Search

Background Previous research shows that a lung ultrasound score (LUS) can anticipate CPAP failure in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Research Question Can LUS also predict the need for surfactant replacement? Study Design and Methods Multicenter, pragmatic study of preterm neonates who underwent lung ultrasound at birth and those given surfactant by masked physicians, who also were scanned within 24 h from administration. Clinical data and respiratory support variables were recorded. Accuracy of LUS, oxygen saturation to F io 2 ratio, F io 2, and Silverman score for surfactant administration were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The simultaneous prognostic values of LUS and oxygen saturation to F io 2 ratio for surfactant administration, adjusting for gestational age (GA), were analyzed through a logistic regression model. Results Two hundred forty infants were enrolled. One hundred eight received at least one dose of surfactant. LUS predicted the first surfactant administration with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91), cut off of 9, sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86), specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), positive predictive value of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87), negative predictive value of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.89), positive likelihood ratio of 4.65 (95% CI, 3.14-6.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.18-0.37). No significant difference was shown among different GA groups: 25 to 27 weeks’ GA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99), 28 to 30 weeks’ GA (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.91), and 31 to 33 weeks’ GA (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95), respectively. LUS declined significantly within 24 h in infants receiving one surfactant dose. When comparing F io 2, oxygen saturation to F io 2 ratio, LUS, and Silverman scores as criteria for surfactant administration, only the latter showed a significantly poorer performance. The combination of oxygen saturation to F io 2 ratio and LUS showed the highest predictive power, with an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97), regardless of the GA interval. Interpretation LUS is a reliable criterion to administer the first surfactant dose regardless of GA. Its association with oxygen saturation to F io 2 ratio significantly improves the prediction power for surfactant need.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The utility of a lung ultrasound score (LUS) has been described in the early phases of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). We investigated lung ultrasound as a tool to monitor respiratory status in preterm neonates throughout the course of RDS. METHODS: Preterm neonates, stratified in 3 gestational age cohorts (25–27, 28–30, and 31–33 weeks), underwent lung ultrasound at weekly intervals from birth. Clinical data, respiratory support variables, and major complications (sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus, pneumothorax, and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate) were also recorded. RESULTS: We enrolled 240 infants in total. The 3 gestational age intervals had significantly different LUS patterns. There was a significant correlation between LUS and the ratio of oxygen saturation to inspired oxygen throughout the admission, increasing with gestational age (b = −0.002 [P < .001] at 25–27 weeks; b = −0.006 [P < .001] at 28–30 weeks; b = −0.012 [P < .001] at 31–33 weeks). Infants with complications had a higher LUS already at birth (12 interquartile range 13–8 vs 8 interquartile range 12–4 control group; P = .001). In infants 25 to 30 weeks’ gestation, the LUS at 7 days of life predicted bronchopulmonary dysplasia with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 93). CONCLUSIONS: In preterm neonates affected by RDS, the LUS trajectory is gestational age dependent, significantly correlates with the oxygenation status, and predicts bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In this population, LUS is a useful, bedside, noninvasive tool to monitor the respiratory status.

Previous research shows that a lung ultrasound score (LUS) can anticipate CPAP failure in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Can LUS also predict the need for surfactant replacement?Multicenter, pragmatic study of preterm neonates who underwent lung ultrasound at birth and those given surfactant by masked physicians, who also were scanned within 24 h from administration. Clinical data and respiratory support variables were recorded. Accuracy of LUS, oxygen saturation to FioTwo hundred forty infants were enrolled. One hundred eight received at least one dose of surfactant. LUS predicted the first surfactant administration with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91), cut off of 9, sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86), specificity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), positive predictive value of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.71-0.87), negative predictive value of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.89), positive likelihood ratio of 4.65 (95% CI, 3.14-6.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (95% CI, 0.18-0.37). No significant difference was shown among different GA groups: 25 to 27 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99), 28 to 30 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.91), and 31 to 33 weeks' GA (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95), respectively. LUS declined significantly within 24 h in infants receiving one surfactant dose. When comparing FioLUS is a reliable criterion to administer the first surfactant dose regardless of GA. Its association with oxygen saturation to Fio

Neonatal hypothermia is an important challenge associated with morbidity and mortality. Preventing neonatal hypothermia is important in high-resource countries, but is of fundamental importance in low-resource settings where supportive care is limited. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is a low-cost intervention that, whenever possible, is strongly recommended for temperature maintenance. During KMC, the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend the use of a cap/hat, but its effect on temperature control during KMC remains to be established. In the hospitals participating in the projects of the non-governmental organization CUAMM, KMC represents a standard of care, but the heads of the babies often remain uncovered due to local habits or to the unavailability of a cap. The aim of the present study will be to assess the effectiveness and safety of using a woolen cap in maintaining normothermia in low-birth-weight infants (LBWI) during KMC. This is a multicenter (three hospitals), multicountry (three countries), prospective, unblinded, randomized controlled trial of KMC treatment with and without a woolen cap in LBWI. After obtaining parental consent, all infants with a birth weight below 2500 g and who are candidates for KMC, based on the clinical decision of the attending physician, will be assigned to the KMC with a woolen cap group or to the KMC without a woolen cap group in a 1:1 ratio according to a computer-generated, randomized sequence. The duration of the study will be until the patient’s discharge, with a maximum treatment duration of 7 days. The primary outcome measure will be whether the infants’ temperatures remain within the normal range (36.5–37.5 °C) in the course of KMC during the intervention. In all participants, axillary temperature will be measured with a digital thermometer four times per day. In addition, maternal and room temperature will be recorded. Secondary outcome measures will be: episodes of apnea; sepsis; mortality before hospital discharge; in-hospital growth; and age at discharge. The findings of this study will be important for other units/settings in high- as well low-resource countries where KMC is routinely performed. Based on the results of the present study, we could speculate whether the use of a woolen cap may help to maintain the neonate within the normal thermal range. Furthermore, potential complications such as hyperthermia will be strictly monitored and collected. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02645526 (registered on 31 December 2015).