Search

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if improvements observed in clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes measured at 12 months following a multifaceted diabetes care intervention were sustained at 3-year follow-up. METHODS: This study was a multilevel, nonblinded, cluster design, randomized controlled trial that took place in an underserved suburb of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, between 1999 and 2005. Eleven primary care practices, and their patients, were randomly assigned to 3 groups: chronic care model (CCM) intervention (n = 30), provider education only (PROV) (n = 38), and usual care (UC) (n = 51). Subjects were followed for 3 years. RESULTS: Improvements observed at 12-month follow-up in glycemic (-0.5%) and blood pressure control (-4.8 mm Hg), and the proportion of participants who self-monitor their blood glucose (86.7%-100%), were sustained at 3-year follow-up in the CCM group. Additional improvements occurred in non-HDLc levels in all study groups and quality of well-being scores in the CCM intervention group. All associations remained after controlling for medication treatment intensification. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that improvements in outcomes can be sustained over time following a multifaceted diabetes care intervention. Future research in this area is necessary to understand if improvements in outcomes can be sustained following diabetes self-management education (DSME) and what type of patient fares the best from multifaceted diabetes care interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: To examine factors related to access to diabetes self-management education (DSME), including services delivered and sought; patient, physician, and program barriers to access; educator outreach and expansion efforts; and perceptions of alternative DSME delivery strategies. METHODS: Internet surveys were completed by 1169 adults with diabetes (661 with prior DSME, 508 with no prior DSME) from a national community survey panel, 1871 educators who were AADE members, and 629 physicians (212 diabetes specialists, 417 primary care practitioners) from a national physician survey panel. RESULTS: Physicians want patients to receive more self-management support, but some report that patients are told to do things with which the physician does not agree. Provider (physician and educator)-delivered DSME is more highly regarded among those who have received it than among those who have not received it. Physicians generally have positive perceptions of provider-delivered DSME, and educators see physicians as key to encouraging DSME use in patients. Some physicians are concerned about losing patients sent to DSME, and 11% of patients report changing physicians as a result of DSME. Most DSME programs have grown recently as a result of recruiting efforts and adding new programs/services; most programs plan more such efforts. Patients prefer traditional DSME sources/settings and are moderately accepting of media sources. CONCLUSIONS: Additional efforts are required to guarantee that all people with diabetes receive the DSME they need. This will require increased referral by physicians, increased follow-through by patients, and increased availability of DSME in forms that make it appealing to patients and physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is a critical component of the clinical management of diabetes mellitus. Although DSME is recognized as important, the number of patients with diabetes who receive education is disproportionately small. Several barriers to receiving diabetes education exist, including access and DSME delivery approaches.Objective: The purpose of this project was to explore opportunities to meet the Healthy People 2010 goal of increasing the proportion of people with diabetes mellitus who receive diabetes education from 40% (as it was in 1998) to 60% (in 2010). Our objectives were to examine the provision of DSME in primary care, to determine if DSME delivery in primary care increases the number of people who receive DSME, and to evaluate the effect of DSME on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. DSME was delivered in primary care practices as part of the Pittsburgh Regional Initiative for Diabetes Education (PRIDE).Research design and methods: A nurse who was a certified diabetes educator (CDE) was deployed to provide Point-Of-Service diabetes Education (POSE) to four University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Community Medicine Practices (CMI) primary care practices. The group of patients who received POSE was compared with patients from the same practices who were identified as having diabetes and who received usual care. The number of patients was computed and a percentage calculated for comparison against Healthy People 2010 goals. The HbA1c values of patients were tracked from January 2003 through December 2006, during the timeframe that POSE was provided.Results: Of the 5344 diabetes patients in the four practices, 784 received POSE. Mean HbA1c values were higher at baseline in those patients who received POSE than those who received usual care. There was a significant decrease in HbA1c and LDL-C levels in both groups. Although there was not a significant between-group difference in HbA1c, those who received POSE had significant improvement in LDL-C levels compared with the usual care group.Conclusions: Providing DSME in primary care is feasible and offers the opportunity to reach patients who may not be receiving DSME services. However, further research is needed to evaluate other methodologies to increase access to DSME and other factors that may influence improvement in clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if a community-based modified Diabetes Prevention Program Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB) intervention, for individuals with metabolic syndrome, was effective in decreasing risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in an urban medically underserved community, and subsequently to determine if improvements in clinical outcomes could be sustained in the short term. