Search

Use of immunoassay test strips for the detection of fentanyl in drug samples has become commonplace in harm reduction, law enforcement, public health, customs, and forensic science settings for testing drug product. With the increase of xylazine in the drug supply in recent years, use of xylazine test strips has also increased. As use of test strips expands, a desire to implement them for other drugs may emerge. However, since these strips are designed for urine testing, it is important to understand their applicability to testing drug product. In this work, we investigate the utility of seven types of urine immunoassay test strips - amphetamine, benzodiazepine, cocaine, methamphetamine, nitazene, opiate, and xylazine - for drug checking applications. Reproducibility, sensitivity, cross-reactivity, and the effect of prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures were studied. Generally, the tests were found to be reproducible, able to detect trace (μg/mL) levels of the analyte of interest, and minimally affected by prolonged storage at elevated temperatures. Nearly all tests showed cross-reactivity with compounds other than the analyte of interest, highlighting the need to better understand these limitations prior to implementation in a drug checking scenario. The viability of expired cocaine, fentanyl, and methamphetamine test strips was also interrogated, and little to no change in sensitivity was found even though the tests were multiple years expired.

Introduction: Xylazine is a veterinary anesthetic increasingly present alongside illicit fentanyl in the US and Canada, presenting novel health risks. Although xylazine remains less common in the Western US, Mexican border cities serve as key trafficking hubs and may have higher prevalence of novel substances, but surveillance has been limited., Methods: We examined deidentified records from the Prevencasa harm reduction clinic in Tijuana, describing urine and paraphernalia testing from patients reporting using illicit opioids within 24 hr. Xylazine (two types), fentanyl, opiate, methamphetamine, amphetamine, benzodiazepine, and nitazene test strips were used to test urine and paraphernalia samples. Paraphernalia samples were also analyzed with mass spectrometry., Results: The study consisted of 23 participants that provided both urine and paraphernalia samples. Of the participants studied, 100 %, 91.3 %, and 69.6 % reported using China White/fentanyl, methamphetamine, and tar heroin, respectively. The mean age was 41.7 years, 95.7 % were male, 65.2 % were unhoused, and 30.4 % had skin wounds at the time of sample collection.Xylazine positivity in urine, for the two types used, was 82.6 % and 65.2 %. For paraphernalia testing, the xylazine positivity was 65.2 % and 47.8 %. Confirmatory testing of paraphernalia samples by mass spectrometry indicated a 52.2 % xylazine positivity. This testing also revealed positivity rates for fentanyl (73.9 %), fluorofentanyl (30.4 %), tramadol (30.4 %), and lidocaine (30.4 %).The mass spectrometry results suggest lidocaine triggered n = 3 and n = 0 false positives among the xylazine test strip types. A total of n = 0 and n = 1 false negatives were also observed., Discussion: Xylazine is present on the U.S.-Mexico border, requiring public health intervention. High lidocaine positivity complicates the clinical detection of xylazine via testing strips. Xylazine was found to be more prevalent in urine than in paraphernalia samples. Confirmatory urine studies are needed to better understand possible complications of using test strips for toxicological testing., Competing Interests: Disclosures Authors declare no disclosures or competing interests. Funders played no role in the study design or implementation.

Background and Aims: Extended release buprenorphine injection (INJ-BUP) has been available in the United States since 2018. INJ-BUP has the potential to positively impact opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment outcomes by providing additional treatment options . As one of the largest payers of OUD treatment in the US, Medicaid coverage is important for access and uptake of INJ-BUP. Uptake of INJ-BUP among Medicaid beneficiaries has not been described since 2019 and variation in uptake by state has not previously been explored. We aimed to measure prescribing of INJ-BUP for Medicaid beneficiaries since 2018, nationwide and by state., Methods: We analyzed State Drug Utilization Data from 2017 to 2022 and calculated the number of prescription fills for INJ-BUP and oral buprenorphine paid by Medicaid. To compare across states, we calculated the number of prescription fills per 100 Medicaid beneficiaries treated for OUD using data from Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Substance Use Disorder (T-MSIS SUD) Data Books. Data sources are publicly available., Results: The number of prescription fills for INJ-BUP paid by Medicaid increased from 4322 (0.1% of all buprenorphine prescription fills) in 2018 to 186 861 (2.0%) in 2022. Each year the increase in fills exceeded the prior year change, indicating accelerating uptake. There was notable variability across states., Conclusions: The number of extended release buprenorphine injection prescriptions among US Medicaid beneficiaries treated for opioid use disorder increased from over 4000 prescriptions in 2018 to over 185 000 in 2022 but uptake is much less than observed in other countries over shorter time periods., (© 2024 Society for the Study of Addiction.)

Background: The United States (US) is an extreme global outlier for drug-related death rates. However, data describing drug-related deaths are generally available only on an 8-13-month lag. Furthermore, granular details about substance-involvement are often not available, which particularly stymies efforts to track fatal polysubstance and novel psychoactive substance use. Detailed medical examiner records provide a powerful source of information for drug-related death surveillance, but have been underutilized., Methods: We pooled medical examiner data from five US states and 14 counties that together comprise 18% of the US population to examine demographic, geographic, and drug-specific trends in polysubstance drug-related deaths. We employed mixed effects logistic regression to identify demographic factors associated with polysubstance rather than single substance drug-related deaths. We assessed the correlations between drug classes and described geographic variation in the prevalence of specific drugs and the presence of novel and emerging psychoactive substances., Results: Our sample included 73,077 drug-related deaths from 2012 through early 2022. Nearly two-thirds of drug-related deaths were polysubstance-involved, with the number and percentage growing annually. High percentages of polysubstance drug-related deaths were observed in both urban and rural jurisdictions. After adjusting for year and jurisdiction, female, American Indian and Alaska Native, and White individuals had the most elevated odds of polysubstance drug-related deaths. Drug-related deaths involving benzodiazepines or opioids, whether pharmaceutical or illicit, and other pharmaceutical drugs were most likely to have polysubstance involvement, while methamphetamine-involved deaths were least likely to involve multiple substances. Strong correlations were observed between prescription opioids and prescription benzodiazepines, fentanyl and xylazine, and designer benzodiazepines and novel synthetic opioids., Conclusions: Analysis of detailed medical examiner records reveals the breadth and complexity of polysubstance drug-related deaths in the US. Future efforts to use this unique resource can improve population-based surveillance of drug-related deaths to better tailor interventions and solutions to this critical health crisis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The UK and USA currently report their highest number of drug-related deaths since records began, with higher rates among individuals experiencing homelessness., Aims: Given that overdose prevention in homeless populations may require unique strategies, we evaluated whether substances implicated in death differed between (a) housed decedents and those experiencing homelessness and (b) between US and UK homeless populations., Method: We conducted an internationally comparative retrospective cohort study utilising multilevel multinomial regression modelling of coronial/medical examiner-verified drug-related deaths from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2021. UK data were available for England, Wales and Northern Ireland; US data were collated from eight county jurisdictions. Data were available on decedent age, sex, ethnicity, housing status and substances implicated in death., Results: Homeless individuals accounted for 16.3% of US decedents versus 3.4% in the UK. Opioids were implicated in 66.3 and 50.4% of all studied drug-related deaths in the UK and the USA respectively. UK homeless decedents had a significantly increased risk of having only opioids implicated in death compared with only non-opioids implicated (relative risk ratio RRR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.76-1.98, P < 0.001); conversely, US homeless decedents had a significantly decreased risk (RRR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.29-0.48, P < 0.001). Methamphetamine was implicated in two-thirds (66.7%) of deaths among US homeless decedents compared with 0.4% in the UK., Conclusions: Both the rate and type of drug-related deaths differ significantly between homeless and housed populations in the UK and USA. The two countries also differ in drugs implicated in death. Targeted programmes for country-specific implicated drug profiles appear warranted.

