Search

PDF file - 48K

PDF file - 60K

PDF file - 69K

PDF file - 117K

Purpose: We applied a method that analyzes tumor response, quantifying the rates of tumor growth (g) and regression (d), using tumor measurements obtained while patients receive therapy. We used data from the phase III trial comparing sunitinib and IFN-α in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients.Methods: The analysis used an equation that extracts d and g.Results: For sunitinib, overall survival (OS) was strongly correlated with log g (Rsq = 0.44, P < 0.0001); much less with log d (Rsq = 0.04; P = 0.0002). The median g of tumors in these patients (0.00082 per days; log g = −3.09) was about half that (P < 0.001) of tumors in patients receiving IFN-α (0.0015 per day; log g = −2.81). With IFN-α, the OS/log g correlation (Rsq = 0.14) was weaker. Values of g from measurements obtained by study investigators or central review were highly correlated (Rsq = 0.80). No advantage resulted in including data from central review in regressions. Furthermore, g can be estimated accurately four months before treatment discontinuation. Extrapolating g in a model that incorporates survival generates the hypothesis that g increased after discontinuation of sunitinib but did not accelerate.Conclusions: In patients with mRCC, sunitinib reduced tumor growth rate, g, more than did IFN-α. Correlating g with OS confirms earlier analyses suggesting g may be an important clinical trial endpoint, to be explored prospectively and in individual patients. Clin Cancer Res; 18(8); 2374–81. ©2012 AACR.

PDF file - 128K

This report examined the benefits and risks of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in men with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Palbociclib was evaluated using three independent data sources: real-world data from pharmacy and medical claims, a de-identified real-world data source derived from electronic health records (EHRs), and a global safety database. From medical and pharmacy records, 1,139 men with MBC were identified; in the first-line setting, median duration of treatment was longer with palbociclib plus ET (n = 37, 8.5 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.4-13.0) than ET alone (n = 214, 4.3 months, 95% CI, 3.0-5.7) and specifically, was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole (n = 26, 9.4 months, 95% CI, 4.4-14.0) than letrozole alone (n = 63, 3.0 months, 95% CI, 1.8-4.8). In the EHR-derived database, 59 men received treatment for MBC; real-world response across all lines of therapy in the metastatic setting was reported in 4 of 12 patients (33.3%) in the palbociclib plus ET group vs. 1 of 8 (12.5%) patients in the ET group. Review of the global safety database did not identify any new safety signals in palbociclib-treated men. Real-world data indicated that men with MBC benefit from palbociclib plus ET, with a safety profile consistent with previous observations in women with MBC. Collective data on palbociclib in women and men in this report, including clinical trial data, real-world data, and a well-established risk/benefit profile, led to US approval of an expansion of the palbociclib indication to include men with MBC.

Objective In the PALOMA-2 trial, palbociclib in combination with letrozole prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and exhibited an acceptable safety profile in patients with estrogen receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). This post hoc analysis of PALOMA-2 evaluated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus letrozole in patients with preexisting conditions grouped by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) System Organ Class (SOC). Methods Postmenopausal patients without prior treatment for ABC were randomized 2:1 to receive palbociclib (125 mg/d on a 3 weeks on/1 week off schedule) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/d, continuous) or placebo plus letrozole. Patients were grouped by the following MedDRA SOC preexisting conditions: gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, metabolic, and vascular/cardiac. Median PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) were compared between treatment arms within each preexisting condition subgroup. Results At baseline, 276 (41.4 %) patients had preexisting gastrointestinal disorders, 390 (58.6 %) had musculoskeletal disorders, 259 (38.9 %) had metabolic disorders, and 382 (57.4 %) had vascular/cardiac disorders. Baseline characteristics were similar between subgroups and between each arm within subgroups. Regardless of baseline preexisting condition, palbociclib plus letrozole prolonged PFS compared with placebo plus letrozole. Treatment-emergent AEs associated with palbociclib plus letrozole and dose modifications due to AEs were similar across preexisting condition subgroups. Conclusion This post hoc analysis of PALOMA-2 demonstrated a favorable effect of palbociclib on PFS and a safety profile consistent with previous observations, regardless of underlying preexisting condition. Pfizer Inc (NCT01740427)., Highlights • Preexisting conditions can affect the safety and efficacy of breast cancer therapies. • This is a post hoc analysis of patients with preexisting conditions from PALOMA-2. • Palbociclib prolonged median PFS, regardless of preexisting condition. • Within each treatment arm, AEs were similar regardless of preexisting condition.

Background: In the PALOMA-2 trial, PAL + letrozole (LET) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (PBO) + LET in pts with ER+/HER2– ABC. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of PAL + LET in pts from PALOMA-2 with baseline preexisting conditions grouped by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) System Organ Class (SOC). Methods: Postmenopausal pts with ER+/HER2– ABC received PAL (125 mg/d, 3/1 schedule) + LET (2.5 mg/d, continuous) or PBO + LET. Pts were grouped by the following MedDRA SOC preexisting conditions: Gastrointestinal, Musculoskeletal, Metabolism, and Vascular/Cardiac. Baseline characteristics, PFS, and safety were assessed. Results: At baseline, 41.4% of pts had preexisting gastrointestinal disorders, 58.6% musculoskeletal disorders, 38.9% metabolism disorders, and 57.4% vascular/cardiac disorders. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms within each subgroup and also between subgroups. Within each subgroup, ≥40% of pts also had ≥1 of the other coexisting conditions. Median PFS (mPFS) was significantly longer with PAL + LET vs PBO + LET regardless of preexisting condition (Table). In general, adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with PAL + LET in all subgroups; neutropenia was most common. Within each treatment arm, AEs and dose modifications due to AEs were similar regardless of preexisting condition. Conclusion: PAL + LET showed prolonged PFS and a consistent safety profile regardless of baseline preexisting condition in pts with ER+/HER2– ABC. Clinical trial identification: Pfizer Inc (NCT01740427) TablePreexisting ConditionPAL + LETPBO + LETPAL + LET vs PBO + LETnmPFS (95% CI)nmPFS (95% CI)HR (95% CI)P ValueGastrointestinal17627.6 (17.5–33.1)10013.6 (11.0–18.5)0.57 (0.42–0.78) Citation Format: Karen Gelmon, Janice M Walshe, Reshma Mahtani, Anil A Joy, Meghan Karuturi, Patrick Neven, Dongrui Ray Lu, Sindy Kim, Patrick Schnell, Eustratios Bananis, Lee Schwartzberg. Efficacy and safety of palbociclib (PAL) in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) with preexisting conditions: A post hoc analysis of PALOMA-2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-14.

PurposePalbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, approved in combination with endocrine therapy for the treatment of women and men with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer (HR+/HER2− ABC). In the phase 2, open-label, PALOMA-1 trial, palbociclib plus letrozole significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus letrozole alone (hazard ratio, 0.488; 95% CI 0.319‒0.748;P = 0.0004; median PFS, 20.2 vs 10.2 months, respectively) in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/HER2− ABC. Here, we present the final overall survival (OS) and updated safety results.MethodsPostmenopausal women with ER+/HER2− ABC were randomized 1:1 to receive either palbociclib (125 mg/day, 3/1 schedule) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day, continuous) or letrozole alone (2.5 mg/day, continuous). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; secondary endpoints included OS and safety.ResultsA total of 165 patients were randomized. At the data cutoff date of December 30, 2016 (median duration of follow-up, 64.7 months), the stratified hazard ratio for OS was 0.897 (95% CI 0.623–1.294;P = 0.281); median OS in the palbociclib plus letrozole and letrozole alone arms was 37.5 and 34.5 months, respectively. The median time from randomization to first subsequent chemotherapy use was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole than letrozole alone (26.7 and 17.7 months, respectively). The most frequently reported adverse event in the palbociclib plus letrozole arm was neutropenia (any grade, 75%; grade 3 or 4, 59%).ConclusionsPalbociclib plus letrozole treatment led to a numerical but not statistically significant improvement in median OS.Pfizer Inc (NCT00721409)

Because incidence of breast cancer and comorbidities increase with age, it is important to determine treatment benefit in elderly patients. We evaluated outcomes with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in patients aged ≥65 years.Data were pooled from three randomised studies (NCT00721409, NCT01740427 and NCT01942135) of women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). In PALOMA-1 (open-label) and PALOMA-2 (double-blind, placebo-controlled), treatment-naïve patients received palbociclib plus letrozole or letrozole alone. In PALOMA-3 (double-blind, placebo-controlled), patients with endocrine-resistant disease received palbociclib plus fulvestrant or fulvestrant alone.Among 528 patients treated with palbociclib plus letrozole and 347 treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant, 218 (41.3%) and 86 (24.8%), respectively, were aged ≥65 years. Versus endocrine therapy alone, median progression-free survival was significantly improved in patients aged 65-74 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.97; P = 0.016) and ≥75 years (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.61; P0.001) receiving palbociclib plus letrozole and in patients aged 65-74 years (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.48; P0.001) receiving palbociclib plus fulvestrant; few patients aged ≥75 years received palbociclib plus fulvestrant (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.19-1.8; P = 0.18). Patient-reported functioning and quality of life was maintained. No clinically relevant differences in palbociclib exposure were observed between age groups. Although myelosuppression was more common among patients aged ≥75 years, incidence of grade ≥III myelosuppression was similar across age groups, and febrile neutropenia was uncommon (≤2.4%); no new safety concerns were identified in older patients.Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for older patients with ABC.

1000 Background: In PALOMA-3, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, PAL+FUL significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo (PBO) + FUL (1-sided P6 years of median follow-up in pts with HR+/HER2– ABC who had progressed on prior endocrine treatment. Pfizer (NCT01942135) Clinical trial information: NCT01942135 .[Table: see text]

This phase 1/2 study was the first to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6-specific inhibitor palbociclib (PD-0332991) in sequential combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The recommended phase 2 dose was palbociclib 100 mg orally once daily on days 1-12 of a 21-day cycle with bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 (intravenous) and dexamethasone 20 mg (orally 30 min pre-bortezomib dosing) on days 8 and 11 (early G1 arrest) and days 15 and 18 (cell cycle resumed). Dose-limiting toxicities were primarily cytopenias; most other treatment-related adverse events were grade≤3. At a bortezomib dose lower than that in other combination therapy studies, antitumor activity was observed (phase 1). In phase 2, objective responses were achieved in 5 (20%) patients; 11 (44%) achieved stable disease. Biomarker and pharmacodynamic assessments demonstrated that palbociclib inhibited CDK4/6 and the cell cycle initially in most patients.

Background Palbociclib, a selective inhibitor of CDK-4/6, prevents DNA synthesis by blocking cell cycle progression. A randomized Phase 2 study of palbociclib (P) 125 mg QD for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off plus letrozole (L) 2.5 mg QD continuously compared to L alone was conducted. A secondary objective of the study was to assess the impact of adding P in combination with L compared to L alone on pain severity and pain interference with various activities of daily life. Methods This Phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate P+L in front-line ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) compared to L alone. The primary endpoint was investigator assessed progression-free survival (PFS) defined as time from randomization to objective progression or death. Patient reported outcomes of pain severity (PS) and pain interference (PI) with various activities of daily life were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at baseline and day 1 of each cycle thereafter. The PS and PI scores were summarized by cycle using observed values as well as changes from baseline. Results The final analysis of primary endpoint showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS for the P+L arm (20.2 months) vs. L arm (10.2 months) with hazard ratio (HR)=0.488 (95% CI: 0.319, 0.748) and 1-sided p=0.0004. The most common adverse events in the P+L arm were neutropenia, leukopenia, fatigue, and anemia. For the PS scale, patients in the P+L arm showed numerically lower scores and greater reductions from baseline than the L arm, until the later cycles, when the number of patients had decreased to a small number. The difference between treatment arms in the mean change from baseline was statistically significant at some of the earlier cycles (Cycles 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12; p For the PI score, observed mean scores for both treatment arms appeared to be stable over time until the later cycles, when the number of patients had decreased to a small number. Patients in the P+L treatment arm also generally showed a consistently greater numeric reduction from baseline in pain interference (ie, a decrease in PI on daily activities) until later cycles although without reaching statistical significance at any cycle. Conclusions The addition of palbociclib to letrozole was associated with increased efficacy without negatively impacting pain severity or pain interference on daily activities. Citation Format: Timothy Bell, John Paul Crown, Istvan Lang, Helen Bhattacharyya, Giovanni Zanotti, Sophia Randolph, Sindy Kim, Xin Huang, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Richard Finn, Dennis Slamon. Impact of adding palbociclib to letrozole on pain severity and pain interference with various activities of daily life in patients with ER+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer as first line treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-19-19.