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This nonrandomized prospective intervention study used a one-group design to test the effectiveness of a community-based GLB intervention. Residents from 11 targeted neighborhoods were screened for metabolic syndrome (n = 573) and took part in a 12-week GLB intervention (n = 88) that addressed safe weight loss and physical activity. RESULTS: A marked decline in weight (46.4% lost > or = 5% and 26.1% lost or = 7%) was observed in individuals after completion of the intervention. Of these subjects, 87.5% (n = 28) and 66.7% (n = 12) sustained the 5% and 7% reduction, respectively, at the 6-month reassessment. Over one-third of the population (43.5%, n = 30) experienced improvements in one or more component of metabolic syndrome, and 73.3% (n = 22) sustained this improvement at the 6-month reassessment. Additional improvements occurred in waist circumference (P < 0.009) and blood pressure levels (P = 0.04) after adjustment for age, sex, race, mean number of GLB classes attended, and time. CONCLUSIONS: Adults in an urban medically underserved community can decrease their risk for type 2 diabetes and CVD through participation in a GLB intervention, and short-term sustainability is feasible. Future research will include long-term follow-up of these subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to present the results of the process evaluation and patient experience in completing the Diabetes Self-management Assessment Report Tool (D-SMART(R)), an instrument within the AADE Outcome System to assist diabetes educators to assess, facilitate, and track behavior change in the provision of diabetes self-management education (DSME). METHODS: The D-SMART was integrated into computer and telephonic systems at 5 sites within the Pittsburgh Regional Initiative for Diabetes Education (PRIDE) network. Data were obtained from 290 patients with diabetes using the system at these programs via paper-and-pencil questionnaires following baseline D-SMART assessments and electronic system measurement of system performance. Process evaluation included time of completion, understanding content, usability of technology, and satisfaction with the system. Patients were 58% female and 85% Caucasian and had a mean age of 58 years. Fifty-six percent of patients had no more than a high school education, and 78% had Internet access at home. RESULTS: Most patients reported completing the D-SMART at home (78%), in 1 attempt (86%) via the Internet (55%), and in less than 30 minutes. Seventy-six percent believed the questions were easy to understand, and 80% did not need assistance. Age was negatively associated with ease of use. Moreover, 76% of patients believed the D-SMART helped them think about their diabetes, with 67% indicating that it gave the diabetes educator good information about themselves and their diabetes. Most (94%) were satisfied with the D-SMART. Level of satisfaction was independent of the system being used. CONCLUSIONS: The D-SMART was easily completed at home in 1 attempt, content was understandable, and patients were generally satisfied with the wording of questions and selection of answers. The D-SMART is easy to use and enhanced communication between the patient and clinician; however, elderly patients may need more assistance. Computer-based and telephonic D-SMARTs appear to be feasible and useful assessment methods for diabetes educators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine nurse and physician perceptions of nurse involvement and roles in diabetes care. METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional design with face-to-face or telephone interviews of diabetes health care professionals in 13 countries from Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. This article focuses on the data from US health care providers. The US sample included 51 generalist nurses, 50 diabetes specialist nurses, 166 generalist physicians, and 50 diabetes specialist physicians. RESULTS: Nurses and physicians agreed that nurses should take a larger role in managing diabetes. Most common differences identified between nurses and physicians were that nurses provide better education, spend more time with patients, were better listeners, and knew their patients better than physicians. All nurses had a high perceived need for better understanding of psychosocial issues and were more likely than physicians to suggest helping patients to take responsibility for their care. Nurses more than physicians also said better communication was needed. Generalist nurses report that they act as intermediaries and facilitate patient appointment keeping. Specialist nurses talk to patients about self-management, teach medication management, have a higher level of involvement inmedication prescribing, and are more willing to take on additional responsibilities than generalist nurses. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased need for more involvement by nurses, particularly specialist nurses, in diabetes care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To determine the use of psychosocial strategies by health care providers in treating patients with diabetes and the factors associated with use of these strategies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of national samples of generalist and diabetes specialist physicians (n = 2,705) and nurses (n = 1,122) from the multinational study of Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs. Respondents were from 13 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Two psychosocial strategies were examined: provider psychosocial care, which provides psychosocial support by diabetes care providers to their own patients, and psychosocial specialist care, which refers diabetic patients to psychosocial specialists. RESULTS: Compared with physicians, nurses perceived significantly higher prevalence and severity of psychosocial problems and used psychosocial strategies significantly more frequently, even though they rated their own psychosocial skills lower. Among both physicians and nurses, diabetes specialists were significantly more likely than generalists to utilize psychosocial strategies. Physicians and nurses used psychosocial strategies significantly more when they believed that more patients have psychosocial problems and that problems interfere more with diabetes control. Referral to psychosocial specialists was significantly more likely when physicians and nurses perceived that professional psychological resources were more available. There were substantial country differences in all factors studied. Compared with other countries, U.S. providers provided more psychosocial care themselves but were less likely to refer to psychosocial specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial strategies are important parts of the diabetes care provider repertoire; understanding their determinants may facilitate efforts to increase their use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of patients' self-reported well-being, self-management, and diabetes control with factors related to the patient's health care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of national samples of patients with diabetes (n = 5,104) from the multinational study of Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN). Patients from 13 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America reported their level of well-being, self-management, and diabetes control. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis (blocks are countries, respondent characteristics, and health care features) was used to examine predictors of diabetes-related distress and general well-being, adherence to lifestyle and medical treatment recommendations, and perceived diabetes control and hyperglycemic symptoms. RESULTS: Country, respondent demographic and disease characteristics, and health care features were all associated with patient-reported outcomes. Better patient-provider collaboration was associated with more favorable ratings on all outcomes, and better access to the provider and availability of team care were associated with some positive outcomes. Country differences were only partly accounted for by patient and health care factors. Relationships between health care factors and outcomes varied across countries. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' reports of well-being, self-management, and diabetes control were related to the countries in which they live, their demographic and disease characteristics, and features of their health care. Opportunities to enhance patient-provider collaboration, access to care, and availability of team care should be pursued. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine whether using the chronic care model (CCM) in an underserved community leads to improved clinical and behavioral outcomes for people with diabetes.Research Design and Methods: This multilevel, cluster-design, randomized controlled trial examined the effectiveness of a CCM-based intervention in an underserved urban community. Eleven primary care practices, along with their patients, were randomized to three groups: CCM intervention (n = 30 patients), provider education only (PROV group) (n = 38), and usual care (UC group) (n = 51).Results: A marked decline in HbA(1c) was observed in the CCM group (-0.6%, P = 0.008) but not in the other groups. The magnitude of the association remained strong after adjustment for clustering (P = 0.01). The same pattern was observed for a decline in non-HDL cholesterol and for the proportion of participants who self-monitor blood glucose in the CCM group (non-HDL cholesterol: -10.4 mg/dl, P = 0.24; self-monitor blood glucose: +22.2%, P < 0.0001), with statistically significant between-group differences in improvement (non-HDL cholesterol: P = 0.05; self-monitor blood glucose: P = 0.03) after adjustment. The CCM group also showed improvement in HDL cholesterol (+5.5 mg/dl, P = 0.0004), diabetes knowledge test scores (+6.7%, P = 0.07), and empowerment scores (+2, P = 0.02).Conclusions: These results suggest that implementing the CCM in the community is effective in improving clinical and behavioral outcomes in patients with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to evaluate the utility of using the 6 elements of the chronic care model (CCM; health system, community, decision support, self-management support, clinical information systems, and delivery system design) to implement and financially sustain an effective diabetes self-management training (DSMT) program. METHODS: The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) uses all elements of the CCM. Partnerships were formed between UPMC and western Pennsylvanian community hospitals and practices; the American Diabetes Association DSMT recognition program provided decision support. A clinical data repository and reorganization of primary care practices aided in supporting DSMT. The following process and patient outcomes were measured: number of recognized programs, reimbursement, patient hemoglobin A1C levels, and the proportion of patients who received DSMT in primary care practices versus hospital-based programs. RESULTS: Using elements of the CCM, the researchers were able to gain administrative support; expand the number of recognized programs from 3 to 21; cover costs through increased reimbursement; reduce hemoglobin A1C levels (P < .0001), and increase the proportion of patients receiving DSMT through delivery in primary care (26.4% suburban; 19.8% urban) versus hospital-based practices (8.3%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The CCM serves as an effective model for implementing and sustaining DSMT programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the impact of implementing elements of the chronic care model (CCM; decision support, self-management, and delivery system redesign) on providers' diabetes care practices and patient outcomes in a rural practice setting. METHODS: In this pilot study, 104 patients with type 2 diabetes and 6 providers in a rural primary care practice were involved in an intervention that included a certified diabetes educator (CDE) who educated and supported providers on diabetes management and adherence to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Care over the year of the project. The CDE also provided diabetes self-management education (DSME) at the office site for 29 of the 104 patients who received their care in the practice. The following variables were evaluated: provider perceived barriers to care and adherence to ADA standards of care and patient A1C, blood pressure, cholesterol, knowledge, and empowerment levels. RESULTS: Provider adherence to ADA Standards of Care increased significantly across all process measures. Patients who received DSME at point of service in the primary care practice setting gained improvements in knowledge, empowerment, A1C, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing systems to support decision support, self-management education, and delivery system redesign has a positive influence on practices and patient outcomes in outlying rural communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: Genetic education Internet sites and peer-reviewed medical literature were reviewed and critiqued to develop tables summarizing online resources for diabetes health professionals. METHODS: Using Internet search engines, each Web site identified for this project met the following criteria: (1) accurate and valid site content based on widely accepted genetic texts, (2) credibility of the organization that maintained the Web site, (3) ease of navigation, and (4) provision of continuing education credits. PubMed was used to find journal articles using similar criteria. RESULTS: There were 33 Web sites on genetic education for diabetes health professionals that met the inclusion criteria. The literature search identified 36 articles regarding the importance of genetic education for nurses and other health professionals, as well as information regarding genetics and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Valid and credible information on genetics and type 1 diabetes is available for diabetes health professionals on the Internet and in the medical literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This Web-based review was undertaken to compile online resources for diabetes educators on genetics--specifically, the genetics of type 1 diabetes--and to provide helpful and accurate information for the public. METHODS: Keyword searches were performed to identify Web sites for genetics education for the lay public and for sites specifically geared toward children/young adults. Web sites were critiqued based on credibility (source, currency, relevance/utility), content (accuracy), and design (accessibility, logical organization). Additional keyword searches were conducted to find sites describing the genetics of type 1 diabetes, which were evaluated for content validity. RESULTS: The Web sites selected for general genetics education contain accessible, credible, and accurate information about basic genetics in an easy-to-follow format with both text and visual aides. Although these sites adequately educate the public about genetics, only diabetes-specific Web sites discussed the relationship between genetics and risk for type 1 diabetes associated with high-risk HLA alleles. CONCLUSIONS: In this genomic age, it is important for healthcare professionals to provide genetics information. Educational tools that specifically address the genetics of type 1 diabetes are urgently needed to fill the current information gaps on the Internet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the release of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), there has been a trend to intensify therapy in children with type1 diabetes even though the trial did not include children of less than 13 years. There has also been a plethora of new diabetes information and technological advances recently. Providing diabetes care, particularly intensive therapy, for the child with diabetes creates a special challenge when insulin and blood glucose monitoring are now needed in school. Regulations in the United States federal laws mandate services for children with disabilities in the school. School personnel must be knowledgeable on new advances and prepared to actively participate in diabetes care. In response to the rapid changes and new information, the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Diabetes Center assessed the knowledge level and needs of school personnel and implemented a comprehensive education program. The program was entitled the 5 Cs of diabetes, which highlighted new information in the areas of cause, classification, complications (acute and chronic), care and cure. The program was presented in six school districts (156 school personnel). A ten-item multiple pre- and post-test was administered. Participants showed a statistically significant improvement in knowledge scores. This study demonstrated the need to provide new diabetes information to school personnel and that the 5 Cs program design was extremely efficacious in educating school personnel. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of outpatient vs inpatient programs on medical, cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. METHODS: Using three large, tertiary medical centers in the United States, the sample of 32 children newly diagnosed with diabetes and their parents were recruited. Children and parents who received outpatient education were compared with those who received inpatient education. The following outcome variables were compared: (1) rates of hospital readmissions and/or emergency room visits for either severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis, (2) knowledge, (3) sharing of responsibilities, (4) adherence, (5) family functioning, (6) coping, and (7) quality of life. RESULTS: In general, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups. A trend was noted in the outpatient group with regard to improved use of emergency precautions on the adherence measure, roles on the family functioning measure, maintaining family integration on the parental coping measure, and disposition on the children's coping instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the safety and efficacy of the outpatient program method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction : Insulin therapy is most effective if patients learn how to properly adjust insulin to achieve glycaemic targets. There is a need for methods and tools that can assist these processes in clinical practice. The purpose of this feasibility study was to evaluate an approach to support insulin dose adjustment in individual patients using a mobile titration application (app). Methods : A cohort of adults (N=36) with type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glycaemia who were starting basal insulin self-titration were trained by a diabetes care and education specialist to use a mobile titration app to guide adjusting insulin doses. Glycaemia, diabetes distress and patient and provider satisfaction were assessed during the first 3 months after initiating basal insulin titration using the mobile app. Results : Mean haemoglobin type A1c (HbA1c) was significantly reduced by an average of 2.1 ± 2.2% from baseline to 3 months (p<0.001). Diabetes distress significantly decreased from baseline to follow-up with scores going down (or improving) across all scales. Both patients and providers reported high levels of satisfaction and positive experiences. Conclusion : The model offers a promising solution to streamline insulin dosage adjustments to achieve specific clinical and self-management goals with high expectations for long-term benefits and warrants further investigation., Competing Interests: Disclosures: Jodi S Krall, Jason M Ng, Kristine Ruppert and Linda M Siminerio had research support from Becton, Dickinson and Company and Sanofi, Inc. Linda M Siminerio also served on an advisory board for Bayer. Neha Mehrotra had no relevant conflicts of interest to declare., (© Touch Medical Media 2023.)

Objectives: To understand the practices, attitudes, and beliefs of type 1 diabetes (T1D) providers towards school-based diabetes care (SBDC), including counseling families and communicating with schools, and explore the barriers and facilitators which affect their support of SBDC., Research Design and Methods: We conducted a national survey of pediatric T1D providers about their perceived support of SBDC, including family counseling and school communication. We used descriptive statistics to analyze results and explored differences by practice size (<500, 500-999, and ≥1000 patients) and environment (academic vs non-academic)., Results: A total of 149 providers completed the survey. Nearly all (95%) indicated SBDC was very important. Though most (63%) reported counseling families about SBDC multiple times per year, few (19%) spoke with school staff routinely, reporting that was a shared responsibility among different providers. Close to 90% agreed school feedback on T1D management plans would be helpful, yet only 31% routinely requested this input. Moderate to extremely significant barriers to SBDC communication included internal factors, such as staff resources (67%) and time (82%), and external factors, such as school nurse education needs (62%) and differing school district policies (70%). Individuals from large or academic practices reported more barriers in their knowledge of SBDC, including federal/state laws. Desired facilitators for SBDC included a designated school liaison (84%), electronic transmission for school forms (90%), and accessible school staff education (95%)., Conclusions: Though providers universally agree that SBDC is important, there are multilevel internal (practice) and external (policy) barriers to facilitating a bidirectional relationship between schools and health teams., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest disclosure: The authors have no significant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Objective: Using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), we examined patterns in glycemia during school hours for children with type 1 diabetes, exploring differences between school and non-school time., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of CGM metrics in children 7-12 years (n=217, diabetes duration 3.5±2.5 years, hemoglobin A1c 7.5±0.8%). Metrics were obtained for weekday school hours (8 AM to 3 PM) during four weeks in fall 2019. Two comparison settings included weekend (fall 2019) and weekday (spring 2020) data when children had transitioned to virtual school due to COVID-19. We used multilevel mixed models to examine factors associated with time in range (TIR) and compare glycemia between in-school, weekends, and virtual school., Results: Though CGM metrics were clinically similar across settings, TIR was statistically higher, and time above range (TAR), mean glucose, and standard deviation (SD) lower, for weekends and virtual school (p<0.001). Hour and setting exhibited a significant interaction for several metrics (p<0.001). TIR in-school improved from a mean of 40.9% at the start of the school day to 58.0% later in school, with a corresponding decrease in TAR. TIR decreased on weekends (60.8 to 50.7%) and virtual school (62.2 to 