Search

Purpose:The effect of high-dose imatinib (800 mg/day) on survival in the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected KIT exon 9–mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is not established. Here, the association of dose and other clinicopathologic variables with survival was evaluated in a large multi-institutional European cohort.Experimental Design:Data from 185 patients were retrospectively collected in 23 European GIST reference centers. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to account for confounders. Univariate and multivariate unweighted and weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were estimated for relapse-free survival (RFS), modified-RFS (mRFS) and imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS). Univariate Cox models were estimated for overall survival.Results:Of the 185 patients, 131 (70.8%) received a starting dose of 400 mg/d and the remaining 54 (29.2%) a dose of 800 mg/d. Baseline characteristics were partially unbalanced, suggesting a potential selection bias. PSM and IPTW analyses showed no advantage of imatinib 800 mg/d. In the weighted multivariate Cox models, high-dose imatinib was not associated with the survival outcomes [RFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79–1.94; mRFS: HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.92–3.10; IFFS: HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.79–2.28]. The variables consistently associated with worse survival outcomes were high mitotic index and nongastric tumor location.Conclusions:In this retrospective series of patients with KIT exon 9–mutated GIST treated with adjuvant imatinib, a daily dose of 800 mg versus 400 mg did not show better results in terms of survival outcomes. Prospective evaluation of the more appropriate adjuvant treatment in this setting is warranted.

Supplementary Data from Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients with GIST Harboring Exon 9 KIT Mutations: Results from a Multi-institutional European Retrospective Study

Purpose: hERG1 channels are aberrantly expressed in several types of human cancers, where they affect different aspects of cancer cell behavior. A thorough analysis of the functional role and clinical significance of hERG1 channels in gastric cancer is still lacking.Experimental Design: hERG1 expression was tested in a wide (508 samples) Italian cohort of surgically resected patients with gastric cancer, by immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR. The functional link between hERG1 and the VEGF-A was studied in different gastric cancer cell lines. The effects of hERG1 and VEGF-A inhibition were evaluated in vivo in xenograft mouse models.Results: hERG1 was positive in 69% of the patients and positivity correlated with Lauren's intestinal type, fundus localization of the tumor, G1–G2 grading, I and II tumor—node—metastasis stage, and VEGF-A expression. hERG1 activity modulated VEGF-A secretion, through an AKT-dependent regulation of the transcriptional activity of the hypoxia inducible factor. Treatment of immunodeficient mice xenografted with human gastric cancer cells, with a combination of hERG1 blockers and anti-VEGF-A antibodies, impaired tumor growth more than single-drug treatments.Conclusion: Our results show that hERG1 (i) is aberrantly expressed in human gastric cancer since its early stages; (ii) drives an intracellular pathway leading to VEGF-A secretion; (iii) can be exploited to identify a gastric cancer patients' group where a combined treatment with antiangiogenic drugs and noncardiotoxic hERG1 inhibitors could be proposed. Clin Cancer Res; 20(6); 1502–12. ©2014 AACR.

PDF file - 738K, ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AND METHODS, FIGURES AND TABLES Fig S1- Immunohistochemical detection of hERG1 protein in GC specimens. Fig S2- hERG1 protein expression in GC primary samples. Figure S3- hERG1b characterization in primary GC. Fig S4- hERG1 protein expression in GC cell lines. Fig S5- hERG1USO protein expression in GC cell lines. Fig S6- Effects of the PI3K/Akt inhibition on VEGF-A secretion in AKG cells under normoxic conditions. Fig S7- Immunohistochemical detection of hERG1 protein in GC specimens. Fig S8- Immunohistochemical detection of hERG1 protein in GC specimens. Fig S9- VEGF-A and hERG1 expression in GC samples. Fig S10. Interaction analyses on OS between hERG1 and other clinical and pathological parameters (Forest Plot). Fig S11- Comparison between herg1a mRNA and hERG1A protein expression in GC samples. Table S1- Antibodies used for IHC experiments described in the main text. Table S2- Primer Sequences. Primers were used for methylation analysis and RQ-PCR. Table S3- Cell lines used in the experiments described in the main text. Table S4- hERG1 expression in AKG cells treated with alpha-hERG1 siRNAs and WAY hERG1 blocker. Table S5- VEGF-A and Kv 1.3 expression in AKG cells treated with alpha-hERG1 siRNAs, WAY hERG1 blocker and alpha-vegf-a siRNA. Table S6- Characteristics of patients excluded and included into the statistical analyses and distributions of clinical and pathological variables after multiple imputation of missing values.

Neutropenia is a common side effect associated with nab-paclitaxel gemcitabine (Nab-Gem) therapy. We retrospectively investigated the association between neutropenia induced by first-line Nab-Gem and survival in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma patients. Metastatic pancreatic patients treated with first-line Nab-Gem were included in this retrospective analysis. Neutropenia was categorized using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria scale. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. 115 patients were analyzed. Median PFS was 7 months (95% CI 5–8) for patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 6 months (95% CI 5–6) for patients with grade

[Purpose] The effect of high-dose imatinib (800 mg/day) on survival in the adjuvant treatment of patients with resected KIT exon 9–mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is not established. Here, the association of dose and other clinicopathologic variables with survival was evaluated in a large multi-institutional European cohort., [Experimental Design] Data from 185 patients were retrospectively collected in 23 European GIST reference centers. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to account for confounders. Univariate and multivariate unweighted and weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were estimated for relapse-free survival (RFS), modified-RFS (mRFS) and imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS). Univariate Cox models were estimated for overall survival., [Results] Of the 185 patients, 131 (70.8%) received a starting dose of 400 mg/d and the remaining 54 (29.2%) a dose of 800 mg/d. Baseline characteristics were partially unbalanced, suggesting a potential selection bias. PSM and IPTW analyses showed no advantage of imatinib 800 mg/d. In the weighted multivariate Cox models, high-dose imatinib was not associated with the survival outcomes [RFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79–1.94; mRFS: HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.92–3.10; IFFS: HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.79–2.28]. The variables consistently associated with worse survival outcomes were high mitotic index and nongastric tumor location., [Conclusions] In this retrospective series of patients with KIT exon 9–mutated GIST treated with adjuvant imatinib, a daily dose of 800 mg versus 400 mg did not show better results in terms of survival outcomes. Prospective evaluation of the more appropriate adjuvant treatment in this setting is warranted.

