Search

Background Traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are a common presentation to emergency care, the first-line investigation often being plain radiography. The interpretation of this imaging frequently falls to less experienced clinicians despite well-established challenges in reporting. This study presents novel data of clinicians’ confidence in interpreting trauma radiographs, their perception of AI in healthcare, and their support for the development of systems applied to skeletal radiography. Methods A novel questionnaire was distributed through a network of collaborators to clinicians across the Southeast of England. Over a three-month period, responses were compiled into a database before undergoing statistical review. Results The responses of 297 participants were included. The mean self-assessed knowledge of AI in healthcare was 3.68 out of ten, with significantly higher knowledge reported by the most senior doctors (Specialty Trainee/Specialty Registrar or above = 4.88). 13.8% of participants reported an awareness of AI in their clinical practice. Overall, participants indicated substantial favourability towards AI in healthcare (7.87) and in AI applied to skeletal radiography (7.75). There was a preference for a hypothetical system indicating positive findings rather than ruling as negative (7.26 vs 6.20). Conclusions This study identifies clear support, amongst a cross section of student and qualified doctors, for both the general use of AI technology in healthcare and in its application to skeletal radiography for trauma. The development of systems to address this demand appear well founded and popular. The engagement of a small but reticent minority should be sought, along with improving the wider education of doctors on AI.

Background - Traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are a common presentation to emergency care, the first-line investigation often being plain radiography. The interpretation of this imaging frequently falls to less experienced clinicians despite well-established challenges in reporting. This study presents novel data of clinicians’ confidence in interpreting trauma radiographs, their perception of AI in healthcare, and their support for the development of systems applied to skeletal radiography.Methods- A novel questionnaire was distributed through a network of collaborators to clinicians across the Southeast of England. Over a three-month period, responses were compiled into a database before undergoing statistical review. Results- The responses of 297 participants were included. The mean self-assessed knowledge of AI in healthcare was 3.68 out of ten, with significantly higher knowledge reported by the most senior doctors (ST3/SpR or above=4.88). 13.8% of participants reported an awareness of AI in their clinical practice. Overall, participants indicated substantial favourability towards AI in healthcare (7.87) and in AI applied to skeletal radiography (7.75). There was a preference for a hypothetical system indicating positive findings rather than ruling as negative (7.26 vs 6.20).Conclusions - This study identifies clear support, amongst a cross section of student and qualified doctors, for both the general use of AI technology in healthcare and in its application to skeletal radiography for trauma. The development of systems to address this demand appear well founded and popular. The engagement of a small but reticent minority should be sought, along with improving the wider education of doctors on AI.

Introduction The management of recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) typically requires repeated transurethral resections under general anaesthesia. This is costly and results in poor health-related quality-of-life for patients. Outpatient-based laser ablation and diathermy to recurrent tumours could reduce morbidity and cost of managing NMIBC. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of outpatient-based diathermy or laser ablation for recurrent NMIBC. Method The EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library were searched until June 2020. All studies evaluating the use of outpatient diathermy or laser ablation for NMIBC were included. The quality of evidence and risk of bias were assessed using the GRADE and ROBINS-I tools, respectively. Results From 1328 studies identified, 17 studies (1584 patients) were included. Overall, the majority of tumours (80%) were low-grade (G1 and G2). Laser ablation and diathermy resulted in a mean recurrence rate of 47% and 40% at 20-31 months follow-up, respectively, with a mean progression rate of 3-11%. Both procedures were well-tolerated with low pain scores (mean score of 1) and low periprocedural complication rates. However, the overall quality of evidence of low. Conclusions This review demonstrates that both procedures have good short-term efficacy in patients with low-grade NMIBC. The procedures are well-tolerated with low complication rates and importantly, reduce the need for intervention under general anaesthesia. These findings can aid patient counselling regarding less invasive treatment options, avoiding the morbidity of transurethral resection. Future randomised studies with standardised risk stratification and outcome measures are required to add to the quality of evidence.

Aim The challenge of managing first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) joint osteoarthritis is the lack of guidance on which surgical intervention is superior. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares joint replacement (JR) and trapeziectomy techniques to provide an update. Method In August 2020, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies that compared these two techniques for the treatment of CMC-1 joint osteoarthritis (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42020189728). Primary outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), QuickDASH and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Secondary outcomes, such as total complication, dislocation, and revision surgery rates, were also measured. Results From 1909 studies identified, 14 studies (1005 patients) were eligible. Our meta-analysis found that post-operative QuickDASH score was lower for patients in the JR group, indicating decreased disability following this technique (5 studies, p = 0.0002). However, pain VAS scores were similar between the two groups (5 studies, p = 0.22). Interestingly, JR techniques had significantly greater odds of overall complications (12 studies; OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.17-4.40, p = 0.02) and significantly greater odds of revision surgery (9 studies; OR 5.14; 95% CI 2.06-12.81, p = 0.0004). Conclusions Overall, based on low to moderate quality evidence, we found that JR treatments may result in better function with less disability with comparable pain (VAS) scores; however, JR has greater odds of complications and greater odds of requiring revision surgery. More robust RCTs that compare JR and TRAP with standardised outcome measures and long-term follow-up would add to the overall quality of evidence.

