, such as Fusobacterium canifelinum, predicted poor patient outcomes, suggesting a potential interaction between hypoxia, the microbiome, and radiation response. To experimentally investigate this concept, we implanted CT26 colorectal cancer cells into immune-competent BALB/c and immune-deficient athymic nude mice. After growth, in which tumors passively acquired microbes from the gastrointestinal tract, we harvested tumors, extracted nucleic acids, and sequenced host and microbial RNAs. We stratified tumors based on their hypoxia score and performed a metatranscriptomic analysis of microbial gene expression. In addition to hypoxia-tropic and -phobic microbial populations, analysis of microbial gene expression at the strain level showed expression differences based on the hypoxia score. Thus, hypoxia gene expression scores seem to associate with different microbial populations and elicit an adaptive transcriptional response in intratumoral microbes, potentially influencing clinical outcomes., Significance: Tumor hypoxia reduces radiotherapy efficacy. In this study, we explored whether some of the clinical effects of hypoxia could be due to interaction with the tumor microbiome. Hypoxic gene expression scores associated with certain microbes and elicited an adaptive transcriptional response in others that could contribute to poor clinical outcomes., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a heterogenous disease with a variable clinical course. While therapies for treatment of this condition have progressed, they are not without toxicity. In some patients, active surveillance (AS) of this disease is increasingly considered to delay its toxicity. This article seeks to review the literature and discuss management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, specifically regarding upfront AS, the role of radiation therapy in delaying systemic therapy, and surveillance after initial treatment with systemic therapy. Median time on AS prior to initiation of systemic therapy ranged from 14 to 60 months across studies. AS is appropriate to offer in favorable or intermediate risk, asymptomatic, and systemic treatment naïve patients with mRCC., (Copyright: Dason S., et al.)

Purpose: This study investigates a real-world multicenter cohort of patients with urinary tract cancer (UTC), with primary disease sites including the bladder, urethra, and upper tract, who enrolled for research molecular testing of their germline and tumor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that could affect the likelihood of identifying a clinically actionable germline pathogenic variant (PV)., Methods: Patients with UTC were identified from 10 cancer institutes of the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network consortium. The data set comprised abstracted clinical data with germline and tumor genomic data, and comparative analyses were conducted., Results: Clinically actionable germline PVs in cancer predisposition genes were identified in 16 (4.5%) of 354 patients. A higher proportion of patients with the urethra and the upper tract as the primary sites of disease had PVs with a prevalence of 11% (5/45), compared with only 3.6% (11/308) in those with the bladder as the primary site of disease ( P = .04). There were no significant differences in markers of genomic instability (such as tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability [MSI], and loss of heterozygosity, copy number, and chromosomal instability) between those with PVs and those without ( P > .05). Of the PVs identified, 10 (62%) were in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, three (19%) in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, and three (19%) in genes associated with other pathways., Conclusion: Tissue-based assessment of genomic instability, such as MSI, does not reliably indicate germline PV. A comprehensive clinical germline testing approach that includes HRR genes in addition to MMR genes is likely to yield PVs in approximately one of 10 patients with nonbladder primary disease sites such as the upper tract and the urethra.