Objective: To investigate a relationship between contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and risk of relapse according to Miettinen stratified risk classifications. Methods: After ethical committee approval, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the preoperative CECT of patients with pathologically proven GIST undergoing surgery between June 2009 and December 2019. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between Miettinen stratified risk categories and the following imaging features: tumor size and location, growth pattern, margins, type and degree of contrast enhancement, presence of calcifications, necrosis, signs of ulceration/fistulation, internal hemorrhagic foci, enlarged feeding or draining vessels (EFDV), ascites, peritoneal implants, lymphadenopathy, or metastasis. Results: A total of 54 patients (mean age 65 ± 11, 29 men) were included in the study with a total of 56 GISTs. Necrosis, ulceration/fistulation, hemorrhage, margins, enlarged vessels, type of contrast enhancement, and metastasis turned out to be associated with Miettinen risk categories ( p < 0.005). Logistic regression analysis identified the presence of necrosis and EFDV as predictors of pathologic risk of relapse (overall accuracy of 89.3%). Conclusion: Preoperative CECT may be helpful in predicting pathologic risk categories of GISTs, as determined by the Miettinen classification system.

e23521 Background: Regorafenib (REG) is a multikinase inhibitor approved as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Although its proven activity, REG can present a relevant adverse profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract REG-related adverse events (AEs) and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of REG in metastatic GIST patients, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule). Methods: Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify GIST patients who had received REG from February 2013 to January 2021. The primary endpoint was Progression-Free Survival (PFS), with Overall Survival (OS) also assessed as secondary endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons. The impact of variables on survival was assessed through univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 152 GIST patients (82 male and 70 female) were included and split in two groups on the basis of the REG treatment plan received (standard vs personalized). Among the 103 patients for whom the treatment was personalized (38 since the beginning and 65 during the treatment course), the main strategies adopted were the following: 120 mg/day d1-21 e28 (n = 56; 54.4%); 80 mg/day d1-21 e28 (n = 22; 21.4%); 160 mg/day d1-5 e7 (n = 13; 12.6%). At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median Overall Survival (OS) was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8) and 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; p = 0.16). Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.3-not reached) and 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5) in the same groups (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; p = 0.00052). Conclusions: Despite the expected limits of a retrospective analysis, we confirm that REG personalized schedules are commonly adopted in everyday clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Based on these results, REG treatment optimization in GIST patients may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy, preserving tolerability and quality of life.

11533 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) with a driver mutation in KIT exon 9 (Ex9) represent about 10% of all newly diagnosed cases. In the metastatic setting, Ex9-mutated GIST patients benefit from higher doses of imatinib (800 mg/day vs standard 400 mg/day). The additional therapeutic benefit from a higher dose of imatinib in the adjuvant setting in this molecular subgroup has not been confirmed. Methods: We retrospectively identified 105 patients (pts) with resected Ex9-mutated GIST treated with adjuvant imatinib (800 mg/day or 400 mg/day) in 15 different European centers. Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Imatinib Failure-Free Survival (IFFS) were calculated and analyzed according to the daily dose of imatinib and relevant clinical and pathological variables. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate survival in univariate analyses, and the log-rank test was used to compare the groups. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a univariable Cox model. A multivariate Cox regression model was also performed. Results: Of the 105 pts who met the inclusion criteria, 69 (65.7%) were treated with 400 mg/day and 36 (34.3%) with 800 mg/day. The risk score (AFIP-Miettinen criteria) between the two dose groups was not statistically different (P = 0.29). Median DFS was 73.0 months (mo) in the 400 mg/day group and 61.9 mo in the 800 mg/day group (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.47-1.47; P = 0.50). Median IFFS was 156.8 mo in the 400/day mg group and 117.4 mo in the 800 mg/day group (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.34-1.29; P = 0.19). In a multivariable analysis, the variables statistically associated with DFS were mitotic count, the longest tumor diameter and the duration of adjuvant therapy. Mitotic count and the duration of adjuvant therapy were also associated with IFFS. Importantly, the daily imatinib dose was not associated with survival in either analysis (Table). Conclusions: This is the largest reported cohort of pts with Ex9-mutated GIST treated with either the 400 mg/day or the 800 mg/day dose of adjuvant imatinib. Although retrospective in nature, the data confirm the prognostic value of mitotic count and suggest that patients with Ex9-mutated GIST derive no additional survival benefit from the 800 mg/day dose. [Table: see text]

[Introduction] Desmoid tumour (DT) is a locally aggressive fibroblastic proliferative disease representing the most common extraintestinal manifestation of familial adenomatosis polyposis (FAP). As data on the activity of chemotherapy in these patients are limited, we examined the outcomes of patients treated with low-dose methotrexate (MTX)+vinca alkaloids (vinorelbine or vinblastine)., [Patients and methods] We retrospectively reviewed clinical and outcome data from all patients with confirmed FAP-associated DTs treated with weekly MTX+vinca alkaloids in seven European sarcoma reference centres between January 2000 and December 2018. Radiological responses were assessed using RECIST V.1.0 and V.1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method associated to the log-rank test was used to estimate and compare survival curves., [Results] We identified 37 patients (median age 29 years, range 7–44). According to RECIST, 20/37 (54.1%) patients achieved partial response (PR), 15/37 (40.5%) patients had stable disease and 2/37 (5.4%) had progressive disease as best response. Overall, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.5 years (range, 0.3–12.1 years). In the subset of patients achieving PR as best response, the median PFS was not reached. In a subset of 11 patients with progressive disease offered MTX+vinca alkaloids rechallenge (after chemotherapy withdrawal following prolonged disease control), the disease control rate was 100%, resulting in a median PFS after rechallenge of 5.8 years., [Conclusions] This is the largest series on the activity of low-dose chemotherapy in patients with FAP-related DT. In this population, MTX+vinca alkaloids is an active combination, as already reported in patients with sporadic DT.

