1. Cervical cytology: A randomized comparison of four sampling methods
- Author
-
Marian L. McCord, Sidney A. Coleman, Janel L. Meric, Thomas G. Stovall, and Robert L. Summitt
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Biopsy ,Cervix Uteri ,law.invention ,Random Allocation ,Randomized controlled trial ,Obstetrics and gynaecology ,Pregnancy ,law ,Cytology ,Uterine Cervical Dysplasia ,Screening method ,Humans ,Medicine ,Vaginal Smears ,Colposcopy ,Gynecology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Cervical cytology ,Equipment Design ,body regions ,Cytopathology ,Female ,business - Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare smear quality and endocervical cell recovery of four cervical smear sampling devices. Study design: Two thousand fifteen patients undergoing routine cervical smears at the University of Tennessee Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics were randomly assigned to a cotton swab-spatula, Cytobrush-spatula, Cervex-Brush, or Bayne Pap Brush. The cytopathology laboratory, blind to method, used specific criteria to grade smears as being optimal, adequate, marginal, or inadequate. Statistical analysis was by the χ 2 and analysis of variance tests. Results: No statistical differences occurred among the groups for nonpregnant patients. For pregnant patients smear quality was improved with both Cytobrush-spatula and Bayne Pap Brush versus cotton swab-spatula ( p = 0.0301 and 0.0004, respectively); cotton swab-spatula had fewer endocervical cells than the Cytobrush-spatula ( p = 0.0001), Cervex-Brush ( p = 0.0288), and Bayne Pap Brush ( p = 0.0081). Conclusions: The cotton swab-spatula and Cytobrush-spatula appear to be the most effective screening methods for nonpregnant and pregnant patients, respectively.
- Published
- 1992
- Full Text
- View/download PDF