Background: The KEYNOTE-057 trial evaluated activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who were ineligible for or declined radical cystectomy. In cohort A (patients with carcinoma in situ, with or without papillary tumours) of the KEYNOTE-057 study, pembrolizumab monotherapy led to a complete response rate of 41% at 3 months, and 46% of responders maintained a response lasting at least 12 months. Here, we evaluate pembrolizumab monotherapy in cohort B of patients with papillary tumours without carcinoma in situ., Methods: KEYNOTE-057 is a single-arm, phase 2 study in 54 sites (hospitals and cancer centres) in 14 countries. Cohort B eligible patients were aged 18 years and older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with papillary tumours (high-grade Ta or any-grade T1) without carcinoma in situ. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour within 12 weeks of first pembrolizumab dose was required. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of 35 cycles. Primary endpoint was 12-month disease-free survival of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer or progressive disease as assessed by cystoscopy, cytology, and central pathology and radiology review. Activity was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had a baseline evaluation. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02625961, and is ongoing., Findings: Between April 12, 2016, and June 17, 2021, 132 patients (104 [79%] men and 28 [21%] women) who had received a median of ten (IQR 9-15) previous BCG instillations were enrolled into cohort B of the study. Patients received a median of 10 cycles (IQR 6-27) of pembrolizumab. At data cutoff date, Oct 20, 2022, median follow-up was 45·4 months (IQR 36·4-59·3) and five (4%) of 132 patients remained on treatment. The 12-month disease-free survival was 43·5% (95% CI 34·9-51·9). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97 (73%) of 132 patients; 19 (14%) had a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event; the most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were colitis (in three [2%] patients) and diarrhoea (in two [2%]). 17 (13%) of 132 patients experienced serious treatment-related adverse events, of which colitis (three patients [2%]) was most common. No treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed antitumour activity and manageable toxicity in patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk Ta or T1 bladder cancer without carcinoma in situ and could potentially be a suitable treatment option for patients who decline or are ineligible for radical cystectomy. Findings will need to be confirmed in a randomised controlled trial., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AN reports grants to his institution from Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD); personal consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Catalym, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, and Roche; and support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Catalym, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, and Roche. MR served as a consultant for Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen Oncology, Bayer, Ferring, Pierre Fabre, Photocure, Oncodiag, and Bristol Myers Squibb. AMK reports grants from Arquer Diagnostics, EnGene, Ferring, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, PhotoCure, Seagen, and SWOG; consulting fees from Astellas Pharma, Biological Dynamics, Bristol Myers Squibb, CG Oncology, Cystotech, Eisai, EnGene, Ferring, Imagin Medical, Imvax, Incyte, Janssen, Medac, MSD, Nonagen Bioscience, Pfizer, PhotoCure, Protara Therapeutics, Roche, Seagen, Sessen Bio, Theralase, Urogen Pharma, US Biotest, and Vivet Therapeutics; has a joint patent with MD Anderson Cancer Center for CyPRIT (Cytokine Predictors of Response to Intravesical Therapy); and holds a leadership or fiduciary role for a board or committee for European Urology Oncology, International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG), International Bladder Cancer Network (IBCN), Journal of Urology, and UroToday. NDS reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Accord, Alessa Therapeutics, Amgen, Antev, Arquer, Asieris, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Aura Biosciences, Bayer, Bioprotect, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, CG Oncology, Clarity, Cold Genesys, Dendreon, Exact Imaging, Genetench/Roche, Ferring, Fize Medical, Foundation Medicine, Genesis Care, Immunity Bio, Incyte, Invitae, Janssen, Lantheus, Lilly, MDX Health, MSD, Minomic, Myovant, Myriad, Nonagen, Novartis Nymox, Palette Life, PlatformQ, Pacific Edge, Pfizer, Preview, Profound Medical, Promaxo, Protara, PhotoCure, Propella, Sanofi Genzyme, Speciality Networks, Telix, Tolmar, and Urogen; and holds a leadership or fiduciary role for a board or committee for Alessa and PhotoCure. JLB reports grants to his institution from Merck, MSD, and Vitroscan; consulting fees to his institution from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck/Pfizer, and MSD; and honoraria to his institution from Astellas. TL reports personal honoraria from Ipsen and Bristol Myers Squibb and support for attending meetings or travel from Pfizer. DFB reports support for this manuscript from MSD; grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and MSD; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and MSD; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb and MSD; and NCI grant P30 CA008748. LEMK served on a speaker's bureau for MSD and received honoraria for speaker's bureau and lectures from MSD. EMU reports grants from Merck, Seagen, CG Oncology, and Pfizer and honoraria from Merck and Pfizer. HKS reports research support for this manuscript from MSD; consulting fees from MSD; and honoraria for lectures from MSD. RdW reports support to his institution for this manuscript from MSD; personal consulting fees from Astellas and MSD; personal honoraria for lectures from Astellas and Bayer; and participation