Search

Introduction: Visual disturbances are the most common symptoms of migraine aura. These symptoms can be described systematically by subdividing them into elementary visual symptoms. Since visual symptoms of migraine aura are not easy to describe verbally, we developed a collection of images illustrating previously reported elementary visual symptoms., Objectives: To test a standardised visual migraine aura iconography in a large population of migraine with aura patients and to improve it based on the participants' feedback., Methods: We created a set of images representing 25 elementary visual symptoms and a web-based survey where participants could report whether they recognised these images as part of their visual aura. Elementary visual symptoms could also be recognised via a corresponding text description or described in a free text by participants. Individuals with migraine aura recruited from four tertiary headache centres (in Switzerland, Denmark, Norway and Italy) were invited to complete the survey., Results: Two hundred and fifteen participants completed the study (78.9% women, median age 36). They recognised a total of 1645 elementary visual symptoms from our predefined list. Of those, 1291 (78.4%) where recognised via standardised iconography images. A new type of elementary visual symptom was reported by one participant., Conclusion: Most elementary visual symptoms experienced by participants were recognised via the standardised iconography. This tool can be useful for clinical as well as research purposes., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.H. has received honoraria for lecturing and/or writing from Allergan, Novartis, Teva, Lundbeck, and Eli Lilly. He serves as Associate Editor of Headache. A.A. and A.P. received compensation for speaking activities and consulting fees from Novartis, Teva Pharma, Eli-Lilly.E.T. has received personal fees for lectures/advisory boards: Novartis, Eli Lilly, Abbvie, TEVA, Roche, Lundbeck, Pfizer, Biogen. Consultant for and owner of stocks and IP in Man & Science. Stocks and IP in Nordic Brain Tech. Non-personal research grants from several sources, including EU, Norwegian Research Council, Dam foundation, KlinBeForsk. Commissioned research (non-personal): Lundbeck, Pfizer.Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (employer) received compensation for C.Z.’s speaking activities, consulting fees, or research grants from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Genzyme, Lundbeck, Merck, Novartis, Teva Pharma, Roche.M.V., T.P.D., M.M.K., M.F., S.S. I.G.W., C.G. declare no conflict of interest.

Aim: To compare safety and functional outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between females and males with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) in relation to preadmission use of antiplatelets., Methods: Multicentre cohort study of patients admitted from 1 January 2014 to 31 January 2020 to hospitals participating in the Swiss Stroke Registry, presenting with AIS and receiving IVT. Primary safety outcome was in-hospital symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH). Primary functional outcome was functional independence at 3 months after discharge. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to assess the association between sex and each outcome according to preadmission use of antiplatelets., Results: The study included 4996 patients (42.51 % females, older than males, median age 79 vs 71 years, p < 0.0001). Comparable proportions of females (39.92 %) and males (40.39 %) used antiplatelets before admission (p = 0.74). In total, 3.06 % females and 2.47 % males developed in-hospital sICH (p = 0.19), with similar odds (adjusted odds ratio, [AOR] 0.93, 95 % confidence interval, [CI] 0.63-1.39). No interaction was found between sex and preadmission use of either single or dual antiplatelets in relation to in-hospital sICH (p = 0.94 and p = 0.23). Males had higher odds of functional independence at 3 months (AOR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.09-1.65), regardless of preadmission use of antiplatelets (interaction between sex and preadmission use of either single or dual antiplatelets p = 0.41 and p = 0.58)., Conclusion: No sex differences were observed in the safety of IVT regarding preadmission use of antiplatelets. Males showed more favourable 3-month functional independence than females; however, this sex difference was apparently not explained by a sex-specific mechanism related to preadmission use of antiplatelets., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Erenumab (ERE) is the first anticalcitonin gene-related peptide receptor monoclonal antibody approved for migraine prevention. A proportion of patients do not adequately respond to ERE., Methods: Prospective multicenter study involving 110 migraine patients starting ERE 70 mg monthly. Baseline socio-demographics and migraine characteristics, including mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), migraine-related burden (MIDAS [Migraine Disability Assessment scale] and Headache Impact Test-6), and use of abortive medications, during 3 months before and after ERE start were collected. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to determine polymorphic variants of calcitonin receptor-like receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein-1 genes. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors for 50% responder patients (50-RESP) and 75% responder patients (75-RESP)., Results: At month 3, MMDs decreased from 17.2 to 9.2 (p < 0.0001), 59/110 (53.6%) patients were 50-RESP, and 30/110 (27.3%) were 75-RESP. Age at migraine onset (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (95% CI)]: 1.062 [1.008-1.120], p = 0.024), number of failed preventive medications (0.753 [0.600-0.946], p = 0.015), and MIDAS score (1.011 [1.002-1.020], p = 0.017) were associated with 75-RESP. Among the genetic variants investigated, RAMP1 rs7590387 was found associated with a lower probability of being 75-RESP (per G allele OR [95% CI]: 0.53 [0.29-0.99], p = 0.048]), but this association did not survive adjustment for confounding clinical variables (per G allele, 0.55 [0.28-1.10], p = 0.09])., Conclusions: In this real-word study, treatment with ERE significantly reduced MMDs. The number of failed preventive medications, migraine burden, and age at migraine onset predicted response to ERE. Larger studies are required to confirm a possible role of RAMP1 rs7590387 as genetic predictor of ERE efficacy., (© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)