Palbociclib (PD-0332991) is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4 and 6 with preclinical evidence of growth-inhibitory activity in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells and synergy with anti-oestrogens. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as first-line treatment of patients with advanced, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.In this open-label, randomised phase 2 study, postmenopausal women with advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer who had not received any systemic treatment for their advanced disease were eligible to participate. Patients were enrolled in two separate cohorts that accrued sequentially: in cohort 1, patients were enrolled on the basis of their oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative biomarker status alone, whereas in cohort 2 they were also required to have cancers with amplification of cyclin D1 (CCND1), loss of p16 (INK4A or CDKN2A), or both. In both cohorts, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 via an interactive web-based randomisation system, stratified by disease site and disease-free interval, to receive continuous oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily or continuous oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily plus oral palbociclib 125 mg, given once daily for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off over 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Accrual to cohort 2 was stopped after an unplanned interim analysis of cohort 1 and the statistical analysis plan for the primary endpoint was amended to a combined analysis of cohorts 1 and 2 (instead of cohort 2 alone). The study is ongoing but closed to accrual; these are the results of the final analysis of progression-free survival. The study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00721409.Between Dec 22, 2009, and May 12, 2012, we randomly assigned 165 patients, 84 to palbociclib plus letrozole and 81 to letrozole alone. At the time of the final analysis for progression-free survival (median follow-up 29.6 months [95% CI 27.9-36.0] for the palbociclib plus letrozole group and 27.9 months [25.5-31.1] for the letrozole group), 41 progression-free survival events had occurred in the palbociclib plus letrozole group and 59 in the letrozole group. Median progression-free survival was 10.2 months (95% CI 5.7-12.6) for the letrozole group and 20.2 months (13.8-27.5) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0.488, 95% CI 0.319-0.748; one-sided p=0.0004). In cohort 1 (n=66), median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (2.6-10.5) for the letrozole group and 26.1 months (11.2-not estimable) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0.299, 0.156-0.572; one-sided p0.0001); in cohort 2 (n=99), median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (7.1-16.4) for the letrozole group and 18.1 months (13.1-27.5) for the palbociclib plus letrozole group (HR 0.508, 0.303-0.853; one-sided p=0.0046). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 45 (54%) of 83 patients in the palbociclib plus letrozole group versus one (1%) of 77 patients in the letrozole group, leucopenia in 16 (19%) versus none, and fatigue in four (4%) versus one (1%). Serious adverse events that occurred in more than one patient in the palbociclib plus letrozole group were pulmonary embolism (three [4%] patients), back pain (two [2%]), and diarrhoea (two [2%]). No cases of febrile neutropenia or neutropenia-related infections were reported during the study. 11 (13%) patients in the palbociclib plus letrozole group and two (2%) in the letrozole group discontinued the study because of adverse events.The addition of palbociclib to letrozole in this phase 2 study significantly improved progression-free survival in women with advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. A phase 3 trial is currently underway.Pfizer.

1055 Background: The rarity of BC in men limits the feasibility of randomized clinical studies in this population. Treatment guidelines recommend that men with BC be treated similarly to postmenopausal women. PAL, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, is used in men with metastatic BC (mBC) in real-world clinical practice, presenting an opportunity to utilize real-world evidence to enable healthcare providers to assess novel agents in this space. Methods: Two parallel approaches were taken. In the first approach, pharmacy and medical claims data from IQVIA Inc were retrospectively analyzed to describe the treatment patterns and duration of PAL + ET (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) compared to ET in men with mBC. The second approach was a retrospective analysis of data derived from electronic health records in the Flatiron Health database to understand real-world clinical response to PAL + ET vs ET alone. Median duration of treatment (mDOT) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Between Feb 2015 and Apr 2017, 12.9% (147/1139 [IQVIA dataset]) of men receiving treatment for mBC were prescribed PAL + ET for any line of therapy. The mDOT in the first-line setting was numerically longer in the PAL cohort (n=37) compared with the non-PAL cohort (n=214; 8.5 vs 4.3 mo, respectively). In particular, mDOT in the first-line setting was longer with PAL + letrozole (LET; n=26) than with LET alone (n=63; 9.4 vs 3.0 mo, respectively). In the Flatiron Health dataset between Feb 2015 and July 2017, the real-world maximum response rate in the PAL + ET cohort across all lines of therapy in the mBC setting (n=12) was 33.3% (2 complete responses [CR], 2 partial responses [PR]) vs 12.5% (0 CR, 1 PR) for the ET alone cohort (n=8). Conclusions: The real-world data sources used in this study support that men with mBC derive clinical benefit from the addition of PAL to ET. Given the challenges of conducting randomized clinical trials in men with mBC, noninterventional, real-world evidence data appear to be useful to delineate the benefit of such therapies in this setting. Funding: Pfizer.

Background Palbociclib is an oral small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. In the randomized, open-label, phase II PALOMA-1/TRIO-18 trial, palbociclib in combination with letrozole improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with letrozole alone as first-line treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, advanced breast cancer (20.2 months versus 10.2 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.488, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.319–0.748; one-sided p = 0.0004). Grade 3–4 neutropenia was the most common adverse event (AE) in the palbociclib + letrozole arm. We now present efficacy and safety analyses based on several specific patient and tumor characteristics, and present in detail the clinical patterns of neutropenia observed in the palbociclib + letrozole arm of the overall safety population. Methods Postmenopausal women (n = 165) with ER+, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer who had not received any systemic treatment for their advanced disease were randomized 1:1 to receive either palbociclib in combination with letrozole or letrozole alone. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was PFS. We now analyze the difference in PFS for the treatment populations by subgroups, including age, histological type, history of prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic treatment, and sites of distant metastasis, using the Kaplan-Meier method. HR and 95 % CI are derived from a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results A clinically meaningful improvement in median PFS and clinical benefit response (CBR) rate was seen with palbociclib + letrozole in every subgroup evaluated. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was the most common AE with palbociclib + letrozole in all subgroups. Analysis of the frequency of neutropenia by grade during the first six cycles of treatment showed that there was a downward trend in Grade 3–4 neutropenia over time. Among those who experienced Grade 3–4 neutropenia, 71.7 % had no overlapping infections of any grade and none had overlapping Grade 3–4 infections. Conclusion The magnitude of clinical benefit seen with the addition of palbociclib to letrozole in improving both median PFS and CBR rate is consistent in nearly all subgroups analyzed, and consistent with that seen in the overall study population. The safety profile of the combination treatment in all subgroups was also comparable to that in the overall safety population of the study. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0721-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background Palbociclib is a recently approved drug for use in combination with letrozole as initial endocrine-based therapy for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer. This report assesses the impact of palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone on patient-reported outcomes of pain. Methods Palbociclib was evaluated in an open-label, randomized, phase II study (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18) among postmenopausal women with advanced ER+/HER2- breast cancer who had not received prior systemic treatment for their advanced disease. Patients received continuous oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily alone or the same letrozole dose and schedule plus oral palbociclib 125 mg, given once daily for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off over repeated 28-day cycles. The primary study endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population, and these results have recently been published (Finn et al., Lancet Oncol 2015;16:25-35). One of the key secondary endpoints was the evaluation of pain, as measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) patient-reported outcome tool. The BPI was administered at baseline and on day 1 of every cycle thereafter until disease progression and/or treatment discontinuation. Clinical trial registration This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00721409). Results There were no statistically significant differences in Pain Severity or Pain Interference scores of the BPI between the two treatment groups for the overall population or among those with any bone disease at baseline. A limitation of the study is that results were not adjusted for the concomitant use of opioids or other medications used to control pain. Conclusions The addition of palbociclib to letrozole was associated with increased efficacy without negatively impacting pain severity or pain interference with daily activities.

This open-label, phase II study evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of sunitinib monotherapy as maintenance treatment following first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Following treatment with standard doublet chemotherapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin), patients received oral sunitinib (starting dose 50mg/day) in 6-week cycles (Schedule 4/2: 4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off treatment) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was probability of survival at 1 year ≥55%. Of 84 patients who received first-line chemotherapy, 66 (79%) received sunitinib maintenance therapy (median sunitinib cycles started: 2 [range 1-20]). Probability of survival at 1 year was 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.8, 51.0). Median overall survival was 10.4 months (95% CI: 8.0, 12.2). The objective response rate was 27.4% (95% CI: 18.2, 38.2). The most frequently reported all-causality adverse events of any grade during sunitinib maintenance therapy were fatigue/asthenia (55%), diarrhea (36%), and nausea (32%). These data suggest that maintenance therapy may have value in NSCLC, although the primary endpoint of the study was not met.

