Search

Your search keyword '"Sierevelt, Inger N."' showing total 615 results
Start Over Author "Sierevelt, Inger N."
615 results on '"Sierevelt, Inger N."'

11. A modified Delphi study to identify which items should be evaluated in shoulder instability research: a first step in developing a core outcome set

Author

van den Borne, M., van der Linde, J.A., van Deurzen, D.F.P., van der Meijden, O.A.J., Alta, T.D.W., Muller, B., Floor, S., Wessel, R.N., van Noort, A., Kooistra, B.W., Gosens, T., Kleinlugtenbelt, Y.V., Berendes, T.D., van der Veen, H.C., Visser, C., van den Brand, C.L., Wildevuur-Houthoff, A.M.L., Wei, A., Verbeek, R., Barten, D.G., Verdonschot, R.J.C.G., Boeije, T., Roodheuvel, F., Huis in ’t Veld, M.A., Röttger, E., Versteegen, M., Douma, D., Azijli – Abdellaoui, K., Walraven, L., Boden, R., Sluijter, N., van Gastel, M.L., van den Berg, W., Jansen-Oskam, P., Haas, I.S., Nes, H., Koel, G., Hessel, B., Heijblok, D., Husen, I.M., Numan, M., Boon, F., Verweij, Lukas P.E., Sierevelt, Inger N., Baden, David N., Derksen, Robert Jan, van der Woude, Henk-Jan, Hekman, Karin M.C., and van den Bekerom, Michel P.J.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. The Modified Tampa-Scale of Kinesiophobia for Anterior Shoulder Instability

Author

den Arend, M.C., Boon, F., Versluis, E.J., van Noort, A.V.N., Alta, T.D., Portegies, S., Haas, I.S., Schmitz, P.M., de Fockert, L.H., Raven, E.E.J., Tijhaar, L.M., Nordkamp, R.A.G., Berendes, T.D., Veen, B.J.V., Govaert, L.H.M., den Butter, J.E., van der Burg, D.H., Gosens, T., van den Broek, C.M., Bastiaenssens, J.B., Janssens, R.L.M., van Heusden, B., Martijn, A.M., Kok, L.M., Engelsma, Y., van Iersel, Theodore P., Larsen van Gastel, Marianne, Versantvoort, Astrid, Hekman, Karin M.C., Sierevelt, Inger N., Broekman, Birit F.P., and van den Bekerom, Michel P.J.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Lower leg symmetry: a Q3D-CT analysis

Author

Vuurberg, Gwendolyn, Dahmen, Jari, Dobbe, Iwan G. G., Kleipool, Roeland P., Hayat, Batur, Sierevelt, Inger N., Streekstra, Geert, Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J., and Stufkens, Sjoerd A. S.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. The minimal important change is not a universal fixed value across diagnoses when using the FAOS and FAAM in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery.

Author

Sierevelt, Inger N., van Kampen, Paulien M., Terwee, Caroline B., Nolte, Peter A., Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J., and Haverkamp, Daniel

Subjects
*RECEIVER operating characteristic curves, *ANKLE, *RESEARCH personnel, *PREDICTION models
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to calculate region and diagnosis‐specific minimal important changes (MICs) of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in patients requiring foot and ankle surgery and to assess their variability across different foot and ankle diagnoses. Methods: The study used routinely collected data from patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. Patients had been invited to complete the FAOS and FAAM preoperatively and at 3–6 months after surgery, along with two anchor questions encompassing change in pain and daily function. Patients were categorised according to region of pathology and subsequent diagnoses. MICs were calculated using predictive modelling (MICPRED) and receiver operating characteristic curve (MICROC) method and evaluated according to strict credibility criteria. Results: Substantial variability of the MICs between forefoot and ankle/hindfoot region was observed, as well as among specific foot and ankle diagnoses, with MICPRED and MICROC values ranging from 7.8 to 25.5 points and 9.4 to 27.8, respectively. Despite differences between MICROC and MICPRED estimates, both calculation methods exhibited largely consistent patterns of variation across subgroups, with forefoot conditions systematically showing smaller MICs than ankle/hindfoot conditions. Most MICs demonstrated high credibility; however, the majority of the MICs for the FAOS symptoms subscale and forefoot conditions exhibited insufficient or low credibility. Conclusion: The MICs of the FAOS and FAAM vary across foot and ankle diagnoses in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery and should not be used as a universal fixed value, but recognised as contextual parameters. This can help clinicians and researchers in more accurate interpretation of the FAOS and FAAM change scores. Level of Evidence: Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. What Surgical Technique to Perform for Isolated Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy After Distal Radius Malunion: A Systematic Review.