on an advisory board for Astellas and MSD. EAS reports research support to his institution from Astellas/Medivation and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Aura Biosciences, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, and Vyriad. PG reports support for this manuscript from MSD; consultancy role for 4D Pharma, Aadi Bioscience, AbbVie, Asieris Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BostonGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, CG Oncology, Dyania Health, Exelixis, Fresenius Kabi, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Guardant Health, ImmunityBio, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Lucence, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Pfizer, PureTech, QED Therapeutics, Regeneron, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Silverback Therapeutics, Strata Oncology, and UroGen Pharma; research support to his institution from ALX Oncology, Acrivon Therapeutics, Bavarian Nordic, Bristol Myers Squibb, Debiopharm Group, Genentech, G1 Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Pfizer, and QED Therapeutics; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Board for Bristol Myers Squibb and Strata Oncology. HN reports support for this manuscript from MSD; grants to his institution from Ono Pharmaceutical; contracts to his institution from Astellas and Chugai Pharma; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, and Ono Pharmaceutical; and personal honoraria for speaker's bureaus from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, and Ono Pharmaceutical. HL is an employee of MSD and holds stock in Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA. PB is a contractor for MSD, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA. MVdS-F is an employee of MSD Netherlands and holds stock in Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA. EK is an employee of MSD and holds stock in Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA. GSK reports nonfinancial support for this manuscript from MSD; consulting fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, PhotoCure, TerSera, Tolmar, and Verity; honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Janssen, Knight Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PhotoCure, Theralase, Verity; and a leadership role (vice chair research) for Bladder Cancer Canada. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction: This study aims to determine if there is a difference in prostate cancer nomogram-adjusted risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and/or adverse pathology (AP) between African American (AAM) and Caucasian men (CM) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP)., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of men undergoing RP in the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative between 2015 and 2021. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare the rate of BCR after RP, and logistic regression models were used to compare rates of AP after RP between CM and AAM, adjusting for the CAPRA, CAPRA-S, and MSKCC pre- and post-operative nomogram scores., Results: Rates of BCR and AP after RP were analyzed from 3190 and 5029 men meeting inclusion criteria, respectively. The 2-year BCR-free survival was lower in AAM (72.5%) compared to CM (79.0%), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.38 (95% CI 1.16-1.63, p < 0.001). The rate of BCR was significantly greater in AAM compared to CM after adjustment for MSKCC pre-op (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.08-1.53; p = 0.004), and post-op nomograms (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.05-1.49; p < 0.001). There was a trend toward higher BCR rates among AAM after adjustment for CAPRA (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.95-1.35; p = 0.17) and CAPRA-S nomograms (HR 1.11; 95% 0.93-1.32; p = 0.25), which did not reach statistical significance. The rate of AP was significantly greater in AAM compared to CM after adjusting for CAPRA (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.10-1.50; p = 0.001) and MSKCC nomograms (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.06-1.43; p = 0.007)., Conclusion: This analysis of a large multicenter cohort provides further evidence that AAM may have higher rates of BCR and AP after RP than is predicted by CAPRA and MSKCC nomograms. Accordingly, AAM may benefit with closer post-operative surveillance and may be more likely to require salvage therapies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Purpose of Review: This review focuses on special populations poorly represented in current evidence-based practice for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This includes the elderly and frail, patients on immunosuppression or with autoimmune diseases, patients with brain, liver, and/or bone metastases, and RCC with sarcomatoid features., Recent Findings: Certain populations are poorly represented in current trials for mRCC. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases are often excluded from first-line therapy trials. Modern doublet systemic therapy appears to benefit patients with bone or liver metastases, but data supporting this conclusion is not robust. Post-hoc analyses on patients with sarcomatoid differentiation have shown improved response to modern doublet therapy over historical treatments. The elderly are underrepresented in current clinical trials, and most trials exclude all but high-performing (nonfrail) patients, though true frailty is likely poorly captured using the current widely adopted indices. It is difficult to make conclusions about the efficacy of modern therapy in these populations from subgroup analyses. Data from trials on other malignancies in patients with autoimmune diseases or solid organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may still have benefit, though at the risk of disease flare or organ rejection. The efficacy of ICIs has not been demonstrated specifically for RCC in this group of patients., Summary: The elderly, frail, and immunosuppressed, those with tumors having aggressive histologic features, and patients with brain, bone, and/or liver metastases represent the populations least understood in the modern era of RCC treatment., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Materials and Methods: An Institutional Review Board-exempt REDCap survey was distributed through the Society of Academic Urologists to all 508 applicants registered for the 2023 Urology Match following the rank list submission deadline on January 10, 2023. The survey closed on February 1, 2023. Responses were anonymized, aggregated, and characterized using descriptive statistics. Thematic mapping of open text comments was performed by 2 reviewers., Results: The response rate was 42% (215/508). Eighty-eight percent of respondents disapproved of the Dobbs ruling. Twenty percent of respondents (15% male/24% female) eliminated programs in states where abortion is illegal. Fifty-nine percent (51% male/70% female) would be concerned for their or their partner's health if they matched in a state where abortion was illegal, and 66% (55% male/82% female) would want their program to assist them or their partner if they required abortion care during residency. Due to the competitive nature of Urology, 68% of applicants reported feeling at least somewhat obligated to apply in states where abortion legislation conflicts with their beliefs. Of the 65 comments provided by respondents, 4 common themes emerged: (1) avoidance of states with restrictive abortion laws; (2) inability to limit applications because of the competitiveness of urology; (3) impacts on personal health care; and (4) desire for advocacy from professional urology organizations., Conclusion: The Dobbs ruling will impact the urology workforce by affecting urology applicants' decision-making regarding residency selection and ranking. Although the competitiveness of the Urology Match pressures applicants to apply broadly, many are taking reproductive health care access into consideration., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that androgen receptor signaling strongly contributes to bladder cancer development. The roles of the androgen receptor in bladder carcinogenesis have obvious implications for understanding the strong male sex bias in this disease and for potential therapeutic strategies as well. In this review, we summarize what is known about androgen receptor signaling in urothelial carcinoma as well as in tumor-infiltrating immune cells, reviewing preclinical and clinical data. We also highlight clinical trial efforts in this area.

Evidence supports significant interactions among microbes, immune cells, and tumor cells in at least 10%-20% of human cancers, emphasizing the importance of further investigating these complex relationships. However, the implications and significance of tumor-related microbes remain largely unknown. Studies have demonstrated the critical roles of host microbes in cancer prevention and treatment responses. Understanding interactions between host microbes and cancer can drive cancer diagnosis and microbial therapeutics (bugs as drugs). Computational identification of cancer-specific microbes and their associations is still challenging due to the high dimensionality and high sparsity of intratumoral microbiome data, which requires large datasets containing sufficient event observations to identify relationships, and the interactions within microbial communities, the heterogeneity in microbial composition, and other confounding effects that can lead to spurious associations. To solve these issues, we present a bioinformatics tool, microbial graph attention (MEGA), to identify the microbes most strongly associated with 12 cancer types. We demonstrate its utility on a dataset from a consortium of nine cancer centers in the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network. This package has three unique features: species-sample relations are represented in a heterogeneous graph and learned by a graph attention network; it incorporates metabolic and phylogenetic information to reflect intricate relationships within microbial communities; and it provides multiple functionalities for association interpretations and visualizations. We analyzed 2,704 tumor RNA sequencing samples and MEGA interpreted the tissue-resident microbial signatures of each of 12 cancer types. MEGA can effectively identify cancer-associated microbial signatures and refine their interactions with tumors., Significance: Studying the tumor microbiome in high-throughput sequencing data is challenging because of the extremely sparse data matrices, heterogeneity, and high likelihood of contamination. We present a new deep learning tool, MEGA, to refine the organisms that interact with tumors., (© 2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Immuno-oncology therapy (IO) is associated with a variety of treatment-related toxicities. However, the impact of toxicity on the treatment discontinuation rate between males and females is unknown. We hypothesized that immune-related adverse events would lead to more frequent treatment changes in females since autoimmune diseases occur more frequently in females., Aims: Our aim was to determine if there was a difference in the rate of immunotherapy treatment change due to toxicity between males and females., Methods and Results: The Oncology Research Information Exchange Network Avatar Database collected clinical data from 10 United States cancer centers. Of 1035 patients receiving IO, 447 were analyzed, excluding those who did not have documentation noting if a patient changed treatment (n = 573). Fifteen patients with unknown or gender-specific cancer were excluded. All cancer types and stages were included. The primary endpoint was documented treatment change due to toxicity. Four hundred and forty-seven patients (281 males and 166 females) received IO treatment. The most common cancers treated were kidney, skin, and lung for 99, 84, and 54 patients, respectively. Females