Robotic surgery has been proposed over the last decade as a valid option to treat gastrointestinal malignancies in a minimally invasive method, yielding encouraging results. The authors examine the outcomes of a consecutive series of patients with stromal gastrointestinal neoplasms who were operated on using a totally robotic technique. There were 36 patients in the study, with median age 70 years. Resected tumors were located in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine and rectum. Perioperative morbidity was 8% and no mortality occurred. R0 resection was achieved in all cases. At a median follow-up of 25 months, 35 patients were disease free while there was one case of death related to metastatic disease. Robotic surgery is a valid option to resect gastrointestinal stromal tumors anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract in a minimally invasive manner.

Background Despite its proven activity as third-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), regorafenib can present a poor tolerability profile which often leads to treatment modifications and transient or permanent discontinuation; thus, in clinical practice physicians usually adopt various dosing and interval schedules to counteract regorafenib-related adverse events and avoid treatment interruption. The aim of this real-world study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of personalized schedules of regorafenib in patients with metastatic GIST, in comparison with the standard schedule (160 mg daily, 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off). Patients and methods Institutional registries across seven Italian reference centers were retrospectively reviewed and data of interest retrieved to identify patients with GIST who had received regorafenib from February 2013 to January 2021. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival and the log-rank test to make comparisons. Results Of a total of 152 patients with GIST, 49 were treated with standard dose, while 103 received personalized schedules. At a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.73-11.0 months] versus 9.7 months (95% CI 7.9-14.5 months) in the standard-dose and the personalized schedule groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.34-0.75; P = 0.00052]. Median overall survival was 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-21.8 months) versus 20.5 months (95% CI 15.0-25.4 months), respectively (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.22; P = 0.16). Conclusions Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice of high-volume GIST expert centers and correlate with significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, regorafenib treatment optimization in patients with GIST may represent the best strategy to maximize long-term therapy., Highlights • Regorafenib-personalized schedules are commonly adopted in daily clinical practice. • Regorafenib-personalized schedules correlate with statistically significant improvement of therapeutic outcomes. • A prompt personalization of regorafenib could help clinicians avoid early treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. • A patient-tailored approach could be applied to other metastatic solid tumors treated with regorafenib.

Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is a common condition in oncological patients. However, its management is still suboptimal. Improved knowledge of BTcP and its management in clinical practice may have immediate importance for all physicians involved in the supportive care of cancer patients. This review critically discusses the most important concepts for the correct diagnosis of BTcP and presents some intriguing cases of the management of this condition in clinical practice. Overall, the most appropriate therapeutic choice appears to be a rapid-onset opioid (ROO), and in particular, the nasal route of administration is the quickest and most convenient mode of administration for the management of BTcP, especially when the patient needs rapid resolution of pain. To this end, intranasal fentanyl spray may have a particular relevance in clinical practice. Future research should focus on accepted definitions of BTcP to investigate the optimal management of this highly heterogeneous pain condition. Therapeutic decision-making of patients, clinicians, and payers will likely be driven from results of well-designed clinical trials of ROOs., Video abstract

e23520 Background: In adult GISTs are frequently sporadic, while rarely GISTs are linked to Carney Triad and Carney-Stratakis Syndrome and NF1. GISTs with second primary tumors are reported in 4-33% of patients in literature and genetic counseling is suggested to explore an underlying germline mutations pathway. Methods: In our Academic Hospital Centre (EURACAN member) in Florence, Italy, we are following patients with GIST and multiple primary tumors with genetic counseling (72 GISTs with second tumors/185 patients with GIST) and germline analysis of the following genetic panel is performed as clinically indicated: BRCA1, BRCA2, MUTYH, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, CDH1, ATM, TP53, PTEN, CHECK2, PALB2, BARD1, BRIP1, BLM, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, PMS2, MRE11A, RAD50, NBN, FAM175A, EPKAM, TSK1, MEN1 by sequencing analysis with Illumina MiSeq by kit multiplicom BRCA Hereditary cancer Mastr plus, and bioinformatic analysis by software SOPHIADDM (Sophia genetics) for point genetic alterations of BRCA1 NM_007294.3, BRCA2 NM_000059.3, MUTYH NM_000249, MSH2 NM_000251, MSH6 NM_000179, CDH1 NM_00444360, ATM NM_000051, TP53 NM_000546, PTEN NM_000314, CHEK2 NM_001005735, PALB2 NM_024675, BARD1 NM_000465, BRIP1 NM_032043, BLM NM_000057, RAD51C NM_002876, RAD51D NM_001142571, XRCC2 NM_005431, PMS2 NM_000535, MRE11A NM_005590, RAD50 NM_006732, NBN NM_002485, FAM175A NM_139076, EPCAM NM_002354, STK1 NM_000455, MEN1 NM_000244 and MLPA (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification) test analysis for patients with kit P087-BRCA1,P045-BRCA2(CHEK2, P248-MLH1-MSH2, P003-MLH1/MSH2, P072-MSH6-MUTYH (MRC-Holland). Results: In 3 patients germline mutations have been observed: 1 patient showed the c.1192dupG, p.(Ala398Glyfs*19) pathogenic mutation in exon 7 of MSH2 gene, confirmed by Sanger Sequencing, 1 patient showed c.565-?_1130+?del mutation consisting in heterozygous 3-4-5-6 exons deletion of MSH2 gene, confirmed by MLPA analysis, and in 1 patient the following ATM alteration has been identified in heterozygosis: ATM c.5319+2T > C, p.(?). In the 2 patients with Lynch syndrome with colon adenocarcinoma (MSI-H), synchronous GISTs (1 patient quadruple WT and 1 patient kit ex 11 mutated ) were diagnosed; in the patient with ATM mutation, the diagnosis of GIST (kit ex 11 mutated) occurred after prostate adenocarcinoma and before colon adenocarcinoma (MSI-H). Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that GIST diagnosis could be tumor-related to multiple hereditary tumor syndromes as Lynch Syndrome and Ataxia-Teleangectasia syndrome, the latter being linked in eterozygosis to tumor susceptibility to breast in female. This report represents a high value in terms of genetic counseling for relatives and in terms of therapeutic implications for the patients.

