Search

Objective. Adaptive radiotherapy techniques available on the MR-linac, such as daily plan adaptation, gating, and dynamic tracking, require versatile dosimetric detectors to validate end-to-end workflows. Plastic scintillator detectors (PSDs) offer great potential with features including: water equivalency, MRI-compatibility, and time-resolved dose measurements. Here, we characterize the performance of the HYPERSCINT RP-200 PSD (MedScint, Quebec, CA) in a 1.5 T MR-linac, and we demonstrate its suitability for dosimetry, including in a moving target. Approach. Standard techniques of detector testing were performed using a Beamscan water tank (PTW, Freiburg, DE) and compared to microDiamond (PTW, Freiburg, DE) readings. Orientation dependency was tested using the same phantom. An RW3 solid water phantom was used to evaluate detector consistency, dose linearity, and dose rate dependence. To determine the sensitivity to motion and to MRI scanning, the Quasar MRI4D phantom (Modus, London, ON) was used statically or with sinusoidal motion (A = 10 mm, T = 4 s) to compare PSD and Semiflex ionization chamber (PTW, Freiburg, DE) readings. Conformal beams from gantry 0° and 90° were used as well as a 15-beam 8 × 7.5 Gy lung IMRT plan. Main results. Measured profiles, PDD curves and field-size dependence were consistent with the microDiamond readings with differences well within our clinical tolerances. The angular dependence gave variations up to 0.8% when not irradiating directly from behind the scintillation point. Experiments revealed excellent detector consistency between repeated measurements (SD = 0.06%), near-perfect dose linearity (R 2 = 1) and a dose rate dependence Significance. This study demonstrates the suitability of the HYPERSCINT PSD for accurate time-resolved dosimetry measurements in the 1.5 T MR-linac, including during MR scanning and target motion.

The output of MRI-integrated photon therapy (MRgXT) devices is measured in terms of absorbed dose to water, D

A study was undertaken to explore the use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for total body irradiation (TBI). Five patient plans were created in Pinnacle3 using nine 6 MV photon dynamic arcs. A dose of 12 Gy in six fractions was prescribed. The planning target volume (PTV) was split into four subsections for the head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. The head and chest beams were optimized together, followed by the abdomen and pelvis beams. The last stage of the planning process involved turning all beams on and performing a final optimization to achieve a clinically acceptable plan. Beam isocenters were shifted by 3 or 5 mm in the left–right, anterior–posterior, and superior–inferior directions to simulate the effect of setup errors on the dose distribution. Treatment plan verification consisted of ArcCheck measurements compared to calculated doses using a global 3%/3 mm gamma analysis. All five patient plans achieved the planning aim of delivering 12 Gy to at least 90% of the target. The mean dose in the PTV was 12.7 Gy. Mean lung dose was restricted to 8 Gy, and a dose reduction of up to 40% for organs such as the liver and kidneys proved feasible. The VMAT technique was found to be sensitive to patient setup errors particularly in the superior–inferior direction. The dose predicted by the planning system agreed with measured doses and had an average pass rate of 99.2% for all arcs. VMAT was found to be a viable treatment technique for total body irradiation.

Wound dressings are used during patient radiotherapy treatments, particularly in cases of radiation induced lesions. Potentially, the presence of a dressing may increase the dose to the skin, further aggravating the skin reaction and decrease the dose at depth. The changes are dependent on linear accelerator beam type and beam quality and were determined for 4 and 10 MV photon energies and 6 and 15 MeV electron energies using a slab phantom and fixed separation parallel plate chambers. Since these dressings have been designed to be used on exuding wounds, measurements were taken under eight different wound dressings in both dry and wet state. Irradiations with photon energies increased the skin dose significantly (max. increase: 68.1 %; average increase: 48 %) with little or no change to dose at depth. Electron beam energies showed little or no change to doses at the surface, but the dose distribution was shifted towards the surface. The maximum decrease in dose at depth was 3.6 % for 6 and 15 MeV through all dressings except one and was therefore considered to be clinically insignificant. A change in dose at surface of 9.7 % and at R(50) of 25.9 %, equivalent to a shift of dose towards the surface of 7.5 mm, was measured for one dressing. This demonstrates that it is possible for a wet dressing to significantly alter electron beam dosimetry.