Aims: To characterize polysubstance death in the United States during the transition to the fourth wave of the drug overdose crisis. To characterize co-involved substances in fatal overdose involving synthetic opioids (mainly illicitly manufactured fentanyl analogues) by year, state, and intersectional sociodemographic groups., Design: Population-based study of national death records., Setting: United States., Participants/cases: All people who died from drug overdose in the United States between 2010 and 2021., Measurements: Percentage of all fatal overdose involving fentanyls, stimulants, and other drugs. Most commonly co-involved substances in fentanyl overdose by state and year. Percentage of fatal fentanyl overdose co-involving stimulants by state and year. Percentage of fatal fentanyl overdose co-involving stimulants by intersectional region, race/ethnicity, age, and sex., Findings: The percent of US overdose deaths involving both fentanyl and stimulants increased from 0.6% (n = 235) in 2010 to 32.3% (34 429) in 2021, with the sharpest rise starting in 2015. In 2010, fentanyl was most commonly found alongside prescription opioids, benzodiazepines, and alcohol. In the Northeast this shifted to heroin-fentanyl co-involvement in the mid-2010s, and nearly universally to cocaine-fentanyl co-involvement by 2021. Universally in the West, and in the majority of states in the South and Midwest, methamphetamine-fentanyl co-involvement predominated by 2021. The proportion of stimulant involvement in fentanyl-involved overdose deaths rose in virtually every state 2015-2021. Intersectional group analysis reveals particularly high rates for older Black and African American individuals living in the West., Conclusions: By 2021 stimulants were the most common drug class found in fentanyl-involved overdoses in every state in the US. The rise of deaths involving cocaine and methamphetamine must be understood in the context of a drug market dominated by illicit fentanyls, which have made polysubstance use more sought-after and commonplace. The widespread concurrent use of fentanyl and stimulants, as well as other polysubstance formulations, presents novel health risks and public health challenges., (© 2023 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.)

Background: Fentanyl- and methamphetamine-based counterfeit prescription drugs have driven escalating overdose death rates in the US, however their presence in Mexico has not been assessed. Our ethnographic team has conducted longitudinal research focused on illicit drug markets in Northern Mexico since 2018. In 2021-2022, study participants described the arrival of new, unusually potent tablets sold as ostensibly controlled substances, without a prescription, directly from pharmacies that cater to US tourists., Aims: To characterize the availability of counterfeit and authentic controlled substances at pharmacies in Northern Mexico available to English-speaking tourists without a prescription., Methods: We employed an iterative, exploratory, mixed methods design. Longitudinal ethnographic data was used to characterize tourist-oriented micro-neighborhoods and guide the selection of n=40 pharmacies in n=4 cities in Northern Mexico. In each pharmacy, samples of "oxycodone", "Xanax", and "Adderall" were sought as single pills, during English-language encounters, after which detailed ethnographic accounts were recorded. We employed immunoassay-based testing strips to check each pill for the presence of fentanyls, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, and methamphetamines. We used Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy to further characterize drug contents., Results: Of n=40 pharmacies, one or more of the requested controlled substances could be obtained with no prescription (as single pills or in bottles) at 28 (70.0%) and as single pills at 19 (47.5%). Counterfeit pills were obtained at 11 pharmacies (27.5%). Of n=45 samples sold as one-off controlled substances, 18 were counterfeit. 7 of 11 (63.6%) samples sold as "Adderall" contained methamphetamine, 8 of 27 (29.6%) samples sold as "Oxycodone" contained fentanyl, and 3 "Oxycodone" samples contained heroin. Pharmacies providing counterfeit drugs were uniformly located in tourist-serving micro-neighborhoods, and generally featured English-language advertisements for erectile dysfunction medications and "painkillers". Pharmacy employees occasionally expressed concern about overdose risk and provided harm reduction guidance., Discussion: The availability of fentanyl-, heroin-, and methamphetamine-based counterfeit medications in tourist-oriented independent pharmacies in Northern Mexico represents a public health risk, and occurs in the context of 1) the normalization of medical tourism as a response to rising unaffordability of healthcare in the US, 2) plummeting rates of opioid prescription in the US, affecting both chronic pain patients and the availability of legitimate pharmaceuticals on the unregulated market, 3) the rise of fentanyl-based counterfeit opioids as a key driver of the fourth, and deadliest-to-date, wave of the opioid crisis. It was not possible to distinguish counterfeit medications based on appearance of pills or geography of pharmacies, because identically-appearing authentic and counterfeit versions were often sold in close geographic proximity. Nevertheless, people who consume drugs may be more trusting of controlled substances purchased directly from pharmacies. Due to Mexico's limited opioid overdose surveillance infrastructure, the current death rate from these substances remains unknown., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare to disclosures or competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We conducted a population-based observational study of all medical examiner cases in Los Angeles County from January 2012 through June 2021 in which methamphetamine was listed as a cause of or contributing factor to death (n = 6125). We aimed to characterize demographics, comorbidities, and co-involved substances in methamphetamine-related deaths longitudinally in Los Angeles County, California., Methods: We used detailed death record data to manually classify fatalities by involvement of each organ system, opioids, alcohol, cocaine, other drugs or medications, and external/traumatic causes. Primary outcomes included: the number of methamphetamine-involved deaths, demographics of decedents, percentage of methamphetamine deaths also involving other drugs, and percentage of methamphetamine deaths involving different organ systems. We performed Mann Kendall tests of trends to identify statistically significant longitudinal changes., Results: During the study period, the percentage of methamphetamine-related deaths involving opioids significantly increased from 16 % in 2012 to 54 % in 2021 (p < 0.001). Concurrently, the percentage involving cardiovascular causes significantly decreased from 47 % to 26 % (p < 0.05). Methamphetamine-related deaths in LAC increasingly affected people experiencing homelessness, for whom the percentage tripled from 13 % in 2012 to 35 % in 2021. The share of decedents under 40 years old increased from 33 % to 41 %. The percentage of Black or African American decedents increased over five-fold from 3 % to 17 %., Conclusions: Methamphetamine-related deaths involving opioids more than tripled in Los Angeles County from 2012 to 2021, reflecting the drug supply's shift to illicit fentanyl. More than a quarter involved cardiovascular causes. These findings have implications for treatment and prevention, including scaling up contingency management, distributing naloxone to people who primarily use stimulants, and including cardiovascular care alongside these interventions directly targeted to reduce harms of methamphetamine use., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None to declare., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose of Review: During the current overdose crisis in the United States and Canada, both polysubstance use and interventions involving people with lived experience of substance use disorder have grown. This review investigates the intersection of these topics to recommend best practices., Recent Findings: We identified four themes from the recent literature. These are ambivalence about the term lived experience and the practice of using private disclosure to gain rapport or credibility; efficacy of peer participation; promoting equitable participation by fairly compensating staff hired for their lived experience; challenges unique to the current polysubstance-dominated era of the overdose crisis. People with lived experience make important contributions to research and treatment, especially given the additional challenges that polysubstance use creates above and beyond single substance use disorder. The same lived experience that can make someone an excellent peer support worker also often comes with both trauma related to working with people struggling with substance use and lack of opportunities for career advancement., Summary: Policy priorities for clinicians, researchers and organizations should include steps to foster equitable participation, such as recognizing expertise by experience with fair compensation; offering career advancement opportunities; and promoting self-determination in how people describe themselves., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Historically, overdose mortality rates among Hispanics have been lower than non-Hispanics. The purpose of this analysis was to characterize the U.S. overdose crisis among Hispanics compared to non-Hispanics., Methods: We used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiological Research (WONDER) platform to obtain drug overdose mortality rates per 100,000 population between 2010 and 2021 for Hispanics and non-Hispanics. We examined the relative percent change and specific drug involvement (2010-2021) and state-level disparities (2010-2020) among Hispanics versus non-Hispanics. We calculated rate ratios by state and annual percent change in total and for each specific drug. Statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.0.3 (R Project for Statistical Computing)., Results: Nationally, from 2010 to 2021, Hispanic overdose rates rose from 5.6 to 21.7 per 100,000, an increase of 287.5 % compared to 13.5-35.1 per 100,000, an increase of 160 % among non-Hispanics. The average annual percent change was 12 % for Hispanics and 9 % for non-Hispanics. The three most common drug classes involved in overdose deaths among both groups included: Fentanyls and synthetic opioids; cocaine; and prescription opioids. Hispanic overdose rates were higher than non-Hispanic rates in New Mexico, Colorado, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania in 2020, versus only Michigan in 2010., Conclusions: We observed disparities in overdose mortality growth among Hispanics compared to non-Hispanics from 2010 to 2021. These disparities highlight the urgency to develop community-centered solutions that take into consideration the social and structural inequalities that exacerbate the effects of the opioid overdose crisis on Hispanic communities., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest No conflict declared., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19, yet their vaccination coverage is lower than is that of the general population. We implemented a COVID-19 vaccination program that used evidence-based and culturally tailored approaches to promote vaccine uptake and equity for PEH in Los Angeles County, California. From February 2021 through February 2022, 33 977 doses of vaccine were administered at 2658 clinics, and 9275 PEH were fully vaccinated. This program may serve as a model for future service delivery in vulnerable populations. ( Am J Public Health . 2023;113(2):170-174. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307147).