e23518 Background: In patients with GIST, literature reports a risk of second primary tumors between 4.5% and 33% with different distribution in the worldwide. The network of 7 italian EURACAN centers has collected clinical and molecular features of GIST patients with second primary tumors. Methods: We reviewed the clinical characteristics of 201 patients with GIST and second primary tumors in order to evaluate association between risk of dead and each possible factor, using Kaplan meier curve, log-rank test and Cox model for Hazard Ratio and it’s interval Confidence 95% estimation. Furthermore, NGS analysis ( 56 gene onco panel) in 72 patients with GIST was performed. Results: On the basis of the significant correlation previously observed between the Miettinen risk criteria of GIST (low/very low) and the incidence of second primary tumors (gastrointestinal tumors),P < 0.001 (Abstr 11032 ASCO 2019), we observed in these patients a median age of diagnosis of GIST of 68, with prevalent gastric site localization ( KIT exon 11 mutation), NF1 and Lynch (kit/pdgfra WT) syndromes in the low risk subgroup. The more frequent site of second epithelial tumor in gastrointestinal tract was the colon followed by gastric, pancreatic and biliary tract. In patients with GIST with low-very low risk according Miettinen classification, after a median follow-up period of 25 years, we have observed that the gastroenteric site of second tumors occurrence is significantly related to the survival (p < .0003). In the NGS analysis of the GIST we observed the pathogenetic somatic mutations in the following genes: BRCA 2 (p.Thr2125fs), but germline test negative, TP53 (p.Arg192*,p.Gly244Ser,p.His168Leu), RET (p.Lys120Asn, p.His168Leu, p.Thr930Met ), NRAS (p.Gly134Asp), CTNNB1 (p.Ser45Phe), MSH6 (P.Ala164Val), SMARCB1 (p.Arg192), VHL (p.Gly93Val), PTEN(p.Val158Ile, p.Asn323fs), STK1I (p.Arg40Cys), SMO (p.Glu194Lys), EGFR (p.Gly721Asp), ATM (p.Asp2708Asn), ERBB4 (p.Asn181Ile). Conclusions: In our analysis patients with GIST (low-very low classes according to Miettinen) have significant risk to death because of second primary tumors in gastrointestinal tract. Specific attention to gastrointestinal screening during the follow-up of GIST (low and very low risk) is required.

Primary bone tumours are rare, accounting for < 0.2% of malignant neoplasms registered in the EUROCARE (European Cancer Registry based study on survival and care of cancer patients) database. Different bone tumour subtypes have distinct patterns of incidence, and each has no more than 0.3 incident cases per 100 000 per year. Osteosarcoma (OS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) have a relatively high incidence in the second decade of life, whereas chondrosarcoma (CS) is more common in older age.

Background: Rechallenge with imatinib is an option in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients following progression with standard tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib. We retrospectively collected data from metastatic Italian GIST patients treated with imatinib resumption after progression to conventional TKIs. Methods: A total of 104 eligible advanced GIST patients, previously treated with imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib, were collected from six referral Italian institutions. Mutational analysis was recorded and correlated with survival and response according to RECIST 1.1 or CHOI criteria. Results: Overall, 71 patients treated with imatinib 400 mg as rechallenge were included. Mutational status was available in all patients. The median follow up was 13 months. In patients who received a rechallenge therapy, the median time to progression (TTP) was 5.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9–13.5] and overall survival (OS) was 10.6 months (95% CI 2.8–26.9). A correlation between mutational status, response rate, TTP and OS was not found but comparing deleted versus nondeleted KIT exon 11 patients, a significant difference was identified in terms of TTP and OS ( p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Our retrospective data confirm that imatinib rechallenge is a reasonable option in advanced GIST. The prognostic value of the specific KIT mutations was confirmed in our series.

11032 Background: GISTs are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract. As of recent, new links are being made between GISTS and secondary malignancies. However, whether the coexistence of GISTs with other tumors is stochastic, or the result of related pathogenetic mechanisms is still unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and molecular features from all GIST patients with second tumors treated in seven Italian GIST reference centers. Qualitative variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results: Clinical data of 184 patients with diagnosis of GIST were evaluated. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years, KIT exon 11 resulted the most frequent mutation (73%) while seven patients (3.8%) had a genetic syndrome. The most common primary GIST localizations were stomach (54%) and small intestine (33%). Second tumors arose mostly from gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract. Fourtythree patients had two primary tumors other than GIST and five patients had three other primary malignancies. According to Miettinen criteria, 45% of non-metastatic patients at diagnosis belong to low or very low-risk classes. We highlighted a significant correlation (P=0.002) between risk class and second/third tumor localization, with considerably high percentage of GI second malignancies in low/very low risk GISTs (table). Conclusions: The high frequency of second/third tumors reported in low and very low GIST calls for a careful follow-up also in these patients. Furthermore, this population requires further genetic investigation, NGS analysis is ongoing. [Table: see text]

BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify new markers to assess recurrence risk in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We explored the prognostic impact of ether-a-gò-gò-related gene 1 channels and some hypoxia markers, in patients with nonmetastatic (stage I, II, and III) CRC. METHODS: The expression of hERG1, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), glucose transporter 1, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R), and p53 was tested by immunohistochemistry in 135 patients. The median follow-up was 35 months. Clinicopathologic parameters and overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: hERG1 displayed a statistically significant association with Glut-1, VEGF-A, CA-IX, and EGF-R; p53 with VEGF-A and CA-IX; Glut-1 with the age of the patients; and EGF-R with TNM and mucin content. TNM and CA-IX were prognostic factors at the univariate analysis; TNM, hERG1, and Glut-1, at the multivariate analysis. Risk scores calculated from the final multivariate model allowed to stratify patients into four different risk groups: A) stage I-II, Glut-1 positivity, any hERG1; B) stage I-II, Glut-1 and hERG1 negativity; C) stage I-II, Glut-1 negativity, hERG1 positivity; D) stage III, any Glut-1 and any hERG1. CONCLUSIONS: hERG1 positivity with Glut-1 negativity identifies a patient group with poor prognosis within stage I-II CRC. The possibility that these patients might benefit from adjuvant therapy, independently from the TNM stage, is discussed. IMPACT: More robust prognostic and predictive markers, supplementing standard clinical and pathologic staging, are needed for node-negative patients.

11556Background: Desmoid tumours (DTs) are monoclonal neoplasms with fibroblastic-myofibroblastic differentiation and they represent the most common extra-intestinal manifestation of familial adeno...