To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and antitumor activity of sunitinib combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin.Successive cohorts of patients with advanced solid tumors received oral sunitinib (25, 37.5, or 50 mg) for 2 consecutive weeks of a 3-week cycle (Schedule 2/1) or as a continuous daily dose for 3-week cycles (CDD schedule) in combination with paclitaxel (175-200 mg/m(2)) plus carboplatin (AUC 6 mg min/ml) on day one of each of 4 cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated to determine the MTD. Efficacy parameters were analyzed in patients with measurable disease.Forty-three patients were enrolled (n = 25 Schedule 2/1; n = 18 CDD schedule). Across all doses, 6 DLTs were observed [grade 4 papilledema, grade 5 GI hemorrhage, grade 3 neutropenic infection, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 3)]. The MTD for Schedule 2/1 was sunitinib 25 mg plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg min/ml. The MTD was not determined for the CDD schedule. Treatment-related AEs included neutropenia (77%), thrombocytopenia (56%), and fatigue (47%). Of 38 evaluable patients, 4 (11%) had partial responses and 12 (32%) had stable disease. PK data indicated an increase in maximum and total plasma exposures to sunitinib and its active metabolite when given with paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with sunitinib monotherapy.Myelosuppression resulting in prolonged dose delays and frequent interruptions was observed, suggesting that this treatment combination is not feasible in the general cancer population.

Sunitinib is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors with proven clinical benefit in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This phase I/II study investigated sunitinib in combination with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, gefitinib, in patients with metastatic RCC.In phase I, patients received sunitinib 37.5 or 50 mg in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on treatment, 2 off) plus gefitinib 250 mg, both once daily, to determine the sunitinib maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetics was assessed for both drugs. In phase II, patients received sunitinib MTD plus gefitinib to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of this combination.Forty-two patients were enrolled: 11 in phase I, and 31 in phase II. In phase I, 2 dose-limiting toxicities were observed with sunitinib 50 mg (grade 2 left ventricular ejection fraction decline and grade 3 fatigue), and 37.5 mg was declared the MTD. Thirteen patients treated at the MTD achieved a partial response (objective response rate: 37%; 95% confidence interval, 22-55) and 12 (34%) had stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 11 months (95% confidence interval, 6-17). The most commonly reported grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea (14%), the only grade 3/4 adverse event to occur in2 patients. Pharmacokinetic analyses did not indicate any drug-drug interactions.In metastatic RCC, sunitinib plus gefitinib demonstrated comparable efficacy to sunitinib monotherapy with an acceptable safety profile. Dosing, pharmacokinetic profile, and safety support study of sunitinib plus an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor in other tumor types.

Purpose A randomized, phase III trial demonstrated superiority of sunitinib over interferon alfa (IFN-α) in progression-free survival (primary end point) as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Final survival analyses and updated results are reported. Patients and Methods Seven hundred fifty treatment-naïve patients with metastatic clear cell RCC were randomly assigned to sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily on a 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off dosing schedule or to IFN-α 9 MU subcutaneously thrice weekly. Overall survival was compared by two-sided log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. Progression-free survival, response, and safety end points were assessed with updated follow-up. Results Median overall survival was greater in the sunitinib group than in the IFN-α group (26.4 v 21.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.821; 95% CI, 0.673 to 1.001; P = .051) per the primary analysis of unstratified log-rank test ( P = .013 per unstratified Wilcoxon test). By stratified log-rank test, the HR was 0.818 (95% CI, 0.669 to 0.999; P = .049). Within the IFN-α group, 33% of patients received sunitinib, and 32% received other vascular endothelial growth factor–signaling inhibitors after discontinuation from the trial. Median progression-free survival was 11 months for sunitinib compared with 5 months for IFN-α ( P < .001). Objective response rate was 47% for sunitinib compared with 12% for IFN-α ( P < .001). The most commonly reported sunitinib-related grade 3 adverse events included hypertension (12%), fatigue (11%), diarrhea (9%), and hand-foot syndrome (9%). Conclusion Sunitinib demonstrates longer overall survival compared with IFN-α plus improvement in response and progression-free survival in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic RCC. The overall survival highlights an improved prognosis in patients with RCC in the era of targeted therapy.

BACKGROUND. In a randomized, phase 3 trial, sunitinib demonstrated superior efficacy over interferon-alfa as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). On the basis of outcome data from that trial, the authors developed a nomogram for predicting the probability of 12-month progression-free survival for patients who received sunitinib therapy. METHODS. Three-hundred seventy-five patients who received sunitinib in the phase 3 trial were the subject of the current analysis. Nomogram pretreatment predictor variables included corrected serum calcium levels, the number of metastatic sites, hemoglobin levels, prior nephrectomy, the presence of lung and liver metastases, thrombocytosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, time from diagnosis to treatment, and serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was the predicted outcome endpoint. Internal validation of the nomogram consisted of quantification of the discrimination with the concordance index and assessment of calibration. RESULTS. One-hundred seventy-four of 375 patients (46%) who received sunitinib achieved an objective response, and the median progression-free survival was 10.8 months (95% confidence interval, 10.6-12.6 months). A nomogram for predicting the probability of 12-month progression-free survival for patients who received sunitinib therapy was constructed on the basis of a Cox regression model from 11 parameters that were determined before treatment. The concordance index was 0.633. CONCLUSIONS. A nomogram was developed from pretreatment clinical features to predict the probability of achieving 12-month progression-free survival with sunitinib therapy for metastatic clear-cell RCC. The authors concluded that independent validation of the nomogram and additional studies to identify tumor-specific prognostic factors are warranted. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Background Since sunitinib malate has shown activity in two uncontrolled studies in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, a comparison of the drug with interferon alfa in a phase 3 trial is warranted. Methods We enrolled 750 patients with previously untreated, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma in a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial to receive either repeated 6-week cycles of sunitinib (at a dose of 50 mg given orally once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment) or interferon alfa (at a dose of 9 MU given subcutaneously three times weekly). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Results The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the sunitinib group (11 months) than in the interferon alfa group (5 months), corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.54; P