had a shorter IO course than males (median 3.7 vs. 5.1 months, respectively, p = .02). Fifty-four patients changed treatment due to toxicity. There was no significant difference between females and males on chi-square test (11.4% vs. 12.5%, respectively, p = 0.75) and multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.924, 95% CI 0.453-1.885, p = .827). Significantly more patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) changed therapy due to toxicity (OR 2.491, 95% CI 1.025-6.054, p = .044)., Conclusion: Females received a shorter course of IO than males. However, there was no significant difference in the treatment discontinuation rate due to toxicity between males and females receiving IO. Toxicity-related treatment change was associated with COPD., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Epigenetic modulation is well established in hematologic malignancies but to a lesser degree in solid tumors. Here we report the results of a phase Ib/II study of guadecitabine and durvalumab in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC; NCT03308396). Patients received guadecitabine (starting at 60 mg/m 2 subcutaneously on days 1-5 with de-escalation to 45 mg/m2 in case of dose limiting toxicity) with durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously on day 8). The study enrolled 57 patients, 6 in phase Ib with safety being the primary objective and 51in phase II, comprising 2 cohorts: 36 patients in Cohort 1 were treatment naive to checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) with 0-1 prior therapies and 15 patients in Cohort 2 were treated with up to two prior systemic therapies including one CPI. The combination of guadecitabine 45 mg/m2 with durvalumab 1500 mg was deemed safe. The primary objective of overall response rate (ORR) in cohort 1 was 22%. Sixteen patients (44%) experienced stable disease (SD). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate, and safety as well as ORR for Cohort 2. Median PFS for cohort 1 and cohort 2 were 14.26 and 3.91 months respectively. Median OS was not reached. In cohort 2, one patient achieved a partial response and 60% achieved SD. Asymptomatic neutropenia was the most common adverse event. Even though the trial did not meet the primary objective in cohort 1, the tolerability and PFS signal in CPI naive patients are worth further investigation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) alongside radical cystectomy (RC), provides crucial diagnostic and therapeutic value in patients with bladder cancer. With the advent of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prospective data supporting standard PLND, controversy remains regarding the optimal PLND extent and patient selection. Nearly 40% of patients may not receive adequate PLND, even though 25% of patients have positive lymph nodes (LN) at time of RC. We hypothesized that PLND still remains an important facet of bladder cancer treatment. To clarify the prognostic importance of nodal yield, we performed a retrospective investigation of a heterogenous population (pTanyNx/0M0) of patients undergoing RC., Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, we identified pTanyNx/0M0 bladder cancer patients undergoing RC from 2004 to 2015. Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models assessed cancer-specific survival. Patients were analyzed with PLND performed as the primary covariate. Survival analysis then stratified patients undergoing PLND by LN yield, both as a continuous and categorial variable (≤10, 11-20, 21-30, and >30), and T stage., Results: The final cohort included pTanyNx/0M0 patients with urothelial bladder cancer (n = 12,096); median follow up was 39 (IQR: 17-77) months. PLND was performed in 81.45% of patients with a median LN yield of 14 (IQR: 7-23). Most commonly, patients had T2 disease (44.68%). After controlling for age and T stage, patients receiving PLND had improved CSS (HR = 0.56, [95% CI: 0.51-0.62]) compared to those that did not receive PLND. When grouping patients by LN yield, survival improved in a "dose dependent" manner (>30 LN: HR = 0.76, [95% CI: 0.66-0.87]). We noted similar results when stratifying patients into non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)., Conclusions: In a large contemporary series of pTanyNx/0M0 bladder cancer patients, we found a significant oncologic benefit to PLND. Higher LN yield correlated to improved CSS in non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive disease. Our data support the possibility of occult micrometastasis even in non-muscle-invasive disease. Additionally, in light of recent advances in adjuvant immunotherapy, our results emphasize the importance of adequate nodal yield for accurate staging and optimal treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interests in preparing this article., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has challenged the conventional wisdom surrounding the radioresistance of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the past decade, there has been a significant accumulation of clinical data to support the safety and efficacy of SABR in RCC. Herein, we review the use of SABR across the spectrum of RCC. We performed an online search of the Pubmed database from January 1990 through April 2023. Studies of SABR/stereotactic radiosurgery targeting primary, extracranial, and intracranial metastatic RCC were included. For SABR in non-metastatic RCC, this includes its use in small renal masses, larger renal masses, and inferior vena cava tumor thrombi. In the metastatic setting, SABR can be used at diagnosis, for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease, and for symptomatic reasons. Notably, SABR can be used for both the primary renal tumor and metastasis-directed therapy. Management of RCC is evolving rapidly, and the role that SABR will have in this landscape is being assessed in a number of ongoing prospective clinical trials. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence corroborating the use of SABR in RCC.