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral medications are new to HIV treatment. People with HIV may benefit from a treatment option that better aligns with their preferences, but could also face new challenges and barriers. Authors from the fields of HIV, substance use treatment, and mental health collaborated on this commentary on the issues surrounding equitable implementation and uptake of LAI ART by drawing lessons from all three fields. We employ a socio-ecological framework beginning at the policy level and moving through the community, organizational, interpersonal, and patient levels. We look at extant literature on the topic as well as draw from the direct experience of our clinician-authors., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: Public health surveillance for overdose sometimes depends on nonfatal drug overdoses recorded in health records. However, the proportion of total overdoses identified through health record systems is unclear. Comparison of overdoses from health records to those that are self-reported may provide insight on the proportion of nonfatal overdoses that are not identified., Methods: We conducted a cohort study linking survey data on overdose from a national survey of Veterans to United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health records, including community care paid for by VA. Self-reported overdose in the prior 3 years was compared to diagnostic codes for overdoses and substance use disorders in the same time period., Results: The sensitivity of diagnostic codes for overdose, compared to self-report as a reference standard for this analysis, varied by substance: 28.1% for alcohol, 23.1% for sedatives, 12.0% for opioids, and 5.5% for cocaine. There was a notable concordance between substance use disorder diagnoses and self-reported overdose (sensitivity range 17.9%-90.6%)., Discussion and Conclusions: Diagnostic codes in health records may not identify a substantial proportion of drug overdoses. A health record diagnosis of substance use disorder may offer a stronger inference regarding the size of the population at risk. Alternatively, screening for self-reported overdose in routine clinical care could enhance overdose surveillance and targeted intervention., Scientific Significance: This study suggests that diagnostic codes for overdose are insensitive. These findings support consideration of alternative approaches to overdose surveillance in public health., (© 2022 The American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (AAAP). This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

Objective: Understanding COVID-19-related mortality among the large population of people experiencing homelessness (PEH) in Los Angeles County (LA County) may inform public health policies to protect this vulnerable group. We investigated the impact of COVID-19 on PEH compared with the general population in LA County., Methods: We calculated crude COVID-19 mortality rates per 100 000 population and mortality rates adjusted for age, race, and sex/gender among PEH and compared them with the general population in LA County from March 1, 2020, through February 28, 2021., Results: Among adults aged ≥18 years, the crude mortality rate per 100 000 population among PEH was 20% higher than among the general LA County population (348.7 vs 287.6). After adjusting for age, the mortality rate among PEH was 570.7 per 100 000 population. PEH had nearly twice the risk of dying from COVID-19 as people in the general LA County population; PEH aged 18-29 years had almost 8 times the risk of dying compared with their peers in the general LA County population. PEH had a higher risk of mortality than the general population after adjusting for race (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6) and sex/gender (SMR = 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5)., Conclusions: A higher risk of COVID-19-related death among PEH compared with the general population indicates the need for public health policies and interventions to protect this vulnerable group.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of engaging unhoused peer ambassadors (PAs) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination efforts to reach people experiencing unsheltered homelessness in Los Angeles County., Methods: From August to December 2021, vaccinated PAs aged ≥18 years who could provide informed consent were recruited during vaccination events for same-day participation. Events were held at encampments, service providers (eg, housing agencies, food lines, and mobile showers), and roving locations around Los Angeles. PAs were asked to join outreach alongside community health workers and shared their experience getting vaccinated, receiving a $25 gift card for each hour they participated. Postevent surveys evaluated how many PAs enrolled and how long they participated. In October 2021, we added a preliminary effectiveness evaluation of how many additional vaccinations were attributable to PAs. Staff who enrolled the PAs estimated the number of additional people vaccinated because of talking with the PA., Results: A total of 117 PAs were enrolled at 103 events, participating for an average of 2 hours. At events with the effectiveness evaluation, 197 additional people were vaccinated over 167 PA hours ($21.19 gift card cost per additional person vaccinated), accounting for >25% of all vaccines given at these events., Discussion: Recruiting same-day unhoused PAs is a feasible, acceptable, and preliminarily effective technique to increase COVID-19 vaccination in unsheltered settings. The findings can inform delivery of other health services for people experiencing homelessness., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Importance: Overdose is one of the leading causes of death in the US; however, surveillance data lag considerably from medical examiner determination of the death to reporting in national surveillance reports., Objective: To automate the classification of deaths related to substances in medical examiner data using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML)., Design, Setting, and Participants: Diagnostic study comparing different natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to identify substances related to overdose in 10 health jurisdictions in the US from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. Unstructured text from 35 433 medical examiner and coroners' death records was examined., Exposures: Text from each case was manually classified to a substance that was related to the death. Three feature representation methods were used and compared: text frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), global vectors for word representations (GloVe), and concept unique identifier (CUI) embeddings. Several ML algorithms were trained and best models were selected based on F-scores. The best models were tested on a hold-out test set and results were reported with 95% CIs., Main Outcomes and Measures: Text data from death certificates were classified as any opioid, fentanyl, alcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, prescription opioid, and an aggregate of other substances. Diagnostic metrics and 95% CIs were calculated for each combination of feature extraction method and machine learning classifier., Results: Of 35 433 death records analyzed (decedent median age, 58 years [IQR, 41-72 years]; 24 449 [69%] were male), the most common substances related to deaths included any opioid (5739 [16%]), fentanyl (4758 [13%]), alcohol (2866 [8%]), cocaine (2247 [6%]), methamphetamine (1876 [5%]), heroin (1613 [5%]), prescription opioids (1197 [3%]), and any benzodiazepine (1076 [3%]). The CUI embeddings had similar or better diagnostic metrics compared with word embeddings and TF-IDF for all substances except alcohol. ML classifiers had perfect or near perfect performance in classifying deaths related to any opioids, heroin, fentanyl, prescription opioids, methamphetamine, cocaine, and alcohol. Classification of benzodiazepines was suboptimal using all 3 feature extraction methods., Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study, NLP/ML algorithms demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance at classifying substances related to overdoses. These algorithms should be integrated into workflows to decrease the lag time in reporting overdose surveillance data.

