Search

Abstract Background In February 2021, over one hundred scientists and policy experts participated in a web-based Workshop to discuss the ways that divergent evaluations of evidence and scientific uncertainties are used to delay timely protection of human health and the environment from exposures to hazardous agents. The Workshop arose from a previous workshop organized by the European Environment Agency (EEA) in 2008 and which also drew on case studies from the EEA reports on ‘Late Lessons from Early Warnings’ (2001, 2013). These reports documented dozens of hazardous agents including many chemicals, for which risk reduction measures were delayed for decades after scientists and others had issued early and later warnings about the harm likely to be caused by those agents. Results Workshop participants used recent case studies including Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), Extremely Low Frequency – Electrical Magnetic Fields (ELF-EMF fields), glyphosate, and Bisphenol A (BPA) to explore myriad reasons for divergent outcomes of evaluations, which has led to delayed and inadequate protection of the public’s health. Strategies to overcome these barriers must, therefore, at a minimum include approaches that 1) Make better use of existing data and information, 2) Ensure timeliness, 3) Increase transparency, consistency and minimize bias in evidence evaluations, and 4) Minimize the influence of financial conflicts of interest. Conclusion The recommendations should enhance the production of “actionable evidence,” that is, reliable evaluations of the scientific evidence to support timely actions to protect health and environments from exposures to hazardous agents. The recommendations are applicable to policy and regulatory settings at the local, state, federal and international levels.

Carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S) are elements strongly influenced by biological cycling and redox reactions in soils, but few comparative analyses have investigated the behaviors of these elements with time. Thus, we examined changes in content and isotope composition of soil profiles along a chronosequence (58–212 kyr) of marine terraces on the central California coast, in an area with significant background geochemical research. Unlike in other chronosequences in more humid locations, the total C, N, and S in these soils did not vary strongly with age, possibly due to the retention of phosphorus (P). The total pools of soil N and S cannot be explained by wet deposition of NO3 and SO4 alone, suggesting other sources of atmospheric inputs such as NH4+ and dimethyl sulfide. Total C and N declined in a characteristic logarithmic pattern with depth, while S did not. The ratio of extractable soil nitrate (NO3) to total N declined with depth, suggesting strong biological demand via various avenues. In contrast, the ratio of extractable sulfate (SO4) to total S increased with depth, suggesting that S was in biological excess. We used a simple reactive transport model to integrate the depth profiles of total C and N and their isotope values. The depth trends of total concentrations suggested one-pool residence times of approximately 500 to 1000 y, consistent with turnover times calculated by mass balance. Depth trends of stable isotope values indicated that N is isotopically fractionated at a magnitude twice that of C, consistent with observed 15N-depleted nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions during the dry summer months. The isotope composition of S (total and SO4) suggests some isotope enrichment during biogeochemical cycling, but far less than observed for N. Thus, despite significant chemical weathering and elemental loss over time, the biogeochemical cycles of C, N, and S remain relatively unaffected by soil age in this climatic setting.