1001 Background: Preclinical data identified a synergistic role for P and hormone blockade in blocking growth of ER+ breast cancer (BC) cell lines. PALOMA-1 was an open-label phase II trial comparing progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with advanced ER+/HER2– BC treated with P+L or L alone. Median PFS increased with addition of P to L to 20.2 mos (vs 10.2 mos with L alone; HR = 0.488), with an acceptable safety profile, leading to accelerated approval by the US FDA. These results were confirmed in the phase 3 PALOMA-2 trial. At the time of the final PFS analysis, overall survival (OS) data were immature with only 61 events in both arms and a median follow-up of < 30 mos with a trend in favor of P+L vs L (37.5 vs 33.3 mos; HR = 0.813; P= 0.211). Here we present final OS results. Methods: PALOMA-1 was a 2-part study evaluating P+L in ER+/HER2– advanced BC. Part 1 enrolled postmenopausal pts with this subtype using only ER+/HER2– while Part 2 enrolled pts of this subtype additionally screened for CCND1 amplification and/or loss of p16. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, OS, safety, and correlative biomarker studies. A total of 165 pts were randomized; 66 in Part 1 and 99 in Part 2. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms. In both parts, pts were randomized 1:1 to receive P+L or L alone. OS data were collected as well as post-study therapy. Results: As of Dec 2016, there were 116 OS events. Median OS was 37.5 mos (95% CI: 31.4, 47.8) with P+L vs 34.5 mos (95% CI: 27.4, 42.6) for L (HR = 0.897 [95% CI: 0.623, 1.294]; P= 0.281). Median OS was 37.5 vs 33.3 mos (HR = 0.837; P= 0.280) for Part 1 and 35.1 vs 35.7 mos (HR = 0.935; P= 0.388) for Part 2. 78.6% of pts in the P+L arm received post-study systemic therapy vs 86.4% in the L arm. More pts in the L arm received ≥3 lines of therapy (37% vs 18%). Further subgroup analyses and details on post-study therapies will be presented. Conclusions: In PALOMA-1, P+L provided a statistically non-significant trend towards an improvement in OS. Survival data from the phase III, PALOMA-2 study is awaited. Sponsor: Pfizer; Clinical trial information: NCT00721409.

A complete response (CR) to therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare but has been achieved in a minority of patients using high-dose interleukin-2. Surgical CR after partial response to immunotherapy in metastatic RCC has been anecdotally reported, although the low overall response rate to cytokines precludes this procedure in the majority of patients. Sunitinib is an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antitumor activity. Clinical efficacy has been demonstrated, with high objective response rates observed in a variety of solid tumor types, including RCC. Herein, we report 2 cases of patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic RCC who received sunitinib and achieved sufficient decrease in tumor burden to permit subsequent surgical resection, resulting in long-term CR.

Purpose: We applied a method that analyzes tumor response, quantifying the rates of tumor growth (g) and regression (d), using tumor measurements obtained while patients receive therapy. We used data from the phase III trial comparing sunitinib and IFN-α in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Methods: The analysis used an equation that extracts d and g. Results: For sunitinib, overall survival (OS) was strongly correlated with log g (Rsq = 0.44, P < 0.0001); much less with log d (Rsq = 0.04; P = 0.0002). The median g of tumors in these patients (0.00082 per days; log g = −3.09) was about half that (P < 0.001) of tumors in patients receiving IFN-α (0.0015 per day; log g = −2.81). With IFN-α, the OS/log g correlation (Rsq = 0.14) was weaker. Values of g from measurements obtained by study investigators or central review were highly correlated (Rsq = 0.80). No advantage resulted in including data from central review in regressions. Furthermore, g can be estimated accurately four months before treatment discontinuation. Extrapolating g in a model that incorporates survival generates the hypothesis that g increased after discontinuation of sunitinib but did not accelerate. Conclusions: In patients with mRCC, sunitinib reduced tumor growth rate, g, more than did IFN-α. Correlating g with OS confirms earlier analyses suggesting g may be an important clinical trial endpoint, to be explored prospectively and in individual patients. Clin Cancer Res; 18(8); 2374–81. ©2012 AACR.

In a randomized phase III trial, sunitinib was associated with significantly superior progression-free survival when compared with interferon alfa as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This article investigates whether baseline quality of life and demographic and clinical variables were predictive for progression-free survival.

Purpose To assess the cost effectiveness and cost utility of sunitinib malate as a first-line treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) compared with interferon-alfa (IFN-α) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) from a US societal perspective. Methods A Markov model was developed to simulate disease progression and to determine progression-free survival, total life-years (LYs), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Model parameters were derived from the pivotal trial of sunitinib, published literature, government sources, and clinical experts’ opinions. The model included trial-based adverse events (AEs). Costs of drug treatment, routine follow-up, AEs, disease progression, and best supportive care (BSC) of terminally ill patients were included. Results were tested using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. Results Treatment with sunitinib is associated with a gain in progression-free years of 0.41 and 0.35 over IFN-α and IL-2. The estimated gains over IFN-α were 0.11 LYs and 0.14 QALYs, and over IL-2 were 0.24 LYs and 0.20 QALYs. Both IFN-α and sunitinib treatments dominate IL-2 treatment; the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of sunitinib versus IFN-α was $18,611 per progression-free year gained and $67,215 per LY gained, and the cost-utility ratio is $52,593 per QALY gained (at a 5% discount rate). Sensitivity analyses found the results to be most sensitive to utility values during treatment, the cost of sunitinib, and the cost of BSC. Model results were robust to changes in other model variables. Conclusion These results suggest that sunitinib is a cost-effective alternative to IFN-α as a first-line treatment for mRCC.

Purpose To assess the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in patients with bevacizumab-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and explore biomarkers for sunitinib response. Patients and Methods Patients with mRCC and disease progression after bevacizumab-based therapy received oral sunitinib 50 mg once daily in 6-week cycles on a 4/2 schedule (4 weeks with treatment followed by 2 weeks without treatment) in a phase II multicenter study. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Plasma soluble proteins (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]-A, VEGF-C, soluble VEGF receptor [sVEGFR]-3, and placental growth factor [PlGF]) levels were measured. Results Sixty-one patients were enrolled. The ORR was 23.0% (95% CI, 13.2% to 35.5%), median PFS was 30.4 weeks (95% CI, 18.3 to 36.7 weeks), median DR was 44.1 weeks (95% CI, 25.0 to 102.7 weeks), and median OS was 47.1 weeks (95% CI, 36.9 to 79.4 weeks). Mean plasma VEGF-A and PlGF levels significantly increased whereas VEGF-C and sVEGFR-3 levels decreased with sunitinib treatment. Lower baseline levels of sVEGFR-3 and VEGF-C were associated with longer PFS and ORR. Most treatment-related adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity and included fatigue, hypertension, and hand-foot syndrome. Conclusion Sunitinib has substantial antitumor activity in patients with bevacizumab-refractory mRCC and modulates circulating VEGF pathway biomarkers. These data support the hypothesis that sunitinib inhibits signaling pathways involved in bevacizumab resistance. Baseline levels of sVEGFR-3 and VEGF-C may have potential utility as biomarkers of clinical efficacy in this setting.

PurposeIn an international, randomized phase III trial, sunitinib demonstrated statistically significant efficacy over interferon alfa (IFN-α) as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) (progression-free survival time, 11 v 5 months, respectively; P < .001; objective response rate, 31% v 6%, respectively; P < .001). We report health-related quality-of-life (QOL) results from this trial.Patients and MethodsSeven hundred fifty mRCC patients were randomly assigned to sunitinib (6-week cycles: 50 mg orally once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off) or IFN-α (9 million units subcutaneous injections, three times weekly). QOL measures included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index–15 item (FKSI-15), and the EuroQoL-5D's utility score (EQ-5D Index) and its visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). The primary QOL end point was the FKSI Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) subscale. Higher scores indicated better outcomes (better QOL or fewer symptoms). Data were analyzed for the intent-to-treat population using mixed-effects models, supplemented with pattern-mixture models.ResultsPatients receiving sunitinib reported higher FKSI-15 and FKSI-DRS scores at each cycle than those receiving IFN-α, with a significant difference in the overall least squares means (3.27 and 1.98, respectively; P < .0001). Similarly, differences in least squares means for FACT-G (and all subscales), EQ-5D Index, and EQ-VAS were all significantly favorable for sunitinib (P < .01). Per pre-established thresholds, between-treatment differences in the mean scores were clinically meaningful after cycle 4 for FKSI-DRS and at all assessments for FKSI-15, FACT-G, and the FACT-G functional well-being subscale.ConclusionSunitinib provides superior QOL compared with IFN-α in mRCC patients.