ASCO Rapid Recommendation Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual . The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. See the Appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that represents 25% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases. Treatment for non-clear cell histologies is mostly based on evidence from small phase II clinical trials or extrapolated from successful therapies in clear cell RCC because of the low incidence of non-clear cell pathology. Advances in genomic profiling have improved clinicians' understanding of molecular targets for nccRCC, such as altered mesenchymal epithelial transition ( MET ) gene status and fumarate hydratase ( FH ) gene inactivation, but patient outcomes remain poor and optimal management of this disease remains unclear. This review assesses outcomes by histologic subtype from 27 prospective and 13 ongoing clinical trials to identify therapeutic strategies for advanced or metastatic nccRCC. Vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as sunitinib, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as everolimus, have demonstrated efficacy and remain viable treatment options, with a preference for sunitinib. However, everolimus is preferred in patients with chromophobe RCC because folliculin ( FLCN ) gene mutations upregulate the mTOR pathway. Novel TKIs, such as cabozantinib, show improved outcomes in patients with papillary RCC because of targeted MET inhibition. Platinum-based chemotherapy continues to be the recommended treatment strategy for collecting duct and medullary RCC. Clinically meaningful antitumor activity has been observed across all non-clear cell histologies for immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab. Ongoing trials are evaluating novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immunotherapy combination regimens, with an emphasis on the promising MET -inhibitor cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib., Competing Interests: Yuanquan Yang receives honorarium from AstraZeneca and receives consulting fees from the Whiteoak Group. Eric A. Singer serves on the advisory board for Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and Vyriad; receives research support (clinical trial) from Astellas/Medivation; and serves on the data safety monitoring board for Aura Biosciences. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright: Drobner J, et al.)

Introduction: Despite significant morbidity, radical cystectomy (RC) is standard of care for muscle invasive bladder cancer, certain high-risk nonmuscle invasive tumors and after failure of intravesical or trimodal therapy. Modern efforts have hastened the recovery after this surgery without impact on overall complication rates. Our primary aim was to examine changes in complication rates of RC over time., Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database included 11,351 RC from 2006 to 2018 for nondisseminated bladder cancer. Baseline characteristics and complication rates were studied across time periods: 2006 to 2011, 2012 to 2014, and 2015 to 2018. Thirty-day complications, readmissions, and mortality were identified., Results: Overall complication rates decreased over time (56.5%, 57.4%, 50.6%, P < 0.01). Infectious complications were stable, including UTIs (10.1%, 8.8%, 8.3% respectively, P = 0.11) and sepsis (10.4%, 8.8%, 8.7% respectively, P = 0.20). On multivariable analysis, ASA≥3 (OR 1.399, 95% CI 1.279-1.530) was associated with increased complications, while procedures in 2015 to 2018 (OR 0.825, 95% CI 0.722-0.942), laparoscopic/robotic approach (OR 0.555, 95%CI 0.494-0.622), and ileal conduit (OR 0.796, 95% CI 0.719-0.882) were associated with decreased complication rates. Other outcomes of interest included mean length of stay (LOS), which decreased over time (10.5, 9.8, 8.6 days, respectively, P < 0.01) and readmission (20.0%, 21.3%, 21.0%, respectively, P = 0.84) and mortality rates were stable (2.7%, 1.7%, 2.0%, respectively, P = 0.13)., Conclusion: Decreased early complications and LOS after RC over time may reflect beneficial effects of recent advances in bladder cancer treatment such as enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and minimally invasive techniques. Further opportunities to improve long term outcomes, readmissions and infection rates are needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the publication rates of podium presentations from the 2017 and 2018 Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Annual Meetings; and to examine rates and predictors of oral presentations that resulted in publication., Methods: We reviewed podium presentations given at the 2017 and 2018 SGO Annual Meetings. Abstracts were evaluated for publication from January 1, 2017 to March 30, 2020 and January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021, respectively, to allow for a 3 year period of publication., Results: In 2017 and 2018, 43 of 75 (57.3%) and 47 of 83 (56.6%) podium presentations were published within 3 years, respectively. No significant