Aim Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is the most prevalent form of bladder cancer, predominantly affecting the elderly population. The most common treatment for recurrent NMIBC is transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT), which carries a risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality in this often-co-morbid population. Outpatient laser ablation of low-grade NMIBC recurrences is a minimally invasive treatment option, but long-term efficacy is poorly reported. Method We retrospectively reviewed the case notes of all patients treated with Holmium:YAG laser ablation from 2008-2016. Data regarding patient demographics, original histology, dates of procedures, follow-up time, recurrence, progression, and complications were recorded. Results A total of 199 procedures were performed on 97 patients (mean age of 83.56), 73 (75.3%) of which originally had low-grade (G1 or G2) tumours. Overall, 55 (56.7%) patients developed tumour recurrence at long-term follow-up (mean 5.36 years), and only 9 (9.3%) patients had tumour progression to a higher stage or grade, but there was no progression to muscle-invasive disease. The median recurrence-free, progression-free and overall survival times were 1.69 years (95% CI 1.20-2.25), 5.70 years (95% CI 4.10-7.60) and 7.60 years (95% CI 4.90-8.70), respectively. No patients required emergency inpatient admission after laser ablation for any associated complications. Conclusions Office-based Holmium: YAG laser ablation is an oncologically-safe method of managing recurrent low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the long-term, with no patients progressing to muscle-invasive disease. Furthermore, the procedure is safe, and no significant complications were seen in this elderly and co-morbid population.

Background Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are a common form of assessment used across medical schools in the UK to assess clinical competence and practical skills and are traditionally held in an in-person format. In the past, medical students have often prepared for such exams through in-person peer-assisted learning (PAL), however, due to the recent Covid-19 pandemic, many in-person teaching sessions transitioned to online-based formats. There is currently a paucity of research on the utility of virtual PAL OSCE sessions and thus, we carried out a national pilot study to determine the feasibility of virtual OSCE teaching via feedback from participants and examiners. Methods A total of 85 students from 19 UK-based medical schools with eight students based internationally attended the series of online OSCE workshops delivered via Zoom®. All students and examiners completed a feedback questionnaire at the end of each session regarding parameters, which included questions on pre-and post-workshop confidence in three OSCE domains: history-taking, communication and data interpretation. A Likert scale using 5 Likert items was used to self-report confidence, and the results were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test after assessing for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Results Results from student feedback showed an increase in confidence for all three OSCE domains after each event (p Conclusion Most participants in the virtual OSCE sessions reported an improvement in their confidence in history-taking, communication and data interpretation skills. Of the participants and examiners that had also experienced in-person OSCE examinations, the majority also reported that they found virtual OSCE sessions to be as engaging and as interactive as in-person teaching. This study has demonstrated that virtual OSCE workshops are a feasible option with the potential to be beneficial beyond the pandemic. However, more studies are required to assess the overall impact on student learning and to determine the value of virtual OSCE workshops on exam performance.

Background Core Surgical Training (CST) is a competitive two-year postgraduate training program in the UK that is scored based on three equally weighted stations: management, clinical and portfolio. Preparing a surgical portfolio can start in medical school, however, there is limited guidance on what forms a competitive portfolio with the majority of advice coming from university resources and national societies which are variable throughout the country. Our aim was to assess the utility of a webinar to educate students and doctors on the CST portfolio to address this disparity. Methods Pre- and post-event questionnaires that included demographic data, 10-point Likert scales to self-report confidence on the understanding of the CST portfolio and its domains, and questions on utilising webinars were distributed to attendees. Pre- and post-event responses were paired, and scores were assessed for normality via the Shapiro–Wilk test; the Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess statistical significance. Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated to report standardised differences between pre-and post-event scores. Results A total of 177 participants from over 24 countries responded to both questionnaires. A statistically significant improvement in awareness of how to score maximum points was demonstrated across all nine CST domains (p Conclusions This study has demonstrated that a webinar can be effectively utilised to educate students and doctors on the various domains of the CST portfolio and how to maximise points in each section. Such events could address the variability of university resources and national societies across the country and provide equal opportunities for students. Further studies that directly compare webinars with in-person events and investigate long-term outcomes, such as success in CST applications, are required.

Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis directly compares joint replacement (JR) and trapeziectomy techniques to provide an update as to which surgical intervention is superior for first carpometacarpal (CMC-1) joint osteoarthritis. Methods In August 2020, MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies that compared these two techniques for the treatment of CMC-1 joint osteoarthritis (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42020189728). Primary outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), QuickDASH (QDASH) and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Secondary outcomes, such as total complication, dislocation and revision surgery rates, were also measured. Results From 1909 studies identified, 14 studies (1005 patients) were eligible. Our meta-analysis found that post-operative QDASH scores were lower for patients in the JR group (five studies, p = 0.0004). Similarly, significantly better postoperative key pinch strength in favour of JR was noted (three studies, p = 0.001). However, pain (VAS) scores were similar between the two groups (five studies, p = 0.21). Moreover, JR techniques had significantly greater odds of overall complications (12 studies; OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.13–3.96, p = 0.02) and significantly greater odds of revision surgery (9 studies; OR 5.14; 95% CI 2.06–12.81, p = 0.0004). Conclusion Overall, based on very low- to moderate-quality evidence, JR treatments may result in better function with less disability with comparable pain (VAS) scores; however, JR has greater odds of complications and greater odds of requiring revision surgery. More robust RCTs that compare JR and TRAP with standardised outcome measures and long-term follow-up would add to the overall quality of evidence.

Context Management of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is costly and associated with negative health-related quality-of-life effects, in part because of the frequent need for repeated transurethral resections under general/regional anaesthesia. Outpatient-based diathermy or laser ablation is another option, but evidence for its efficacy is mixed and its use is controversial. Objective To systematically review evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of outpatient diathermy and laser ablation for the treatment of recurrent NMIBC. Evidence acquisition The EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 26, 2020. All studies evaluating the use of diathermy or laser ablation for bladder tumours (new or recurrent) in an outpatient setting under local anaesthetic were included. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, searched the reference lists of retrieved articles, and performed the data extraction. The quality of evidence and risk of bias were assessed using the GRADE and ROBINS-I tools. Evidence synthesis The search yielded 1328 studies. After excluding duplicates, 1319 titles and abstracts were screened and 17 studies (1584 patients) were eligible for inclusion in the final review. The majority of patients had small, low-grade tumours, but there was heterogeneity in the inclusion criteria. Overall, laser ablation and diathermy resulted in mean recurrence rates of 47% and 32% at follow-up of 22–38 mo, respectively, with a mean progression rate of 3–12% (low certainty of evidence). Both procedures were well tolerated, with low pain scores and low periprocedural complication rates (moderate certainty of evidence). Conclusions Outpatient diathermy and laser ablation have good short-term efficacy in patients with low-grade NMIBC and reduce the need for intervention under general/regional anaesthesia. The procedures are well tolerated with low complication rates. The overall certainty of evidence is low, with heterogeneity between studies and methodological limitations. However, we have highlighted the need for randomised trials with long-term follow-up using standardised risk classification and outcome measures. Despite these limitations, the findings will aid in patient counselling regarding this less invasive treatment option that avoids the morbidity of transurethral resection. Patient summary Outpatient diathermy and laser ablation have good success rates in treating recurrent low-grade bladder tumours in the short term, avoiding the need for more invasive procedures under general/regional anaesthesia, with low rates of side effects. Further studies are needed to determine whether these treatments remain safe and effective in the long term.

Echocardiography is a key diagnostic procedure, but delays or requests overload might compromise its contribution to the clinical decision process. This project aimed at speeding the availability of echocardiograms results by applying two strategies: 1) Introducing a provisional report (PR) to be delivered immediately to doctors; 2) Reducing the number of referral requests by changing the triage process. Baseline data were gathered during a 9-week period. The first intervention cycle applied strategy1 by introducing a PR given verbally by echocardiographers to doctors which contained key clinically relevant findings. Rate of uptake of the PR and time from echocardiogram completion to PR availability were monitored during the following 6 weeks. Strategy2 was implemented 4 weeks after the conclusion of cycle1 and introduced triaging by cardiologists. They determined echocardiogram appropriateness which we expected to reduce the number of overall referrals. Number of requests and time from referral to echocardiogram completion to report availability were monitored during the following 6 weeks. Semi-structured questionnaires proposed at the end of both cycles explored participants’ views of the effects of the changes. Cycle1 resulted in a 78% reduction of the median time used to get relevant information to clinicians. However, PR uptake varied across the observation window reaching at best 40%. Cycle2 resulted in a 40% reduction in the median number of referrals per week and in a 31% reduction of the median time needed from referral to full report. 62% of the doctors reported they noticed improvements in reporting speed after cycle1, which increased to 71% after cycle2. 87% of participants felt strategy1 and 71% felt strategy2 improved patient timely discharge. Significant improvements in the reporting times of key clinical information can be achieved; however, sustainability and staff engagement are key factors that can influence adherence and long-term outcomes.

Dear EditorWe have read with great interest the article by Grecco (2019) which, based on his own experience as a patient, discusses whether the US medical education system prioritizes the scientifi...