Search

Attenuation compensation (AC), while being beneficial for visual-interpretation tasks in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by SPECT, typically requires the availability of a separate X-ray CT component, leading to additional radiation dose, higher costs, and potentially inaccurate diagnosis due to SPECT/CT misalignment. To address these issues, we developed a method for cardiac SPECT AC using deep learning and emission scatter-window photons without a separate transmission scan (CTLESS). In this method, an estimated attenuation map reconstructed from scatter-energy window projections is segmented into different regions using a multi-channel input multi-decoder network trained on CT scans. Pre-defined attenuation coefficients are assigned to these regions, yielding the attenuation map used for AC. We objectively evaluated this method in a retrospective study with anonymized clinical SPECT/CT stress MPI images on the clinical task of detecting defects with an anthropomorphic model observer. CTLESS yielded statistically non-inferior performance compared to a CT-based AC (CTAC) method and significantly outperformed a non-AC (NAC) method on this clinical task. Similar results were observed in stratified analyses with different sexes, defect extents and severities. The method was observed to generalize across two SPECT scanners, each with a different camera. In addition, CTLESS yielded similar performance as CTAC and outperformed NAC method on the metrics of root mean squared error and structural similarity index measure. Moreover, as we reduced the training dataset size, CTLESS yielded relatively stable AUC values and generally outperformed another DL-based AC method that directly estimated the attenuation coefficient within each voxel. These results demonstrate the capability of the CTLESS method for transmission-less AC in SPECT and motivate further clinical evaluation.

Myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), or myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) is a widely used clinical imaging modality for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Current clinical protocols for acquiring and reconstructing MPS images are similar for most patients. However, for patients with outlier anatomical characteristics, such as large breasts, images acquired using conventional protocols are often sub-optimal in quality, leading to degraded diagnostic accuracy. Solutions to improve image quality for these patients outside of increased dose or total acquisition time remain challenging. Thus, there is an important need for new methodologies to improve image quality for such patients. One approach to improving this performance is adapting the image acquisition protocol specific to each patient. For this study, we first designed and implemented a personalized patient-specific protocol-optimization strategy, which we term precision SPECT (PRESPECT). This strategy integrates ideal observer theory with the constraints of tomographic reconstruction to optimize the acquisition time for each projection view, such that MPS defect detection performance is maximized. We performed a clinically realistic simulation study on patients with outlier anatomies on the task of detecting perfusion defects on various realizations of low-dose scans by an anthropomorphic channelized Hotelling observer. Our results show that using PRESPECT led to improved performance on the defect detection task for the considered patients. These results provide evidence that personalization of MPS acquisition protocol has the potential to improve defect detection performance, motivating further research to design optimal patient-specific acquisition and reconstruction protocols for MPS, as well as developing similar approaches for other medical imaging modalities., Comment: To be published in the Proceedings of SPIE, Medical Imaging 2024

There is an important need for methods to process myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) SPECT images acquired at lower radiation dose and/or acquisition time such that the processed images improve observer performance on the clinical task of detecting perfusion defects. To address this need, we build upon concepts from model-observer theory and our understanding of the human visual system to propose a Detection task-specific deep-learning-based approach for denoising MPI SPECT images (DEMIST). The approach, while performing denoising, is designed to preserve features that influence observer performance on detection tasks. We objectively evaluated DEMIST on the task of detecting perfusion defects using a retrospective study with anonymized clinical data in patients who underwent MPI studies across two scanners (N = 338). The evaluation was performed at low-dose levels of 6.25%, 12.5% and 25% and using an anthropomorphic channelized Hotelling observer. Performance was quantified using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Images denoised with DEMIST yielded significantly higher AUC compared to corresponding low-dose images and images denoised with a commonly used task-agnostic DL-based denoising method. Similar results were observed with stratified analysis based on patient sex and defect type. Additionally, DEMIST improved visual fidelity of the low-dose images as quantified using root mean squared error and structural similarity index metric. A mathematical analysis revealed that DEMIST preserved features that assist in detection tasks while improving the noise properties, resulting in improved observer performance. The results provide strong evidence for further clinical evaluation of DEMIST to denoise low-count images in MPI SPECT.

Artificial intelligence-based methods have generated substantial interest in nuclear medicine. An area of significant interest has been using deep-learning (DL)-based approaches for denoising images acquired with lower doses, shorter acquisition times, or both. Objective evaluation of these approaches is essential for clinical application. DL-based approaches for denoising nuclear-medicine images have typically been evaluated using fidelity-based figures of merit (FoMs) such as RMSE and SSIM. However, these images are acquired for clinical tasks and thus should be evaluated based on their performance in these tasks. Our objectives were to (1) investigate whether evaluation with these FoMs is consistent with objective clinical-task-based evaluation; (2) provide a theoretical analysis for determining the impact of denoising on signal-detection tasks; (3) demonstrate the utility of virtual clinical trials (VCTs) to evaluate DL-based methods. A VCT to evaluate a DL-based method for denoising myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) images was conducted. The impact of DL-based denoising was evaluated using fidelity-based FoMs and AUC, which quantified performance on detecting perfusion defects in MPS images as obtained using a model observer with anthropomorphic channels. Based on fidelity-based FoMs, denoising using the considered DL-based method led to significantly superior performance. However, based on ROC analysis, denoising did not improve, and in fact, often degraded detection-task performance. The results motivate the need for objective task-based evaluation of DL-based denoising approaches. Further, this study shows how VCTs provide a mechanism to conduct such evaluations using VCTs. Finally, our theoretical treatment reveals insights into the reasons for the limited performance of the denoising approach.