Unhoused people have higher COVID-19 mortality and lower vaccine uptake than housed community members. Understanding vaccine hesitancy among unhoused people is key for developing programs that address their unique needs. A three-round, rapid, field-based survey was conducted to describe attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination. Round 1 assessed vaccine brand preference, round 2 assessed intention to accept a financial incentive for vaccination, and round 3 measured vaccine uptake and assessed reasons for vaccine readiness during implementation of a financial incentive program. A total of 5177 individuals were approached at COVID-19 vaccination events for unhoused people in Los Angeles County from May through November 2021. Analyses included 4949 individuals: 3636 (73.5%) unsheltered and 1313 (26.5%) sheltered. Per self-report, 2008 (40.6%) were already vaccinated, 1732 (35%) wanted to get vaccinated, 359 (7.3%) were not yet ready, and 850 (17.2%) did not want to get vaccinated. Brand preference was evenly split among participants (Moderna 31.0%, J&J 35.5%, either 33.5%, p = 0.74). Interest in a financial incentive differed between those who were not yet ready and those who did not want to get vaccinated (43.2% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.01). After implementing a financial incentive program, 97.4% of participants who indicated interest in vaccination were vaccinated that day; the financial incentive was the most cited reason for vaccine readiness (n = 731, 56%). This study demonstrated the utility of an iterative, field-based assessment for program implementation during the rapidly evolving pandemic. Personal engagement, a variety of brand choices, and financial incentives could be important for improving vaccine uptake among unhoused people., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: COVID-19 vaccination is a priority for people experiencing homelessness. However, there are barriers to vaccine access driven in part by mistrust towards clinicians and healthcare. Community health workers (CHWs) and Peer Ambassadors (PAs) may be able to overcome mistrust in COVID-19 vaccine outreach. An unhoused PA program for COVID-19 vaccine outreach by CHWs was implemented in Los Angeles using a participatory academic-community partnership., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate CHW perspectives on an unhoused PA COVID-19 vaccine outreach program in Los Angeles., Design: This study used a participatory community conference and qualitative focus groups to understand CHW perspectives on the PA program. The one-day conference was held in November 2021., Participants: Of the 42 conference participants, 19 CHWs participated in focus groups for two-way knowledge exchange between CHWs and researchers., Approach: Four focus groups were held during the conference, with 4-6 CHWs per group. Each group had a facilitator and two notetakers. Focus group notes were then analyzed using content analysis to derive categories of findings. CHWs reviewed the qualitative analysis to ensure that findings represented their experiences with the PA program., Key Results: The five categories of findings from focus groups were as follows: (1) PAs were effective liaisons to their peers to promote COVID-19 vaccines; (2) CHWs recognized the importance of establishing genuine trust and equitable working relationships within CHW/PA teams; (3) there were tradeoffs of integrating unhoused PAs into the existing CHW workflow; (4) CHWs had initial misgivings about the research process; and (5) there were lingering questions about the ethics of "exploiting" the invaluable trust unhoused PAs have with unhoused communities., Conclusions: CHWs were in a unique position to empower unhoused PAs to take a leadership role in reaching their peers with COVID-19 vaccines and advocate for long-term employment and housing needs., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KH has been supported by the Esther Ting Memorial Professorship at Stanford University School of Medicine and research grants from the US Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Service (RCS 04-141-3, HX-12-001, and HX002714-01A2), the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (3UG1 DA015815-17S4 and 2UG1DA015815-19), the US Food and Drug Administration, Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, the County of Santa Clara California, and the American Board of Family Medicine. He has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses from the American College of Medical Toxicology, Arizona State University, Barclays Bank, Caron Foundation, the University of Florida, the New York Museum of Modern Art, Syracuse University, West Virginia University School of Medicine, and the West Virginia Medical Professionals Health Program. He has received writing honoraria or royalties from the Association of Psychological Science, American Academy of Political and Social Science, Brookings Institution, Cambridge University Press, and Washington Monthly. He has been a paid consultant to AELIS Pharma, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard University Press. CLS has been employed by Stanford University, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Heluna Health, and the Los Angeles LGBT Center. She has received research funding or stipends from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA050771, T32DA035165), the RAND Opioid Policy Tools and Information Center), Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, and UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, and speaking honoraria or travel expenses from Emory University, New York University, UCLA, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the University of Southern California, the University of Pittsburgh, the University of Chicago, the University of Western Ontario, the Nevada State Medical Association, RAND, the University of California, Irvine, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, College on Problems of Drug Dependence, the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, HIV Research for Prevention, Addiction Health Services Research, and the American Psychopathological Association. CMA has been supported by the Arnold School of Public Health at the University of South Carolina, and by research grants from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA034634, K01DA041628, U2CDA050097, R01DA049776, and R01DA052425), the US National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (R01AA029097 and R01AA029821), and the South Carolina Department of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Services, and has been a paid consultant to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, RTI International, the Medical University of South Carolina, the State of Pennsylvania Department of Public Health, and the State of Illinois Division of Health Care and Family Services. ASBB has been supported by grants from the US National Institutes for Health (R01 DA045705), the US Veterans Health Administration (IIR 13-322 and C19 21-278), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U01CE002780), Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, the US Department of Defense, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the Michigan Health Endowment Fund, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration via sub-contracts from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, has received speaker honoraria or travel expenses from the Illinois Health and Hospital Association, the International Summit on Suicide Research, the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, the American Psychopathological Association, and the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area program, has been paid as a consultant by New York University, and has received products from Fitbit at a reduced cost and Headspace for free for research purposes. MLB has been supported by research grants from the US Department of Veterans Affairs and the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (R37-DA15612), and a Koret Foundation gift for Smart Cities and Digital Living, has received travel expenses from the University of Maryland, the University of Auckland, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the European Working Group on Stochastic Modeling, INSEAD, the University of Michigan, and the University of Oklahoma, and has been a paid consultant to Compass Lexecon and DE Shaw. JPC has received a National Science Foundation EAGER Grant on Detecting and Disrupting Illicit Supply Networks via Traffic Distribution Systems, is a consultant to the RAND Corporation's Drug Policy Research Center, has consulted with or received honoraria from the Actis—Norwegian Policy Network on Alcohol and Drugs, the Arnold Foundation, Bank of Montreal, Boston University, the Foreign Affairs, Justice Research and Statistics Association, Lisbon Addictions Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, National Affairs, the National Institute of Justice, Oxford University Press, Pew, PIRE, the Russell Sage Foundation, Springer Verlag, Stanford University, the US State Department, Texas Research Society on Alcoholism, the US Veteran's Administration, Washington Monthly, and the WT Grant Foundation. JHC has received research support or funding from the US National Institutes of Health and National Library of Medicine (R56LM013365), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF8040), the US National Science Foundation (SPO181514); Google (SPO13604), the Stanford Clinical Excellence Research Center, the Stanford Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology, and the Stanford Aging and Ethnogeriatrics Research Center (P30AG059307), which is part of the Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research programme led by the US National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health, is the co-founder of Reaction Explorer (which develops and licenses organic chemistry education software), and has been paid consulting or speaker fees by the US National Institute of Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network, Tuolc, Roche, and Younker Hyde MacFarlane. M-FC has served as president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a justice of the Supreme Court of California, the Herman Phleger Professor at Stanford Law School, a distinguished visiting jurist at the New York University School of Law, the Castle Distinguished Lecturer in Ethics, Politics, and Economics at Yale University, a member of the President & Fellows of Harvard College (the Harvard Corporation), a member of the board of directors of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, a member of the Council of the American Law Institute, chair