47.8%) during the same interval. Mean glucose exhibited a similar pattern, though there was little change in SD. Younger age (p=0.006), lower hemoglobin A1c (p<0.001), and insulin pump use (p=0.02) were associated with higher TIR in-school., Conclusion: Although TIR was higher for weekends and virtual school, glycemic metrics improve while in-school, possibly related to beneficial school day routines., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest disclosure: The authors have no significant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to survey parents of youth with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic with school closures to better understand the implications of the school day on health care behaviors., Methods: A cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to parents of youth with type 1 diabetes ≤19 years of age in a large, academic diabetes center. Questions encompassed perceived changes in management behaviors and plans for return to school. Subgroup analysis compared parent responses by child's age, reported stressors, and socioeconomic markers., Results: Parents reported a worsening in their child's diabetes health behaviors during school closures compared to what they perceived during a regular school day before the pandemic. More than half of parents reported feeling that their child was unable to maintain a normal routine, with particular implications for snacking between meals, daily physical activity, and sleep habits. Families with adolescents or those experiencing multiple pandemic-related stressors reported greater challenges. In open-ended responses, families highlighted difficulty in balancing school, work, and diabetes care and expressed concerns about the mental health repercussions of school closures for their children. Nearly half of parents reported being at least moderately worried about return to school, whereas only a minority reported seeking guidance from their diabetes provider., Conclusions: Parent-reported disruptions of school-day routines frequently had adverse consequences for diabetes management in this population. These findings highlight the importance of a school-day routine for children with type 1 diabetes; during closures, families may benefit from mitigating strategies to maintain effective habits.

Objective: To explore the health characteristics of youth with diabetes in cyber school compared with peers with diabetes in traditional brick-and-mortar schools., Study Design: This was a single-center cross-sectional study of youth with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in K-12 education during academic year 2017-2018. Youth enrolled in cyber school were matched with traditional school peers by age, sex, race, diagnosis, and diabetes duration. Comparisons included insurance status, hemoglobin A1c, treatment, coexisting conditions, screening, and healthcare use., Results: Of 1694 participants, 5% (n = 87) were enrolled in cyber school. Youth enrolled in cyber school were predominantly white (89%), female (60%), adolescents (median 15.2 years) with type 1 diabetes (91%). Youth with type 2 diabetes were excluded from analyses owing to the small sample (n = 7). Public insurance was more common among youth enrolled in cyber school (P = .005). Youth in cyber school had higher mean hemoglobin A1c, 9.1 ± 1.8% (76 ± 20 mmol/mol) vs 8.3 ± 1.2% (67 ± 13 mmol/mol) (P = .003), lower insulin pump use (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73), and more mental health conditions (OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.94-10.35) compared with peers in traditional schools. Youth in cyber school were less likely to have recommended vision (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.75) and dental (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.75) evaluations. The relationship between hemoglobin A1c and cyber school persisted after adjusting for insurance status, pump use, and mental health conditions (P = .02). Similar trends were observed for participants with type 2 diabetes., Conclusions: Youth with diabetes in cyber school may be a high-risk population. Understanding the potential impact of cyber school-related factors on health may encourage additional provider/system/school supports for these patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a primary care (PC)-based delivery model on diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) referrals and participation. Despite evidence that DSMES is a critical component of diabetes care, referrals and participation remain low., Methods: PC practices were assigned to the intervention (n = 6) or usual care (n = 6). Intervention practices had direct access to a diabetes educator (DE) and applied patient-centered medical home elements to DSMES delivery. Usual care practices referred patients to traditional hospital-based outpatient DSMES programs. DSMES referrals and participation were examined for patients with diabetes, 18 to 75 years old, presenting to PC over 18 months (n = 4,894) and compared between groups., Results: Compared to the usual care group, a higher percentage of patients in the intervention practices were referred to DSMES (18.4% vs 13.4%; P < .0001), and of those referred, a higher percentage of patients in the intervention practices participated in DSMES (34.9% vs 26.1%; P = .02). Patient-level factors predicting referrals were obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.6), higher A1C (OR = 1.4), female (OR = 1.3), and younger age (OR = 0.98). The only patient-level factor that predicted DSMES participation was lower A1C (OR = 0.9)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the positive influence of a PC-based intervention on DSMES referral and participation. However, modest improvements in DSMES rates, even with targeted efforts to address reported barriers, raise questions as to what is truly needed to drive meaningful change.