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods are showing substantial promise in segmenting oncologic positron emission tomography (PET) images. For clinical translation of these methods, assessing their performance on clinically relevant tasks is important. However, these methods are typically evaluated using metrics that may not correlate with the task performance. One such widely used metric is the Dice score, a figure of merit that measures the spatial overlap between the estimated segmentation and a reference standard (e.g., manual segmentation). In this work, we investigated whether evaluating AI-based segmentation methods using Dice scores yields a similar interpretation as evaluation on the clinical tasks of quantifying metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumor from PET images of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The investigation was conducted via a retrospective analysis with the ECOG-ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 multi-center clinical trial data. Specifically, we evaluated different structures of a commonly used AI-based segmentation method using both Dice scores and the accuracy in quantifying MTV/TLG. Our results show that evaluation using Dice scores can lead to findings that are inconsistent with evaluation using the task-based figure of merit. Thus, our study motivates the need for objective task-based evaluation of AI-based segmentation methods for quantitative PET.

Deep-learning (DL)-based methods have shown significant promise in denoising myocardial perfusion SPECT images acquired at low dose. For clinical application of these methods, evaluation on clinical tasks is crucial. Typically, these methods are designed to minimize some fidelity-based criterion between the predicted denoised image and some reference normal-dose image. However, while promising, studies have shown that these methods may have limited impact on the performance of clinical tasks in SPECT. To address this issue, we use concepts from the literature on model observers and our understanding of the human visual system to propose a DL-based denoising approach designed to preserve observer-related information for detection tasks. The proposed method was objectively evaluated on the task of detecting perfusion defect in myocardial perfusion SPECT images using a retrospective study with anonymized clinical data. Our results demonstrate that the proposed method yields improved performance on this detection task compared to using low-dose images. The results show that by preserving task-specific information, DL may provide a mechanism to improve observer performance in low-dose myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Attenuation compensation (AC) is beneficial for visual interpretation tasks in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). However, traditional AC methods require the availability of a transmission scan, most often a CT scan. This approach has the disadvantages of increased radiation dose, increased scanner cost, and the possibility of inaccurate diagnosis in cases of misregistration between the SPECT and CT images. Further, many SPECT systems do not include a CT component. To address these issues, we developed a Scatter-window projection and deep Learning-based AC (SLAC) method to perform AC without a separate transmission scan. To investigate the clinical efficacy of this method, we then objectively evaluated the performance of this method on the clinical task of detecting perfusion defects on MPI in a retrospective study with anonymized clinical SPECT/CT stress MPI images. The proposed method was compared with CT-based AC (CTAC) and no-AC (NAC) methods. Our results showed that the SLAC method yielded an almost overlapping receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot and a similar area under the ROC (AUC) to the CTAC method on this task. These results demonstrate the capability of the SLAC method for transmission-less AC in SPECT and motivate further clinical evaluation.

Objective evaluation of quantitative imaging (QI) methods with patient data is highly desirable, but is hindered by the lack or unreliability of an available gold standard. To address this issue, techniques that can evaluate QI methods without access to a gold standard are being actively developed. These techniques assume that the true and measured values are linearly related by a slope, bias, and Gaussian-distributed noise term, where the noise between measurements made by different methods is independent of each other. However, this noise arises in the process of measuring the same quantitative value, and thus can be correlated. To address this limitation, we propose a no-gold-standard evaluation (NGSE) technique that models this correlated noise by a multi-variate Gaussian distribution parameterized by a covariance matrix. We derive a maximum-likelihood-based approach to estimate the parameters that describe the relationship between the true and measured values, without any knowledge of the true values. We then use the estimated slopes and diagonal elements of the covariance matrix to compute the noise-to-slope ratio (NSR) to rank the QI methods on the basis of precision. The proposed NGSE technique was evaluated with multiple numerical experiments. Our results showed that the technique reliably estimated the NSR values and yielded accurate rankings of the considered methods for ~ 83% of 160 trials. In particular, the technique correctly identified the most precise method for ~ 97% of the trials. Overall, this study demonstrates the efficacy of the NGSE technique to accurately rank different QI methods when the correlated noise is present, and without access to any knowledge of the ground truth. The results motivate further validation of this technique with realistic simulation studies and patient data.