difference was found between the mean time to publication within 3 years (13.0 months vs 14.1 months for 2017 and 2018, respectively; p=0.96). Similarly, the mean difference of journal impact factors between both years did not reach significance (6.57 and 10.7 for 2017 and 2018, respectively; p=0.09). The median impact factor (IF) was 4.54 (range: 40.3) and 4.62 (range: 70.7) in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Of the presentations published, 53.4% (2017) and 38.3% (2018) appeared in the journal Gynecologic Oncology. Significant positive correlations for the likelihood of publication were determined among the following: funding status (r=0.93) including funding involving National Institutes for Health (r=0.91) or pharmaceutical (r=0.95), clinical trial study design (r=0.94), and pre-clinical research (r=0.95) (all p<0.005)., Conclusions: At the 2017 and 2018 SGO Annual Meetings 57% of podium presentations were published in a peer-reviewed journal within 3 years. Publication in peer-reviewed journals is crucial for timely distribution of clinical information to the medical community., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been increasingly utilized in prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis and staging. While Level 1 data supports MRI utility in CaP diagnosis, there is less data on staging utility. We sought to evaluate the real-world accuracy of mpMRI in staging localized CaP., Materials and Methods: Men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for CaP in 2021 at our institution were identified. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of mpMRI in predicting pT2N0 organ confined disease , extracapsular extension , seminal vesicle invasion , lymph node involvement, and bladder neck invasion were evaluated. Associations between MRI accuracy and AUA risk stratification (AUA RS), MRI institution (MRI-I), MRI strength (1.5 vs. 3T) (MRI-S), and MRI timing (MRI-T) were assessed. These analyses were repeated using Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC) data., Results: Institutional and community mpMRI CaP staging data demonstrated poor sensitivity (2.9%-49.2%% vs. 16.8%-24.4%), positive predictive value (40%-100% vs. 35.8%-68.2%), and negative predictive value (56.3%-94.3% vs. 68.4%-96.2%) in predicting surgical pathologic features - in contrast, specificity (89.1%-100% vs. 93.9%-98.6%) was adequate. mpMRI accuracy for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with AUA RS. There was no association between mpMRI accuracy and MRI-I, MRI-S, and MRI-T., Conclusion: Despite enthusiasm for its use, in a real-world setting, mpMRI appears to be a poor staging study for localized CaP and is unreliable as the sole means of staging patients prior to prostatectomy. mpMRI should be used cautiously as a staging tool for CaP, and should be interpreted considering individual patient risk strata., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests All authors of this manuscript have directly participated in planning, execution, and/or analysis of this study. The contents of this manuscript have not been copyrighted or published previously. The contents of this manuscript are not now under consideration for publication elsewhere. The contents of this manuscript will not be copyrighted, submitted, or published elsewhere while acceptance by Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is under consideration. There are no directly related manuscripts or abstracts, published or unpublished, by any authors of this manuscript. No financial support or incentive has been provided for this manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Kidney cancer is a common urologic malignancy with either laparoscopic (LPN) or robotic partial nephrectomy as therapeutic options of choice for localized tumors. However, renal resection and suturing are challenging steps of the procedure that can lead to complications such as prolonged warm ischemia, bleeding, and urinary fistulas. LPN with a diode laser is an efficient technique due to its cutting and/or coagulation attributes. Surprisingly, key laser features such as wavelength and power remain undefined. Using a large porcine model, we evaluated the laser range of wavelength and power in a clamp-free LPN and compared it to the established gold-standard LPN technique (i.e., cold-cutting and suturing). By analyzing surgery duration, bleeding, presence of urine leak, tissue damage related to the resected renal fragment and the remaining organ, hemoglobin levels, and renal function, we show that an optimized experimental diode laser clamp-free LPN (wavelength, 980 nm; power, 15 W) had shorter surgery time with less bleeding, and better postoperative renal function recovery when compared to the well-established technique. Together, our data indicate that partial nephrectomy with a diode laser clamp-free LPN technique is an improved alternative to the gold-standard technique. Therefore, translational clinical trials towards human patient applications are readily feasible., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