of the board of directors of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, chair of the advisory board of the Seed Initiative at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, and a member of the advisory board at the Stanford Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Institute. His work has been supported by Stanford Law School and by a grant from the Stanford Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Institute, and he was previously chair of the advisory board of the AI Now Institute at New York University. YLH has received research grants from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA050323, DA048613, DA008227, DA043247, DA030359, DA037317, and DA15446), research funding from GW Pharmaceuticals, speaking honoraria or travel expenses, or both, from the University of North Carolina, the American Society for the Advancement of Science, the Society for Neuroscience Public Education & Communication Committee, Washington University in St Louis, Temple University, Tufts School of Medicine, Indiana University, the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, the Iowa Neuroscience Institute, the Franklin Institute, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, the Canadian Consortium for the Investigation of Cannabinoids, the University of Michigan, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the US National Institutes of Health, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine, the US National Academy of Medicine, the Mediterranean Neuroscience Society, the Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Society of Biological Psychiatry, International College of Neuropharmacology, the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies, Gordon Research Conference, the National Institutes of Health Center for Scientific Research Council, and the Society of Neuroscience. DNJ has received research grants from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and the Ontario Ministry of Health, financial support from the departments of medicine at both the University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, travel expenses or speaking honoraria from Dalhousie University, the University of Ottawa, the University of Saskatchewan, the University of Calgary, the Bloomberg Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, the American College of Physicians, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the American Society of Nephrology, the Canadian Society of Internal Medicine, the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, The Canadian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Western Canada Addiction Forum, and the Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, and payment for expert witness testimony from (and has been retained by) Sanis, a generic drug manufacturer and distributor to provide advice related to an ongoing Canadian class action, and is a volunteer member of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing. HKK has been supported by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (77667, 74275, and 73359), the John Templeton Foundation (52125), the JPB Foundation (1085 and 439), and the Association of State and Territorial Health Officers (1584), has received honoraria from Jefferson University, Jefferson Health, the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, MaineHealth Center for Tobacco Independence, Harvard University Memorial Church, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, the University of Wisconsin Medical School, Wake Forest Baptist Health (in partnership with Shaw University), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation advisory committee, the American College of Gastroenterology, and Tufts University School of Medicine, has been a consultant to the Commonwealth Fund, and is a member of the Community COVID Coalition Advisory Group, Phillips Academy Public Health Expert Advisory Panel, the Policy Advisory Group, the board of the Bipartisan Policy Center, the Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center External Advisory Board (at the Perelman School of Medicine), the American Cancer Society Eastern New England Area Council of Advisors, the American University of Beirut International Advisory Council, the US National Advisory Board, the Culture of Health Year in Review Advisory Committee and Culture of Health as a Business Imperative Initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the editorial board of the Journal of the American Medical Association, the New England Donor Services board of trustees, the Josiah Macy Jr Foundation board of directors, and the Lancet–O'Neill Institute, Georgetown University Commission on Global Health and the Law. EEK has received research funding from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development (COR 19-489, 1I01HX003063-01A1, 5I01HX001752-05, 5I01HX002737-02, 5I01HX001288-05, and 5I01HX000911-06), the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (OPD-1511-33052), the US National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (5R01AT008387-04, 5UH3AT009761- 04/5UG3AT009761-02, and 4UH3AT009765-03/5UG3AT009765-02), and the US National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1U01DK123816-01), and travel expenses from the law firm Nix Patterson representing the state of Oklahoma (to serve as an expert witness in support of the state's litigation against opioid manufacturers), the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Association of Academic Physiatrists, the Australian Pain Society, the Cleveland VA Medical Research and Education Foundation, the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, the Foundation for Medical Excellence, the Foundation for Opioid Response Efforts, the Friends of VA Medical Care and Health Research, the Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, the Indiana Institute for Medical Research, the US National Academies of Medicine, the US National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, the National Governors Association, the North American Spine Society, the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute at Stanford University, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries. AL has received consulting fees for her work as a medical expert witness in federal and state litigation against opioid manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies, book royalties from Johns Hopkins University Press and Dutton Penguin Random House, speaking honoraria or travel expenses, or both, from the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, the Ohio State University School of Medicine, the University of Kansas School of Medicine (sponsorship of the Alpha Omega Alpha Visiting Professorship), the Oregon Pain Guidance, the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council, the Perrin's Opioid Litigation Conference, the Public Funds Forum, the Baton Rouge Health District, the Montrose Colorado Annual Continuing Medical Education Conference, the PerformRX Pharmacy Benefits Manager Annual Conference, the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, the Psych Congress, the 69th Annual Canadian Refresher Course for Family Physicians, the Ohio State University Inter-Professional Summit, the University of Texas, the Geminus Community Partners Annual Conference of Indiana, the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, the Stanford Sierra Camp Womens' Alumni Wellness Retreat, the American Psychiatric Association, the Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse, and the Southwestern Gynecologic Assembly. SCM has been supported by the Redlich Professorship and the Rosekrans Pain Research Endowment Fund at Stanford University School of Medicine and research grants awarded to Stanford University from the US National Institutes of Health (R61NS118651, R03HD094577, R01DA045027, R01NS109450, R01AT008561, K24DA02926207, R01DA035484, and P01AT00665105), the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI OPD-1610- 370707), the Stanford Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, and the University of California, San Francisco–Stanford Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (FDA) (2U01FD005978-06), has received speaking honoraria or travel expenses from Walter Reed, Harvard University, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, Washington University, the US Food and Drug Administration, the US National Institutes of Health, the US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the University of Washington, George Washington University, New York University, Weill Cornell Medical College, Duke University, the University of Utah, the World Institute of Pain, and the Canadian Pain Society, has received payment for testimony (unrelated to opioids) from Lauria Tokunaga Gates and Linn, and has received payment for consulting (unrelated to opioids) from the American Society of Anesthesiology; Favros Law; Fain Anderson VanDerhoef Rosendahl O'Halloran Spillane; Cox, Wootton, Lerner, Griffin & Hansen; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith; Muro & Lampe; McCormick Barstow; Schmid & Voiles; and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. LLO has received travel expenses or honoraria from Cardozo Law School, Claremont McKenna College, Duke University, ETH Zürich, Georgetown University, Harvard University, the Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association, Michigan State University, New York University, Northwestern University, the University of Chicago, the University of Houston, the University of Kansas, the University of Nebraska, the University of San Diego, the University of Texas, the University of Villanova, the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Yale University, has received a writing honoraria from the Brookings Institution (to write a policy proposal for the Hamilton Project), and is a paid consultant to the MITRE Corporation (to assist with evaluations of the US Patent and Trademark Office requested by the Department of Commerce). BS has received research support from the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA023650 and K23 AA023284), the US National Institute of Drug Abuse (R21 DA043181), the US National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH115838), and the US National Highway Transportation Safety Authority, has received royalties from a software licence to healthStratica, and has several invention disclosures with the University of Pittsburgh for digital behavioral interventions. CT has been supported by the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA HSR&D IIR 15-298, IIR 18-253, IIR 20-058, and PPO 16-337) and the US National Institutes of Health (NIAAA 1R01AA024136-01).