571 Background: Of the estimated 232,670 new cases of breast cancer (BC) diagnosed in the U.S. in 2014, 40% will have occurred in women ≥ 65 years. In this population, the most common type of BC is...

572 Background: Bone metastases (BM) are common in MBC. They are often the first and only site of distance disease. Patients with BM only usually have a protracted clinical course though increased ...

570 Background: P is a selective and reversible oral CDK4/6 inhibitor. In a randomized phase (ph) I/II trial comparing P plus L (P + L) to L alone in patients (pts) with ER+ and HER2– ABC who had n...

575 Background: P is an orally active inhibitor of CDK4/6. In a randomized phase II study, P + L significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs L alone (20 vs 10 mo; HR = 0.488, P =0.00...

Purpose Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is characterized by loss of von Hippel Lindau tumor suppressor gene activity, resulting in high expression of pro-angiogenic growth factors: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). SU11248 (sunitinib malate), a small molecule inhibitor with high binding affinity for VEGF and PDGF receptors, was tested for clinical activity in patients with metastatic RCC. Patients and Methods Patients with metastatic RCC and progression on first-line cytokine therapy were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial. SU11248 monotherapy was administered in repeated 6-week cycles of daily oral therapy for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off. Overall response rate was the primary end point, and time to progression and safety were secondary end points. Results Twenty-five (40%) of 63 patients treated with SU11248 achieved partial responses; 17 additional patients (27%) demonstrated stable disease lasting ≥ 3 months. Median time to progression in the 63 patients was 8.7 months. Dosing was generally tolerated with manageable toxicities. Conclusion SU11248, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF and PDGF receptors, demonstrates antitumor activity in metastatic RCC as second-line therapy, a setting where no effective systemic therapy is presently recognized. The genetics of RCC and these promising clinical results support the hypothesis that VEGF and PDGF receptor-mediated signaling is an effective therapeutic target in RCC.

Background: PD 0332991 (palbociclib), a selective inhibitor of CDK-4/6, prevents DNA synthesis by blocking cell cycle progression. Preclinical studies identified luminal ER+ breast cancer cell lines with elevated expression of cyclin-D1, Rb and reduced p16 expression as being associated with palbociclib sensitivity (Finn et al. 2009). In addition, synergistic activity was seen in vitro when combined with tamoxifen. As a result of these data Phase Ib safety testing was performed, and led to this randomized Phase II study using a recommended Phase II dose of palbociclib (P) 125 mg QD for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off plus letrozole (L) 2.5 mg QD continuously. Methods: This Phase II trial was designed as a two-part study evaluating P+L in front-line ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Part 1 enrolled post-menopausal patients (pts) with this subtype using ER+/HER2- biomarkers while Part 2 enrolled pts with the same MBC subtype additionally screened for CCND1 amplification and/or loss of p16. The primary endpoint was investigator assessed progression-free survival (PFS) defined as time from randomization to objective progression or death. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, overall survival, safety, and correlative biomarker studies. In both parts, post-menopausal women with ER+/HER2- MBC were randomized 1:1 to receive either P+L or L alone. Pts continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal and were followed for tumor assessments every 2 months. The trial had 80% power to detect a 50% improvement in median PFS (hazard ratio 0.67 [P+L vs. L] with a 1-sided alpha=0.10). Results: A total of 165 pts were randomized in this Phase II study; 66 pts in Part 1 and 99 pts in Part 2. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms. The final analysis of primary endpoint showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS for the P+L arm (20.2 months) vs. L arm (10.2 months) with hazard ratio (HR)=0.488 (95% CI: 0.319, 0.748) and 1-sided p=0.0004. The treatment effects were also demonstrated when Part 1 and Part 2 were analyzed separately (HR=0.299 [95% CI: 0.156, 0.572]; 1-sided p=0.0001 for Part 1 and HR=0.508 [95% CI: 0.303, 0.853]; 1-sided p=0.0046 for Part 2). The OS analysis with 61 events demonstrated a trend in favor of P+L vs. L (37.5 months vs. 33.3 months, respectively; HR=0.813; p=0.2105). The most common adverse events in the P+L arm were neutropenia, leukopenia, fatigue, and anemia. Conclusions: P+L demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS and showed significant clinical benefit as first-line treatment of ER+/HER2- advanced BC. A Phase III study of P+L in this same MBC population is ongoing. Citation Format: Richard S. Finn, John P. Crown, Istvan Lang, Katalin Boer, Igor M. Bondarenko, Sergey O. Kulyk, Johannes Ettl, Ravindranath Patel, Tamas Pinter, Marcus Schmidt, Yaroslav V. Shparyk, Anu R. Thummala, Nataliya L. Voytko, Xin Huang, Sindy T. Kim, Sophia S. Randolph, Dennis J. Slamon. Final results of a randomized Phase II study of PD 0332991, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-4/6 inhibitor, in combination with letrozole vs letrozole alone for first-line treatment of ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1; TRIO-18). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr CT101. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-CT101

Abstract 2940 Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest (pG1) and synchronous progression to S phase (pG1-S) upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with B plus D in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule to be PD 0332991 100 mg QD 12 days on followed by 9 days off treatment in a 21-day cycle with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8 and 11 in pG1 and 15 and 18 in pG1-S (Niesvizky et al. ASH 2010). We present preliminary data from the phase 2 part of the study. Methods: Pts with Rb protein-positive, measurable (as defined by International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) progressive, relapsed or refractory MM after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Prior B was allowed only if there was a response and disease progression occurred off therapy. Pts received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–12 in a 21-day cycle in combination with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response, and safety. PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells were also assessed. The phase 2 part of the study is a Simon Two-Stage Minimax design; 25 response evaluable patients were to be enrolled into the first stage. Results: 39 pts have been tested for Rb and 36 pts (92%) were positive. Of the 36 pts, 30 pts have been enrolled to date including 2 pts who did not receive the study treatment, and 23 pts are considered response evaluable as of the data cut-off. 56% of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1 and 8% had ECOG PS of 2. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.1 (range 1.6–26.2), median hemoglobin was 11.2 (7.2–13.6), median calcium was 9.4 (8.7–11.9). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); 55% had received prior B. Sixteen pts have discontinued (9 due to progressive disease, 3 due to AE, 2 consent withdrawal, and 2 not treated). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (20%), anemia, constipation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 16%); 32% of pts reported grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IHC data showed on-treatment reduction in pSRb and Ki67 in MM cells from bone marrow of 3/3 patients with available samples. To date, 1 pt achieved a complete response (CR), 1 achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial response (PR), 1 minor response (MR), and 5 stable disease (SD); 6 pts are too early for assessment. Conclusions: To date, the combination of PD 0332991 and B plus D has shown response in 4 pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. PD 0332991 inhibited phosphorylation of Rb and cell cycle progression in MM cells. The accrual to stage 1 is ongoing. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubczak:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Employment. Randolph:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Chen-Kiang:Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding.