AbstractThe American Urological Association (AUA) and American College of Surgeons (ACS) codes of professionalism require surgeons to disclose the specific roles and responsibilities of trainees to patients during the informed consent process. The objective of this study is to analyze how these requirements are met by urology training programs. An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to the program directors (PDs) of the 143 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education urology residency programs in the United States in 2021. Information was collected regarding program demographics, aspects of the program's consent process, and the disclosure to patients of the role and participation of residents in their surgery. There were 49 responses to the survey (34.3% response rate). Nearly 70 percent of PDs reported that attending physicians lead the consent process. The topics covered during consent discussion include possible complications (25%), expected recovery time (23%), length of the surgery (22%), the people involved (18%), and their specific roles (7%). Many PDs do not explicitly discuss trainee involvement (48.8%) or when a resident is to perform the majority of the case (87.8%). The majority of PDs (78.8%) communicate medical student involvement, but 73.2 percent reported having a patient decline participation of a trainee after describing their role. Despite the AUA and ACS codes of professionalism, many urologists do not disclose resident involvement in surgery to patients. Further discussions are needed to explore how to better balance resident education and patient autonomy.

Because metachronous metastatic disease will develop in 20% to 40% of patients with presumed localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated surgically, research is focused on neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy, to improve disease-free and overall survival. Neoadjuvant therapies trialed include anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) agents, or combination therapies (immunotherapy with TKI), and aim to improve resectability of locoregional RCC. Adjuvant therapies trialed include cytokines, anti-VEGF TKI agents, or immunotherapy. These therapeutics can facilitate the surgical extirpation of the primary kidney tumor in the neoadjuvant setting and improve disease-free survival in the adjuvant setting., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (OM-RCC) refers to patients who have limited (typically up to 5) metastatic lesions. Although management principles may overlap, OM-RCC is distinguishable from oligoprogressive RCC, which describes progression of disease to a limited number of sites while receiving systemic therapy. Cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy are common surgical considerations in OM-RCC, and indications are discussed in this review. It is evident that stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is effective in RCC and is being applied increasingly in the oligometastatic setting. Finally, we will review advances in systemic therapy and the role of active surveillance before the initiation of systemic therapy.

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to highlight the most recent changes in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma, a complicated and ever-changing field of research., Recent Findings: A recent meta-analysis examining combination therapy favors nivolumab plus cabozantinib as the overall survival leader in doublet therapy. Initial results on the first ever trial of triplet therapy have demonstrated improved progression-free survival over current standard of care. The hypoxia-inducible factor-2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor belzutifan is FDA approved for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and is currently being investigated in patients with nonhereditary renal cell carcinoma. The new glutamate synthesis inhibitor, telaglenastat, perhaps confers synergistic benefit when combined with everolimus, but combination with cabozantinib was not so effective. Dual mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition with sapanisertib does not appear to be an effective therapeutic option. New biomarkers and targets are actively being investigated. Four recent trials examining alternative agents to pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting did not demonstrate an improvement in recurrence-free survival. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the combination therapy era is supported by retrospective data; clinical trials are recruiting patients., Summary: The last year ushered in novel approaches of varying success for managing advanced renal cell carcinoma, including triplet therapy, HIF-2α inhibitors, metabolic pathway inhibitors, and dual mTOR inhibitors. Pembrolizumab remains the only modern therapy available in the adjuvant setting, and the waters surrounding cytoreductive nephrectomy are still murky., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)