Search

Introduction: Patients with mild-to-moderate acne are frequently colonized by Staphylococcus aureus on their skin, which alters microenvironmental skin conditions and exacerbates disease symptoms. Bacteriocins produced by Bacillus subtilis may act as antimicrobial peptides against Gram-positive bacteria. Aim: To investigate whether topical application of bacteriocins from B. subtilis could serve as a potential strategy for promoting S. aureus decolonization from acneic skin. Material and methods: The research product was a cream formulation containing 1% bacteriocins from B. subtilis. First, we conducted a 60-day pilot study on the effect of topically applied bacteriocins from B. subtilis on the absolute abundance of S. aureus in 12 patients with mild-to-moderate acne. Second, we designed an 8-week, uncontrolled, open-label, multicentre clinical study to investigate whether the topical application of bacteriocins from B. subtilis reduces the number of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions, as well as Global Acne Grading Scale (GAGS) scores, in 373 patients with mild-to-moderate acne. Results: At the microbiological level, quantitative PCR showed a decrease in the absolute abundance of S. aureus in acne areas after topical application of the research product for 60 days (-38%, p < 0.001). In the clinical study, the number of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions was found to decrease at 8 weeks by 59% (p < 0.001) and 58% (p < 0.001), respectively, compared with baseline. A 56% decrease was observed for GAGS scores. Conclusions: Topical bacteriocins from B. subtilis can promote S. aureus decolonization in acneic skin, ultimately improving the clinical appearance of mild-to-moderate acne. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Giant basal cell carcinoma (GBCC) is a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) enlarged in a diameter more than 5 cm. Since GBCCs are a highly infrequent entity and the occurrence rate is approximately 0.5–1% out of all BCC types, only anecdotal cases are reported, and causes and characteristics inducing development of this tumor are not defined. Objectives: Evaluate causative factors and clinico‐histological characteristics of GBCCs. Methods: The study is a 6‐month, hospital‐based case series study performed in 12 Italian dermatologic centers. Results: A total of 59 cases and 458 control BCCs were collected. No significant differences existed between the two groups if we take into account social or cultural factors. The average duration of GBCCs is considerably longer than controls. GBCCs are located on unexposed areas while BCCs are on areas not usually covered by clothes. Superficial histological subtype was more frequent in the BCCs group, while infiltrative in GBCCs. GBCCs showed significantly higher local invasiveness, and greater metastatic capacity. More than half of GBCCs had been previously treated with one or more treatments. Conclusions: Patients with GBCCs appear to belong to two categories: (i) those who present with GBCC due to delay in accessing medical attention, and (ii) those who have BCCs previously treated with inappropriate strategies. Only very few cases can be carried out with intrinsic biological features of tumor aggressiveness. Social and cultural conditions do not appear to be involved in the development of GBCCS. These observations may help clinicians in selecting correct therapeutic strategies in the treatment of BCCs, which give rise to GBCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]