Search

This study was designed to compare different techniques of managing cleft maxillary hypoplasia and to propose a treatment protocol taking patient's age of presentation, amount of maxillary hypoplasia, and presence/absence of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) into consideration. Five treatment modalities, viz. facemask therapy (Group I), anterior maxillary distraction (Group II), total maxillary distraction osteogenesis using rigid external distraction devices (Group III) and internal distraction devices (Group IV), and conventional orthognathic surgery (Group V), were assessed retrospectively using lateral cephalograms (taken at 3 intervals) and speech records (studied pre- and post-operatively). The results were subjected to statistical analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The mean advancement achieved in groups I, II, III, IV, and V was 4.2±1.54, 9.03±2.62, 11.82±1.18, 10.41±1.42, and 7.24±2.44 mm, respectively. The mean horizontal relapse noted in Groups I, II, III, IV, and V was 2.3 mm (n=8), 2.1 mm (n=14), 3.4 mm (n=10), 1.4 mm (n=5), and 2.4 mm (n=24), respectively. Compared to other groups, group II had fewer patients exhibiting relapse, a statistically significant observation. Similarly, statistically significant improvement in speech outcomes was found only in group II compared to other groups. Based on the results, a treatment protocol was proposed. The authors conclude that the proposed protocol would enable surgeons to decide the most appropriate treatment modality paying attention to not only the age of presentation and amount of advancement but also presence/absence of VPI which is instrumental in deciding upon the most appropriate treatment., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Intra-alveolar extraction of maxillary third molars always poses a challenge to dental practitioners owing to limited accessibility and minimal space for dental forceps application. Dental elevators facilitate the extraction of such teeth. In the traditional technique as described in the literature, the elevator is always introduced from the mesiobuccal aspect of the tooth to engage the space between the interdental bone and the offending tooth to use it as a fulcrum. However, certain situations prevent proper application of the elevator from the buccal aspect of the offending tooth to bring about luxation. One such situation is a grossly decayed third molar tooth, especially from the mesiobuccal aspect with destruction of the tooth substance extending below the cementoenamel junction. Another such situation is observed in patients presenting with thick and inextensible cheeks but a good interincisal opening. In either situation, it becomes very challenging to achieve a good purchase for luxation of the offending third molar. The authors have therefore described a modified technique of tooth elevation, the palatal elevation technique (PET), using the palatal bone instead of the buccal bone as the fulcrum which was observed to be effective in such situations. In the authors' view, PET is simple and quick and can effectively be employed as an alternative to the traditional technique of tooth elevation in all cases that require an intra-alveolar extraction of maxillary third molars., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Sinai Khandeparker et al.)

Purpose: To evaluate the intra- and post-operative complications of tooth-borne anterior maxillary distraction in management of cleft maxillary hypoplasia over a 12-year period, and to establish whether the procedure involves a learning curve., Materials and Methods: All patients with cleft maxillary hypoplasia satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and undergoing anterior maxillary distraction with a tooth-borne palatal distractor between June 2007 to June 2018 were retrospectively studied by retrieving their individual medical records, which included radiographic (lateral cephalogram analysis at three different intervals) and speech assessment records. The presence of intra- and post-operative complications developing in this study period was noted. Furthermore, the frequency of intra- and post-operative complications occurring from years 2007-2018 were evaluated to study whether there was a decrease in the frequency of complications with increasing time. This was done to establish whether there was a learning curve associated with the surgical procedure. The results thus obtained were tabulated using SPSS 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and subjected to statistical analysis using the chi-squared test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: Out of the 458 patients included in the study, 78.82 % (n = 361) had no complications. In the remaining 97 patients, a total of 137 complications (46 intra-operative and 91 post-operative) were observed, making up for a complication rate of 21.17%. The intra-operative complications noted were appliance dislodgement (n = 19), palatal mucosal tears (n = 12), hemorrhage (n = 8), dental injuries (n = 6) and inadvertent fracture of the anterior segment (n = 1). The post-operative complications noted were anterior open bite (n = 24), gingival inflammation (n = 14), appliance dislodgement (n = 13), dental injuries (n = 10), relapse (n = 8), hemorrhage (n = 5), soft tissue infections (n = 4), palatal fistula (n = 3), speech impairment (n = 3), wound dehiscence not related to infection (n = 3), need for re-operation (n = 2), avascular necrosis of the anterior segment (n = 1) and maxillary sinusitis (n = 1). A statistically significant decrease (p < 0.001) in the frequency of complications with each passing year from 2007 to 2018 was observed. Most complications were seen to occur in the first 4 years (i.e. 2007-2010; a total of 74 complications in 54 patients), making up 11.79% of the complications. In the following 8 years (i.e. 2011-2018), 63 complications were noted in 43 patients, making up the remaining 9.38 % of the complications. These observations indicate that a learning curve was involved before carrying out the procedure without many complications., Conclusion: Tooth-borne anterior maxillary distraction in managing cleft maxillary hypoplasia is associated with a wide range of complications: some avoidable and related to surgeon's experience; some related to the surgical procedure itself; and some unavoidable and related to the distractor appliance. Understanding potential complications allows the surgeon to ensure safe care through early intervention and to correctly inform the patient in the pre-operative discussion. The procedure involves a learning curve before it can be accomplished safely without many complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of injury., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)