Objectives: Case reports of fatal overdoses involving the novel synthetic opioid isotonitazene have prompted the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to consider an emergency scheduling of the drug in June 2020. We aimed to epidemiologically characterize deaths involving isotonitazene., Methods: We conducted a case control study using publicly available mortality records from January 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020 in Cook County, IL and Milwaukee County, WI. Cases (all deaths involving isotonitazene) and controls (all deaths involving other synthetic opioids) were compared on demographic characteristics, number of substances involved in fatal overdose, and co-involvement of other substances., Results: We identified 40 fatal overdoses involving isotonitazene and 981 fatal overdoses involving other synthetic opioids. Isotonitazene deaths involved a significantly greater number of substances, and were significantly more likely to involve the designer benzodiazepine flualprazolam., Discussion: Isotonitazene was involved in a substantial minority of synthetic opioid overdose deaths in the first 7 months of 2020. Future studies characterizing its prevalence in other markets are warranted. Emergence of highly potent novel synthetic opioids underscore the need for comprehensive health services for people with opioid use disorder., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 American Society of Addiction Medicine.)

We reviewed publicly available data from major US health jurisdictions to compare severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 case fatality rates in people experiencing homelessness with the general population. The case fatality rate among people experiencing homelessness was 1.3 times (95% CI, 1.1-1.5) that of the general population, suggesting that people experiencing homelessness should be prioritized for vaccination., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Substance use decreases the likelihood of achieving undetectable HIV viremia; however, the comparative effects by drug have not been fully described. In this study, we compare the effects of methamphetamine use versus other drugs on viremia in sexual minority men on antiretroviral therapy (ART)., Methods: HIV-positive participants currently on ART (N = 230) were selected from an ongoing cohort of diverse young sexual minority men (mSTUDY) enrolled from August 2014 to May 2018. Substance use and sociodemographic factors associated with viremia outcomes were assessed using ordinal regression analysis with generalized estimating equations. Viremia outcomes were grouped as undetectable (<20 copies/mL), low level suppressed (21-200 copies/mL), or not suppressed (>200 copies/mL)., Results: The prevalence of drug use across 825 study visits was 73 %, with methamphetamine use most prevalent (50 %). After adjusting for unstable housing and ART adherence, methamphetamine use, either alone (adjusted OR = 1.87; 95 % CI 1.03-3.40) or with other drugs (adjusted OR = 1.82; 95 % CI 1.12-2.95), was associated with higher odds of increasing viremia compared to no drug use. Other drug use excluding methamphetamine did not show a similar association (adjusted OR = 1.29; 95 % CI 0.80-2.09). Among our study population, nearly half the instances of viremia could be reduced if methamphetamine was discontinued (attributable fraction = 46 %; 95 % CI 3-71 %)., Conclusions: Methamphetamine use, either alone or in combination with other drugs, is associated with failure of viral suppression among sexual minority men on ART independent of adherence and sociodemographic factors. This accounts for nearly half of the observed instances of unsuppressed viremia in this study., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Our objective was to characterize the proportion of U.S. mental health clinics that offered LGBT-tailored mental health services between 2014 and 2018. We used data from the National Mental Health Services Survey (NMHSS) to construct a mixed logistic model of availability of LGBT-tailored mental health services over time, by region (Northeast, South, Midwest and West), and by facility type (Veterans Administration, inpatient/residential, outpatient, community mental health centers and mixed). Our results show that the overall proportion of mental health clinics that offered LGBT-tailored services decreased from 2014 to 2018. Our results also indicate that Veteran Affairs clinics and facilities in the West and Northeast were most likely to offer LGBT-tailored mental health services. Given the temporal, regional, and facility gaps in LGBT-tailored mental health services availability, more effort should be dedicated to addressing this disparity., Competing Interests: Disclosure. The authors have no relevant financial interest or affiliations with any commercial interests related to the subjects discussed within this article.

Background: Overdose deaths from synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl) increased 10-fold in the United States from 2013 to 2018, despite such opioids being rare in illicit drug markets west of the Mississippi River. Public health professionals have feared a "fentanyl breakthrough" in western U.S. drug markets could further accelerate overdose mortality. We evaluated the number and nature of western U.S. fentanyl deaths using the most recent data available., Methods: We systematically searched jurisdictions west of the Mississippi River for publicly available data on fentanyl-related deaths since 2018, the most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) statistics. Using mortality data from 2019 and 2020, we identified changes in fentanyl-related mortality rate and proportion of fatal heroin-, stimulant, and prescription pill overdoses involving fentanyl., Results: Seven jurisdictions had publicly available fentanyl death data through December 2019 or later: Arizona; California; Denver County, CO; Harris County, TX; King County, WA; Los Angeles County, CA; and Dallas-Fort Worth, TX (Denton, Johnson, Parker, and Tarrant counties). All reported increased fentanyl deaths over the study period. Their collective contribution to national synthetic narcotics mortality increased 371 % from 2017 to 2019. Available 2020 data shows a 63 % growth in fentanyl-mortality over 2019. Fentanyl-involvement in heroin, stimulant, and prescription pill deaths has substantially grown., Discussion: Fentanyl has spread westward, increasing deaths in the short-term and threatening to dramatically worsen the nation's already severe opioid epidemic in the long-term. Increasing the standard dose of naloxone, expanding Medicaid, improving coverage of addiction treatment, and public health educational campaigns should be prioritized., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate outpatient opioid dispensing and the incidence of persistent opioid use after ectopic pregnancy., Methods: This cohort study used U.S. employer-based claims data to identify opioid-naïve individuals experiencing ectopic pregnancy from November 1, 2008, to September 30, 2015. Treatment was categorized as surgical, medical (using methotrexate), or unknown. New opioid prescriptions were defined as prescriptions filled from 1 week before to 1 week after an ectopic pregnancy treatment. For those who filled a new opioid prescription, we calculated the incidence and risk factors for persistent opioid use, defined as having filled at least one opioid prescription both from 8 to 90 days after treatment and from 91 to 365 days after treatment., Results: Of the 15,338 individuals in our study, 7,047 (45.9%, 95% CI 45.2-46.7%) filled an opioid prescription at the time of treatment, of whom 4.1% (95% CI 3.6-4.6%) developed persistent opioid use. The risk of persistent opioid use was lower among those who had surgical compared with medical treatment (3.7% and 6.8%, respectively; relative risk [RR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.77). Variables most strongly associated with persistent opioid use were a history of benzodiazepine use (RR 1.99; 95% CI 1.43-2.78; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22), antidepressant use (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.45-2.53; aRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.18), and a pre-existing pain disorder (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.26-1.99; aRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16-1.85) in the year before treatment., Conclusion: New opioid use is common after an ectopic pregnancy; approximately 4% of those with new opioid use develop persistent opioid use, with the rate higher in those treated medically. New pain-management guidelines need to be developed to prevent persistent opioid use after ectopic pregnancy.

Understanding why clients stop taking pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is critical to improve PrEP delivery and ultimately reduce HIV incidence. We analyzed data from a programmatic evaluation conducted at the Los Angeles LGBT Center from February to May 2018. Of 180 respondents to the emailed survey, 91 had stopped taking PrEP and 11 never started. Among former PrEP users, most common reasons for stopping were entering a monogamous relationship (43%) and side effects (40%). Ten of 11 who never started PrEP reported access barriers (e.g., cost, insurance problems). A quarter of inactive clients re-engaged with PrEP services following the survey and 15% restarted PrEP by October 2018. Improving PrEP retention may require multifaceted interventions-e.g., tailored discussions about stopping and restarting PrEP safely as HIV risk changes, ensuring consistent access to affordable PrEP, and alternative dosing strategies. An emailed survey may be a simple, effective strategy to reengage some PrEP clients.

Importance: Misinformation about cannabis and opioid use disorder (OUD) may increase morbidity and mortality if it leads individuals with OUD to forego evidence-based treatment. It has not been systematically evaluated whether officially designating OUD as a qualifying condition for medical cannabis is associated with cannabis dispensaries suggesting cannabis as a treatment for OUD., Objective: To examine whether state-level policies designating OUD a qualifying condition for medical cannabis are associated with more dispensaries claiming cannabis can treat OUD., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study of 208 medical dispensary brands was conducted in 2019 using the brands' online content. The study included dispensaries operating in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, where OUD is a qualifying condition for medical cannabis, and in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Ohio, and West Virginia, where this policy does not exist., Exposures: Presence of OUD on the list of qualifying conditions for a state's medical cannabis program., Main Outcomes and Measures: Binary indicators of whether online content from the brand said cannabis can treat OUD, can replace US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for OUD, can be an adjunctive therapy to Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for OUD, or can be used as a substitute for opioids to treat other conditions (eg, chronic pain)., Results: After excluding duplicates, listings for nonexistent dispensaries, and those without online content, 167 brands across 7 states were included in the analysis (44 [26.3%] in states where OUD was a qualifying condition and 123 [73.7%] in adjacent states). A dispensary listed in a directory for West Virginia was not operational; therefore, comparison states were Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and Ohio. In policy-exposed states, 39% (95% CI, 23%-55%) more dispensaries claimed cannabis could treat OUD compared with unexposed states (P < .001). For replacing medications for OUD and being an adjunctive therapy, the differences were 14% (95% CI, 2%-26%; P = .002) and 28% (95% CI, 14%-42%; P < .001), respectively. The suggestion that cannabis could substitute for opioids (eg, to treat chronic pain) was made by 25% (95% CI, 9%-41%) more brands in policy-exposed states than adjacent states (P = .002)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, state-level policies designating OUD as a qualifying condition for medical cannabis were associated with more dispensaries claiming cannabis can treat OUD. In the current policy environment, in which medical claims by cannabis dispensaries are largely unregulated, these advertisements could harm patients. Future research linking these policies to patient outcomes is warranted.