Author

Laane, Charlotte L. E., Oude Nijhuis, Koen D., Spil, Jonne, Sierevelt, Inger N., Doornberg, Job N., Jaarsma, Ruurd L., Verhofstad, Michael H. J., and Wijffels, Mathieu M. E.

Abstract

Background: Unstable fractures of the distal radius fractures (DRFs) may result in malunion, usually consisting of subsequent shortening and angular deviations. Ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is assumed to be a simpler procedure than radial correction osteotomy, resulting in fewer complications and comparable outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the best surgical technique to perform USO to restore distal radioulnar joint congruency after DRF malunion. Methods: A systematic review of the literature is performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines in February 2022 to identify studies reporting outcomes and surgical technique for isolated USO. The primary outcome was complication rates. Secondary outcomes included functional, radiologic, and patient-rated outcomes. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies criteria were used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Included were 12 cohorts (185 participants). Due to substantial heterogeneity, a meta-analysis could not be performed. The overall complication rate was 33% (95% confidence interval, 16% to 51%). The most reported complication was implant irritation (22%), often requiring removal of the implant (13%). Only 3% nonunions were mentioned. Functional and patient-rated outcomes improved in most patients after USO. Quality of evidence of the papers was low to very low. Common methodological flaws were related to retrospective research. Conclusion: No evident differences in complication rates and functional outcomes between the surgical techniques were observed. Based on this literature, most complications are related to implant irritation. Nonunion and infection rates were rare. Therefore, a surgical technique with a buried implant might be preferred. This hypothesis requires further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

43. Regarding “Concomitant Subchondral Bone Cysts Negatively Affect Clinical Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus”: Going Beyond the Surface

Author

Dahmen, Jari, primary, Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S., additional, Kuijer, P. Paul F.M., additional, Kerkhoffs, Gino M.M.J., additional, Broos, Sebastiaan, additional, Blankevoort, Leendert, additional, Emanuel, Kaj S., additional, Gouttebarge, Vincent, additional, Hollander, Julian J., additional, Piech, Maciej, additional, Ramsodit, Kishan R., additional, Rikken, Quinten G.H., additional, Sierevelt, Inger N., additional, Struijs, Peter A.A., additional, and Walinga, Alex B., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

50. Quality of patient- and proxy-reported outcomes for children with impairment of the lower extremity: A systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology.

Author

Saris, Tim FF, Kalle, JP Ruben, Sierevelt, Inger N, Eygendaal, Denise, and van Bergen, Christiaan JA

Subjects
PATIENT reported outcome measures, PEDIATRIC orthopedics, EVIDENCE-based medicine
Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures have become crucial in the clinical evaluation of patients. Appropriate selection, in a young population, of the instrument is vital to providing evidence-based patient-centered healthcare. This systematic review applies the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology to provide a critically appraised overview of patient-reported outcome measures targeted at pediatric orthopedic patients with lower limb impairment. Method: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed to identify original studies reporting the development and/or validation of patient-reported outcome measures evaluating children with impairment of the lower extremity. Data extraction, quality assessment, and risk of bias evaluation were performed following the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Results: A total of 6919 articles were screened. Thirty-three studies were included, reporting evidence on the measurement properties of 13 different patient-reported outcome measures and 20 translations. Four studies reported on content validity and patient-reported outcome measure development. The methodological quality of studies on structural validity, content validity, or patient-reported outcome measure development was mostly rated as "doubtful" or "very good." The quality of evidence on measurement properties varied noticeably, with most studies needing to perform improve their methodological quality to justify their results. Conclusion: This review provides an extensive overview of all available patient-reported outcome measures for patients with lower extremity impairment within pediatric orthopedics. We cautiously advise the use of four patient-reported outcome measures. However, the scarce availability of research on content validity and patient-reported outcome measure development highlights an area for future research endeavors to improve our knowledge on the currently available patient-reported outcome measures. Level of evidence: Diagnostic level 1 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results