This study was performed to determine the activity of adding continuous infusion (CI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to gemcitabine (GEM) vs GEM alone in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). In all, 94 chemo-naïve patients with APC were randomised to receive GEM alone (arm A: 1000 mg m(-2) per week for 7 weeks followed by a 2 week rest period, then weekly for 3 consecutive weeks out of every 4 weeks) or in combination with CI 5-FU (arm B: CI 5-FU 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 6 weeks followed by a 2 week rest period, then for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Overall response rate (RR) was the primary end point and criteria for decision were planned according to the Simon's optimal two-stage design. The overall RR was 8% (arm A) and 11% (arm B) (95% confidence interval: 0.5-16% and 2-22%), respectively, and stable disease was 29 and 28%. The median duration of RR was 34 weeks (range 25-101 weeks) for GEM and 26 weeks (range 16-46 weeks) for the combination. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14 weeks (range 2-65 weeks) and 18 weeks (range 4-51 weeks), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 31 weeks (range 1-101 weeks) and 30 weeks (1-101 weeks). Toxicity was mild in both arms. This study does not show promising activity in terms of RR, PFS and OS for the double combination arm in APC.

In a previous dose-finding trial, in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), we showed that the combination of Mitoxantrone (M) and Paclitaxel (P) may be an interesting (response rate: 69%) and well-tolerated regimen. On the basis of these results, our group started a new trial in chemotherapy-naive patients with MBC.Forty-six women entered in this trial, and all patients were evaluated for response and toxicity. Schedule of treatment was P 175 mg/m2 over 3 hr day 1 and M 12 mg/m2 day 1, every 3 weeks. Patients were reevaluated every 3 months and chemotherapy was continued unless tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.The intent-to-treat objective response was 61% (95% confidence interval: 49%-78%). Five patients (11%) obtained complete response and 23 (50%) partial response with a median time to failure of 14 months. The median survival was 22 months (range 1-39). The principal toxicity was hematological: 38 (82%) patients had grade 3 to 4 leukopenia; only 2 patients had grade 4 anemia and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematological toxicity (grade 3-4) was mild and cardiotoxicity was infrequent.This trial suggests the combination of M and P is an active palliative regimen for patients with MBC. Toxicity was moderate. The infrequent development of cardiotoxicity suggests this combination may not share the problems reported with P plus doxorubicin combinations.

Background: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) and cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-FU (PELF) have both been reported to be superior to the combination 5-FU, doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM) in advanced gastric carcinoma. On the basis of the presence and dose intensity of the included agents, we hypothesised that PELF would be superior to FAMTX. Patients and methods: Two hundred patients with untreated advanced gastric carcinoma were randomised to receive PELF or FAMTX for a maximum of six cycles or until disease progression. Results: The complete response (CR) rates to PELF and FAMTX were, respectively, 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 6% to 20%] and 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%; P = 0.003), and the objective response rates [CR plus partial response (PR) rates] 39% (95% CI 29% to 49%) and 22% (95% CI 13% to 30%; P = 0.009), thus significantly favouring the PELF combination. The survival rates after 12 months (30.8% versus 22.4%) and 24 months (15.7% versus 9.5%) were also higher among patients receiving PELF, but these differences were not statistically significant. The toxicities were qualitatively different but quantitatively similar. Both regimens seem to be feasible provided that careful patient monitoring is assured. Conclusions: PELF is significantly more active than FAMTX and deserves further research in the adjuvant

11038 Background: We retrospectively collected data from metastatic Italian GIST patients treated with imatinib or sunitinib reintroduction after progression to conventional three or four lines of therapy. Methods: 82 eligible advanced GIST patients, previously treated with imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib, were collected in the present analysis from 6 cancer centres. All patients received all three standard kinase inhibitors. Imatinib dose increase as active second line or 800 mg upfront in exon 9 mutant GIST were allowed. Specific mutations were recorded if available (deletion versus others) and correlated with survival and response according to RECIST 1.1 or CHOI criteria. Results: Seventy-four of 82 patients received Imatinib 400 mg as rechallenge, while 8 patients were treated with sunitinib at personalised dose and schedule according to the physician’s choice. Mutational status was available in all patients and in 68 patients details about type of mutation were achievable. The median follow-up was 13 months (range 1-42 months). The median time to progression (TTP) in patients receiving a rechallenge therapy was 5.4 months (95% CI 1.9-13.5) and Overall Survival (OS) was 10.6 months (95% CI 2.8-26.9). Apparently, in this setting a correlation between mutational status and response rate, TTP or OS was not found. On the contrary, considering only exon 11 mutated patients and comparing patients with deletion vs non deleted ones a significant difference was identified both in terms of TTP and OS (respectively, P = 0.04 and P = 0.02). Conclusions: Our retrospective data confirm that the rechallenge of imatinib or sunitinib is a reasonable option in advanced GIST patients after failure of previous treatments. As expected, imatinib is the most frequently prescribed option in the Italian real-life setting, demonstrating a TTP and OS longer than those observed in previous studies. Also the prognostic value of the specific type of exon 11 KIT mutations has been confirmed in our series.

Purpose: hERG1 channels are aberrantly expressed in several types of human cancers, where they affect different aspects of cancer cell behavior. A thorough analysis of the functional role and clinical significance of hERG1 channels in gastric cancer is still lacking. Experimental Design: hERG1 expression was tested in a wide (508 samples) Italian cohort of surgically resected patients with gastric cancer, by immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR. The functional link between hERG1 and the VEGF-A was studied in different gastric cancer cell lines. The effects of hERG1 and VEGF-A inhibition were evaluated in vivo in xenograft mouse models. Results: hERG1 was positive in 69% of the patients and positivity correlated with Lauren's intestinal type, fundus localization of the tumor, G1–G2 grading, I and II tumor—node—metastasis stage, and VEGF-A expression. hERG1 activity modulated VEGF-A secretion, through an AKT-dependent regulation of the transcriptional activity of the hypoxia inducible factor. Treatment of immunodeficient mice xenografted with human gastric cancer cells, with a combination of hERG1 blockers and anti-VEGF-A antibodies, impaired tumor growth more than single-drug treatments. Conclusion: Our results show that hERG1 (i) is aberrantly expressed in human gastric cancer since its early stages; (ii) drives an intracellular pathway leading to VEGF-A secretion; (iii) can be exploited to identify a gastric cancer patients' group where a combined treatment with antiangiogenic drugs and noncardiotoxic hERG1 inhibitors could be proposed. Clin Cancer Res; 20(6); 1502–12. ©2014 AACR.