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods are showing promise in multiple medical-imaging applications. Thus, there is substantial interest in clinical translation of these methods, requiring in turn, that they be evaluated rigorously. In this paper, our goal is to lay out a framework for objective task-based evaluation of AI methods. We will also provide a list of tools available in the literature to conduct this evaluation. Further, we outline the important role of physicians in conducting these evaluation studies. The examples in this paper will be proposed in the context of PET with a focus on neural-network-based methods. However, the framework is also applicable to evaluate other medical-imaging modalities and other types of AI methods.

Objective evaluation of new and improved methods for PET imaging requires access to images with ground truth, as can be obtained through simulation studies. However, for these studies to be clinically relevant, it is important that the simulated images are clinically realistic. In this study, we develop a stochastic and physics-based method to generate realistic oncological two-dimensional (2-D) PET images, where the ground-truth tumor properties are known. The developed method extends upon a previously proposed approach. The approach captures the observed variabilities in tumor properties from actual patient population. Further, we extend that approach to model intra-tumor heterogeneity using a lumpy object model. To quantitatively evaluate the clinical realism of the simulated images, we conducted a human-observer study. This was a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) study with trained readers (five PET physicians and one PET physicist). Our results showed that the readers had an average of ~ 50% accuracy in the 2AFC study. Further, the developed simulation method was able to generate wide varieties of clinically observed tumor types. These results provide evidence for the application of this method to 2-D PET imaging applications, and motivate development of this method to generate 3-D PET images.

Objective evaluation of quantitative imaging (QI) methods using measurements directly obtained from patient images is highly desirable but hindered by the non-availability of gold standards. To address this issue, statistical techniques have been proposed to objectively evaluate QI methods without a gold standard. These techniques assume that the measured and true values are linearly related by a slope, bias, and normally distributed noise term, where it is assumed that the noise term between the different methods is independent. However, the noise could be correlated since it arises in the process of measuring the same true value. To address this issue, we propose a new no-gold-standard evaluation (NGSE) technique that models this noise as a multivariate normally distributed term, characterized by a covariance matrix. In this manuscript, we derive a maximum-likelihood-based technique that, without any knowledge of the true QI values, estimates the slope, bias, and covariance matrix terms. These are then used to rank the methods on the basis of precision of the measured QI values. Overall, the derivation demonstrates the mathematical premise behind the proposed NGSE technique.

Tumor segmentation in oncological PET is challenging, a major reason being the partial-volume effects that arise due to low system resolution and finite voxel size. The latter results in tissue-fraction effects, i.e. voxels contain a mixture of tissue classes. Conventional segmentation methods are typically designed to assign each voxel in the image as belonging to a certain tissue class. Thus, these methods are inherently limited in modeling tissue-fraction effects. To address the challenge of accounting for partial-volume effects, and in particular, tissue-fraction effects, we propose a Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentation. Specifically, this Bayesian approach estimates the posterior mean of fractional volume that the tumor occupies within each voxel of the image. The proposed method, implemented using a deep-learning-based technique, was first evaluated using clinically realistic 2-D simulation studies with known ground truth, in the context of segmenting the primary tumor in PET images of patients with lung cancer. The evaluation studies demonstrated that the method accurately estimated the tumor-fraction areas and significantly outperformed widely used conventional PET segmentation methods, including a U-net-based method, on the task of segmenting the tumor. In addition, the proposed method was relatively insensitive to partial-volume effects and yielded reliable tumor segmentation for different clinical-scanner configurations. The method was then evaluated using clinical images of patients with stage IIB/III non-small cell lung cancer from ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 multi-center clinical trial. Here, the results showed that the proposed method significantly outperformed all other considered methods and yielded accurate tumor segmentation on patient images with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.82 (95 % CI: [0.78, 0.86]).

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of shape and heterogeneity features in both Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) components of PET/CT. A secondary objective was to investigate the impact of image quantization.Material and methods: A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act -compliant secondary analysis of deidentified prospectively acquired PET/CT test-retest datasets of 74 patients from multi-center Merck and ACRIN trials was performed. Metabolically active volumes were automatically delineated on PET with Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian algorithm. 3DSlicerTM was used to semi-automatically delineate the anatomical volumes on low-dose CT components. Two quantization methods were considered: a quantization into a set number of bins (quantizationB) and an alternative quantization with bins of fixed width (quantizationW). Four shape descriptors, ten first-order metrics and 26 textural features were computed. Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify repeatability. Features were subsequently categorized as very reliable, reliable, moderately reliable and poorly reliable with respect to the corresponding volume variability. Results: Repeatability was highly variable amongst features. Numerous metrics were identified as poorly or moderately reliable. Others were (very) reliable in both modalities, and in all categories (shape, 1st-, 2nd- and 3rd-order metrics). Image quantization played a major role in the features repeatability. Features were more reliable in PET with quantizationB, whereas quantizationW showed better results in CT.Conclusion: The test-retest repeatability of shape and heterogeneity features in PET and low-dose CT varied greatly amongst metrics. The level of repeatability also depended strongly on the quantization step, with different optimal choices for each modality. The repeatability of PET and low-dose CT features should be carefully taken into account when selecting metrics to build multiparametric models., Comment: Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2016