Young MSM, especially ethnic and racial minority young MSM, bear a disproportionate burden of new HIV infections. This group also has the highest rates of undiagnosed infection and lowest rates of viral suppression. Previous research indicates that young MSM are testing for HIV too late, which may explain why rates of new HIV infection are rising in young Hispanic MSM and not falling in young Black and White MSM despite advances in preventive medications. Analysis of our sample showed an overall average age at first HIV test of approximately 26. The average age at first HIV test was 25.5 years for Black/African American individuals, 24.7 years for Hispanic individuals, and 28 years for White individuals. More testing resources and innovative outreach methods are needed to increase rates of testing among young MSM.

Background: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved three long-acting medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD): extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) in 2010, a subdermal buprenorphine implant in 2016, and a depot buprenorphine injection in 2017. Long-acting MOUD options may improve adherence while reducing diversion, but their availability compared to daily-dosing MOUD has not been well-characterized. The objective of this analysis was to characterize the availability of long-acting MOUD in substance use disorder treatment settings in the United States., Methods: Using the 2017 National Survey on Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS) and state-level opioid overdose mortality, we examined associations between state- and facility-level factors and offering long-acting MOUD, which included XR-NTX and the buprenorphine implant. We constructed multivariable mixed logistic regression models for both types of long-acting MOUD., Results: Nationwide, 38% (n = 5141) of substance use treatment facilities provided any kind of MOUD (daily or long-acting). Of these, 62% provided XR-NTX, whereas only 3% offered the buprenorphine implant. Facilities in the East North Central, East South Central, West North Central and Mountain regions had higher odds of offering XR-NTX, as did federally-funded facilities, and facilities in states with the highest opioid overdose mortality rates., Conclusions: In 2017, XR-NTX was available at most of the minority of facilities offering MOUD, but the buprenorphine implant was not. Increasing the availability of MOUD, including long-acting options, is necessary to address unmet need for opioid use disorder treatment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We conducted a records-based cohort study of patients who initiated pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at a large federally qualified health center in Los Angeles, CA to characterize patterns of PrEP use, identify correlates of PrEP discontinuation, and calculate HIV incidence. Of 3121 individuals initiating PrEP between 2014 and 2017, 42% (n = 1314) were active (i.e., had a current PrEP prescription) in April 2018. HIV incidence was 0.1/100 person-years among active PrEP patients, compared to 2.1/100 person-years among patients who discontinued. Compared to patients accessing PrEP through government programs with no prescription copay, risk of discontinuation was higher among those with private insurance (ARR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2, 1.7), or no insurance (ARR = 4.5, 95% CI 3.2, 6.4). Sixty-three percent of active PrEP patients had gaps between PrEP prescriptions, averaging one gap per year (median length = 65 days). Increasing access to free or low-cost PrEP can improve PrEP continuity.

Background: Co-occurring mental health disorders are common among substance use disorder (SUD) patients. Medicaid expansion aimed to reduce barriers to SUD and mental health care and thereby improve treatment outcomes., Methods: We estimated change in the proportion of United States SUD treatment sites offering treatment for psychiatric comorbidities following Medicaid expansion as part of implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014. Using panel data from the 2013-2014, n = 660, and 2016-2017, n = 638, waves of the National Drug Abuse Treatment System Survey (NDATSS), we estimated change in the proportion of sites offering antidepressant medication, other psychiatric medication, behavioral treatment, or any combination thereof for treatment of mental health comorbidities (i.e., beyond services focused on SUD). We modeled the impact of Medicaid expansion as an interaction between year and date of Medicaid expansion. We constructed a mixed-effects linear regression model for each outcome, with the interaction variable as the main exposure, site as a random effect, and site's average duration of treatment, proportion of clients with psychiatric comorbidities, average caseload per treatment prescribing-clinician on staff, type of facility and geographic region as covariates, to estimate a difference-in-differences (D-I-D) equation., Results: The adjusted D-I-D analysis indicated that the proportion of SUD treatment sites offering antidepressants for psychiatric treatment increased 10% (95% CI 1%, 18%) in the Medicaid expansion sites compared to non-expansion sites. The D-I-D for other psychiatric medications was also 10% (95% 1%, 19%). No significant changes were observed in behavioral treatment or the combination measure. The strongest association between Medicaid expansion and offering medication for mental health comorbidities was the 34% increase observed for residential treatment settings (95% CI 10%, 59%)., Conclusion: Availability of psychiatric medication treatment in SUD treatment settings increased following Medicaid expansion, particularly in residential SUD facilities. This policy change has facilitated integrated treatment for the substantial share of SUD treatment patients with mental health comorbidities, with the greatest benefit for patients receiving SUD treatment in residential programs., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: Among men who have sex with men (MSM) the relationship between sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and cannabis use is not well established. We assessed cannabis use, sexual behavior, and STIs including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in a diverse cohort of young MSM., Methods: In Los Angeles, the mSTUDY cohort conducted visits every 6 months with 512 MSM between 2014 and 2017 collecting demographics, sexual behaviors, and reports of frequency of substance use. Each visit conducted testing for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis via blood, urine, and pharyngeal and rectal swabs by PCR, Human immunodeficiency virus was assessed using rapid tests for HIV-negatives and viral load for HIV-positives. We analyzed the relationship between cannabis use, sexual behaviors and STIs/HIV across 1535 visits., Results: Significantly fewer participants tested positive for STIs at visits when reporting the previous 6 months use of only cannabis (11.7%) compared with no drugs (16.3%) or other drugs (20.0%, P = 0.01). Fewer MSM reporting only cannabis use than no or other drug use had been incarcerated, had incarcerated partners, experienced interpersonal violence, and were HIV-positive. In multivariable analyses visits with positive STIs were associated with other drug use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.78) but not use of cannabis only or no drug use after controlling for age, HIV status, new sex partners, and number of sex partners., Conclusions: When MSM reported using cannabis exclusively fewer STIs were detected and lower risk sexual engagements reported than when MSM reported no drug or other drug use.

Background: Cannabis (marijuana) has been legalized for recreational and/or medicinal use in many US states, despite remaining a Schedule-I drug at the federal level. As legalization regimes are established in multiple countries, public health professionals should leverage decades of knowledge from other policy areas (e.g., alcohol and tobacco regulation) to inform cannabis policy. Objectives: Identify policy lessons from other more established policy areas that can inform cannabis policy in the United States, Canada, and any other nations that legalize recreational cannabis. Methods: Narrative review of policy and public health literature. Results: We identified six key lessons to guide cannabis policy. To avoid the harms of "a medical system only in name," medical cannabis programs should either be regulated like medicine or combined with the recreational market. Capping potency of cannabis products can reduce the harms of the drug, including addiction. Pricing policies that promote public health may include minimum unit pricing or taxation by weight. Protecting science and public health from corporate interest can prevent the scenarios we have seen with soda and tobacco lobbies funding studies to report favorable results about their products. Legalizing states can go beyond reducing possession arrests (which can be accomplished without legalization) by expunging prior criminal records of cannabis-related convictions. Finally, facilitating rigorous research can differentiate truth from positive and negative hype about cannabis' effects. Conclusion: Scientists and policymakers can learn from the successes and failures of alcohol and tobacco policy to regulate cannabis products, thereby mitigating old harms of cannabis prohibition while reducing new harms from legalization.

Objectives: To quantify sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) disparities in incidence of HIV, other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and viral hepatitis., Methods: We performed a records-based study of 19 933 patients visiting a federally qualified health center in Los Angeles, California, between November 2016 and October 2017 that examined HIV, STIs, and viral hepatitis incidence proportions. We created multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between incidence proportions and SOGI among people living with HIV and HIV-negative patients., Results: Among those who were HIV-negative at baseline (n = 16 757), 29% tested positive for any STI during the study period, compared with 38% of people living with HIV. Stratified by birth sex, STI positivity was 32% among men and 11% among women. By SOGI, STI positivity was 35% among gay and bisexual cisgender men, 15% among heterosexual cisgender men, 11% among cisgender women, 25% among transgender women, 13% among gay and bisexual transgender men, 3% among heterosexual transgender men, and 26% among nonbinary people., Conclusions: Stratifying by SOGI highlighted disparities that are obscured when stratifying by birth sex. Public Health Implications. To monitor and reduce disparities, health jurisdictions should include SOGI data with infectious disease reporting.