The objective of this trial was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin, methotrexate, and platinum in patients with advanced measurable disease. Thirty-five patients with histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with methotrexate (100 mg/m2 in 500 ml 5% dextrose in a 2-hour infusion, day 1), 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day, i.v. in continuous infusion from days 2 to 5) plus 1-leucovorin (7.5 mg/m2 given per os every 6 hours, from days 2 to 5) and platinum (60 mg/m2 i.v., day 2), every 28 days. Four partial responses (12%; exact 95% confidence interval: 1-23%) were obtained in 34 evaluable patients with a median survival time of 49 weeks (range, 20-77 weeks). Ten (29%) of 34 patients had stable disease. Median time to treatment failure from the beginning of therapy was 11 weeks (range, 4-59 weeks) and median survival time was 20 weeks (range, 4-77 weeks). The most common grade III-IV toxicities were diarrhea (15%), stomatitis (41%), and vomiting (17%). Hematologic toxicity was mild. There were no therapy-related deaths. In conclusion, this trial did not report an increase or improvement in response rate and survival rates, and this regimen cannot be recommended as effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is the cause of 3-4% of cancer related deaths in Italy and over 80% of all patients exhibit advanced disease. Treatment with surgery and chemio-radio-therapy may have meaningful results in resectable and locoregional tumours respectively. Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in metastatic disease as palliative intent, although pancreatic tumour is considered resistant to treatment with conventional cytotoxicity drugs. Assessment of response of primary tumor is extremely difficult because of its anatomical location and fibrotic reaction around the tumor. Furthermore, medical problems associated with the age of patients, reduced performance status (PS), malnourished conditions, jaundice and pain, limit patients’ tolerance and response to chemotherapy. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most frequently used drug in the treatment of pancreatic cancer with a RR of 28% in the trials performed in mid 1980, while more recently studies have reported a RR of 5-15%. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU by leucovorin, PALA and interferon does not appear to produce better results than 5-FU alone. 5-FU-based combination chemotherapy (FAM, SMF, etc) have shown interesting results in phase II (30-40%), but in a randomized trial the results of combination were similar to 5-FU alone ( When chemotherapy was compared to best supportive care (BSC), the results demonstrated a survival gain. Six studies, comparing chemotherapy versus BSC and 3 trials showed statistically significant difference in survival for patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, new drugs have been introduced in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumour (gemcitabine, CPT11, raltitrexed, tax-anes, etc.). Gemcitabine is a novel nucleoside analogue that has shown a very favourable toxicity profile and RR of 10-15% in advanced pancreatic cancer. Data from a phase II and randomized comparative trials suggest that gemcitabine offers an advantage over 5-FU in terms of improvement of PS and general clinical symptoms. Given the difficulty of accurate tumor measurement in this disease, some authors introduced a novel new end-point to evaluate the response: clinical benefit (CB). In a randomized trial of gemcitabine vs 5-FU, RR using CB was 23.8 with gemcitabine and 4.8 with 5-FU, this difference was statistically significant with a median survival of 5.6 and 4.4 months, respectively. In conclusion, future studies should focus on phase III trials with gemcitabine, alone or in combination and phase II with new promising drugs. Quality of life, pharmaco-economic studies, CB should be the principal end-point of these studies. All patients with advanced pancreatic cancer should be included in clinical cooperative trials.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms, with an estimated incidence of 14.2 cases/million/year in northen Italy [1]. However, they are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract

In the recent X-ACT (Xeloda in Adjuvant Colon cancer Therapy) trial, oral capecitabine (Xeloda) demonstrated superior efficacy and an improved safety profile compared with infused fluorouracil + leucovorin (folinic acid) [FU+LV] in patients with Dukes' C colorectal cancer. We used the X-ACT results to determine the cost effectiveness of capecitabine compared with FU+LV from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS).Medical resource use data were collected throughout the treatment period. Unit costs for drug administration, hospitalization, emergency room visits and concomitant medications were obtained using Italian published sources. A health-state transition model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life-month (QALM) gains in the intent-to-treat population (1004 and 983 patients in the capecitabine and FU+LV arms, respectively). Costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3.5%. Costs were calculated in euros (2005 values).Administration of capecitabine required fewer clinic visits per patient than FU+LV (7.35 vs 28.0, respectively). Mean acquisition costs per patient for capecitabine were higher than for FU+LV (euro 2533 vs euro 231, respectively), but this difference was offset by the difference in mean chemotherapy administration costs per patient for FU+LV (euro 4338, compared with euro 152 for capecitabine). Mean total hospital days and medication costs for treatment-related adverse events were higher for FU+LV than for capecitabine (euro 352 vs euro 78, respectively). The cost of emergency room visits for the treatment of adverse events did not differ between the treatment groups. With respect to the lifetime horizon, compared with FU+LV, capecitabine is projected to increase QALMs by a mean 6.5 months, with overall cost savings of euro 2234 over the treatment period. These findings show that capecitabine is an economically dominant treatment in this setting.Adjuvant capecitabine for patients with Dukes' C colon cancer has the same activity in terms of outcome when compared with FU+LV but is a lower cost option from the economic perspective of the Italian NHS.