Objective: To explore the experiences, practices, and attitudes of school nurses related to modern diabetes devices (insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors, and hybrid-closed loop systems)., Research Design and Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 40 public school nurses caring for children in elementary and middle schools. Developed with stakeholder input, the interview questions explored experiences working with devices and communicating with the health care system. Deidentified transcripts were analyzed through an iterative process of coding to identify major themes., Results: School nurses reported a range of educational backgrounds (58% undergraduate, 42% graduate), geographic settings (20% urban, 55% suburban, 25% rural), and years of experience (20% <5 years, 38%, 5-15 years, 42% >15 years). Four major themes emerged: (a) As devices become more common, school nurses must quickly develop new knowledge and skills yet have inconsistent training opportunities; (b) Enthusiasm for devices is tempered by concerns about implementation due to poor planning prior to the school year and potential disruptions by remote monitors; (c) Barriers exist to integrating devices into schools, including school/classroom policies, liability/privacy concerns, and variable staff engagement; and (d) Collaboration between school nurses and providers is limited; better communication may benefit children with diabetes., Conclusions: Devices are increasingly used by school-aged children. School nurses appreciate device potential but share structural and individual-level challenges. Guiding policy is needed as the technology progressively becomes standard of care. Enhanced training and collaboration with diabetes providers may help to optimize school-based management for children in the modern era., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: The purpose of this feasibility study was to determine the effectiveness of an insurer-based diabetes educator (DE)-driven intervention that relies on systematic restructuring of primary care (PC) linking DE services through population health, practice redesign, and coordinated care for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) identified as high risk., Methods: Two DEs were introduced as members of PC teams and worked with practice-based care managers (PBCMs) to identify and refer DM patients considered at high risk, A1C >9%, DM-related emergency room visit or hospitalization, or reported barriers to care. Elements shown to ensure quality, including population management, diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES), and coordinated patient-centered team-based PC, were central to intervention. A1C, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and body mass index (BMI) were collected at baseline and outcomes were followed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after intervention., Results: For patients who received intervention, A1C decreased on average 1.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-1.5) from 9.6% (81 mmol/mol) to 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) over 6 months and by 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7-1.5) from 9.2% (77 mmol/mol) to 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) over 12 months, indicating durable improvement in glycemic control. There was no significant change in BMI, and LDL improvement observed at 9 months was lost by 12-month follow-up., Conclusion: Findings support the feasibility of a DE-driven intervention for patients with DM at high risk through a coordinated PC approach that improves glycemic control. The feasibility and clinical outcome of this model warrant consideration of a fresh role for DEs in the complex environment of value-based care.

Aims: Understanding the relationship between ethnicity and self-management is important due to disparities in healthcare access, utilization, and outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes from different ethnic groups in the US., Methods: Self-reports of self-management and interest in improving self-management from US people with diabetes (PWD) in the 2nd Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study, a multinational, multi-stakeholder survey, were analyzed, including 447 non-Hispanic White, 241 African American, 194 Hispanic American, and 173 Chinese American PWD (>18 years)., Results: Overall, self-management behavior was highest for medication taking and lowest for physical activity. Non-Hispanic Whites had lowest physical activity and highest adherence to insulin therapy. Chinese Americans had lowest foot care and highest healthy eating. Overall, interest was highest for improving healthy eating and physical activity. Chinese Americans and Hispanic Americans were more interested than non-Hispanic Whites in improving most self-management behaviors. Chinese Americans were more interested than African Americans in improving most self-management behaviors. Healthcare providers telling PWD that their A1c needs improvement was associated with lower self-rated glucose control, which was associated with higher PWD interest in improving self-management behaviors., Conclusions: Diabetes care providers should use patient-centered approaches and consider ethnicity in tailoring self-management support., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)