Objectives: To characterize uptake of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in a community setting and to identify disparities in PrEP use by demographic and behavioral factors associated with increased HIV risk., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 19 587 men who have sex with men and transgender people visiting a Los Angeles, California, clinic specializing in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender care between August 2015 and February 2018 by using clinical care data., Results: Seventy percent of patients met PrEP eligibility criteria, while 10% reported PrEP use. Using sex drugs, reporting both condomless anal intercourse and recent sexually transmitted infection, older age, and higher education level were associated with higher odds of PrEP use given eligibility. Latino or Asian race/ethnicity and bisexual orientation were associated with lower odds of PrEP use given eligibility. Higher odds of perceived need were associated with demographic risk factors but PrEP use was not similarly elevated., Conclusions: Discrepancies between PrEP eligibility, perceived need, and use reveal opportunities to improve PrEP delivery in community settings. Public Health Implications. Efforts are needed to facilitate PrEP uptake in populations with highest HIV incidence.

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective method for reducing HIV incidence among at-risk populations. However, concerns exist over the potential for an increase in STIs following PrEP initiation. The objective of this study is to compare the STI incidence before and after PrEP initiation within subjects among a cohort of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles, California., Methods: The present study used data from patients who initiated PrEP services at the Los Angeles LGBT Center between October 2015 and October 2016 (n=275). A generalised linear mixed model was used with a case-crossover design to determine if there was a significant difference in STIs within subjects 365 days before (before-PrEP period) and 365 days after PrEP initiation (after-PrEP period)., Results: In a generalised linear mixed model, there were no significant differences in urethral gonorrhoea (P=0.95), rectal gonorrhoea (P=0.33), pharyngeal gonorrhoea (P=0.65) or urethral chlamydia (P=0.71) between periods. There were modest increases in rectal chlamydia (rate ratio (RR) 1.83; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.98; P=0.01) and syphilis diagnoses (RR 2.97; 95% CI 1.23 to 7.18; P=0.02)., Conclusions: There were significant increases in rectal chlamydia and syphilis diagnoses when comparing the periods directly before and after PrEP initiation. However, only 28% of individuals had an increase in STIs between periods. Although risk compensation appears to be present for a segment of PrEP users, the majority of individuals either maintain or decrease their sexual risk following PrEP initiation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Background: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) face higher rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) compared with the general population. The association between venues where sexual partners are met and STI transmission is dynamic and poorly understood, especially among those who use geosocial networking (GSN) apps. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference in STI incidence between MSM who met their last sexual partner through a GSN app and MSM who met their last partner via other venues., Methods: Data were analyzed from HIV-negative MSM attending the Los Angeles LBGT Center between August 2015 and July 2016 (n = 9499). Logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between STI incidence and whether or not an individual met his last partner through a GSN app., Results: No relationship was detected between STI incidence and whether one's last sexual partner was met via GSN app. However, an association was detected between STI incidence and having used GSN apps to meet sexual partners in the past 3 months. A dose-response relationship was observed between the number of venues used to meet partners and testing positive for any STI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.14)., Conclusions: The relationship between how people meet sexual partners and STI acquisition is much more nuanced than previously thought. Geosocial networking apps do not inherently expose users to high-risk reservoirs of STIs, but further understanding of the complexity of sexual networks and networking methods is warranted, given increasing rates of STIs.

Purpose: LGBT populations have high rates of tobacco use. Health centers serving LGBT clients are an important source of care. The researchers aimed to assess the implementation of recommended systems-level tobacco cessation interventions at these health centers., Methods: Using systematic searching, directories, and expert review, we identified health centers serving LGBT clients that provide primary care. We conducted phone-based, semi-structured interviews with administrators (n = 11) between September 2016 and March 2017 regarding implementation of the Clinical Practice Guideline, Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update (the Guideline). Two authors confirmed saturation and two authors conducted thematic coding., Results: Eight themes were identified, including clear evidence of systems-level procedures for asking about, advising on, and assessing tobacco use. Interviewees viewed tobacco use as important given existing disparities. However, there was room for improvement in the following areas: (1) Education for staff on tobacco cessation was ad hoc and not formalized; (2) materials and resources for tobacco cessation available in the center varied widely and changed when a staff champion arrived or left; (3) no point person was assigned to coordinate tobacco cessation efforts; and, (4) assessment of tobacco use as a vital sign is not consistent-some centers met meaningful use quality metrics (e.g., once or more in the past 24 months) instead of the Guideline recommendation (every visit). Addressing tobacco use competes with addressing other health risk behaviors., Conclusions: Administrators at health centers serving LGBT clients viewed tobacco use as an important issue. However, there was room for improvement in implementation of systems recommended in the Guideline. Targeted outreach is warranted to improve standardization of implementation and promote cessation of tobacco use.

Purpose: This study analyzed the accuracy of presumptive gonorrhea treatment in a sexual health clinic serving primarily gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Treating suspected gonorrhea before laboratory confirmation can reduce symptoms and transmission; however, this strategy can overtreat uninfected individuals, which may promote antimicrobial resistance. We identified differences in accuracy of gonorrhea presumptive treatment by site of infection and presence of signs or symptoms., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of gay, bisexual, and other MSM who were treated presumptively for gonorrhea at the Los Angeles LGBT Center between February and July 2015. We calculated positivity of treated patients, proportion of infections treated, and positive predictive value (PPV) of treating gonorrhea presumptively based on signs, symptoms, or exposure at the urethral, rectal, or pharyngeal site., Results: Of 9141 testing visits, presumptive treatment was provided at 1677 (18%). Overall, gonococcal infections were identified at 31% (n = 527) of visits where presumptive treatment was provided, compared to 9% (n = 657) of visits without presumptive treatment (P < 0.01). Forty-five percent of gonococcal infections were treated presumptively, and treatment was provided at 14% of gonorrhea-negative visits. Seventy-eight percent of urethral, 54% of rectal, and 35% of pharyngeal infections were treated presumptively. PPV was highest for genitourinary signs., Conclusion: Approximately one-third of gay, bisexual, or other MSM treated presumptively for gonorrhea at a sexual health clinic tested positive for gonorrhea. These findings highlight the potential contribution of point-of-care tests in reducing overtreatment resulting from presumptive treatment.

Objectives: HIV studies and risk assessments among men who have sex with men (MSM) frequently use self-reported STI history as a proxy for true STI history. The objective of our study was to assess the validity of self-reported STI history through comparison with laboratory-confirmed biomedical results., Methods: Data were analysed for MSM attending the Los Angeles LGBT Center (the Center) from August 2011 to July 2015. We identified 10 529 unique MSM who received testing for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and/or syphilis and had a later visit in which they self-reported their STI history to a clinic counsellor during a risk assessment., Results: MSM who had an STI in the past year self-reported their STI history with 51%-56% accuracy, and MSM who had an STI more than a year ago self-reported their STI history with 65%-72% accuracy. Among MSM with any positive STIs at the Center, black/African-American and Hispanic MSM were more likely to inaccurately self-report their positive results for gonorrhoea (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.48, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.01; aOR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.70). Additionally, HIV-positive MSM were more likely to inaccurately self-report their positive results for gonorrhoea (aOR: 1.63, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.18) and/or syphilis (aOR: 2.19, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.47)., Conclusions: This is the first study that attempts to evaluate the validity of self-reported STI history among MSM. We found that self-reported STI history may not be an appropriate proxy for true STI history in certain settings and minority populations. Clinical guidelines and research studies that rely on self-reported STI history will need to modify their recommendations in light of the limited validity of these data., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)