Background: Paclitaxel and capecitabine have demonstrated a synergic effect and significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer. A weekly schedule of paclitaxel obtained a response rate of 50–68% in advanced breast cancer and less serious side-effects. Patients and methods: Thirty-two patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with chemotherapy were enrolled in a dose-finding trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of paclitaxel given on days 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle combined with capecitabine given twice daily from day 1 through day 14, every 21 days. Three patients were recruited at one of six dose levels (paclitaxel 70–100 mg/m2, capecitabine 1650–2500 mg/m2). Results: Thirty-two patients were accrued and 31 were evaluated for toxicity. One DLT has been experienced at level VI as diarrhea grade 3. We determined dose level V as the MTD, but we recommend dose level IV for phase II studies (capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously weekly), owing to cumulative toxicity at level V. The objective response rate was 43%. Conclusions: Weekly paclitaxel plus capecitabine is a safety and active chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

Background To determine whether the addition of leucovorin to the combination 5-fluorouracil plus levamisole prolongs disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with radically resected colon cancer (Dukes’ B2–3 and C). Patients and methods Patients (1703) were accrued between March 1992 and February 1995 in a large-scale clinical trial within five Italian cooperative groups. After stratification for center, patients were randomized as follows: arm A, 5-fluorouracil [450 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) bolus on days 1–5] and levamisole (150 mg orally for 3 days, every 14 days for 6 months) versus arm B, 6-S-leucovorin (100 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on days 1–5) followed by 5-fluorouracil (370 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on days 1–5), plus levamisole (as arm A), every4 weeks for six cycles. Results After a median follow-up of 6.4 years no significant difference was seen for either disease-free survival (58% versus 60%, not significant) or 5-year overall survival (68% versus 71%, not significant), respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity (World Health Organization grade 3/4) was more frequent in arm B (8% versus 18%, not significant). Conclusions In this trial the schedules used showed no statistically significant differences in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Objective: The objectives of this phase I/II study were to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and activity of cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine (PEG) in the treatment of previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and Methods: Chemonaive patients received fixed doses of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (70 mg/m 2 on day 2) and escalating doses of etoposide (starting dose of 50 mg/m 2 on days 3, 4, and 5) every 3 weeks. No prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used. Results: From September 1998 to April 2000, 56 patients with limited- or extensive-stage SCLC were enrolled and received a total of 235 cycles. Two different etoposide doses were tested in eight patients. At the second level (75 mg/m 2 ), two out of two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) and no further dose-escalation was attempted, thus an etoposide dose of 50 mg/m 2 was defined as the MTD. In the subsequent phase II evaluation, 48 additional patients were enrolled, for a total of 54 patients treated at the MTD. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 66.7 and 53.7% of patients, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild, with grade 3 diarrhea and fatigue as the main side effects. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis (one at 75 mg/m 2 and the other at 50 mg/m 2 etoposide). Ten complete and 29 partial responses were reported, for an overall response rate of 72.2% (95% confidence interval, 56.6–85.0%). The median duration of response and median survival were 8.0 and 10 months, respectively, with a 1-year survival probability of 37.5%. Conclusions: The combination of PEG is feasible and well tolerated as front-line chemotherapy in SCLC. A randomized comparison of this triplet is underway.

Summary Purpose Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anti-cancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). The aim of this dose-finding trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the activity of the combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients and methods Twenty-five chemotherapy-pretreated patients received the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Capecitabine was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days in doses ranging from 1650 to 2500 mg/m2/d, and oxaliplatin was administered as a two-hour infusion on day 1 using dose, ranges from 100 to 130 mg/m2 repeated every three weeks. Results Twenty-five patients were assessable for toxicity, and DLTs were diarrhea (grade ≥ 3: 270025) and stomatitis (grade ≥3: 90025) at dose level VI. Dose level V (capecitabine 2500 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2) was found to be the MTD. Hematological toxicity was minimal, overall neuro-toxicity (grade 1–4) was 270025 with 10025 grade 3–4. A global response rate was 170025 (950025 confidence interval (950025 Cl): 20025–320025) and the median overall survival was 12 months. Conclusion The recommended dose for further phase II studies is capecitabine 2500 mg/m2/d with intermittent schedule and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2 every three weeks. The toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal: diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting. This combination should be studied in phase II trials in advanced colorectal.

In a multicenter phase II Italian trial that used a 28-day dosing schedule of gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin on day 2, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the main dose-limiting toxicities observed. The aim of the present study was to determine whether using 15-day cisplatin in lieu of the standard 2-day schedule in combination with weekly gemcitabine would decrease expected myelotoxicities, particularly thrombocytopenia. Fifty-one patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a median age of 62 years (range 31–76) and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scores of 0–1, were enrolled. Twenty-four patients had stage IIIA-B disease and 27 had stage IV. Patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 on day-15, every 28 days for a total of 151 cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 16% of patients, grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 35% of patients, and grade 3 anemia in 4% of patients (no grade 4 anemia). Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Two patients had grade 3 vomiting, and another had grade 4 hepatic toxicity only after gemcitabine administration. The dose intensity of gemcitabine and cisplatin was well maintained. Of the 45 patients evaluable for response, there were 22 (49%) partial responders, 7 (15.5%) minimal responders, 9 (20%) with stable disease, and 7 (15.5%) progressions. Compared with the schedule used in a multicenter phase II Italian trial (day 2 cisplatin), day-15 cisplatin decreases incidences of thrombocytopenia (16 vs. 52%) and anemia (4 vs. 25%); the occurrence of neutropenia is similar (35 vs. 36%). Response rates are also similar (49 vs. 54%).

Aim This phase II trial evaluated the biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) with or without ifosfamide (IFO) in chemotherapy-naive patients with colorectal cancer. Patients and methods Forty-eight patients were randomized to receive: FA (25 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), arm A; or FA (25 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3), followed by 5-FU (750 mg/m2 iv bolus days 1 to 3) plus IFO (2,000 mg/m2 in 1000 mL 5% dextrose in a 2-hr infusion, days 1 to 3), arm B. Mesna was added during and after IFO to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis. Treatment was repeated every 21 days in both arms. Results Forty-five patients were assessable for response: in arm A, 5 patients achieved a partial response (overall response, 25%), and in arm B, 2 patients achieved a complete and 1 a partial response (overall response, 12%). Time to failure was 3.5 months (range, 1–38) in patients treated with 5-FU plus FA, and 3 months (range, 1–21) in patients treated with the IFO combination. The median survival time was 13.5 months (range, 1–49 months) in arm A and 16 months (range, 1–43 months) in arm B. Diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting were the most common nonhematologic toxicities in both arms. The most notable hematologic toxicity was leukopenia; 15% and 20% of patients experienced grade 4 in arm A and arm B, respectively. Conclusions IFO does not increase the activity of the 5-FU plus FA combination in advanced colorectal cancer.