Abstract 860 Background: PD 0332991, the only known selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6, is reversible and orally bioavailable. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest and synchronous progression to S phase upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. This multicenter phase I trial is investigating the combination of PD 0332991 with these agents in MM during prolonged G1 arrest alone (Schedule A) or together with synchronization into S phase (Schedule B). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of PD 0332991 and the schedule for combination. Methods: Adults with Rb protein-positive, symptomatic, relapsed and/or refractory MM (International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] definition) after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Patients (pts) received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle (Schedule A) or Days 1–12 of a 21-day cycle (Schedule B) for a maximum of 10 cycles. The starting dose of PD 0332991 was 100 mg, with planned escalation to 125 mg or de-escalation to 75 mg. Intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 (with planned escalation to 1.3 mg/m2) and oral D 20 mg were administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18 on both schedules. A 3+3 dose-escalation scheme was used. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which ≤1/6 pts experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with the next higher dose level having ≥2/3 or ≥2/6 pts with DLTs. The RP2D was determined based on the MTD and overall safety and tolerability. The primary endpoint was first-cycle DLTs; tumor response (per IMWGURC) and PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6 activity and cell proliferation by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67, respectively, in bone marrow MM cells were secondary endpoints. The effects of B and D on PD 0332991 pharmacokinetics were also evaluated. Results: Twenty-one pts were enrolled: 9 on Schedule A (3 on PD 0332991 100 mg and 6 on 75 mg); 12 on Schedule B (7 on 100 mg and 5 on 125 mg). Sixty-seven percent of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.9 (range 1.6–14.8), median hemoglobin was 10.9 (7.3–13.4), and median calcium was 9.1 (6.6–11.5). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 1–9); 86% had received prior B. Eighteen pts have discontinued (14 due to progressive disease; 4 due to an adverse event [AE]). On Schedule A, 2/3 pts on PD 0332991 100 mg and 2/6 pts on 75 mg experienced DLTs (inability to receive ≥80% of PD 0332991 or B doses due to treatment-related toxicity), thus the MTD was not determined. On Schedule B, 1/6 DLT-evaluable pts on 100 mg and 2/4 on 125 mg experienced DLTs, and the MTD was determined to be PD 0332991 100 mg plus B 1.0 mg/m2 and D 20 mg. The most common treatment-related AEs were grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia (n=13) and neutropenia (n=7). There were no pts with QTc intervals >500 msec observed on study. The mean plasma AUC(0–12) of PD 0332991 was 539 ng · h/mL in the absence and 555 ng · h/mL in the presence of B and D (n=6). IHC showed preferential and complete (13/16 pts) or >80% (3/16 pts) inhibition of both pSRb and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells before initiation of B and D treatment on Day 8, and cell cycle progression following PD 0332991 withdrawal on Day 18 of Schedule B (7/7 pts). One pt achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 achieved a PR, and 3 had stable disease ≥3 months. Conclusions: In this first phase I trial of PD 0332991 in combination therapy, the MTD and RP2D have been determined to be PD 0332991 100 mg plus B 1.0 mg/m2 and D 20 mg on Schedule B in MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. B and D had no apparent impact on the plasma AUC(0–12) of PD 0332991. Regardless of treatment history, PD 0332991 preferentially and completely inhibited CDK4/6 and cell cycle progression in MM cells, and this was reversible. Encouraging antitumor activity was observed in this heavily pretreated MM population, including VGPR in a pt with t(4:14) who had relapsed on lenalidomide, bortezomib, and carfilzomib therapies and a stem cell transplant. The phase II portion of the trial to evaluate the antitumor activity of targeting CDK4/6 with PD 0332991 using the Schedule B combination is underway. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lentzsch:Celgene Corp: Research Funding. Singhal:Takeda/Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Zonder:Millennium: 10/16/2010 Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event, Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: 10/16/2010 Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event; Novartis: 10/16/2010 Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event; Proteolix: 10/16/2010 Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event. Courtney:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shaik:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Randolph:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Introduction SU is an oral multitargeted inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, FLT3, CSF-1R and RET. Antitumor activity and safety of SU in NSCLC were reported in phase II trials. We investigated potential biomarkers of clinical outcome with SU in NSCLC. Methods Patients (pts) with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC in two phase II trials received single-agent SU either as maintenance therapy (n=66: 50 mg/day on Schedule 4/2 [6-week cycle: 4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off treatment]) following first-line paclitaxel/carboplatin, or as refractory treatment (n=63: 50 mg/day on Schedule 4/2 for up to 9 cycles, or n=47: 37.5 mg/day on a continuous daily dose [CDD] schedule of 4-week cycles for up to 13 cycles). Soluble (s) plasma proteins (VEGF-A, VEGF-C, sVEGFR-2, sVEGFR-3, sE-selectin, sKIT) assayed by ELISA pre-dose and at regular intervals in both trials were analyzed for association with efficacy. Results In the trial of SU maintenance therapy, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were greater for pts with sVEGFR-3 levels < median ratio to baseline (BL) (n=10) vs. pts with sVEGFR-3 levels ≥ median ratio to BL (n=11) at Cycle 3 Day 1 (PFS: hazard ratio [HR] 3.6, 95% CI 1.19-11.13, p=0.0153; OS: HR 3.8 [1.35-10.88] p=0.0074). Median PFS was also greater for pts with VEGF-C levels ≥ median ratio to BL (n=15) vs. pts with VEGF-C levels < median ratio to BL (n=15) at Cycle 2 Day 28 (HR 0.3 [0.12-0.80] p=0.0109), a similar but non-significant trend was observed for OS. While PFS did not differ based on sE-selectin levels, pts with sE-selectin levels < median ratio to BL had greater median OS vs. pts with sE-selectin levels ≥ median ratio to BL at Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=8 vs. n=8: HR 4.4 [1.09-17.56] p=0.0241) and end of treatment (n=8 vs. n=9: HR 3.4 [1.10-10.41], p=0.0251). sVEGFR-3 median ratios to BL for pts with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) ≥6 weeks (n=15) were lower vs. progressive disease (PD, n=5) at Cycle 3 Day 1 (0.57 vs. 0.92 p=0.029). In the trial of SU in refractory NSCLC, for Schedule 4/2 VEGF-A mean ratios to BL were higher in pts with CR/PR/SD ≥6 weeks (n=24) vs. PD (n=23) at Cycle 1 Day 14 (4.1 vs. 2.5 p=0.046). sVEGFR-2 and sVEGFR-3 mean ratios to BL were lower in pts with CR/PR/SD ≥6 weeks vs. PD at Cycle 2 Day 28 (0.4 [n=22] vs. 0.6 [n=8] p=0.03) and Cycle 1 Day 28 (0.3 [n=23] vs. 0.4 [n=19] p=0.043), respectively. In the CDD cohort, sVEGFR-2 mean ratios to BL were greater in pts with PFS ≥ median vs. PFS < median at Cycle 3 Day1 (0.5 [n=13] vs. 0.4 [n=4] p=0.032). Mean BL sVEGFR-3 levels were lower in pts with PR/SD vs. PD (41,498 [n=10] vs. 56,210 [n=20] pg/mL p=0.02). No significant difference in sKIT BL levels or ratios to BL were observed and no further strong correlations were apparent for other analytes in either cohort. Conclusions Soluble protein levels at some timepoints correlate with clinical outcome in advanced NSCLC pts treated with SU; low sVEGFR-3 levels were associated with favorable outcome in all analyses. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4682.

CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2008 Abstracts Abstract #4114 Background: Evidence indicates a direct molecular link between HER2 amplification and up-regulation of VEGF in HER2+ breast cancer. Concurrent over-expression of HER2 and VEGF is associated with a poorer clinical outcome than over-expression of either alone. These data provide the rationale for simultaneous blockade of both pathways. Pazopanib (P) is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting VEGFR, PDGFR, and c-kit. Lapatinib (Tykerb®) (L) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR (ErbB1) and HER2 (ErbB2). This study ([VEG20007][1]) evaluated the efficacy and safety of dual pathway inhibition in patients (pts) with HER2+ adv/met breast cancer. Methods: Eligible pts received no prior chemotherapy or HER2-directed therapy for met disease and had measurable disease per RECIST. Pts were enrolled in one of 2 cohorts. In cohort 1 (C1), pts were randomized to P 400 mg/d + L 1000 mg/d or L alone (1500 mg/d). Enrollment to cohort 2 (C2) began after completion of enrollment to C1. In C2 pts received the combination at doses of P 800 mg/d and L 1500 mg/d. Following disease assessment at week (wk) 12, pts with an objective response could continue on study treatment following re-consent; those with stable disease could continue only where trastuzumab was unavailable. The primary endpoint of C1 was progressive disease rate (PDR) at wk 12 in HER2 FISH+ pts. The primary endpoint of C2 is week 12 response rate in HER2 FISH+ pts. Results: 140 pts were included in the randomized cohort analysis which was previously reported [J Clin Onc 26:2008 (May 20 suppl; abstr 1016)]. Enrollment in C2 has been completed; 40 pts (36 confirmed FISH+) have been enrolled. A preliminary safety analysis has been performed. The most common adverse events of any grade were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, hypertension, and rash. The most common laboratory abnormalities were ALT and AST increase. Efficacy data will be analyzed when the last pt has completed the week 12 assessment. Conclusion: This is the first Phase II trial to evaluate the combination of 2 oral targeted agents in first-line Her2+ adv/met breast cancer. The lower dose combination demonstrated improved response rate compared to L monotherapy. Previously unreported efficacy and safety data from the higher dose cohort will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 4114. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=GENPEPT&access_num=VEG20007&atom=%2Fcanres%2F69%2F2_Supplement%2F4114.atom

ContextCurrent treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are limited and there is a need to identify novel and effective therapies. Sunitinib malate is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which has shown activity in an initial study of cytokine-refractory metastatic RCC patients.ObjectiveTo confirm the antitumor efficacy of sunitinib as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC, the predominant cell type of this malignancy.Design, Setting, and PatientsOpen-label, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were enrolled between February and November 2004, with follow-up continuing until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The reported data apply through August 2005. Patients (N = 106) had metastatic clear-cell RCC, which had progressed despite previous cytokine therapy.InterventionRepeated 6-week cycles of sunitinib, 50 mg per day given orally for 4 consecutive weeks followed by 2 weeks off per treatment cycle.Main Outcome MeasuresAssessment of clinical response, degree of tumor regression on imaging studies using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines. Primary end point was overall objective response rate (complete plus partial). Secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety. Response was evaluated by independent third-party core imaging laboratory and by treating physicians (investigator assessment).ResultsAll 106 patients received sunitinib and were included in the intent-to-treat population for safety analyses. Of these, 105 patients were evaluable for efficacy analyses. The objective response rate according to an independent third-party assessment resulted in 36 patients with partial response (34%; 95% confidence interval, 25%-44%), and a median progression-free survival of 8.3 months (95% confidence interval, 7.8-14.5 months). The most common adverse events experienced by patients were fatigue in 30 (28%) and diarrhea 21 (20%). Neutropenia, elevation of lipase, and anemia were the most common laboratory abnormalities observed in 45 (42%), 30 (28%), and 27 (26%) patients, respectively.ConclusionThe results of this trial demonstrate the efficacy and manageable adverse-event profile of sunitinib as a single agent in second-line therapy for patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic clear-cell RCC.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00077974

Objectives The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Kidney Symptom Index—Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) was developed to assess patients' kidney-cancer-related symptoms. The Rasch rating scale, a one-parameter logistic item response model, may enhance FKSI-DRS interpretation and validate its measurement properties. Methods We applied the Rasch model to FKSI-DRS data from a randomized phase 3 trial in which first-line sunitinib therapy showed superiority to interferon-alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Of 750 enrolled patients, 668 patients completed the questionnaire on cycle 1, day 28 and were evaluated in the current study. The nine FKSI-DRS items were analyzed to enhance interpretation of the summary score by using an item characteristic curve that related score to probability of reporting specific symptoms. Results The Rasch model fitted the FKSI-DRS well: 8 of 9 items had acceptable infit and outfit statistics ( 0.5); item difficulty spanned a wide range (−3.23 to 1.64 logits); and the five response categories performed adequately. The item characteristic curve offered enhanced interpretation of FKSI-DRS: For example, an FKSI-DRS score of 27 (mean baseline score for total sample) indicated a 47% chance of reporting "no" to "lack of energy," although a two-point difference between sunitinib and interferon-alfa, averaged across all assessments (29 vs. 27), corresponded to sunitinib achieving a 28% increase (13% absolute difference) in the probability of reporting "no" to "lack of energy" (60% vs. 47%). Conclusions Data suggest that the FKSI-DRS is an adequate measure of symptom status in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The Rasch model supports its validation and enhances its interpretation.

Purpose We investigated potential biomarkers of efficacy in a phase III trial of sunitinib versus interferon-alpha (IFN-α), first-line in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), by analyzing plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-C, soluble VEGF receptor-3 (sVEGFR-3) and interleukin (IL)-8. Methods Seven hundred and fifty mRCC patients were randomized to oral sunitinib 50 mg/day in repeated cycles of a 4-week on/2-week off schedule or IFN-α 9 million units subcutaneously thrice weekly. Plasma samples collected from a subset of 63 patients on days 1 and 28 of cycles 1–4 and at end of treatment were analyzed by ELISA. Results Baseline characteristics of biomarker-evaluated patients in sunitinib (N = 33) and IFN-α (N = 30) arms were comparable to their respective intent-to-treat populations. By univariate Cox regression analysis, low baseline soluble protein levels were associated with lower risk of progression/death (all P