Capecitabine (Xeloda)® was developed as a tumour-selective fluoropyrimidine carbamate to achieve higher intratumoural 5-FU level and lower toxicity than 5-FU. Capecitabine passes unchanged through the gastrointestinal tract and is metabolised in the liver to 5′-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5′-DFCR). Here it is converted to doxifluridine (5′-DFUR) and finally, 5′-DFUR is metabolised by thymidine phosphorilase to 5-FU at the tumour site. Preclinical studies have demonstrated capecitabine’s activity in both 5-FU-sensitive and 5-FU-resistant tumours. In a randomised phase II trial in advanced colorectal cancer the recommended dose and schedule of Capecitabine is 2.510 mg/m2/day (total dose divided into two equal morning and evening doses) given in an intermittent schedule (2 weeks on/1 week off). Phase III trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer show a better response rate than the Mayo Clinic schedule, with no differences in terms of DR, PFS. Diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome were the principal grade 3/4 toxicities noted, occurring in 10% and 16% of patients, respectively. The selectivity of this drug opens an important prospective in the treatment of colorectal cancer in advanced and adjuvant setting.

Paclitaxel and mitoxantrone are highly active agents in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study evaluated the combination of paclitaxel and mitoxantrone in patients with advanced breast cancer to determine activity and toxicity.42 patients with ABC were treated with paclitaxel at a fixed dose of 175 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) by a 3-hour infusion on day 1, while mitoxantrone was given by 2 mg/m2 increments, starting from 10 mg/m2 by bolus IV injection on day 1 after paclitaxel. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Mitoxantrone doses were increased if the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) had not been reached.The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 69% (CI 95%: 55-83). Six (14%) patients obtained CR and 23 (55%) PR with a median duration of response of 8 months (range 2-16). There were no differences in response rates (RR) between the three levels of mitoxantrone. Median time to failure and survival were 7 months (range 1-26) and 12 months (range 2-29), respectively. After 12 months 14 (33%) patients had died and 8 (19%) patients were alive after 18 months. MTD was reached at 14 mg/m2 level of mitoxantrone. Leukopenia was evident in 39 (93%) of total patients and was severe in 28 (67%) patients. All non-hematological toxicity observed was mild.This trial shows the activity of paclitaxel and mitoxantrone in ABC and finds that a dose of 14 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone is the MTD in combination with a fixed dose of 175 mg/m2 of paclitaxel without granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF).

Patients with histologically confirmed advanced colorectal cancer were randomized to receive folinic acid (FA; 500 mg/mq in 2-hour intravenous infusion) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU; 600 mg/mq given as an intravenous bolus 1 hour after FA), beginning every week for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period, either without hydroxyurea (HU, arm A) or with HU (35 mg/kg per day) given orally in three administrations (every 8 hours) starting 6 hours after 5FU administration (arm B). Six weekly doses were considered one course. One hundred eighty-two patients were randomized in this trial and 162 (89%) were evaluable for response: 81 patients in arm A and 81 patients in arm B. Objective response was observed in 18 (one complete response and 17 partial responses) of 81 evaluable patients (22%; 95% confidence interval, 13-31%) in arm A, and 24 (nine complete responses and 15 partial responses) of 81 patients (30%; 95% confidence interval, 20-40%) in arm B. There was no difference in terms of median time to progression and median survival. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the most frequently observed toxicity in both arms. The double modulation of 5FU, FA plus HU does not appear to be better than the classic 5FU plus FA schedule. This trial confirms that 5FU and FA reached a plateau of 20% to 30%.

Francesco Di Costanzo,1 Silvia Gasperoni,1 Virginia Rotella,1 Federica Di Costanzo21Struttura Complessa Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence; 2Servizio di Oncologia: Ospedale S: Maria della Stella, Orvieto, ItalyAbstract: Taxanes are chemotherapeutic agents with a large spectrum of antitumor activity when used as monotherapy or in combination regimens. Paclitaxel and docetaxel have poor solubility and require a complex solvent system for their commercial formulation, Cremophor EL® (CrEL) and Tween 80® respectively. Both these biological surfactants have recently been implicated as contributing not only to the hypersensitivity reactions, but also to the degree of peripheral neurotoxicity and myelosuppression, and may antagonize the cytotoxicity. Nab-paclitaxel, or nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007; Abraxane®), is a novel formulation of paclitaxel that does not employ the CrEL solvent system. Nab-paclitaxel demonstrates greater efficacy and a favorable safety profile compared with standard paclitaxel in patients with advanced disease (breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, ovarian cancer). Clinical studies in breast cancer have shown that nab-paclitaxel is significantly more effective than standard paclitaxel in terms of overall objective response rate (ORR) and time to progression. Nab-paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine, capecitabine or bevacizumab has been shown to be very active in patients with advanced breast cancer. An economic analysis showed that nab-paclitaxel would be an economically reasonable alternative to docetaxel or standard paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. Favorable tumor ORR and manageable toxicities have been reported for nab-paclitaxel as monotherapy or in combination treatment in advanced breast cancer.Keywords: breast cancer, nab-paclitaxel, chemotherapy

Background The detection of circulating tumour cells (CTC) in blood sample in patients with early or advanced colorectal cancer has a potential prognostic value. Methods The challenge of CTC detection is related to the requirement of high sensitivity combined with high specificity method. CTCs detection can be distinguished between indirect and direct methods. The former ones are based on the recognition of tissue-, organ- or tumour-specific markers by immuno-histochemistry (indirect immuno-mediated methods) or (real-time) RT-PCR (indirect molecular methods), whilst the latter are related to CTCs selection based on the physical properties of density and sizes. Ongoing and future isolation by size of epithelial tumour cells (ISET) developments concerning automated image analysis on the filter and transmission of high definition images through the web for ‘on line’ cytopathological consultations are aimed to speed up the work of cytopathologists on CTC/ circulating tumour microemboli (CTM) detection. Conclusions CTC detection in colorectal cancer (CRC) correlates with pathological stage and clinical outcome in particular in those patients with advanced disease. CRC CTC level before and after CT are an independent prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival. The positive prognostic value of complete clearance CTC after surgery may be useful to select patients for adjuvant chemotherapy.